Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
A research on developing the laws of technical evolution has been conducted by the author since 1973.
Principal theoretical statements were formulated in 1984. As a foundation for the research, the laws of
technical system evolution were selected which were originally developed by Genrich Altshuller, the author
of the Theory of Inventve Problem Solving. (1), (2).
In addition to Altshuller, the following researchers contributed to study and developments the laws of
technical system evolution: B. Goldowsky; B. Zlotin and A. Zusmann; Yu. Salamatov and I. Kondrakov; S.
Litvin and V. Guerassimov; I. Vertkin; G. Ivanov; V. Petrov and E. Zlotin; M. Rubin; V. Fey; A. Pinyaev; I.
Zakharov; V. Dubrov; G. Frenklakh; G. Ezersky; A. Bystritsky (5-40).
Form our point of view, until now, no unified vision of the laws of technical system evolution
was available. All the above-mentioned authors presented generic and specific aspects of the laws.
There are several systems available which describe the laws of technical system evolution. In our
opinion, most successful are the systems developed by G. Altshuller; B. Zlotin and A. Zusmann;
and Yu. Salamatov.
This paper presents a system of laws, which, in the opinion of the author, makes it possible to
perform forecast of technology evolution more thoroughly and easier.
2. SYSTEM OF LAWS
2.1.General information
Evolution of all objects of material world including technological objects is governed by certain
laws. Among the most general laws are the laws of dialectics (the law of the unity
(interpenetration) of opposites; the law of transformation of quantity into quality; and the law of the
negation of the negation).
A system of the laws of technical system evolution must have three levels: demands,
functions and systems.
A hierarchy of the system of the laws developed by the authors is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Law of the Unity (Interpenetration) of Opposites serves as a source for creation of all
objects including material objects, where technical systems belong. The law defines one of the key
TRIZ concepts: contradiction.
The Law of Transformation of Quantity into Quality defines a general mechanism of
evolution. Quantitative changes in a system take place continuously accordingly the S-curve of
evolution. When a certain limit of quantitative evolution is reached, a system experiences
qualitative changes. Further evolution of the system starts according to a new S-curve. During this
process, quantitative changes take place continuously whereas quantitative changes take place in
discrete steps.
To imagine a full diagram of evolution of technical systems, it is necessary to take into account a
so-called line of life of a technical system, a regularity defined by Genrich Altshuller (1, pp. 113-
119).
An essence of the Law of the Negation of the Negation is that a process of progressive
evolution consists of a series of relative repetitions, as if going through the same phases again and
again. However, each repetition takes place at a higher level of evolution by using new elements,
materials, and technologies. We can say, that in this case we have a spiral-shaped evolution. For
example, fashion design is the most obvious example of spiral-shaped evolution.
Regularities of poly- and mono-functionality are based on the mechanisms of expansion and
convolution of functions.
The laws of function evolution are similar to the laws of demand evolution, however they
should be regarded with respect to functionality: making functions more ideal (idealization of
functions); growth of the degree of function dynamics; coordination of functions; transition to
mono or poly-functionality.
Idealization of functions is achieved by increasing the degree of function dynamics, then by
transition to mono- or poly-functionality and by further coordination of functions.
Regularities of expansion and convolution of functions are presented by the author in (11,12).
Systemity
Figure 2
Functional completeness must ensure delivery of a general goal of the system and correspond
to the functional purpose of the system, and in the first place, to the main function of the system.
This means that all principal and auxiliary functions must be fulfilled as well.
Structural completeness of the system must provide presence of all required elements and links
in the system.
A main function of the system is provided by a main working unit of the system. Energy
supply and control are the principal functions of the system. These functions are provided by an
energy source and a system comprising a control unit. Most important among auxiliary functions
are conversion and transport of energy and information.
As a conclusion, the law of system completeness describes the least but necessary set of system
parts that provide minimal working behavior of the system. In general, the following parts are
necessary:
Working unit.
Energy source and converter.
A system of control (control unit).
Energy transformation can be provided, for instance, by an engine whereas energy and
information transport can be provided by transmission (links).
Also, a general case requires the following system parts: the working unit; energy to provide
the working tool; and a system for control over the working unit.
Formulation and recognition of links is conducted with the use of special tables and in a
sequence, which were developed by the author.
Of Structure Of Control
MONO BI POLY
Substance-Field
Transition of a
Increase of the
Information
Interactions
Increase of
Saturation
Microlevel
System to
Degree of
CONVOLUTION
Figure 3
In turn, general direction of making system more ideal is defined by the laws of Increase of the
degree of system dynamics; Coordination; and Transition of a system to a supersystem.
An Absolutely Ideal System (which is impossible) is defined as a system which does not exist
but all possible functions are delivered at the required moment of time in the required space with
100% of effectiveness, whereas there is no consumption of power, material, energy and
information. Therefore, Absolutely Ideal System must deliver an infinite number of functions, at the
required moment of time and in the required space without producing negative effects and the
required expenses do not exist. The use of information is not regarded as expenses in case if
information is available for free. A more ideal system always uses more free of charge information.
A degree of ideality can be expressed as:1
Where: I the degree of ideality;
F i F a function delivered of a positive effect;
I= i =1
0
= P negative effect, expenses;
P
j =1
j
i a number of variable F;
j a number of variable P.
1
This formula (in more simplified form) was first proposed by Boris Goldovsky in 1974.
Vladimir Petrov, 2001
The Laws of System Evolution 7/18
Methods of Idealization
These methods of idealization will be presented by the laws of Increase of the degree of system
dynamics; Coordination; and Transition of a system to a supersystem.
Coordination of systems
Coordination of subsystems Coordination of external
Coordination of supersystems environment
When coordinating a system, first its structure should be coordinated. By structure we will
understand form, location and interaction of separate elements.
A structure of a system is defined by its elements and links. They can be:
Material Informational
Energetic
System terms of a structure, its elements and links, as well as their types (material, energy,
information) are valid for subsystems, supersystem and external environment.
Parameters can be:
Technical Social
Ergonomic Political
Economic Etc.
Ecological
Esthetic
Specific regularities of coordination of structure are available. For instance, elements and
materials, shapes, links, parameters (in particular, their rhythms)
Figure 4
The law of increasing the degree of dynamics includes the following sub-laws:
A law of transition of a system structure from macro- to microlevel.
The law of increase of degree of substance-field interactions.
The law of increase of information concentration.
Change of a scale
Supersystem
System
Subsystem
Substance
Figure 5
Supersystem
Increase of the degree of
energy saturation of a
Transition to CPM
Increase of specific
a higher degree of
fragmentation
voidness
control
system
System
Subsystem
Substance
Figure 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Aero-
Gel Liquid Gas Field
sol
Figure 7
The working unit (tool) can be monolithic or non-monolithic (consisting of several parts). A
material of the tool can be hard, non-hard (soft), liquid, gaseous or a physical field.
This sequence is featured by the transition from solid monolithic system (1) to entirely flexible
(elastic) object (2); to an object consisting of powder (3), to gel (4), to liquid (5), to aerosol (6), to
gas (7), and finally, to a field (8). In particular, it can be plasma.
In addition, any combination of mentioned states are possible. To raise the effectiveness of
operation, technological effects applicable to any given state can be used.
A complete diagram presenting the regularity is more complex. It includes additional transitions
from the state (1) to state (2), from (2) to (3) and transitions from states (1) and (2) to capillaries-
porous materials (CPM).
1(2) A B C D
Where:
1 - monolith in a hard state,
2 - monolith in a flexible state,
A - substance with a single cavity,
B - substance with many cavities,
C - CPM,
D - mCPM,
CPM - capillaries-porous material,
mCPM - micro-CPM.
Figure 8
Transitions from (A) to (B), from (B) (C) and from (C) to (D) are similar and are governed
by the following regularity of using cavities: 1) cavity 2) a cavity with a structure (a cavity
which has a certain structure), - 3) cavity filled with substance 4) civility filled with a
substance which can be controlled by fields with the use of various technological effects
(Figure 9)
USE OF CAVITIES
# #+S
# + S+ TE
Where:
# - structure of cavity,
S - substance,
TE - technological effect.
Figure 9
Figure 10
Mechanical
Field Displace- Vibrations
2 Friction Pressure ment Blow 2.5
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
Figure 11
Combination
Figure 11a
Electromagnetic Field
Magnetic Electric Optical
4
4.2 4.3 4.4
Figure 11b
CONVOLUTION OF FIELDS
Convolution
Figure 12
During the next phase of evolution, another field is added to the existing one. As a result, we
observe a transition from MONO-field to Bi-field. Combination of the fields of the same physical
type or of different types is possible. The fields of the same type can be identical (F1 + F1) or have
dissimilar characteristics (F1 + F1).
Similarly to combining systems, further evolution is featured by the coordination of the fields
used in a system. For instance, (F1 + F1~) is a coordination of permanent field F1 with a variable
Field F1~. Later, the fields can be replaced with a single field (MONO-field, F0). This is process is
known as convolution.
The next transition can use more than two fields thus forming a POLY-system of fields (Fig.
13).
F1 F1 + F2 F 1 + F 1' + F 2 F 1 + F 1~ + F 2 F 1 + F 1~ + F 2 + F1 + F2 + + Fn F0
Figure 13
Non- Change of
Simple Change of Coordination Forced
S-Field S-Field
S-Field of S and F S-Field
System S and F Structure
Figure 14
Mechanics
Automation
Self-evolution
Self-reproduction
Figure 15
Convolution
Figure 16
Internal areas can be used in the volume (the nested doll principle). In particular, this can
be Kisilyov tape (similarly to the Mobius tape, but in volume). This trend is shown in Fig. 17c.
Other geometric effects can be used as well.
Finally, pseudo-volumes can be used. For instance, stereoscopic images, holograms, and 3D
imaging in computer systems.
Further idealization of a system is achieved through the use of resources.
Figure 17
Use of line
Line in plane Line in volume
Line
Figure 17a
Use of plane
Figure 17b
Use of Volume
Volume Nested Doll Kisilyov Tape
Figure 17c
References
31) Ivanov G.I., The Law of Through Energy Transport, Journal of TRIZ, Angarsk Version, 1993
(Electronic Edition), pp. 48-52.
32) Bystritsky A.A., Systematics of Technical System and Technical Models, Journal of TRIZ, Angarsk
Version, 1993 (Electronic Edition), pp. 35-36.
33) Zlotin B.L. & Zusman A.V. General Laws of Evolution, Journal of TRIZ, 1/94, pp. 24-28.
34) Zakharov A.N., Towards Developing a System of Laws of Technology Evolution, Journal of TRIZ,
1/95, ( 10), pp. 19-29.
35) Pinyaev A.M., Union Under the Function Sign (A functional Approach to Amalgamation of Alternative
Systems). Journal of TRIZ, 1/95, ( 10), pp. 33-37.
36) Zakharov A.N., A Hierarchy of Systems: Upwards the stairs leading up, Journal of TRIZ, 1/96, (
11), pp. 34-39.
37) Zakharov A.N., About Unity of TRIZ Tools, Technology of Creativity, 1, 1999, pp. 19-38.
38) Salamatov Yu.P., A System of Laws of Technology Evolution (Basics of The Theory of Technical
System Evolution, http://www.triz.minsk.by/e/21101300.htm, (Second Edition, Krasnoyarsk,
INSTITUTE OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN, 1996).
39) Rubin M.S. Methods of Prediction on the basis of TRIZ, http://www.trizminsk.org/e/216002.htm.
40) Ivanov G.I. Questions of Self-organization in Technical Systems,
http://www.trizminsk.org/e/248005.htm