You are on page 1of 11

MENU

ARTS

Importance of ornament
Importance of ornament
Alan Powers

29 October 2005 12:00 AM

The Modern Movement in architecture had scarcely succeeded in abolishing ornament before people began to speculate
Twitter Facebook
LinkedIn
Email
about how and when it would return. In Britain, the historian Sir John Summerson, as a young journalist, found it hard to
believe that architecture would be able to communicate without it beyond the initial period of purification which he and many
others believed was a necessary transitional phase. In 1935, the Peter Jones store was fitted with outward-opening bronze
casements in its curtain wall with only sections of blank wall behind them, and the architects suggested that not only could
the walls be repainted periodically in different colours, but also that patterned wallpaper could be used to dress up the
building (it never happened, but it is not too late to try). Osbert Lancaster, more predictably, broadcast in 1951 to celebrate
the death of modern architecture and the recovery of ornament in the Festival of Britain, and was denounced by the
Architects Journal for this heresy. It seems he was far too far ahead of the slow-moving guardians of architectural
righteousness.
It remains a paradox that a movement which allowed architects the freedom to do whatever they wanted put so many
exclusions in the small print, ornament among them. If Post-Modernism in the 1970s looked as if it had torn up this contract,
the shallowness of the messages associated with the movement was matched only by the poor quality of construction through
which such messages were communicated.

The London architectural practice of Caruso St John, the subject of an exhibition at the Architectural Association (until 3
November), recently began a return to ornament that differs from the toy-brick simplifications of Post-Modernism. The
results will be seen more in future projects than in anything so far visible, but it is potentially an exciting move from the heart
of the compound of intellectual architecture. For their proposed front extension of the Museum of Childhood in Bethnal
Green, they have designed geometrical panels of marble veneer, evoking the mid-Victorian Grammar of Ornament by Owen
Jones. For an office building at Kings Cross, they propose that the side faces of the projecting vertical fins dividing the
windows should carry a light-relief pattern based on plant forms. In their exhibition, they place reproductions of drawings for
Clouds, a house by Philip Webb that matches their own rather solemn approach to design and construction.

The essays and building descriptions in an excellent new book, As Built: Caruso St John Architects (a+t ediciones, Vitoria-
Gasteiz, 26, available from The Triangle Bookshop at the AA, 36 Bedford Square, WC1), explain that while they are
interested in history, they do not contemplate stepping right into it. Such has been the view of many of the best modernist
architects of the past 100 years, so that an alternative pantheon of Janus-faced heroes is already well populated. For Caruso St
John, the selection of sources is defined partly by personal choice, but also by the context of each job. The relatively
unchanging facts of building, combined with a love of materials, determines their suspicion of novelty for its own sake. The
way the building is made is part of its meaning, and ornament is one way of extending that meaning. Without being overtly
green, they are worried about the short-termism of so much current construction.

Their Brick House, squeezed into a backyard site in west London, is ingenious and nothing if not bricky. Their design for
repaving the main square of Kalmar in Sweden avoids the tweeness to which cobblestones are prone, without resorting to the
uniform banality which seems usually to be the only alternative on offer. Their largest building to date has been the New Art
Gallery in Walsall (see Spectator, 10 October 1999). Their project for the Centre for Contemporary Art in the Lace Market in
Nottingham (due for completion in 2008) is a latecomer in the sequence of recent gallery projects in Britain, but promises to
be one of the best, and will have a delicate web of pattern across its surface.

On 2 November, Adam Caruso will be one of two architects discussing Architecture and Ornament at an evening event at the
V&A. Does this mean that it has suddenly come in from the cold? While tolerance towards ornament is surely welcome, a
sudden fashion for it could quickly become as self-defeating as Post-Modernism. If some lovers of older architectures regret
that modern architecture ever happened, the fatal mistake was made much earlier, with the onset of rationalism and the
Enlightenment, when ornament began to be conceived as separate from structure, and hence optional and secondary.

It will require a great effort of imagination to cease thinking of ornament as an add-on to buildings, when it should be as
natural as the flower on the end of its stem. Without such a conceptual shift, ornament will last no better than cut flowers, for
the enduring quality found in ornament comes from an internalisation of the processes that make form in nature rather than a
reproduction of a model the vital difference between William Morris and Owen Jones, both of whom Caruso St John
quote visually. Although apparently still enamoured of mechanical form, they seem ready to take this further step into the
water.

Subscribe to The Spectator today for a quality of argument not found in any other publication. Get
more Spectator for less just 12 for 12 issues
issues.

WHAT TO READ NEXT


Gothic dream
Alan Powers

Vertically challenged
Alan Powers
Classical peaceniks
Alan Powers

Halfway to heaven
Alan Powers

Concrete and carbuncles


Alan Powers
Rootstock of radicalism
Alan Powers

Sponsored)Financial)Content

A)smarter)way)for)global)citizens)to Day)Trading)<)Free)6)page)guide)<)Capital Jeff)Keen)reviews)portfolios


invest at)risk performance)and)investment)market
outlook
(Internaxx) (Guardian.Stockbrokers)
(Waverton)

Sponsored stories Recommended by

This game will keep you up all night! Don't Turn Off Your Computer Until British Expats: Discover How the UK
(Vikings) You've Done This Pension Reform Affects You
(Web Life Advice) (Abbey Wealth)
SHOW COMMENTS
CULTURE HOUSE DAILY

Theo Hobson
Why snobs love Love Island
3 July 2017 13:34

Lucy Vickery
Spectator competition winners: Alice in Trumpland
2 July 2017 9:30

Sam Leith
Books Podcast: Jonathan Meades
29 June 2017 12:19
James Delingpole
Despite everything, I love Glastonbury and I wasnt the only
one booing Jeremy Corbyn
26 June 2017 17:07

Lucy Vickery
Spectator competition winners: Alex Salmond/has been
grilled, gutted and gammoned: clerihews about
contemporary politicians
25 June 2017 9:45

David Butterfield
Why The Spectator is the worlds oldest weekly magazine
24 June 2017 15:48

LATEST FROM APOLLO

The International Art Magazine

My life has always been about painting


by Imelda Barnard

A token of love from a besotted prince


by Susan Moore

Sadiq Khan launches London Borough of Culture competition


by Art news daily

At last, some welcome relief for regional museums


by Alistair Brown

Turners golden landscape and other auction highlights


by Susan Moore
EDITORS CHOICE

Lucian Freud was quite wrong to think Raphael dull he was a genius

The grandes dames of the Grand Canal


Meet the composer who licked Beethovens carpet

Eat whales - not insects - if you want to save the planet


ABOUT
Contact Us

FAQs

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Jobs and Vacancies

MORE FROM THE SPECTATOR


The Spectator Australia

Apollo Magazine

The Spectator Shop

ADVERTISING
Classifieds

SUBSCRIBE
Club

Email Newsletters

The Spectator, 22 Old Queen Street, London, SW1H 9HP


Site designed and built by interconnect/it

You might also like