You are on page 1of 17

Your trial period for SPSS for Windows will expire in 14 days.

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=perseks pendor pekor pempenseks umre JK pengre ling sumin

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=pendor pekor pempenseks umre JK pengre ling sumin BY perseks
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN

/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Notes

Output Created 12-Jun-2016 19:12:14

Comments

Input Active Dataset DataSet0

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 136

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on all


the cases with valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in each table.

Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=pendor pekor pempenseks
umre JK pengre ling sumin BY perseks
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW COLUMN
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.047

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.047

Dimensions Requested 2

Cells Available 174762

[DataSet0]
Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pendidikan orang tua * perilaku


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
seksual remaja

pekerjaan orang tua * perilaku


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
seksual remaja

pemberian pendidikan seks *


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
perilaku seksual remaja

umur remaja * perilaku seksual


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
remaja

jenis kelamin * perilaku seksual


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
remaja

pengetahuan remaja * perilaku


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
seksual remaja

lingkungan * perilaku seksual


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
remaja

sumber informasi * perilaku


136 100.0% 0 .0% 136 100.0%
seksual remaja

sumber informasi * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

sumber informasi terpapar Count 14 46 60

% within sumber informasi 23.3% 76.7% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


25.9% 56.1% 44.1%
remaja

tidak terpapar Count 40 36 76

% within sumber informasi 52.6% 47.4% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


74.1% 43.9% 55.9%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within sumber informasi 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 12.022a 1 .001

Continuity Correctionb 10.829 1 .001

Likelihood Ratio 12.389 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .001 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 11.934 1 .001

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.82.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for sumber


informasi (terpapar / tidak .274 .130 .579
terpapar)

For cohort perilaku seksual


.443 .267 .735
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.619 1.229 2.131
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136


lingkungan * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

lingkungan bergaul dengan orang dewasa Count 15 34 49

% within lingkungan 30.6% 69.4% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


27.8% 41.5% 36.0%
remaja

bergaul dengan teman sebaya Count 39 48 87

% within lingkungan 44.8% 55.2% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


72.2% 58.5% 64.0%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within lingkungan 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 2.646a 1 .104

Continuity Correctionb 2.085 1 .149

Likelihood Ratio 2.691 1 .101

Fisher's Exact Test .144 .074

Linear-by-Linear Association 2.626 1 .105

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.46.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for lingkungan


(bergaul dengan orang dewasa
.543 .259 1.138
/ bergaul dengan teman
sebaya)

For cohort perilaku seksual


.683 .422 1.105
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.258 .964 1.640
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136

pengetahuan remaja * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

pengetahuan remaja kurang baik Count 32 22 54

% within pengetahuan remaja 59.3% 40.7% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


59.3% 26.8% 39.7%
remaja

baik Count 22 60 82

% within pengetahuan remaja 26.8% 73.2% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


40.7% 73.2% 60.3%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within pengetahuan remaja 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 14.303a 1 .000

Continuity Correctionb 12.981 1 .000

Likelihood Ratio 14.358 1 .000

Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000

Linear-by-Linear Association 14.198 1 .000

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.44.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pengetahuan


3.967 1.911 8.234
remaja (kurang baik / baik)

For cohort perilaku seksual


2.209 1.451 3.363
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


.557 .393 .788
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136


jenis kelamin * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

jenis kelamin laki-laki Count 27 20 47

% within jenis kelamin 57.4% 42.6% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


50.0% 24.4% 34.6%
remaja

perempuan Count 27 62 89

% within jenis kelamin 30.3% 69.7% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


50.0% 75.6% 65.4%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within jenis kelamin 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.442a 1 .002

Continuity Correctionb 8.344 1 .004

Likelihood Ratio 9.383 1 .002

Fisher's Exact Test .003 .002

Linear-by-Linear Association 9.373 1 .002

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18.66.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for jenis kelamin


3.100 1.488 6.458
(laki-laki / perempuan)

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.894 1.270 2.824
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


.611 .426 .875
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136

umur remaja * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

umur remaja remaja awal Count 23 36 59

% within umur remaja 39.0% 61.0% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


42.6% 43.9% 43.4%
remaja

remaja akhir Count 31 46 77

% within umur remaja 40.3% 59.7% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


57.4% 56.1% 56.6%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within umur remaja 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square .023a 1 .880

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .023 1 .880

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .511

Linear-by-Linear Association .023 1 .881

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.43.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for umur remaja


.948 .474 1.897
(remaja awal / remaja akhir)

For cohort perilaku seksual


.968 .637 1.473
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.021 .776 1.344
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136


pemberian pendidikan seks * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

pemberian pendidikan seks tidak di berikan Count 19 21 40

% within pemberian pendidikan


47.5% 52.5% 100.0%
seks

% within perilaku seksual


35.2% 25.6% 29.4%
remaja

di berikan Count 35 61 96

% within pemberian pendidikan


36.5% 63.5% 100.0%
seks

% within perilaku seksual


64.8% 74.4% 70.6%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within pemberian pendidikan


39.7% 60.3% 100.0%
seks

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.438a 1 .230

Continuity Correctionb 1.014 1 .314

Likelihood Ratio 1.424 1 .233

Fisher's Exact Test .253 .157

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.427 1 .232

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.88.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pemberian


pendidikan seks (tidak di 1.577 .747 3.328
berikan / di berikan)

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.303 .857 1.982
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


.826 .593 1.151
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136

pekerjaan orang tua * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

pekerjaan orang tua tidak bekerja Count 31 26 57

% within pekerjaan orang tua 54.4% 45.6% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


57.4% 31.7% 41.9%
remaja

bekerja Count 23 56 79

% within pekerjaan orang tua 29.1% 70.9% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


42.6% 68.3% 58.1%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within pekerjaan orang tua 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.833a 1 .003

Continuity Correctionb 7.809 1 .005

Likelihood Ratio 8.850 1 .003

Fisher's Exact Test .004 .003

Linear-by-Linear Association 8.768 1 .003

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 22.63.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pekerjaan orang


2.903 1.424 5.918
tua (tidak bekerja / bekerja)

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.868 1.230 2.838
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


.643 .469 .883
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136


pendidikan orang tua * perilaku seksual remaja

Crosstab

perilaku seksual remaja

tidak baik baik Total

pendidikan orang tua pendidikan rendah Count 25 30 55

% within pendidikan orang tua 45.5% 54.5% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


46.3% 36.6% 40.4%
remaja

pendidikan tinggi Count 29 52 81

% within pendidikan orang tua 35.8% 64.2% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


53.7% 63.4% 59.6%
remaja

Total Count 54 82 136

% within pendidikan orang tua 39.7% 60.3% 100.0%

% within perilaku seksual


100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
remaja

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.275a 1 .259

Continuity Correctionb .903 1 .342

Likelihood Ratio 1.271 1 .260

Fisher's Exact Test .287 .171

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.265 1 .261

N of Valid Casesb 136

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.84.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table


Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pendidikan


orang tua (pendidikan rendah / 1.494 .743 3.005
pendidikan tinggi)

For cohort perilaku seksual


1.270 .842 1.915
remaja = tidak baik

For cohort perilaku seksual


.850 .635 1.137
remaja = baik

N of Valid Cases 136


Frequencies

Notes

Output Created 12-Jun-2016 19:11:03

Comments

Input Active Dataset DataSet0

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 136

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid


data.

Syntax FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=perseks


pendor pekor pempenseks umre JK pengre
ling sumin
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.000

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.000

[DataSet0]

Statistics

perilaku pendidikan pekerjaan pemberian umur jenis pengetahuan sumber


seksual remaja orang tua orang tua pendidikan seks remaja kelamin remaja lingkungan informasi

N Valid 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 136

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

perilaku seksual remaja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid tidak baik 54 39.7 39.7 39.7

Baik 82 60.3 60.3 100.0


perilaku seksual remaja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid tidak baik 54 39.7 39.7 39.7

Baik 82 60.3 60.3 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

pendidikan orang tua

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid pendidikan rendah 55 40.4 40.4 40.4

pendidikan tinggi 81 59.6 59.6 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

pekerjaan orang tua

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid tidak bekerja 57 41.9 41.9 41.9

bekerja 79 58.1 58.1 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

pemberian pendidikan seks

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid tidak di berikan 40 29.4 29.4 29.4

di berikan 96 70.6 70.6 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

umur remaja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid remaja awal 59 43.4 43.4 43.4

remaja akhir 77 56.6 56.6 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0


jenis kelamin

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid laki-laki 47 34.6 34.6 34.6

perempuan 89 65.4 65.4 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan remaja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid kurang baik 54 39.7 39.7 39.7

baik 82 60.3 60.3 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

lingkungan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid bergaul dengan orang dewasa 49 36.0 36.0 36.0

bergaul dengan teman sebaya 87 64.0 64.0 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

sumber informasi

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid terpapar 60 44.1 44.4 44.4

tidak terpapar 76 55.9 55.6 100.0

Total 136 100.0 100.0

Total 136 100.0