Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 36, No. 4 (October-December 2016) 661
Cone beam computed tomography
METHODOLOGY and analyzed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM, New York, NY)
in view of the objectives of the study, using descriptive
A self-administered anonymous questionnaire con-
analysis.
sisting of 20 multiple choice questions was designed and
administered voluntarily to 350 (275 female, 75 male) RESULTS
dentists at Armed Force Institute of Dentistry. Dentists
Among the total sample of 350 dentists, 75 (21.4%)
were divided according to their academic qualification
were males and 275(78.6%) were females. Final year
into final year students, graduates, postgraduates and
students were 15 (4.3%), Postgraduate dentists were
dentists with postgraduate qualification.
120 (34.3%) and graduates were 205 (58.6%) and 10
There was no compulsion for answering the ques- (2.9%) were postgraduate residents. Details of results
tionnaire and it was ensured to dentists that results can be seen in Table 1-7 and Fig 1-2.
of the present study will not be used for reporting any
personal information about individuals but used only TABLE 1: DATA REGARDING THE NUMBER OF
for dental societys educational purpose. In addition to DENTISTS/STUDENTS USING DIGITAL
collecting demographic information, the questionnaire IMAGING TECHNIQUES
gauged the respondents' general awareness, knowledge
and attitude towards CBCT. It can be broadly classified Do you use digi-
into four parts. (Fig. 1) tal imaging tech-
niques for taking
First part included Demographic details of the den- radiographs
tist regarding the gender and academic qualification No Yes Total
(Question 1, 2). Second part was related to dentists
Educa- Final year 40 15 55
attitude assessment toward digital imaging (Question tion
3 to 7). Third part depicted evaluation of dentists Postgradu- 0 120 120
level ate dentists
knowledge toward CBCT usage (Question 8 to 15) and
4th part included assessment of dentists attitude to- BDS 5 160 165
ward CBCT in their future dental career (Question 16 MDS/FCPS 0 10 10
to 20). The data collected were sorted out, tabulated, Total 45 305 350
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 36, No. 4 (October-December 2016) 662
Cone beam computed tomography
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 36, No. 4 (October-December 2016) 663
Cone beam computed tomography
In the present study, statistically significant num- One of the reasons of lack of awareness is that CBCT
ber of dentists (87.1%) prefers to use digital imaging is not included in dental curriculum and faculty also
radiography over conventional radiography. Graduates does not provide adequate training as shown by our
(52.5%) and postgraduates (39.3%) were the top ones to results. Dentists (48.6%) responded that their faculty
use CBCT showing their keen interest in this upcoming did not provide adequate education regarding CBCT.
technology. According to Wenzel and Moystad7 only Similar reason was reported by Aditya et al.12
14% of the dentists prefer to use digital radiography.
A slight higher percentage (67%) of digital imaging Another study done in Turkey by Kamburoglu et
radiography users was seen in the study conducted al advocated that efforts should be made to increase
by Do leko_glu et al.8 The most common reason of not students understanding regarding CBCT and that
using CBCT reported by non-users (12.8%) was the cost, the dental school curriculum should dedicate more
higher than conventional radiography. Same results curriculum time to this new technology.13
were reported by other authors.9,10 Majority of dental health professionals (92.9%) was
Although a great number of dentists (77.1%) pre- willing to obtain updated information regarding digital
ferred CBCT over conventional CT for their patients to radiography showing their thirst of getting modernized
undergo 3D imaging, 28.6% of dentists failed to explain information related to this evolving technology. There-
the advantage of CBCT over CT. These results shows fore, it is recommended that refresher programs must
lack of awareness and practical education regarding be held for dentists to increase their awareness toward
CBCT in institutions and few dentists also pointed cone beam computed tomography.
out the reason of non-availability of CBCT in dental
institutes. Reddy et al10 carried out a study to evaluate CONCLUSION
knowledge and attitude of dental fraternity towards Cone beam computed tomography is the latest
CBCT in South India and found that there was low advancement in the field of dentistry and is becoming
awareness amongst the dentists regarding use of CBCT. a right hand tool among dental practitioners. Results
The possible causes for low awareness mentioned in of this research showed that there is a great need of
the study were lack of availability of CBCT in India as conducting different dental education programs for
well as non-inclusion of CBCT training during dental awareness of dentists regarding CBCT as well as it
education. should be included in the curriculum for undergraduate
students. By improving this, the dentists would be able
Literature shows wide range of uses of cone beam to do their practice in a more efficient way and in return
computerized tomography.11,12 Most of the responses it will be of great benefit for the patients as well.
regarding the indications of CBCT were only in favor
of implant dentistry (55.7%). The responses to the REFERENCES
above questions highlighted the absence of complete 1 Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A
and precise information regarding CBCT. Technol- new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the
ogy can only be a part of practice when there is an cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;
8:1558-64.
understanding of the technical nuisances related
to it. Thus, efforts should be carried out in order to 2 Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. De-
fulfill the gap of knowledge to make dental future velopment of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for
dental use. Dentomaxillo fac Radiol 1999; 28:245-48.
more successful.
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 36, No. 4 (October-December 2016) 664
Cone beam computed tomography
3 Parashar V, Whaites E, Monsour P, Chaudhry J, Geist JR. Cone among Turkish dentists. Dentomaxillo fac Radiol. 2011 Sep;
Beam Computed Tomography in Dental Education: A Survey 40(6):379-84.
of US, UK, and Australian Dental Schools. J Dent Educ. 2012
Nov; 76 (11):1443-47. 9 Brian JN, Williamson GF. Digital radiography in dentistry:
a survey of Indiana dentists. Dentomaxillo fac Radiol. 2007;
4 The Assessment of Dentists Knowledge Regarding Indications 36:18-23.
of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Qazvin, Iran. Biotech
Health Sci. 2015 February; 2(1): 25815. 10 Reddy RS, Kiran CS, Ramesh T, Kumar BN, Naik RM, Ramya
K. Knowledge and attitude of dental fraternity towards cone
5 K Kamburoglu, S Kursun, ZZ Akarslan. Dental students beam computed tomography in south India A questionnaire
knowledge and attitudes towards cone beam computed tomogra- study. Indian J Dent 2012; 4:88-94.
phy in Turkey. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2011; 40: 439-43.
11 Miles DA. The future of dental and maxillofacial imaging. Dent
6 A Bhagat, P Nagrik, B Yemle. Dental Practitioners Aware- Clin North Am 2008; 52:917-28.
ness, Knowledge and Attitude towards Cone Beam Computed
Tomography. IOSR. Journal of Dental and Medical. Sciences 12 Aditya A, Lele S, Aditya P. Current status of knowledge, atti-
(IOSR-JDMS), 2016 Mar; 15(3): 33-37. tude, and perspective of dental practitioners toward cone beam
computed tomography: A survey. J Oral Maxillo fac Radiol 2015;
7 Wenzel A, Mystad A. Decision criteria and characteristics of 3:54-57.
Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radi-
ography. Dentomaxillo fac Radiol. 2001; 30:197-202. 13 Kamburoglu K, Kursun S, Akarslan ZZ. Dental students knowl-
edge and attitudes towards cone beam computed tomography
8 Do leko_glu S, Fisekc io_glu E, _Ilguy M, _Ilgu y D. The usage in Turkey. Dentomaxillo fac Radiol 2011; 40:439-43.
of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography
CONTRIBUTIONS BY AUTHORS
1 Tabasum Farhan: Data collection
2 Hira Zaman: Statistical analysis, literature review, article writing
3 Maria Shakoor: Topic selection, literature review
4 Col Mubashir Sharif: Supervision, final review
Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal Vol 36, No. 4 (October-December 2016) 665
Copyright of Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal is the property of Asianet-Pakistan and its
content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use.