Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Basic research is advancing the understanding of the pathogenesis and management main mechanism of nutrition for the
of low back pain at the molecular and genetic levels. Frequently, low back pain is disk.2 Cells are sparse in the interver-
caused by disorders of the intervertebral disk. Cytokines such as matrix metallo- tebral disk, composing only 1% to 5%
proteinases, phospholipase A2, nitric oxide, and tumor necrosis factor- are thought of the tissue volume. Chondrocytes
to contribute to the development of low back pain. Drugs are being developed to are the predominant cell types in the
modulate these chemical mediators. Recent research using growth factors to pro- nucleus, and the number of cells de-
mote chondrocyte regeneration appears to be promising. Advances in gene therapy creases rapidly across the disk from
to both prevent disk degeneration and regenerate the disk eventually may have clin- the end plate to the nucleus.
ical application. The collagen network within the
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12:106-115 anulus fibrosus provides tensile
strength and limits the expansion of
proteoglycan aggrecan molecules
within the nucleus. These molecules
Between 70% and 85% of the popu- properties, as well as the mechanical provide compressive stiffness and en-
lation suffer from low back pain at behavior of the collagen-aggrecan able the tissue to undergo reversible
some time in their lives. The annual solid matrix, influence the deforma- deformation. The nucleus is rich in pro-
incidence of back pain in adults is 15%; tional characteristics of the nucleus teoglycans and normally has 70% to
its point prevalence is approximate- pulposus. The anulus fibrosus is com- 80% water content, which helps main-
ly 30%.1 Low back pain is the prima- posed of sheets of interlacing lamel- tain disk height and dissipate loads.
ry cause of disability in individuals lae of collagen and contains a rela- This viscoelastic property of the nu-
younger than 50 years. Potential sourc- tively homogeneous population of cleus and inner anulus is biphasic and
es of low back pain include the inter- chondrocyte-like cells that synthesize is associated with volumetric changes
vertebral disks, facet joints, vertebrae, a matrix rich in collagen and poor in that occur because of extrusion and
neural structures, muscles, ligaments, proteoglycans.
and fascia. Research on the patho- Types I and II collagen are the pre-
physiology of low back pain and ra- dominant forms of collagen in the disk
diculopathy is integral to developing material (Fig. 2). Type I collagen is Dr. Biyani is Assistant Professor, Department of
new management strategies. Current present in the highest concentration Orthopedic Surgery, Medical College of Ohio, To-
ledo, OH. Dr. Andersson is Professor and Chair-
advances in basic research eventu- in the anulus fibrosus and type II col-
man, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush
ally may translate into treatment. lagen, in the nucleus pulposus. Types University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
V and XI are present in small concen-
trations in the anulus and the nucle- None of the following authors or the departments
us pulposus, respectively. Certain non- with which they are affiliated has received anything
Intervertebral Disk of value from or owns stock in a commercial com-
Structure fibrillar, short-helix collagens, such as
pany or institution related directly or indirectly
VI and IX, are present in both the anu- to the subject of this article: Dr. Biyani and Dr.
Composed of fibrocartilaginous tis- lus and nucleus, whereas type XII is Andersson.
sue, the intervertebral disk absorbs present in the anulus fibrosus only.
and dissipates the loads on the spi- In the healthy intervertebral disk, Reprint requests: Dr. Andersson, Rush Univer-
sity Medical Center, 1750 W Harrison Street, 1471
nal column and allows smooth move- vascular and neural elements are lim-
J, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago,
ment of the spine. The disk has a ited to the peripheral fibers of the an- IL 60612.
unique structure composed of an in- ulus fibrosus. Above and below the
ner gelatinous nucleus pulposus sur- disk are sheets of hyaline cartilage Copyright 2004 by the American Academy of
rounded by an outer anulus fibrosus called end plates that have pores that Orthopaedic Surgeons.
(Fig. 1). Hydraulic and ion transport provide channels for diffusion, the
Biologic and Biochemical TIMP = tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase; TNF = tumor necrosis factor
Approaches
Recently, basic research into the
pathophysiology of low back pain has
focused on the development of bio- and end plate upon percutaneous re- motion segment is significantly com-
logic repair strategies and pharmaco- insertion of autogenous fresh or cryo- promised because of continued stress
logic approaches to intercept and preserved nucleus pulposus. Cocul- on the disk tissue.
modulate the degenerative cascade ture of nucleus pulposus and anulus
(Table 3). Attempts also are being fibrosus cells has been shown to in- Gene Therapy
made to identify an ideal culture sys- vigorate the growth of anulus fibro- The role of gene therapy in the
tem to facilitate basic research into the sus cells, and in vivo disk degener- treatment of low back pain has been
metabolism of the entire interverte- ation is substantially delayed when extensively evaluated to prevent de-
bral disk. The response of intact disks nucleus pulposus cells are activated generative disk disease, regenerate
and experimental models of degen- by coculture with anulus fibrosus degenerated intervertebral disks, and
erated intervertebral disks then can cells.41 Nomura et al42 showed in rab- promote spinal fusion. Genes regu-
be monitored after various therapeu- bits that injection of an intact allo- late the synthesis of specific RNA and
tic manipulations, allowing new av- geneic nucleus pulposus is more ef- protein molecules, and their manip-
enues for biologic and biochemical fective than injection of nucleus ulation by gene therapy is an attrac-
treatment of low back pain to be ex- pulposus cells alone. These authors tive tool for inducing expression of
plored. Newer disk culture tech- hypothesized that the extracellular growth factors. Gene therapy in-
niques, such as the alginate tissue cul- matrix might play an important role volves transfer of a particular gene
ture system, may promote greater in slowing intervertebral disk degen- into a cell by means of a vector, which
proteoglycan synthesis within the nu- eration. leads to transcription of the gene into
cleus pulposus and anulus fibrosus Therapeutic strategies being ac- mRNA. Ribosomes then translate the
as well as maintain a higher content tively investigated include gene ther- mRNA into specific proteins.
of extracellular matrix compo- apy, growth factor therapy, and inhi- The delivery of genes may be ac-
nents.38 Similarly, development of bition of chemical mediators of pain. complished by means of viral and
three-dimensional disk culture tech- These approaches, however, are still nonviral vectors. Liposomes, gene
niques may allow intervertebral disks in the early stages of development guns, and gene-activated matrices are
to be used as an active carrier matrix. and may not be universally applica- nonviral vectors that induce gene
In a recent study, Hutton et al39 ble to the management of low back transfer by transfection. They are eas-
showed that autologous interverte- pain or even intervertebral disk de- ier to produce than viral vectors and
bral disk chondrocyte cells trans- generation. Biologic therapy of inter- are chemically more stable, but they
planted into dogs remained viable, vertebral disk degeneration may not have limited ability to transfect cells.
produced matrix, and achieved a be suitable for patients with severe Gene expression over extended peri-
normalized distribution within the changes because end-plate sclerosis ods may not be possible.43
disk space. Nishimura et al40 created impairs local tissue nutrition, with the Genes can be transferred to the cell
a model of degenerative interverte- result that the local environment may genome by ex vivo or in vivo tech-
bral disk disease in rats and noted de- become too hostile for repair. Simi- niques. Ex vivo therapy is considered
layed degeneration of the remaining larly, biologic repair may not be a vi- to be safer because the vector is not
nucleus pulposus, anulus fibrosus, able option when the stability of a introduced directly into the patient,
and the manipulated gene may be ation of a degenerated intervertebral chymal stem cells along the chondro-
evaluated in the laboratory for its disk.45 genic and osteogenic pathways. BMPs
safety before it is transferred to live A potential strategy to prevent or have shown promising results in pro-
subjects. Retroviruses are small RNA treat disk degeneration may be to moting spinal fusion in several ani-
viruses commonly used for ex vivo modify the intervertebral disk genet- mal studies47,48 and in early clinical
gene transfer. They infect only active- ically so that the proteoglycan content trials.49 Studies also are being con-
ly replicating cells at the time of trans- is not diminished within the nucle- ducted to evaluate whether, under the
duction. An exogenous gene is inte- us. Nishida et al46 noted a marked in- influence of growth factors such as
grated into the cell genome, thus crease in proteoglycan synthesis af- OP-1, metabolically impaired cells in
transmitting the transgene to the ter gene transfer in their animal an intervertebral disk that exhibits de-
daughter cells. The ex vivo technique experiments. Gene therapy may alter generative or age-related changes can
of gene transfer is a useful adjunct to the course of the degenerative pro- repair their own matrix and the disk
cell-based therapy and tissue engi- cess. Any attempts to delay interver- structure. OP-1 appears to have an an-
neering. In vivo techniques use direct tebral disk degeneration by gene ther- abolic effect on proteoglycan and col-
transfer of the gene within the cells apy also must address the issue of lagen synthesis. This stimulatory ef-
with the help of adenoviruses, which delaying natural disk degeneration fect appears to be more pronounced
infect both dividing and quiescent that might result in increased low on nucleus pulposus cells than on
cells. Unlike retroviral ex vivo trans- back pain later in life.45 anulus fibrosus cells.
duction, integration of DNA into the The intervertebral disk is largely
cell genome does not occur with ad- avascular and composed of poorly Inhibition of Chemical
enoviral in vivo techniques. characterized, slowly dividing cells Mediators of Pain
Gene delivery is considered to be in an immunoprotected environ- A better understanding of the bio-
beneficial for tissue engineering and ment. Relatively encapsulated, avas- chemical mediators of pain may fa-
repair. There are several advantages cular tissue would maintain injected cilitate development of pharmacolog-
in delivering genes to the tissues rath- viral vectors for long periods. In ic approaches to inhibit them. The role
er than administering gene products. vivo gene transfer with adenoviral of MMPs in the pathophysiology of
Gene delivery allows local produc- vectors therefore may be more ap- back pain has been well established,
tion of sustainable high concentra- propriate for the nucleus pulposus, and the inhibition of enzyme activ-
tions of the gene product for extend- particularly to prevent disk degen- ity or inhibition of enzyme synthesis
ed periods. Targeted delivery of gene eration. Ex vivo methods of gene are two principal ways to decrease
product is possible, which maximiz- therapy, with the help of a bioreactor MMP levels. TGF- appears to sup-
es therapeutic potential while mini- or tissue scaffold, may be preferable press MMP synthesis by suppressing
mizing side effects. In addition, en- for disk regeneration. However, the transcription. IL-1 receptor antago-
dogenously produced proteins may virus may leak through annular fis- nists also may block the IL-1induced
have greater biologic activity than ex- sures in the degenerated interverte- synthesis of MMPs and may have a
ogenously administered recombinant bral disk and evoke an immune re- potential role in treatment. Alpha2
proteins do.44 However, transgene sponse. An ideal treatment program macroglobulins and exogenous TIMP
expression commonly declines over for degenerative disk disease, how- have been found to be inapplicable
time. ever, must allow repeated injections or ineffective. An alternative and
The choice of a viral vector de- of gene therapy at the same or differ- more attractive option may be to
pends on several factors, including ent disk levels.45 increase local production of TIMP
the duration of the gene expression with agents that upregulate TIMP ex-
required, cell type to be transduced, Growth Factors pression.
and immunogenicity of the host tis- Recent advances in molecular bi- Early clinical trials with mono-
sue environment. The appropriate ology have led to cloning and char- clonal humanized chimeric antibod-
timing depends on the reason for acterization of bone morphogenetic ies against TNF- have been under-
gene expression. A long-term gene ex- proteins (BMPs), including BMP-2, taken recently, and early results are
pression clearly would be beneficial BMP-7, and BMP-like molecules, such promising.50 Other cytokines also
for preventing disk degeneration. as cartilage-derived morphogenic may be beneficial, such as insulin-
Markers for prolonged gene expres- proteins. BMP-7, also known as os- like growth factor-1 and platelet-de-
sion, such as lacZ and luciferase, have teogenic protein-1 (OP-1), is a mem- rived growth factor, which reduce
been identified in rabbit interverte- ber of the transforming growth cell apoptosis in human disk cells in
bral disks. A shorter time for expres- factor-beta (TGF-) superfamily that vitro51 by some as-yet unknown
sion may be appropriate for regener- promotes differentiation of mesen- mechanism.
Summary chemical mediators of pain, and tibodies against TNF- are being test-
growth factors that promote spinal fu- ed clinically. Future gene therapy re-
The last decade has seen a better un- sion and regeneration of disk mate- search likely will focus on proper
derstanding of the pathophysiology rial. New pharmacologic approach- selection of the gene and delivery
of low back pain and new manage- es for abolishing low back pain with method so that a sufficient amount of
ment possibilities with modalities such agents such as platelet-derived growth gene is expressed within the target tis-
as gene therapy, the inhibition of factor and monoclonal chimeric an- sue for an appropriate time.
References
1. Andersson GBJ: Epidemiological fea- Larkin L, Stefanovic-Racic M, Donalson cytokines in the herniated disc of the lum-
tures of chronic low-back pain. Lancet WF III, Evans CH: Herniated lumbar bar spine. Spine 1996;21:218-224.
1999;354:581-585. intervertebral discs spontaneously pro- 23. Yasuma T, Makino E, Saito S, Inui M:
2. Urban JPG, Holm S, Maroudas A, duce matrix metalloproteinases, nitric Histological development of interverte-
Nachemson A: Nutrition of the inter- oxide, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin bral disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg
vertebral disc: Effect of fluid flow on E2. Spine 1996;21:271-277. Am 1986;68:1066-1072.
solute transport. Clin Orthop 1982;170: 14. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Hayashi N, 24. Matsui Y, Maeda M, Nakagami W, Iwata
296-302. Hashizume H, Nishi H: Possible mech- H: The involvement of matrix metallo-
3. Miller JAA, Schmatz C, Schultz AB: anism of painful radiculopathy in lum- proteinases and inflammation in lumbar
Lumbar disc degeneration: Correlation bar disc herniation. Clin Orthop 1998; disc herniation. Spine 1998;23:863-869.
with age, sex, and spine level in 600 au- 351:241-251. 25. Sedowofia KA, Tomlinson IW, Weiss JB,
topsy specimens. Spine 1988;13:173-178. 15. Saal JS, Franson RC, Dobrow R, Saal JA, Hilton RC, Jayson MI: Collagenolytic en-
4. Pokharna HK, Phillips FM: Collagen White AH, Goldthwaite N: High levels zyme systems in human intervertebral
crosslinks in human lumbar interverte- of inflammatory phospholipase A2 ac- disc: Their control, mechanism, and their
bral disc aging. Spine 1998;23:1645-1648. tivity in lumbar disc herniations. Spine possible role in the initiation of biome-
5. Buckwalter JA: Aging and degenera- 1990;15:674-678. chanical failure. Spine 1982;7:213-222.
tion of the human intervertebral disc. 16. Franson RC, Saal JS, Saal JA: Human 26. Roberts S, Caterson B, Menage J, Evans
Spine 1995;20:1307-1314. disc phospholipase A2 is inflammatory. EH, Jaffray DC, Eisenstein SM: Matrix
6. Adams MA, Freeman BJC, Morrison Spine 1992;17(supp 6):S129-S132. metalloproteinases and aggrecanase:
HP, Nelson IW, Dolan P: Mechanical 17. Grnblad M, Virri J, Rnkk S, et al: A Their role in disorders of the human in-
initiation of intervertebral disc degen- controlled biochemical and immu- tervertebral disc. Spine 2000;25:3005-3013.
eration. Spine 2000;25:1625-1636. nohistochemical study of human 27. Kanemoto M, Hukuda S, Komiya Y,
7. Ng SC, Weiss JB, Quennel R, Jayson MI: synovial-type (group II) phospholipase Katsuura A, Nishioka J: Immunohis-
Abnormal connective tissue degrading A2 and inflammatory cells in macro- tochemical study of matrix metallo-
enzyme patterns in prolapsed interver- scopically normal, degenerated, and proteinase-3 and tissue inhibitor of
tebral discs. Spine 1986;11:695-701. herniated human lumbar disc tissues. metalloproteinase-1 in human interver-
8. Coppes MH, Marani E, Thomeer RTWM, Spine 1996;21:2531-2538. tebral discs. Spine 1996;21:1-8.
Groen GJ: Innervation of painful lum- 18. Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Weinstein JN, 28. Brown MF, Hukkanen MVJ, McCarthy
bar discs. Spine 1997;22:2342-2349. Hashizume H, Nishi H, Meller ST: ID, et al: Sensory and sympathetic in-
9. Delamarter RB, Howard MW, Gold- Pathomechanism of pain-related be- nervation of the vertebral endplate in
stein T, Deutsch AL, Mink JH, Dawson havior produced by allografts of inter- patients with degenerative disc disease.
EG: Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: vertebral disc in the rat. Spine 1996;21: J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:147-153.
Preoperative and postoperative mag- 2101-2107. 29. Weinstein J: Neurogenic and nonneuro-
netic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint 19. Nemoto O, Yamagishi M, Yamada H, genic pain and inflammatory mediators.
Surg Am 1995;77:578-584. Kikuchi T, Takaishi H: Matrix metallo- Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22:235-246.
10. McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudkins proteinase-3 production by human de- 30. Harrington JF, Messier AA, Bereiter D,
PG, Laros GS: The inflammatory effect generated intervertebral disc. J Spinal Barnes B, Epstein MH: Herniated lum-
of nucleus pulposus: A possible ele- Disord 1997;10:493-498. bar disc material as a source of free
ment in the pathogenesis of low-back 20. Liu J, Roughley PJ, Mort JS: Identifica- glutamate available to affect pain sig-
pain. Spine 1987;12:760-764. tion of human intervertebral disc nals through the dorsal root ganglion.
11. Kayama S, Konno S, Olmarker K, Yabuki stromelysin and its involvement in ma- Spine 2000;25:929-936.
S, Kikuchi S: Incision of the anulus fi- trix degradation. J Orthop Res 1991;9: 31. Yabuki S, Kikuchi S, Olmarker K, My-
brosus induces nerve root morphologic, 568-575. ers RR: Acute effects of nucleus pulpo-
vascular, and functional changes: An ex- 21. Doita M, Kanatani T, Ozaki T, Matsui sus on blood flow and endoneurial flu-
perimental study. Spine 1996;21:2539-2543. N, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S: Influence of id pressure in rat dorsal root ganglia.
12. Kayama S, Olmarker K, Larsson K, macrophage infiltration of herniated Spine 1998;23:2517-2523.
Sjgren-Jansson E, Lindahl A, Rydevik disc tissue on the production of matrix 32. Ohtori S, Takahashi K, Chiba T, Yama-
B: Cultured, autologous nucleus pulpo- metalloproteinases leading to disc re- gata M, Sameda H, Moriya H: Sensory
sus cells induce functional changes in spi- sorption. Spine 2001;26:1522-1527. innervation of the dorsal portion of the
nal nerve roots. Spine 1998;23:2155-2158. 22. Takahashi H, Suguro T, Okazima Y, Motegi lumbar intervertebral discs in rats.
13. Kang JD, Georgescu HI, McIntyre- M, Okada Y, Kakiuchi T: Inflammatory Spine 2001;26:946-951.
33. Bogduk N: The innervation of the lum- 40. Nishimura K, Mochida J: Percutaneous 47. Magin MN, Delling G: Improved lum-
bar spine. Spine 1983;8:286-293. reinsertion of the nucleus pulposus: bar vertebral interbody fusion using
34. Sekine M, Yamashita T, Takebayashi T, An experimental study. Spine 1998;23: rhOP-1: A comparison of autogenous
Sakamoto N, Minaki Y, Ishii S: Mecha- 1531-1539. bone graft, bovine hydroxylapatite
nosensitive afferent units in the lumbar 41. Okuma M, Mochida J, Nishimura K, (bio-oss), and BMP-7 (rhOP-1) in sheep.
posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine Sakabe K, Seiki K: Reinsertion of stim- Spine 2001;26:469-478.
2001;26:1516-1521. ulated nucleus pulposus cells retards 48. Grauer JN, Patel TC, Erulkar JS, Troiano
35. Nakamura SI, Takahashi K, Takahashi Y, intervertebral disc degeneration: An in NW, Panjabi MM, Friedlaender GE: 2000
Masatsune Y, Moriya H: The afferent vitro and in vivo experimental study. Young Investigator Research Award win-
pathways of discogenic low-back pain: J Orthop Res 2000;18:988-997. ner: Evaluation of OP-1 as a graft sub-
Evaluation of L2 spinal nerve infiltration. 42. Nomura T, Mochida J, Okuma M, Nish- stitute for intertransverse process lum-
J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:606-612. imura K, Sakabe K: Nucleus pulposus bar fusion. Spine 2001;26:127-133.
36. Weinstein J, Claverie W, Gibson S: The allograft retards intervertebral disc de- 49. Patel TC, Vaccaro AR, Truumees E,
pain of discography. Spine 1988;13: generation. Clin Orthop 2001;389:94-101. Fischgrund JS, Hilibrand AS, Herko-
1344-1348. 43. Nishida K, Gilbertson LG, Robbins PD, witz HN: Abstract: Two-year follow up
37. Byrd G, Olmarker K, Konno S, Lars- Evans CH, Kang JD: Potential applica- of a safety and efficacy study of OP-1
son K, Takahashi K, Rydevik B: A rapid tions of gene therapy to the treatment (rhBMP-7) as an adjunct to posterolat-
transport route between the epidural of intervertebral disc disorders. Clin eral lumbar fusion. 16th Annual Meeting
space and the intraneural capillaries of Orthop 2000;379(suppl):S234-S241. Proceedings. LaGrange, IL: North Amer-
the nerve roots. Spine 1995;20:138-143. 44. Kang R, Ghivizzani SC, Muzzonigro ican Spine Society, 2001, pp 20-21.
38. Chiba K, Andersson GBJ, Masuda K, TS, Herndon JH, Robbins PD, Evans 50. Korhonen T, Karppinen J, Malmivaara
Momohara S, Williams JM, Thonar EJ- CH: The Marhsall R. Urist Young Inves- A, et al: Abstract: Treatment of sciatica
MA: A new culture system to study the tigator Award: Orthopaedic applica- with infliximab, a monoclonal human-
metabolism of the intervertebral disc in tions of gene therapy. From concept to ised chimaeric antibody against TNF.
vitro. Spine 1998;23:1821-1828. clinic. Clin Orthop 2000;375:324-337. 29th Annual Meeting Proceedings. Tor-
39. Hutton WC, Meisel HJ, Akamura T, 45. Kang JD, Boden SD: Breakout session 7: onto, Canada: International Society
Minamide A, Ganey T: Abstract: Autol- Spine. Clin Orthop 2000;379(suppl): for the Study of the Lumbar Spine,
ogous disc chondrocyte transplantation S256-S259. 2000, p 14.
for repair of acute disc herniation. 29th 46. Nishida K, Gilbertson LG, Evans CH, 51. Gruber HE, Norton HJ, Hanley EN Jr:
Annual Meeting Proceedings. Toronto, Kang JD: Potential applications of gene Anti-apoptotic effects of IGF-1 and
Canada: International Society for the therapy to the treatment of spinal dis- PDGF on human intervertebral disc
Study of the Lumbar Spine, 2002, p 26. orders. Spine 2000;25:1308-1314. cells in vitro. Spine 2000;25:2153-2157.