Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Rapid progress in population calls for the increase in necessity of structures for living. Under the changed circumstances, the
vertical growth of buildings i.e. constructions of multi-storeyed buildings has become inevitable both for residential and as well as
office purposes. In order to compete in the ever growing competent market it is very important for a structural engineer to save
time. as a sequel to this an attempt is made to analyze and design a Multi-storeyed building by using a software package RFEM.
Many leading software like STAAD-PRO, AUTOCAD, ETABS, RFEM, RX-TIMBER, etc. are available in the market used
vividly for their project design purpose .With the objective to fulfil the above, the existing Mechanical block, RGMCET is chosen
for the study. Only the superstructure is analysed neglecting the effect of seismic forces. The results obtained from RFEM agree
with the results from Kanis method.
Keywords: Multi-Storey Buildings, Softwares, Analyze, Design, RFEM, Kanis Method
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
RFEM is a powerful 3D FEA program helping structural engineers to meet requirements in modern civil engineering. The RFEM
program family is based on a modular system. Mainly RFEM is used to define structures, materials and loads for planar and spatial
structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells and members. It is also possible to create combined structures as well as
modelling solid and contact elements.
The modular approach allows you to combine all programs individually according to your needs. Upgrades at a later time are
always possible. RFEM offers numerous interfaces representing as the perfect tool as smooth interaction between CAD and
structural analysis in Building Information Modelling (BIM).
Table - 1
Comparative study
Bending Moments (in kNm)
Sl.no Members % error
Kanis method RFEM
1 AB +42.35 +43.20 2.00
2 BA +84.70 +87.64 3.47
3 BE -232.94 -237.95 2.15
4 BC +148.23 150.31 1.40
5 CB +169.41 173.70 2.53
6 CD -169.40 -173.70 2.53
7 DC +455.30 444.57 2.35
8 DG +169.40 173.70 2.53
9 EB +423.53 415.40 1.91
10 EH -423.53 -415.40 1.91
11 GD +169.40 173.70 2.53
12 GH -169.40 -173.70 2.53
13 HG -148.23 148.23 0
14 HE +234.94 237.95 2.15
15 HJ -84.70 87.64 3.47
16 JH -42.35 -43.20 2.00
The structure chosen to be analysed is G+3 institution building. The plan of the building is shown below. It is an existing building,
Mechanical Block in RGMCET, Nandyal.
Structure Specifications
3 lecture halls in each floors (8.52 X 10.35)m
Storeroom (2.44X10.35)m
Stairs (6.7X3.75)m
Staffroom (3.65X3.75)m
Washroom (3.35X5.8)m
Staffroom (3.35X5.8)m
Lecture hall 1(8.23X18.65)m
Lecture hall 2(14.6X5.38)m
Corridor (41.60X2.3)m
Dimensions are considered as per the centre line of the wall
Calculation of Loads
Dead loads:
Self-weight
Masonry load
Wall load=height of the wall X width X Density of masonry material
For beam,
B1 (3.6-0.6)X0.30X18.85X1=16.965kN/m2
B2 (3.6-0.3)X0.28X18.85X1=14.310 kN/m2
B3 (3.6-0.45)X0.30X18.85X1=17.813kN/m2
B4 (3.6-0.375)X0.30X18.85X1=18.2373kN/m2
On corridor beams ,
1.17 X 0.23 X 18.85=5.10kN/m2
Live Loads
As per IS 875 part II
Lecture halls 3kN/m2
Corridor 4kN/m2
Laboratory 3kN/m2
Stairs 5kN/m2
Staff room 2.5kN/m2
Wash room 2kN/m2
Wind loadS
Wind loads as per IS 875 part III
Basic wind speed at the location of building: 39 m/s
Design wind load (as per IS 875 part iii, Clause 5.3)
Vz = Vb k1 k2 k3 k4,
The wind pressure at any height above mean ground level shall be obtained by the following relationship between wind pressure
and wind speed:
Pz= 0.6 Vz2
Pz = wind pressure in N/m2 at height z, and
Vz = design wind speed in m/s at height z.
The design wind pressure pd can be obtained as,
Pd = Kd. Ka. Kc. KZ
Where Kd = Wind directionality factor = 0.9\
Ka = Area averaging factor = 0.9
Kc = Combination factor = 1
Pd= 0.8146 kN/m2
This is multiplied with the area surrounding the joint that is exposed to the wind load.
Creation of loads
Member Load
Go to new member load in the insert ribbon and click on it
Select load type
Load distribution
Load direction
Enter the value of load parameter.
Surface Load
New surface load in the insert ribbon
Select load type
Load distribution
Load direction
Enter the value of load parameter
Wind Load
Wind load can be assigned as UDL over an exposed surface or nodal load assigned at the exposed node. In the current project
nodal loads are assigned.
New nodal load in the insert ribbon
Select the node or enter node number
Give the value of load
Click OK.
Exporting Report
Go to file > select export report > select the type of the file that to be exported and click ok.
CA 1.11 -0.213
C CD 0.386 2.606 -0.74
CE 1.11 -0.213
DB 1.11 -0.213
D DC 0.386 2.606 -0.74
DF 1.11 -0.213
EC 1.11 -0.213
E EF 0.386 2.606 -0.74
EG 1.11 -0.213
FD 1.11 -0.213
F FE 0.386 2.606 -0.74
FH 1.11 -0.213
GE 1.11 -0.213
G GH 0.386 2.606 -0.74
GI 1.11 -0.213
HF 1.11 -0.213
H HG 0.386 2.606 -0.74
HJ 1.11 -0.213
Table - 2
Calculation of distribution factors
Storey Member Stiffness(k) k Distribution Factor
AC 1.11
I 2.22 -0.75
BD 1.11
CE 1.11
II 2.22 -0.75
FD 1.11
GE 1.11
III 2.22 -0.75
HF 1.11
IG 1.11
IV 2.22 -0.75
JH 1.11
Step 2: Calculation of Fixed end moments
Step 3: Calculation of Final End Moments
Rules for the Calculation of final end moments (side sway cases)
For beams, End moment = FEM + 2 near end contribution + Far end contributions.
For columns, End moment. = FEM + 2 near end contribution + Far end contribution + linear displacement contribution of
that column for the latest cycle.
Table - 3
Final end moments.
Fixed End Moment Near End Contribution Far End Contribution Final End Moment
Member
(in kNm) (in kNm) (in kNm) (in kNm)
AB -350.42 45.21 -42.17 -302.17
BA 350.42 -42.17 45.21 311.29
CD -424.69 22.43 -14.81 -394.64
DC 424.69 -14.81 22.43 417.5
EF -424.69 30.89 -15.41 -378.32
FE 424.69 -15.41 30.89 424.76
GH -424.69 39.19 -18.24 -364.55
HG 424.69 -18.24 39.19 427.4
AC 0 130.02 64.57 324.61
CA 0 64.57 130.02 259.16
BD 0 -121.3 -42.63 -285.23
DB 0 -42.63 -121.3 -206.56
CE 0 64.57 88.9 218.04
EC 0 88.9 64.57 242.37
DF 0 -42.63 -44.37 -129.63
FD 0 -44.37 -42.63 -131.37
EG 0 88.9 112.81 290.61
GE 0 112.81 88.9 314.52
FH 0 -44.37 -52.49 -141.23
HF 0 -52.49 -44.37 -149.35
GI 0 112.81 0 225.62
IG 0 0 112.81 112.81
HJ 0 -52.49 0 -104.98
JH 0 0 -52.49 -52.49
Results obtained from both manual analysis and RFEM are compared. The following tables show the comparison of results.
Note: Sign convention in RFEM is different from manual analysis. Clockwise moments are taken as positive for Kani s method
where as they were considered negative in RFEM .To avoid confusion, the final moments from Kanis method are expressed with
the same sign convention as considered in RFEM.
This is the frame considered initially for showing the calculation of Rotation factors and distribution factors.
Table - 4
FEM of beams of Y5 frame
Beams RFEM Kani's method
250.98 302.17
638
264.84 -311.29
350.76 394.64
509
343.76 417.5
345.53 378.32
515
344.32 -424.76
336.9 364.55
273
344.18 -427.4
Table - 5
FEM of columns of Y5 frame
Columns REFM Kani's method
191.17 -292.46
568
257.36 -225.21
195.82 315.58
567
236.29 236.91
172.27 -136.13
439
163.82 -148.65
320.11 199.73
438
310.35 201.47
198.63 -178.22
311
183.35 -202.13
182.50 253.62
310
176.50 261.74
68.42 -133.13
51
147.72 -20.32
63.79 197.47
50
130.32 144.98
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, analysis of a multi- storey building is done using RFEM and Kanis method and the results obtained from both
methods have been compared and the results found to agree with each other.
Using RFEM the analysis of the multi- storied building completed much quicker when compared to analysis using Kanis
method.
The variation is negligible for the members for less final end moments but was significant where final moments are higher.
The end moments obtained from Kanis method are higher than those obtained from RFEM.
Effective modelling can be done in RFEM when compared with STAAD-PRO.
REFERENCES
[1] Ramamrutham, Theory of structures ,Third edition
[2] Indian codes referred:
IS 875: Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Building and Structures,
IS 875: Part 1 Dead Loads Unit Weights of Building Materials and Stored Materials, Bureau of Indian Standards, Eighth Reprint Sept. 2003, 37 pages.
IS 875: Part 2 Imposed Loads, Bureau of Indian Standards, Sixth Reprint June 1998, 18 pages
[3] Dr. Prem Krishna Dr. Krishen Kumar Dr. N.M. Bhandari, IS 875: Part 3, Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, 105 pages.
[4] Website: https://www.dlubal.com/en/webinars.aspx