Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Questions
Review questions
19.1 Pursuant to AASB 107, the three types of activities reported on the
statement of cash flows are described as follows:
Financing activities are activities that result in changes in the size
and composition of the contributed capital and borrowings of the
entity.
Investing activities are the acquisition and disposal of long-term
assets and other investments not included in cash equivalents.
Operating activities are the principal revenue-producing activities of
the entity and other activities that are not investing or financing
activities.
Each type of cash flow provides important information. For example, it
would be hoped that in the longer term, the majority of the firms cash
flows would be generated by its operating activities. Knowledge about the
investing activities of the firm provides information about the growth or
contraction in the asset base of the company and this may be particularly
important when considering future cash flows and prospects. Cash flows
relating to financing activities will show how the financial structure has
changed and this may be particularly important in considering potential
changes in the risk of the entity, and the associated changes in expected
returns.
19.2
19.3 The objective of AASB 107 is identified in the Accounting Standard as:
The objective of this Standard is to require the provision of
information about the historical changes in cash and cash
equivalents of an entity by means of a statement of cash flows
which classifies cash flows during the period from operating,
investing and financing activities.
Cash and cash equivalents are defined in AASB 107 as follows:
Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that
are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are
subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
Paragraphs 7 and 8 of AASB 107 provide further relevant discussion:
7. Cash equivalents are held for the purpose of meeting short-term
cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes.
For an investment to qualify as a cash equivalent it must be
readily convertible to a known amount of cash and be subject to
an insignificant risk of changes in value. Therefore, an
investment normally qualifies as a cash equivalent only when it
has a short maturity of, say, three months or less from the date
of acquisition. Equity investments are excluded from cash
equivalents unless they are, in substance, cash equivalents, for
example in the case of preferred shares acquired within a short
period of their maturity and with a specified redemption date.
8. Bank borrowings are generally considered to be financing
activities. However, in some countries, bank overdrafts which are
repayable on demand form an integral part of an entitys cash
management. In these circumstances, bank overdrafts are
included as a component of cash and cash equivalents. A
characteristic of such banking arrangements is that the bank
balance often fluctuates from being positive to overdrawn.
19.4 The following are cash equivalents: (d) deposits that are available at call;
(e) deposits on the money market that are available at two months
notice; and (f) a bank overdraft.
19.5 The argument that cash-flow data might be more reliable than profit-
related data is based on the view that the determination of profits relies
upon many professional judgments, such that different teams of
accountants would rarely calculate the same profit or loss figure for the
same entity. Profit can also be manipulated. By contrast, cash and cash
equivalents are more objectively determined and less susceptible to
manipulation. However, it is debatable whether cash-flow data is more
19.6 This question will be useful for stimulating debate among students. Cash-
flow data and accounting-profit data serve different purposes. Arguably, in
assessing financial performance, accounting profits provide a superior
measure. Profit takes into account the inflows and outflows of economic
benefits. Cash flows only consider inflows and outflows of cash and cash
equivalents. The flow of cash does not necessarily equate to inflow of net
assets to an entity. For example, we may sell land for cash at a price equal
to its carrying amount. Although there is an inflow of cash, the net assets
of the entity would remain unchanged. Nevertheless, for determining the
solvency and cash management of a reporting entity a statement of cash
flows, and its supporting notes, is a useful complement to the statement
of comprehensive income and statement of financial position.
It may be difficult to extract non-cash flows/non-operating flows from the movements in the account
balances. For example, a payment received from a debtor may relate to the proceeds from the sale of a
non-current asset which does not relate to operating activities.
financing activities
AASB 107 requires that cash flows be appropriately classified. It will not always be clear which category a
cash flow belongs in.
The statement of cash flows shows the difference between cash flows
and profits for the entity and this information can be useful in
evaluating the solvency of the business.
Information about past cash flows may be useful in forming
predictions about future cash flows. This would be of value when
determining the value of the entity as a going concern.
Cash flow information may serve to summarise managements
investment and financing policies more clearly than statement of
financial position information.
A problem that may arise is that the statement of cash flows is
inconsistent with the accrual basis of accounting used in the
statement of comprehensive income and statement of financial
position. This may lead to confusion for people without accounting
backgrounds. There is, however, a note which reconciles net profit
with cash flows from operations.
Finally, it is debatable whether cash flows from operations, which is
often used as a measure of managerial performance, provides a
better benchmark than profit, or say funds from operations. Some
argue that the application of the accrual concept, and consideration
of revenues earned and expenses incurred, is required for this
purpose. How many management performance measures rely on
cash flows rather than conventional accounting measures?
Thus, whilst statements of cash flows are useful for reviewing the cash
position of reporting entities, they must be reviewed carefully and in
conjunction with other financial information.
The proceeds from the sale of a non-current asset would be disclosed as part of the
cash flows associated with investing activities. It is the cash flow which is relevant to
the statement of cash flows, not the gain or loss on sale as would be included in the
statement of comprehensive income. In the reconciliation of profit after tax with net
cash provided from operations, any gain on sale would need to be deducted from net
profits (and any loss on sale added).
19.9 The Accounting Standard requires that the following be disclosed (by way
of a note):
(i) information about transactions and other events that do not result
in any cash flows during the financial year but affect assets and
liabilities that are recognised, where the transactions or other
events involve parties external to the entity and relate to the
financing or investing activities of the entity. Specifically, paragraph
43 states:
Investing and financing transactions that do not require the
use of cash or cash equivalents shall be excluded from a
statement of cash flows. Such transactions shall be disclosed
elsewhere in the financial statements in a way that provides all
the relevant information about these investing and financing
activities.
(ii) the policy adopted for determining which items are classified as
cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows.
Specifically, paragraph 46 of AASB 107 states:
In view of the variety of cash management practices and
banking arrangements around the world and in order to
comply with AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements,
an entity discloses the policy which it adopts in determining
the composition of cash and cash equivalents.
(iii) a reconciliation of the amount of cash at the end of the financial
year to the related items in the statement of financial position.
Specifically, paragraph 45 of AASB 107 states:
An entity shall disclose the components of cash and cash
equivalents and shall present a reconciliation of the
amounts in its statement of cash flows with the equivalent
items reported in the statement of financial position.
(iv) a summary of the used and unused loan facilities of the entity and
the extent to which these can be continued or extended.
Specifically, paragraph 50 of AASB 107 states:
Additional information may be relevant to users in
understanding the financial position and liquidity of an
entity. Disclosure of this information, together with a
commentary by management, is encouraged and may
include:
(a) the amount of undrawn borrowing facilities that may
be available for future operating activities and to settle
capital commitments, indicating any restrictions on the
use of these facilities.
(v) the amount of cash held that is not available for use and the nature
of the restrictions placed upon the use of the cash. Specifically,
paragraph 48 of AASB 107 states:
An entity shall disclose, together with a commentary by
management, the amount of significant cash and cash
equivalent balances held by the entity that are not
available for use by the group.
(vi) a reconciliation of cash flows arising from operating activities to
profit or loss.
19.10 (a) The main criticism is that the definition of cash and cash
equivalents is too narrow and should include bullion holdings.
(b) and (c) Cash and cash equivalents are defined in AASB 107 as follows:
Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments
that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and
which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
To the extent that gold bullion is readily convertible to cash, then the criticism may be valid. However, it is
not clear from a reading of AASB 107 that gold bullion would definitely have to be excluded from cash
equivalents. The entity, however, would need to be able to demonstrate that gold bullion is highly liquid,
and is used in the entitys cash management function on a day-to-day basis.
19.11 This question can be answered by using either the t-account approach or
the equations approach.
The following t-accounts are in $000
Sales
Accounts receivable
Accounts 400 Op. balance 90 Allowance 6
receivabl for doubtful
e debts
Sales 400 Discounts 10
Cash 39
4
Closing 80
balance
400 490 49
0
19.12 This question can be answered by using either the t-account approach or
the equations approach.
The following t-accounts are in $000
Accounts payable
Inventory
Disc. rev. 2 Op. bal. 40 Op. balance 10 COGS 60
Cash 83 Inventory 80 Accounts 80 Stock w/offs 5
payable
Closing 35 Closing 25
balance balance
120 120 90 90
19.13 This question can be answered by using either the t-account approach or
the equations approach.
The following t-accounts are in $000
The original cost of the asset that was disposed is determined by adding
the accumulated depreciation pertaining to the asset ($40 000, as
determined above) to the carrying amount of the disposed asset ($90 000,
which was provided in the question) to give an original cost of $130 000.
Because a gain of $20 000 was made on disposal of property, plant and
equipment, $110 000 must have been received for the disposed asset
($90 000 + $20 000).
If we adopt an equation method approach, cash payments to suppliers of
the property, plant and equipment would be determined as:
Cash payments = Closing balance of plant (650 000) opening balance of
plant (500 000) + original cost of asset sold (130 000) = 280 000
Accounts receivable
Allowance for doubtful
debts
Op. balance 250 Allow. 30 A/c rec. 30 Op. 35
for d.d. balance
Sales 250 Cash 200
XYZ Ltd commenced the period with $160 000 of inventory. After
using $130 000 (COGS) it had a closing balance of $180 000. Given
that there were no inventory write-offs, this means that $150 000 of
inventory must have been purchased.
Given that accounts payable had an opening balance of $190 000,
there were purchases of $150 000 (above), and there was a closing
balance of $200 000, $140 000 must have been paid in cash. This is
shown in the following t-accounts.
Inventory
Accounts payable
Op. bal. 160 COGS 130 Cash 140 Op. 190
bal.
Accounts 150 Clos. 180 Clos. 200 Inv. 150
payable bal. bal.
310 310 340 340
Accrued salaries
Cash 26 Op. bal. 18
Clos. bal. 22 Salaries 30
48 48
At this stage we can now determine the total cash flows from operations as:
The journal entries for the disposal of the plant and equipment can
be summarised as:
Dr Accum. depreciationplant and 20 000
equip.
Cr Plant and equipment 20 000
As plant increased by $10 000, $30 000 must have been acquired during the period (this is given in the
question), as reconciled below:
Accumulated depreciation
Property, plant and
equipment
Disposal 20 Op. bal. 30 Op. bal. 90 Disposa 20
l
Clos. bal. 20 Deprec. exp 10 Cash 30 Clos. 100
bal.
40 40 120 120
We are now able to present a statement of cash flows for XYZ Ltd.
XYZ Limited
$000
Net profit 35
Depreciation 10
Decrease in allowance for doubtful debts (5)
Increase in accounts receivable (20)
Increase in inventories (20)
Increase in accounts payable 10
Increase in accrued expenses 4
$000 $00
0
19.15 S Limited
$000 $000
profit
$000
Workings:
Accounts receivable
The entry to record sales would be:
Dr Accounts receivable 2 124
000
Cr Sales 2 124 000
Accounts receivable
Opening balance at 1 July 2015 528 000
Write-off against accounts receivable (above) (72 000)
Sales 2 124 000
Cash received (1 908
000)
Closing balance at 30 June 2016 672 000
S Ltd commenced the year with $216 000 of inventory. After using
$576 000 of this inventory (cost of sales) it had a closing inventory
balance of $240 000. This means that $600 000 must have been
purchased.
Inventory account
Opening balance at 1 July 2015 216 000
Cost of sales (576 000)
Purchases 600 000
Closing balance at 30 June 2016 240 000
Accounts payable
(iv) Taxation
The profit before tax using accounting rules was $472 000. The taxable income for the year (that is, the
profit that is calculated using taxation rules) is calculated after adding back to accounting profit the building
depreciation of $48 000 (which is not tax deductible in 2016 or any other yearit is a permanent
difference). In determining taxable income we also have to add back the doubtful debts expense and then
subtract the actual doubtful debts write-off against accounts receivable (for tax purposes only the write-off
against accounts receivable is deductible and not the actual doubtful debt expense). Hence we are adding
back $96 000 and subtracting $72 000 (that is, adding back a net amount of $24 000 which is the increase
in the allowance). Taxable income therefore is:
There is a temporary difference caused due to the allowance for doubtful debts and this temporary
difference creates a deferred tax asset. Using a tax rate of 40%, the accounting entries to account for tax
pursuant to AASB 112 (see Chapter 18) and to the nearest $000 are:
000)
Closing balance 218 000
Dr Cash 72 000
Dr Accumulated depreciation 168 000
Cr Plant and equipment 240 000
As plant and equipment increased by $48 000, despite the disposal above, $288 000 must have been
acquired in the year. There was no gain or loss on sale as the sale proceeds of $72 000 equalled the
carrying amount.
Accumulated depreciation
Opening balance at 1 July 2015 96 000
Depreciation expense for the year 168 000
Disposal (168
000)
Closing balance at 30 June 2016 96 000
Challenging question:
19.16 T Pty Limited
$000
Purchases of inventory
T Pty Ltd commenced the period with $2 486 000 of inventory. After using
$28 205 000 (COGS), writing-off $50 000, and exchanging $80 000 for
some investments, it had a closing balance of $2 774 000. This means
that $28 623 000 of inventory must have been purchased.
Given that accounts payable had an opening balance of $1 483 000, there
were purchases of $28 623 000 (above), and there was a closing balance
of $1 637 0000, $28 469 000 must have been paid in cash. This is shown
in the following t-accounts.
Accrued expenses
1 710 1 710
If the opening balance of the provision is $298 000, salary and wages
expenses totalled $1 324 000, and the closing balance was $205 000, then
$1 417 000, must have been paid.
Provision for employee entitlements
Cash 1 417 Op. bal. 298
Clos. bal. 205 Salaries 1 324
1 622 1 622
It has been assumed that finance charges of $7000 were paid as incurred.
It is not clear what the prepayments relate to, but it will be assumed that
they relate to some employee salaries.
Payments relating to taxation can be determined as:
At this stage we can now determine the total cash flows from operations
as:
Receipts from customers 31 056
Payments to suppliers (28 469)*
Payments for accrued expenses (135)*
Employee-related payments (1417)*
Prepayments (115)*
Finance charges (7)
Dividends 51**
Solutions Manual t/a Australian Financial Accounting 7/e by Craig Deegan 22
Answers to Review
Questions
There was also a revaluation of plant and equipment. The entries to record
the revaluation, together with its tax effects, would be:
Dr Accumulated depreciationplant and 500
equipment
Cr Plant and equipment 500
Dr Plant and equipment 800
Cr Revaluation surplus 800
Dr Revaluation surplus 240
Cr Deferred tax liability 240
In relation to the land we are told that land is devalued against a previous
revaluation increment. The original entry back when the land was revalued
would have been a debit to land and a credit to revaluation surplus of
$250 000. There would also be an entry to recognise the tax effect of the
revaluation. With a tax rate of 30 per cent this would have required a debit
to revaluation surplus of $75 000 and a credit to deferred tax liability. To
reverse this previous revaluation increment the following entry would be
required:
Dr Revaluation surplus 250
Cr Land 250
Dr Deferred tax liability 75
Cr Revaluation surplus 75
The balance in revaluation surplus and deferred tax liability can now be
reconciled as follows:
No plant and equipment was acquired for cash. There were some
acquisitions of investments during the period. Acquisition of investments
would be recorded as follows:
Dr Investment in associate 1 050
Cr Cash 250
Cr Provision for deferred payment 50
Cr Paid-up capital 750
The account investments increased from $948 000 to $1 216 000. This
increase is partly explained by the acquisition financed by the $80 000 of
tennis equipment (see Additional information part (i)). The balance of the
increase ($188) is assumed to have been acquired for cash. This gives
total cash acquisition of investments of $438 000.
Cash flows from investing were:
Proceeds from sale of property plant and equipment 20 000
Payment for investments (438 000)
(418 000)