Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There have been several advances in technology in society with smart phones, smart TVs,
and even smart cars. Smart being defined as innovative and transformative changes driven by
new technologies (Leahy 2016). With the increase of the availability of technology to improve
and enhance life, there has been a shift in education to increase the use of technology. Students
are exposed more and more to technology in their day to day lives and infusing this technology
into the classroom can enhance learning and provide students with the opportunity to develop
skills that they will use in and out of the classroom. This push to use technology is not occurring
in just one school or one school system or even one county or continent but it is global
Even in underdeveloped countries there have been advances in the use of technology in
classrooms. The goal even in those countries is to prepare their students for the changing
technological world that they live in whether it is directly available to them or not. This is true
for the country of India. There have been several studies conducted on how technology can
performance and attitude toward learning. The BridgeIT India project was conducted in two
states in India that were identified due to low social economic status of parents and low
performance of students in English and Science (Wennersten 2015). That project implemented
the use of mobile phone video content in classrooms in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. The
students took a pre-test on the content before using the technology and then was assessed at the
end of the study. There was a significant increase in English and Science performance after the
implementation of the mobile technology (Wennersten 2015). This was not an isolated event.
Even when the number of schools involved increased, there was still an increase in the students
2
technology in science classroom was conducted were the students performance on assessments
was measured but students were also surveyed to determine how they felt about the increase use
of technology and how it enhanced their learning (Raj 2015). The results of that study supported
the use of technology in science classrooms as being more effective than not using technology.
colors, artistry, and people, living in subpar conditions, in education they are right on track with
their desire to be educated and to use technology where and when possible to improve student
achievement. The issues that India faces in addressing the needs of their students are like those
faced in the United States, teacher training, language acquisition, and infrastructure are obstacles
Professional Development
Teaching training was addressed in both the BridgeIT India project and in the article on
effectiveness of electronic classroom for Teaching General Science at Secondary School Level
by Mool Raj Sharma and Arun K. Gupta. For any technology initiative to be successful, there
must be teachers adequately trained to implement the instructional strategies. Both articles
acknowledged that teachers do not have the resources or training to be effective in implement
curriculum. In the BridgeIT India program before the mobile technology could be implemented
in the Indian states of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, teacher ability had to be addressed
(Wennersten 2015). Teachers received training on how to use the mobile devices in the
classroom. During professional development, the teachers received a mobile device and were
trained on how to access the videos connected to the current curriculum and how to connect the
device to a television to be shared with students. Before taking the devices back to their
classrooms, experts demonstrated how to use the devices first and then teachers were given time
3
to go through a lesson without students so that they could feel comfortable using the equipment
and receive feedback on their lesson delivery. These training is not a one-time event. Those
teachers are visited periodically by the experts and are invited back each year to participate in the
training along with new teachers. This was also the case in the Sharma study. The teachers
received display systems that consisted of a large screen television, a computer, projector, and
backup power supply. The teachers also received training from the company that designed the
Part of the study to prepare for the BridgeIT India project indicated that the students and
teachers may have been unable to access the curriculum due to low English language skills.
Those with access to television programs with English subtitles tended to do better on
assessments due to exposure. Not every household or student had access to television or
technology at home so that use of technology in the classroom helped to expose them to the
English and content necessary to be successful. Teacher training was critical in the success of
their programs and students, as they were leading the work of implementing technology in the
classroom.
Curriculum Integration
Sharma doesnt mention curriculum development in the article but does indicate that the
lessons became more engaging using videos in the classroom that were followed up with an
activity that was not otherwise available or accessible because of the lack of training. The
technology was noted as allowing the teachers to use computers to enhance their delivery of
content. Based on the data presented the student were more interested and enthusiastic about the
4
When the BridgeIT India project began in 2011-2012 school year, there were 231 videos
available. After the pilot year, the government wanted to program expanded to more schools and
the teachers requested more videos. That expansion was met with 386 videos and 86 schools.
The videos in that project were intended as supplemental content to the current curriculum to be
used a few times a week to enhance student understanding that may not have been available if
the teachers did not receive further training. As curriculum is adjusted the teachers now have a
Infrastructure Issues
In implementing technology in Sharmas study and Wennerstens study, considerations
had to be made to the infrastructure and sustainability of the technology. In Sharmas study,
each classroom was equipped with a backup power supply in the event of a loss of power (2015).
In Wennerstens study, schools were selected based on whether they had a more reliable electric
supply. To address infrastructure issues amongst other issues in implementing technology, it may
be worth noting the need to select smart partnerships that can improve the schools infrastructure
(Leahy 2015). In Leahys article cited earlier for its explanation of smart, the importance of
article discussed how smart partnerships can increase equity in education in two different
countries, one of them being India. The partnership would not just be with the teachers, students,
parents, community but with companies that could provide resources to help more the initiative
(Leahy 2016). It is the hope that with the partnerships more students will have access to
technology to prepare for the future. Those partners would be a part of training teachers,
5
Analysis and Conclusion
It is interested to note that the same issues and concerns in education are also prevalent in
India. India is not considered to be a developed country yet these studies reveal that India is
making strides to expose their students to technology to increase student engagement and
achievement in areas very like those in the United States. We have high stakes tests in English
Language Arts, Math, and Science. That data is used to determine schools progress and is
reported by the state department of education in a report that is made available to stakeholders on
their website and occasionally individual school website. It would be worth considering what
not necessary to learn and process mathematics, unless of course word problems are involved.
Since these studies have been conducted has there been growth in the number of states that are
implementing the mobile technology? Are they having similar success? Has the smart
partnerships idea expanded so that schools are receiving funding support to improve their
infrastructure and thus increase technology usage in the classrooms? In the US, we have such
similar issues with budget cuts and teacher allocations be based on student enrollment and not
necessarily the content areas been taught. Administrators decide which content areas receive the
allotted teachers and thus class sized vary based on that allotment. In these studies, there was no
mention of class size issues. When there is a lack of trained teachers and technology, class size
doesnt seem to matter much. The goal is still the same regardless, improve student performance
using technology.
6
References
Leahy, M., Davis, N., Lewin, C., Charania, A., Nordin, H., Orlic, D., Butler D., & Lopez-
Fernadez, O. (2016) Smart Partnerships to Increase Equity in Education. Educational Technology
& Society, 19 (30, 84-98.
Sharma, M., & Gupta, A. K. (2016, March 08). Effectiveness of Electronic Classroom for
Teaching General Science at Secondary School Level. Retrieved June 17, 2017, from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230815223_EFFECTIVENESS_OF_ELECTRONIC_
CLASSROOM_FOR_TEACHING_GENERAL_SCIENCE_AT_SECONDARY_SCHOOL_LE
VEL
Wennersten, M., Quraishy, Z. B., & Velamuri, M. (2015). Improving student learning via mobile
phone video content: Evidence from the BridgeIT India project. International Review of
Education,61(4), 503-528. doi:10.1007/s11159-015-9504-y.