Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Following Proudhon and Raiffeisens efforts in the 19th century, the microcredit
sector is again developing in Western Europe 1. Persistent unemployment and
pressure on public funds have focused attention on microcredit as a tool to foster
self-employment and thereby also promote social and financial inclusion. Whilst
research needs are similar to those in developing countries, the context in which this
new generation of microcredit programmes is implemented is very different.
Research in Western Europe has to take account of an increasingly service oriented
and technology dominated economy, the changing role of the welfare state, the
legal and bureaucratic characteristics of each country, clients who are relatively
more difficult to reach and structural and regulatory factors that make sustainability
challenging.
In its present form, the microcredit sector is young. Nevertheless, a number of
research projects have been conducted and several others are underway. The
European Microfinance Network (EMN), a network of organisations involved in
microfinance in Europe, coordinates a research group and also has its own research
function. This article uses information collected by EMN and its research group to
discuss research needs, themes and projects being implemented.
The article shows that research is at present carried out by universities, research
centres and networks of microcredit practitioners. Most projects involve applied
research and cover issues such as sector analysis, policy and regulation, efficiency,
operational performance, at risk groups and impact. It appears that there is
relatively less theoretical research taking place at present. There are, however,
applied research projects that are developing and testing analytical frameworks.
Given the specific nature of the Western European environment, thematic priorities
are and should continue to be related to reaching groups at risk of social and
economic exclusion, ensuring a supportive regulatory and policy environment and
addressing concepts of sustainability and the impact of microcredit.
Research Needs
Although research needs with respect to client demand, operational performance
and impact are similar, the context in which Western European programmes are
implemented is very different from that in developing countries.
For example, research in Western Europe has to take into consideration the changing
role of the welfare state and the legal and bureaucratic specificities of each country.
Welfare programmes, taxation regimes and business registration processes
sometimes create barriers to self-employment and microenterprise. 3 Research into
the legal and regulatory environment for both microenterprises as well as
microlenders is needed to identify good practice and to promote an enabling
environment.
The proportion of the population that can benefit from microcredit is smaller than in
developing countries and can be more difficult to reach. In developing countries,
microcredit is relevant to large portions of the economically active population given
limited bank coverage and widespread poverty. By contrast, 15% of the European
Unions population is at risk of poverty and, with a highly developed financial sector,
10% of the population is estimated to be financially excluded. 4 Potential microloan
2
Overview of the Microfinance Sector 2002-2003, nef-EMN, 2004; Preliminary Results of Microfinance
Sector Survey 2004-2005, EMN, June, 2006.
3
Policy Measures for Promotion of the Use of Microcredit in Europe for Social Inclusion, Evers & Jung,
Facet, nef, EMN, MFC, 2005
4
Joint Report on Social Inclusion 2004, European Commission Directorate for Employment and Social
Affairs, 2004. Carbo Valverde S. and Lopez del Paso, R., 2005, Exclusin financiera: un panorama,
clients are geographically dispersed and are affected by years of unemployment and
economic inactivity.5 With an economy increasingly dominated by services and
technology, adapting to the new economy is a challenge for unemployed people.
Significant outreach and non-financial support is required to reach clients, increase
borrower self-confidence and to help these new entrepreneurs manage complex
regulatory environments. In this context, research should examine the profile and
capacities of the unemployed and other groups at risk of poverty and exclusion in
order to develop appropriate loan products and non-financial services as well as
marketing and outreach strategies.
Sustainability and operational performance are also significant challenges for the
sector. Structural costs and operating methods combined with legal and regulatory
restrictions on interest rates and microlender borrowing hinder sustainability.
Alternative and adapted approaches to conceiving of and measuring sustainability,
efficiency and return on investment are important as is work on interest rates and
borrowing regulations.6
For the microcredit practitioner, research needs and possibilities are vast. In simple
terms, lender needs can be divided into two categories: immediate and strategic.
Immediate needs are related to monitoring of outputs such as client numbers,
repayment rates, portfolio quality, business survival rates and client income. Much
of this information serves internal management purposes and is reported to donors.
Strategic needs include investigation of many of the themes raised above as well as
increasing interest and visibility of their programmes and addressing particular
issues identified during monitoring.
Most microlenders effectively undertake output monitoring on a regular basis.
However, the majority of lenders in Western Europe are small organisations, with
limited staff. Their research capacity is not necessarily designed to address the full
range of issues outlined above. Researchers can help microlenders undertake
strategic investigation through their knowledge of research design best practice,
research methodologies and data analysis.
Perspectivas del sistema financiero, n. 84, Fundacin de las Cajas de Ahorros, Madrid, quoted in
Exercising the Right to Credit: Financial Inclusion and the Role of Savings Banks in Spain, Silvia Rico
Garrido and Maricruz Lacalle Calderon, in Finance Pour le Bien Commun, forthcoming, 2006.
5
On ne Prte (Pas) quaux Riches : La Rvolution du Microcrdit, Maria Nowak, JC Latts, 2005.
6
Preliminary Results of Microfinance Sector Survey 2004-2005, EMN, June, 2006; Un outil au service
de la croissance et de la cohsion sociale : Le dveloppement du microcrdit au sein de lUnion
Europenne, Maria Nowak, in Finance Pour le Bien Commun, forthcoming, 2006.
7
To access this list contact emn@european-microfinance.org.
research on the regulatory environment and policy, studies of at risk groups,
sustainability, impact and the role of banking institutions.
Projects are led by universities, research centres and networks of practitioners.
Researchers and practitioner networks are also collaborating on certain projects.
Individual lenders input is focused on data provision and implementation of results
and in some case research design as well. This model is working well at present
because it builds on the relative strengths of each actor and creates synergies.
Sector Surveys
The majority of studies focus on describing this quickly developing sector. Country-
level overviews have been undertaken in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom,
member states with relatively large numbers of individual microlenders. 8 A variety of
organisations have carried out these studies from practitioner networks to
universities and research centres. Europe-wide sector surveys have also been
undertaken by research organisations and practitioner networks. 9 EMN itself is
presently undertaking its second survey of the microfinance sector in the European
Union in collaboration with several microfinance networks and research foundations.
These surveys have tracked sector size and growth trends and have identified good
practice and challenges. They have served a strategic need to increase the profile
and visibility of the sector. They have also assisted in enabling dialogue with
European Union, member states and financial sector actors.
Sustainability
Conceptual, definitional, structural and legal issues make the debate about
establishing sustainable microlending programmes very different from that in
developing countries.
Conceptually, microcredit in Western Europe is in most cases conceived as a tool for
bringing the socially excluded into the mainstream economy through
entrepreneurship. There is relatively less focus on creating viable microlenders that
meet the needs of increasingly large numbers of the population in a sustainable
manner.13 There is also debate about the meaning of sustainable. Should
sustainability mean that clients cover all costs? Or, given microlendings social
policy objectives in Western Europe, should there be long-term public-private
11
Joint Report on Social Inclusion 2004, European Commission Directorate for Employment and Social
Affairs, 2004; Microcredit for Small Businesses and Business Creation: Bridging a Market Gap,
European Union, DG Enterprise, 2004.
12
Immigrants and Financial Services: Literacy, Difficulty of Access, Needs and Solutions, The Spanish
Experience, Giordano DelAmore Foundation, 2004; Immigrants Participation in Microloan Programmes
in Western Europe, EMN, 2006; Women and Microlending in Western Europe, EMN, 2006; Women
and Microfinance: A New Path for Development in Mediterranean Countries? Fondazione Risorsa Donna,
2005; Who Benefits? The Difficulties for Women in Making the Transition from Unemployment to Self-
employment, nef, Prowess, 2003; Les Petites Activits Gnratrices de Revenus dans les Quartiers
Prcariss, Adie, 2005.
13
Developing an Approach to Assess the Performance of Microfinance in Europe: Experience from a UK
Research Study, Karl Dayson, Hao Quach, Finance Pour le Bien Commun, forthcoming, 2006.
partnerships to ensure that microcredit programmes are sustained with clients
paying only a portion of costs? 14
Structurally, microlender staff costs are high in countries where employers and
employees make significant contributions to the welfare state. In addition,
microlenders provide business development services due to weaknesses in existing
provision or to assist borrowers to navigate the complicated business registration
and tax regimes prevailing in many Western European countries. These services
have a cost and many lenders do not differentiate these costs from loan processing.
Moreover, interest rate caps in most countries mean that microlenders are unable to
price for risk and cover loan processing costs. And bars against lending for onward
borrowing limit microlender economies of scale.
At present, not a single microlender has achieved sustainability in Western Europe,
although it is a long-term objective for many lenders. Some experts wonder whether
sustainability, as it is defined in developing countries, is attainable in Western
Europe and whether subsidies of some sort are required indefinitely. Given this
scenario, research is looking at microlender efficiency, in order to enable lenders to
stream line costs and prove efficiency to public and private sector donors and
guarantors.15 Others are looking at how business development services should be
provided and the best way to ensure that these services are funded. 16 Social return
on investment is another topic receiving attention as microlenders seek to provide
information on the relative savings to state budgets of investing in microfinance as
compared to paying long term unemployment benefits. 17 And policy work is
addressing interest rate caps. In addition, the work on efficiency and social return on
investment is supporting the development and testing of analytical tools that can be
shared widely and can in future enhance both operational performance and
performance measurement.
There is a need to continue to focus research efforts in this area and to bring the
different strands of the discussion (conceptual, definitional, structural, organisational
and regulatory) together to develop a holistic view of the question.
Impact
Worldwide, microlenders and microfinance providers seem to have mastered
monitoring client numbers, repayment rates and portfolio performance. For both
theoretical and practical reasons, measuring impact on clients lives and livelihoods
has been undertaken with greater difficulty.
Information received by EMN as well as its on-going sector survey indicates that not
many formal evaluations of the quality of microlending and business development
14
First Microfinance Now BDS (Again?), Klaas Molenaar, Finance Pour le Bien Commun, forthcoming,
2006.
15
Are Community Development Finance Institutions Doing Too Much?, Karl Dayson, Presentation ISBE
Conference, November, 2005.
16
Microkredieten in Nederland, Een nog onontgonnen gebeid, kansen en uitdagingen voor banken en
starters, FACET BV for the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs, 2006.
17
Social Return on Investment: Valuing What Matters, nef, 2000; WEETU Social Return on Investment
Report, WEETU, nef, forthcoming, 2006; Adie 2003 Rapport dEvaluation, Adie, France, 2004.
services are undertaken.18 In addition, of the research reports and evaluations that
EMN has identified so far, two look at the question of impact. 19
The limited research on programme quality and impact may mean that this type of
assessment is not taking place or that evaluation reports remain internal. Whilst
practitioners are good at measuring outputs, measuring programme quality and
impact is the next step and is crucial to ensuring achievement of goals,
improvement in client lives and accountability to donors. Measuring and attributing
programme impact to microlending activities, whilst challenging, can be achieved.
Impact measurement is a key area where researchers and practitioners can
collaborate in the design of practical research methods and tools.
Conclusion
18
Business Advisory Service for New and Recently Established Micro Firms, Turku School of Economics
and Business Administration, Finland, 2004; Finnvera Oyj: Kansainvlinen arviointi (International
evaluation of Finnvera Oyj); Adie 2003 Rapport dEvaluation, Adie, France, 2004.
19
WEETU Social Impact Evaluation Report, WEETU, forthcoming 2006; Women and Microfinance: A
New Path for Development in Mediterranean Countries?, Fondazione Risorsa Donna, 2005; Money-go-
Round. Recycling Finance: Realising Potential, CDFA 2003.
20
Banks and Micro-lending: Support, Co-operation and Learning, Facet, IFF, 2000; Micro-credit as a
Model for Efficient Commercial Small scale Lending and its Application in Banks, Evers and Jung; 2000;
European Regulation for Socially Responsible Banks? Learning the lessons from the US American CRA,
C. Guene, E. Mayo, 2001; Banking and Social Cohesion: Alternative Responses to a Globalised Market,
C. Guene, E. Mayo, 2001. Las Entidades Sociales de Apoyo al Microcrdito: Su papel en la concesin de
microcrditos en Espaa, Foro Nantik Lum, 2005.
Research undertaken on the Western European microcredit sector falls into six
thematic areas: sector surveys, the regulatory and policy environment, at risk
groups, sustainability, programme quality and impact and the role of the banking
sector. Given the specificities of the Western European environment, thematic
priorities are and must continue to be related to reaching groups at risk of social and
economic exclusion and ensuring a supportive regulatory and policy environment.
Considerable effort is also needed to bring together the different strands of thinking
and applied work on concepts and definitions of sustainability as well as their
application in concrete terms. Impact does not appear to be receiving much
attention at present. The sector would benefit from development of theoretical
constructs and practical tools for measuring social and economic impact of its work.
Research conducted is primarily applied and is lead by researchers and microlender
practitioner networks, often working in collaboration. Practitioners participate in
research either directly or via their professional network organisations. At present
this model appears to be working well. It is building on the respective strengths of
each stakeholder and is having a practical impact in certain cases. In the case of
regulation and policy, research seems to be contributing to positive changes in the
environment for microenterprise and microlenders in some countries. Practitioners
are also using research findings on at risk groups to re-design or implement new
programme approaches and seek additional funding to do so.
Looking across Europe, however, country coverage is uneven. It should be of little
surprise that the greatest amount of research seems to be taking place in countries
with the greatest amount of microlending activity. The challenge will be to ensure
that the lessons learned are made available to organisations initiating lending in
countries with lower activity levels. Country level practitioner networks as well as
EMN have an important role to play in this respect.