Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Education Program
Marline Faustin
Abstract
Clinical problem: Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of hospitalization in the United States
(Deeka, Skouri, & Noureddine, 2016). Patients with chronic HF have a higher rate of
in heart failure patients > 60 years old. PubMed, CINAHL, American Heart Association and the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid were accessed to obtain randomized clinical trials (RCT) and
clinical guidelines. Education, heart failure, readmission, adults, post-hospitalization were key
Results: The American Heart Association provided a program that could reduce 30-day
readmissions to meet the reimbursement measures of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid
services (American Heart Association, 2016). Balaban et al. (2015) showed that the use of
patient navigators (PN), who provided a 30-day post-discharge education to HF patients >60
years old, had a statistically significant 4.1% decrease in hospital readmissions (CI=95%, 0.2-8,
95%,4.4-19, p<.05) for patients who werent provided PNs post-discharge. Basoor et al. (2013)
showed that a checklist that provided effective discharge education decreased the number of
readmissions in patients who were exposed to the checklist than patients who werent (p <.001).
Conclusion: The literature showed that for the completion of the controlled trials there was a
mild reduction in readmission rates. More research is needed to determine if there is truly a
Education Program
The leading cause of hospitalization in the United States (U.S.) and other developing
countries, among adults greater than 60 years old is heart failure (HF) (Deeka, Skouri, &
Noureddine, 2016). In reviewing the quality of care of patients with HF, the key performance
measure is the readmission rates of these patients with this chronic condition (Deeka et al.,
2016). The Affordable Care Act (ACA) added a section to the Social Security Act, which
developed a Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP). The ACA required the Center
for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to hold their reimbursements for hospitals with
excessive hospital readmissions, which included HF patients (Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services, 2016). The American Heart Association created Get With The Guidelines-
Heart Failure, as an in-hospital program to decrease 30-day readmissions, helping hospitals meet
the HRRP criteria (American Heart Association, 2016). The purpose of this paper is to discuss
this population. In adult patients with HF, how does a post-hospitalization education program,
compared to no education program, affect hospital readmission rates over three months?
Literature Search
The databases that were accessed to obtain clinical trials and guidelines about reducing
HF readmissions were PubMed, the American Heart Association and the Center for Medicare
and Medicaid Services. Education, heart failure, readmission, adults, post-hospitalization, were
key search terms used to find the supporting literature. The years the literature was searched for
Literature Review
HF readmission rates, three randomized control trials (RCT) were used. Balaban et al. (2015)
conducted an RCT, in which patients were randomly assigned using a computer algorithm to
workers) would reduce hospital readmissions among high risk, low socioeconomic patients.
There was 585 intervention group patients and 925 control group patients. The intervention
group was exposed to PNs that provided coaching and assistance through a transition from
hospital to home by making hospital visits and weekly telephone outreach, supporting patients
symptom management. The control group was exposed to the standard outpatient and inpatient
care. The outcomes of this study were evaluated as an entire cohort, then stratified by patients
age >60 years old or <60 years old. Patients in the intervention group >60 years old showed a
statistically significant 4.1% decrease in hospital readmissions (CI=95%, 0.2-8, p<.05) and an
significant 11.8 % increase in hospital readmission (CI= 95%,4.4-19, p<.05) with no change in
30-day outpatient follow-up. Some strengths of this study were that the participants were
randomized, random assignment was concealed from the individuals who enrolled as patients for
the study, the rationale for participant attrition was explained, the patients were analyzed in the
groups they were randomly assigned, the patients in each group were similar in demographics
and clinical variables, and there was a large sample size. Some weaknesses of the study were the
30-day post-discharge time frame, which was a short amount of time to observe a change in
REDUCING READMISSIONS FOR HEART FAILURE PATIENTS 5
patients with complex health issues, the patient navigators were not blinded to the study, and the
validity and reliability of the instruments used to measure the study were not given.
Basoor et al. (2013) evaluated the use of a checklist that provided effective discharge
instructions, appropriate dose uptitration, education regarding HF monitoring, and strict follow-
up to decrease readmissions for HF patients. The design of the study was an RCT. There was a
control and 48 participants randomized to the intervention group. The intervention group was
appropriate dose uptitration, education regarding HF monitoring, and strict follow-up guidelines.
The control group was exposed to the standard post-discharge guidelines. The outcomes of the
study resulted in decreased readmissions. The result showed a statistical significance (p <.001).
At 30 days, the intervention group had fewer readmissions (6%) than the control group (19%).
At six months, the intervention group had fewer readmissions (23%) than the control group
(42%) (p<.001). The use of a post-discharge checklist was associated with decreased readmission
rates for patients admitted with HF. Weaknesses of the study included the small sample size
which made it less representative of the patient population and the subjects were not blinded to
the study. Some strengths of this study were the measure of readmission outcomes was valid, the
randomization of both control and intervention groups, the random assignment was concealed
from the patients, patients in the study had similar demographics and baseline clinical variables,
the control was appropriate for the study, a rationale was provided as to why participants were
not able to complete the study, and the six months follow-up was enough time to evaluate the
Yu et al. (2015), designed a single-centered, RCT of transition care (TC) versus usual
care (UC) to examine the effects of nurse-implemented transitional care (TC) upon readmission
rates. There was a total of 178 chronic HF participants over the age of 60; 88 participants
randomized to the control group, and 90 participants randomized to the intervention group. The
control group was exposed to the usual inpatient care (UC), while the intervention group
received pre-discharged visits, two home visits and phone calls to provide education, self-care,
and support over a nine-month period. Thirty individuals did not complete the study with a
higher number of attrition in the UC group. The study results showed fewer readmission rates at
six weeks (p=.048). Strengths of the study included, patients randomly assigned to an
intervention and a control group, a rationale was given for those who did not complete the study,
follow-up assessments were conducted over nine months, which was long enough to examine the
effects of the intervention, the control group was appropriate for the study, the subjects were
analyzed in the groups they were randomly assigned, and all subjects of both groups were similar
in demographics and baseline clinical variables. Some weaknesses that the study had were nurses
who implemented the care were not blind to the study, the study was a single centered RCT, and
the validity and reliability of the instruments used to measure the study were unclear.
Synthesis
Balaban et al. (2015) showed that a post-discharge education program involving PNs for
HF patients resulted in fewer readmissions for patients that were > 60 years old (p<.05). Basoor
et al. (2013) demonstrated that a post-discharge checklist was associated with decrease
readmission rates in HF patients in the intervention groups (p<.001). Finally, Yu et al. (2015)
discovered that patients who were exposed to nurse-implemented transitional care only had
The research shows that the use of a post-hospitalization program does have an effect
upon reducing readmission rates in patients with HF > 60 years old. Each study demonstrates a
studies showed a mild reduction of readmission in HF patients. In the study Balaban et al.
conducted, there was the largest difference in the control group and intervention group and
largest sample size compared to the other two studies conducted by Yu et al. (2015) and Basoor
et al. (2013). More research is needed to determine if there is truly a positive correlation between
a post-hospitalization program and HF readmission rates. Lastly, the way the program is
delivered may also be a factor in how effective it is in reducing the rate of readmissions in HF
Clinical Recommendation
Clinical guidelines for treatment of HF that include strategic education do not yet exist.
The AHA created the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure program to ensure full
reimbursement for hospitals. This AHA program aimed to improve care by promoting consistent
adherence to the latest scientific treatment guidelines which included access to the most up-to-
date research, patient education resources, and clinical tools (American Heart Association,
2016). Numerous studies have shown that the AHA Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure
program has shown a significant improvement in patient outcome. One of these outcomes was a
measures the number of readmissions within 30-days of discharge for patients being admitted
with the same diagnosis like HF, pneumonia and myocardial infarction (Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, 2016). A clinical guideline and this program would drive practice in very
REDUCING READMISSIONS FOR HEART FAILURE PATIENTS 8
HF patients.
REDUCING READMISSIONS FOR HEART FAILURE PATIENTS 9
Reference
American Heart Association (2016). Get with the guidelines-heart failure overview. Retrieved
from
http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Professional/GetWithTheGuidelines/GetWithTheGui
delines-HF/Get-With-The-Guidelines-Heart-Failure-
Overview_UCM_307806_Article.jsp#.WCgHRy0rLIU
Balaban, R. B., Galbraith, A. A., Burns, M. E., Vialle-Valentin, C. E., Larochelle, M. R., &
Basoor, A., Doshi, N. C., Cotant, J. F., Saleh, T., Todorov, M., Choksi...Halabi, A. R. (2013).
Decreased readmissions and improved quality of care with the use of an inexpensive
10.1111/chf.12031
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2016). Readmissions reduction program (HRRP).
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-
payment/acuteinpatientpps/readmissions-reduction-program.html
Deeka, H., Skouri, H., & Noureddine, S. (2016). Readmission rates and related factors in
Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., Stewart S., Thompson, D. R., Choi, K. C., & Yu, C. M. (2015).
Effect of nurse-implemented transitional care for Chinese individuals with chronic heart
failure in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Geriatric