Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Administration and Purpose of this Assignment: This assignment is given to candidates in the
EDUC 390 series of courses (clinical experience prior to student teaching) and again during the EDUC
490 series (student teaching). The purpose of the assignment is to measure candidates proficiency
with ADEPT Performance Standards (APSs) 1, 2 and 3 and the SLO process, which are required
evaluation components of newly licensed teachers in South Carolina.
Minimal Level of Proficiency: Candidates must meet the expectations for all indicators in the
FMU SLO Scoring Rubric in order to successfully complete the assignment.
Directions: Candidates should complete each section of the SLO template below with sufficient
detail and accuracy. To do this, candidates should refer to the SLO scoring rubric and any relevant
training/directions provided to candidates during the EDUC course.
SLO Evaluator Position/Role: Instructor of Clinical Experience (ECE, ELE, and MLE)
Choose One
Year
I. Student Population
A. Provide a detailed description of the student population
by completing the table below. Information (Contextual Factors) should
include, but is not limited to, the following: the number of students in the class, a
description of students with exceptionalities (e.g., learning disability, gifted and
talented, English language learner [ELL] status, etc.), gender/race, reading levels,
lunch status, family status, learning styles, common interests of the students, etc
(Key Element 1.A)
18 students
18 students total:
Gender CT
12 females, 6 males
18 students total:
Race 4 Caucasian, 14 African CT
American
18 students total:
18 students total:
2 students with RL of
0.2-0.5,
Reading Levels CT
1 student with RL of 0.7-
1.0,
2 students with RL of
1.0-1.3,
Page 3 of 24 Developed using the SC SDE
SLO template created May 2016
7 students with RL of 1.1-
1.4,
3 students with RL of 1.2-
1.5,
2 students with RL of 1.5-
1.8
1 student with RL of 2.5-
2.8
18 students total:
3 scored Low,
2 scored High.
18 students total:
8 students made an A,
Test Scores from
Previous lesson (Adding 4 students made a B, CT
Doubles)
5 students made a C,
1 student made a D.
21 students total:
2 auditory learners
Learning Styles Asked students
12 visual learners
7 kinesthetic learners
Note: The teacher and lunch staff told me they were not allowed to tell me the students lunch
status.
B. Provide a description of academic supports provided to
students (e.g., extended time, resource time with EC teacher, any classroom
supports that students receive to help them access the core curriculum).
(Key Element 1.A)
There is one student that goes to Enhanced Learning, which means the student is an advanced learner
who is performing above his grade level. He goes to a specialist who gives him tests to see where he is
developmentally and gives him work to challenge him as well.
In the classroom, there is an assistant that goes around and helps all first-grade classes and teachers. If
students do not finish something they get extended time to finish it with the assistant and sometimes can
take it home and finish it for homework.
For ELA, students take turns every Friday and go read a book to a retired teacher in the school library.
This teacher helps them to improve their reading and gives feedback to the CT
For this lesson (and any others applicable) students each had their own laminated ten frame and foam
counters as manipulatives to work with.
The article I have chosen lists some ways to differentiate instruction. One way the article mentions is
presenting ideas through both auditory and visual means. To benefit auditory learners, I played a video
that sings a song about odd and even numbers (on day 1). On day 2, I had students read along with me and
read aloud a poem about odd and even numbers. Also, when I gave students an assessment, I read the
directions aloud to them. Due to one of their contextual factors I note, I know that the students are on
different reading levels. Some are still on a kindergarten reading level. So, I feel it is important for me to
read the directions and questions aloud, so that the students will comprehend it better.
Page 5 of 24 Developed using the SC SDE
SLO template created May 2016
In the contextual factors, I included that there is one students who goes to enhanced learning, because he
is performing above his grade level. In the contextual factors, I also said there are 2 students who are
repeating the 1st grade and 2 students who were recommended to be held back in kindergarten, but did
not. Knowing these factors about these students will help me guide instruction. I know that for the student
who goes to enhanced learning, I will need to have an advanced learner guided practice, independent
practice and assessment for them, if needed. For the students who are repeating the first grade, I will keep
in mind to monitor their progress. I will help them if they need help. If they understand the content no
problem, I will have an advanced learner assessment for them to complete if I feel they are ready. (They
may be advanced in some standards, since this is their second time in the first grade.) For the students
who were recommended to be held back, but declined, I will make sure to monitor their progress closely,
when walking around the classroom. I will help them when/if they need help with this lesson. If I think
they need more practice. I will set up a small group lesson to reteach the lesson to them/those who are
behind. These are ways that I can differentiate instruction between students, as are talked about in the
article Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades.
(Tomlinson, Carl Ann. "Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades Eric.ed.gov. ERIC Digest,
Aug. 2000. Web. 26 Oct. 2016.)
Objective:
Students will be able to determine whether a number through 10 is odd or even by using pairings of
objects, counting by twos, or finding two equal addends to represent the number.
Objective: Students will be able to determine whether a number through 10 is odd or even by using
pairings of objects, counting by twos, or finding two equal addends to represent the number.
In Kindergarten, students learned how to count by twos. For this lesson students, will be pairing objects
to determine if that number is odd or even.
Day #1:
Materials: Smart Board, dry erase board and markers, ten frame with magnetic manipulatives, pencils,
guided practice worksheet copies, independent practice worksheet copies, formal assessment worksheet
copies, early finishers copies, advanced learner copies, pumpkin seeds manipulatives (not needed for day
2), crayons.
Smart Board.
When students take their pre and post assessments, I will read the directions and questions aloud to them
and read the multiple answer choices too, telling them to select which answer they believe is right. These
students are only 6 or 7 years old. Most read on a first grade reading level, but some read on a
kindergarten level. I believe reading the directions, questions and/or answer choices will help the students
better understand the assessment.
For students of different developmental levels, I will have specific ways to help them. I will have a more
challenging worksheet for advanced learners. For students who need more help, I will reteach the lesson
to them/the small group. For students who finish their work early, I will have another worksheet for them
to do as additional practice.
Unit Length
Unit Topic Description (i.e., approximate
dates.)
During non-instructional times, (which is anytime outside the classroom, the hallway, cafeteria, special
area, and recess) I expect students to walk in an alphabetical ordered line, I expect them to face forward
and not to talk in the hallway. In special area, they need to follow that teachers rules. In the cafeteria,
students are not allowed to talk until they are finished eating their lunch.
When students misbehave, they get their close pin moved. The order from good ranking to bad is Paw-
tastic Think about Teachers choice and Principals Office.
If students show good behavior, then may get a paw-buck. This is printed money that students can use to
buy things from the school store.
For my lesson, students will work with a ten frame and counters, using the pairing method to see if a
number 1-10 is odd or even.
Before my lesson, students learned about adding doubles and used the ten frame and counters when doing
so. Students already had prior knowledge of how to represent numbers on a ten frame using counters.
Student scores on the adding doubles lesson are listed below:
8 students made an A,
4 students made a B,
5 students made a C,
1 student made a D.
VI.
A pre-assessment will be given before the 3-day unit is taught. (Pre-assessment is shown below.)
The pre-test asks students to identify numbers (0-10) as even or odd. The criteria for mastery is to get 12
out of 15 correct. (Questions 1, 2, 3 and 4 are worth 1 point each. Each number listed under question 5 is
worth 1 point each. Students will get the point if they correctly circle the even numbers and box the odd
numbers.)
A 90-100
B 80-89
C 70-79
D 60-69
F 59 and below
Reliability is the degree to which an assessment tool produces stable and consistent results.
( https://www.uni.edu/chfasoa/reliabilityandvalidity.htm )
I have now already taught my lesson. My lesson was reliable, but not valid. It was reliable because it
yielded consistent answers from students. It was not valid because it was not completely aligned with my
standard and objective. My pre/post-assessment did test students on their knowledge of odd and even
numbers 1-10, but it did not test it by having them use pairing like the standard stated. (I would change
this about my lesson! My assessments at the end of day 1 and day 2 were aligned with my
standard/objective, but my pre/post-tests were not.)
Day #1:
Independent Practice: I will give each student a worksheet with 3 problems on it. I will then tell them to
draw circles, pairing them like I showed them earlier. Then to chose answer a.) Even or b.) Odd
Assessment: I will give students a formative assessment called Even and Odd Numbers.
Day #2:
Independent Practice: I will have students complete a worksheet where they must come up with an even
or odd number and color smiley faces to represent that number
Assessment: Students will complete an assessment where they must count the number of flowers on a
stem, and determine if the number is odd or even.
Post-assessment/summative assessment: This will test students knowledge of odd and even numbers 1-10.
Assessment Weight
I will record students grades in a google excel document. I want to record the grades of everything to track
students progress. Google excel will saved changes automatically in Google Docs. For extra backup, I will
have a print out of students grades and keep them in the teachers filing cabinet.
Individual (All students have individualized growth targets based on previous performance
and expectations.)
Targeted (Sub population(s) of students are the focus of the SLO goal. Appropriate for course
approach as a
after
mine)
Not Met: 9
Exceeded: 4
Only 3 students out of 16 met their growth target, 4 out of 16 students exceeded their growth target, and 9
out of 16 did not meet their growth target. I believed that many students did not meet their growth target,
because my post-assessment was not aligned with my standard and objective. The post-test did ask about
Page 21 of 24 Developed using the SC SDE
SLO template created May 2016
odd and even numbers 1-10, however it did not talk about pairing objects to determine the answer. If my
post-test was aligned, I believe it would have yielded better results with more students meeting growth
targets.
My CT looked over the growth targets I set for each student. She liked that I had high expectations. She
told me that she believed most of my students would meet their target, but that there would still be a few
who would not. She pointed out some students who struggle when learning a new topic/lesson. She
pointed out students 14, 17, 18, 20 and 21. She told me if I was to lower a growth target for any students,
she would advise doing so for those students. I ultimately did not change their growth targets, because I
believed they would improve more. Perhaps, I should have.
For the lesson my CT taught before my 3-day unit, students scored an average 82.7%. On the lesson my CT
taught after my 3-day unit, students scored an average 79.5%. I believe her students did well on these
because my CTs lesson was completely aligned. Also, my CT spent more than 2 days teaching her lesson.
I believe a strength of this class was their behavior. They all had good behavior and followed my
expectations while I taught my unit. I believe a weakness of this class over all was attendance. Although
that cannot always be controlled, I consider it a weakness. The students who were absent missed out on
instruction. This had an impact on their grades and whether they met or did not met their growth target.
The students that were present may have to sit through a re-teaching of the lesson. Which would not be
very beneficial to them. I did not do this in my lesson, but it is an option.
2.ATO.3 Determine whether a number through (10) 20 is odd or even using pairings of objects, counting
by twos, or finding two equal addends to represent the number (e.g., 3 + 3 = 6).
Objective:
Students will be able to determine whether a number through 10 is odd or even using pairings of objects,
counting by twos, or finding two equal addends to represent the number.
I need to modify my pre-and post-assessment to make sure they are aligned to my standard and objective.
Although my modeling, guided practice, independent practice and daily assessment were all aligned to my
standard and objective, my pre-and post-test was not. My pre-and post-test did assess students on their
knowledge of odd and even numbers, but did not have them use pairings of objects to determine so. I
believe the assessments not being aligned is a big reason why students did not do well on the post-
Page 22 of 24 Developed using the SC SDE
SLO template created May 2016
assessment. The class scored an average of 65.1%.
The other modification I would make to my 3-day unit, would be to include a hands-on activity for day 2.
On day 1 I did a hands-on activity for guided practice. Students represented a number 1-10 by pairing
pumpkin seeds. They determined from looking at the seed pairings if the number was odd or even. This
activity benefited both kinesthetic and visual learners. The majority of my class are kinesthetic learners
(12 out of 21 students) and many are visual learners (7 out of 21 students). This is why I would include
another hands-on activity for day 2.
If I replaced my post-test/summative assessment with the assessment from day 2 of my lesson, I think
that would more accurately represent the students growth and success. This is chart (below) of students
pre-test grades, growth target, post-test grade and if they met, not met to exceed their target.
2 53 80 100 Exceeded
4 47 80 ABSENT N/A
7 40 70 30 Not met
12 6 70 100 Exceeded
13 66 80 ABSENT N/A
14 47 75 100 Exceeded
16 66 80 50 Not met
17 26 70 90 Exceeded
18 20 70 50 Not met
19 40 70 100 Exceeded
20 60 80 ABSENT N/A
21 40 70 ABSENT N/A
This assessment was aligned to the standard and objective I covered on my lesson. If I used this as my
post-test/summative assessment, it would show that students better understood the lesson.