Republic of the Philippine

Department of Education
Region X
OZAMIZ CITY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND TRADES
Maningcol, Ozamiz City

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: CHARITY T. RESGONIA Name of Rater MARIFE P. MAGPULONG
Position: Teacher I Position: HT -1
School: OZAMIZ CITY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND TRADES Date of Review: MAY 09, 2017
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
W EI GHT
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA
RATING SCORE
Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.

Basic 1. Teac hing 1. Prepared Daily Lesson Logs June 2016- 15% 5- All DLLs had 5- Time or resources 5- Prepared 3 4 4 3.67 3.67 0.550
Education Learning (DLLs) daily including April 2017 complete parts, IMs were used to the DLLs and IMs 2 days
Services Proc ess appropriate, adequate and were exemplary maximum for the before teaching.
40% updated instructional materials 4- DLLs had 4 of the intended task or 4- A day before
for the whole school year 5 parts and IMs were purpose. teaching
more than expected 4- Time or resources 3- On the day of
Resources: 3- DLLs had 3 of the were used w ith the teaching
- DLL/DLP 5 parts and w ith IMs minimal utilization. 2- Prepared DLLs but
- Instructional Materials 2- DLLs had 2 of the 3- Time was used incomplete and not
- References/Curriculum guide 5 parts and IMs were with lack ing 1 or 2 updated
- Actual checking of DLL/DLP incomplete resources 1- No DLLs and IMs.
1- No DLL and IMs at 2- Time was used
all with lack ing 3
resources
1- Time was used
with no resources

2. Integrated effective June 2016- 10% 5- Taught all of the 5- Teaching 5- Use of 3 4 4 3.67 3.67 0.367
teaching- learning activ ities March 2017 desired learning strategies elicited differenti ated
that enabled at least 75% of competencies based 80% and above instruction was
the students in all the classes on the budget of mastery level of the utilized 5 times in a
handled to master the work . students. quarter
quarterly learning 4- Taught the 4- Elicited 76%-80% 4- Use of
competencies desired mastery level of the differenti ated
competenc ies with1 students. instruction was
missed. 3- Elicited 75% - utilized 4 times in a
3- W ith 2 or 3 mastery level quarter
competenc ies 2- Elicited 65% - 69% 3- 3 times in a
missed. mastery level quarter
2- W ith 4 to 5 1- Elicited 64% and 2- 2 times in a
competenc ies missed below mastery level quarter
1- W ith more than 5 1- Once in a quarter
competenc ies missed
to be taught.

3- Checked attendance of June 2016- 15% 5- At least 10 5- Attendance 5- Attendance 5 4 5 4.67 4.67 0.700
students in a regular basis April 2017 School Forms 2 (SF 2) checking was 100% check ing was done in
reflecting student's sytematically carried the morning and in
monthly attendance out the afternoon
for the whole SY 4- 95% - 99% 4- Attendance
2016-2017. systematically carried check ing was done
4- 8 to 9 for the out once a day
whole SY 2016 - 3- 90%b- 94% 3- Attendance
2017. systematically carried check ing was done
3- 6 to 7 for the out thrice in a week
whole SY 2016 - 2- 85% - 89% 2- Attendance
2017. systematically carried check ing was done
out. twice a week
1- 80% and below 1- Attendance
check ing was done
once a week

2. Students' 1. M onitored, evaluated and June 2016- 10% 5- Learning 5- Class Record (CR) 5- Learning 5 4 5 4.67 4.67 0.467
Learning maintained students' progress April 2017 assessment reflected 100% assessment
Outcomes in all rating periods for the ev idences duly students' ratings in conducted as
30% whole School Year 2016-2017 accomplished: all quarters witn the scheduled
-Test result follow ing -Pre-test
- eClass Record components: -Quarterly exams
-Test Questions -Written works -Post test
-Table of -Performance task s 4- Conduc ted 2 days
specifications -Quarterly after the schedule
assessments 3- Conduc ted a week
4- 3 of the evidences 4- Reflected 80%- after the schedule
were present 98% 2- Conduc ted two
3- 2 of the evidences 3- Reflected 80%- weeks after the
2- 1 of the evidences 89% schedule
1- No evidence at all 2- Reflected 70%- 1- F ailed to conduct
79%
1- No class record

2. Attained 75% MPS and June 2016- 10% 5- Complete 5- Test results 5- Quarterly exam 5 4 5 4.67 4.67 0.467
above of students' April 2017 compilation of showed 75% and results were av ailable
performance level in all subject quarterly exam above MPS a week after the exam
areas handled during the results for easy 4- Test results 4- Quarterly exam
S chool Year 2016-2017. verification showed 65%- 74% results were av ailable
4- Compilation MPS 2 weeks after the
lacked 1 of the 3- Test results exam
quarterly exam showed 60%- 64% 3- Quarterly exam
results MPS results were av ailable
3- Compilation 2- Test results 3 weeks after the
lacked 2 of the showed 51%- 59% exam
quarterly exam MPS 2- Quarterly exam
results 1- Test results results were av ailable
2- Compilation showed 50% and a month after the
lacked 3 of the below MPS exam
quarterly exam rsults 1- No available test
1- No quarterly exam results at all
results were
compiled

3. Ensured 85% students' April 2017 10% 5- At least 5 grading 5- 95- 100% of 5- Reinforcement 5 3 3 3.67 3.67 0.367
promotion in all subject areas sheets with complete students in the activity was given to
handled for the School Year grade entries (1st to subjects taught were those at risk of failing
2016-2017 4th quarters with promoted once a month
final grades) 4- 90% -94% of the 4- Reinforcement
4- 4 grading sheets students were activity was given to
with complete promoted those at risk of failing
entries 3- 85% -89% of the before the exam
3- 3 grading sheets students were 3- Reinforcement
with complete grade promoted activity was given to
entries 2- 75% -84% of the those at risk of failing
2- 2 grading sheets students were after the exam
with complete grade promoted 2- Reinforcement
entries 1- Below 75% of the activity was given to
1. 1 or no grading students were those at risk of failing
sheets promoted once in every two
quarters
1- No reinforcement
activity was
conducted

3. Community 1. Conference w ith parents of June 2016- 5% 5- Conference record 5- 95% conference 5- Conference with 5 3 5 4.33 4.33 0.217
Involvement learners who need academic April 2017 supported by : with succesfull parent done every
15% monitoring/follow-up/habitual -Attendance record interv entions month or every
absenteeism within rating -Agreement with 4- 85%-94% quarter
period. parents accomplishment of 4- Conference done
- Picture during set visits/conference every 4 months
conference with partial success 3- Conference done
4- Lacked 1 of the of the interv entions by semester
ev idences 3- 75%-84% 2- Conference done
3- Lacked 2 of the accomplishment end of the school year
ev idences conference w ith 1- No conference
2- Lacked 3 of the unsuccessful conducted
ev idences interv ention
1- No evidence at all 2- Complied 65%-
74% conference
1- No conference
conducted

2. Participated in events and June 2016- 5% 5- Attended 4 or more 5- 95%-100% 5- On time and 4 4 3 3.67 3.67 0.183
activities conducted in the April 2017 events/activities such support extended to regular attendance to
school and community where as but not limited to: events/activities in meetings/events
parents and other stakeholders -Brigada eskwela school and 4- Attended
are involved w ithin the school -Subayan keg Subanen community meetings/events but
year Festival 4- 90%-94% support observed to be late
- World's Teacher 's
Day extended once
- United Nations 3- 80%-89% support 3- Observed to be
-Culmination extended late twic e
program 2- 70%-79% support 2- With incomplete
4- Attended 3 extended attendance and late
events/activities 1- Below 70% once
3- Attended 2 support extended 1- With incomplete
events/activities attendance and late
2- Attended 1 twice or trice
event/activity
1- No event/activity
attended

3. Conducted PTA meetings
and conferences ev ery quarter April 2017
June 2016- 5% 5- Conducted PTA 5- Conducteed 95- 5- On time and 3 3 5 3.67 3.67 0.183
meetings and 100% PTA meetings regular on the
conferences every and conferences conduct of PTA
month. 4- Conducted 90- meetings
4- Conducted PTA 94% PTA meetings 4- Conduc ted PTA
meetings and and conferences meetings but
conferences once 3- Conducted 80%- observed to be late
ev ery 2 months. 89% PTA meeetings once
3- Conducted PTA and conferences 3- Observed to be
meetings and 2- Conducted 70%- late twic e
conferences every 79% PTA meetings 2- With incomplete
quarter. and conferences attendance and late
2- Conducted PTA 1- Conducted below once
meetings and 70% PTA meetings 1- With incomplete
conferences once and conferences attendance and late
ev ery 2 quarters. twice or trice
1- Never conducted a
PTA meeting

4. Professional 1. Participated in June 2016- 5% 5- Attended at least 5- With evidences of 5- Punctual and 3 4 5 4 4.00 0.200
Growth and trainings/seminars/work shops/ April 2017 1 regional training trainings attended: complete attendance
Development conferec es within the year in within the school -Cert. of appearance of trainings attended
15% the division,district,etc year -Cert. of 4- Complete
4- At least 2 division participation attendance but
trainings -Memo observed to be late
3- At least 5 school -Pictures once
trainings 4- Presence of 3 of 3- Complete
2- 2-3 school the evidences attendance but
trainings 3- Presence of 2 of observed to be late
1- No record of the evidences twice
trainings attended 2- Presence of 1 of 2- Incomplete
the evidences attendance and late
1- No ev idence at all once
1- Incomplete and
late twic e or more

2. Attended the monthly S LAC June 2016- 5% 5- Attended 7-8SLAC 5- 95%-100% SLA C 5- Punctuality in 5 4 5 4.67 4.67 0.233
sessions conducted in school April 2017 sessions within the outputs were attendance of all the
every month school y ear with complied 7- 8S LACs
complete attendance 4- 90%-94% SLAC 4- 5-6 SLACs
4- 5-6 S LAC sessions outputs were 3- 4-3 SLACs
3- 4-3 S LAC sessions complied 2- 2-1 SLACs
2- 2-1 S LAC sessions 3- 85%-89% SLAC 1- Late tw ice
1- No SLAC session outputs were
attended complied
2- 80%-84% SLAC
sessions were
complied
1- Below 80% of the
outputs were
complied

3. A ssisted and mentored the Within the 5% 5- A ssisted and 5- W ith evidences of 5 -Assisted and 3 4 3 3.33 3.33 0.167
BS ED Pre-service teachers from school year facilitated four (4) being a cooperating mentored the BSED
La S alle University and Misamis pre-service BSED teacher Pre- service teachers
Univ ersity who are major in teachers w ithin the -Cert. from lesson plans were
mathematics school y ear. the school checked 3 days before
4- Assisted the implementation
and facilitated four -Documentation 4 - Assisted and
(3) pre- servic e BSED during daily mentored the BSED
teachers w ithin the teachings Pre- service teachers
school y ear. - lesson plans were
3- Assisted and Documentation checked 2 days before
facilitated four (4) during post the implementation
pre-service BSED conference 3 -Assisted and
teachers w ithin the 4-Presence of mentored the BSED
school y ear. 3 of the ev idences Pre- service teachers
2- Assisted and 3- lesson plans were
facilitated four (4) Presence of 2 of the checked 1 day before
pre-service BSED evidences the implementation
teachers w ithin the 2- Presenc e of 1 of 2 - checked on the
school y ear. the evidences day of
1- No record of 1- No implementation 1-
mentoring pre- evidence at all lesson plans were not
service teac her for checked
the school year.

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENT 48.67 4.100

CHARITY T. RESGONIA MARIFE P. MAGPULONG LILIBETH Y. ABAMONGA

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Summary of Rating
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Weight per Objective Rating Score
KRA1 40% Objectives 1 15% 3.67 0.550
Objectives 2 10% 3.67 0.367
Objectives 3 15% 4.67 0.700
KRA2 30% Objectives 1 10% 4.67 0.467
Objectives 2 10% 4.67 0.467
Objectives 3 10% 3.67 0.367
KRA3 15% Objectives 1 5% 4.33 0.217
Objectives 2 5% 3.67 0.183
Objectives 3 5% 3.67 0.183
KR4 15% Objectives 1 5% 4.00 0.200
Objectives 2 5% 4.67 0.233
Objectives 3 5% 3.33 0.167
100% 100% 48.67 4.100

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs 4.1 Very Satisfactory
and Objectives

Name of Employee: CHARITY T. RESGONIA Name of Superior: MARIFE P. MAGPULONG

Signature: Signature:
Date: MAY 9, 2017 Date: MAY 9, 2017
CHARITY T. RESGONIA M ARIFE P. MAGPULONG LILIBETH Y. A BAMONGA
Ratee Rater Approv ing Authority

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND RE
Name of Employee: CHARRIE FE C. CONCEPCION
Position: Teacher I
School: OZAMIZ CITY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND TRADES
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
Basic 1. Teaching 1. Prepared Daily Lesson Logs June 2016-
Education Learning (DLLs) daily including
Services Process appropriate, adequate and
40% updated instructional materials
for the whole school year
Resources:
-DLL/DLP
-Instructional Materials
-References/Curriculum guide
-Actual checking of DLL/DLP
Republic of the Philippine
Department of Education
Region X
OZAMIZ CITY SCHOOL OF ARTS AND TRAD
Maningcol, Ozamiz City
PERFORMANC
WEIGHT
TIMELINE per KRA
Quality
15% 5- All DLLs had
April 2017 complete parts, IMs
were exemplary
4- DLLs had 4 of the
5 parts and IMs were
more than expected
3- DLLs had 3 of the
5 parts and with IMs
2- DLLs had 2 of the
5 parts and IMs were
incomplete
1- No DLL and IMs at
all
2. Integrated effective June 2016- 10% 5- Taught all of the
teaching-learning activities March 2017 desired learning
that enabled at least 75% of competencies based
the students in all the classes on the budget of
handled to master the work.
quarterly learning 4- Taught the
competencies desired
competencies with1
missed.
3- With 2 or 3
competencies
missed.
2- With 4 to 5
competencies missed
1- With more than 5
competencies missed
to be taught.

3- Checked attendance of June 2016- 15% 5- At least 10

students in a regular basis April 2017 School Forms 2 (SF2)
reflecting student's
monthly attendance
for the whole SY
2016-2017.
4- 8 to 9 for the
whole SY 2016 -
2017.
3- 6 to 7 for the
whole SY 2016 -
2017.
2. Students' 1. Monitored, evaluated and June 2016- 10% 5- Learning
Learning maintained students' progress April 2017 assessment
Outcomes in all rating periods for the evidences duly
30% whole School Year 2016-2017 accomplished:
-Test result
- eClass Record
-Test Questions
-Table of
specifications

4- 3 of the evidences
were present
3- 2 of the evidences
2- 1 of the evidences
1- No evidence at all
-Learners' Portfolio
-Table of
specifications
-Rubrics
4- 4 of the evidences
were present
3- 3 of the evidences
were present
2- 2 of the evidences
were present
1- 1 or no evidence
at all
2. Attained 75% MPS and June 2016- 10% 5- Complete
above of students' April 2017 compilation of
performance level in all subject quarterly exam
areas handled during the results for easy
School Year 2016-2017. verification
4- Compilation
lacked 1 of the
quarterly exam
results
3- Compilation
lacked 2 of the
quarterly exam
results
2- Compilation
lacked 3 of the
quarterly exam rsults
1- No quarterly exam
results were
compiled
 3. Ensured 85% students'
promotion in all subject areas
handled for the School Year
2016-2017
3. Community 1. Conference with parents of June 2016-
Involvement learners who need academic
15% monitoring/follow-up/habitual
absenteeism within rating
period.
April 2017 10% 5- At least 5 grading
sheets with complete
grade entries (1st to
4th quarters with
final grades)
4- 4 grading sheets
with complete
entries
3- 3 grading sheets
with complete grade
entries
2- 2 grading sheets
with complete grade
entries
1. 1 or no grading
sheets
5% 5- Conference record
April 2017 supported by:
-Attendance record
-Agreement with
parents
- Picture during
conference
4- Lacked 1 of the
evidences
3- Lacked 2 of the
evidences
2- Lacked 3 of the
evidences
1- No evidence at all
2. Participated in events and June 2016- 5% 5- Attended 4 or more
activities conducted in the April 2017 events/activities such
school and community where as but not limited to:
parents and other stakeholders -Brigada eskwela
are involved within the school -Girl Scout of the
Philippines
year -Subayan keg Subanen
Festival
-World's Teacher 's
Day
-United Nations
-Culmination
program
4- Attended 3
events/activities
3- Attended 2
events/activities
2- Attended 1
event/activity
1- No event/activity
attended
 3. Conducted PTA meetings
and conferences every quarter April 2017
4. Professional 1. Participated in
Growth and trainings/seminars/workshops/ April 2017
Development confereces within the year in
15% the national,regional,
division,district,etc
June 2016- 5% 5- Conducted PTA
meetings and
conferences every
month.
4- Conducted PTA
meetings and
conferences once
every 2 months.
3- Conducted PTA
meetings and
conferences every
quarter.
2- Conducted PTA
meetings and
conferences once
every 2 quarters.
1- Never conducted a
PTA meeting
June 2016- 5% 5- Attended at least
1 national training
within the school
year
4- At least 1 regional
training
3- At least 2 division
trainings
2- At least 5 school
trainings
1- No record of
trainings attended
 2. Attended the monthly SLAC
sessions conducted in school
every month
June 2016- 5% 5- Attended 7-8SLAC
April 2017 sessions within the
school year with
complete attendance
4- 5-6 SLAC sessions
3- 4-3 SLAC sessions
2- 2-1 SLAC sessions
1- No SLAC session
attended

3. Joined or participated June 2016- 5% 5- Joined the entire

trainings for newly hired April 2017 duration of the
teacher (TIP) with certificate training with
certificate of
participation
4- Joined
the entire duration of
the training but has
no certificate
3- Commit
1 day absent but still
received certificate
2- Commit 2
absences but still
received certificate
1-
Not at all

CHARRIE FE C. CONCEPCION MARIE JANE M. PABRIGA

Ratee Rater
Summary of Rating
KRA Weight per KRA Objectives
KRA1 15% Objectives 1
10% Objectives 2
15% Objectives 3
KRA2 10% Objectives 1
10% Objectives 2
10% Objectives 3
KRA3 5% Objectives 1
5% Objectives 2
5% Objectives 3
KR4 5% Objectives 1
5% Objectives 2
5% Objectives 3
100%

Final Performance Results

Accomplishment of KRAs
and Objectives

Name of Employee: CHARRIE FE C. CONCEPCION

Signature:
Date:

CHARRIE FE C. CONCEPCION MARIE JANE M. PABRIG

Ratee Rater
 of the Philippine
ent of Education
Region X
OOL OF ARTS AND TRADES
col, Ozamiz City

MMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Rater MARIE JANE M. PABRIGA

Position: MT-1
Date of Review: APRIL 7, 2017

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS

RATING SCORE
Efficiency Timeliness Q E T Ave.

5- Time or resources 5- Prepared 4 3 4 3.667 3.66667 0.550

were used to the DLLs and IMs 2 days
maximum for the before teaching.
intended task or 4- A day before
purpose. teaching
4- Time or resources 3- On the day of
were used with the teaching
minimal utilization. 2- Prepared DLLs but
3- Time was used incomplete and not
with lacking 1 or 2 updated
resources 1- No DLLs and IMs.
2- Time was used
with lacking 3
resources
1- Time was used
with no resources
5- Teaching 5- Use of 3 3 4 3.333 3.33333 0.333
strategies elicited differentiated
80% and above instruction was
mastery level of the utilized 5 times in a
students. quarter
4- Elicited 76%-80% 4- Use of
mastery level of the differentiated
students. instruction was
3- Elicited 75% - utilized 4 times in a
mastery level quarter
2- Elicited 65% - 69% 3- 3 times in a
mastery level quarter
1- Elicited 64% and 2- 2 times in a
below mastery level quarter
1- Once in a quarter

5- Attendance 5- Attendance 5 4 4 4.333 4.33333 0.650

checking was 100% checking was done in
sytematically carried the morning and in
out the afternoon
4- 95% - 99% 4- Attendance
systematically carried checking was done
out once a day
3- 90%b- 94% 3- Attendance
systematically carried checking was done
out thrice in a week
2- 85% - 89% 2- Attendance
systematically carried checking was done
out. twice a week
1- 80% and below 1- Attendance
checking was done
once a week
5- Class Record (CR) 5- Learning 5 4 3 4 4 0.400
reflected 100% assessment
students' ratings in conducted as
all quarters witn the scheduled
following -Pre-test
components: -Quarterly exams
-Written works -Post test
-Performance tasks 4- Concducted 2 days
-Quarterly after the schedule
assessments 3- Conducted a week
4- Reflected 80%- after the schedule
98% 2- Conducted two
3- Reflected 80%- weeks after the
89% schedule
2- Reflected 70%- 1- Failed to condcuct
79%
1- No class record

5- Test results 5- Quarterly exam 5 4 5 4.667 4.66667 0.467

showed 75% and results were available
above MPS a week after the exam
4- Test results 4- Quarterly exam
showed 65%-74% results were available
MPS 2 weeks after the
3- Test results exam
showed 60%-64% 3- Quarterly exam
MPS results were available
2- Test results 3 weeks after the
showed 51%-59% exam
MPS 2- Quarterly exam
1- Test results results were available
showed 50% and a month after the
below MPS exam
1- No available test
results at all
5- 95-100% of 5- Reinforcement 4 3 3 3.333 3.33333 0.333
students in the activity was given to
subjects taught were those at risk of failing
promoted once a month
4- 90%-94% of the 4- Reinforcement
students were activity was given to
promoted those at risk of failing
3- 85%-89% of the before the exam
students were 3- Reinforcement
promoted activity was given to
2- 75%-84% of the those at risk of failing
students were after the exam
promoted 2- Reinforcement
1- Below 75% of the activity was given to
students were those at risk of failing
promoted once in every two
quarters
1- No reinforcement
activity was
conducted

5- 95% conference 5- Conference with 4 3 3 3.333 3.33333 0.167

with succesfull parent done every
interventions month or every
4- 85%-94% quarter
accomplishment of 4- Conference done
set visits/conference every 4 months
with partial success 3- Conference done
of the interventions by semester
3- 75%-84% 2- Conference done
accomplishment end of the school year
conference with 1- No conference
unsuccessful conducted
intervention
2- Complied 65%-
74% conference
1- No conference
conducted
5- 95%-100% 5- On time and 4 3 4 3.667 3.66667 0.183
support extended to regular attendance to
events/activities in meetings/events
school and 4- Attended
community meetings/events but
4- 90%-94% support observed to be late
extended once
3- 80%-89% support 3- Observed to be
extended late twice
2- 70%-79% support 2- With incomplete
extended attendance and late
1- Below 70% once
support extended 1- With incomplete
attendance and late
twice or trice
5- Conducteed 95- 5- On time and 3 3 5 3.667 3.66667 0.183
100% PTA meetings regular on the
and conferences conduct of PTA
4- Conducted 90- meetings
94% PTA meetings 4- Conducted PTA
and conferences meetings but
3- Conducted 80%- observed to be late
89% PTA meeetings once
and conferences 3- Observed to be
2- Conducted 70%- late twice
79% PTA meetings 2- With incomplete
and conferences attendance and late
1- Conducted below once
70% PTA meetings 1- With incomplete
and conferences attendance and late
twice or trice

5- With evidences of 5- Punctual and 5 4 4 4.333 4.33333 0.650

trainings attended: complete attendance
-Cert. of appearance of trainings attended
-Cert. of 4- Complete
participation attendance but
-Memo observed to be late
-Pictures once
4- Presence of 3 of 3- Complete
the evidences attendance but
3- Presence of 2 of observed to be late
the evidences twice
2- Presence of 1 of 2- Incomplete
the evidences attendance and late
1- No evidence at all once
1- Incomplete and
late twice or more
5- 95%-100% SLAC 5- Punctuality in 5 3 4 4 4 0.200
outputs were attendance of all the
complied 7-8SLACs
4- 90%-94% SLAC 4- 5-6 SLACs
outputs were 3- 4-3 SLACs
complied 2- 2-1 SLACs
3- 85%-89% SLAC 1- Late twice
outputs were
complied
2- 80%-84% SLAC
sessions were
complied
1- Below 80% of the
outputs were
complied

5- Improved and 5- Completed 3 days 5 3 5 4.333 4.33333 0.217

develop 90%-100% with certificate and
of my teaching duly signed by the
strategies Superintendent
4- Improved and 4- Completed 3
develop 80%-89% of days with certificate
my teaching 3-
strategies Completed 3 days
3- Improved and 2- Absent
develop 75%-79% of for 1 day
my teaching 1- Absent for 2 days
strategies
2- Improved and
develop below
75%of my teaching
strategies
1- No
improvement of my
teaching strategies

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENT 4.333

LILIBETH Y. ABAMONGA
Approving Authority
Objectives Weight per Objective Rating Score
Objectives 1
Objectives 2
Objectives 3
Objectives 1
Objectives 2
Objectives 3
Objectives 1
Objectives 2
Objectives 3
Objectives 1
Objectives 2
Objectives 3

Rating Adjectival Rating

Name of Superior: MARIE JANE M. PABRIGA

Signature:
 Date:

ARIE JANE M. PABRIGA LILIBETH Y. ABAMONGA

Rater Approving Authority