Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NEIL GORSUCH
Allegations of plagiarism against Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch are blatantly false. This is a
scurrilous, baseless eleventh-hour attack based on cherry-picked passages from Judge Gorsuchs
dissertation and a law review article, lifted from the thousands of pages the Judge has written in
academic writing and hundreds of judicial opinions.
Each instance involves Judge Gorsuch citing original primary sources for descriptive accounts of
technical details about medical disorders, the facts of a case, laws, or events that took place in the
world. Judge Gorsuch is not misappropriating anyones ideas, theories, or creative thoughts.
Judge Gorsuchs book has been in the public domain for over 10 years and went through a rigorous
review process at two of the most preeminent Universities in the world Oxford University and
Princeton University Press. Distinguished professors from those universities have stated
that none of the allegations has any substance or justification, that the allegation
is entirely without justification.
Further, the author of a law review article that Buzzfeed alleges Gorsuch lifted from
has herself refuted the charge, writing, I have reviewed both passages and do not see
an issue here, even though the language is similar. Given that these passages both
describe the basic facts of the case, it would have been awkward and difficult for
Judge Gorsuch to have used different language.
It is sad and offensive that the judges political opponents would stoop to such baseless smears in an
effort to justify an unprecedented partisan filibuster of an eminently qualified U.S. Supreme Court
nominee.
The accusation that Gorsuch plagiarized from a 1984 Indiana Law Journal article is refuted by the
author of the supposedly plagiarized article, Abigail Lawlis Kuzma, who writes that she does not
see an issue here.
Abigail Lawlis Kuzma Is Assistant Attorney General and Chief Counsel of the new
Victim Services and Outreach Division of Indiana Attorney Generals Office
(OAG). (Indiana State Bar Association, Accessed 4/4/17)
1
For Example, In One Of The Examples Buzzfeed Cites, Judge Gorsuch Is Merely
Providing The Standard Account Of A Medical Disorder, Downs Syndrome.
In Another, Judge Gorsuch Is Merely Stating The General And Accepted Definition For
Esophageal Atresia With Tracheoesophageal Fistula.
John Finnis Was A Professor Of Law & Legal Philosophy At Oxford University, And
Since 2010, Finnis Has Been An Emeritus Professor Of Law At Oxford. He Supervised
The Oxford Doctorial Thesis That Underlies Judge Gorsuchs 2006 Book, The Future Of
Assisted Suicide And Euthanasia. (University Of Oxford Faculty Of Law, Accessed 4/4/17)
John Keown Is The Rose F. Kennedy Professor Of Christian Ethics At The Kennedy
Institute Of Ethics, Georgetown University, And Was The External Examiner For Judge
Gorsuch's Doctoral Thesis. (The Kennedy Institute Of Ethics, Accessed 4/4/17)
2
time. Its scholarship across several disciplines, not only law, is outstanding. Its
masterly analysis of arguments; the impressive marshalling of evidence; the fair hearing given to
different viewpoints; the elegant, clear style of writing, and the measured, humane tone of the
book mark it out as a truly classic volume. I have carefully examined the allegation that the
book is guilty of plagiarism. The allegation is entirely without foundation. The book
is meticulous in its citation of primary sources. The allegation that the book is guilty
of plagiarism because it does not cite secondary sources which draw on those same
primary sources is, frankly, absurd. Indeed, the books reliance on primary rather
than secondary sources is one of its many strengths.
Robert George, McCormick Professor Of Jurisprudence, Princeton University
Dr. Christian Mammen Is A Partner At San Francisco Law Firm Hogan Lovells And
Studied With Judge Gorsuch At Oxford University. (Hogan Lovells, Accessed 4/4/17)
3
William Kelley Is An Associate Professor Of Law At Notre Dame Law School. (University of
Notre Dame Law School, Accessed 4/4/17)
STATEMENT FROM PROFESSOR MACLEOD: The statements in Neil Gorsuchs book agree with
the statements of other reputable scholars because he, like they, is accurately stating facts and terms of art
that are found in primary sources. He is using the terms of art correctly. His statements are accurate. He
has cited the primary sources. And he has identified the scholarship that he consulted in his extensive
footnotes and in his bibliography. These allegations of plagiarism are ludicrous. No scholar
would take them seriously who has read and understood the book.
According To Dissertation And Research Success, You Should Cite Primary Sources
Rather Than Rely On And Cite Secondary Sources. (Timothy Delicath and Robin Buckley, Dissertation and
Research Success: Hands-on Coaching for Doctoral Success Before, During, and After Your Dissertation, 2013)