Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contemporary Cognitive
Behavioral Theory
May 8, y
Introduction
The objective of this paper is to investigate the theory of contemporary cognitive
behavior in order to garner and articulate a greater understanding of why veteran suicides spiked
from 2008-2012. Furthermore to discuss evidence based treatment modalities that have
demonstrated broad efficacy towards reducing suicide rates. It is the hope of this work that the
social paradigm of exalting victimhood may be enlightened through the emergence of the
presented data such that greater emphasis may be invested in the prevention of veteran suicide
through greater understanding of the actual root causes rather than perceived triggers.
2
Background
Despite continuous war on two fronts following the terrorist attacks in America on
September 11th, 2001 and between the years of 2001-2007 the US Armed Forces veteran suicide
rate had been on the decline. In fact, the veteran suicide rate had not began to spike until 2008 as
detailed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in 2012 which disclosed a daily veteran
The 2012 VA publication led to a national multi-billion dollar investment into suicide
prevention programs, research and the implementation of evidenced based treatment for mental
health disorders such as Post Traumatic Stress (PTSD) , Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and others
thought to be the primary culprits of the rising rate of veteran suicide (Thompson, 2016). Since
then we have seen veteran suicide rates begin to drop amongst veterans utilizing VA mental
However, we have also garnered much more data about veteran suicides. Specifically, the
population groups that had higher rates, key risks and precipitating factors of suicides (Bush,
Reger, Luxton, Skopp, Kinn, Smolenski, & Gahm, 2013; Friedman, 2015; JAMA, 2014; Kang,
Bullman, Smolenski, Skopp, Gahm & Reger, 2014; Leardmann, Powell, Smith, Smith, Boyko,
& Hoge, 2013; Reger, Smolenski, Skopp, Metzger-Abamukang, Kang, Bullman, Perdue, &
Gahm, 2015; Thompson, 2016; VA, 2016). Many of which have yet to be considered by
The current paradigm of social thought surrounding veteran suicide continues to place
combat and repeated deployments as crucial precipitating risk factors. While this observation
may be accurate for anticipating symptomatic development of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), the data to date actually negatively correlates
3
deployments and combat with suicide outcomes (Leardmann, Powell, Smith, Smith, Boyko, &
Hoge, 2013; Reger, Smolenski, Skopp, Metzger-Abamukang, Kang, Bullman, Perdue, & Gahm,
In fact, those most likely to commit suicide had either attempted it prior to joining the
armed forces (Freidman, 2015), had not served out their full four year term, did not go to college,
or did not attain an honorable discharge (Reger, Smolenski, Skopp, Metzger-Abamukang, Kang,
Bullman, Perdue, & Gahm, 2015). Moreover, seventy-percent of Veteran suicides were carried
out by those that had never used VA services (Kemp & Bossarte, 2012).
Furthermore, the data cited in the above studies also suggest a stronger correlation
between PTSD and Post Traumatic Growth (PTG) than with suicide. Interesting to note, that
while fifteen to twenty percent of combat veterans develop symptoms of PTSD (Kemp &
Bossarte, 2012), an astounding seventy-five to eighty-five percent do not. Further, many combat
veterans with PTSD symptoms actually go on to thrive either as civilians or in the continued
service of their nation. Ironically, this relationship between PTSD and PTG is not a new
phenomenon, but rather one that is well studied (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004; Pietrzak, Goldstein,
Malley et al. 2010; Lowe, Manove & Rhodes, 2013), and explained in greater detail herein.
The convergence of these studies and their respective data sets (n >60,000,000) offers an
opportunity to better understand the above phenomenon through the prism of contemporary
cognitive behavioral theory. Since the recent study data demonstrates greater resilience amongst
combat veterans than their non-deployed counterparts we can begin to look at the issue of
veteran suicide from an angle that has not been previously charted.
4
With the technology of today, what was once only hypothesized can now be observed and
replicated. Such is the case with the evolution of contemporary cognitive behavioral theory. The
gradual historical shift from behaviorally dominated clinical psychology towards the
incorporation of cognition was, at first, met with skepticism due to the inability apply proper
scientific method. Earlier referred to as covert behaviors (Bandura, 1969; Mischel, 1973), and
today being a broadly accepted theory which incorporates emphasis on how individuals
cognitively structure their experiences and the resultant impact such structuring has on their
behavioral outcome (Ingram, Kendall & Chen, 1991). Research has conceptualized the
place. Interestingly, modern research continues to support this paradigm with growing studies
demonstrating the actual processes that occur within the various physical structures of our brains.
How this applies to veteran suicide is newly unfolding. First, we can now investigate why
those that never saw combat, never deployed, did not earn an honorable discharge and did not go
to college end up in the highest risk factor for committing suicide. Secondly we can delve deeper
into the biopsychosocial factors that may have led to the premature discharge status of the
suicidal veteran. Thirdly is in understanding how access to mezzo and macro resources is
impacted by a less than honorable discharge. Finally, how the combination of factors creates the
perfect storm of conditions precedent for suicidal ideation. In order to tie these together, we must
Neurobiology
Today we can peer into the brain, measure the volume and activity actively taking place
within various structures, and predict, with reliability, what the behavioral outcomes will be
5
(Cozolino, 2010; Applegate & Shapiro, 2005; Badenoch, 2008). More importantly for mental
health practitioners, we have learned how to utilize cognitive behavioral modalities to alter
maladaptive or distorted cognitions through a wide range of various techniques that will be
covered herein. Thus, cognitive behavioral theory now finds itself at the nexus of modern
neurobiological research.
Observed as the actual branching out and expanding of neural structures within
various association areas of our brain, particularly within the regions of the brain associated with
ongoing learning (amygdala, frontal cortex, and hippocampus) (Eriksson, Perfileva, Bjork-
Eriksson et al., 1998; Gould, Reeves, Graziano, & Gross, 1999; Gross, 2000; Cozolino, 2010;
Gould, Tanapat, Hastings & Shors, 1999) and new experiences (Purves & Voyvodic, 1987). This
active process of neural branching and expanding is demonstrative of the power of our mind to
heal itself through the reprograming of our cognitions via new associations at the
Neural networks. Perform functions allowing us to learn, remember, act and adapt to
Instantiation. Represents the symbiotic interconnects of our neural coding. Whereby our
abilities, emotions and patterns of behavior are encoded and shaped through our individual
modalities focus on recreating new associations to previous experiences such that maladaptive
cognitions from trauma and hardships may be altered thus resulting in more healthy outcomes
Arborization. Is a process of neural pruning whereby unused neural networks die and
make room for the growth and development, referred to as long-term potentiation (LTP), of
neural networks being used thus enabling them to grow in size throughout the lifecycle
(Cozolino, 2010).
Association areas. Areas within the cortex of the brain which serve to bridge and direct
coordinating circuits to give us the ability to recall feeling, emotion, language, smell and taste
Are used in helping us process cortisol, a stress hormone which enables us to endure brief
periods of stress, restore homeostasis, mobilize energy, enhance memory and build up our future
resiliency to stress (Cozolina, 2010; Badenoch, 2008; Applegate & Shapiro, 2005)
The implications of GRs and behavioral outcomes are well studied. Normal and
sustainable doses actually enhance our capacity to endure stress and tend to result in greater
resilience throughout the lifecycle impacting our cognitive processing, affect regulation, general
brain development, which adversely impact tolerance to stress throughout the life cycle
(Cozolino, 2010).
Cortisol. Is a key stress hormone and is a (GR) present in nearly every human tissue.
Sustained high levels of stress via trauma have been shown to increase cortisol production thus
weakening the immune system via the prevention of T-cell proliferation, disruption of protein
synthesis, neural growth halting, and even neural death. Furthermore, prolonged stress is
correlated with structural deficits in brain development and reductions in amygdala and
7
with affect regulation, cognitive processing, and emotional bonding (Cozolino, 2010).
Mental Health
This growing area of science has had remarkable implications on the mental health
profession. It has given us hope and provided a glimpse into how nearly all psychosocial
traumas, hardships, and tragedies may be overcome and further utilized as staging for increased
resilience throughout life. Meaning that most traumatic or abusive situations can be remedied
Brain Structure
reduction in hippocampal size and volume and heightened sensitivity of the right amygdala
leading to the ineffective processing of psychological responses across the brain by limiting and
amygdala and disrupted communication between integrating and regulating circuits ends up
amplifying stress related anxiety (Badenoch, 2008). This also explains why those exposed to
high stress are predictably more sensitive to even minor external events at both sympathetic and
parasympathetic levels. However, when we look at this phenomenon through the prism of
cognitive behavioral theory, other components must be considered which are worthy of further
research. One such development of growing interest is Post Traumatic Growth (PTG).
The concept of strength through struggle is not new. Modern theorists have constructed
the concept of PTG as the positive psychological change experienced resulting from struggle
with highly challenging life circumstances (Jayawickreme, & Blackie, 2014). Exhaustive
8
research is available to support the argument that traumatic life events can indeed result in
positive life change (Affleck & Tennen, 1996; Aldwin, 1994; Blackie, Jayawickreme,
Tsukayama, Forgeard, Roepke, & Fleeson, 2016; Calhoun, 1995; Carver 1998; Cohen & Wills,
1985; Duan, Guo, & Gan, 2015; House, House, & Umberson, 1988; Helgeson & Cohen, 1996;
Jayawickreme, & Blackie, 2014; Jin, Xu, & Liu, 2014; Park, Cohen, & Murch, 1996; Shamia,
principals. For example, one reason posited to explain PTG is that it enables the individual to
evolve a sense of wisdom about the world by disengaging from prior beliefs and assumptions in
order to formulate new goals, identities and beliefs. This observation of the individual
incorporating the experienced trauma(s) (Park, 2010) is a nearly identical to the evidenced based
cognitive processing therapy (CPT). PTG and CPT, over time leads to greater satisfaction with
life (Jayawickreme & Blackie, 2014) such are the goals of effective CBT interventions.
PTG can also occur through emotion-focused coping or rumination as a way of actively
coming to terms with the traumatic event (Tedeschi, & Calhoun, 1995) via active coping efforts,
(Jayawickreme & Blackie, 2014) which mirrors another CBT modality referred to as Trauma
Other cognitive behavioral themes that are found in PTG stem from increases in meaning
and wellbeing (Joseph & Linley, 2005) and changes in an individuals life narrative (Pals &
McAdams, 2004) both of which also occur within the cognitive behavioral realm and are treated
across a range of CBT treatment interventions that will be discussed in further detail below.
9
Treatment
number of effective evidence based cognitive behavioral treatment modalities covering a broad
range of trauma related injuries. Below are descriptions of several CBT based treatments
CPT is a 12-session psychotherapy for PTSD. CPT teaches you how to evaluate and
change the upsetting thoughts you have had since your trauma. By changing your thoughts, you
can change how you feel. Fifty-three percent of those who receive CPT will no longer have
Prolonged Exposure (PE) is another specific type of CBT. PE usually takes 8-15 weekly
sessions, that are 1.5 hours each. PE teaches you to gradually approach trauma-related memories,
feelings, and situations that you have been avoiding since your trauma. By confronting these
challenges, you can actually decrease your PTSD symptoms. Fifty-three percent of those who
Stress Inoculation Training, (SIT), is another less effective type of Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy (CBT) lasting about 3 months of weekly 60-90 minute sessions. By teaching you coping
skills, SIT works to help you find new ways to deal with symptoms. SIT is often done in a group
or individually with one or two providers. However, only twenty percent of those who receive
EMDR is an individual psychotherapy for PTSD covering about 1-3 months of weekly
50-90 minute sessions. EMDR has been receiving strong reviews from veterans but is not widely
accessible at VA hospitals yet. In most cases you are not asked to talk about the details of your
trauma but rather to think about your trauma during sessions. EMDR is posited to help you
process upsetting memories, thoughts, and feelings related to trauma. By processing traumatic
experiences, you may get relief from symptoms. Fifty-three percent of those who receive CPT
Diversity
hardship, is reflected in the data, which shows more typically oppressed population groups have
lower rates of veteran suicide (Reger, Smolenski, Skopp, et al., 2015). Specifically, Black
veterans demonstrate the lowest suicide rate of (10.5/100,000). Conversely, the White veteran
suicide rate is doubled at (20.17/100,000). Comparably, Asian or Pacific Islanders and Hispanics
have a rate of approximately (12/100,000). However, the Native American veteran population
has the highest rate (30/100,000) (Reger, Smolenski, Skopp, et al., 2015).
With the data it becomes plausible to posit that Black, Asian, and Hispanic veterans have
a lower rate of suicide due to built up resiliencies developed both epigenetically and via the
population may demonstrate a higher rate of suicide due to a shortage of resiliency possibly due
study.
Discussion
11
now have that data to peer into the root causes. Most of which have little to do with combat,
trauma or PTSD and almost everything to do with status of discharge and the impact such
Discharge Status
The highest rate of suicide amongst the veteran population (44-48/100,000) observed by
those that served less than one through three years of active duty and never deployed (Reger, et
al., 2015). Compared with a rate of (21/100,00) for those whom served 4 years and (11/100,000)
for those that serve 20 years or more. Considering the standard enlistment contract is four years
at minimum we can infer that those whom served less than four were somehow discharged under
less than honorable conditions. Ironically the population of veterans with a less than honorable
discharge have a rate of suicide (45/100,000) which corresponds to the rate observed in those
that served less than two years as compared to the rate (22/100,000) observed by veterans with
Discharge status is commonly not considered amongst the civilian population, yet it has
broad reaching implications across biopsychosocial spheres and impacts a veterans ability to
under less than honorable conditions, he or she is effectively ineligible for most of the valuable
resources, which assist in the transition from service member to civilian. Such resources include
education, health care, disability compensation and mental health services. It is this relationship
to gains in social and psychological resources (Hobfoll, Hall, Canetti-Nisim, Galea, Johnson &
Palmieri, 2007) that arguably lead to repeated examples of PTG amongst combat veterans
discharged honorably while those discharged under less than honorable conditions are unable to
12
effectively adapt to the sense of isolation and shame that often accompany a failed term of
Thus it is the dishonorably discharged service members whom require the most mental
health care that find themselves rejected and helpless. It is this population that kills themselves
to expand mental health care to former service members with other-than-honorable discharges
and in Crisis (VA, 2017, 2) Considering the benefit demonstrated by CBT treatment, this shift in
VA policy may very well begin to finally address the root cause of the veteran suicide crisis
while enabling the combat veteran population to inspire others through growing examples of
PTG such that the exaltation of victimization can cease and resilience and strength can manifest.
13
References:
Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1996). Construing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance
Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. New York
Guilford.
Applegate, J., & Shapiro, J. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and
Badenoch, B. (2008). Through the lens of diagnosis: Depression, anxiety, dissociation &
Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart, &
Winston
Blackie, L. E. R., Jayawickreme, E., Tsukayama, E., Forgeard, M. J. C., Roepke, A. M.,
Personality, doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.001
Bush, N. G., Reger, M. A., Luxton, D. D., Skopp, N. A., Kinn, J., Smolenski, D., &
Gahm, G. A. (2013). Suicides and suicide attempts in the U.S. military, 20082010.
Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and thriving: Issues, models, and linkages. Journal of
Cohen. S., &Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.
Cozolino, L. (2010). The neuroscience of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY:
W.W. Norton.
Duan, W., Guo, P., & Gan, P. (2015). Relationships among trait resilience, virtues, post-
e0125707. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125707
Eriksson, P.S., Perfileva, E., Bjork-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A. M., Nordborg, C., Peterson,
Medicine, 4, 1313-1317)
http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2382973
Gould, E., Reeves, A.J., Graziana, M.S., & Gross, C.G. (1999). Neurogenesis in the
Gould, E., Tanapat, P., Hastings, N.B., & Shors, T.J. (1999). Neurogenesis in adulthood:
Gross, C.G. (2000). Neurogenesis in the adult brain: Death of a dogma. Nature Review
of Neuroscience, 1, 67-73.
15
Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer:
Hobfoll, S. E., Hall, B. J., Canetti-Nisim, D., Galea, S., Johnson, R. J., & Palmieri, P. A.
House, J. S., House, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health.
perspective, 509-522.
JAMA (2014). Suicide risk among soldiers: early findings from Army Study to Assess
71(5):487-9.
16
Kang, H.K., Bullman, T.A., Smolenski D.J., Skopp, N.A., Gahm G.A., & Reger, M.A.
(2014). Suicide risk among 1.3 million veterans who were on active duty during
Kemp, J., & Bossarte, R. (2012). Suicide Data Report, 2012. Department of Veterans
http://www.va.gov/opa/docs/suicide-data-report-2012-final.pdf
Leardmann, C. A., Powell, T. M., Smith, T. C., Bell, M. R., Smith, B., Boyko, E.
J., . . . Hoge, C. W. (2013). Risk factors associated with suicide in current and
310(5), 496506.
Lowe S., Manove E. & Rhodes J. (2013). Posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth
Pals, J. L., & McAdams, D. P. (2004). The transformed self: A narrative understanding
Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. L. (1996). Assessment and prediction of stress-
Pietrzak R., Goldstein M., Malley J., et al. (2010). Posttraumatic growth in veterans of
126, 230235.
Purves, D., & Voyvodic, J., T. (1987). Imaging mammalian nerve cells and their
Reger, M.A., Smolenski, D. J., Skopp, N. A., Metzger-Abamukang, M. J., Kang, H. K.,
Bullman, T. A., Perdue, S., & Gahm, G. A. (2015). Risk of Suicide Among US
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Shamia, N. A., Thabet, A. A. M., & Vostanis, P. (2015). Exposure to war traumatic
nurses in gaza. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 22(10), 749-
755. doi:10.1111/jpm.12264
18
http://www.va.gov/opa/publications/factsheets/Suicide_Prevention_FactSheet_N
ew_VA_Stats_070616_1400.pdf
online: http://www.mentalhealth.va.gov/docs/2016suicidedatareport.pdf
https://www.va.gov/opa/pressrel/includes/viewPDF.cfm?id=2867