Professional Documents
Culture Documents
txt
Citation Nr: 1641941
Decision Date: 10/31/16 Archive Date: 11/08/16
THE ISSUES
REPRESENTATION
INTRODUCTION
The Veteran had active service from December 2009 to June 2010.
This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board) from
In April 2015, the Board remanded these claims for additional development.
The claim for PTSD is expanded from the Veteran's original claim to include
The issue of entitlement to a right hip disorder has been raised by the rec
This appeal was processed using the Veterans Benefits Management System (VB
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The notice requirements of the VCAA apply to all five elements of a service
In the present case, the VCAA duty to notify was satisfied by a letter sent
There is no allegation from the Veteran that she has any evidence in her po
As to VA's duty to assist, the Board notes that pertinent records from all
In April 2015, the Board remanded these claims to afford the Veteran VA exa
The VA's duty to assist in the development of the claims is complete, and n
In light of the foregoing, the Board finds that there is no further action
The Veteran seeks entitlement to service connection for a left hip disorder
Applicable Laws
Under the relevant laws and regulations, service connection may be granted
In some cases, lay evidence will also be competent and credible on the issu
The Board must assess the credibility and weight of all the evidence, inclu
The Board notes that it has thoroughly reviewed the record in conjunction w
The Veteran asserts she has a left hip disorder, sinus disorder, bilateral
1. Facts
A VA Problem List does not indicate any diagnoses of these claimed disorder
The Veteran was afforded a VA examination in October 2015 for her claimed l
2. Analysis
The Board notes that the Veteran has asserted she suffers from these claime
The Board has considered the Veteran's arguments. The Board notes that the
The Board finds that the most probative evidence consists of the medical re
The Board finds that the claims must be denied. In sum, because post-servi
Cervical Spine Disorder, Lumbar Spine Disorder, and Right 5th Toe Disorder
1. Facts
The Veteran was afforded a VA examination for her cervical spine and lumbar
The Veteran was afforded a VA examination for her toe in October 2015. The
2. Analysis
Initially, the Board notes that the Veteran has current diagnoses of a cerv
Unfortunately, the Board finds that element (3) under Shedden, nexus, has n
The Board has considered the Veteran's own statements regarding the nature
In the present case, however, the Board finds that the Veteran's lay statem
For these reasons, the Board finds that a preponderance of the evidence is
ORDER
REMAND
The Board notes that the Veteran was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder
1. Obtain and associate with the claims file all updated treatment records
The claims file must be made available and reviewed by the examiner. The e
The examiner must review the VA treatment notes diagnosing and treating the
If there are insufficient facts or data within the claims file, the examine
3. After all of the above actions have been completed, readjudicate the Ve
The Veteran has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the
This claim must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that a
____________________________________________
DEBORAH W. SINGLETON
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Department of Veterans Affairs