You are on page 1of 27

Michael William Flaherty

(808) 895-1699
Sent via Certified Mail # 7015 0640 0001 9494 9874

November 28, 2016

Mr. Barrack H. Obama, President


The White House
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193 (ULTIMATE)
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Re: United States of America v. Michael William Flaherty, et al.


Case No. 1:08-cv-000493 (D.H.)
CDCS Claim No. 2012A00665

Request for Settlement pursuant to


26 CFR 301.7426-2, 26 U.S. Code 7433,
26 U.S. Code 7434, 26 U.S. Code 7422
and 18 U.S. Code 1861.
Dear Mr. Barrack H. Obama,

FAILURE TO RESPOND MAY RESULT IN ESTOPPEL ON ALL ISSUES RAISED HEREIN.

Slavery, properly so called, is the establishment of a right which gives to


one man such a power over another as renders him absolute master of his life
and fortune. Montesquieu

Justice Black reflected his understanding Montesquieus political philosophy


in summarizing the Rule of Law in American Governance and clearly
differentiated it from various forms of statism:
"The essence of our free Government is leave to live by no man's leave,
underneath the law to be governed by those impersonal forces which we
call law. Our Government is fashioned to fulfill this concept so far as
humanly possible. The Executive, except for recommendation and veto, has
no legislative power." Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579,
655, Supreme Court (1952).

Alexander Hamilton argued:

The origin of all civil government, justly established, must be a


voluntary compact, between the rulers and the ruled; and must be liable
to such limitations, as are necessary for the security of the absolute
rights of the latter; for what original title can any man or set of men
have, to govern others, except their own consent? To usurp dominion over
a people, in their own despite, or to grasp at a more extensive power
than they are willing to entrust, is to violate that law of nature, which
gives every man a right to his personal liberty; and can, therefore,
confer no obligation to obedience. See: The Farmer Refuted (1775).

The political philosopher Alexander Solzhenitsyn opined You can maintain


power over people as long as you give them something. Rob a man of
everything, and that man will no longer be in your power. Complete Works.

P.O. Box 1281 w Kapaau, HI 96755


micflah@yahoo.com
Dissenting from the majority, Justice Louis D. Brandeis said:

Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials


shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the
citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be
imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is
the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the
whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government
becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to
become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the
administration of the [civil] law the end justifies the means -- to
declare that the government may commit crimes in order to [steal the tiny
portion of property] of a private [citizen] -- would bring terrible
retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should
resolutely set its face. See: Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438
(1928).

My concerns regarding the latest iteration of temporary government are the


plethora of corporate offices representing State and Federal government
domiciled in Washington DC. See: Section 1, ORDINANCE OF 1787: THE NORTHWEST
TERRITORIAL GOVERNMENT 01/03/2007.

I have attempted to purchase information that would provide me with details on


their corporate charters - I wished to compare their charters with the State
and Federal Constitutions they allegedly represent.

This information would help me clarify if the United States is still a


Republic or if, under the surface of civility, Americans ACTUALLY live in a
soft Fascist Economic System.

My bottom line question:

Do I and my children live in a soft-fascist regime that was organized


originally under the usurper Abraham Lincoln pursuant to General Orders 100?

I will more fully elaborate on the Historical record and the corporations that
concern me below.

I know I need your help - not your antagonism.

Please consider my efforts in this letter as conciliatory.

In a Republic, you and I are equals in the application of civil rights (Rule
of Law).

In Our Republic (IF it is), you are the most powerful man but you are still MY
(and every other Americans) Public Servant.

My intent here is not to offend or flatter you, I simply wish these issues
finally resolved.

As President and Chief Executive Officer of these corporations (particularly


the IRS), you have the power to make your employees perform their duties and
are ultimately responsible when they dont.

When they dont they are asked to retire or resign.

Mr. Obama, you became personally responsible for the fraud Ms. Butler
prosecuted when you allowed her to claim Executive Privilege to avoid

Page 2
producing valid assessments - because she didnt have any.

1.) the UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT;


2.) the Commissioner of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE;
3.) the UNITED STATES TREASURY;

ALLEGEDLY tried in the The District Court for the District of Hawaii - a
territorial (administrative tax court: pursuant to the authority of the
President) court that has limited jurisdiction not judicial power.

A COMPLETE ARTIFICE because all of the alleged separate agencies and the Court
IT was Tried in are subsidiary corporations of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Simply put: the lawsuit filed against me, once we strip away the corporate
facade and the artifice of your delegates, is ONLY you against me in a boxing
ring AND YOU OWN THE JUDGES!

I didnt pick the fight, your delegates did.

I defended myself, and each contender failed (retired or left service)


while I worked to find their Champion.

Mr. Obama, you are like the heavyweight champion of the world and your
delegates picked a fight with a street kid.

NO ONE would see that as a fair fight.

Especially it was learned the champion already bought and paid for the
outcome.

The street kid would have to fight or lose street cred resulting in him
having no value in the community.

Your delegates had martial arts training - they were attorneys - and black
belts from their experience and they STILL COULD NOT FIGHT ON EVEN GROUND!

OF COURSE THEY WON IN THE COURT YOU OWN AND CONTROL!

From the ghettos to nations, the same Law of Nations 1 applies: people form
gangs for their OWN benefit.

Governments are instituted among men to CONTROL THE GANGS, following


Montesquieus political philosophy.

When GANGS take over governments - NO ONE IS SAFE!

Not the people - not the world at large.

Of course I didnt know ANY OF THIS when your delegates started this fight
with me.

It was eight years ago this month that you were elected President of the
United States and assumed the leadership of these organizations in January,
2009.

I suspect that you really only became aware of the Complaint in Hawaii
District Court after I filed my Complaint seeking the production of the
alleged assessments for 1999, 2000 and 2001.

I suspect that is why Ms. Butler retired and Ms. Keneally left government
Page 3
service after they received my Requests(not really government - see below
regarding the fraudulent State governments that appear to operate from
Washington DC).

I will do my part in resolving this controversy: I will file the Information


Returns (Form(s) 1040)at issue: 1999 (18 pgs), 2000 (14 pgs), 2001 (2 pgs) and
2011 (2 pgs).

I am attaching these Information Returns to this letter and appointing you my


fiduciary to correct the issues with your delegates.

You may re-delegate your authority to a competent person from TIGTA to discuss
a financial settlement with me if you wish.

As a DIRECT RESULT of your delegates to FAILURE TO RESPOND to my questions


about the tax code, I am APPOINTING YOU MY FIDUCIARY, my TRUSTEE as ONE of
we the people (see below for more information) to advise me that FORM 2555
should be attached to my FORM 1040 to receive the MAXIMUM EXEMPTION provided
by Congress to American State Citizens.

Once that Exemption is applied to the alleged income - as your delegates


SHOULD HAVE DONE WITHOUT STEALING MY HOME - I OWE NO TAXES FOR THE YEARS IN
THE CONTROVERSY.

Associate Chief Counsel, Deborah Butler, gave advice that resulted in the
Foreclosure of my home.

She could have saved me a lot of effort, and your administration millions of
dollars in litigation costs and damages, by advising her delegates properly.

I simply wish that you do your part:

1.) Direct your delegate at the IRS to correct their records concerning
my name, Michael William Flaherty 1;

1
Since your delegates received the supporting documentation from my previously
un-filed Information Returns (Form 1040), and since my investigation into the FACTS in
this matter, it appears that you have only blank un-signed Information Returns (Form
1040).

It appears that I may replace them with completed and signed Information Returns (Form
1040) WITH Form 2555 Foreign Earned Income to eliminate the alleged tax liabilities.

THEREFORE, pursuant to 26 C.F.R. 1.9117/Treas. Reg. 1.9117 (D)(1) I am electing


to take the FOREIGN EARNED INCOME Exclusion for the Tax Years 1999, 2000, 2001 and
2011".

I, Michael William Flaherty, tender to you, Barrack H. Obama, President(s) of the


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND HER SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS, the Information Return(s)
(Form 1040) for the years in controversy, with the alleged income reduced by the
Foreign Earned Income that results in zero amounts in Gross Income and zero amounts
due as to any tax liability - JUST LIKE THEY WERE BEFORE ALL THIS LITIGATION!

I have redacted my childrens Social Security Numbers (that you already have on file).

Your delegates in UNITED STATES MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR CONFIRMATION
OF SALE claimed (in footnote 3) that Pursuant to the Order Granting Plaintiffs
Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 64); Order Denying Defendants Motion for
Reconsideration or Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 79) (at page 12), Defendant Michael
William Flaherty owes $139,795.89, calculated through August 3, 2010, plus interest
Page 4
2.) Agree to remuneration for my help in revising IRS procedures due to
identifying fraud and abuse and for the damages caused by your delegates
to me and my family;
3.) Award me a Private Attorney General Commission.

Due to health reasons, I will be unable to serve any longer in that position,
so I would like to retire, travel, recuperate and write childrens stories.

I am requesting a No-fee Official Department of Treasury agency issued


Passport that indicates my Appointment as a Private Attorney General because
standard US Passports are , either in book or card format, are only issued to
U.S. citizens or non-citizen U.S. nationals and I am neither.

I am ONE OF the free inhabitants of each of these States. . . [and] shall be


entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several
States pursuant to Article IV, ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION (1777).

Since Form DS-11 is only required for U.S. citizens or non-citizen U.S.
nationals, I have included my NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING: In leu of Immigration
Form I-9 to declare political status; In leu of Withholding agreement Form W-4
to declare exempt status which is my full Declaration based on my knowledge
and beliefs today.

I have attached an Original and a copy of my State of California Birth


Certificate as evidence that I a Citizen of a State.

I am attaching a photocopy of my Hawaii State Identification as evidence of


my residence in the Kingdom of Hawai`i (Offices Unoccupied).

I have included a Passport photograph.

Finally, I have included my expired Passport for destruction.

according to law, in federal income taxes for the 1999, 2000, and 2001 tax years.

Your delegates sold my half a million dollar home at the distressed sale price of
$120,000.00.

Your delegates determined how that money was appropriated and decided that $69,217.25
would go to the participants in the fraud: BANK OF HAWAII who FAILED to prove they had
an interest in the real estate by producing the ACTUAL NOTE creating the money for
the loan; and Barbara Franklin, Esq., the Commissioner for the sale.

The remaining amount would be split between my-now ex-wife and my alleged tax
liabilities.

Accordingly, your delegates have allegedly applied $25,391.38 towards those


liabilities.

The alleged remaining balance would be $114,404.51.

Recent Demands for Payment from the IRS total $114,328.24.

I DEMAND a Refund for tax years 1999, 2000 and 2001 of at least $25,391.38 to be
issued to me within ten days of receipt of this letter.

For tax year 2011 I expect a refund of S11,826.99.

Mr. Obama, will I be able to buy my children presents THIS holiday?


Page 5
I wish you will have one of your delegates expedite this application as well,
and shepherd it alongside my IRS Claims resolution 2.

Given the seriousness of these allegations, I expect ten days should be


sufficient for qualified IRS officials to correct my IDRS Records and refund
me the amounts unlawfully seized, and the refund of taxes previously paid.

The State and Treasury Departments may have an additional thirty days to
process my Passport Request.

Energy in the Executive is a leading character in the definition of good


government. It is essential to the protection of the community against foreign
attacks; it is not less essential to the steady administration of the laws; to
the protection of property against those irregular and high-handed combinations
which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of justice; to the security of
liberty against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, of faction, and of
anarchy. See: Alexander Hamilton, FEDERALIST No. 70, Tuesday, March 18, 1788.

It was six years ago this Season that my family could enjoy our last holiday
together in our home in Hawai`i.

We were forcibly removed from our home in January, the following month.

I would be very grateful if you choose to put some executive energy to work on
my behalf to resolve these issues.

In seeking evidence to help me resolve this case, I attempted to purchase


certain corporate records because I wanted to read their Corporate Charters
and learn about their shareholders.

The only source that appears to have information about those records is Dun
and Bradstreet.

One can find some information about these corporations from other internet
sites.

When one attempts to purchase the records, that one is redirected to Dun and
Bradstreet.

For example, here is data that is available for free on one site about a
corporation entitled THE WHITE HOUSE:
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20001 - View Map
Phone: (202) 666-7777

hector G updated this company profile

Products & Services


tax services
Barack Obama
President

Additional Contact Information


Primary Phone | (Skype) (202) 666-7777

2
According to the DS-11 Application the USE OF (MY) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
... will be provided to U.S. Department of Treasury, used in connection with debt
collection and checked against lists of persons ineligible or potentially ineligible
to receive a U.S. passport, among other authorized uses.

Page 6
About White House

Home of the President of the United States and the Executive Office of the
President.
Home of the President of the United States and the Executive Office of the
President.
Business Categories
Federal Government-Executive Offices in Washington, DC
Business Information
Location Type NA
Year Established 1776
Employees 2 to 4

We both know that Washington DC did not exist in 1776.

Washington DC was created by the ceding of State Territory to create the


Temporary Central Government envisioned by the Ordinance for the Northwest
Territories and the U.S. Constitution after 1787.

The area was a swamp that was drained to build the Capital.

We both know that the White House did not exist in 1776.

There was no Executive Office created in the Articles of Confederation.

We also both know that THE WHITE HOUSE has more employees than 2 to 4".

The first central government of the united States did not even exist in 1776.

The first government of the united States began with The Articles of
Confederation on November 15, 1777.

This Constitution has NO LEGAL PROVISION FOR SLAVERY, unlike the next
Constitution a mere ten years later.

It appears to me that this corporation is a container (like the


placeholders in IDRS Records - until signed Information Returns [Form 1040]
are available) for the de jure government founded on the Declaration of
Independence and The Articles of Confederation.

This Government STILL EXISTS!

Only 2 to 4" offices are OCCUPIED!

Do you occupy one of those offices as President of the Committee of States?


See: Art. IX, The Articles of Confederation , November 15, 1777.

Who occupies the other three offices representing the de jure States that
determine tax policy?

Republicanism and slavery ARE NOT compatible.

Your delegates construction of statutes is one that would ATTEMPT to IMPOSE a


(rump) statutory citizenship on Americans to pay a debt they did not
create and would reduce Americans into slaves.

Therefore the United States would have a very dubious claim of being a
Republic.

The license provided by the U.S. Constitution to own other human beings in
the second iteration of the US Government was used to cause the Civil War.
Page 7
This flaw has been exploited by the powerful in the United States Governments
third (or fourth or fifth (or more) depending how the data in the Historical
Record is rationalized) to propagandize American children in public schools
directed by delegates of the President of the United States, to convince
Americans they are US Citizens by birth.

The importation of African Nationals and chaining them into slavery was nearly
non-existent and dying out in the colonies prior to the Revolutionary War.

It began to steadily increase in the internecine period and SKYROCKETED AFTER


the U.S. Constitution was ratified by the willing and the duped.

The Historical Record indicates that one of the same groups who were
responsible for inciting the Revolution in 1776 - the group most affected by
the tax policies of England - were eventually called the Essex Junto from
Essex county, Massachusetts.

They were also the leading Federalists eleven years later.

These people were closely connected to each other by ties of business or


familial relationship and were mostly interested in creating a worldwide
commercial empire - with them (or their delegates) in charge of it.

It was of commercial interest to dramatically increase the number of African


slaves in the southern States.

As the people of the south became significantly outnumbered by the African


Americans they became much more afraid of their slaves.

The only way I know of to maintain control over a captive people is to


maintain some level of fear among the populace.

Indoctrinated into a belief system regarding race superiority with the law to
support it, caused some ignorant people to behave very badly towards their
brothers from a different mothers (mitochondrial DNA PROVES ALL MODERN
HUMANS DESCEND FROM ONE MOTHER).

This construction of statutes was likely a leading cause of the Civil War that
was led by the commercial interests - powerful people running the propaganda
operations of civil society.

Which leads us to considering: What IS the purpose of government?

According to the liberal political philosopher Montesquieu, the purpose or


nature of government in general was to free men from the domination of other
men.

Following Hobbes, Montesquieu believed that once men were joined together in
society, a state of war is the permanent state of mans relations to man
insofar as civil society, or the state does not intervene to impose peace.

According to data collated by University of Hawaii Professor R.J. Rummel,


nearly a billion people were killed by THEIR OWN GOVERNMENTS in the twentieth
century.

These governments often provide cover for powerful groups of individuals


who manipulate and control economics, media, education and international war
for their own benefit.

Page 8
I can go on for hours discussing what my research has uncovered but instead I
will go back to the purpose of this letter: correcting the records the IRS has
against my name and negotiating a settlement for the damages caused by their
actions.

There are many more corporate listings that I attempted to purchase from Dun
and Bradstreet, going as far as calling the executive offices and requesting
to speak with the legal department.

In response, a Vice President of Customer Service called me and assured me I


could purchase the documents I wished.

The Vice-president of Customer Service attempted to help me at first; I sent


her screen shots of the order process via email.

Perhaps as a result of seeing which records I sought, and then discussing it


with her superiors, she refused to respond to email and telephone calls
regarding the purchase of these corporate records.

Here is what was publically available on a few of the corporations whose


records I attempted to purchase:

1.) The White House Office


White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414
Web: www.whitehouse.gov
The White House Office

A privately held company in Washington, DC.


Denis Mcdonough appears to have set up this profile.

Business Information
Location Type Headquarters
Year Established 1987
Employees 83
SIC Code 9111, Executive Offices
NAICS Code 921110, Executive Offices
Business Categories

Presidents' Office in Washington, DC


Presidents' office
Executive Office

2.) Executive Offices in Washington


There are 34 companies under Executive Offices in Washington

Executive Office Of The President


1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
(202) 456-1414

3.) Executive Office Of The President


1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500 - View Map
Phone: (202) 456-1414

We The People updated this company profile (owner)


Barrack H President

Business Categories
Executive Offices in Washington, DC

Business Information
Location Type Branch

Page 9
Year Established 1776
Annual Revenue Estimate Over $1 billion
Employees Over 10,000

Additional Contact Information


Primary Phone | (Skype) (202) 456-1414
Fax | (202) 456-2883

Wait.

Let me read that again:

We The People updated this company profile (owner)


Annual Revenue Estimate Over $1 billion
Employees Over 10,000

Yeah.... that one sounds like your government!

I have never received any evidence that has ever suggested I OWNED shares in
the Executive Office of the President.

That is how corporations work: shares, shareholders and ownership with Bonds,
collateralized by property, to finance operations.

What property does the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT own that might be worth
fifteen TRILLION dollars if it is not the future earnings of US citizens?

Is that not SLAVERY to a FICTION?

Since we the people own shares and I have no evidence of such ownership then
clearly I am NOT one of we the people who own shares in this corporation.

Or, if I am:

I DEMAND YOU DO YOUR DUTY!

This is nothing extraordinary - just YOUR DUTY!

I have never naturalized as a US citizen. See: United States v. Wong Kim


Ark, 169 US 649, Supreme Court (1898).

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 15 states:

(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.


(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor
denied the right to change his nationality.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Articles 1-30 were adopted by the
United States on 10 th day of December 1948.

The following bullet points summarizes the citizenship issue:

the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (Pub.L. 82414, 66 Stat.


163, enacted June 27, 1952), also known as the McCarranWalter Act,
restricted immigration into the U.S. and is codified under Title 8 of
the United States Code;

the Act governs primarily immigration to and citizenship in the United


States. It has been in effect since December 24, 1952;

before this Act, a variety of statutes governed immigration law but were
Page 10
not organized within one body of text;

this Act states:

TITLE I-GENERAL, DEFINITIONS


SECTION 101. (a) As used in this Act-
(3) The term "alien" means any person not a citizen or national of the
United States .
(21) The term "national" means a person owing permanent allegiance to a
state .
(22) The term "national of the United States" means (A) a citizen of the
United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United
States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.
(23) The term "naturalization" means the conferring of nationality of a
state upon a person after birth, by any means whatsoever.

TITLE III-NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION


CHAPTER 1-NATIONALITY AT BIRTH AND BY COLLECTIVE NATURALIZATION
NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH
SEC. 301 . (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the
United States at birth :
(1) a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof;

this Act clearly indicates that unless one is born within the
territories under the jurisdiction of the United States, that one is a
State National and alien to the United States ;

this is consistent with the comprehensive explanation of citizenship in


Mr. Justice Greys opinion in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649,
Supreme Court (1898);

this Supreme Court opinion clearly indicates that unless one is born
within the territories under the jurisdiction of Congress that one MUST
follow Immigration protocols to become a U.S. citizen ;

this construction of the statutes is consistent with various court


citations restated herein:

It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the


United States** and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from
each other and which depend upon different characteristics or
circumstances in the individual. See: Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36
(1873)(emphasis added);

The first clause of the fourteenth amendment made negroes


citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the State in which
they reside, and thereby created two classes of citizens, one of the
United States** and the other of the state. See: Cory et al. v. Carter,
48 Ind. 327 (1874) headnote 8, (emphasis added);

We have in our political system a Government of the United


States** and a government of each of the several States. Each one of
these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of
its own .... See: U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, (1875) (emphasis
added);

One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United
States. Thomasson v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327
(17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16
Wis. 443. See: McDonel v. State, 90 Ind. 320, 323, (1883) (emphasis
added);

Page 11
A person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a
citizen of the particular state in which he resides. But a person may be
a citizen of a particular state and not a citizen of the United
States**. To hold otherwise would be to deny to the state the highest
exercise of its sovereignty, -- the right to declare who are its
citizens. See: State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380, 6 S. 602 (1889)
(emphasis added);

There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of
citizens, one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of
citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case
of a resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually
exist in the same person. See: Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala.
155, 48 S. 788, 791 (1909), (emphasis added);

There is a distinction between citizenship of the United States** and


citizenship of a particular state, and a person may be the former
without being the latter. See: Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823, (1949)
headnote 5, (emphasis added);

that the Privileges and Immunities Clause guaranteed the right of a citizen to
"become a citizen of any State of the Union." It did not permit the states (or
Washington D. C., a municipal corporation) to "select their citizens." See:
Saenz v. Doe, 526 U.S. 489, 119 S.Ct. 1518, 143 L.Ed.2d 689 (1999).

You may NOT IMPOSE US citizenship on me and make me liable to pay a debt
that your shareholders use to wage war on other Americans and around the world
to fund their lavish lifestyles and retirements.

In Corporations, the Board of Directors dictate corporate policy.

The ONLY goal of corporations is PROFIT.

Ever since the un-Constitutional so-called Fourteenth Amendment became


legal, corporations are persons with civil rights.

The civil rights of the corporations you lead does not include fraud among
many other crimes committed by your delegates. (See the file for a more
comprehensive list of violation).

The Congressional Record of 1967, pages 15641-15646, contains a detailed


explanation of the Rump Congress that unlawfully passed the 14 th Amendment
to the Constitution.

Comparing the behavior of corporations to the DSM V, one finds that if a


corporation3 is a person, then one only has to look at what destruction
corporations have and are doing to the environment to realize most of them are
sociopaths4.

3
See: The Corporation, (2003), Directors: Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott.
4
Antisocial Personality Disorder DSM-5 301.7 (F60.2)

According to the DSM-5, there are four diagnostic criterion, of which Criterion A has
seven sub-features.
A. Disregard for and violation of others rights since age 15, as indicated
by one of the seven sub features:
1. Failure to obey laws and norms by engaging in behavior which
results in criminal arrest, or would warrant criminal arrest
2. Lying, deception, and manipulation, for profit tor self-amusement,
3. Impulsive behavior
Page 12
What about the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT?

Or the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE?

Are they sociopaths?

Is Ms. Butler a sociopath?

The description provided sounds EXACTLY LIKE my experience with Ms. Butler.

Sooner or later civil society (which is a living organism as opposed to a


corpse like a corporation), will act to confine the sociopaths in their
society.

More disturbing corporate records indicate:

4.) Executive Office Of The President


725 17th St Nw Room 5200
Washington, DC 20503 - View Map
Phone: (202) 395-7244

Executive Office Of The President


A privately held company in Washington, DC.

Business Information
Location Type Branch
SIC Code 9111, Executive Offices
NAICS Code 921110, Executive Offices
Business Categories

Executive Offices in Washington, DC


Executive offices
Executive Office

I was unable to purchase other important records that are related to my legal
studies.

I was, however, able to garner this information that is worthy of mention, and
dire in its implication:

1.) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE


ULTIMATE PARENT COMPANY:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193 (ULTIMATE)
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Barrack H President

4. Irritability and aggression, manifested as frequently assaults


others, or engages in fighting
5. Blatantly disregards safety of self and others,
6. A pattern of irresponsibility and
7. Lack of remorse for actions (American Psychiatric Assoc., 2013)

The other diagnostic Criterion are:

B. The person is at least age 18,


C. Conduct disorder was present by history before age 15
D. and the antisocial behavior does not occur in the context of
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (American Psychiatric Association,
2013)
Page 13
2.) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193 (ULTIMATE)
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Barrack H President

3.) WHITE HOUSE OFFICE


ULTIMATE PARENT COMPANY:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193 (ULTIMATE)
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Barrack H President

4.) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES


ULTIMATE PARENT COMPANY:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193 (ULTIMATE)
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Barrack H President

5.) 9th Circuit Court


ULTIMATE PARENT COMPANY:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193 (ULTIMATE)
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Barrack H President

The greatest part of the President's job is to make decisions -- big


ones and small ones, dozens of them almost every day. The papers may
circulate around the Government for a while but they finally reach this
desk. And then, there's no place else for them to go. The President --
whoever he is -- has to decide. He can't pass the buck to anybody. No one
else can do the deciding for him. That is his job. See: Harry S. Truman,
Farewell Address January 15, 1953.

In the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton, the greatest proponent of


Federalism at the time of adoption of the Constitution, argued that the
President should be liable for his actions while in office.

This is the only plausible explanation I can figure out for a corporate record
that appears to still be domiciled at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw: GEORGE W.
BUSH - is that this corporation still exists to settle claims that may be
filed against it for its delegates errors, negligence or malfeasance among
other possible causes of action.

President Truman goes on to say:

I want all of you to realize how big a job, how hard a job, it is -- not
for my sake, because I am stepping out of it -- but for the sake of my
successor. He needs the understanding and the help of every citizen.

Page 14
As any proper Republican Citizen 5 should do Mr. Obama, I have attempted to
help reform an agency that has been operating illegally and unlawfully for
years among the States in the Union.

As set forth below, it appears that my efforts have had some effect on the
Internal Revenue Service and the United States Department of Justice (also
corporations domiciled at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw).

Another disturbing corporate record domiciled in Washington DC is STATE OF


HAWAII, 700 13 th St. Nw, Ste 400 Washington DC.

It appears to me that the UNLAWFUL State of Hawaii is domiciled in


Washington DC.

This corporation may be the Parent Corporation for the alleged State
(corporate offices) domiciled at 415 South Beretania St. Honolulu HI.

This corporate record of a State domiciled in Washington DC begged the


question: Are there other States corporations domiciled in Washington DC?

For every State I searched for in Washington DC I found a corporate record.

Such records, together with the State of Hawaii Tax Division assessments
against me that indicate they are based on IRS records, indicate to me that
the State of Hawaii Tax Division has a tax treaty with one or more of the
corporate listings that you are President of pursuant to 26 U.S. Code 638.

Oh, and by the way - the State of Hawaii Tax Division refused to produce the
alleged assessments as well.

5
What I have desired to do is to make the people of Boston realize that the
most important office, and the one which all of us can and should fill, is that of
private citizen. The duties of the office of private citizen cannot under a republican
form of government be neglected without serious injury to the public. Louis D.
Brandeis in a statement to a reporter in the Boston Record, 14 April 1903. (quoted in
Alpheus Thomas Mason, Brandeis: A Free Man's Life (1946), p. 122.)

Nihil est enim illi prmcipi Deo, qui omnem hunc mundum regit, quod quidem in terris
fiat, acceptius, quam concilia ccetusque hominum jure sociati, qure civitates
appellantur. "...,.... Cicer. Somn. Sipion. Reg. En. t. IV, 422.

1. NATIONS or states are bodies politic, societies of men united together for the
purpose of promoting their mutual safety and advantage by the joint efforts of their
combined strength.
2. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes
resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person, who possesses an understanding
and a will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights.
Reprinted fr. Law of Nations, E.M Vattel, 6th Ed. , Philadelphia: T. & J. W. Johnson,
Law Booksellers (1844).

If it be asked, What is the most sacred duty and the greatest source of our security
in a Republic? The answer would be, An inviolable respect for the Constitution and
Laws the first growing out of the last... A sacred respect for the constitutional
law is the vital principle, the sustaining energy of a free government. Alexander
Hamilton, Essay in the American Daily Advertiser (August 28, 1794)

All mankind is born for perfection, and each shall attain it will he but follow his
natures duty. Now you shall hear how a man may become perfect, if he devotes himself
to the work ...[which] is natural to him. A man will reach perfection if he does his
duty as an act of worship to the Lord. ~ Bhagavad Gita
Page 15
Further, if States are domiciled in Washington DC, where are all of their
subsidiary corporations, i.e. municipal corporations domiciled?

THEY ARE NOT registered in their State Commerce and Consumer Affairs
Records, I have looked.

The United States corporations listed above are not listed on the Commerce and
Consumer Affairs Records of Washington DC either.

Why not?

This data leads me to believe that the State and County municipal
corporations are subsidiaries of the Corporation entitled UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, and the penalties, fees and fines imposed by their municipal
courts are a subterfuge of the attorney profession and a tax revenue
generating scheme (Ponzi Scheme) - because SOMEONE has to pay the national
debt (or it will collapse).

The Attorney profession, in my estimation, is mostly ignorant of the part they


play in the scheme to defraud Americans to pay the National Debt (really a
territorial debt). It may as well be the former slaves and everyone else that
can be convinced they are US citizens at birth.

Under this construction:

1.) an individual who is born in a State is NOT a US citizen or US


National at birth;
2.) in order to get a government job, an individual MUST declare
themselves a US citizen;
3.) the government agency FAILS to VERIFY this CLAIM;
4.) US citizens are liable to title 16, therefore EVERY individual who
gets a government job is liable to the tax code;
5.) allegedly private corporations who owe their existence and
personhood to the US Courts interpretation of the so-called
Fourteenth Amendment and are therefore US citizens at birth;
6.) Corporations have Withholding Agreements with the IRS and
require Form(s) I-9 Immigration Status and W-4 Withholding
CERTIFICATIONS (Perjury Statements) from individuals seeking
employment;
7.) When an individual offers alternative Certifications 6 for the
exact same purposes but deny US citizenship and LIABILITY for
taxation, that individual is DENIED EMPLOYMENT.

I have tried to get SOMEONE to show me facts that contradict these


conclusions.

One apparently CANNOT get answers from attorneys; look at how your attorney
delegates have responded (below).

I suspect that there is a Tax Treaty with the American Bar Association,
pursuant to 26 U.S. Code 638 who also have corporate offices in Washington
DC.

When an Attorney swears to the BAR he or she is swearing to uphold the BARs
interpretation of law and procedure.

6
Attached above.

Page 16
I have fought State allegations, and after exposing this constructive fraud
to the degree possible by a layperson, criminal allegations and charges
against me were dismissed.

Similar responses from State attorneys,(that is prosecutors, defense and


Attorney Generals) when seeking explanations for these corporate records:
SILENCE.

I have an active RICO investigation into the State of Hawai`i and the
County of Hawai`i.

I am stymied by my inability to follow the leads available because I dont


have the Subpoena Power of the average U.S. Attorney.

Clearly, attorneys have special privileges.

This is what the Anti-federalists warned:

1.) If the Constitution were ratified it would give rise to a


privileged class.

I have personal objections to the Constitution. The most important are:

That document permitted slavery, and as a result it has never been a


true reflection of the ideals of Republicanism.

That flaw has been exploited by attorneys to enslave US citizens into


paying the national debt at EVERY encounter with so-called law
enforcement as public policy.

That sounds like Fascism to me.

How does the attorney profession that practices law do this on a DAILY
BASIS:

A.) Like other Americans, attorneys are led to believe that they are
US Citizens at birth due to public school indoctrination;
B.) they further their own indoctrination in Law School;
C.) they Declare themselves US Citizens and swear to uphold the US
Constitution for their Oath of Office as BAR Representatives;
D.) without knowing the law they perjure themselves because they have
not been naturalized as US Citizens;
E.) Police Officers are in exactly the same shoes:

Imposters holding an Office for which they ARE NOT QUALIFIED because they
dont know who they are -

ARE THEY INSANE?

F.) The Advanced Degree attorneys receive, and the training police
officers receive at Police Academy is usually enough for average
attorneys and police officers to believe they actually know and
practice law...they dont - they learn and practice fraudulent
procedure;
G.) Many attorneys become legislators, (UNLAWFUL pursuant to the
Original Thirteenth Amendment which appeared in all State and
Territorial Constitutions until after the Civil War), who then
write the laws for State and Federal Government;
H.) Title 16 of the US Code does not apply in the States - ONLY IN THE

Page 17
TERRITORIES;
I.) Title 18 of the US Code DOES APPLY IN THE STATES;
J.) ANY attorney would advise a client is subject to title 16 and MUST
PAY FEDERAL TAXES ON FORM 1040 AND NEVER TELL THEM ABOUT FORM 2555
FOREIGN EARNED INCOME AND THE EXEMPTION AVAILABLE ON THAT FORM;
K.) ANY attorney would advise a client that title 18 does
not apply in the States when claiming the affirmative
defense that an individual is not Driving a Motor Vehicle.
L.) NO attorney would advise a client to claim as an affirmative
defense that he or she was traveling in
their automobile - personal property pursuant to
title 15, rather than operating a motor vehicle COMMERCIAL terms
defined pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 31;
M.) NO attorney would ADMIT THAT THE COURTS ARE ALWAYS OPERATING IN
ADMIRALTY/MARITIME JURISDICTION.

When one considers this objectively in conjunction with the corporate records
indicating the domicile of the States (a corporate person) is in
Washington DC, this line of reasoning supports the conclusion that State and
County Municipal Corporations are part of a Pyramid Scheme to collect a non-
existent debt which operates out of Washington DC.

NON-EXISTENT DEBT?

Fiat currency is not money - it is a means of exchange in lieu of money that


has value by government decree.

I propose we cut out the middleman!

There is no rational basis for paying interest to private bankers for doing
something that the government could do for free.

China does.

They are buying the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT by buying its debt (bonds).

In corporate finance when a corporation FAILS, Bondholders are paid first.

Shareholders only get anything that may remain once Bondholders are FULLY
paid.

What happens if they get a controlling interest and decide to foreclose?

Your delegates used people with guns to start this controversy and guns to get
me out of my home: I asked a local policeman who I knew personally (outside of
his Office) how he would respond to the courts Order if I showed him they
would not produce the Assessments in the Foreclosure Action.

He said he would OBEY the courts Order.

Do you think China will use force to secure its interest?

The Grace Commission determined that ALL the Income Tax collected didnt cover
the interest on the Federal Debt in 1982.

That interest payment MUST BE MADE TODAY ONLY BY MORE DEBT SINCE ALL INCOME
TAX COLLECTED CANNOT COVER THE INTEREST TODAY.

Even IF ALL illegal aliens Naturalized, CAN all their future earnings be

Page 18
enough to cover the interest payments today?

2.) The Constitution would cause factionalism.

It sure does.

The Historical Record indicates that the second iteration of the temporary
US Government was effectively dissolved when Congress adjourned sine die on
March 28, 1861.

After receiving a twenty million dollar loan to prosecute the war, on April
15, 1861 (Federal Income Tax Due Date) the now PRIVATE State Citizen, Abraham
Lincoln AND ATTORNEY (with an Oath to the BAR) from the State of Illinois
declared himself President of the United States and called for the new
government to meet on July 4, 1861.

That man caused damages to Americans that still reverberate in many ways.

Nowadays most Americans THINK they are celebrating The Declaration Of


Independence on July 4, however, I am not convinced when I consider the
Historical Record of the Civil War period.

Lincoln didnt do it to free the slaves as I was led to believe in Public


School, he did it to preserve the Union - a euphemism for somebody still
has to pay the bankers who have funded the government since the Revolution.

Lincoln, based on the Historical Record, implemented a soft-fascism


military rule in a civil society through General Orders 100.

The Civil War was allegedly over one hundred and fifty years ago, President
Johnson assured Americans that we have returned to a Republican Form of
government.

The language of the Fourteenth Amendment does kind-of sound like the
Congress has declared war on the American people to force them to accept the
NEW Federal Government.

The North did just win the war.

Then THAT Congress seated a Rump Congress to pass an Amendment and used
the Power of the Executive to enforce it.

One vision of America hopes for fifty States practicing different levels of
Republican liberty, unified by a central government promoting true Republican
liberty, resulting in a more and more liberal society; a more just and fair
world.

This would revolutionize the world and permit us access to the Universe.

Can you really see humankind traveling to distant worlds to CONQUER AND
ENSLAVE THE SPECIES WE ENCOUNTER with our modern understanding of the
Universe?

Rather than opening the door to that potentiality, the allegedly


Constitutional Order that is being practiced appears to be one man at the top
who has plenary power and individuals have none.

His (or her) delegates exercise this power for their own profit, and he (or
she) gives them awards for good service.

Page 19
He or she is GOD.

When the facts in our controversy are considered objectively, the type of
system becomes obvious.

Your delegates created the artifice.

Your delegates prosecuted the artifice.

Your delegates heard the Complaint and weighed the evidence.

Your delegates, the US Attorneys or State attorneys - depending on the venue,


procedures and testimonies being the deciding factor.

Yes, testimony from INSANE PEOPLE - they dont know who they are; they dont
know where they were born; they most often dont know where they are; they
dont know their political status or citizenship.

Here are two questions to ask just about any American to see how propagandized
they are:

1.) Are you a US citizen?


2.) Are you in the US at this moment?

No matter where they were born in the federation they were led to believe that
they are US citizens instead of Citizens of their States.

More often than not, no matter where they are in the federation, they believe
that they are in Washington DC, the territorial district of the United States.

People like this have been deluded.

They would be classified as insane under normal circumstances.

The public education system has completely FAILED!

Political philosophers all agree that a proper education is required to


preserve the Republic.

It is written into the Organic Documents: the people are to be educated in the
principals of republicanism - in order to preserve it!

Who is President of THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION?

The leaders of these factions, in the interest of commerce, used their


influence to propagandize people into unproductive dualism that spawned the
Civil War and every single war since.

It is also driving unproductive dualism between so called Christians and


Muslims today.

Rather than use different points of view to sort out and find the best
solution to any particular problem, the factions are being (mis)led to
opposite extremes.

This is not productive for a global superpower.

The symptoms of the ill body politic are eerily similar to Germanys Weimar
Republic.

Page 20
I dont want any part of it.

As a father, I believe my first duty is to reconcile and bring healing to my


family who has been torn apart by the actions of your delegates.

My preference is to take what I have learned and write childrens stories in


some far off land.

Quoting Justice Brandeis again:


The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the
pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's spiritual nature,
of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain,
pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in material things. They sought
to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their
sensations. They conferred, as against the government, the right to be let alone
-- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.
See: Dissenting opinion, Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928).

Quoting Justice Brandeis again:


Through size, corporations, once merely an efficient tool employed by
individuals in the conduct of private business have become an
institution-an institution which has brought such concentration of
economic power that so-called private corporations are sometimes able to
dominate the state. The typical business corporation of the last century,
owned by a small group of individuals, managed by their owners, and
limited in size by their private wealth, is being supplanted by huge
concerns in which the lives of tens or hundreds of thousands of employees
and the property of tens of hundreds of thousands of investors are
subjected, through the corporate mechanism, to the control of a few men.
Ownership has been separated from control; and this separation has
removed many of the checks which formerly operated to curb the misuse of
wealth and power. See: Dissenting opinion, Liggett Co. v. Lee, 288 U.S.
517 (1933), at 565-67.

Mr. Obama, I believe the mythology being promulgated by powerful institutions


is being played out in reality due to Quantum Mechanics. Cf. Platos Cave.

I believe OUR children DESERVE a better myth that propels humanity into a
better future for everyone.

I wish to be a part of telling stories of a bright future that give hope to


people.

....

The crimes committed by delegates of these corporations were while they were
in the district and therefore against the United States. See: Metropolitan
Railroad Company v. Dist. of Columbia, 132 US 1, 9 - Supreme Court (1889).

The Congressional intent of RICO legislation states:

It is the purpose of this Act to seek the eradication of


organized crime in the United States by strengthening the legal
tools in the evidence-gathering process, by establishing new penal
prohibitions, and by providing enhanced sanctions and new remedies
to deal with the unlawful activities of those engaged in organized
crime.

I will require being appointed a Private Attorney General in order to resolve


this, in order to continue the investigation with the power and dignity of the
United States supporting me.

Page 21
I intend to retire, retaining the Privileges of that Appointment so that my
family and me are protected from further controversies with your delegates
among the States.

Given my findings regarding a fair trial, above, and in consideration of the


vested interests of the persons involved, a fair trial is impossible under
the present regime and perhaps under any regime in the UNITED STATES corporate
courts - what does their Corporate CHARTER (Constitution) actually say?

As set forth below, Congress also has attempted to curtail the abuses of this
organization (IRS) - a leftover from The Civil War who has become rank
indeed!

I wish to settle our controversy prior to you leaving the offices of which you
are President.

In an effort to bring the facts as I understand them up to date:

I previously had reported the fraud to the Tax Inspector General for
Administration (TIGTA) - who had a duty to investigate.

Here is their initial response to my complaint number 55-1101-0041-C:

Thank you for the information you provided to the Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Administration (TIGTA). This office will review your
complaint and evaluate it for appropriate action. TIGTAs
responsibilities include the investigation of criminal impropriety within
Federal tax administration and serious misconduct by Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) employees. In addition, TIGTA works closely with the IRS
to oversee the appropriate adjudication of complaints that are under the
purview of IRS management, and to provide information about other
concerns involving tax administration to the IRS for appropriate
determination.
Please note that TIGTA is bound by Federal confidentiality statutes that
limit the dissemination of information regarding TIGTAs law enforcement
activities, including actions taken as a result of complaints filed with
TIGTA.

They didnt investigate the fraud and give me findings as I requested...

Nor did they intervene to oversee the appropriate adjudication of (my)


complaint...

I learned, in a response REQUIRING TWO FOIA Requests, that instead of


investigating the evidence I provided, they investigated me and determined
that I had questions about the tax code.

TIGTA is NOT supposed to be controlled by the Associate Chief Counsel


(Procedure & Administration).

WHO ORDERED THEM NOT TO INVESTIGATE NOR INTERVENE TO ADJUDICATE MY COMPLAINT?

On May 15, 2013 I tendered the facts and evidence used to foreclose my home in
a Request to your delegate Ms. Deborah Butler, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure & Administration).

I also sent my Request to Ms. Kirsten Wielobob, Director of Technical


Services, Appeals, so Ms. Butler would not simply round file my Request.

Among Ms. Butlers duties is to respond to Requests for [a] ruling is a

Page 22
written statement issued to [me] by the National Office which interprets and
applies the tax statutes to a specific set of facts. See: 26 C.F.R.
601.201(2).

TIGTA determined I had questions about the tax code and provided no answers.

I asked Ms. Butler my questions about the tax code and rather than answer,
she retired.

Ms. Wielobob never responded either.

That makes you responsible, they are your delegates.

The only publically available information on Ms. Butler is a blog entry that
indicates she would retire in March of 2013.

If she did retire before receiving my Request, certainly her superior officers
could have had some sort of response.

I suppose at this point that issue is moot because I am asking YOU to respond
to all the Requests I have made.

If your delegates are charged with various duties and they fail to perform
them, it falls to you to do their jobs or ultimately suffer the consequences
for their failures.

Who better than you, Mr. Obama, a former Constitutional Law Professor and
Attorney, would have the knowledge, skills and practice to consider the facts
as they were set forth in the litigation to foreclose my home.

It would suit me fine if you responded to the Request I made of Ms. Butler
regarding the facts and evidence in that case.

Further, please respond to the Requests I made of your delegate Ms. Keneally.

All of the documents should be readily available in the case file listed in
the header of this letter (CDCS Claim No. 2012A00665).

I believe you also understand the consequences should you FAIL TO ACT.

My research into the statutes and regulations have led me to certain


conclusions I sought to have your delegates clarify.

They fell silent and any further discussion of those facts may have resulted
in estoppel on the facts and evidence used to foreclose my security interest
in my home in Hawaii.

When neither officer responded within the statutory period for that claim I
sent a new claim for compensation from damages in the amount of six million,
two hundred thirty three thousand, five hundred sixty six dollars and fifty
three cents ($6,233,566.53) via a Process Server, The Carter Corporation.

The Chief Counsels Office had six months to decide what to do with my
allegations and I decided to let every official who was potentially going to
be affected by a Compliant in federal court know of their delegates actions.

Mr. William J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service was notified of
his delegates errors and failed to respond.

Mr. Jacob J. Lew, U. S. Secretary of the Treasury was notified of his


Page 23
delegates errors and failed to respond.

There is evidence to suggest that the IRS is NOT part of the Treasury
Department.

If this is true, then every piece of mail that implies that they are is
evidence of Mail Fraud, each instance punishable under statute.

Mr. John Koskinen, Commissioner of the IRS was notified of his delegates
errors and failed to respond.

When six months time had elapsed I received a response.

It was from TaxFlu asking me to pay the debt claimed by IRS Officials.

On February 18, 2014, I wrote to Ms. Kathryn Keneally, Assistant Attorney


General for the Tax Division and requested an administrative adjustment of the
competing claims and warning her of potential consequences if she failed to
act.

She did not respond.

On April 11, 2014, I sent Ms. Keaneally Discovery Requests pursuant to Statute
and Regulations in response to her initial communication to collect a debt.

On May 27, 2014 Ms. Keneally left the Department of Justice Tax Division.

Given the foregoing it would appear that the individuals who created and
prosecuted the artifice that resulted in my claims for damages have retired or
left public service AS A RESULT OF THEIR ARTIFICE BEING EXPOSED.

CLEARLY I HAVE EXHAUSTED MY ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES!

Tamara W. Ashford, who was Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Tax
Division, and replaced Ms. Kathryn Keneally, effective June 6, 2014 appears to
have left that position since I wrote to Florence T. Nakakuni, Esq. Senior
United States Attorney for the District of Hawaii, on March 3, 2015 warning
her of a pending RICO Complaint and asking her to help resolve the controversy
without such litigation.

The Department of the Treasury may pay for the settlement or compromise
of a claim against a Department employee at any time, provided the
Secretary or his or her designee determines that (1) the alleged conduct
giving rise to the claim was within the scope of the employee's
employment and (2) such settlement or compromise is in the interest of
the Department of the Treasury. See: 31 CFR 3.30 (b).

On March 4, 2016 Ms Butler was given the Kenneth H. Liles Award by Mr. William
J. Wilkins, Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service for her service.

Clearly Mr. Wilkens determined that Ms. Butlers conduct giving rise to the
claim was within the scope of the employee's employment and (2) determined
that such settlement or compromise is [NOT] in the interest of the Department
of the Treasury and he has assured her of continued freedom for her silence
in this controversy.

Ms. Keaneally has joined a private firm and is continuing her career.

It appears from the gracious farewell from your delegate Eric Holder, Attorney
General of the United States that she too has a contract that may protect her
Page 24
from any further concerns about incarceration or civil liability for damages
incurred from her actions.

It appears that the determination of your administration is that their conduct


was under the authority of the President of the Internal Revenue Service but
NOT permissible by the construction of statutes, under the supervision of the
Executive - otherwise they would have remained in office.

In other words: you, Mr. Obama, have taken responsibility for their fraud as
President of the IRS, a subsidiary corporation of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

It appears that Ms. Butler sought refuge to protect her artifice by claiming
Executive Privilege rather than face the consequences of fraud upon the
court when the key piece of her artifice - the assessments - could not be
produced. This leaves me to conclude - with my other findings - that ONLY I
can assess myself.

I ascertained this first when two alleged Certificate of Assessments claimed


different amounts of taxes due, yet an assessment balance due of zero
dollars in both Certificates were used as evidence to foreclose my
interest in my home.

This was confirmed for me when I first filed a Complaint against you for the
production of the assessments, wherein I finally found Ms. Butler when she
claimed such executive privilege to avoid admitting her role in the artifice
created.

She blamed the artifice on you and walked away.

I suppose she is enjoying her retirement.

These facts are reasonably concluded by reviewing my voluminous file and


comparing the facts and evidence used to foreclose on my security interest
in my home, and what was presented to Ms. Butler who had a duty to respond.

When Ms. Keneally was questioned regarding Ms. Butlers role, she resigned
rather than answer.

Congress has made its position on the tax code very clear:

1.) The statutes and regulations indicate that the Tax Code does not
have jurisdiction beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the
United States. See: 26 U.S. Code 638.

2.) "Ab initio un excluso" is a RULE of STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION that


what is NOT INCLUDED is EXCLUDED.

3.) filing Information Returns (FORM 1040) is voluntary for average


Americans.

In a Republic the Executive Office is directed by the Statutes and Regulations


of Congress.

It has been a long standing principal of United States Law that the President
Executes the WILL of Congress - the Statutes and Regulations.

The power of Congress to adopt such public policies as those proclaimed


by the [Statutes and Regulations] is beyond question... The Constitution
does not subject this lawmaking power of Congress to presidential or
military supervision or control. See: Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v.
Page 25
Sawyer, 343 US 579, 588, Supreme Court (1952).

The unlawful construction of statutes promulgated by your delegates, the fraud


they committed against the court, and each violation identified in my
Request for Admissions to Ms. Keneally, has resulted in major damages to me
and my children that may be discharged by any one of, or proportionally among,
the corporations you have domiciled at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw,
Washington, DC 20500.

I fully realize how confusing the facts and evidence in this case are and
perhaps too confusing for a jury made up of propagandized Americans. See:
U.S. v. BRENNER, 14 Fed. Appx. 185, 2001 WL 798692 (C.A.4(Va.)), 88 A.F.T.R2d
2001-5149, 2001-2 USTC P 50,535 (UNPUBLISHED).

They are likely a matter of National Security as well.

Crimes against the United States are International crimes, as RICO is.

That leaves the International Criminal Court at The Hague and potentially
embarrassing disclosures and color-able legacy for you and your
Administration.

I would much rather close my account at the Internal Revenue Service and write
childrens stories.

The choice is in your hands Mr. Obama.

I wish you Happy Holidays and Bon Voyage but it bears repeating: FAILURE TO
RESPOND MAY RESULT IN ESTOPPEL ON ALL ISSUES RAISED HEREIN!

VERIFICATION

I, Michael William Flaherty, sui juris, hereby verify, under penalty of


perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the United
States in the Kingdom of Hawai`i (OFFICES UNOCCUPIED), that I am the one
submitting this Request for Settlement pursuant to 26 CFR 301.7426-2, 26 U.S.
Code 7433, 26 U.S. Code 7434, 26 U.S. Code 7422 and 18 U.S. Code 1861,
and I hereby verify same according to the best of My current information,
knowledge, and belief, so help me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). See
Supremacy Clause (Constitution, Laws and Treaties of the United States are all
the supreme Law of the Land).

I DECLARE THAT I am ONE OF the free inhabitants of each of these States. . .


[and] shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in
the several States pursuant to Article IV, ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION (1777),
and a citizen of a State, pursuant to Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 of the
Constitution of the United States of America, and now, after the adoption of
the Fourteenth Amendment, entitled to the privileges and immunities of
citizens of the several States, under Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 of the
Constitution. As such, a citizen of a State, under Article IV, Section 2,
Clause 1 of the Constitution, is now also a citizen of the several States,
under Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution; that is, a citizen
of a State AS WELL AS a citizen of the several States.

In speaking of the meaning of the phrase privileges and immunities of


citizens of the several States under section second, article fourth, of the
Constitution, it was said by the present Chief Justice, in Cole v.
Cunningham, 133 U.S. 107, that the intention was to confer on the citizens
of the several States a general citizenship, and to communicate all the

Page 26
privileges and immunities which the citizens of the same State would be
entitled to under the like circumstances, and this includes the right to
institute actions. See: Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581, at 592 (1900).

Sincerely,

Michael W. Flaherty
Federal Witness (18 U.S.C. 1512, 1513)
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

/////

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, Michael William Flaherty hereby certify that I personally served the


following document(s):
Re: United States of America v. Michael William Flaherty, et al.
Case No. 1:08-cv-000493 (D.H.)
CDCS Claim No. 2012A00665

Request for Settlement pursuant to


26 CFR 301.7426-2, 26 U.S. Code 7433,
26 U.S. Code 7434, 26 U.S. Code 7422
and 18 U.S. Code 1861.

via Certified Mail #7015 0640 0001 9494 9874, prepaid and properly addressed
to the following:

Mr. Barrack H. Obama, President November 28, 2016


The White House
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
DUNS NO. 16-190-6193
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20500
Phone: (202) 456-1414

Page 27

You might also like