647

75 647203-2122010 1
J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol. 75 No. 647, 203-212, Jan., 2010

DETECTION
DETECTIONAND
ANDPARTIAL
PARTIALSTRENGTHENING
STRENGTHENING OF A STRUCTURAL WEAK POINT
STRUCTURAL WEAK POINT
ININR/C
R/CSHEAR
SHEARWALLS
WALLSBASED
BASED ON
ON FORCE
FORCE MEASUREMENTS
MEASUREMENTS

* ** *




Taizo HIROSE,
Taizo HIROSE,Yasushi
Yasushi SANADA, andYuta
SANADA and YutaSASHIMA
SASHIMA

This paper describes an experimental study on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete shear walls. A series of structural tests was
conducted using several types of shear wall specimens: one normal and three specific specimens. One of specific specimens was designed
to measure internal forces on the critical section, which identified a structural weak point in this kind of structure. Based on the result,
partial strengthening was applied to other specific specimens. Steel jacketing applied only to the structural weak point significantly
improved the seismic performance, in particular ductility, compared to the normal specimen.

Keywords: Internal force measurement, R/C, Shear wall, Static loading test, Strengthening, Stress concentration, Structural weak point

RC

RC

RC

3 RC
1 3/10

*


Graduate
Graduate Student,
Student, GraduateSchool
Graduate SchoolofofEngineering,
Engineering, Toyohashi
ToyohashiUniversity
Universityofof
Technology
Technology


** Assoc. Prof., Faculty
Associate ofFaculty
Professor, Engineering, Toyohashi
of Engineering, University
Toyohashi of Technology,
University Dr. Eng.
of Technology, Dr. Eng.

1
203


3



a b

2
204








R=1/800rad.
R=1/200rad.
R=1/200rad.
352.0kN R=1/100rad.

R=0.0138rad. 50


2 R=1/100rad.
368.5kN
300kN
R=1/50rad.
R1/800 1 R=1/4001/2001/1001/50
2
1 h/l 1.2

2

1/100rad.
1

105mm



1/200rad.


750mm 1000












1/400rad.
1/200rad.

3
205


4
206


5
207
 R=1/100rad.

R=1/200rad. R=1/100rad. 7

R=1/50rad.




R=1/200rad.
R=1/100rad.
1 2



R=1/100rad.

4.1 5

225mm





1 2



40

1
c c 0 c 0 (1)
0.8 0.34t /c 0

cc0
c0t

6
208


4.2

7
209








2

3

1.5

RC

R=1/200rad.
R=1/100rad. 356.0kN

R=1/50rad.


7% 30%


R=1/200rad.
R=1/100rad.
384.5kN 5

8
210


10% 10


R=1/50rad.R=1.5%



70
10% 70%

RC

2

A

2 16686033

211

1) 12 Vol.30No.3pp.505-5102008.7
6) Botirjon Yorkinov
HWSNo.497 RC
pp.149-1561997.7 Vol.74No.641pp.1335-13442009.7
2) 7)
2001 2001.10
Vol.47Bpp.511-5202001.3 8)
3) Hakim BechtoulaMasanobu SakashitaSusumu KonoFumio Watanabe 1990.11
Seismic Performance of Frame under Large Cyclic Deformation and Axial 9) Vecchio, F. J.: Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete
Load VariationVol.26No.2pp.523-528 Membranes, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 26-35, Jan.-Feb. 1989
2004.6 10)
4)
Vol.27No.2 No.426pp.15-241991.8
pp. 451-4562005.6 11) RC
5) Botirjon Yorkinov No.502pp.113-1181997.12

2009 5 8 2009 9 24

10
212