Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED Urdu not for Pashto but possible to write Pashto. In analysis
AND EXISTING SYSTEM its clearly identify our proposed system is much better than
All those features available in PashApp which is beneficial other.
for different users to write Pashto are comparing with the In table 1 comparison of existing system and proposed
existing systems like online Pashto text editor which is very system is given
simple feature wise. While the other InPage is specific for
This study is evaluated by using questionnaire based control Pakhtunkhwa which have speaks and write Pashto it make
experiment. In questionnaire based control experiments the up our accessible population.
participants are asked to execute a number of tasks based Sampling: The study considers the simple random sampling
experiments on functional prototype of PashApp and fill the technique, where each individual of the population have
feature based questionnaire [4]. equal chance of being selected as a sample. To evaluate the
posted research statement with real users on applying the
6.1 Participant Sampling functional prototype, the study includes 20 volunteer
Sampling is the process of selecting individuals from the participants. Asking the users to fill the questionnaire using
accessible population which are the representatives of entire Pashto editor PashApp for the analysis.
population and are unbiased. Accessible population means
individuals within reach in the existent resources, especially 6.2 Participants
time and cost. The study included 20 volunteers (16 male and 4 female),
Target Population: The individuals how have Pashto native selected from the population by applying simple random
speakers they are properly Pashto speak and write and they sampling technique and the prototype is presented to them
already familiar with different Pashto editor [13]. for evaluation. The participants demographics in table 3 are
Accessible Population: The individuals from different summarized on the bases of how often they use Pashto
educational institutions around the capital and Khyber editor.
Rate the features of PashApp are of greatest importance to of the features represents encouraging results features like
evaluate how much the PASHAPP present the functionality Color visibility (CV), Icon distinction & visibility (IDV)
according to the user's requirement. The user response and Overall layout (OL) The figure 4 shows the
relatively weak result for Color distinction (CD) while rest functionalities rate by users.