Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267479970
CITATIONS READS
0 226
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Marie-Caroline Pinget M. on 29 October 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
th
10 Swiss Geoscience Meeting, Bern 2012
The results achieved so far suggest that copper-wad s. str. is mainly the
chrysocolla-like material. The compositional variability (Fig. 2a.) may be
explained by the fact that copper-wad covers other minerals (like lebethenite in
Fig. 2b) that cannot be discriminated during analysis.
REFERENCES
Ossandn G, Frraut R, Gustafson LB, Lindsay DD, Zentilli M (2001) Geology of the
Chuquicamata Mine: A progress report. Economic Geology 96, 351-366.
Pinget MC, Fontbot L, Dold B, Ramirez F, Vergara M. 2011. The supergene
enrichment at Chuquicamata revisited. In SGA Biennal Meeting No 11. Antofagasta,
823-825.
Pinget MC, Dold B, Fontbot L, Vergara M, Rojas de la Rivera J. 2012. Mineraloga de
la mineralizacin extica en Chuquicamata: nuevos avances. In 13th Congreso
Geolgico Chileno, Antofagasta, Chile, 37-39.
Sillitoe RH (2005) Supergene oxidized and enriched porphyry copper related deposits.
Economic Geology 100th Anniversary Volume, 723-768.