Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 1 of 9
Debtor
*
*
*
In re:
BARWOOD, INC.
Debtor
*
*
*
*
*
Debtor
Debtor
#2740836v.1
*
*
In re:
In re:
In re:
Case 16-26550
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
In re:
Debtor
*
Page 2 of 9
*
*
This Court has jurisdiction over this Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157
and 1334, and Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b). This matter is a core proceeding, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 157(b)(2).
2.
3.
States Code (the Bankruptcy Code) and Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure (the Bankruptcy Rules).
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 3 of 9
Background
4.
On December 20, 2016, the Debtors each filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and, pursuant to 1107 and 1108 of
the Bankruptcy Code (the Petition Date) , have each continued in the possession of
their properties and management of their businesses as Debtors-In-Possession.
5.
both now deceased, with 45 taxis. Over the past more than 50 years, the company has
grown into a diversified ground transportation company located in Montgomery County,
Maryland. Collectively, the Debtors and certain non-debtor driver partners have a taxi
fleet of approximately 457 vehicles and constitute the largest fleet of taxicabs in
Montgomery County.
6.
approximately $7.1 Million in 2015 and $3.3 Million for the first 7 1/2 months of 2016.
As of December 31, 2015, the Debtors and certain non-debtor driver partners had
approximately $4.5 Million in assets and approximately $5.4 Million in liabilities. The
Debtors have 57 employees.
7.
29, 2007 and their Joint Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization (the Fourth Amended
Plan) was confirmed by this Court on March 15, 2010. The Fourth Amended Plan was
funded primarily through the sales of Personal Vehicle Licenses (PVLs). Initially, the
Debtors were able to sell PVLs for $65,000. However, a combination of factors
contributed to depress the market for PVLs, including an inability to find third party
financing and later, competition from Uber and Lyft.
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
8.
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 4 of 9
Although ride sharing services such as Uber and Lyft have existed since
2012, their entry into the Montgomery County transportation marketplace did not make
any substantial impact until 2014. These services began to provide a substantial number
of rides to the public in Washington D.C. and quickly spread into the suburbs. These
services entered into the local market without complying with any regulations, allowing
them to offer fares that were substantially lower than the regulated prices of taxis. These
services also had none of the overhead of a traditional taxi company as they neither
owned nor insured any vehicles or employed customer service personnel. These services
also refused to comply with any of the regulatory controls that applied to taxicabs.
9.
savvy customers and simultaneously cut into the ridership of taxis as well as the pool of
available drivers that would ordinarily rent taxis. The fast growth and success of these
companies also created a customer momentum that allowed these companies to oppose
efforts by governmental bodies to regulate them.
10.
County Legislature reform its taxicab regulatory scheme to create a level playing field for
taxis and these ride sharing companies. In 2015, the Montgomery County Council
reformed its taxicab code, but in so doing, failed to require any regulation of these socalled Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). While the law did make changes
to loosen regulations on taxicabs, it also added new ones preserving the gross regulatory
imbalance between taxis and TNCs. The TNCs now enjoy a regulatory scheme that
favors them and punishes traditional taxi services.
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
11.
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 5 of 9
repayment deadline under the Fourth Amended Plan. The Fourth Amended Plan
provided for 100% repayment to all unsecured creditors plus interest. The Debtors paid
the creditors 80% of their allowed claims plus interest. However, the market for the sales
of PVLs continued to deteriorate and the difficulty finding drivers who were willing to
rent taxis had a devastating impact on the Debtors operations. Accordingly, the Debtors
were forced to file the instant bankruptcy petitions.
Relief Requested
12.
Reorganization Cases, by this Motion, the Debtors seek entry of an order pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b), authorizing the joint administration, for procedural purposes
only, with the case number assigned to Blue Star Group, Inc. serving as the lead case.
Basis for Relief
13.
bankruptcy petitions filed by a debtor and its affiliates may be consolidated for joint
administration. BSG, Barwood, CTC, City Lease, Fleet Tech and SSTC meet the
definition of affiliates as defined by 101(2) of the Bankruptcy Code in that each are
owned by Transco, Inc., and 100% of the stock in Transco, Inc. is owned by Lee Barnes.
14.
BSG, Barwood, CTC, City Lease, Fleet Tech, and SSTC together and
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 6 of 9
making it the largest fleet of taxicabs in Montgomery County. BSG is the employer and
paymaster for all of the companys employees. SSTC was acquired from a former
competitor in 1992 which is the holder of 15 PVLs and operates under the Barwood
company logo. CTC, which was acquired from a former competitor in 1993, is the holder
of 75 PVLs and operates under the Barwood company logo. City Lease owns the
equipment used by all of the Debtors in their taxi businesses. Fleet tech operates the
companys maintenance facility used to service the taxi fleet of all the Debtors.
15.
believe that joint administration of their cases would be in the best interests of their
respective estates. Joint administration of the six cases should result in significantly
reduced administrative expenses and simplify the administration of these cases for all
parties, by reducing the administrative burden of having to file multiple and duplicative
pleadings. Additionally, judicial economy will clearly be served by joint administration.
This Court will be relieved of the burden of entering duplicative orders and maintaining
duplicative files. Finally, supervision of the administrative aspects of the cases by the
Office of the United States Trustee will be simplified.
17.
cases because the Motion requests only administrative, not substantive consolidation of
the estates. For example, any creditor may still file a claim against a particular Debtor or
its estate, or multiple Debtors and their respective estates.
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
18.
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 7 of 9
bankruptcy proceedings is in the best interests of the Debtors, their creditor and equity
security holders, and all parties in interest.
19.
The Debtors therefore request that these cases be jointly administered for
procedural purposes only. This Motion does not request substantive consolidation.
WHEREFORE, Blue Star Group, Inc., Barwood, Inc., Checker Transportation
Company, Inc., City Lease, Inc., Fleet Tech, Inc., and Silver Spring Transportation
Company request the entry of an Order (i) authorizing the joint administration of the
cases under the case number assigned to Blue Star Group, Inc.; and (ii) granting such
other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 8 of 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 20th day of December, 2016, a copy of
the foregoing Emergency Motion for Entry of an Order Pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Directing Joint Administration of the Debtors
Reorganization Cases, proposed Order were served by email on Jordan Spivok, Esquire,
Protas, Spivok & Collins, LLC, 4330 East West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, MD
20814-4454; Zvi Guttman, Esquire, the Law Offices of Zvi Guttman, P.A., P.O. Box
32308, Baltimore, Maryland 21282; Fred H.W. Carter, Esquire, Venable LLP, 750 East
Pratt Street, Suite 900, Baltimore, Maryland 21202; Stephen B. Gerald, Esquire,
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP, 7 Saint Paul Street, Suite 1900, Baltimore, Maryland
21202; and the Office of the U.S. Trustee, 6305 Ivy Lane, Suite 600 Greenbelt,
Maryland 20770, and was mailed by overnight delivery, postage prepaid, to the 20 largest
unsecured creditors on the attached list.
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4
Filed 12/20/16
Page 9 of 9
12/19/16
Sheehy Ford
901 N. Frederick Avenue
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
Shulman, Rogers
12505 Park Potomac Avenue
th
6 Floor
Potomac, MD 20854
Lucy Han
c/o Kenneth Braunstein, Esquire
200A Montrose Street, Suite 100
Rockville, MD 20850
USAA Insurance
Subrogee of Stephen Sulzer
1100 Superior Avenue, Suite 1850
Cleveland, OH 44114
Erie Insurance
Subrogee of Gwenn Marley
Wilber & Assoc. PC
201 Landmark Dr.
Normal, IL 61761
Georgian Health
c/o Kevin Goldberg, Esquire
Goldberg & Finnegan
8401 Colesville Road, Suite 630
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Lidia DeVargas
c/o Timothy J. Capurso, Esquire
233 East Redwood St.
Baltimore, MD 21202
Tandem Technologies
32245 Collection Center Dr.
Chicago, IL 60693
Iron Mountain
PO Box 27128
New York, NY 10087
Irma Orellano
c/o Robert Garbo
2730 University Blvd., Suite 604
Silver Spring, MD 20902
Tire World
5702 Industry Lane
Frederick, MD 21704
Meghan Hughes
c/o Larry Burch
7829 Belle Point Drive
Greenbelt, MD 20770
Willys Lovince
c/o Jeffrey Schmieier, Esquire
5405 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 5
Columbia, MD 21045
Verizon Cabs
PO Box 4832
Trenton, NJ 08650
#2740836v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4-1
Filed 12/20/16
Page 1 of 4
Debtor
*
*
*
In re:
BARWOOD, INC.
Debtor
*
*
*
*
*
Debtor
#2740932v.1
In re:
In re:
Case 16-26550
Doc 4-1
Filed 12/20/16
In re:
Debtor
In re:
Debtor
*
Page 2 of 4
*
*
#2740932v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4-1
Filed 12/20/16
Page 3 of 4
ORDERED, that the Clerk is further DIRECTED to make a docket entry in each
of the above-captioned cases substantially as follows: An Order has been entered in this case
directing the joint administration of the chapter 11 cases of Blue Star Group, Inc., Barwood, Inc.
(Barwood), Checker Transportation Company, Inc. , City Lease, Inc. , Fleet Tech, Inc., and
Silver Spring Transportation Company, and the docket in Case No. 16-26548-TJC should be
consulted for all matters affecting these cases.
cc
#2740932v.1
Case 16-26550
Doc 4-1
Filed 12/20/16
Page 4 of 4
12/19/16
Sheehy Ford
901 N. Frederick Avenue
Gaithersburg, MD 20879
Shulman, Rogers
12505 Park Potomac Avenue
th
6 Floor
Potomac, MD 20854
Lucy Han
c/o Kenneth Braunstein, Esquire
200A Montrose Street, Suite 100
Rockville, MD 20850
USAA Insurance
Subrogee of Stephen Sulzer
1100 Superior Avenue, Suite 1850
Cleveland, OH 44114
Erie Insurance
Subrogee of Gwenn Marley
Wilber & Assoc. PC
201 Landmark Dr.
Normal, IL 61761
Georgian Health
c/o Kevin Goldberg, Esquire
Goldberg & Finnegan
8401 Colesville Road, Suite 630
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Lidia DeVargas
c/o Timothy J. Capurso, Esquire
233 East Redwood St.
Baltimore, MD 21202
Tandem Technologies
32245 Collection Center Dr.
Chicago, IL 60693
Iron Mountain
PO Box 27128
New York, NY 10087
Irma Orellano
c/o Robert Garbo
2730 University Blvd., Suite 604
Silver Spring, MD 20902
Tire World
5702 Industry Lane
Frederick, MD 21704
Meghan Hughes
c/o Larry Burch
7829 Belle Point Drive
Greenbelt, MD 20770
Willys Lovince
c/o Jeffrey Schmieier, Esquire
5405 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 5
Columbia, MD 21045
Verizon Cabs
PO Box 4832
Trenton, NJ 08650
END OF ORDER
#2740932v.1