Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
In Bangladesh, where most people are supplied from the groundwater for drinking,
about 40 million people are currently exposed to the risk of arsenic poisoning. We have
carried out the investigation for elucidation of arsenic elution mechanism in the
groundwater at the two model villages, namely Samta and Marua, in Bangladesh at 9 times
since March 1997. Here, we compare the characteristics of arsenic pollution between the
two villages on the arsenic elution mechanism to the groundwater.
These results show that (1) the arsenic is mainly included in the organic substance of
soil, (2) the arsenic concentration in groundwater is closely related to the muddy layers
distribution, and (3) arsenic elution to groundwater is caused in the reduced state.
Key word : Bangladesh, arsenic pollution, elution mechanism , reduced state, water quality
1. INTRODUCTION
Arsenic pollution of the groundwater in Bangladesh is confirmed at 61 in 64 districts
(British Geology Survey, 2001) and this fact is widely known. But, the actual condition has not
been proven yet. Arsenic exists mainly with the iron mineral metallurgy and genus arsenate
in colliery and mine. In Bangladesh, from the size of extent of the pollution, the arsenic
origin seems to be the sediment carried by Ganges and Brahmaputra rivers. On the basis of
the investigation of the Ganges basin,
Chakraborty et al reported that arsenic elution
occur in oxidation state (Das, D., 1996 and
Chakraborti.D.,2000), meanwhile Nickson et
al.(2000) reported with that it occur in the
reduced state. However, arsenic elution
mechanism to the groundwater has not been
elucidated in the Ganges basin. Therefore, we
examined the arsenic elution to the
groundwater from the viewpoint of the water
quality survey in the two villages, Samta and Fig.1. Location of Samta village and
Marua villages, located at Jessor district, Marua village in Jessore, Bangladesh.
Bangladesh, where the arsenic pollution has
caused serious problems.
1
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
2.2 Analysis (m )
J 27A16 28B28
1.4 Flood
1.2 H 27B 1 29B 9 S ep.,2000
1 F 27B34 30A19 F
J
0.8 3 28A 5 3
J
0.6 B 3
JB
H
B
F
3
J J
H F
B
H
0.4 H
F F
J
0.2 B
H
3
B
F B
H
F
H
B
H
F
H
3
F
3
0 3
Mar.97 Oct.97 May.98 May.99 Nov.99 May.00 Mar.01 Jan.02 Jan.03
Fig.3. Time course plot of arsenic concentration of groundwater in Samta.
2
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
As(mg/kg)
As(mg/kg) As(mg/kg) As(mg/kg)
0 0.1 1
10 1020 100 30 0 10 20 30
0 10 20 30
3
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
concentration was higher than that of As5+, and Table 1 Water quality of groundwater in
arsenic concentration was high there. Fig.6 Samta Village on May 1998
Drinking Irrigation Drinking
shows the relationship between groundwater Items
(30-50m) (100m) (200m)
3+
quality and proportion of As for total As pH 7.1-7.6 7.2-7.3 7.5-7.6
(As3+ + As5+). There was a tendency that the EC (s/cm) 574-1192 806-1228 968-1373
point with a high proportion of As3+ have ORP (mv) -88 - -6 -52 - -3 -50 - 3
2+
higher concentration of arsenic, SiO2, Fe and As 3+,5+
(mgl -1
) 0.03-1.2 0.03-0.2 0.05-0.08
2+ -1
HCO3- and also higher EC and ORP values. Fe 3+ (mgl-1 ) 3.9-10.5 4.2-6.3 1.1-1.4
On the contrary, the place with high proportion Fe (mgl -
)
-1
0-1.0 0+0.6 0
HCO (mgl ) 179-432 340-358 381-392
of As5+ showed high concentration of NH4+ NH 3+(mgl-1) 0.1-8.4 3.0-8.1 0.5-2.0
4
and SO42- and high value of pH. On this fact, it K+(mgl-1) 2.1-14.7 3.1-10.9 5.1-15.8
is proposed that the groundwater is an Mg2+(mgl-1) 13-48 27-34 36-47
oxidation state, because fertilizer and oxygen Ca2+(mgl-1) 51-100 49-57 40-43
- -1
from the ground to the underground are taken F (mgl ) 0-4.4 0-1.3 1.0-2.4
in north in the village. The contour lines in Cl-(mgl-1) 0-58.3 4.0-14.3 26.5-48.4
Br-(mgl-1) 0-0.10 0-0.02 0.05-0.15
Fig.5 are distribution of thickness of the upper
NO3-(mgl-1) 0-0.40 0.01-0.08 0.03-0.05
muddy layer in the village. The thickness is SO42-(mgl-1) 0-7.9 0.1-0.3 0.2-0.5
variable among the places, for example,
thickness in the rice field in the northern area
(arsenic concentration of adjacent tubewells was 0-0.02 mgl-1) is 0 - 1 m, in northern part
( area with low arsenic concentration) is 1-3 m, in the middle area (arsenic concentration of
adjacent tubewells 0.3 mgl-1) is 6-12 m, in the southern area (where has high arsenic
concentration) is 4-6m and in the southern rice field is 3-4 m. We think that the thickness of
upper muddy layer is strongly related to the arsenic concentration in groundwater, because
the distribution of the upper muddy layer resembles the distribution of the arsenic
concentration.
It has been proven that the arsenic is included mainly the peat in upper muddy layer.
We have clarified that geology stratigraphy (Bando, K. 1998) of the Samta village consist
of most upper sand layer, upper muddy layer, upper sand layer (first aquifer), lower muddy
layer and lower sand layer
0m 0m
(second aquifer) . The water of
N
4
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 -70-60-50-40-30-20-10
7.5 600
0 800 1000 1200
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
S iO (mg/l)
pH ORP(mV) EC(S /cm) 2
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 09 0.4 0.8 1.2 200 1.6 250 300 350
2+
Fe (mg/l) +
NH4 (mg/l)
2
S O 4 (mg/l) HCO3-(mg/l)
Fig.6.. Relationship between groundwater quality and proportion of As to total As(As3+ + As5+).
3+
concentration of the village is 0.13 mgl-1, but the arsenic concentration in the eastern area
in the village (east pala) was low (average 0.04 mgl-1.) and western area (west pala) was
high (average 0.17 mgl-1.). The well depth is 72ft (22m) in east pala, and 106ft (32m) in
west pala. From the result of the geological survey, the upper muddy layer was not found in
the east pala, and the muddy layer and sand layer are overlapped multiply in west pala. As
the result, in the west pala, the well depth is much deeper, and it seems to take water from
the different aquifer.
Table 2 shows that the groundwater quality in Marua village(December, 2002). From
the result of the water analysis, the groundwater in the Marua village was almost neutrality,
and ORP showed the negative value, then the groundwater was reduced state. In
comparison with usual groundwater, EC, HCO3-, NH4+and total iron were higher. On the
other hand, NO3- and NO2- were not entirely detected. The relation between arsenic
concentration and other water quality item could not be found as in those from the Samta
village. For this reason, we think that the tubewells in Samta village are identical aquifer,
and Marua are different aquifer. Arsenic content in the boring core in Marua village was
high in muddy layer (Fig.4.b). This accorded with the results of Samta village.
5
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
6
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
From the result of water analysis and this fact, we think that the arsenic elution from the
oxidation state is difficult.
We cannot conclude the arsenic elution to groundwater by water quality in Marua village,
because the aquifer was not identical. The arsenic elution seems to have produced in the
reduced state, because the groundwater in Marua village is also in reduced state.
Table 2 Water quality analysis for the groundwater at Marua village on January 2003.
Name
of ORP EC As3+ As5+ T-As HPO43- HCO3- NH4+ Fe2+ T- Iron
Area pH
tube- (mV) (mS/cm) (mgl ) (mgl ) (mgl ) (mgl ) (mgl ) (mgl ) (mgl-1)
-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
(mgl-1)
well
58 7.2 -123 0.757 0.22 0.002 0.222 5.15 476.0 3.49 7.86 10.01
218 7.3 -114 0.591 0.08 0.02 0.10 1.30 446.7 1.26 5.52 8.94
A A-14 7.1 -133 1.52 0.02 0.03 0.05 3.41 634.6 - 15.88 19.40
A-15 7.2 -133 0.851 0.02 0.02 0.04 3.15 491.8 1.447 8.56 12.42
A-2 6.9 -70 1.04 0.001 0.00 0.001 0.10 537.0 4.52 5.83 8.68
3 7.1 -132 0.794 0.07 0.03 0.10 5.82 510.1 4.699 11.24 13.30
33 7.2 -126 0.802 0.03 0.01 0.04 4.12 546.0 2.893 9.95 11.00
B
87 7.2 -125 0.678 0.03 0.03 0.06 2.30 476.0 0.99 5.89 9.46
B-10 7.1 -132 1.14 0.16 0.05 0.21 6.23 806.7 8.298 12.64 16.43
C-6 7.1 -123 0.978 0.14 0.05 0.19 4.04 573.6 5.462 9.28 12.51
C-8 7.1 -137 0.864 0.28 0.06 0.34 4.53 768.9 3.608 7.90 14.85
140 7.1 -136 1.1 0.34 0.04 0.38 4.65 671.2 5.995 11.63 16.57
C
157 7.2 -136 0.673 0.31 0.08 0.39 4.59 482.6 1.249 9.77 12.38
251 7.1 -140 0.822 0.14 0.19 0.33 7.40 698.0 5.154 7.94 10.59
262 7.3 -103 0.462 0.08 0.05 0.12 0.94 378.3 3.925 2.61 3.61
18 7.1 -118 0.534 0.02 0.03 0.05 4.18 418.0 0.502 7.50 9.45
100 7.1 -104 0.827 0.003 0.0004 0.0034 0.77 571.0 1.592 5.11 7.29
D
132 7.1 -74 0.829 0.002 0.0003 0.0023 0.10 537.0 4.48 3.61 3.95
E-15 7.1 -122 0.789 0.002 0.001 0.003 3.94 395.0 1.603 10.21 14.94
Area A, B and C are west pala. Area D is east pala. T-As shows As + As . T-Iron shows Fe + Fe3+.
3+ 5+ 2+
4. CONCLUSIONS
The results on the arsenic elution to groundwater in Samta are summarized as follows.
The environmental condition of the groundwater in the northern part of the village is in the
oxidation state. Where the arsenic concentration is low. There is no upper muddy layer
where arsenic is contained. The iron is existed in the form of trivalent. And in the
groundwater, ferric ion becomes iron oxyhydroxide, in which the arsenic is trapped. They
have precipitated in the groundwater. As the groundwater flows from the north to the south
in the village, the upper muddy layer was thickened, and the groundwater becomes a
reduced state. In the reduced state, iron oxyhydroxide changes to iron hydroxide. Then the
arsenic is released into the groundwater which causes arsenic concentration become high in
the groundwater.
7
International Conference on Civil Engineering 2003, Malang, Indonesia
REFERENCES
Bando, K. (1998). Book of Abstracts for the 3 rd Forum on Arsenic Contamination of
Groundwater in Asia, Miyazaki, Japan,35-38pp.
British Geology Survey, DFID (2001), Arsenic contamination of groundwater in
Bangladesh, Vol1:Summary, February.
Chakraborti.D., Basu,G.K., Biswas,B.K., Chowdhury,U.K., Rahman,M.M., Paul.K,.
Chowdhury,T.R., Chanda,C.R..Lodh,D., and Ray,S.L.(2000). Proceeding of the
Forth International Conference on Arsenic, Exposure and Health Effects IV, Sam
Diego, California, 27-51pp.
Das, D., Samanta,G., Mandal, B.K., Chowdhury,T.R., Chanda, C.R., Chowdhury,P.P.,
Basu,G.K.,and Chakraborti,D. (1996). Arsenic in groundwater in six districts of West
Bengal India, Arsenic, Environmental Geochemistry and Health,18, 5-15pp.
Ishiga. H.(2002). Book of Abstracts for the 7th Forum on Arsenic Contamination of
Groundwater in Asia, Miyazaki, Japan,11-17pp.
Kosaka,A., Masuko,M., Bando,K., Yamada,M..(1999), Book of Abstracts for the 4 th Forum
on Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Asia, Matsue, Japan, 19-28pp.
Nickson,R., McArthur,J.M,. Ravenscroft,P., Burgess,W.G., and Ahmed,K.M. (2000).
Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal, Applied
Geochemistry, 15, 403-413pp.