The Role of Empathy in Burnout, Compassion

Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic

Stressamong Social Workers
M. Alex Wagaman, Jennifer M. Geiger, Clara Shockley, and Elizabeth A. Segal

Social workers are at risk for experiencing burnout and secondary traumatic stress (STS) as
a result of the nature of their work and the contexts within which they work. Little attention
has been paid to the factors within a social workers control that may prevent burnout and
STS and increase compassion satisfaction. Empathy, which is a combination of physiological
and cognitive processes, may be a tool to help address burnout and STS. This article reports
on the findings of a study of social workers (N=173) that explored the relationship between
the components of empathy, burnout, STS, and compassion satisfaction using the Empathy
Assessment Index and the Professional Quality of Life instruments. It was hypothesized that
higher levels of empathy would be associated with lower levels of burnout and STS, and
higher levels of compassion satisfaction. Findings suggest that components of empathy may
prevent or reduce burnout and STS while increasing compassion satisfaction, and that em-
pathy should be incorporated into training and education throughout the course of a social
workers career.

KEY WORDS: burnout; compassion fatigue; compassion satisfaction; empathy; secondary

traumatic stress

S ocial workers provide support and assistance to

clients in a variety of potentially stressful work
environments. Despite training in self-care,
social workers are especially susceptible to burnout
and secondary traumatic stress (STS) (Lloyd, King, &
Chenoweth, 2002). Burnout has been linked to
stressful working conditions, vicarious trauma, and a
lack of resources and support. Without effective strat-
egies for managing stress and burnout, overall satis
faction with work and helping otherscompassion
satisfactionmay be compromised (Stamm, 2010).
Secondary trauma is the secondhand exposure to
traumatic events, typically experienced while listening
to others telling their life stories (Pryce, Shackelford,
& Pryce, 2007). Such vicarious trauma can contribute
to feelings of burnout (van Heugten, 2011). On the
surface, the relationship between secondary trauma
and burnout suggests that sharing the feelings of ones
clients can be detrimental to a workers mental health.
However, practitioners are urged to be empathic.
Competency skills for social work education include
learning to use empathy to engage diverse client sys-
tems (Council on Social Work Education, 2014). This
relationship highlights the need to better understand
the role of empathy in social work practice.
Much of the research conducted with social work
ers and burnout has focused on the influence of en-
vironmental factors, such as work environment, on
worker well-being rather than the characteristics or
factors related to the individual (Maslach, Schaufeli,
& Leiter, 2001; Schaufeli & Enzmann, 1998). Al-
though sharing emotions may contribute to burn-
out, empathy as a protective factor has not been fully
explored as a means to address the potential risks
associated with service-related work. The level of
empathy a social worker has may influence his or
her ability to manage the stressors associated with
burnout and STS, as well as the level of compassion
satisfaction.
WHAT IS BURNOUT?
Burnout refers to overwhelming emotional exhaus-
tion, depersonalization, and feelings of professional
insufficiency. It results from demanding and emo-
tionally charged relationships with clients such that
an individual can no longer fulfill even the most basic
personal and professional responsibilities or duties
(Boyas, Wind, & Kang, 2012; Maslach & Schaufeli,
1993). Burnout as it applies to social workers is gen-
erally conceptualized as a gradual process that rarely

doi: 10.1093/sw/swv014 2015 National Association of Social Workers 201

occurs suddenly or with one event, but instead builds
over time as healthy defenses are worn down from
an onslaught of emotional demands, frustrating
job setbacks, or difficult situations or individuals
( Jacobson, Rothschild, Mirza, & Shapiro, 2013). It
is believed that the single largest risk factor for de-
veloping professional burnout is human service work
in general (Newell & MacNeil, 2010, p. 59). Burn-
out has been associated with physical and mental
health problems such as depression, insomnia, and
gastrointestinal issues (Burke & Deszca, 1986; Lee &
Ashforth, 1996) as well as decreased job performance,
increased absenteeism, and high turnover (Kahill,
1988). Burnout has also been shown to lead to lower
organizational commitment, which is related to
higher staff turnover and lower productivity (Maslach
& Leiter, 1997), and potentially decreased effective-
ness in work with clients (McCarthy & Frieze,
1999). Practitioners with personal trauma history,
anxiety or mood disorder (Newell & MacNeil,
2010), personal relationships involving conflict, low
threshold for minor annoyances, as well as boredom
or lack of commitment to the profession can be at an
elevated risk for burnout (Kulkarni, Bell, & Hartman,
2013).
Work behaviors that may signal burnout include
chronic tardiness, missing work, poor completion
rates or low performance, work errors, or isolation
from others (Newell & MacNeil, 2010). Work en-
vironments also invite burnout, such as roles in
which workers have less control of their time or
tasks, higher levels of bureaucracy, lack of clarity
with job roles, higher work demand, greater confu-
sion of work identities, and difficulties with people
(Newell & MacNeil, 2010). In addition, disconnect
with supervisors or coworkers prompts higher risk
of burnout (Kulkarni et al., 2013).
STS AND SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE
STS is a condition characterized by fatigue that can
arise from the witnessing or listening to the accounts
of disturbing experiences or traumatic events (Bride,
2007). STS can lead to workers experiencing trauma
themselves, where rumination, flashbacks, physio-
logical responses, fear, dread, or other active symp-
toms of psychoemotional strain (Bride, 2007) cause
interruption in their work (Perkins & Sprang, 2013).
STS is a syndrome comprised of symptoms that
closely resemble those of posttraumatic stress disorder
(Bride, 2007) and may include hypervigilance, night-
mares, sleeplessness, agitation, or fatigue (Newell &
202
MacNeil, 2010). The National Institute of Mental
Health (2014) reported that the primary symptoms
of STS include hopelessness, inability to embrace or
disdain of complexity, avoidance of clients or others,
fear, physical ailments, and minimizing problems and
guilt. One study reported that the prevalence of at
least one symptom of STS among social workers is
70 percent (Bride, 2007).
APPROACHES TO REDUCE BURNOUT AND STS
A number of self-care strategies have been suggested
for social workers to prevent and manage the risks
associated with burnout and STS. Figley (2002) and
Stamm (1999) recommended that those working
inhuman services and other professionals strive to
address their own personal, familial, emotional, and
spiritual needs while responding to the demands
andneeds placed on them by clients. Setting goals
and boundaries with regard to breaks at work, work-
load, and client care has also been suggested to re-
duce the risk of burnout (Maslach, 2003). A healthy
network of personal connection, compatibility with
an effective supervisor, collegial support, and having
and using a voice at work may also reduce the effects
of burnout and STS (Lakey & Cohen, 2000). Ex
perience managing social work challenges with the
guidance of an effective supervisor or role model
builds resilience and reliance, which help to reduce
burnout risks (Boyas et al., 2012). In general, main-
taining overall physical health with adequate exercise,
recreation, sleep, and nutrition can also reduce
susceptibility to STS and burnout (OHalloran &
OHalloran, 2001; Zimering, Munroe, & Gulliver,
2003).
Structured approaches to reducing burnout are
typically directed at the individual or the organiza-
tion. The cognitivebehavioral approach, directed
at the individuals, typically involves actions such as
enhancing job competency through training and
education, skill development, fostering relaxation
and social support, and increasing personal coping
skills (Awa, Plaumann, & Walter, 2010). Organization-
directed approaches include changes in work pro-
cesses, supervision and supervisory relationship eval
uation and modification, and increased job control
and decision making. A combination of personal
and organizational interventions have longer last-
ing positive effects in reducing burnout (Awa etal.,
2010). However, it is believed there is too much
focus on treating burnout after it occurs, rather than
preventing burnout. Newell and MacNeil (2010)
Social Work Volume 60, Number 3 July 2015
suggested including consistent and accurate infor-
mation about the key features, signs, and symptoms
of burnout and STS in social work education as a
means of raising awareness and preventing burnout
and STS among social workers.
COMPASSION SATISFACTION
Compassion satisfaction is the positive feelings
about peoples ability to help and relates to quality
of work life (Stamm, 2010, p. 8). In contrast to
burnout or STS, a workers sense of achievement,
sustained motivation, or even inspiration and enjoy
ment from emotionally demanding social work can
prompt compassion satisfaction. Compassion satis-
faction is an effective means of reducing burnout
and STS as it provides motivation, stamina, interest,
and a sense of accomplishment in aiding clients to
overcome trauma (Bride, Radey, & Figley, 2007).
Compassion satisfaction leads to situations in which
social workers can vicariously benefit from their
clients improved functioning, personal growth, or
therapeutic gains as they share the positive outcomes
and feelings of empowerment, energy, and exhilara-
tion (Pooler, Wolfer, & Freeman, 2014).
Providing energy, insight, or strengthened resolve
for helping and service, compassion satisfaction is
most commonly seen in heightened performance,
positive attitude toward work, enhanced value, or
greater hope for positive outcomes that resonate
among successful social workers (Kulkarni et al.,
2013). Compassion satisfaction may be viewed as
antithetical to compassion fatigue, where exhaustion
or hopelessness takes over ones work, leading to
burnout (Stamm, 2010). Yet no formula or simplified
approach to compassion satisfaction is known.
THE VALUE OF EMPATHY
A critical skill in social work practice and other
helping professions is the ability to empathize with
others, particularly ones clients (Gerdes & Segal,
2011). Empathy is a multidimensional process in-
volving cognitive and affective components of un-
derstanding and identifying with the thoughts,
feelings, and emotional states of others (Batson,
2011; Gibbons, 2011). Empathy is the ability to
understand what other people are feeling and
thinking and is an essential skill in facilitating social
agreement and successfully navigating personal
relationships (de Waal, 2010; Toussaint & Webb,
2005). Empathy helps to create and maintain social
relationships and bonds by enabling individuals to
Wagaman et al. / The Role of Empathy in Burnout, Compassion Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic Stress
comprehend, share, and respond to the emotions,
gestures, thoughts, and experiences of others (de
Waal, 2010).
Studies agree that empathy is critical for effective
clinical practice and positive therapeutic outcomes
(Elliott, Bohart, Watson, & Greenberg, 2011; Gibbons,
2011; Neumann et al., 2009). There is also evidence
that empathy is related to positive moral develop-
ment (Eisenberg & Eggum, 2009; Killen & Smetana,
2008) and promotes prosocial behaviors, particularly
during adolescence (Batson, Hkansson Eklund,
Chermok, Hoyt, & Ortiz, 2007; Laible, Carlo, &
Roesch, 2004; McMahon, Wernsman, & Parnes,
2006).
THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF EMPATHY
Varying definitions of empathy have emerged over
the years; however, recent advances in cognitive neu-
roscience have identified key components that to-
gether make up the full array of empathy (Decety,
2011; Decety & Moriguchi, 2007). This research is
based on the cognitive neuroscience conceptualiza-
tion of empathy. As such, empathy comprises four
subjectively experienced components: (1) affective
response, (2) selfother awareness, (3) perspective
taking, and (4) emotion regulation (Gerdes, Lietz, &
Segal, 2011). Affective response is a physiological
component that involves the automatic and uncon-
scious process of affect sharing, or the mirroring of
another persons actions. For example, when sitting
with a client who is crying, a practitioner might feel
as if she or he is going to cry. This is a result of the
automatic mirroring action that is going on uncon-
sciously. Our mirroring neuron system activates the
same physiological sensations as if we are actually
doing the action. However, rather than begin to cry,
the practitioner experiences the other components
of empathy that are triggered to process this affective
response. The other three components are cognitive
processes. Selfother awareness consists of an ability
to recognize and understand ones own emotions and
thoughts as well as distinguish the self from others.
Perspective taking involves the ability to understand
anothers experiences while maintaining awareness
of the self and the distinction from the other. Emo-
tion regulation refers to ones ability to control or
regulate ones emotions.
In the aforementioned example, by engaging all
three of these cognitive components, the practitio-
ner is able to feel the clients distress of crying but
recognize the difference between the clients actions
203
and the practitioners own physiological reactions,
use those feelings to engage in deep understanding,
and simultaneously regulate her or his own emotions
so as not to be overwhelmed. For the full array of
empathy to occur, all four components need to be
well functioning. Each component, and conse-
quently empathy as a whole, involves skills that can
be learned.
The purpose of this study was to examine the
relationship between social workers empathy and
level of (a) burnout, (b) STS, and (c) compassion
satisfaction. The authors hypothesized that the com-
ponents of empathy would be significant predictors
of lower levels of burnout and STS, and higher lev-
els of compassion satisfaction.
METHOD
Data Collection
Field instructors from a large southwestern univer-
sitys school of social work were invited via e-mail to
participate in an online, Qualtrics-based survey
(Qualtrics Online Survey Software, 2014). Field in-
structors were community-based practitioners who
voluntarily supervised social work students in their
field placements. Field instructors were asked to sup-
port a snowball sampling technique by forwarding
the invitation e-mail to other services providers in
their agencies or communities. Data were collected in
July and August of 2011. A total of 185 participants
responded. Of those, 173 reported having at least one
degree in social work, and these were included in the
analysis for the current study. The study was approved
by the universitys institutional review board.
Measures
The online survey included demographic items,
such as gender, race or ethnicity, age, and highest
level of education. Participants also responded to
items about their professional career and current
work: years they had worked as a social services
professional overall; the nature of their current work
(such as child welfare, behavioral health); whether
their current work was in a direct practice position,
administrative or supervisory position, or a combi-
nation of both; and years they had worked in their
current position.
Participants also completed measures of empa-
thy,burnout, compassion satisfaction, and STS. The
Empathy Assessment Index (EAI) is a valid and reli-
able 20-item, self-report instrument (Gerdes, Geiger,
Lietz, Wagaman, & Segal, 2012; Lietz et al., 2011)
204
that includes four subscales measuring the components
of interpersonal empathy (affective response, self
other awareness, perspective taking, and emotion
regulation), with five items each. Items were measured
on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 1=never
to 6=always. The Professional Quality of Life Scale
(ProQOL) consists of three subscales: Compassion
Satisfaction, Burnout, and STS. Each subscale has
10 questions. As conceptualized by the scale devel-
opers, both burnout and STS are components of a
latent construct, compassion fatigue. Each item was
measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from
1=never to 5=very often, and included items such
as I am preoccupied with more than one person I
serve. The ProQOL has been identified as a reliable
and valid measure of compassion satisfaction and the
components of compassion fatigue (Stamm, 2010).
Sample
The sample (N=173) was predominantly female
(87.8 percent, n=151) and white/Caucasian (73.8
percent, n=127). Twelve percent (n=21) identified
as Latino; 5.8 percent (n=10) identified as African
American. Participants ranged in age from 20 years
to over 70 years, with a majority (58 percent,
n=101) being between the ages of 40 and 60. A
majority of the sample (97.1 percent, n=168) had
a masters degree or higher, and 93.6 percent
(n=161) of the participants highest degrees were
in social work. Time working in the profession
ranged from two to over 40 years, with approxi-
mately 75 percent of the participants (n=131) hav-
ing been in the profession for 10 years or longer.
Participants reported working in a broad range of
contexts at the time of the survey, with the most
common being child welfare (12.1 percent, n=20),
behavioral health (18.8 percent, n=31), health or
medical services (18.8 percent, n=31), and school-
based services (8.5 percent, n=14). Other work
contexts reported by participants included policy/
advocacy, early childhood development, crisis re-
sponse services, aging, and veteran services. The
largest proportion of participants (42.1 percent,
n=69) reported working in direct practice, with an
additional 33.5 percent (n=55) reporting doing su-
pervisory or administrative work, and 24.4 percent
(n=40) reporting both. Time having worked in
their current positions ranged from less than a year
to 28 years. The majority (58 percent, n=93) re-
ported having been in their current position five
years or less.
Social Work Volume 60, Number 3 July 2015
ANALYTIC STRATEGY
Multiple regression was used to analyze three
modelsone with the dependent variable burn-
out, a second with the dependent variable compas-
sion satisfaction, and a third with the dependent
variable STS. Each model included as independent
variables the four component scores of empathy
from the EAIaffective response, selfother aware-
ness, perspective taking, and emotion regulation
and controls for time in the social services field
overall, time in current position, and type of work
performed in current position (direct practice,
supervisory/administrative, or both). Current work
type (both direct practice and supervisory/admin-
istrative) and current work type (supervisory/
administrative) were created as dummy variables,
which were compared with a reference group
ofcurrent work type (direct practice). The depen-
dent and independent variables are summarized in
Table1.
RESULTS
The model results are summarized in Table2. In the
first model, with burnout as the dependent vari-
able, 24 percent of the variance (R2=.28, adjusted
R2=.24) was accounted for by the independent vari-
ables listed earlier [F(8, 142)=7.12, p<.01], with
emotion regulation [=.36, t(142)=4.08, p<.05]
being the only predictor with significant contribu-
tions individually. In the second model predicting
compassion satisfaction, 20 percent (R2=.24, ad-
justed R2=.20) of the variance was explained by
the model [F(8, 140)=5.70, p<.01], with self
other awareness [=.24, t(140)=2.45, p<.05] and
affective response [=.19, t(140)=2.50, p<.05] as
the only significant predictors. The models for both
burnout and compassion satisfaction varied signifi-
cantly by time overall in a social services profession.
Those having been in the profession longer were
associated with lower levels of burnout and higher
levels of compassion satisfaction. In the third model,

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics for Independent and Dependent Variables

Variable N Range M SD
Selfother awareness component score 172 3.46 4.88 0.52
Emotion regulation component score 172 3.25.8 4.60 0.52
Affective response component score 172 3.26 4.30 0.48
Perspective taking component score 173 3.46 4.70 0.52
Years working as a social services professional 173 341 18.58 9.75
Years in current position 160 129 7.31 5.63
Compassion satisfaction (t score) 164 0.1763.93 49.76 10.11
Burnout (t score) 168 30.6276.79 49.81 9.69
Secondary traumatic stress (t score) 171 33.1285.43 49.61 9.59

Table2: Multiple Regression Analyses Predicting Social Worker Burnout, Compassion

Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic Stress
Model 1: Model 2: Compassion Model 3: Secondary
Burnout Satisfaction Traumatic Stress
Variable B (beta) B (beta) B (beta)
Intercept 105.70 5.57 77.15
Selfother awareness 3.21 (.17) 4.51* (.24) 4.87* (.26)
Emotion regulation 6.6* (.36) 3.00 (.16) 3.87* (.21)
Affective response 1.43 (.07) 3.92* (.19) 3.09 (.15)
Perspective taking 0.17 (.01) 0.20 (.01) 0.05 (.01)
Years as social services professional 0.16* (.16) 0.18* (.19) 0.02 (.02)
Years in current position 0.10 (.06) 0.01 (.01) 0.16 (.10)
Current work type (both direct practice and 1.39 (.06) 2.51 (.11) 0.18 (.01)
supervisory/administrative)
Current work type (supervisory/administrative) 0.85 (.04) 0.50 (.02) 3.42* (.17)
Adjusted R2 0.24* 0.20* 0.14*
F 7.12 (8, 142) 5.70 (8, 140) 4.34 (8, 145)
*p<.05.

Wagaman et al. / The Role of Empathy in Burnout, Compassion Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic Stress 205
with STS as the dependent variable, 14 percent
(R2=.19, adjusted R2=.14) of the variance was that reflect poor boundary setting and maintenance.
accounted for [F(8, 145)=4.34, p<.01) with self
other awareness [=.26, t(145)=2.65, p<.01] and nificant predictive value for higher levels of compas-
emotion regulation [=.21, t(145)=2.31, p<.05] sion satisfaction, is thought to work in concert with
as individually significant predictors. The model for
STS varied significantly by the type of work done.
Those in supervisory- or administrative-only posi-
tions had lower levels of STS than those in direct
practice positions, all else being held constant.
The findings of this study indicate a significant
relationship between empathy and both compassion
satisfaction and compassion fatigue among social
work practitioners. Selfother awareness and emo-
tion regulation, which are cognitive components of
empathy, appear to be significant contributors to
components of compassion fatigue as compared with
the other components of empathy. In contrast, af-
fective response, which is a physiological component
of empathy, was identified as a significant contribu-
tor to compassion satisfaction. These findings do not
vary significantly by time in the current position.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study suggest that there is a
significant opportunity to use empathy in the prep-
aration of social work practitioners to cope with the
factors related to burnout and STS. The study find-
ings also suggest that empathy may be a factor con-
tributing to the maintenance of the well-being and
longevity of social workers in the field.
It is important to explore the specific components
of empathy for which there was a significant predic-
tive value, to understand the relationships that they
suggest. Selfother awareness is a cognitive compo-
nent of empathy that emphasizes the ability to sep-
arate oneself from others, including ones thoughts
and feelings, which is the process of setting and
maintaining boundaries. The results of this study
suggest that attention to specifically training social
workers in selfother awareness, both before enter-
ing the field and while in the field, could serve as a
protective factor against STS. Similarly, the relation-
ship between selfother awareness and compassion
satisfaction, as indicated by the findings, suggests
that selfother awareness training may help to pre-
vent burnout and STS by increasing compassion
satisfaction. Empathy can help social workers main-
tain professional boundaries by training them to be
mindful of selfother awareness and emotion regula-
tion in their everyday practice, which may also pro-
206
tect social workers from decision-making patterns
Affective response, which was found to have sig-
the cognitive component of emotion regulation.
Unregulated affective response is seen as having the
potential to create distress in an individual. The find-
ings of this study suggest that affective response has
a positive relationship with compassion satisfaction.
Social workers may need to be able to share emotion
with clients. This process of affect sharing, while
often contextualized in terms of trauma and pain,
would also include sharing in a clients joy and suc-
cesses. Such affect sharing may be important to the
maintenance of a feeling of satisfaction in ones work,
which is linked to a lower risk of compassion fatigue.
Emotion regulation, a cognitive component of
empathy, and its association in this study with burn-
out and STS suggest that the ability to regulate the
emotional responses to clients that are physiological
in nature equips social workers to protect themselves
from repeated exposure to those who have experi-
enced pain and trauma. Emotion regulation is a skill
that can be learned and honed through training.
The identified relationship between the type of
work (direct versus administrative or supervisory
practice) and STS is an important reminder that
supervisors who move out of engagement in direct
client contact need to remain aware and sensitive to
the vulnerability of their supervisees to developing
STS. From an organizational perspective, this may
suggest a need for supervisors to maintain some di-
rect client work or engage in empathy-related train-
ing to better understand the experiences of their
supervisees.
Finally, the fact that the relationships identified
between empathy and burnout and compassion sat-
isfaction varied significantly by time in the profes-
sion is an important finding, particularly given that
more years in the profession overall was associated
with lower levels of burnout and higher levels of
compassion satisfaction. This finding suggests that
social work professionals can learn from strategies
used by long-term social workers that prevent burn-
out and maintain compassion satisfaction. Clearly,
burnout can be prevented and managed across ones
professional career. Given that issues of retention
are important in the profession, this finding has
important implications for intervention with social
workers, particularly in those areas of the profession
Social Work Volume 60, Number 3 July 2015
found to be a greater risk for burnout and STS, such
as child welfare (Sprang, Craig, & Clark, 2011).
Identification of practice settings with increased risk
of burnout, STS, and turnover may provide direc-
tion for targeted efforts to enhance social workers
empathy where there is greatest need.
Study Limitations
Primary limitations of this study are that the sample
was drawn from one community and was fairly ho-
mogenous in terms of race and gender, limiting gen-
eralizability. Second, despite our attempts to identify
the type of work and context, the data were not able
to differentiate between those whose work direct
ly exposed them to crisis, those whose work di-
rectly exposed them to trauma, and those whose
work directly exposed them to both crisis and trau-
ma on a regular basis; or between those who worked
in supervisory positions and those who worked in
strictly administrative positions. No data were col-
lected on environmental factors that the research
literature suggests may contribute to burnout, com-
passion satisfaction, and STS, such as workload; per-
ception of support for setting boundaries and
engaging in self-care; and having positive, supportive
relationships with ones supervisor and colleagues. And
finally, given the cross-sectional nature of the study,
no causal relationship can be drawn from the findings.
Implications
Previous research has emphasized the environ-
mental or organizational factors related to burnout,
with less attention to individual factors that may be
within the control of social work practitioners. Em-
pathy and its components, particularly the cognitive
aspects, can be taught and learned by social work
practitioners. Such training does not have to solely
occur in social work education; it can be conducted
in practice settings. Strategies such as mindfulness
techniques and emphasis on boundary setting are
ways that social workers can tap into the process of
affect sharing and increase their selfother awareness.
To increase the capacity for emotion regulation, we
must first recognize the emotion, understand the
meaning and context of the emotion, and then use
specific strategies to reduce the intensity of the emo-
tion as necessary. Some strategies include practicing
self-talk or verbal cues, physically removing oneself
from a situation to a more comfortable or familiar
setting, and practicing effortful control of ones
physical or verbal reactions.
Wagaman et al. / The Role of Empathy in Burnout, Compassion Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic Stress
Training in these techniques can be pursued by
individual social workers, as well as by organizations
and human services systems. Such training may also
be incorporated into continuing education require-
ments for license renewal as a way to emphasize its
importance throughout ones career. The findings
of this study suggest that future research should fur-
ther examine the relationships between empathy
and the components of compassion fatigue over
time and in diverse samples, as well as explore indi-
vidually oriented and organizationally oriented
interventions designed to prevent or minimize ex-
periences of burnout and STS. Empathy is an im-
portant factor that can be incorporated into a dually
focused intervention.
Social workers are vulnerable to burnout and
STS. This study demonstrates that empathy is a vi-
able skill and strategy in buffering against the nega-
tive effects of compassion fatigue and may increase
compassion satisfaction, longevity, and personal and
professional well-being. Empathy can and should be
explored, cultivated, taught, and learned in formal
educational settings, professional development pro-
grams, and continuing education for social workers
to improve work with clients, self-preservation, and
organizational outcomes.
REFERENCES
Awa, W. L., Plaumann, M., & Walter, U. (2010). Burnout
prevention: A review of intervention programs.
Patient Education and Counseling, 78(2), 184190.
Batson, C. D. (2011). These things called empathy: Eight
related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety &
W.Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy
(pp.315). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Batson, C. D., Hkansson Eklund, J., Chermok, V. L.,
Hoyt, J. L., & Ortiz, B. G. (2007). An additional
antecedent of empathic concern: Valuing the welfare
of the person in need. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 93, 6574.
Boyas, J., Wind, L. H., & Kang, S-Y. (2012). Exploring
the relationship between employment-based social
capital, job stress, burnout, and intent to leave
among child protection workers: An age-based path
analysis model. Children and Youth Services Review,
34, 5062.
Bride, B. E. (2007). Prevalence of secondary traumatic
stress among social workers. Social Work, 52, 6370.
Bride, B. E., Radey, M., & Figley, C. R. (2007).
Measuring compassion fatigue. Clinical Social Work
Journal, 35, 155163.
Burke, R. J., & Deszca, E. (1986). Correlates of psycho
logical burnout phases among police officers. Human
Relations, 39, 487501.
Council on Social Work Education. (2014). Educational and
accreditation standards. Alexandria, VA: Author.
de Waal, F. (2010). The age of empathy: Natures lessons for a
kinder society. New York: Random House.
Decety, J. (2011). Dissecting the neural mechanisms
mediating empathy. Emotion Review, 3(1), 92108.
207
Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). The empathic brain
and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations:
Implications for intervention across different clinical
conditions. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1(22), 121.
Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic
responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In
J.Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of
empathy (pp. 7183). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg,
L.S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 4349.
Figley, C. R. (2002). Compassion fatigue: Psychotherapists
chronic lack of self care. Journal of Clinical Psychology,
58, 14331441.
Gerdes, K. E., Geiger, J. M., Lietz, C. A., Wagaman,
M.A., & Segal, E. A. (2012). Examination of
known-groups validity for the Empathy Assessment
Index (EAI): Differences in EAI scores between social
service providers and recipients at community
treatment agencies. Journal of the Society for Social Work
and Research, 3(2), 94112.
Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A., & Segal, E. A. (2011).
Measuring empathy in the 21st century: Develop
ment of an empathy index rooted in social cognitive
neuroscience and social justice. Social Work Research,
35, 8393.
Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. (2011). Importance of empathy
for social work practice: Integrating new science.
Social Work, 56, 141148.
Gibbons, S. B. (2011). Understanding empathy as a
complex construct: A review of the literature. Clinical
Social Work Journal, 39, 243252.
Jacobson, J. M., Rothschild, A., Mirza, F., & Shapiro, M.
(2013). Risk for burnout and compassion fatigue and
potential for compassion satisfaction among clergy:
Implications for social work and religious
organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 39,
455468.
Kahill, S. (1988). Symptoms of professional burnout: A
review of the empirical evidence. Canadian
Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 29(3), 284297.
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (2008). Moral judgment and
moral neuroscience: Intersections, definitions, and
issues. Child Development Perspectives, 2(1), 16.
Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., & Hartman, J. L. (2013). Exploring
individual and organizational factors contributing to
compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress,
and burnout in domestic violence service providers.
Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4(2),
114130.
Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways
to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent
and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours.
Journal of Adolescence, 27, 703716.
Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and
measurement. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, &
B.H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and
intervention: A guide for health and social scientists
(pp.2952). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996). A meta-analytic
examination of the correlates of the three dimensions
of job burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2),
123133.
Lietz, C. A., Gerdes, K. E., Sun, F., Geiger, J. M.,
Wagaman, M. A., & Segal, E. A. (2011). The
Empathy Assessment Index (EAI): A confirmatory
factor analysis of a multidimensional model of
empathy. Journal of the Society for Social Work and
Research, 2(2), 104124. doi:10.5243/jsswr.2011.6
Lloyd, C., King, R., & Chenoweth, L. (2002). Social
work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental
Health, 11(3), 255265.
208
Maslach, C. (2003). Burnout: The cost of caring. Los Alto:
ISHK.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Maslach, C., & Schaufeli, W. B. (1993). Historical and
conceptual development of burnout. In
W.B.Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marek (Eds.),
Professional burnout: Recent developments in theory and
research (pp. 116). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001).
Jobburnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1),
397422.
McCarthy, W. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1999). Negative aspects
of therapy: Client perceptions of therapists social
influence, burnout, and quality of care. Journal of
Social Issues, 55(1), 3350.
McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., & Parnes, A. L. (2006).
Understanding prosocial behavior: The impact of
empathy and gender among African American
adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39,
135137.
National Institute of Mental Health. (2014). Symptoms of
traumatic stress (NIH Publication No. 086388).
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Neumann, M., Bensing, J., Mercer, S., Ernstmann, N.,
Ommen, O., & Pfaff, H. (2009). Analyzing the
nature and specific effectiveness of clinical
empathy: A theoretical overview and contribution
towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient
Education and Counseling, 74(3), 339346.
Newell, J. M., & MacNeil, G. A. (2010). Professional
burnout, vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress,
and compassion fatigue: A review of theoretical
terms, risk factors, and preventive methods for
clinicians and researchers. Best Practice in Mental
Health, 6(2), 5768.
OHalloran, M. S., & OHalloran, T. (2001). Secondary
traumatic stress in the classroom: Ameliorating stress
in graduate students. Teaching in Psychology, 28(2),
9297.
Perkins, E., & Sprang, G. (2013). Results from the Pro-
QOL-IV for substance abuse counselors working
with offenders. International Journal of Mental Health &
Addiction, 11(2), 199213.
Pooler, D. K., Wolfer, T. A., & Freeman, M. L. (2014).
Finding joy in social work: Interpersonal sources.
Families in Society, 95(1), 3442.
Pryce, J. G., Shackelford, K. K., & Pryce, D. H. (2007).
Secondary traumatic stress and the child welfare professional.
Chicago: Lyceum Books.
Qualtrics Online Survey Software. (2014). Provo, UT:
Qualtrics, LLC. Retrieved from http://www
.qualtrics.com
Schaufeli, W., & Enzmann, D. (1998). The burnout
companion to study and practice: A critical analysis.
Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Sprang, G., Craig, C., & Clark, J. (2011). Secondary
traumatic stress and burnout in child welfare workers:
A comparative analysis of occupational distress across
professional groups. Child Welfare, 90(6), 149168.
Stamm, B. H. (Ed.). (1999). Secondary traumatic stress:
Self-care issues for clinicians, researchers, & educators (2nd
ed.). Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press.
Stamm, B. H. (2010). The concise ProQOL manual (2nd ed.).
Pocatello, ID: ProQOL.org.
Toussaint, L., & Webb, J. R. (2005). Gender differences in
the relationship between empathy and forgiveness.
Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 673685.
van Heugten, K. (2011). Social work under pressure: How to
overcome stress, fatigue and burnout in the workplace.
London: Jessica Kingsley.
Social Work Volume 60, Number 3 July 2015
Zimering, R., Munroe, J., & Gulliver, S. B. (2003).
Secondary traumatization in mental health care
providers. Psychiatric Times, 20(4), 4347.

M. Alex Wagaman, PhD, MSW, is assistant professor, School

of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1000 Floyd
Avenue, PO Box 842027, Richmond, VA 232842027;
e-mail: mawagaman@vcu.edu. Jennifer M. Geiger, PhD, is
postdoctoral fellow, Arizona State University, Phoenix. Clara
Shockley, MSW, LCSW-C, CPC-AD, is a doctoral student,
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. Elizabeth A.
Segal, PhD, is professor, Arizona State University, Phoenix.
Original manuscript received June 18, 2014
Final revision received September 15, 2014
Accepted September 22, 2014
Advance Access Publication May 1, 2015

Wagaman et al. / The Role of Empathy in Burnout, Compassion Satisfaction, and Secondary Traumatic Stress 209