Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/
Culture & Society
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
The TCS Centre, Nottingham Trent University
Additional services and information for Theory, Culture & Society can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://tcs.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://tcs.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://tcs.sagepub.com/content/19/5-6/145.refs.html
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 145
Railroading America
Towards a Material Study of the Nation
Ginette Verstraete
Theory, Culture & Society 2002 (SAGE, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi),
Vol. 19(5/6): 145159
[0263-2764(200210)19:5/6;145159;028411]
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 146
material setting that will allow us not only to unravel the myth of a unified
national culture but also to recuperate the social-economic relations at the
site of its material production and reception. Our scene will be that of the
construction and marketing of the first transcontinental railroad in 19thcentury California at a time when post-Civil-War American entrepreneurs
and politicians were redefining the territorial and symbolic borders of both
the state and of the nation in it. Showing the contradictory material production that went into the implementation of this nation-making and nationmarketing technology, I will unearth a heterogeneous national practice that
besides white Anglo-American capital, mobility and technology involved
white female domesticity and Chinese migrant labor as well as a complex
displacement of all particulars through a mass-publicity of nationalist
symbols such as the steam engine and the western landscape on a regional
and national scale. Studying the formation of the nation from the perspective of the work of emplacement and displacement that went into it allows
me to highlight what tends to remain hidden in cultural (textual) approaches
to nationhood: its involvement in racial, gendered and class-related inclusions and exclusions.
Ultimately, what this essay focuses on is the (re)production of the
social/national through the circulation of divisions as offered by a specific
material apparatus in this case the railroad and the words and images
circulating along its tracks in the service of an all but homogeneous
ideology. As Aijaz Ahmad (1993) has stated:
[T]he nation is not a thing which once made, simply endures . . . nation,
like class, is a process, which is made and remade, a thousand times over,
and, more than process, nation is a terrain of struggle which condenses all
social struggles, so that every organized force in society attempts to endow it
with specific meanings and attributes.
In the material context here discussed, we will replace Bhabhas poststructuralist Janus-faced ambivalence of language itself with what I would
like to describe as the critical intersection of a nations constitutive capitalist technologies, such as the railroad (including its gendered and racialized labour and leisure) and its dissemination and reception through verbal
and visual practices, especially photography. These are technologies that
Downloaded from tcs.sagepub.com at BROWN UNIVERSITY on January 18, 2013
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 147
147
certainly do not emerge in a social vacuum but that are located in a particular historical, material and social context that they co-constitute
and immediately transform (mobilize) in various ways, which, in turn, alters
the conditions under which those technologies function. Transformations in
the terms of technological production in turn lead to shifts in the definition
and symbolic representation of the social realm. To say it with Donna
Haraway, technology is not a neutral given: The machine is not an it to be
animated, worshipped, and dominated. The machine is us, our processes,
an aspect of our embodiment (1991: 180). Thus defined, the social constituted in and through industrial technologies and technology embedded in
varying social relations, are structured by the performative logic of Bhabhas
nation as address (1990: 3). By thus considering the strained relation
between the technology that is present (as object) and the meaningful but
heterogeneous utterances that it is making (as social subject) to and about
the citizen-viewer, we have entered the realm of technology as cultural
performance.
Railroading America
That the railroad played a crucial role in the production of the American
nation should hardly surprise us: since Tocqueville mobility is regarded as
a national characteristic to be an American one has to go somewhere, to
the West. In 1862 Congress decided to connect the Atlantic to the Pacific
Coast by means of a transcontinental railroad for several reasons1 to
strengthen the ties with California and Nevada during the Civil War and
keep them into the Union; to be able to quickly transport military weapons
and personnel westward in future wars against the Indians; to draw more
settlers to the mid-West; and to be able to cheaply transport goods to the
west coast and from there into Asia. As has often been noted, Americas
national destiny was to transcend local conflicts by collectively going
westward:
Above all, the West was there to serve the national good: it was owned by all
and it was an important goal in a nation many feared was tearing itself apart.
It was more amorphous than most goals, but it gave promoters a handy
geographical destination for their roads . . . Railroads and the West naturally
joined together metaphorically and otherwise to illustrate the character of the
nation. (Ward, 1986: 945)
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 148
taken from Indian and Mexican land-owners, and it offered high loans per
mile of tracks laid but not until the first 40 miles of track were built at the
expense of the companies themselves. In this financial setting, constructing the railroad was really a race against time. For this purpose, the CPR
began to massively hire Chinese railroad-workers from 1865 onward: since
white labourers could not be found for the job, and since the celestials
were precise, fast and cheap, Stanford employed thousands of them. A lot
of the Chinese labourers either froze to death in the mountains, or got killed
when blasting the tunnels. Competition, speed, massive corruption, the huge
personal profit of local politicians functioning as national entrepreneurs,
together with the exploitation of cheap Chinese coolie-labour at a time the
country was waging a war over the abolishment of slavery, were the main
ingredients of what has become a classic story of dubious but nevertheless
heroic white male ingenuity in California history. All this consecrated by
that memorable celebration of the completion of the first transcontinental
railroad on Promontory Point (Utah) on 10 May 1869, which goes by the
name of the last spike eternalized by Andrew Russell, official photographer for the Union Pacific:
In May of 1869, gathered at a desolate and lonely spot in northwestern Utah
called Promontory, representatives of the two railroad companies drove the
ceremonial last spikes into the rails that tied the Atlantic with the Pacific.
Photographers captured the scene for posterity, after the Chinese laborers
were asked to step aside. (Deverell, 1994: 22)
Along with the camera displacing the Chinese, the telegraph, newly
installed along the rails, was mobilized to simultaneously send the sounds
of the ceremonial striking to telegraph operators all over the country who,
in turn, gave the signal for church-bells to be tolled and cannons to be fired
in celebration. According to a 20th-century historian:
It was a moment of history likened afterward to the signing of the Declaration
of Independence and the landing of the Pilgrim Fathers. National progress
awaited only the hammer taps that signaled the end of a long campaign to
level mountains and span deserts dividing a great people. (Kraus, 1969:
2801)
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 149
149
lost their land altogether and were forced to start again as day labourers
(Haas, 1995: 80). Indigenous Indian men and women in California, who had
long been deprived of legal titles to their territory by the Californios, were
now forced to live on designated reservation land (Haas, 1995: 58), while
the Indian women also worked as servants and slaves in New Mexican
households (Haas, 1995: 82). Thus, instead of simply making the people
part of one huge capitalist nation, the railroad tracks also functioned as
hyphenations temporarily suspending the relation between those dispossessed citizens and their territory. At the same time the tracks installed
linkages between these varied inhabitants who found themselves excluded
along racial, ethnic, economic but also gender lines. The railroad thus
simultaneously opened up a space where the horizon of the nation was
articulated to its structural outsides, marked by racial, ethnic and gendered
differences. Seen from this perspective, difference, exclusion and particularity more than homogeneity, inclusion and universality were the outcome.
This heterogeneity of particulars found its cultural erasure in a nation-wide
marketing strategy meant to generalize and thus overcome them.
Selling the Railroad: Travelling Citizens and Domestic
Women
What the studies by Haas and Deverell teach us is that the railroad as a
nation-making machinery was controversial from the start, that it elicited
much opposition and that the more the hostility to its hegemony increased,
the more it had to expand its powers to stifle antagonism: the railroad barons
engaged in public practices that ranged from bribing public officials,
manipulating the government to buying up critical newspapers and staffing
them with writers favourable to the railroad. The wealth of mediations generated by the CPR in its reliance on the power of rhetoric, but also the photograph and the spectacle, were a crucial step in mobilizing the audience into
identifying with the steam engine on its linear course westward and hence
into buying it. For some railroad defenders, the vision of the train as a
democratizing force marked the train as a specifically American machine,
especially insofar as the United States embraced technology and mechanization in an intense and rapid manner compared to other nations (Kirby,
1997: 26). Thus, along with the train came the symbolic conception, indeed
emplacement, of a particular citizenry characterized by linear progress
and bourgeois spectatorship as constitutive parts in the expansion of the
railroad network.
To the extent that the production of these progressive American
citizens-viewers as crucial stops in the successful itinerary of the transcontinental was itself accompanied by peculiar rhetorical displacements (of
immigrant workers for instance) and temporal and spatial shifts in localization, we could say that mobility and location, but also difference and
identity, particularity and universality were intricately intertwined in the
technological production of Americas mobile nation. In fact, it seemed that
the conflicts of the social dynamic returned (in a different form) as the
Downloaded from tcs.sagepub.com at BROWN UNIVERSITY on January 18, 2013
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 150
publicity around the CPR was hard pressed to contain and displace them.
And they recurred couched in all the old familiar representational strategies
conceivable: such as the opposition between female nature and male technology, immigrant labour and national leisure; or the Aristotelian plot
characterized by a clear beginning, middle and end; or the tradition of 19thcentury panoramic painting; or the evocation of the American sublime; or
the picturesque, the pastoral and so on.2 The rhetorical topoi (or commonplaces) that the railroad mobilized in its attempt to overcome a growing
resistance to its social-economic-political power were meant to create a
recognizable place that certain American people could inhabit, a face they
could identify with, a position they could take up in the midst of uncertainty
and uprootedness. And while these tropes involved themselves complex
processes of displacement, they had the effect of a map. They told the
audience where they were, what their manifest destiny was, and hence who
they were going to be, an American subject molded in relation to new forms
of perception, leisure, temporality, and modern technology (Kirby, 1997:
24).
That the railroad was as much a technology of transportation as it was
a technology of representation; that it was as much about literally moving
all people in different ways (some lost others gained their land) as it was
about figuratively emplacing a specific citizenry white, male and heterosexual already becomes clear from the promotional rhetoric delivered at
the completion of the transcontinental on 10 May 1869 itself. Let us first
discuss Stanfords famous address in California:
Gentlemen of the Pacific Railroad, the last rail needed to complete the
greatest railroad enterprise of the world is about to be laid; the last spike
needed to unite the Atlantic and Pacific by a new line of trade and commerce
is about to be driven to its place. To perform these acts the east and the west
have come together. Never since history commenced her record of human
events has man been called upon to meet the completion of a work so magnificent in contemplation, and so marvellous in execution. California, within
whose borders and by whose citizens the Pacific Railroad was inaugurated,
desires to express her appreciation of the vast importance to her and her sister
States of the great enterprise which by your action is about to be consummated; from her mines she had forged a spike, from her laurel woods she has
hewn a tie, and by the hands of her citizens she offers them to become a part
of the great highway which is about to unite her in closer fellowship with her
sisters of the Atlantic. From her bosom was taken the first soil, let hers be
the last tie and the last spike, and with them accept the hopes and wishes of
her people that the success of your enterprise may not stop short of its brightest promise. (Kraus, 1969: 2748)
While the marriage of the two railroad companies from the east and
the west is an all-male American event both the speaker and the audience
belong to the male brotherhood of American workers, engineers, entrepreneurs and politicians that Russells photograph eternalized after he had
asked the Chinese to step aside the beneficiary of this greatest railroad
Downloaded from tcs.sagepub.com at BROWN UNIVERSITY on January 18, 2013
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 151
151
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 152
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 153
153
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 154
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 155
155
surrounding it, each photograph is mobilized to point beyond its frame much
like a symbol does. In most of Harts images we are carried (often along the
tracks) beyond the site of depiction toward a larger imaginary space that
the other photographs and later also his tourist guides are to bring home
to the viewer. Each image functions as a passage from here to there, from
one site to the next; what lies in-between is the teleological history of
construction of the photographs as of the railroad and the linearity of
railroad travel. In this manner, each picture positions the viewer vis--vis
the individual scene while already directing him/her to another imaginary
end-point. This produces a dynamics of location and mobility, image and
narrative, through which the viewer is both invited to enter the frame and
moved to set out on route from one landmark (site of construction) to the
next. Travelling through this prepackaged movement (of the photograph as
of the railroad), the viewer traces a larger national space in which the
work depicted becomes the occasion for carrying on, carrying over. This is
the work of metaphorization. And it leads to an idealization of progress at
the expense of the workers who now seem to be laying the ground for their
own displacement.
But linearity, substitution and displacement are not the only
prerequisites to turn one picture into the projection of a national space.
Neither is it enough to subjugate the worker to a god-like surveying camera
and aestheticize his labor within a 19th-century tradition of American
panoramic painting. Similarly, simply watching the sequence of stereographs does not turn the viewer into a group of American travelling citizens.
In order for the event of construction to become a national event, the railroad
company has to do more than turn it into a spectacle. The pictures themselves have to travel en masse. Besides linearity, massive circulation is
needed. Each line of track has to become a site of reproduction and distribution in all directions. This is the moment of simultaneity Benedict
Anderson (1983) talks about in his discussion of the role of print-capitalism
in the imagining of the nation: the simultaneity of experience, of sharing
the books one reads, and the pictures one watches, without which no series
of individual acts would constitute a collective, no particular (racial,
gendered) perspective a general frame.
Not surprisingly, the documentation of the construction of the CPR ran
parallel to the development of the reproducible photographic paper-print
which began to massively replace the non-reproducible daguerreotype in
the 1860s. The arrival of the paper-print and stereo-card commercialized
the image industry in the hands of a burgeoning white bourgeois audience,
for whom citizenry meant first of all participation in a commodified nationstate. For the bourgeois spectator to consume Harts birds eye views in their
leisure time was to enter an imaginary social and geographical space from
which to look down on the railroad workers and into the magnificent vistas
that literally lay at their feet: only waiting to be travelled through. To the
extent that it circulated through thousands of parlour-rooms, the stereograph
became a socializing image reflecting the position of power that the
Downloaded from tcs.sagepub.com at BROWN UNIVERSITY on January 18, 2013
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 156
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 157
157
Conclusion
This article has studied the material production of the national community
in 19th-century America. More particularly, it has concentrated on the intersection between particular technologies of transportation, representation
and dissemination in the imaginary formation of the American nation in the
1860s. As the prime technologies with which individuals can collectively
be placed, displaced, replaced in relation to an imaginary geography and
with which spatially and temporally distant citizens can connect and feel
connected, systems of transportation and communication have been the site
of fierce struggles for power among the nation-builders. But they have
largely been overlooked in narrowly cultural approaches to nationhood. My
analysis of the contradictory mechanism of placement and displacement,
location and mobility, identity and difference at the heart of a particular
state-sanctioned field of national production the construction of Americas
first transcontinental railroad in 19th-century California has highlighted
what tends to remain hidden in cultural (textual) approaches to nationhood:
its involvement in racial, gendered and class-related divisons between
private and public space, home and travel, labour and capital, technology
and nature. This essay has shown that if territorial nation-building implies
the technical implementation of natural frontiers (the Atlantic and Pacific
Coast) around a carefully mapped out racialized (white) and gendered
geobody, then by the same token it generates gendered immigrants and
citizens on the move: the former as the outlawed laborer; the latter as the
prototypical American distanced from the very home(land) for which he
yearns and which he must learn to reimagine as the destination of a collective railroad journey. Ultimately, I have argued, this national geography
this icon of authentic location projected along (with) the tracks of
Americas first transcontinental railroad exists as a series of contradictory
sites/sights (between one site and the next, but also within one image
between Chinese and Americans, labourers and tourists) homogenized in
narratives of citizenry (Stanford) and in the abstracting movement of railroad
travel. In this motion the complex particularities of local places are cast as
spaces of transition to a distant goal in relation to which the viewer assumes
a disembodied position that of the citizen freely travelling in a commodified space called America.
Notes
Earlier versions of this article were presented at the University of California at
Berkeley, at Brunel University and at the University of Amsterdam. I am greatly
indebted to the Fulbright Commission in Brussels for the funds that made the
research on the transcontinental railroad possible and to the staff of the Bancroft
Library, the California State Library, the California Historical Society, the California
State Railroad Museum and the Huntington Library for the patience and support
with which they guided me through the research material. I thank Pat Hilden for
her perceptive comments on the first draft of this essay. My greatest thanks go to
Caren Kaplan for the intellectual stimulation that she, as Director, brought to the
scholars of the Beatrice M. Bain Research Group at Berkeley.
Downloaded from tcs.sagepub.com at BROWN UNIVERSITY on January 18, 2013
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 158
09 Verstraete (jr/t)
28/11/02
3:07 pm
Page 159
159