Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gomez-Marquez
q
PowerPoint Sampler
The Fixed
Fixed-Income
Income
Opportunity
Adding diversification
to your clients’ portfolios
Lipper averages are averages of the performance of all Beats about 3/4 of Lipper
mutual funds within their respective investment peers for the 3-, 5-, and 10-
categories. The number of funds in each category year periods ended 6/30/04
FA Government Investment Fund Class T Lipper
periodically changes. Rankings are based on total returns ranking as of 6/30/04: #105 out of 185, #37 out of
for the periods shown and do not reflect the effects of the 157 #35 out of 137
157, 137, and #22 out of 76 in Lipper
General U.S. Government Funds Objective
fund’s sales load but include reinvestment of dividends category for 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year
and capital gains, if any. periods, respectively.
Why
y High
g Yield Bonds Are Attractive
Merrill Lynch
y U.S. High
g Yield Master II Index
Annual Performance & Yield Spread over 10-Year Treasury
45%
ML High Y
1198
40% 39.17%
981.5
98 5
998
25%
772 0
772.0
20.46%
20% 17.44% 16.69% 586.8
674.6 598
15% 13.27%
11.27% 526.0
10% 492 8
492.8 468 4
468.4
398
Cu
403.6 433.7
5% 4.48%
350.1 331.5 2.95% 2.51%
327.7
0% 198
-1.03% -1.89%
1.89%
-5%
5% -4.36% -5.12%
-10% -2
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Year
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not intended to represent the performance of any Fidelity Advisor
fund. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
2006 Q3
Backlog
reaches
$85.3
Growth Story
CareSuite ED
$59.7mm
$59 7mm version 3.6
released
Revenue
OR/ICU version
7.5 released
2005
1,000th
2004 customer
Acquired Ibex
2003 Emergency
e ge cy 89 CareSuite
First to Department sites go live
2002 introduce IT solution
Acquired “Total
Medical Perioperative
Systems Automation”
Management
g
2001
$3.9mm
Revenue 2005
98% CAGR
5 Picis Company Confidential
U.S. High Acuity IT Market
Annual Market ($bn)
Macro Trends Drive for ED, OR and ICU Solutions
Demand for High-Acuity IT
Solutions
Aging Population
Shortage of high-acuity
caregivers
Patient safety at
increased risk
$5.8 BN addressable
market
<20% penetrated
Backlog Revenue
B kl
Backlog R
Revenue
’03 – ’05 ’03 – ’05
CAGR: 69% CAGR: 69%
’03 – ’05
CAGR: 69%
’03 – ’05
CAGR: 69%
Ambulatory Inpatient
High Barriers to Entry
A4 Wellsoft
(ED) (ED) Medhost
Picis
Clinical
(ED)
Cerner SIS
Entry
Epic (OR)
us
Eclipsys
oduct Focu
Barriers to E
IMDSoft
GE/IDX (ICU)
Pro
High B
Administrative
Siemens
McKesson
Meditech
David S
S. Evans
Founder/Market Platform Dynamics
THE LYDIAN
ROUNDTABLE
The Current State
The payment industry is passing through an
inflection point
NEW BUSINESS
MODELS
OLD BUSINESS
MODELS RISKS
OPPORTUNITIES
January 2007
US Senate holds
September
p hearings on credit
TSYS announces November card practices
relationship with Discover to be
Toyota Finance/Nikko accepted in China
Cordial Securities through its alliance
April
p with CUP
Visa announces a
small ticket payment
strategy for purchases
under $25 June 30 February
Bank of America MC’s stock at
Merchant
M h t plaintiffs
l i tiff i
issues fi
firstt credit
dit $118 – more thanth
amend lawsuit to card with AmEx triple its IPO price
include signature
debit cards
December
Discover spin off plan
October announced
WU trades on NYSE
July
MC Paypass Visa announces
launches in Europe restructuring plan and
May 25 2006 FDIC imposes IPO
MC goes public moratorium on ILC
on NYSE applications
IMPLICATIONS GEOGRAPHIC
ASIAN EMERGING
MARKETS EUROPE UNITED STATES
SEPA will slowly
create
Rapid uptake of opportunities for Slower growing
payment “cards” cross-border and complicated
in China, India, acquiring and credit card
etc. processing market
16
>< The Balancing Act SECTION I
Corporate Events
Comm
Product
Campaigns
Launches
Channel IR& PR
Comm
Web Customer
Marketing Programs
17
><
Measurable Insight Drives Business
Action SECTION I
18
Confidential
Benefits of Innovation
Closes Growth Gap
Innovation helps companies close their “growth gap”
Revenue or Stretch
Earnings Target
900 Innovation
($MM) Shareholder Target
Expectation
800
700
Projected
P j t d
Revenue
600
500
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Owner and
Shareholder
Premiums
The Preferred The Brand
Partner to Have to Buy
y
Customers and
Partnership and Business
End User
Supplier
pp Premiums Innovation
Premium
Employee
Premiums
The Emerging
Growth Gap Closing the Growth Gap
Heightened and Building Confidence
Investor and Board for the Longer Term
Earnings Grrowth
Earnings Grrowth
Earnings
??
E
Expectations
t ti
$$$$
$$
$
$$$$
Type of
Metrics
In-Process Lagging Leading
Examples z Timeliness of project z Revenue / turnover z Quality of Ideas
z Performance on target z Profit margin z Number of Ideas
z Project cost on target z Market Share z Number of customer applications
z Etc. z Royalties z Market / product / technology
z Applicability across SBUs vision
z Number of new patents z Staff motivation
z Coverage of strategic goals
z Backlog
Drug
D D
Deployment
l tTTech
h
Common R&D platform and support EPA and FDA Drug strategy
regulatory strategy implemented/ready
defense for market
Alpha Phase
Pharma
Technical
Services
Biohazard
Delivery preemption Launch $$$$
Services
Biotech
Client
Centered
Alternative uses
rolled out
23
CAS-COD-Prez-Date-CTL
Gen X and Y
Something Special or More
of the Same?
David S.
S Evans
© 2006 First Data Corporation. All Rights Reserved. This document contains unpublished, confidential and proprietary information of First Data Corporation.
You may not disclose, copy or use any part of these materials for any purpose without the express written consent of First Data Corporation.
25
The Gen X and Y Context:
Payment Industry 1990-
1990-2000 2004
PIN debit volume increases Number of debit
from %7.1B to $317.8B transactions
exceeds number
on credit cards
1966 1970 1989 1995
16% 56% 67%
2000
109.5M
1990 1997
5.3M 19%
4.5 1976
People Born
1981
(Millions
4.0
67%
3.5
55%
P
3.0
64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97 00 03
27
Much Ado About Nothing Perhaps?
Mobile
75 SMS
Biometric
50
25
0
Too Expensive Not Secure Don’t want to Unnecessary I don’t have a cell I don’t trust it to
Enough touch phone work properly
2000
2005
2010 30
© 2007 Market Platform Dynamics
Creating A Framework for Catalysts
Compete
Identify
y the Establish a Design
g the Focus on Strategically Experiment
Platform Pricing Catalyst for Profitability With Other and Evolve
Community Structure Success Catalysts
Identify distinct Set separate prices Attract multiple Study industry Understand the Know when to be
groups who need for access and customer groups history dynamics of first – and when to
each other usage that need each catalyst follow
other Use forecasts to competition
Determine why and Set prices to enhance Control growth
how much they balance demand Promote profitability Look for
need each other from the two sides interactions competition from Protect your back
Anticipate different business
Evaluate who else Price to grow Minimize competitor actions models Plan for what’s
is serving the slowly – at first transaction costs next
community Align interests Leverage to attack
Pay customers to Design for internally and Look out for the
Compare multi- belong – sometimes evolution externally Consider cops
sided business cooperation
model with a g
Price for long-term
single-sided one profits
Draw Challenge
Find Out Shape Visualize Existing Pursue
Participation
p Customers & Path Toward Evolutionary
y
Who Needs Catalysts and
& Maximize F ilit t
Facilitate Long-Term React to New Strategy for
Whom—and
Profits Interactions Profit Catalyst Growth
Why
© 2007 Market Platform Dynamics Threats 31
The Worldwide Presence of INVESCO
In This Issue . . . Page #
AMVESCAP PLC
$319 Billion International
te at o a Equity
qu ty Update 2
INVESCO—The All-Weather Manager 3
INVESCO Atlantic Trust Private
INVESCO*
Retirement†
AIM
Wealth Management Why International? 4
$174 Billion $137 Billion
[$23 Billion] $8 Billion Why International Value? 5
Whyy INVESCO International? 6
Good Value in Europe 7
Americas Europe Pacific
Japan Stays Afloat 8
Atlanta Montreal Amsterdam Madrid Hong Kong Sydney
Consistency of Characteristics 9
Baltimore New York Brussels Milan Melbourne Taipei
Boston Palm Beach Dublin Paris Singapore Tokyo
Partial World Client List
Buenos Aires Palo Alto Frankfurt Vienna BellSouth Corporation
Calgary Portland Henley Warsaw CITGO Petroleum Corporation
The Coca-Cola Company
Dallas San Francisco Jersey Zurich Dow Chemical Canada
Denver San Juan London Ford Motor Company
National Geographic Society
Louisville Toronto BMW
Miami Vancouver Caterpillar UK
DaimlerChrysler
Washington, D.C. IBM Germany
Aichi Prefecture Truck Business Pension Fund
DuPont China Limited
Fukoku Life Insurance
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology
Pfizer Pharmaceutical (Japan) Pension Fund
SANYO Electric Pension Fund
Tokyo Printers Industries Pension Fund
Global sector fundamental research Rank stocks based on best relative valuation
24 1.3
12 Mo EPS
Value & Price
0 -0.1
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
4Q02_Global_Perspectives.ppt 1812-O-4/03
33
INVESCO Managed Accounts
Screenshow
4Q01_overview 34
INVESCO Managed Accounts
p Style
Multiple y Accounts Presentations Client Specific
p Piece
4Q01_overview 35
Antitrust Analysis
y for Multi-Sided
Platform Industries
David S. Evans*
Antitrust of Two-Sided
Two Sided Industries
MIT
June 23, 2006
News
TV shows
Coincident One-sided Intersecting
Evening The
FT Billboard ITV
Standard Times
Advertising X X X X
News X X X X
TV Shows X
>>>Page 37
© 2006 eSapience, Ltd
Putnam
P t
Asset Allocation
Funds
J ff
Jeffrey L
L. Knight,
K i ht CFA
Managing Director
Chief
C e Investment
es e O Officer
ce
Global Asset Allocation Team
Putnam Investments
235990_GAA
Philosophy Consistent
C i t t
performer
$215,892
¾ Volatility can diminish returns Average
g of yearly
y y
returns = 8.0%
STEADY WINS THE RACE
+23%
Volatile performer
+28% $189,726
$100,000 –5%
+18%
initial Average of yearly
investment returns = 8.0%
–8%
+0% –2%
+8%
+38%
–20%
235990_GAA
Process
¾ Address distinct investment goals
CONSERVATIVE PORTFOLIO: BALANCED PORTFOLIO: GROWTH PORTFOLIO:
CAPITAL PRESERVATION MANAGEABLE VOLATILITY EQUITY-LIKE RETURNS
235990_GAA
Large Cap Value Equity
professionals
¾ David L.
L King,
King CFA,
CFA is the lead Global Equity
Research
portfolio manager Analysts
Global
Quantitative
22-year Putnam veteran Equity
Economic
Research
L d manager on th
Lead the strategy
t t A l t
Analysts Team
since inception
¾ Michael J. Abata, CFA, is the LARGE CAP VALUE
Risk Q
EQUITY TEAM Other Equity
q y
portfolio co
co-manager
manager Management David L. King, CFA Portfolio
Team Managers
Michael J. Abata,CFA
Member of the team Nancy A. Ward
since 2000
Global
Provides quantitative research Global Asset
on security selection and risk Trading Team Allocation
Dedicated Team
analysis Equity
Research
¾ Supported by Putnam
Putnam’s
s A l t
Analysts
Large-Cap Value team
9 Large-Cap Value portfolio managers
236141_LCV_Q206
Asset diversification is the key to
l
long-term
t success
ASSETS AS OF JUNE 2006 (%)
$6 6TR $851B $842B $767B $265B $200B $190B $171B $135B $113B
$6.6TR $97B
100%
Unclassified
80% Tax Free FI
Taxable FI
60%
Int'l/Global
40% Growth
an
e
O
er
lin
rd
am
ox
ba
lit
ic
C
im
ua
ic
nk
us
C
de
Pr
lo
tn
M
er
he
ng
&
G
PI
ra
d
Pu
Fi
e
m
In
ge
w
F
en
s
Va
A
ay
Ro
od
pp
cl
T.
D
O
ar
B
Note: Asset mix is based on long-term open-end mutual fund assets that are tracked by Strategic Insight. Barclays’ assets are primarily registered
exchange-traded funds.
Source: Strategic Insight Simfund, 2006.
237398_Coveney
Putnam
Investors
Fund
James C
C. Wiess
Wiess, CFA
Managing Director
Chief Investment Officer
US C
U.S. Core E
Equity
it T
Team
Putnam Investments
236001_investors
We take advantage g of market
inefficiencies to make money
on the “tails”
tails
Market underestimates
long-term growth rate and
franchise power of the company
• Apple Computer
• UnitedHealth Group
• Whole Foods Market
• H l D id
Harley-Davidson
236001_investors
+
+
=
+
This is not a recommendation to buy or sell an individual security. Portfolio holdings will vary over time. As of 6/30/06, General Electric, Citigroup, Whirlpool,
Caterpillar, and Teva Pharmaceuticals make up 0.00%, 3.49%, 0.69%, 1.40%, and 0.48% of Putnam Investors Fund, respectively.
236001_investors
Default rates are low
LAGGING TWELVE-MONTH INSTITUTIONAL LOAN DEFAULT RATE BY NUMBER OF ISSUERS
VERSUS ESTIMATE MODEL FORECAST
(%) 10
Actual Model forecast
8
0
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
9
7F
06
9
0
-
-
n-
n-
n-
n-
n-
n-
n-
n-
0
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
ec
n-
ec
Ju
Ju
Ju
Ju
Ju
Ju
Ju
Ju
D
Ju
D
Default rate is calculated as the number of defaults over the past twelve months divided by the number of issuers in the index at the beginning of the
twelve-month period.
Source: Standard & Poor’s, 2006.
236335_Floating_Rate
Strong investment performance
ANNUALIZED RETURNS AND LIPPER RANKINGS FOR CLASS A SHARES AT NAV
1 year 3 years 5 years 10 years
6/30/05–6/30/06 6/30/03–6/30/06 6/30/01–6/30/06 6/30/96–6/30/06
Fund Name Total Lipper Total Lipper Total Lipper Total Lipper
(Lipper Category) Return Rank Return Rank Return Rank Return Rank
Putnam American Government Income Fund 4,7 42% 0.68% 63% 3.53% 60% 4.95% 55%
-1.49%
(G
(General lUU.S.
S governmentt ffunds)
d ) (75/178) (98/157) (77/129) (43/78)
Putnam Diversified Income Trust1,2,3,4,7 1.97 46% 6.55 24% 8.12 32% 5.67 65%
(Multi-sector income funds) (56/122) (23/97) (27/85) (33/50)
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund 4.81 61% — — — — — —
(Loan participation funds) (28/45)
Putnam Global Income Trust1,2,3,4,5,7 -0.28 61% 4.29 36% 7.86 25% 4.46 73%
(Global income funds) (64/104) (34/95) (20/80) (37/50)
Putnam High Yield Advantage Fund3 6.55 13% 9.45 15% 8.84 20% 5.16 54%
(High current yield funds) (55/444) (57/395) (62/313) (61/114)
Putnam High Yield Trust3 4.98 42% 8.88 22% 8.49 27% 5.48 47%
(High current yield funds) (186/444) (86/395) (83/313) (53/114)
Putnam Income Fund3,4,7 -1.18 44% 1.98 38% 4.45 59% 5.01 84%
(Corporate debt A rated funds) (76/173) (56/149) (65/111) (54/64)
Putnam Limited Duration Government Income Fund4,7 -0.69 77% 0.53 70% 3.01 64% 4.64 58%
(Short-intermediate U.S. government funds) (60/77) (49/70) (41/64) (28/48)
Putnam U.S. Government Income Trust4,7 -0.27 56% 1.96 39% 3.66 58% 5.18 60%
(GNMA funds) (35/62) (24/62) (32/55) (19/31)
Putnam Money Market Fund6 3.85 12% 2.06 14% 1.89 15% 3.59 16%
(Money market funds) (41/359) (45/339) (45/301) (29/190)
S
Source: Li
Lipper. Li
Lipper ranks
k ffunds
d ((without
ith t sales
l charges)
h )b
based d on ttotal
t l return
t relative
l ti tto ffunds
d with
ith similar
i il currentt iinvestment
t t styles
t l or objectives
bj ti as
determined by Lipper. Data is historical. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. More recent returns may be higher or lower than those
shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance assumes
reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Returns are shown at NAV and do not reflect the current maximum initial sales charge of
3.75% for income funds, with the exception of Putnam Limited Duration Government Income Fund, and the Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund, which is
3.25%. Some funds may have negative
returns for the five-year period. Also, some funds may have limited expenses without which returns would be lower. For the most recent month-end
performance, visit www.putnam.com. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks including interest rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk.
As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long
Long-term
term bonds are more exposed to interest rate risk than short-term
short term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds
have ongoing fees and expenses.
1 International investing involves certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, economic instability, and political developments. 2 Additional risks may be
associated with emerging-market securities, including illiquidity and volatility. 3 Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. 4 Mutual
funds that invest in government securities are not guaranteed. Mortgage-backed securities are subject to prepayment risk. 5 The fund invests in fewer
issuers or concentrates its investments by region or sector, and involves more risk than a fund that invests more broadly. 6 Money market funds are not
insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other governmental agency. Although the fund seeks to maintain a
constant share price of $1.00, it is possible to lose money by investing in this fund. The fund’s current 7-day yield is 4.77% as of 6/30/06.
7 The use of derivatives involves special risks and may result in losses.
236335_Floating_Rate