Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
www.aeph.in
Journal of Exclusive Management Science October 2016 - Vol 5 Issue 10 ISSN 2277-5684
Objectives of the study:
1. To study the job involvement levels of the employees
2. To study the job satisfaction levels of the employees.
3. To identify the impact of job involvement on the job satisfaction levels of the employees.
Hypotheses:
H1: there is no significant impact of job involvement on the job satisfaction levels of the employees.
H2: there is no significant impact of experience of the employees on their job involvement.
H3: there is no significant impact of designation and job involvement of the employees on their job
satisfaction levels.
H4: there is no significant impact of experience and job involvement of the employees on their job
satisfaction levels.
H5: there is no significant impact of qualification and job involvement of the employees on their job
satisfaction levels.
Analysis and Discussions:
In order to know the consistency and reliability of the questionnaire it is tested by using Cronbachs
alpha. Cronbachs alpha value ranges from 0 to1. When the data is tested by cronbachs the alpha value
is .888. This indicates that the consistency of the questionnaire is very good. The table I shows the
results of the cronbachs alpha test.
Table I
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha
N of Items
.888
35
After the Cronbachs alpha test, test of normality is being applied. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and
Shapiro-Wilks test show the significant value P which is less than 0.05 in all the cases. Hence the null
hypothesis of the normal distribution is rejected. Therefore it can be concluded that the data is
normally distributed. The test of normality is shown in the Table II.
Table II
Tests of Normality
MEANJI
MEANJS
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic
df
Sig.
Statistic
df
Sig.
1.40
.374
12
.000
.640
12
.000
1.47
.244
20
.003
.784
20
.000
1.53
.342
20
.000
.773
20
.000
1.60
.492
21
.000
.484
21
.000
1.73
.234
18
.010
.789
18
.001
1.80
.385
15
.000
.630
15
.000
1.87
.262
16
.004
.742
16
.001
2.00
.203
25
.009
.868
25
.004
2.20
.329
10
.003
.655
10
.000
H1: There is no significant impact of job involvement on the job satisfaction levels of the employees.
Univariate Anova is used for analyzing the above hypothesis. Here the dependent variable is job
satisfaction and independent variable is job involvement. The P value at 5% significance level is .000
2
www.aeph.in
Journal of Exclusive Management Science October 2016 - Vol 5 Issue 10 ISSN 2277-5684
which is less than 0.05. Therefore the null hypothesis is rejected. It can be concluded that there is
significant impact of job involvement on the job satisfaction levels of the employees. The results are
interpreted in the table III.
Table III
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: MEANJS
Source
df
Mean Square
Sig.
Corrected Model
13.991a
15
.933
18.535
.000
Intercept
510.622
510.622
10146.801
.000
MEANJI
13.991
15
.933
18.535
.000
Error
9.260
184
.050
Total
731.802
200
df
Mean Square
Sig.
1.118a
.280
3.422
.010
226.485
226.485
2772.403
.000
1.118
.280
3.422
.010
Error
15.930
195
.082
Total
633.053
200
17.048
199
Corrected Model
Intercept
Experience
Corrected Total
3
www.aeph.in
Journal of Exclusive Management Science October 2016 - Vol 5 Issue 10 ISSN 2277-5684
Table V
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: MEANJS
Source
df
Mean Square
Sig.
Corrected Model
19.875a
24
.828
42.940
.000
Intercept
481.606
481.606
24971.884
.000
MEANJI
12.622
15
.841
43.631
.000
Designation
2.068
1.034
53.616
.000
MEANJI * Designation
3.421
.489
25.344
.000
Error
3.375
175
.019
Total
731.802
200
23.250
199
Corrected Total
df
Mean Square
Sig.
Corrected Model
15.734a
27
.583
13.335
.000
Intercept
361.511
361.511
8272.463
.000
MEANJI
12.462
15
.831
19.012
.000
.271
.068
1.550
.190
MEANJI * Experience
1.451
.181
4.152
.000
Error
7.516
172
.044
Total
731.802
200
23.250
199
Experience
Corrected Total
4
www.aeph.in
Journal of Exclusive Management Science October 2016 - Vol 5 Issue 10 ISSN 2277-5684
Table VII
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Dependent Variable: MEANJS
Source
df
Mean
Square
Sig.
Corrected Model
14.984a
23
.651
13.870
.000
Intercept
533.297
533.297
11354.274
.000
MEANJI
13.761
15
.917
19.532
.000
Qualification
.023
.023
.494
.483
MEANJI * Qualification
.980
.140
2.981
.006
Error
8.267
176
.047
Total
731.802
200
23.250
199
Corrected Total
5
www.aeph.in