Professional Documents
Culture Documents
April 2009
This report was prepared by the Energy Information Administration, the independent
statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. The information
contained herein should be attributed to the Energy Information Administration and should
not be construed as advocating or reflecting any policy of the Department of Energy or any
other organization.
Contacts
This report was prepared by the staff of the Survey Operations Team, Coal, Nuclear, and
Renewables Division, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels. Questions
about the preparation and content of this report may be directed to Fred Mayes, Senior
Technical Advisor at e-mail fred.mayes@eia.doe.gov, (202) 586-1508 or Louise Guey-
Lee, at e-mail louise.guey-lee@eia.doe.gov, (202) 586-1293.
The Renewable Energy Annual (2007) is the thirteenth in a series of annual publications
on renewable energy by the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The 2007 edition
presents five chapters, accompanied with data tables, text and graphics covering various
aspects of the renewable energy marketplace:
This includes for the first time two separate chapters for solar energy and an expanded
chapter for geothermal heat pump manufacturing activities.
The renewable energy sources included are biomass (wood, wood waste, municipal solid
waste, landfill gas, ethanol, biodiesel and other biomass); geothermal; wind; solar (solar
thermal and photovoltaic); and conventional hydropower.
Hydroelectric pumped storage facilities are excluded, because they usually use non-
renewable energy sources for their operation. Since the EIA collects data only on
terrestrial (land-based) solar energy systems, satellite and some military applications are
also excluded.
Definitions for terms used in this report can be found in EIA’s Energy Glossary:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/glossary/index.html. General information about all the EIA
surveys with data related to renewable energy and referenced in this report can be found
here: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oss/forms.html.
Table 1.1 U.S. Energy Consumption by Energy Source, 2003 - 2007 ...............................................................7
Table 1.2 Renewable Energy Consumption by Energy Use Sector and Energy Source, 2003 - 2007 ...............8
Table 1.3 Renewable Energy Consumption for Electricity Generation by Energy Use Sector and Energy
Source, 2003 - 2007..........................................................................................................................................10
Table 1.4 Renewable Energy Consumption for Nonelectric Use by Energy Use Sector and Energy Source,
2003 - 2007.......................................................................................................................................................11
Table 1.5a Historical Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Energy Source, 1989-1999 ................13
Table 1.5b Historical Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Energy Source, 2000-2007 ................15
Table 1.5a and 5b Historical Renewable Energy Consumption by Sector and Energy Source, 1989-2007.....17
Table 1.7 Waste Energy Consumption by Type of Waste and Energy Use Sector, 2007 ................................19
Table 1.8 Industrial Biomass Energy Consumption and Electricity Net Generation by Industry and Energy
Sources, 2007 ...................................................................................................................................................20
Table 1.9 Net Summer Capacity of Plants Cofiring Biomass and Coal, 2007 .................................................21
Table 1.11 Electricity Net Generation From Renewable Energy by Energy Use Sector and Energy Source,
2003 - 2007.......................................................................................................................................................23
Table 1.12 U.S. Electric Net Summer Capacity, 2003 - 2007 ..........................................................................24
Table 1.13 Renewable Electricity Net Generation by Energy Source and Census Division, 2007 ..................25
Table 1.14 Industrial Biomass Electricity Net Generation by Census Division and Energy Sources, 2007 ....26
Table 1.15 Renewable Electric Power Sector Net Generation by Energy Source and State, 2006 ..................27
Table 1.16 Renewable Commercial and Industrial Sector Net Generation by Energy Source and State, 200628
Table 1.17 Total Renewable Net Generation by Energy Source and State, 2006 ............................................29
Table 1.18 Renewable Electric Power Sector Net Generation by Energy Source and State, 2007 ..................30
Table 1.19 Renewable Commercial and Industrial Sector Net Generation by Energy Source and State, 200731
Table 1.20 Total Renewable Net Generation by Energy Source and State, 2007 ............................................32
Table 1.22 Renewable Commercial and Industrial Sector Net Summer Capacity by Energy Source and
State, 2006 ........................................................................................................................................................34
Table 1.23 Total Renewable Net Summer Capacity by Energy Source and State, 2006..................................35
Table 1.24 Renewable Electric Power Sector Net Summer Capacity by Energy Source and State, 2007 .......36
Table 1.25 Renewable Commercial and Industrial Sector Net Summer Capacity by Energy Source and
State, 2007 ........................................................................................................................................................37
Table 1.26 Total Renewable Net Summer Capacity by Energy Source and State, 2007..................................38
Table 1.27 Renewable Market Share of Net Generation by State, 2006 and 2007...........................................39
Table 1.28 Renewable Portfolio Standards and State Mandates by State, 2007...............................................40
Table 1.A1 Other Non-Renewable Energy Consumption by Energy Use Sector and Energy Source, 2003 -
2007..................................................................................................................................................................41
Table 1.A2 Other Non-Renewable Net Electricity Generation by Energy Use Sector and Energy Source,
2003 - 2007.......................................................................................................................................................42
Table 2.2 Annual Solar Thermal Collector Domestic Shipments, 1998 - 2007 ...............................................51
Table 2.3 Annual Shipments of Solar Thermal Collectors by Type, 1998 - 2007............................................52
Table 2.4 Shipments of Solar Thermal Collectors Ranked by Origin and Destination, 2007 ..........................53
Table 2.5 Shipments of Solar Thermal Collectors Ranked by Origin and Destination, 2006 ..........................54
Table 2.6 Shipments of Solar Thermal Collectors by Destination, 2006 and 2007..........................................55
Table 2.7 Import Shipments of Solar Thermal Collectors by Type, 1999 - 2007.............................................57
Table 2.8 Distribution of U.S. Solar Thermal Collector Imports by Country, 2006 and 2007.........................58
Table 2.9 Export Shipments of Solar Thermal Collectors by Type, 1999 - 2007.............................................59
Table 2.10 Distribution of U.S. Solar Thermal Collector Exports by Country, 2006 and 2007.......................60
Table 2.11 Distribution of Domestic Solar Thermal Collector Shipments by Customer Type, 2006 and 200762
Table 2.12 Solar Thermal Collector Shipments by Type, Quantity, Revenue, and Average Price, 2006 and
2007..................................................................................................................................................................63
Table 2.14 Average Thermal Performance Rating of Solar Thermal Collectors by Type Shipped in 2007.....65
Table 2.15 Shipments of Complete Solar Thermal Collector Systems, 2006 and 2007 ...................................66
Table 2.16 Number of Companies Expecting to Introduce New Solar Thermal Collector Products in 2008 ..67
Table 2.17 Percent of Solar Thermal Collector Shipments by the 10 Largest Companies, 1998 - 2007..........68
Table 2.18 Employment in the Solar Thermal Collector Industry, 1998 - 2007 ..............................................69
Table 2.19 Companies Involved in Solar Thermal Collector Related Activities by Type, 2006 and 2007 ......70
Table 2.20 Solar-Related Sales as a Percentage of Total Company Sales Revenue, 2006 and 2007 ...............71
Table 3.1 Annual Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules, 1998 - 2007 ...............................................79
Table 3.3 Annual Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules, 1998 - 2007 ...............................................81
Table 3.4 Distribution of Domestic Photovoltaic Cells and Modules by Customer Type, 2005 - 2007...........82
Table 3.5 Photovoltaic Cell and Module Shipments by Type, 2005 - 2007 .....................................................83
Table 3.6 Photovoltaic Cell and Module Shipment Revenue by Type, 2006 and 2007 ...................................84
Table 3.7 Domestic Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules by Market Sector, End Use, and Type,
2006 and 2007 ..................................................................................................................................................85
Table 3.8 Average Energy Conversion Efficiency of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules Shipped in 2007 ........86
Table 3.9 Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules by Origin, 2006 and 2007 .......................................87
Table 3.10 Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules by Destination, 2006 and 2007 .............................88
Table 3.11 Import Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules by Type, 1999 - 2007 ................................90
Table 3.12 Origin of U.S. Photovoltaic Cell and Module Import Shipments by Country, 2006 and 2007 ......91
Table 3.13 Export Shipments of Photovoltaic Cells and Modules by Type, 1999 - 2007 ................................92
Table 3.14 Destination of U.S. Photovoltaic Cell and Module Export Shipments by Country, 2006 and 200793
Table 3.16 Employment in the Photovoltaic Manufacturing Industry, 1998 - 2007 ........................................96
Table 3.17 Number of Companies Expecting to Introduce New Photovoltaic Products in 2008.....................97
Table 3.19 Photovoltaic-Related Sales as a Percentage of Total Company Sales Revenue, 2006 and 2007....99
Table 4.1 Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments by Model Type, 1999 - 2007 ..................................................106
Table 4.2 Rated Capacity of Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments by Model Type, 1999 - 2007 ....................107
Table 4.3 Average Cooling Efficiency for Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments, 2006 and 2007....................108
Table 4.4 Average Heating Efficiency for Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments, 2006 and 2007 ....................109
Table 4.5 Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments by Model Type, Quantity, Revenue, and Average Price, 2006
and 2007 .........................................................................................................................................................110
Table 4.6 Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments by Destination, 2006 and 2007...............................................111
Table 4.7 Distribution of U.S. Geothermal Heat Pump Exports by Country of Destination, 2006 and 2007 113
Table 4.8 Geothermal Heat Pump Shipments by Origin, 2006 and 2007.......................................................114
Table 4.9 Distribution of U.S. Geothermal Heat Pump Imports by Country of Origin, 2006 and 2007 ........115
Table 4.10 Geothermal Heat Pump Domestic Shipments by Customer Type and Model Type, 2006 and
2007................................................................................................................................................................116
Table 4.11 Geothermal Heat Pump Domestic Shipments by Sector and Model Type, 2007 .........................117
Table 4.12 Shipments of Complete Geothermal Heating/Cooling Systems, 2006 and 2007 .........................118
Table 4.13 Number of Companies Expecting to Introduce New Geothermal Heat Pump Products in 2008 .119
Table 4.14 Employment in the Geothermal Heat Pump Industry, 1998 - 2007..............................................120
Table 4.15 Companies Involved in Geothermal Heat Pump Activities by Type, 2006 and 2007 ..................121
Table 4.16 Geothermal Heat Pump-Related Sales as a Percentage of Total Company Sales Revenue, 2006
and 2007 .........................................................................................................................................................122
Table 4.17 Geothermal Direct Use of Energy and Heat Pumps, 1990 - 2007 ................................................123
Table 5.1 Estimated U.S. Green Pricing Customers by State and Customer Class, 2006 and 2007...............127
Table 5.2 Estimated U.S. Net Metering Customers by State and Customer Class, 2006 and 2007 ...............128
Figure 1.1 Renewable Energy Consumption in the Nation’s Energy Supply, 2007...........................................1
Figure 3.3 Crystalline Silicon Shipment and Thin-Film Shipment Market Shares, 1998-2007 .......................75
Figure 3.4 Photovoltaic Cell and Module Average Prices, 2003-2007 ............................................................76
Figure 1.1 Renewable Energy Consumption in the Nation’s Energy Supply, 2007
Biomass energy consumption stood at 3,596 trillion Btu or 53 percent of the renewable
energy market in 2007 (Table 1.2). Hydroelectric consumption was 2.446 trillion Btu or
36 percent of the market. Due to low water levels, that was the lowest level hydroelectric
has been since 2001 which was also a low water year (Table 1.5b).
Some of the fastest annual rates of growth in consumption were for wind (29 percent) and
ethanol (26 percent). By 2007 biofuels consumption (biomass for the transportation
sector, primarily ethanol and biodiesel, and related losses and coproducts in the industrial
sector) totaled more than 1,000 trillion Btu for the year (Figure 1.2). Wind consumption
was 341 trillion Btu in 2007, all of it in the electric power sector.
For 2007 the share of total renewable energy used for electricity production was just 54
percent or 3,699 trillion Btu. Ninety-four percent of renewable energy consumed for
electricity generation in 2007 was by electric utilities and independent power producers
in the electric power sector; just 6 percent was in the industrial sector.1
Renewable energy consumed for nonelectric uses increased by 240 trillion Btu to 3,114
trillion Btu, or almost 46 percent of total renewable energy consumption (Tables 1.2 and
1.4). Nonelectric uses include applications such as wood for space heating, noncentral
station solar, process heat from biomass for manufacturers, geothermal heat pumps and
direct use of geothermal. While a small portion of the 240 trillion Btu increase between
2006 and 2007 was increased consumption of wood for heating in the residential sector,
most of the increase was for biofuels consumption in the transportation sector and the
related biofuel feedstocks in the industrial sector.
Ethanol consumption increased 26 percent from 462 to 580 trillion Btu in 2007, or 6,886
million gallons, an amount that easily exceeded the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS)
established by the Energy Policy Act (EPACT) 2005 (Table 1.6). The Energy
Independence and Security Act (EISA) passed in December 2007 raised the RFS. But
unfavorable market conditions in the recession of 2008-2009 may limit the industry’s
response. By early 2009 fully 9 percent of all ethanol plants in the U.S. had filed for
bankruptcy.2
1
See the data revisions section at the end of this chapter for an explanation of changes in methodology to
estimate energy consumption for electricity and energy consumption for useful thermal output at combined
heat and power (CHP) plants. This change was implemented starting with 2004 data and continues.
2
Energy Tribune, “Ethanol Bankruptcies Continue, 14 Studies Have Exposed the High Cost of Ethanol and
Biofuels,” February 4, 2009. See: http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=1281 .
Biomass waste consumption stood at 430 trillion Btu for 2007, up from 414 trillion Btu in
2006 (Tables 1.2 and 1.7). More than half was consumed by independent power
producers. Landfill gas and MSW biogenic provided the largest shares (40 and 38 percent
respectively).
Industrial biomass consumption was only slightly higher at 2,012 trillion Btu in 2007
than in 2006 (Tables 1.2 and 1.8). Biomass consumption by the paper and allied products
industries accounted for 59 percent of this, followed by biorefineries with 19 percent.
Sixty-two power plants with total generating capacity of 8,121 megawatts (MW) reported
having 5,080 MW of capacity capable of cofiring biomass and coal (Table 1.9).
Electricity
Renewable energy provided about 353 billion kilowatthours of electricity in 2007, down
9 percent from the year before, mainly due to a decrease in hydroelectric power
generation partially offset by an increase in wind (Table 1.11 and Figure 1.3). In
contrast, total U.S. generation increased over 2 percent year to year to 4,157 billion
kilowatthours. Most of that increase was provided by natural gas.3 As a result
renewable’s share of total U.S. generation stood at 8.5 percent in 2007, down from 9.5
percent in 2006, while the nonhydro renewable share of generation moved from 2.4 to 2.5
percent (Table 1.27).
3
Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Annual 2007 (Washington, DC, January 2009), table
1.1. See: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html .
Total U.S. electric net summer capacity grew by a net 8,673 megawatts (MW) between
2006 and 2007 (Table 1.12). The main drivers of this change were increases of 5,186
MW for wind and 4,582 MW for natural gas, which were partially offset by a decrease of
2,029 MW for petroleum.4 There was also an increase of 341 MW for landfill gas
capacity, but a large share of it was as a result of improving EIA’s coverage in its power
plant survey database for 2007. In addition, there was a 332 MW increase in capacity
primarily using wood and derived fuels. Central station solar thermal/PV capacity
increased 91 MW or 22 percent. A major share of this increase was the 64 MW Nevada
Solar One plant in Boulder City.
Table 1.13 shows that hydroelectric conventional generation was concentrated in the
Pacific Contiguous Division, where it accounted for 82 percent of the renewable
electricity provided to that market. Geothermal and solar/PV generation was found
mainly in the Pacific Contiguous and Mountain Divisions, while electricity from the
remaining renewable sources tended to be scattered across the nation. Table 1.14 shows
that generation from biomass including black liquor and wood/wood waste solids was
concentrated largely in the three southern Census Divisions.
State Electricity
4
Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Annual 2007 (Washington, DC, January 2009), table
2.1. See: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html .
In 2007, Texas strengthened its position as the nation’s leader in installed wind capacity.
By the end of the year, Texas wind capacity increased by 1,752 MW to 4,490 MW
(Tables 1.23 and 1.26). But Texas was hardly alone; 17 other states expanded wind
capacity and three of those ( Maine, Massachusetts, and Missouri) added wind capacity
for the first time. While built on a smaller scale, solar power had some interesting
developments too, notably outside of California. Of the 91 MW increase nationally
Nevada accounted for 79 MW. That included the new Nevada Solar One 64 MW solar
thermal power plant and the Nellis Air Force 14 MW photovoltaic plant. Colorado also
added the SunE Alomosa 8 MW photovoltaic project.
Whether this kind of growth will continue is debatable. Preliminary data for 2008
indicates that wind capacity did continue its rapid expansion through the year. In fact,
the U.S may have reached first place for wind capacity worldwide, surpassing Germany.
However by early 2009, industry sources reported that “new projects and new orders for
turbines and components slowed to a trickle as the financial crisis hit the wind sector,” so
the future is uncertain.5
One of the ways states support renewable energy development is with renewable
portfolio standards (RPS) or state mandates. In 2008 three states (Ohio, South Dakota,
and Utah) adopted this type of provision for the first time and three others (Illinois,
Michigan, and Missouri) changed from voluntary to required standards. By the end of
2008 there were 35 states spread across the country with an RPS or state mandate (Table
1.28).
Federal Legislation
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was signed into law in February
2009 to stimulate the American economy. Among the provisions supporting renewable
energy were:
• Extension of the wind energy production tax credit (PTC) to 2012 and the PTC
for municipal solid waste, qualified hydropower, biomass and geothermal energy
to 2013. The wind PTC had been set to expire by the end of 2009.
• Two-year extension of the PTC for marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy
systems through 2013.
• Alternatively, the Act allows owners of non-solar renewable energy facilities to
make an irrevocable election to earn a 30 percent investment credit rather than the
5
See Global Wind Energy Council, Press Release, “U.S. and China in race to top of global wind industry”
(February 2, 2009), here: http://www.gwec.net/ and PV News, “2009 PV Market Opens with Signs of
Trouble” (February 2009).
Data Revisions
For the EIA’s Electric Power Annual 2007 and this report, EIA adopted a new method of
allocating fuel consumption between electric power generation and useful thermal output
(UTO) for combined heat and power (CHP) plants. The new method proportionately
distributes a CHP plant’s losses between the two output products (electric power and
UTO), assuming the same efficiency for production of electricity as UTO.6 The change
is reflected from 2004 onwards. For 2006 using the old methodology the percent of
renewable energy used for generating electricity was 61 percent; using the new
methodology it is less – 58 percent – as expected (Tables 1.2 and 1.3).7
6
In historical data, UTO was consistently assumed to be 80 percent efficient and all other losses at the
plant were allocated to production of electric power.
7
For 2006 see Energy Information Administration, Renewable Energy Trends in Consumption and
Electricity 2006 (Washington, DC, July 2008), Table 1.2 and table 1.3. See:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/fuelrenewable.html .
3
Difference between the energy in biodiesel feedstocks (principally soy bean oil) and the energy in biodiesel consumed in the
transportation sector.
4
Difference between energy in ethanol feedstocks (primarily corn) and its coproducts (wet and dry distiller grains), and the
energy in ethanol consumed in the transportation sector.
5
Includes paper and paper board, wood, food, leather, textiles and yard trimmings.
6
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
7
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
8
Wood and wood pellet fuels.
9
Includes small amounts of distributed solar thermal and photovoltaic energy used in the commercial, industrial and electric
power sectors.
10
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American
Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
* = Less than 500 billion Btu.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Data revisions are discussed in the Highlights section.
Revisions to biomass removed MSW non-biogenic and tires from renewable waste energy.
Sources: Analysis conducted by Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels
and specific sources described as follows. Residential: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-457A/G, "Residential
Energy Consumption Survey;" Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center; and Energy Information Administration,
Form EIA-63-A, "Annual Solar Thermal Collector Manufacturers Survey" and Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic
Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey." Commercial: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-906, "Power Plant
Report," Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report;"
and Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center. Industrial: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-846 (A, B,
C) "Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey," Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat
and Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report;" and Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-
Heat Center; Government Advisory Associates, Resource Recovery Yearbook and Methane Recovery Yearbook;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Landfill Methane Outreach Program estimates; and losses and coproducts from the
production of biodiesel and ethanol calculated as the difference between energy in feedstocks and production. Biofuels for
Transportation: Biodiesel: 2001-2005: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Credit Corporation, Bioenergy Program
estimates of production assigned to consumption and 2006 and forward: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census,
Current Industrial Reports, Fats and Oils - Production, Consumption and Stocks, and Ethanol: 2001-2004: EIA, Petroleum
Supply Annual, Tables 2 and 16. Calculated as ten percent of oxygenated finished motor gasoline field production (Table 2)
plus fuel ethanol refinery input (Table 16). 2005-2007: EIA Petroleum Supply Annual (Various Issues), Tables 1 and 15.
Calculated as motor gasoline blending components adustments (Table 1), plus finished motor gasoline adjustments (Table 1),
plus fuel ethanol refinery and blender net inputs (Table 15). Small amounts of ethanol consumption are distributed to the
commercial and industrial sectors according to those sector`s shares of U.S. motor gasoline supplied. Electric Power: Energy
Information Administration, Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant
Report," and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report."
8
Wood and wood pellet fuels.
9
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American
Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the
public.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
* = Less than 500 billion Btu.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding. Starting with 2004 EIA adopted a new
method of allocating fuel consumption between electric power generation and useful thermal out put (UTO) for
combined heat and power (CHP) plants. The new method proportionately distributes a CHP plant`s losses between
the two output products (electric power and UTO) assuming the same efficiency for production of electricity as UTO.
Data revisions are discussed in the Highlights section.
Revisions to biomass removed MSW non-biogenic and tires from renewable waste energy.
Sources: Analysis conducted by Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate
Fuels and specific sources described as follows. Residential: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-457A/G,
"Residential Energy Consumption Survey;" Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center; and Energy
Information Administration, Form EIA-63-A, "Annual Solar Thermal Collector Manufacturers Survey" and Form
EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey." Commercial: Energy Information
Administration, Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report" and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant
Operations Report;" and Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center. Industrial: Energy Information
Administration, Form EIA-846 (A, B, C) "Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey," Form EIA-920, "Combined
Heat and Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report;" Oregon Institute of Technology,
Geo-Heat Center; Government Advisory Associates, Resource Recovery Yearbook and Methane Recovery Yearbook;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Landfill Methane Outreach Program estimates; and losses and coproducts
from the production of biodiesel and ethanol calculated as the difference between energy in feedstocks and
production. Biofuels for Transportation: Biodiesel: 2001-2005: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Credit
Corporation, Bioenergy Program estimates of production assigned to consumption and 2006 and forward: U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Current Industrial Reports, Fats and Oils - Production, Consumption
and Stocks, and Ethanol: 2001-2004: EIA, Petroleum Supply Annual, Tables 2 and 16. Calculated as ten percent of
oxygenated finished motor gasoline field production (Table 2) plus fuel ethanol refinery input (Table 16). 2005-2007:
EIA Petroleum Supply Annual (Various Issues), Tables 1 and 15.
Calculated as motor gasoline blending components adustments (Table 1), plus finished motor gasoline adjustments
(Table 1), plus fuel ethanol refinery and blender net inputs (Table 15). Small amounts of ethanol consumption are
distributed to the commercial and industrial sectors according to those sector`s shares of U.S. motor gasoline
supplied. Electric Power: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant
Report," and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report."
Total 6.391 6.206 6.238 5.993 6.262 6.155 6.705 7.168 7.178 6.657 6.681
Biomass 3.160 2.735 2.782 2.933 2.910 3.030 3.104 3.159 3.108 2.931 2.967
Biofuels1 0.126 0.111 0.129 0.146 0.171 0.190 0.202 0.145 0.187 0.205 0.213
Waste2 0.354 0.408 0.440 0.473 0.479 0.515 0.531 0.577 0.551 0.542 0.540
Wood and Derived Fuels3 2.680 2.216 2.214 2.313 2.260 2.324 2.370 2.437 2.371 2.184 2.214
Geothermal 0.317 0.336 0.346 0.349 0.364 0.338 0.294 0.316 0.325 0.328 0.331
Hydroelectric Conventional 2.837 3.046 3.016 2.617 2.892 2.683 3.205 3.590 3.640 3.297 3.268
Solar/PV4 0.055 0.060 0.063 0.064 0.066 0.069 0.070 0.071 0.070 0.070 0.069
Wind 0.022 0.029 0.031 0.030 0.031 0.036 0.033 0.033 0.034 0.031 0.046
Residential 0.978 0.641 0.674 0.706 0.618 0.590 0.591 0.612 0.503 0.452 0.462
Biomass 0.920 0.580 0.610 0.640 0.550 0.520 0.520 0.540 0.430 0.380 0.390
Wood and Derived Fuels 0.920 0.580 0.610 0.640 0.550 0.520 0.520 0.540 0.430 0.380 0.390
Geothermal 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.009
Solar/PV4 0.053 0.056 0.058 0.060 0.062 0.064 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.065 0.064
Commercial 0.102 0.098 0.100 0.109 0.114 0.112 0.118 0.135 0.138 0.127 0.129
Biomass 0.099 0.094 0.095 0.105 0.109 0.106 0.113 0.129 0.131 0.118 0.121
Biofuels5 0.001 0.001 * * * * * * * * *
Waste2 0.022 0.028 0.026 0.032 0.033 0.035 0.040 0.053 0.058 0.054 0.054
Wood and Derived Fuels3 0.076 0.066 0.068 0.072 0.076 0.072 0.072 0.076 0.073 0.064 0.067
Geothermal 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.007
Hydroelectric Conventional 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Industrial 1.870 1.716 1.683 1.737 1.772 1.927 1.992 2.033 2.058 1.931 1.936
Biomass 1.840 1.683 1.651 1.704 1.740 1.862 1.935 1.970 1.997 1.873 1.883
Biofuels6 0.056 0.049 0.057 0.064 0.075 0.083 0.087 0.062 0.082 0.090 0.093
Waste2 0.200 0.192 0.185 0.179 0.181 0.199 0.195 0.224 0.184 0.180 0.171
Wood and Derived Fuels3 1.584 1.442 1.410 1.461 1.484 1.580 1.652 1.683 1.731 1.603 1.620
Geothermal 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004
Hydroelectric Conventional 0.028 0.031 0.030 0.031 0.030 0.062 0.055 0.061 0.058 0.055 0.049
Solar/PV - - - - - - - - - - -
Wind - - - - - - - - - - -
Transportation 0.069 0.062 0.072 0.081 0.096 0.107 0.115 0.082 0.104 0.115 0.120
Biomass 0.069 0.062 0.072 0.081 0.096 0.107 0.115 0.082 0.104 0.115 0.120
Biofuels7 0.069 0.062 0.072 0.081 0.096 0.107 0.115 0.082 0.104 0.115 0.120
Electric Power8 3.372 3.689 3.710 3.360 3.662 3.420 3.889 4.305 4.375 4.032 4.034
Electric Utilities 2.983 3.151 3.114 2.712 2.953 2.714 3.173 3.553 3.620 3.279 3.123
Biomass 0.020 0.022 0.021 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.017 0.020 0.020 0.021 0.020
Waste2 0.010 0.013 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.013 0.010 0.012 0.013 0.013 0.013
Wood and Derived Fuels3 0.010 0.008 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.007 0.007
Geothermal 0.197 0.181 0.170 0.169 0.158 0.145 0.099 0.110 0.115 0.109 0.036
Hydroelectric Conventional 2.765 2.948 2.923 2.521 2.774 2.549 3.056 3.423 3.485 3.149 3.067
Solar/PV * * * * * * * * * * *
Wind * * * * * * * * * * *
Independent Power Producers 0.389 0.538 0.596 0.648 0.709 0.705 0.716 0.752 0.754 0.753 0.910
Biomass 0.211 0.295 0.333 0.381 0.394 0.413 0.405 0.418 0.426 0.424 0.433
Waste2 0.122 0.175 0.215 0.249 0.253 0.269 0.286 0.288 0.296 0.294 0.302
Wood and Derived Fuels3 0.089 0.120 0.118 0.132 0.141 0.144 0.119 0.130 0.129 0.129 0.131
Geothermal 0.111 0.145 0.165 0.168 0.193 0.180 0.181 0.191 0.194 0.202 0.276
Hydroelectric Conventional 0.043 0.066 0.062 0.065 0.087 0.072 0.093 0.104 0.096 0.092 0.151
Solar/PV 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005
Wind 0.022 0.029 0.031 0.030 0.031 0.036 0.033 0.033 0.034 0.031 0.046
Electric Power8 3.579 2.910 3.445 3.601 3.503 3.568 3.827 3.508
Electric Utilities 2.607 2.063 2.529 2.615 2.522 2.530 2.688 2.356
Biomass 0.021 0.014 0.033 0.029 0.031 0.040 0.042 0.048
Waste2 0.014 0.008 0.022 0.012 0.011 0.013 0.015 0.016
Wood and Derived Fuels3 0.007 0.006 0.011 0.017 0.020 0.027 0.027 0.032
Geothermal 0.003 0.003 0.029 0.026 0.026 0.024 0.024 0.024
Hydroelectric Conventional 2.582 2.044 2.465 2.556 2.461 2.455 2.598 2.241
Solar/PV * * * * * * * *
Wind * 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.004 0.010 0.023 0.043
Independent Power Producers 0.972 0.847 0.916 0.986 0.981 1.038 1.139 1.152
Biomass 0.432 0.323 0.347 0.368 0.357 0.365 0.370 0.376
Waste2 0.305 0.202 0.208 0.218 0.212 0.208 0.216 0.221
Wood and Derived Fuels3 0.127 0.121 0.140 0.151 0.145 0.158 0.154 0.154
Geothermal 0.293 0.286 0.275 0.277 0.285 0.285 0.282 0.284
Hydroelectric Conventional 0.185 0.165 0.185 0.224 0.196 0.215 0.242 0.189
Solar/PV 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.006
Wind 0.057 0.068 0.103 0.111 0.138 0.168 0.240 0.297
1
Biofuels and biofuel losses and coproducts.
2
Municipal solid waste biogenic, landfill gases, agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases. Includes municipal solid waste nonbiogenic and tires for 1989-2000.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
4
Includes small amounts of distributed solar thermal and photovoltaic energy used in the commercial, industrial and electric power sectors.
5
Ethanol primarily derived from corn.
6
Ethanol primarily derived from corn and losses and coproducts from production of biodiesel and ethanol.
7
Biodiesel primarily derived from soy bean oil and ethanol primarily derived from corn.
8
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose primary business is to sell electricity, or
electricity and heat, to the public.
PV = Photovoltaic.
* = Less than 500 billion Btu.
- = No data reported.
Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Sources: Analysis conducted by Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels and Specific sources described as follows. Residential: Energy Information
Administration, Form EIA-457A/G, "Residential Energy Consumption Survey;"Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center and Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63-A, "Annual Solar
Thermal Collector Manufacturers Survey" and Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey." Commercial: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-867, "Annual Nonutility
Power Producer Report," Form EIA-860B, " Annual Electric Generator Report - Nonutility," Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report," Form EIA-923,
"Power Plant Operations Report;" and Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center.Industrial: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-846 (A,B,C) "Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey,"
Form EIA-867, "Annual Nonutility Power Producer Report," Form EIA-860B, "Annual Electric Generator Report - Nonutility," Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report", Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and
Power Report," Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report;" Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo-Heat Center; Government Advisory Associates, Resource Recovery Yearbook and Methane Recovery
Yearbook;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Landfill Methane Outreach Program estimates; and losses and coproducts from the production of biodiesel and ethanol calculated as the difference between energy in
feedstocks and production. Biofuels for Transportation: Biodiesel: 2001-2005: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Commodity Credit Corporation, Bioenergy Program estimates of production assigned to
consumption and 2006 and forward: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Current Industrial Reports, Fats and Oils - Production, Consumption and Stocks, and Ethanol: 1989: EIA, Estimates of
U.S. Biofuels Consumption 1990, Table 10, 1990-1992: EIA, Estimates of U.S. Biomass Energy Consumption 1992, Table D2, 1993-2004: EIA, Petroleum Supply Monthly, Tables 2 and 16. Calculated as ten
percent of oxygenated finished motor gasoline field production (Table 2) plus fuel ethanol refinery input (Table 16).2005-2007: EIA Petroleum Supply Annual (Various Issues), Tables 1 and 15. Calculated as
motor gasoline blending components adjustments (Table 1), plus finished motor gasoline adjustments (Table 1), plus fuel ethanol refinery and blender net inputs (Table 15).
Small amounts of ethanol consumption are distributed to the commercial and industrial sectors according to those sector`s shares of U.S. motor gasoline supplied. Electric Power: Energy Information
Administration, Form EIA-759, "Monthly Power Plant Report," Form EIA-867, "Annual Nonutility Power Producer Report," Form EIA-860B, " Annual Electric Generator Report - Nonutility," Form EIA-906,
"Monthly Power Plant Report," Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report."
Ethanol
Feedstock1 410 497 570 712 930
Losses and Coproducts2 174 210 241 301 380
Production3 236 287 329 412 549
4
Net Imports 1 13 11 62 37
Stock Change5 -1 * -2 11 6
Consumption 238 299 342 462 580
Biodiesel
Feedstock6 2 4 12 32 63
Losses and Coproducts7 * * * * 1
Production8 2 4 12 32 62
1
Total corn and other biomass inputs to the production of fuel ethanol.
2
Losses and co-products from the production of fuel ethanol. Does not include natural gas, electricity, and other non-
biomass energy used in the production of fuel ethanol.
3
Fuel ethanol production.
4
Fuel ethanol imports. There are no exports.
5
Fuel ethanol stock change. A negative number indicates a decrease in stocks and a positive number indicates an increase.
6
Total soy bean oil and other biomass inputs to the production of biodiesel.
7
Losses and co-products from the production of biodiesel. Does not include natural gas, electricity, and other non-
biomass energy used in the production of biodiesel.
8
Production of biofuels for use as diesel fuel substitutes or additives. Biodiesel consumption equals biodiesel production.
* = Less than 0.5 trillion Btu.
Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Sources: (Note: For ethanol and biodiesel heat contents, see Table 10.) Ethanol Feedstock: Calculated as fuel ethanol production
multiplied by the approximate heat content of the corn and other biomass inputs to the production of fuel ethanol. Ethanol Losses and
Co-products: Calculated as ethanol feedstock minus fuel ethanol production. Ethanol Production: 2002 and forward: Energy
Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-819, "Monthly Oxygenate Report," and predecessor form. Ethanol Net Imports, Stocks
and Stock Change: 2002-2005: EIA, Petroleum Supply Annual (PSA), annual reports. 2006: EIA, Petroleum Supply Monthly (PSM),
monthly reports. Ethanol Consumption: 2002-2004: EIA, PSA, annual reports, Tables 2 and 16. Calculated as ten percent of
oxygenated finished motor gasoline field production (Table 2), plus fuel ethanol refinery input (Table 16). 2005-2007: EIA, PSA
(Various Issues), Tables 1 and 15.
Calculated as motor gasoline blending components adjustments (Table 1), plus finished motor gasoline adjustments (Table 1), plus
fuel ethanol refinery blender net inputs (Table 15). Biodiesel Feedstock: Calcualted as biodiesel production multiplied by the
approximate heat content of the vegetable oil and other biomass inputs to the production of biodiesel. Biodiesel Losses and Co-
products: Calculated as biodiesel feedstock minus biodiesel production. Biodiesel Production: 2001-2005 U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Commodity Credit Corporation, Bioenergy Program records and 2006 and forward: U.S. Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Census, Current Industrial Reports, Fats and Oils - Production, Consumption and Stocks, and analysis conducted by Energy
Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels.
Total 6,157,750 8,303,838 2,062,966 39,014,024 14,637,213 247,509,974 611,793 34,449,927 352,747,486
New England 394,977 1,943,271 78,898 5,391,892 - 6,815,108 - 109,582 14,733,728
Middle Atlantic 1,104,706 2,600,360 24,057 1,111,828 - 27,509,447 - 1,323,906 33,674,303
East North Central 1,723,434 257,066 49,068 2,876,659 - 3,800,171 - 791,181 9,497,579
West North Central 256,007 358,319 207,085 727,590 - 7,401,115 - 7,535,581 16,485,697
South Atlantic 592,421 2,606,046 637,049 10,768,125 - 11,085,581 - 167,588 25,856,811
East South Central 116,188 - 53,460 6,510,550 - 10,744,302 - 49,937 17,474,436
West South Central 355,710 3,721 135,809 5,669,471 - 8,773,694 - 10,855,527 25,793,931
Mountain 53,583 5,954 51,582 591,526 1,416,616 30,252,605 54,824 4,107,679 36,534,369
Pacific Contiguous 1,560,725 359,651 699,936 5,366,361 12,990,711 139,744,385 556,969 9,269,751 170,548,489
Pacific Noncontiguous - 169,450 126,023 s 229,886 1,383,566 - 239,196 2,148,143
1
Includes paper and paper board, wood, food, leather, textiles and yard trimmings.
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
s = Less than 500 kilowatthours.
- = No data reported.
Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report," and predecessor forms: Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant
Report."
Total 1,975,026 653,064 1,686,598 506,949 9,434,098 6,358,302 5,699,297 516,242 2,072,464 16,786 28,918,826
Agricultural Byproducts/Crops - - - 13,507 167,595 5,017 19,291 - - 6,590 211,999
Black Liquor 836,436 481,823 1,044,402 322,214 6,746,917 4,257,883 3,683,644 335,015 635,531 - 18,343,866
Landfill Gases - - 22,162 - 1,404 3,520 - - - - 27,087
MSW Biogenic - - - - 36,061 - 3,721 - - - 39,782
Other Biomass Gases - - 3,197 7,245 - - - - - - 10,442
Other Biomass Liquids s 712 - - s - s - - 10,196 11,302
Other Biomass Solids s - 14,847 - 93,399 - - - - - 108,724
Sludge Waste 38,564 2,613 10,737 7,587 55,654 48,443 6,712 - 51,805 - 222,115
Wood/Wood Waste Liquids - 66,331 - - - - - - - - 66,331
Wood/Wood Waste Solids 1,099,354 101,584 591,252 156,396 2,332,970 2,043,439 1,985,827 181,226 1,385,129 - 9,877,177
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
s = Less than 500 kilowatthours.
- = No data reported.
Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report," and predecessor forms: Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report."
U.S. Total 12,962,784 964,648 10,341,481 14,568,029 286,253,922 507,706 26,589,137 352,187,707
1
Includes landfill gas and MSW biogenic (paper and paper board, wood, food, leather, textiles and yard trimmings).
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
s = Less than 500 kilowatthours.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass removed MSW non-biogenic and tires from renewable waste energy.
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose
primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report."
U.S. Total 14,154,611 1,943,913 38,762,096 14,568,029 289,246,416 507,706 26,589,137 385,771,908
1
Includes landfill gas and MSW biogenic (paper and paper board, wood, food, leather, textiles and yard trimmings).
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
s = Less than 500 kilowatthours.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass removed MSW non-biogenic and tires from renewable waste energy.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report."
U.S. Total 13,229,677 1,064,627 10,711,288 14,637,213 245,842,714 611,793 34,449,927 320,547,239
1
Includes landfill gas and MSW biogenic (paper and paper board, wood, food, leather, textiles and yard trimmings).
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
s = Less than 500 kilowatthours.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass removed MSW non-biogenic and tires from renewable waste energy.
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose
primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report," and predecessor forms: Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-
920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report."
U.S. Total 14,461,588 2,062,966 39,014,024 14,637,213 247,509,974 611,793 34,449,927 352,747,486
1
Includes landfill gas and MSW biogenic (paper and paper board, wood, food, leather, textiles and yard trimmings).
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
s = Less than 500 kilowatthours.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass removed MSW non-biogenic and tires from renewable waste energy.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report," and predecessor forms: Form EIA-906, "Power Plant Report," and Form EIA-
920, "Combined Heat and Power Plant Report."
U.S. Total 2,812 282 1,677 2,274 77,104 411 11,329 95,888
1
Total capacity whose primary energy source is landfill gas or MSW.
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass capacity removed tires from renewable waste energy.
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose
primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report."
U.S. Total 3,166 561 6,372 2,274 77,821 411 11,329 101,934
1
Total capacity whose primary energy source is landfill gas or MSW.
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass capacity removed tires from renewable waste energy.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report."
U.S. Total 3,176 364 1,694 2,214 77,532 501 16,515 101,996
1
Total capacity whose primary energy source is landfill gas or MSW.
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass capacity removed tires from renewable waste energy.
The electric power sector comprises electricity-only and combined-heat-power (CHP) plants within North American Classification System (NAICS) 22 category whose
primary business is to sell electricity, or electricity and heat, to the public.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report."
U.S. Total 3,536 598 6,704 2,214 77,885 502 16,515 107,954
1
Total capacity whose primary energy source is landfill gas or MSW.
2
Agriculture byproducts/crops, sludge waste, and other biomass solids, liquids and gases.
3
Black liquor, and wood/woodwaste solids and liquids.
MSW = Municipal Solid Waste.
PV = Photovoltaic.
- = No data reported.
Notes: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Revisions to biomass capacity removed tires from renewable waste energy.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-860, "Annual Electric Generator Report."
RPS or
State
Mandate
Alabama -
Alaska -
Arizona X
Arkansas -
California X
Colorado X
Connecticut X
Delaware X
District of Columbia X
Florida1 X
Georgia -
Hawaii X
Idaho -
Illinois X
Indiana -
Iowa X
Kansas -
Kentucky -
Lousiana -
Maine X
Maryland X
Massachusetts X
Michigan X
Minnesota X
Mississippi -
Missouri X
Montana X
Nebraska -
Nevada X
New Hampshire X
New Jersey X
New Mexico X
New York X
North Carolina X
North Dakota X
Ohio X
Oklahoma -
Oregon X
Pennsylvania X
Rhode Island X
South Carolina -
South Dakota X
Tennessee -
Texas X
Utah X
Vermont X
Virginia X
Washington X
West Virginia -
Wisconsin X
Wyoming -
1
In Florida the RPS is not statewide.
- = No RPS or state mandate for that state.
Note: In some states, including North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Virginia, the renewable portfolio
standard (RPS) is voluntary.
Source: North Carolina Solar Center, Database of State Incentives for Renewable Energy (DSIRE) website:
http://www.dsireusa.org (January 28, 2009).
Overview
After 3 years of rapid growth, solar thermal collector shipments reported to EIA declined
substantially in 2007 (Figure 2.1). Growth during 2003-2006 was largely due to the rise
in energy prices, concerns about global warming and dependence on foreign sources for
oil, and the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, H.R. 6111. This Act extended the
solar investment tax credit for one additional year through December 31, 2008.8
Simultaneously however, many foreign solar companies have been eyeing U.S. solar
thermal market investment opportunities. They believe that the U.S. solar thermal market
is poised to take off, especially utility-scale solar thermal power and domestic solar water
heating. As a result, these companies began seriously competing for the U.S. solar
thermal market in 2007. This is likely a factor in the slowdown in the U.S. solar thermal
collector market experienced in 2007, and it is not yet clear whether this is the beginning
of a general decline or merely a brief interruption in a long-term upward trend.
Industry Status
The 60 companies reporting solar thermal collector shipments in 2007 also reported being
involved in one or more of the following solar-related activities:
8
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 established tax credits to homes and businesses that install solar thermal
systems (The tax credit does not apply to solar water heating for swimming pools or hot tubs). Initially
scheduled to expire on December 31, 2007, they were extended through December 31, 2008, by Section
206 of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (H.R. 6111)
22,000
20,000
Thousand Square Feet
18,000
16,000
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-63A, "Annual Solar Thertmal Collector Manufacturers Survey."
Of the 60 companies active in 2007, nine are planning to introduce new low-temperature
collectors, 17 are planning new medium-temperature collectors, and 10 expect to
introduce new high-temperature collectors in 2008 (Table 2.16). This latter statistic is
particularly significant, as it indicates efforts are underway to develop collectors for
utility-scale power.
Thirty-six companies had 90 percent or more of their total company-wide sales revenue
in solar collectors, 9 companies had 50 to 89 percent, 8 companies had 10 to 49 percent,
and 7 companies had less than 10 percent (Table 2.20).
In 2007, the solar thermal industry remained highly concentrated, with the 5 largest
companies accounting for 86 percent of total shipments. However, this concentration
was the lowest since 1998 (Table 2.17). The drop is likely due to new firms developing
new products for utility scale power plants.
Solar thermal collectors are divided into the categories of low-, medium-, and high-
temperature collectors.
Annual shipments of solar thermal collectors totaled 15.2 million square feet in 2007,
more than a 27-percent decrease from the 2006 shipments of 20.7 million square feet, and
lower than the 16.0 million square feet shipped in 2005 (Table 2.1).
In 2007, low-temperature collector shipments totaled 13.3 million square feet, which is
2.2 million square feet less than low-temperature collector shipments in 2006 (Figure 2.2
and Table 2.3). Approximately 99 percent of low-temperature collectors are used for
residential solar thermal pool heating (Table 2.13). Several solar thermal pool heating
manufacturers described the 2007 solar swimming pool heating market as flat, slow, or
even declining due to the poor economy. While the effect of the economy and the
housing slowdown on the low-temperature market is not yet clear, the future of
residential solar thermal pool heating sales is a matter of concern for manufacturers.
Shipments of medium-temperature collectors totaled slightly less than 1.8 million square
feet in 2007, a 34-percent increase from the 2006 shipments of 1.3 million square feet in
2006 (Figure 2.2 and Table 2.3). Approximately 80 percent of medium-temperature
collectors are used for hot water heating (Table 2.13). The increase in medium-
temperature collectors is believed to be mainly due to the Federal tax credits and state
9
One sun: Natural solar insolation falling on an object without concentration or diffusion of the solar rays
In contrast to the market during 2007 when no solar thermal power plants were started, a
handful of commitments to build concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were announced
during 2007.10 The wave of announced plans to build new large solar power facilities
throughout the United States seems to indicate that relatively large-scale systems could
become more common. As of July 2008, the Federal Bureau of Land Management has
processed 125 applications for future potential solar development on public lands and
will continue to accept applications.11
16,000
Low-Temperature
14,000
Medium-Temperature
12,000
Thousand Square Feet
High-Temperature
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-63A, "Annual Solar Thermal Collector Manufacturers Survey."
10
See page 23 to 26 EIA Renewable Energy Trends in Consumption and Electricity (Issue in Focus:
Central Station Solar Thermal Electricity) for an overview of the completed and proposed CSP projects
released July, 2008
11
In response to public interest in solar energy development, the Bureau of Land Management has
announced plans to continue accepting applications for future potential solar development on public lands.
Sluggish shipments adversely affected revenue. The total revenue of solar thermal
collector shipments was $ 59.8 million in 2007 (Table 2.12). This was an almost 51
percent decrease, compared with the revenue of total shipments in 2006, caused by the
sharp drop in high-temperature collector shipments.
The average price for low-temperature collectors was $1.97 per square foot in 2007,
virtually unchanged from $1.95 in 2006. The average price for medium- and high-
temperature collectors increased from $17.47 to $18.33 per square foot. However, the
overall average price for total shipments decreased more than 32 percent, from $5.84 per
square foot in 2006 to $3.95 per square foot in 2007 (Figure 2.3 and Table 2.12). The
cause of the fluctuation was heavily influenced by custom-made collectors, which are
high-temperature collectors. These collectors are designed for limited, specialized
applications, and their average prices are much higher than the conventional collectors.
6.00
5.60
5.20
Dollars Per Square Foot
4.80
4.40
4.00
3.60
3.20
2.80
2.40
2.00
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-63A, "Solar Thermal Collector Manufacturers Survey."
The residential sector is the largest domestic market in the United States for solar thermal
collectors. Solar thermal collectors shipped to the residential sector in 2007 totaled 12.8
million square feet, approximately 93 percent of total domestic shipments (Table 2.13).
This market sector primarily involves the use of low-temperature solar collectors for pool
heating and medium-temperature solar collectors for water heating. The second largest
domestic market for solar thermal collectors in 2007 was the commercial sector, which
accounted for 7 percent of total domestic shipments.
The largest end use for solar thermal collectors shipped in 2007 was for swimming pool
heating. Pool heating accounted for 88 percent of the total domestic shipments. The
second-largest end use in 2007 was for domestic hot water heating, which accounted for
10 percent of the total domestic shipments (Table 2.13).
More than half (56 percent) of the total domestic shipments in 2007 were sent to the
wholesale market, 33 percent to retail distribution, 3 percent to exporters, 6 percent to
installers, and about 2 percent directly to end-users (Table 2.11).
Complete Systems
Origin of Shipments
Imports of solar thermal collectors totaled 3.9 million square feet in 2007 (Table 2.7).
Almost 90 percent of all imports were low-temperature collectors (3.5 million square
feet). These imports originated in seven foreign countries, and about 3.7 million square
feet of the solar thermal collectors were imported from Israel (Table 2.7 and Table 2.8).
In 2007, 72 percent (10.9 million square feet) of all solar thermal collectors were
manufactured in five states: California, New Jersey, Florida, Pennsylvania, and
Connecticut, with 62 percent (9.4 million square feet) of the total shipped from California
and New Jersey (Table 2.4 and Table 2.6).
Export shipments totaled 1.4 million square feet in 2007. More than 1.3 million square
feet, or 97 percent of total exports, were low-temperature solar thermal collectors (Table
2.9). The export market accounted for 9 percent of total shipments and was dominated
by sales to Canada (37 percent of exports), Mexico (20 percent), and Brazil (18 percent)
(Table 2.10).
In 2007, 13.8 million square feet of domestic solar thermal shipments went to all 50
States within the U.S., together with the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, Guam,
and Puerto Rico (Table 2.6). Over two-thirds were shipped to the top five destinations
(states): California, Florida, Arizona, Oregon, and Illinois. California and Florida
received nearly 54 percent of total shipments (Table 2.4 and Table 2.6). Notably, there
was a dramatic decrease in shipments to several states in 2007, including Alabama,
California, Florida, Nevada, New York, and North Carolina. This mainly was caused by
the sharp decrease in demand as reported by a number of companies.
1998 7,396
1999 8,046
2000 7,857
2001 10,349
2002 11,004
2003 10,926
2004 13,301
2005 14,680
2006 19,532
2007 13,777
2007 Shipments
Origin/Destination Thousand Square Percent of
Feet U.S.Total
Origin
Top Five States 10,902 72
California 5,114 34
New Jersey 4,313 28
Florida 1,125 7
Pennsylvania 225 1
Connecticut 125 1
Other Domestic 360 2
Imported 3,891 26
Destination
Top Five States 9,991 66
California 4,179 28
Florida 3,933 26
Arizona 768 5
Oregon 625 4
Illinois 486 3
Other Domestic 3,786 25
Exported 1,376 9
2006 Shipments
Origin/Destination Thousand Square Percent of
Feet U.S.Total
Origin
Top Five States 16,225 78
New Jersey 5,606 27
California 5,442 26
Nevada 3,845 19
Florida 1,041 5
Tennessee 290 1
Other Domestic 275 1
Imported 4,244 20
Destination
Top Five States 15,054 73
Florida 4,841 23
California 4,610 22
Nevada 4,215 20
Arizona 780 4
New York 607 3
Other Domestic 4,479 22
Exported 1,211 6
- = No data reported.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63A, "Annual Solar Thermal Collector Manufacturers Survey."
Asia
China 41,964 98,176 2.52
Israel 4,122,040 3,655,012 93.94
Total 4,164,004 3,753,188 96.46
Australia & Oceania
Australia 36,981 33,000 0.85
Total 36,981 33,000 0.85
Europe
Federal Republic of
31,689 84,339 2.17
Germany
Turkey 1,654 3,444 0.09
United Kingdom 9,633 5,664 0.15
Total 42,976 93,447 2.40
North America
Canada - 11,190 0.29
Total - 11,190 0.29
Africa
Morocco - 22,648 1.65
Nigeria - 400 0.03
South Africa - 42 *
Tunisia - 139 0.01
Total - 23,229 1.69
Asia
China - 3,000 0.22
Japan 5,000 2,000 0.15
Malaysia 2,715 - -
Saudi Arabia - 3,532 0.26
United Arab Emirates 11,220 - -
Total 18,935 8,532 0.62
Australia & Oceania
Australia 66,953 89,005 6.47
New Zealand - 14,906 1.08
Total 66,953 103,911 7.55
Central America
Antigua and Barbuda 1,900 1,188 0.09
Aruba 217 248 0.02
Bahamas 3,108 2,349 0.17
Barbados - 1,981 0.14
Bermuda 80 266 0.02
British Virgin Islands 912 - -
Cayman Islands 1,136 - -
Costa Rica 8,416 9,678 0.70
Dominican Republic 1,778 - -
Guatemala 11,144 12,064 0.88
Honduras - 1,723 0.13
Jamaica 620 1,528 0.11
Mexico 205,117 274,326 19.94
Netherlands Antilles 170 1,993 0.14
Nicaragua 40 - -
Panama 64 - -
Saint Lucia 140 - -
Trinidad and Tobago 434 5,236 0.38
Total 235,276 312,580 22.72
Europe
Belgium 21,577 - -
Czech Republic 12,000 13,200 0.96
Denmark 3,000 - -
Federal Republic of
75,000 288 0.02
Germany
France 148,541 38,944 2.83
Italy 15,891 15,509 1.13
Portugal - 9,400 0.68
Romania - 176 0.01
Russia - 1,080 0.08
Spain 64,000 - -
Sweden 24,894 53,334 3.88
United Kingdom 8,090 19,558 1.42
Total 372,993 151,489 11.01
North America
Canada 513,699 512,889 37.28
Total 513,699 512,889 37.28
South America
Argentina - 3,115 0.23
Bolivia 480 - -
2006 2007
Average Price Average Price
Type Quantity (Thousand Revenue (Thousand Quantity (Thousand Revenue (Thousand
(Dollars per Square (Dollars per Square
Square Feet) Dollars) Square Feet) Dollars)
Feet) Feet)
Low-Temperature
Liquid and Air 15,546 30,324 1.95 13,323 26,276 1.97
Medium/High Temperature 5,198 90,792 17.47 1,829 33,539 18.33
Medium
Air 6 W W 15 W W
Liquid
ICS/Thermosiphon 238 5,793 24.34 231 5,598 24.27
Flat Plate 1,043 16,613 15.93 1,304 21,915 16.80
Evacuated Tube 55 1,422 25.71 243 4,210 17.36
Concentrator 4 W W 5 W W
High
Parabolic Dish and Trough 3,852 W W 33 W W
Other - - - - - -
Market Sector
Residential 11,352 13 217 1,052 166 - - - 12,799 -
Commercial 633 2 9 207 76 5 s - 931 -
Industrial - - - 18 - - 27 - 46 -
Electric Power 1 - - - - - - - 1 -
Transportation - - - - - - - - - -
End Use
Pool Heating 11,917 - - 158 - - - - 12,076 -
Hot Water 4 - 225 951 213 - s - 1,393 -
Space Heating 63 15 - 99 12 - - - 189 -
Space Cooling - - - - 13 - - - 13 -
Combined Space and Water Heating - - - 68 5 - - - 73 -
Process Heating - - - - - - 27 - 27 -
Electricity Generation 1 - - - - 5 - - 6 -
Number of
New Product Type
Companies
Low-Temperature Collectors 9
Medium-Temperature Collectors 17
High-Temperature Collectors 10
Noncollector Components 7
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63A, "Annual Solar Thermal Collector Manufacturers
Survey."
Shipments Percent of
Company
Year (Thousand Total
Rank
Square Feet) Shipments
Person
Year
Years
1998 207
1999 288
2000 284
2001 256
2002 356
2003 287
2004 317
2005 353
2006 1,069
2007 686
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63A, "Annual Solar Thermal
Collector Manufacturers Survey."
90-100 27 36
50-89 7 9
10-49 4 8
Less than 10 6 7
U.S. Total 44 60
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63A, "Annual Solar Thermal Collector
Manufacturers Survey."
Overview
Government incentives, rising energy costs, and the growing concern over climate
change have fueled rapid growth in the photovoltaic (PV) industry in the United States.
Subsequent to the investment tax credit for solar installations that went into effect in
January 2006 as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the PV industry has experienced
two consecutive years of enormous growth in total shipments of PV cells and modules.
Shipments increased about 50 percent each year between 2005 and 2007. As a result, the
industry is more than 10 times the size it was in 1998 (Figure 3.1, Table 3.1, and Table
3.3). Simultaneously, the significant growth of the PV market caused a silicon shortage
within the PV industry. Nevertheless, supply shortages have led PV manufacturers to
find ways to use silicon more effectively and efficiently. It has stimulated the
development of thin-film technologies that do not rely on silicon and are less expensive
to manufacture than the crystalline silicon technologies.
550,000
500,000
450,000 Cell Module
400,000
Peak Kilowatts
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey."
Industry Status
The number of active PV manufacturers and/or importers that ship PV cells and modules
increased from 41 companies in 2006 to 46 companies in 2007. These new companies
increased overall PV production to meet the expected increase in demand internationally.
During 2007, PV cell and module shipments reached a record high of 517,684 peak
The companies reporting PV shipments in 2007 also reported being involved in one or
more of the following photovoltaic-related activities:
PV cells and modules can be made from different semiconductor materials, varying in
cost and performance. Shipments of PV cells and modules are divided into three main
categories by product type (Figure 3.2): (1) crystalline silicon, a type of photovoltaic
cell/module made from a wedge of single-crystal or polycrystalline silicon, based on
crystal-producing processes such as single-crystal, cast, and ribbon; (2) thin-film,
photovoltaic cell/module made from layers of semiconductor material, such as
amorphous silicon (a-Si), cadmium telluride (CdTe), or copper indium gallium selenide
(CIGS); and (3) concentrator, a type of photovoltaic cell/module including a reflective or
refractive device (such as lenses that gather and concentrate sunlight onto the
photovoltaic cell).
210,000
Single-Crystal
180,000 Cast & Ribbon
150,000 Thin-Film
Pear Kilowatts
Concentrator
120,000
90,000
60,000
30,000
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey."
Photovoltaic (PV) cell and module shipments reached 517,684 peak kilowatts in 2007, a
53 percent increase from the 2006 shipments of 337,268 peak kilowatts. Cell shipments
accounted for 23,535 peak kilowatts, while module shipments accounted for 494,148
peak kilowatts (Figure 3.1 and Table 3.3). Shipments of cells have generally declined
over the past decade, while module shipments have increased more than tenfold.
Despite the shift in focus to thin-film technologies, crystalline silicon cells and modules
continued to dominate the PV industry in 2007, accounting for 60 percent of the total
shipments (Table 3.5). However, this represents a considerable decline from its 76
percent market share in 2005. In particular, single-crystal silicon totaled 128,542 peak
kilowatts, an increase of more than 50 percent compared with corresponding 2006
shipments. Cast and ribbon silicon shipments total 181,788 peak kilowatts in 2007,
nearly a 23 percent increase from the corresponding 2006 shipments.
Figure 3.3 Crystalline Silicon Shipment and Thin-Film Shipment Market Shares,
1998-2007
100%
90%
80%
70%
Market Share
60%
Crystalline Silicon Thin-Film
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey."
Over the last few years, there has been increasing interest in concentrator photovoltaic
(CPV) technology. Although concentrator shipments only accounted for about 1 percent
of the total in 2007, the shipments of 4,835 peak kilowatts are noteworthy, representing
an increase of 144 percent when compared with corresponding 2006 shipments (Table
3.5).
Total revenue of photovoltaic cell and module shipments grew 49 percent from $1.16
billion in 2006 to $1.72 billion in 2007 (Table 3.6). Revenue includes charges for
cooperative advertising and warranties, but does not include excise taxes and the cost of
freight or transportation12.
The average price for modules (dollars per peak watt) decreased about 4 percent, from
$3.50 in 2006 to $3.37 in 2007. For cells, the average price increased more than 9
percent, from $2.03 in 2006 to $2.22 in 2007.
12
See the EIA glossary.
$5.00
Cell Module
$4.50
$4.00
Dollars per Paek Watt
$3.50
$3.00
$2.50
$2.00
$1.50
$1.00
$0.50
$0.00
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell
Manufacturers Survey."
Domestic Shipments
Rising energy costs during the past few years and the public perception of potentially
large energy savings combined with the availability of various incentives have increased
the demand for PV. During 2007, domestic shipments continued to surge rapidly,
totaling 280,475 peak kilowatts, nearly a 36 percent increase from 206,511 peak
kilowatts in 2006 (Table 3.2).
In 2007, domestic shipments to the commercial sector accounted for 140,434 peak
kilowatts or 50 percent of the domestic market. Of the domestic shipments to the
commercial sector, 81 percent were crystalline silicon, and about 19 percent were thin-
film PV. Less than 0.2 percent was concentrator PV (Table 3.7). The residential sector
was the second-largest domestic market in the United States in 2007, accounting for
68,417 peak kilowatts or about 24 percent of the domestic market share. This market
purchased 80 percent crystalline silicon and 20 percent thin-film PV. The electric power
sector, with 13 percent of domestic shipments, was the third-largest domestic sales
market, totaling 35,294 peak kilowatts. About 93 percent were crystalline silicon, 5
percent were thin-film PV, and 2 percent were concentrator PV. Shipments to the
industrial sector amounted to 32,702 peak kilowatts, or about 12 percent of the domestic
market share. Crystalline silicon accounted for 67 percent of the industrial shipments and
thin-film PV accounted for 33 percent.
During 2007, PV shipments to installers, the largest customer type, totaled 110,009 peak
kilowatts, nearly 40 percent of the domestic market share. Shipments to the second-
largest customer type, wholesale distributors, amounted to 109,015 peak kilowatts, or
nearly 39 percent of the domestic market share (Table 3.4).
Complete Systems
A complete PV system is defined as a power supply unit that satisfies all the power
requirements of an application. Such a system is made up of different components,
including one or more PV modules, a power conditioning unit to process the electricity
into the form needed by the application, wires, and other electrical connectors. Batteries
for back-up power supply are an option. Some large-scale PV systems use concentrators
to focus incident insolation onto small PV cells and tracking systems to track the sun.
These large-scale systems convert sunlight directly into electricity and produce the
greatest amounts of power during the afternoon, when electricity demand is high.
Origin of Shipments
Imports of PV cells and modules totaled 238,018 peak kilowatts or 46 percent of total
shipments in 2007 (Table 3.11). The predominant type of import shipment was
crystalline silicon cells and modules, accounting for 90 percent (214,457 peak kilowatts)
of total imports. Japan, China, and Germany accounted for 85 percent of total imports
(Table 3.12).
In 2007, a total of 279,666 peak kilowatts of PV cells and modules were manufactured in
the United States; manufacturers in Ohio, Michigan, California, and Maryland produced
85 percent of total (Table 3.9).
13
See the EIA glossary.
Exports of PV cells and modules totaled 237,209 peak kilowatts in 2007, an 81 percent
increase from the 2006 exports of 130,757 peak kilowatts (Table 3.13). The predominant
type of export shipment was thin-film cells and modules, accounting for about 63 percent
(149,977 peak kilowatts) of total exports. The export market accounted for 46 percent of
total shipments and was dominated by sales to Germany (more than 64 percent of
exports), Spain (about 13 percent), and Italy (about 4 percent) (Table 3.14).
In 2007, a total of 280,475 peak kilowatts of domestic PV cell and module shipments
went to all 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico (Table
3.10). About 86 percent of domestic PV cell and module shipments (241,712 peak
kilowatts) went to five States: California, Nevada, Colorado, New Jersey, and Arizona,
with 75 percent (209,031 peak kilowatts) of the total shipments sent to California and
Nevada.
1998 15,069
1999 21,201
2000 19,838
2001 36,310
2002 45,313
2003 48,664
2004 78,346
2005 134,465
2006 206,511
2007 280,475
Crystalline Silicon
Single-Crystal 71,901 85,627 128,542 32 25 25
Cast and Ribbon 101,065 147,892 181,788 45 44 35
Subtotal 172,965 233,518 310,330 76 69 60
Thin-Film 53,826 101,766 202,519 24 30 39
Concentrator 125 1,984 4,835 * 1 1
Other1 - - - - - -
2006 2007
Type Revenue (Thousand Average Price (Dollars per Peak Watt) Revenue (Thousand Average Price (Dollars per Peak Watt)
Dollars) Modules Cells Dollars) Modules Cells
Crystalline Silicon
Single-Crystal 339,859 4.09 2.09 478,355 3.74 3.06
Cast and Ribbon 529,176 3.66 2.39 645,964 3.62 2.65
Subtotal 869,035 3.82 2.28 1,124,319 3.67 2.74
Thin-Film W W W W W W
Concentrator W W W W W W
Other1 - - - - - -
Market Sector
Residential 54,793 13,624 - - 68,417 -
Commercial 113,780 26,404 250 - 140,434 -
Industrial 22,064 10,638 - - 32,702 -
Electric Power 32,682 1,876 737 - 35,294 -
Transportation 3,627 - - - 3,627 -
End Use
Electricity Generation
Grid Interactive 201,588 50,613 900 - 253,101 -
Remote 10,726 54 87 - 10,867 -
Communication 2,336 500 - - 2,836 -
Consumer Goods 29 560 - - 589 -
Transportation 4,018 - - - 4,018 -
Water Pumping 3,818 34 - - 3,852 -
Cells/Modules to OEM 4,022 780 - - 4,802 -
Health 410 - - - 410 -
2007 17 14 12 8 12 35 -
- = No data reported.
Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey."
Arizona - 6,000
California - 45,236
Delaware - 18,412
Iowa - 1,147
Maryland - 28,323
Massachusetts - 8,264
Michigan - 47,647
New Jersey - 1,578
New Mexico - 2,752
New York - 107
Ohio - 116,500
Pennsylvania - 3,700
Shipments from United States/Territories - 279,666
Imports - 238,018
Alabama - 25
Alaska - 40
Arizona - 8,198
Arkansas - 14
California - 180,272
Colorado - 14,178
Connecticut - 813
Delaware - 754
District of Columbia - 6
Florida - 6,342
Georgia - 138
Hawaii - 3,085
Idaho - 56
Illinois - 396
Indiana - 277
Iowa - 50
Kansas - 52
Kentucky - 12
Louisiana - 132
Maine - 116
Maryland - 1,068
Massachusetts - 2,904
Michigan - 140
Minnesota - 381
Mississippi - 2
Missouri - 221
Montana - 439
Nebraska - 41
Nevada - 28,759
New Hampshire - 517
New Jersey - 10,305
New Mexico - 1,529
New York - 4,536
North Carolina - 985
North Dakota - 23
Ohio - 229
Oklahoma - 264
Oregon - 1,640
Pennsylvania - 953
Puerto Rico - 10
Rhode Island - 765
South Carolina - 250
South Dakota - 34
Tennessee - 53
Texas - 6,048
Utah - 113
Vermont - 1,443
Virgin Islands of the U.S. - 1
Virginia - 174
Washington - 668
West Virginia - 52
Wisconsin - 828
Wyoming - 147
Shipments to United States/Territories - 280,475
Exported - 237,209
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey."
Cells
1999 150 4 - - 154
2000 3,779 3 24 - 3,805
2001 3,169 6 - - 3,175
2002 915 4 - - 919
2003 439 3 - - 442
2004 33,607 - - - 33,607
2005 46,538 - - - 46,538
2006 74,290 - - - 74,290
2007 64,757 - 95 - 64,852
Modules
1999 3,530 1,100 - - 4,630
2000 4,383 633 - - 5,016
2001 6,681 348 - - 7,029
2002 6,119 259 - - 6,378
2003 9,027 262 - - 9,289
2004 14,096 - - - 14,096
2005 33,081 11,337 25 - 44,443
2006 84,308 14,170 1,209 - 99,687
2007 149,699 23,466 - - 173,165
Totals
Asia
China 33,363 59,405 24.96
Hong Kong 3,759 3,429 1.44
India 4,850 4,976 2.09
Japan 102,465 102,791 43.19
Philippines 606 364 0.15
Taiwan 12,766 583 0.24
Total 157,810 171,547 72.07
Australia & Oceania
Australia 657 - -
Total 657 - -
Central America
Mexico 2,338 23,961 10.07
Total 2,338 23,961 10.07
Europe
Federal Republic of
7,295 41,265 17.34
Germany
France 2,000 - -
Spain 215 - -
Sweden 3,645 - -
United Kingdom 18 4 *
Total 13,173 41,268 17.34
North America
Canada - 1,241 0.52
Total - 1,241 0.52
Cells
1999 31,031 - 9 - 31,040
2000 32,019 - 86 - 32,105
2001 26,899 - 174 - 27,073
2002 33,952 - 267 - 34,219
2003 30,337 - 127 - 30,464
2004 36,492 - - - 36,492
2005 20,434 - - - 20,434
2006 12,960 838 400 - 14,198
2007 16,592 1,500 3,753 - 21,845
Modules
1999 23,587 958 - - 24,545
2000 35,440 837 - - 36,277
2001 29,660 4,622 - - 34,282
2002 29,987 2,572 - - 32,559
2003 25,190 5,039 - - 30,229
2004 52,938 13,341 - - 66,278
2005 39,992 32,000 25 - 72,017
2006 47,681 68,880 - - 116,561
2007 66,791 148,477 95 - 215,364
Totals
Africa
Angola 1 s *
Egypt 307 - -
Gambia - 1 *
Kenya 172 17 *
Namibia - 38 0.02
Nigeria 6 174 0.07
South Africa 385 619 0.26
Tanzania 6 42 0.02
Uganda - 27 0.01
Total 876 918 0.39
Asia
Afghanistan 83 147 0.06
Cambodia - 156 0.07
China 4,403 7,238 3.05
Hong Kong 2,116 5,427 2.29
India 1,946 2,795 1.18
Indonesia 13 - -
Israel 55 174 0.07
Japan - 1,032 0.44
Korea, South 4,021 3,444 1.45
Malaysia 3 4 *
North Korea 42 - -
Oman - 14 *
Saudi Arabia 1 11 *
Singapore 2,349 698 0.29
Taiwan 5 1,111 0.47
Thailand 45 - -
United Arab Emirates 12 18 *
Total 15,093 22,269 9.39
Australia & Oceania
Australia 1,562 2,757 1.16
French Polynesia 93 15 *
New Zealand 70 9 *
Total 1,725 2,781 1.17
Central America
Bahamas 1 - -
Bermuda 1 1 *
British Virgin Islands - 6 *
Costa Rica 347 - -
Dominican Republic 1 33 0.01
El Salvador 1 - -
Grenada 32 - -
Guadeloupe 31 - -
Guatemala 101 3 *
Haiti 24 20 *
Honduras 111 26 0.01
Jamaica - 43 0.02
Martinique - 1 *
Mexico 723 116 0.05
Nicaragua 50 30 0.01
Panama 85 4 *
Trinidad and Tobago 8 4 *
Total 1,515 288 0.12
Europe
Austria 328 118 0.05
Belgium 1 147 0.06
Bulgaria - 15 *
Denmark 3 - -
Federal Republic of
80,583 152,654 64.35
Germany
Finland 6 10 *
France 1,447 10,228 4.31
Iceland - 1 *
Ireland 28 - -
Italy 1,475 10,364 4.37
Luxembourg 324 - -
Netherlands 138 451 0.19
Norway 256 292 0.12
Portugal 6,605 647 0.27
Slovakia - 5 *
Spain 15,242 31,384 13.23
Sweden 2,501 1,333 0.56
Switzerland 23 109 0.05
United Kingdom 186 11 *
Total 109,144 207,768 87.59
North America
Canada 1,536 1,246 0.53
Total 1,536 1,246 0.53
South America
Argentina 43 90 0.04
Bolivia 89 89 0.04
Brazil 79 1,359 0.57
Chile 85 140 0.06
Colombia 226 52 0.02
Ecuador 1 58 0.02
Guyana 60 - -
Peru 240 141 0.06
Uruguay 45 - -
Venezuela 1 9 *
Total 869 1,939 0.82
Number of Number of
Year
Companies Person-Years
1998 21 1,988
1999 19 2,013
2000 21 1,913
2001 19 2,666
2002 19 2,696
2003 20 2,590
2004 19 2,916
2005 29 3,198
2006 41 4,028
2007 46 6,170
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic
Module/Cell Manufacturers Survey."
Number of
New Product Type
Companies
Crystalline Silicon
Single-Crystal Silicon Modules 11
Cast Silicon Modules 6
Ribbon Silicon Modules 2
Thin-Film
Amorphous Silicon Modules 3
Other (Thin Film) 3
Other (Flat Plate) 1
Concentrators 2
Nonmodule System Components 1
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell Manufacturers
Survey."
Number of Companies
Type of Activity
2006 2007
90-100 - 28
50-89 - 7
10-49 - 7
Less than 10 - 4
U.S. Total - 46
- = No data reported.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-63B, "Annual Photovoltaic Module/Cell
Manufacturers Survey."
Overview
For the past four years, the U.S. Geothermal Heat Pump (GHP) industry has seen double-
digit growth each year, fueled in part by the soaring energy prices for traditional fuels as
well as the desire for reliable and clean energy alternatives. In 2007, total geothermal
heat pump shipments surged 36 percent to 86,396 units (Table 4.1), while capacity
shipped rose 19 percent to 291,300 tons (Table 4.2). While 2007 capacity growth was
substantial, it was below growth in 2006, which was 53 percent. Total rated capacity of
geothermal heat pumps shipped in 2006 was 245,603 tons, compared to 160,402 tons in
2005 (Table 4.2 and Figure 4.1). Despite costing more initially than traditional heating
and cooling systems, the high efficiency and ongoing cost-saving potential of GHP has
resulted in GHP becoming the heating and cooling system of choice for many consumers.
300,000
280,000
Rated Capacity in Tons
260,000
240,000
220,000
200,000
180,000
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers Survey."
Industry Status
In 2007, there were about 17 known domestic manufacturers of geothermal heat pumps,
including brand-name manufacturers14 that shipped geothermal heat pumps manufactured
by others under contract.
14
Brand name manufacturer is defined as a name used to identify a product in the consumer marketplace,
which attributes the product to the owner of the name as the manufacturer.
Out of 86,369 GHP units shipped in 2007, a total of 8,112 were ARI-320 rated, 66,863
were ARI-325 or ARI-330 rated, and 809 were ARI-870 rated. ARI-rated shipments
increased to 75,784 units in 2007, while the number of other non-rated units shipped
more than doubled to 10,612 in 2007 (Table 4.1).
The manufacturers reporting GHP shipments in 2007 also reported being involved in one
or more of the following geothermal heat pump-related activities (Table 4.15):
Of the 17 manufacturers active in 2007, 6 are planning to introduce new ARI-320 rated
water-source heat pumps, 6 are planning new ARI-325 rated ground water-source heat
pumps, 8 are planning to introduce new ARI-330 rated ground source closed-loop heat
pumps, and 1 is expecting to introduce new ARI-870 rated direct geoexchange heat
pumps in 2008 (Table 4.13). These statistics indicate that increasing public demand for
alternative energy systems has created business opportunities for the geothermal heating
and cooling industry.
Direct use geothermal energy (e.g., low-temperature water from conventional geothermal
sources for crop drying) and energy consumed by GHP both increased in 2007. GHP
energy consumption increased 15 percent in 2007 to an estimated 32 trillion Btu, while
direct use inched upward from 9.1 to 9.4 trillion Btu (Table 4.17)17.
The total rated capacity of geothermal heat pumps shipped in 2007 was 291,300 tons,
approximately 19 percent more than the 2006 shipments of 245,603 tons (Table 4.2).
The average unit size shipped in 2007 was 3.37 tons, compared to an average unit size of
3.86 tons in 2006 (Table 4.1 and Table 4.2).
In 2007, water-source heat pump (ARI-320 rated) shipments totaled 15,667 tons, which is
almost 50 percent less than water-source heat pump shipments in 2006 (Figure 4.2 and
Table 4.2). The decrease occurred because one manufacturer classified its equipment
differently in 2007 than in 2006.
Shipments of ground water-source heat pumps and ground-source heat pumps (ARI-
325/330 rated) continued to dominate the GHP industry in 2007, accounting for 73
percent of the total shipments (Figure 4.2 and Table 4.2). The shipments of ARI-325 and
ARI-330 were 212,739 tons, a 37 percent increase from the corresponding 2006
shipments.
Shipments of direct geoexchange heat pump (ARI-870 Rated) totaled 3,412 tons in 2007
(Figure 4.2 and Table 4.2).
Despite a doubling of unit sales, capacity of non-ARI rated heat pump shipments in 2007
rose only slightly more than 1 percent (59,482 tons) over 2006 shipments (Figure 4.2 and
Table 4.2).
17
Data provided by Dr. John W. Lund, Oregon Institute of Technology, Geo Heat Center.
240,000
ARI-320
210,000
ARI-325/330
Rated Capacity in Tons
180,000 ARI-870
150,000 Other Non-ARI Rated
120,000
90,000
60,000
30,000
0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers Survey."
The total revenue for shipments of geothermal thermal heat pumps was approximately
$219 million in 2007 (Table 4.5). Revenue includes charges for cooperative advertising
and warranties, but does not include excise taxes and the cost of freight or transportation.
The average price (dollars per ton) for water-source heat pumps (ARI-320 rated) was
$735.60, ground water-source heat pumps and ground-source heat pumps (ARI-325/330
rated) was $781.08, direct geoexchange heat pumps (ARI-870 rated) was $1,002.36, and
other non-ARI rated heat pumps was $636.50 (Table 4.5).
Domestic Shipments
As prices for electricity, natural gas and heating oil continue to rise, geothermal heat
pumps for heating and cooling are becoming increasingly viable. During 2007, domestic
shipments continued to surge rapidly, with rated capacity totaling 238,870 tons, an 11
percent increase from 215,166 tons in 2006 (Table 4.6).
During 2007, GHP shipments to domestic wholesale distributors, the largest customer
category, totaled 130,275 tons or 55 percent of the domestic market share. Shipments to
the second-largest customer category, installers, amounted to 102,241 tons, or 43 percent
of the domestic market share (Table 4.10).
In 2007, domestic shipments to the residential sector accounted for 110,115 tons or 46
percent of the domestic market. Of the domestic shipments to the residential sector, 2
percent were ARI-320 rated, 89 percent were ARI-325/330 rated, 3 percent were ARI-
Complete Systems
• Geothermal earth connection subsystem: Using the earth as the heat source and
heat sink, this subsystem consists of a series of pipes which are commonly called
a “loop.” They carry a fluid used to connect the geothermal system's heat pump to
the earth near the building to be conditioned.
• Geothermal heat pump subsystem: An electric heat pump that exchanges heat
between the fluid and the air that conditions the building.
Of the manufacturers reporting 2007 shipments, the majority of these manufacturers sell
only geothermal heat pump subsystems (geothermal heat pump units), and only two
manufacturers reported selling complete systems. These systems accounted for 623 tons,
or 0.2 percent of total GHP shipped in 2007 (Table 4.12).
Origin of Shipments
During the year 2007, there were no GHP import shipments reported. All GHP units (a
total of 291,300 tons) were manufactured in the United States. The top five
manufacturing states were: Florida, Indiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, and Texas, with 54
percent (157,958 tons) of the total shipped from Indiana and Oklahoma (Table 4.8).
Exports of GHP shipments totaled 52,430 tons in 2007. The export market accounted for
18 percent of total shipments and was dominated by sales to Canada, with 61 percent
(32,104 tons) of total exports (Table 4.7).
In 2007, a total of 238,870 tons of domestic GHP shipments went to all 50 States and the
District of Columbia (Table 4.6). About 52 percent of domestic GHP shipments (124,152
tons) went to ten States: Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, New York, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, with 15 percent (36,470 tons) of the total
shipments sent to Illinois and New York.
2006 2007
Quantity (Rated Revenue Average Price Quantity (Rated Revenue Average Price
Model Type
Capacity in (Thousand (Dollars per Capacity in (Thousand (Dollars per
Tons) Dollars) Ton) Tons) Dollars) Ton)
- = No data reported.
Note: "Export" in Table 4.6 and "Exporter" in Table 4.10 are different. "Export" refers to shipments outside of the country, while
"Exporter" is the type of customer.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers Survey."
Asia
China - 110 0.21
India - 15 0.03
Korea, South - 2,180 4.16
Palestinian Authority - 8 0.02
Total - 2,313 4.41
Australia & Oceania
Australia - 5,186 9.89
Total - 5,186 9.89
Central America
Mexico - 342 0.65
Total - 342 0.65
Europe
Czech Republic - 181 0.35
Estonia - 20 0.04
Italy - 1,863 3.55
Latvia - 69 0.13
Lithuania - 152 0.29
Poland - 970 1.85
Romania - 426 0.81
Russia - 905 1.73
Spain - 55 0.10
Turkey - 75 0.14
United Kingdom - 7,769 14.82
Total - 12,485 23.81
North America
Canada - 32,104 61.23
Total - 32,104 61.23
Arkansas - 1,867
Florida - 44,328
Indiana - 99,166
Michigan - 30,179
Minnesota - 8,524
Ohio - 2,401
Oklahoma - 58,792
Pennsylvania - 943
Tennessee - 581
Texas - 44,519
Shipments from United States/Territories - 291,300
Imported - -
U.S. Total - - -
- = No data reported.
Note: Totals may not equal sum of components due to independent rounding.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers
Survey."
Exporter 206 91
Wholesale Distributor 130,342 130,275
Retail Distributor 1,566 5,629
Installer 82,721 102,241
End-User 331 634
Complete Systems
Shipped - 157
Rated Capacity (Tons) - 623
Percent of Total Shipments - s
Number of Companies - 2
Revenue of Systems (Thousand Dollars) - W
s = Value is less than 0.5 of the table metric, but value is included in any associated total.
W = Data withheld to avoid disclosure of proprietary company data.
- = No data reported.
Note: Complete geothermal heating/cooling system is defined as geothermal heat pump unit with all the necessary functional
components, except for installation materials. These include geothermal heat pump, air handler, heat exchanger, and system
kits.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat Pump Manufacturers Survey."
Number of
New Product Type
Companies
Person
Year
Years
1998 -
1999 -
2000 -
2002 -
2003 -
2004 -
2005 -
2006 -
2007 1,219
- = No data reported.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat
Pump Manufacturers Survey."
90-100 - 8
50-89 - 1
10-49 - 4
Less than 10 - 4
U.S. Total - 17
- = No data reported.
Source: Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-902, "Annual Geothermal Heat Pump
Manufacturers Survey."
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects information about green pricing
programs on the Form EIA-861, “Annual Electric Power Industry Report,” which is a
survey of electric industry participants.18 All respondents, except independent power
producers and qualifying facilities, are asked to report their number of customers in green
pricing programs by state and customer class.
Net metering programs usually permit customers - typically residential - operating very
small generators for some of their needs to purchase extra electricity when needed and to
sell back any excess power to the utility if available. Provisions vary by state and utility
and often apply to solar or wind energy. In addition, pricing schemes vary by individual
utility and customer circumstance. This system facilitates the ease of operating
intermittent generators, such as those using solar and wind energy, and improves their
economics. The EIA collects information on net metering on the Form EIA-861 in much
the same manner as it does green pricing.
After a dismal year in 2006 when the number of green pricing customers fell by almost
300,000, the market for green pricing customers rebounded across the nation in 2007
(Table 5.1 and Figure 5.1). The number of customers in green pricing programs
increased by 192,795 to 835,651 in 2007. Texas led this increase with 41,384 new
customers, which brought its total to 142,334 or 17 percent of the market. Oregon and
Maryland followed with 19,862 and 18,906 new customers respectively. By year’s end,
537 electric industry participants in 46 states and the District of Columbia reported
having green pricing customers. Ninety-three percent of the customers were residential.
The two states with the most customers, Texas and Oregon, accounted for 29 percent of
green pricing customers nationwide. Of all the states with a sizeable number of green
pricing customers, only New York and North Dakota experienced any significant decline
in number of customers.
18
“Electric industry participants” include electric utilities, wholesale power marketers, energy service
providers, and electric power producers.
Although the number of customers in net metering programs remains a tiny share of total
customers, growth has been rapid (Figure 5.2). The total number of customers in net
metering programs increased by 45 percent to 48,820 in 2007 (Table 5.2). California,
already the largest source of net metering customers with 72 percent of the national total,
had the largest increase of 8,779 customers, while New Jersey increased by 1,223
customers. California and New Jersey’s success in 2007 was due in some measure to
their support of solar energy development, which included the promotion of favorable
rebate programs and other incentives.
In 2007, 288 electric industry participants in 47 states and the District of Columbia
reported having green pricing customers. Ninety-two percent of the customers were
residential.
Participating Customers
Electric Industry 2007 2006
State
Participants 20071 Non-
Residential Total Total
Residential
Participating Customers
Electric Industry
State 2007 2006
Participants 20071
Residential Non-Residential Total Total
Alabama - - - - -
Alaska 1 1 - 1 -
Arizona 8 1,092 54 1,146 188
Arkansas 7 19 - 19 4
California 21 32,509 2,401 34,910 26,131
Colorado 18 255 24 279 138
Connecticut 2 336 28 364 181
Delaware 1 117 24 141 50
District of Columbia 2 11 1 12 2
Florida 8 160 25 185 48
Georgia 3 20 - 20 1
Hawaii 4 355 59 414 207
Idaho 4 51 9 60 34
Illinois 4 5 4 9 11
Indiana 4 26 16 42 20
Iowa 10 20 9 29 17
Kansas 3 10 - 10 19
Kentucky 5 9 3 12 5
Louisiana 1 9 1 10 -
Maine 1 5 5 10 3
Maryland 6 97 2 99 13
Massachusetts 6 820 160 980 558
Michigan 7 14 1 15 13
Minnesota 27 325 24 349 252
Mississippi - - - - -
Missouri 6 10 - 10 6
Montana 3 303 106 409 46
Nebraska 1 - 1 1 -
Nevada 3 311 33 344 236
New Hampshire 4 110 34 144 97
New Jersey 5 2,863 352 3,215 1,992
New Mexico 10 241 16 257 23
New York 4 1,807 8 1,815 1,143
North Carolina 5 6 14 20 -
North Dakota 3 4 - 4 2
Ohio 10 106 36 142 52
Oklahoma 1 10 - 10 31
Oregon 13 637 77 714 540
Pennsylvania 7 221 48 269 174
Rhode Island 2 95 11 106 102
South Carolina 1 1 3 4 -
South Dakota 1 1 1 2 -
Tennessee - - - - -
Texas 11 562 37 599 412
Utah 5 134 9 143 111
Vermont 6 302 42 344 232
Virginia 12 108 5 113 60
Washington 20 451 183 634 158
West Virginia 4 8 - 8 1
Wisconsin 14 278 65 343 279
Wyoming 8 51 3 54 27