Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On
Edition 1
December 2005
AISM Association of Internationale de Signalisation Maritime IALA
Page 1 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
Page 2 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
1.1 Scope
The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for the management and
monitoring of AIS information for, and by, Authorities.
Page 3 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
The AIS unit may not, in all cases, be installed in accordance with the IMO
Guidelines.
This can result in poor performance and erroneous transmissions.
The AIS fitted on ships as a mandatory carriage requirement, may, under certain
circumstances, be switched off.
This can occur particularly where international agreements, rules or standards
provide for the protection of navigational information.
AIS is subject to the discrepancies and limitations of VHF-FM propagation.
AIS is subject to vulnerability aspects of GNSS.
Vulnerability of GNSS is further identified in IALA Recommendation XXX on
GNSS Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures. At present, both non RAIM
enabled, and RAID enabled equipment is identified for SOLAS vessels,
depending on the date the equipment was fitted (prior to July 1, 2003 or after July
1, 2003). Ships fitted with older receivers will transmit an incorrect position and
the OOW may be unaware that incorrect own ships positions are being
transmitted.
Page 4 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
Page 5 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
Page 6 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
ANNEX 1
References
Alan L. Blume Toward A Better Understanding Of Waterway Capacity.
ON COURSE, PIANC magazine AISM No. 118 January 2005
EU Directive 2002/59/EC Establishing a Community vessel traffic
monitoring and information system European Parliament and the Council
of 27 June 2002
Helcom Copenhagen Declaration, 10 September 2001
Helcom Expert Working Group on AIS (Documents from) available at
www.helcom.fi
IALA input paper, Risk Analysis of Navigational Safety in Danish Waters.
submitted to IALA ANM Committee: ANM 3/16/2
IMO input paper, Assessment of the traffic in the Baltic Sea West.
submitted by Denmark and Sweden March 2005 to IMO Sub-Committee
on Safety of Navigation 51st session
IMO input paper, New traffic separation schemes in Bornholmsgat and
North of Rgen, recommended route in the east Baltic Sea, amendments to
the traffic separation schemes off Gotland island and South of Gedser and
new areas to be avoided at Hoburgs Bank and Norra Midsjbanken.
submitted by Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania,
Poland and Sweden March 2005 to IMO Sub-Committee on Safety of
Navigation 51st session
IMO input paper, Results of a study on the effect of new routeing
measures in the southern part of the western Baltic Sea. submitted by
Germany March 3rd 2005 to IMO Sub-Committee on Safety of Navigation
51st session
PIANC-Report Approach Channels, A Guide for Design, published April
1995, in co-operation with IAPH, IMPA and IALA
PIANC-Report Wake Wash Guidelines for Managing Wake Wash from
High-Speed Vessels, Report of PIANC Working Group MarCom WG 41
HIGH-SPEED Ferries
Prof. R. Mller, A. Zolder, F. Hartmann, Historical AIS data use for
navigational aids. HANSA International Maritime Journal No. 1 / 2005
Royal Danish Administration of Navigation and Hydrography Maritime
Safety Research in the Baltic Sea a tool for common research areas.
September 2004
Page 7 of 8
Guideline 1050 on the Management and Monitoring of AIS Information
Edition 1 December 2005
ANNEX 2
Page 8 of 8