Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stockholm 2005
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This thesis was written to fulfill the requirement for the award of M.Sc.
degree in Real Estate Management at the Royal Institute of Technology,
Sweden. I would like to thank first and foremost to the Almighty God for
giving me the strength and patience to reach this far.
I am indebted to my project supervisor Prof. Hans Lind for his time, useful
comments, guidance, follow up and suggestions through out this work. Many
thanks to Hans Hede of RTK for his time and discussion about Stockholm
County and Prof. Urban Dick Vestbro for his inspiration, interesting and
useful information.
My sincerest gratitude to my parents, Bekea and Etu and to my brothers for
their support in everyway. I hope I would be able to repay you, in time...
Finally, my appreciation to all my friends here and back home and to all
those who are all part of my Stockholm experience.
Haregewoin
April 2005
i
MASTER OF SCIENCE THESIS No. 294
Department of Infrastructure
Section of Building and Real Estate Economics
.
Title: Urbanization and Urban Sprawl
Author: Haregewoin Bekele
Supervisor: Hans Lind
Keywords: Urban sprawl, urbanization, land-use,
population, leapfrogging
Abstract
The natural history of urbanization has not yet been written, for
only a small part of the preliminary work has been done. But it dates
back from the ancient times of the origin of cities. In the process,
people witnessed the evolution of cities from their ancestral form (the
village) to small port /rail based towns and to cities of today with sky-
scrapers adorning landscapes. At the end of the 20th century, urban
growth was rapidly pushing cities further and further out while on the
21st century the dominant form of city living became based on the
automobile. This latest stretched form of the city with low density at
the periphery is sometimes called sprawl. There has been no clear con-
sensus regarding what exactly urban sprawl is or how it is caused be-
cause sprawl is one name for many situations. Although many scholars
tried to come up with explanations of the term, the central component
of most definitions and most peoples understanding of sprawl is this:
Sprawl is the spreading out of a city and its suburbs over more and
more rural land at the periphery of an urban area. This involves the
conversion of open space (rural land) into built-up, developed land over
time. 1
While many factors may have helped in explaining urban sprawl
and its causes, it ultimately has always been a population and land-use
issue. This paper will outline possible conditions and impacts of urban
sprawl. Using a variety of discussions and arguments the founding is
that sprawl is a result of inter-related social, economical, physical and
political factors. Hence, different pattern of sprawl arise for different
areas. The paper also includes discussion of urban sprawl for four
selected cities.
1
http://www.sprawlcity.org/defining.html
ii
Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background and Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Objectives of Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 Theoretical Framework 5
2.1 The Term Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 Causes of Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2.1 Population . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.2.2 Land-use and Land Consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2.3 Population and Density . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
2.3 Effects of Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3.1 Positive Sides of Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3.2 Negative Sides of Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.4 Solutions Against Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.5 The Idea of Smart Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
iii
4.2.3 City Structure and Urbanization . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.2.4 The Need for Housing and Urban Sprawl . . . . . . . . 35
4.2.5 Planning and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.3 Stockholm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.3.1 Overview of Urbanization and Sprawl in the Swedish
Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
4.3.2 Selected Case City: Stockholm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.3.3 City Structure and Urbanization . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.3.4 The Need for Housing and Urban Sprawl . . . . . . . . 39
4.3.5 Planning and Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.4 Los Angeles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.4.1 Overview of Urbanization and Sprawl in the US Context 42
4.4.2 Selected Case City: Los Angeles, California . . . . . . 44
4.4.3 City Structure and Urbanization . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.4.4 The Need for Housing and Urban Sprawl . . . . . . . . 47
4.4.5 Planning and policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
References 54
List of Tables
1 Emergence, History and Expectation of Mega Cities around
the World (in millions). Source: UN Habitat 2000. . . . . . . . 26
2 Growth of Urban Population and Urbanized Area in China . . 27
3 Increase in Beijing Urban Built-up Area 1949-1996 . . . . . . 31
4 Major Land Cover Change for Addis Ababa and Surrounding
Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5 Swedens Growth of Urban and Total Population 1990-2010 . . 38
6 Land use, Stockholm Region 2003. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
iv
7 US Urban and Rural Population Distribution . . . . . . . . . 43
8 Los Angeles Region Increase in Built Up Area . . . . . . . . . 45
9 Los Angeles Population and Housing Figures 1970-1998 . . . . 47
List of Figures
1 Use of Automobile and Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2 Costs of Sprawl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3 Worlds Urban Population Growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
4 Selected Indicators for the Urban and Rural Population by
Major Area, 1950-2030. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
5 World Urbanization and Income Growth, 1970-95 . . . . . . . 24
6 Rapid Urban Expansion of Beijing through the years 1949-1994 30
7 Settlement Development of the Stockholm from 1910 to 1999. 40
8 Los Angeles Region: Change in Urbanized Area, 1970-1990. . 46
v
1 Introduction
1.1 Background and Problem Formulation
Through most of history the human population has lived a rural lifestyle.
However, in the first decade of the 20th century this trend started to change
and the world is still becoming urbanized as thousands of people migrate to
cities. Urbanization is now a rising trend seen all over the world, especially
in an alarming rate in developing countries. This makes cities grow both
in number and in physical size. In quite a lot of instances, the percentage
increase in population is accompanied by more than proportional percentage
increase of an urbanized area. This is an indication that the two growth rates
differ and urban area grows in a more rapid pace. Because of the different
activities and processes that take place in the urban ecosystem everyday, the
subject of urbanization and urban sprawl has drawn attention from ecologists,
urban planners, civil engineers, sociologists, administrators, policy makers,
and finally to common urban or rural resident.
Aristotle once wrote that men come together in cities to live, but stay in
them to live the good life. "Cities are now junctions in the flows of people,
information, finance and freight....Theyre less and less places where people
live and work " says Nigel Harris, a professor of development planning (Ellis
and Harris, 2004). The subject of urban sprawl by itself is so broad that it
can only allow one to just tap into many resources.
In most cases, urban sprawl is regarded as one of the major effects of
urban growth. As a land-use phenomenon, it is typically characterized in the
following way in American literatures.
1
Repetitive one story development
2
its effect in urban land-use change in developing and developed countries
perspective is discussed. In addition, the objective is
1.3 Methodology
This paper is mostly based on previously written material and tries to dis-
cuss the concept in two ways: general literature review and comparative case
discussion. The research method applied here is qualitative in which the re-
searcher explores relationships using textual rather than quantitative data.
Case study, observation, and ethnography are considered forms of qualitat-
ive research. Results that are observed or gained are not usually considered
generalizable, but are often transferable. As the aim is to better understand
the concept, books, different research papers, articles and brochures were
considered. Identification of key characteristics and analysis were made from
secondary sources. Annual reports, documents, journals, different books and
research papers on various relevant urban issues were reviewed. Most data
and figures are from non-governmental organisations such as United Nation
and its branch offices that deal with population, urban and environment
related issues. Additional facts and figures are taken from Country Fact
and regional and national statistics offices. It should be noted that data is
less plentiful and less reliable for developing countries.To a minor extent, in-
formal discussions were held with professionals in planning offices, professors
and lecturers in Urban Planning division, KTH for a general overview. The
contents and conclusions are also based on a variety of documents, research
reports, conference papers etc.
For better understanding of differences and comparative discussion four
case cities are chosen: Beijing, Stockholm, Addis Ababa and Los Angeles.
They were chosen considering the economic status of the areas in the cat-
egory of developed/developing country. But each city has its uniqueness that
makes it interesting to be researched deeper. Beijing is the capital city of
the most populous country in the whole world. Stockholm is the greenest
3
and the most nature friendly city in Europe with almost no urban sprawl.
Addis Ababa is the capital city of the most populous country in Africa with
rapid urbanization and declining growth. Almost every article or research
paper about urban sprawl does not discuss the topic without mentioning Los
Angeles. It is believed that Los Angeles is a model of growth in a smarter
way. On the contrary, it is also a model of one of the worst sprawled cit-
ies. "For many Americans, Los Angeles is a sprawling model of what they
dont want their city to become..." 2 . The city stopped individual sprawl by
increasing density (number of people per area) and is now the most densely
populated city in America.
The organizational layout of the whole paper is as follows: The first
section (chapter 2) will serve as a theoretical framework and will describe
the term urban sprawl in detail and discuss how and what causes sprawl.
Effects and solutions are also suggested here. The second section (chapter 3)
will focus on global urbanization trends and related topics. Tables and figures
from UN are presented for further clarification. The third section (chapter 4)
aims at describing four different cities. Urbanization, urban sprawl, causes,
effects, planning and policies are discussed for each city and a general but
non-restrictive analysis is included. The last section (chapter 5) summarizes
and concludes the observations.
2
www.sprawlcity.com/losangeles.html
4
2 Theoretical Framework
2.1 The Term Defined
Sprawl in simple terms is just spreading out of a city and its suburbs over
more and more rural land at the periphery of an urban area while in reality
it is a complex phenomenon that mean different things in different areas and
conditions. Early uses of the term suggest that it consumes excessive space
in an uncontrolled, disorderly manner leading to poor distribution and loss
of open spaces, high demand for transportation, and social segregation. This
definition has not changed much through time. Modern usage of the term
sprawl was coined by Earle Draper, one of the first city planners in the
United States in 1937 (Black, 1996)3 . Since then, the issue became popular
and concerns continue to grow with different measures introduced to combat
it in one way or another.
As the word sprawl is a multidimensional phenomenon, it has caused
much confusion. Possible mathematical regressions attempting to explain
sprawl from land use perspective such as the degree of compactness did not
generate statistically significant results (Wassmer, 2005) and hence the diffi-
culty to mathematically define the term.
The Vermont Forum on Sprawl defines sprawl as: dispersed development
outside of compact urban and village centres along highways and in rural
counryside.4
In her report, Revisiting Sprawl: Lessons From the Past, Burgess (1998)
defined sprawl as "...expanding physical development, at decreasing densities,
in metropolitan regions, where the spatial growth exceeds population growth" 5
On the other hand, The Oxford English Dictionary (2001) defines the
word as "the straggling expansion of an indeterminate urban or industrial
environment into an adjoining countryside; the area of this advancement."
Here, sprawl as an adjective has been used to describe the pattern of a citys
growth, as a verb- describing the process of that growth, and as a noun-
describing an urban landform.
In yet another instance, a jointly written paper by researchers entitled
Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground (2001) puts forward six general categories of
3
Urban sprawl: Thomas J. Nechyba and Randall P.Walsh
4
http://www.vtsprawl.org/Learnabout/sprawl/whatissprawlmain.htm
5
http://www4.ncsu.edu/ grhess/papers/sprawl.pdf
5
defining sprawl from an analysis in social science and planning perspective.6
1. Sprawl is defined as one or more existing patterns of development.
Those most frequently mentioned are low-density, leapfrogging, distance
to central facilities, dispersion of employment and residential development,
and continuous strip development. This definition characterizes land use
conditions, and it is conceivable that continuous, development (ribbon de-
velopment along corridors), and leapfrog development are two different kinds
of sprawl (Harvey and Clark 1965). Other development patterns frequently
characterized as sprawl in different literatures include large lot single-family
residential, radial discontinuity, single land use or physical separation of land
uses and widespread commercial development.
2. Sprawl is defined as a process of development that occurs over some
period of time as an urban area expands.
This suggests that some parts of an urban area may pass through a sprawl
stage before eventually thickening and diversifying so they can no longer be
characterized as sprawl, at least by those authors who used to signify a stage
or process of development. They hose sprawl as a verb, rather than a noun
connoting a condition. But there is little in the literature to indicate when
sprawl metamorphoses into non-sprawl.
3. Sprawl is defined by an example, by reference to the average density
of a particular urban area.
In some literatures, sprawl is frequently defined by one or more examples
of low-density or scattered patterns of urban development. Los Angeles is
usually named the best exemplary definition of sprawled city. The flexibility
of definition by example makes it possible to include all sorts of development
patterns, from planned communities with clustered housing and mixed uses
to exurban rural estates.
4. Sprawl is used as an aesthetic judgment about a general urban devel-
opment pattern.
Generally, sprawl is widely known as ugly development with tendency to
discontinuity and haphazard layout.
5. Sprawl is a cause of an externality, such as high automobile depend-
ence, isolation of the poor.
Traffic congestion (Downs 1999 and Black 1996 (Vermont Forum on sprawl
1999) environmental contamination (Sierra Club 1999), income and racial se-
gregation of neighbourhoods (Downs 1998), the jobs-housing mismatch (Or-
6
http://www.fanniemaefoundation.org/programs/hpd/pdf/HPD_1204_galster.pdf
6
field 1997), conversion of farmland to urban uses (U.S. General Accounting
Office, 1999), and civic alienation (Popenoe 1979), are among problems of
urban life and have been attributed to sprawl. But they basically describe
what sprawl does (or is supposed to do) rather than what it is.
6. Sprawl is the consequence or effect of some independent variable, such
as fragmented local government, poor planning, or exclusionary zoning.
Sprawl occurs as a consequence of the fragmentation of control over land-
use in metropolitan areas.
As the term so widely used, all descriptions of sprawl leave one to search
for something more definite and solid. Questions like how far should a devel-
opment has to stretch, how dense or thin should it be in order to be called
sprawl will be left unanswered. But with an empirical definition it would
be easier to conduct a discussion of the forces and factors that cause certain
patterns of development and face the consequences that follow from certain
urban planning forms for different population groups, such as a regions poor
residents. This can make it easier to tackle problems that can arise from
poor land management and therefore lead one to best and effective usage of
the limited resource: land.
Thus generally speaking, as a noun, sprawl implies a condition character-
izing an urban area or part of it at a particular time. Based on descriptions
of conditions characterizing sprawl in literature and amplified by observation
and experience, the following conceptual definition is suggested (Galster,
Hanson, R.Ratcliffe, Wolman, Coleman and Freihage, 2001).
Sprawl (n.) is a pattern of land use in an urbanized area that exhibits low
levels of some combination of eight distinct dimensions: density, continuity,
concentration, compactness, centrality, nuclearity, diversity and proximity.
In the discussion throughout this paper, this same combined definition
will be used since it is flexible and non-restrictive. It should be pointed
out that all development is not sprawl and all sprawl does not have the
same characteristics or dimensions. The literature will, therefore, try to
discuss about urbanization, urban sprawl and the factors behind it in different
contexts of the developed and developing world. Given that there is no agreed
comprehensive definition, it is not surprising that there is also little agreement
on the characteristics, causes and impacts of sprawl.
7
2.2 Causes of Sprawl
Generally, population growth, rise in household income, subsidization of in-
frastructure investments like roads, ineffective land-use, excessive growth,
social problems in central cities and poor land policies are taken to be the
main causes of sprawl. One of the main factors that help in explaining the
increasing sub-urbanization of population in rich countries is the demand for
larger suburban lots. With rise in household incomes, people who move into
the suburbs are motivated to a significant degree by the desire for more living
space. Between 1950 and 1980, one-half of the increased sub-urbanization in
America can be explained by people getting richer (Glaeser and Kahn, 2003).
Compared to people who live in cities, suburbanites live in larger houses, on
larger lots and use automobiles more often. Developed countries like USA
also invest a lot of money on road and transport infrastructures encouraging
the use of private cars. The high correlation between using automobiles and
living in low-density edge cities may not prove that cars caused sprawl but
is an indication that the two strongly complement each other (see Figure 1).
8
Figure 1: Use of Automobile and Sprawl
2.2.1 Population
Often, one comes across population growth as the main cause of urban prob-
lems and urban sprawl. The global population has doubled over the past
40 years with remarkable shifts in geographical distribution (State of World
Population, 1999). Africa has grown the fastest. Asia, by far the most popu-
lous region, has more than doubled in size (to over 3.6 billion), as has Latin
America and the Caribbean. In contrast, the population of Northern Amer-
ica has grown by only 50 per cent, and Europes has increased by only 20
per cent and is now roughly stable.
Over the second half of the twentieth century, the total population of the
world increased at an average annual rate of 1.75 per cent. In comparison,
the world urban population increased at an average annual rate of 2.68 per
cent (UN). The difference between these two rates of growth, that is, between
the growth rate of the urban population and that of the total population, is
the rate of growth of the proportion urban. Thus, between 1950 and 2000,
9
the world population urbanized rapidly, rising from 30 percent in 1950 to 47
percent in 2000. As a result of these unprecedented trends, the population
of the world, which during most of human history has lived mainly in rural
settlements and grew very slowly, is on the verge of becoming more urban
than rural for the first time in history.
An increase in a countrys urban population can be due to three causes:
the natural growth rate of the urban population, the re-classification of rural
settlements as they grow and reach a certain number that makes them cities
and towns, and rural-urban migration. Although data was unavailable to
distinguish among the three, a 1979 study showed that in 29 developing
countries, between 1960 and 1970, about 61 percent of urban growth resulted
from natural growth- the excess of births over deaths. Of greatest interest
especially in more recent years, however, is rural-urban migration, as this
is what is most commonly thought of as urbanization and accounts for 40
percent of urban population increase. 7
Change in land-use can produce a change in quality of life for those
living within the landscape. This alters the attractiveness of living in the
countryside compared to urban life and, therefore, affects the net migration
between urban and rural locations. For many years though, rural-urban
migration was viewed favourably in the economic development literature.
Migration was thought to be a natural process in which surplus labour was
gradually withdrawn from the rural sector to provide needed manpower for
urban industrial growth process. But it has greatly exceeded rates of job cre-
ation and service provision and became the cause of many of cities political
and social problems. Peoples movement in the 20th century is constrained
by availability of jobs and supply rate of housing. Countries are directing
policies at reducing and through time stopping the flow of people.
Even though all fingers point at population pressure as the key factor for
change in land use and hence urban sprawl, cities with no population growth
were also observed to sprawl (Blankenship, 2001). Therefore, the acre of
land that is sprawled is not proportional to population growth in most cases.
Still, the only way to stop urban crowding and to solve most of the urban
problems of both the developed and developing countries lies in reducing the
overall rate of population growth.
7
World Overpopulation Awareness: www.overpopulation.org/human.html
10
2.2.2 Land-use and Land Consumption
There is a major controversy whether land-use and consumption decisions
are the primary engines of urban sprawl or whether it is continuing popu-
lation boom that provides most of the expansion. Some argue that sprawl
is first and foremost a land-use phenomenon since even an area of static
population can experience sprawl as its built environment is modified in a
sparse, low-density, auto-friendly way pushing city limits further and further
out. A careful analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data found that these two
sprawl factors share equally the blame for some, if not all, of the sprawl in
some regions of the country. Therefore, questions like "Is population growth
or land-use change worse for sprawl?" can only be answered after a deeper
observation of the situation, causes and effects within the area in question.
Cities grow, with or without planning, and develop landscape characteristics
that persist through time determining how they will function. Fulfilling the
resource requirements of a growing population ultimately requires some form
of land-use change in order to provide for food, living space, recreation, infra-
structure development and service provision. Historical constraints on city
size limitation were cost of transport to export goods/ import agricultural
products, the degree of economy of scale relative to market demand and the
cost of carrying on day-to-day activities within the city itself (commuting to
work, delivery of water, disposal of waste and sewage). These were all relaxed
with time. Some possible forces driving land-use and land-cover changes are
population, technology (mainly automobile), political economy and political
structure. Land consumption - the amount of land used per person - is the
inverse of population density, the higher the population the lower the amount
of land used per person.8
In developed countries, one half of increased sub-urbanization between
1950 and 1980 can be explained by increased demand for larger plots of land
per inhabitant. This is because of higher incomes. Increased income also
means high probability of owning a private car and having a ground-floor
house (not apartment) in the outer periphery of the city.
The other alternative reasoning as to why growth of the suburbs has come
about is because people have fled the social problems of the inner city. In
addition, population pressure in city centres enhances the competition for
employment, production and sales and hence some planning policies favour
decentralization and locate firms and residences in the urban fringes creating
8
http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/SprawlAppendixD82603.html
11
edge cities. Urban land use generally expands at the expense of agriculture
as demand for housing grows. This brings about differences between land
consumption in the centre and fringe of the urbanized area and create changes
in land consumption rates through time.
12
addressed. For instance, low density with expensive services for high-income
household. In case of informal settlement, densities maybe very high with
narrow streets and little open space. Density as both numbers of dwellings
per acre of land and as number of individuals per household is high. For
satellite towns there is fluctuating density during working and non-working
hours and weekends affecting the consumption of services and infrastructure.
13
2.3.2 Negative Sides of Sprawl
All sprawl leads to loss of limited resource, which is land. Over the years,
sprawl has directly contributed to the degradation and decline of natural hab-
itats such as wetlands, woodlands and wildlife. It also reduces farmland and
open spaces. Water use and energy consumption will be increased. Sprawl
leads to land-use patterns which are unfavourable to the development of sus-
tainable transport modes and hence, increase the use of private car that in
turn result in increased trip lengths, congestion, increase in fuel consumption
and air pollution. It is in general a threat to ecology. Even though auto-
mobile and truck engines have become far cleaner in recent decades, motor
vehicle emissions are still the leading sources of air pollution. As homes and
businesses spread further and further apart, local governments are forced to
provide for widely spaced services and infrastructure leading to higher costs
and increased tax burden.
It is an economic theory that productivity is much more enhanced with
dense development since ideas move quickly when people are in close proxim-
ity. But when jobs move to the suburbs, people follow them. This may reduce
productivity in the city leading to social loss. In addition, critics charge that
sprawl leads to regional imbalances, such as pulling jobs and people further
away from poor communities, increasing inequality. Sprawl also creates se-
gregation of rich and poor or social isolation in general. The problem lies
not to the people who have moved to the suburbs but rather to the people
who have been left behind. The low-income groups are abandoned in the
downtown because they cannot afford car-based lifestyle. Role of transport
technology can explain this social fragmentation. The much congested and
deteriorated central towns end up being favorable places for crime and social
unrest.
14
Figure 2: Costs of Sprawl
15
both unemployment and sprawl. Other solutions are;
A. Brownfield redevelopment or the reuse of existing land within the city
and concentrating growth
Abandoned building sites such as old schools, industrial land and parking
space may be reused providing alternatives to using virgin land outside of
city limits. This attacks the problem of city sprawl encroaching on new
land outside the city. The problem is that in most cases there are zoning
policies that do not permit such redevelopment. Policies therefore have to be
adjusted by providing incentives for developers to re-use land. Concentrating
growth may be achieved through a variety of methods such as moving the
concentration of population back towards the city centre and not pushing it
outward, away from the core and by promoting the reuse of land within the
cities. This is the same as increasing density in already existing developments
and building upwards rather than spreading horizontally.
B. Use of improved mass public transport systems
Lack of well-developed mass transit system increases dependence on private
means of transport. The advantages that are provided by private means of
transport are highlighted by the fact that the mass transit system in most
cities is non-existent or very poorly developed. While it is true that the
automobile has led to the sub-urbanization of the wealthy, it is not clear
what the solution to this problem should be. One approach might be to
tax car or charge higher parking fees and push the rich back into cities.
Municipalities and concerned bodies can also act on the problem by giving a
lot of attention and allocating the necessary fund for developing mass public
transport modes. Good transportation planning relies less on new highway
construction - which encourages sprawl - and more on mass transit solutions,
such as light rail and commuter trains. In addition, awareness should be
increased among people on the benefits of using mass transport and through
time make it a culture. Some European countries such as Stockholm are
good examples of mass transport culture.
C. Development and use of better and most efficient land use policies
Communities can grow in an efficient manner by using existing infrastructure,
or by building away from natural wildlife resources. For these development
policies can be targeted more towards an already urbanized area.
D. Implement means to decrease or stop migration
In addition to the push factors, the pull factors that attract migrants to cities
other than job opportunities need to be addressed. Improving efficiency of
land use or other proposed solutions would not be effective in the long run
16
if migration continues.
17
are also in use in other states and in some countries. The success of Smart
Growth will ultimately depend on its adaptation to the unique political cul-
tures, market realities and developmental trends. The great differences in
regional growth patterns should be accounted for. Smart Growth can be an
effective anti-sprawl measure in only one-way: by confining more and more
people into existing urbanized areas.
18
3 Global Urbanization Trends
3.1 Urbanization and Urban Growth
Urbanization and urban growth are two different concepts often found in the
literature of urban studies. The distinction should be noted that urbanization
refers to proportion of the national population living in urban areas, and
urban growth refers to an increase in urban population size, independent of
rural population (United Nations Population Division, 2002).
On the other hand, urbanization can be viewed and perceived to mean a
lot of things depending on how it is used. It can be viewed as a characteristic
of the population, as a particular kind of land use and land cover, as well as a
characteristic of social and economic processes and interactions affecting both
population and land (McIntyre et al, 2000). Physical scientists especially
ecologists generally approach definitions of urbanization from the standpoint
of the built environment. To them, density of buildings and impervious
surfaces is as important as population (Long, Rain, and Ratcliffe, 2001).
McIntyre et al (2000), however, noted that among ecologists, a wide variety
of urban definitions have been used in research ranging from any human
alteration of the landscape to more precise definitions based on density and
specified land-use characteristics. In spite of these variations, urbanization
trends are universal. Local factors can speed up or slow down the process,
but it cannot be stopped. Urbanization is not necessarily bad, but the rapid
change brings a lot of economic and social problems that are difficult to
manage. Some agree that it is a consequence of economic development but
it is also a requirement for economic development.
Before 1850, no society could be described as predominantly urbanized
(Marthe, 2001). While the intensive urbanization of most of the developed
countries began within the past 150 years, it emerges late for developing
countries. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, urbanization resulted
from and contributed to industrialization. The result was the movement of
labour force from demographically saturated countryside. In the two worlds
of more developed and less developed countries, the degree and type of urban-
ization contrasts sharply. Unlike the developed world where the urbanization
process was triggered by industrialization, the urbanization process in many
developing countries is characterized by demographic changes such as, rapid
natural population growth and rural-urban migration, which in turn stim-
ulates urban growth. Poor African countries are not capable of managing
19
rapid growth. Planning, land allocation, infrastructure and services are in-
adequate to cope in such situations. As a result, an increasing part of the
urban population live in unplanned, often illegal, shanty-towns with limited
access to basic needs and with environmental conditions that threaten health.
For a great number of individuals urbanization is perceived as "good" or at
least "less bad". There must be valid reasons why hundreds and millions
of people voluntarily move to the urban areas and stay there in spite of all
difficulties. In such cases, urbanisation may be taking place due to push
factors like environmental overload and degradation, resource scarcity and
conflict in the rural areas rather than pull factors of development in the
cities.
Usually, large urban agglomerations do not necessarily experience fast
population growth. In fact, some of the fastest growing cities have small
populations and, as population size increases, the growth rate of a citys
population tends to decline. The trend towards concentration of population
in larger urban settlements or big cities does not result in a marked decline
of either the proportion or the number of persons living in smaller urban
settlements. Growth rates may vary over time or between countries but
urbanization is likely to continue until a large majority of the population live
in urban areas.
The urban growth rate of less developed regions reached 3.0 per cent
per year in 1995- 2000 compared to a much lesser figure of 0.5 per cent in
more developed regions. This growth rate will continue to be particularly
rapid in the urban areas of less developed regions. In contrast, the world
rural population is expected to remain nearly stable. Even within the less
developed regions category there are marked differences in the level and pace
of urbanization. Regionally, Latin America and the Caribbean as a whole
are highly urbanized. Africa and Asia are considerably less urbanized and,
consequently, are expected to experience rapid rates of urbanization from the
20
Figure 3: Worlds Urban Population Growth
21
year 2000 onwards. With 80 percent of the population being urban, Europe
is the most urbanized continent (See Table below).
Figure 4: Selected Indicators for the Urban and Rural Population by Major
Area, 1950-2030.
22
population living in urban areas do not balance with the distribution of total
labor force between agricultural and non-agricultural occupations it may lead
to over-urbanization.
23
incentives and opportunities. If location incentives are distorted, so is growth
(Fay and Opal, 2000). As shown in the table, while East Asia and Africa
have had similar rates of urbanization (4-5% per annum) for the period 1970-
95, GDP growth in East Asia accelerated by about 3.7% per annum while
GDP declined by 0.66% per annum in sub-Saharan Africa. This implies that
urbanization occurred without generating the required resources (public or
private) and employment opportunities to accommodate the surge in urban
population. Although it was rapid, Africas urbanization process appeared to
follow a "normal" urbanization path until the mid-1970s. After about 1974,
Africa diverged significantly from the world trend as it continued to urbanize
more rapidly than other regions, even as its economy was collapsing, or at
least stagnating.
The notion that migrants return to rural areas when growth slows down
does not hold - at least not in any systematic manner. Urbanization does
not even noticeably slow down during economic downturns, implying that
people continue to flock to cities even when economic growth is low. The
prime determinant of whether urbanization increases rapidly or not is not
related to whether income growth is positive or negative. The implication
appears to be that Africa differs from the rest of the world more because of
its poor growth performance than because of its urbanization process. With
the given conditions, Africa is at a state of over-urbanization.
24
3.4 Mega-cities of the World
As with other urban terms, the term mega-city also lacks a clear-cut, stand-
ard definition. The United Nations identifies a Mega-city as an urban agglom-
eration with a population that exceeds 8 million (United Nations Population
Division, 2002) while other literatures use a figure of 10 million people. In
the 1950s New York was the only city with a population of more than 10
million people. Two decades later, in the 1970s it was joined by others as
the number increased to five. This number is expected to increase further to
23 cities in 2015 (see attached table). Some researches, however, state that
the number of mega cities has already reached 23 in the year 2000 and will
increase to 36 cities by the year 2015 (S. Jones, 1997).
It is evident that most mega cities are in Asia. Bangkok, Beijing, Cal-
cutta, Jakarta, Manila, Seoul, and Tokyo are just a few of the 20 or so mega
cities in the Asian side of the globe. These cities are at the centre of the
regions economic growth and are developing rapidly, not only in terms of
population but also in terms of economic and industrial importance. The eco-
nomic growth of these mega-cities has been boosted by national and regional
location factors favouring large cities and complementing their comparative
advantages in globalisation. Being engines of economic growth, mega cities
perform a commanding influence over satellites or smaller cities. However,
the bigger a city is the bigger its problems. Traffic, pollution and congestion
are only a few of the problems to mention some. Efforts to reduce rural to
urban migration to ease population pressure at the centres have not been
successful resulting in an increasing concentration of urban growth in all
large cities. Asia accounted for 62 percent of world population increase in
the period 1980-1990. If the 20th century was the century of urban sprawl,
the 21st century will be the century of mega-cities.
25
Table 1: Emergence, History and Expectation of Mega Cities around the
World (in millions). Source: UN Habitat 2000.
4.1 Beijing
4.1.1 Overview of Urbanization and Sprawl in the Chinese Con-
text
With a population close to 1.3 billion, China is the most populous country in
the world ( China Daily, July 2004 est.). China is still at a low urbanization
level. The World Bank reported that 30 percent of the Chinese population
was urban in 1995. From 1990 to 1995, the growth rates of medium size
and mega-cities have increased faster than smaller cities. During this time,
while urban population in cities increased by 21.6 percent, the urbanized area
increased by 90.4 percent. This means that the growth rate of urbanized land
was much faster than that of urban population, as summarized in the table
below.
27
set up a large number of development zones that are often large and dis-
continuous from cities. The second type of urban expansion is the increase
in the number of urban population, especially migrant workers and tempor-
ary urban residents (also called floating population) such as students, and
accompanying illegal construction into rural villages on the urban fringe.
In these villages, population growth is not accommodated by new develop-
ment but rather by crowding of existing peasant houses and illegal construc-
tion. The term semi-urbanized villages or semi-urbanization is used to
emphasize the fact that they are not fully urbanized in terms of physical
environment and urban services even though most residents are engaged in
non-agricultural activities and live an urban life style. Urban sprawl in the
Chinese context is thus the disproportionate expansion of urbanized area.
In addition, most studies on Chinese cities use the term urban sprawl to
describe discontinuous or leapfrog development pattern at micro level. Ting-
wei Zhang for example identifies three main factors contributing to sprawl
in China. These are the land market, local governments willingness to lease
land as the result of new tax revenue regulations and the decentralization pro-
cess after Chinas economic reforms. If urban sprawl is inefficient excess to
the natural expansion of cities in the Developed world, Chinese style sprawl
is unintended consequence of political manipulation of land development on
the urban fringe (Deng and Huang, 2003). In the case of development zones,
the intention of local governments might be to respond to their land market
demand. In the semi-urbanized villages, their intention might be to control
development, but urban population still sprawls out. Loss of thousands of
kilometres of land to sprawl puts China in a difficult position to feed its huge
population. The immediate action needed is not only to control excessive
urban built-up area but also control land-use change from agricultural and
forest to any other.
28
ulation and administrative border expansion increased the citys population
figure in huge numbers. According to Gu and Shen (2002), the change of
urban function from traditional, manufacturing base to center of service and
the change in 1978 which marked Beijing as a major manufacturing base
contributed in making the capital a socially polarized centre. These changes
in the economic structure provide plenty of opportunities for both high and
low-income jobs resulting in movement of people from rural to urban sectors.
The process of labour migration in Beijing follows two stages (Gu and
Shen, 2000). The first stage was the migration of urban residents (1949-
1984). In this period, rural to urban migration was under the strict control
of the government. With the absence of labour market, people were allocated
to specific areas according to the needs of the state economic plan (Kesteloot,
1992). In this period, the number of people moving into Beijing was very
small due to policies that favoured industrialization with limited urbaniza-
tion. Rules were tight and there was hardly any voluntary migration.
The second stage is the migration of rural peasants (1985-percent) as a
result of three interrelated factors;
Overall economic growth and the new wave of urban construction that
generated a big demand for labour, especially in the construction sector.
The inefficient state owned enterprises in Beijing which left a huge mar-
ket for more competitive small private businesses which have thrived
in the 1990s.
The tight migration that has been relaxed since the early 1980s.
Farmers dominate the new wave of rural to urban migration to the capital.
By 1998, the number of urban floating population accounted for about 30
percent of the total population of Beijing. 12
29
Figure 6: Rapid Urban Expansion of Beijing through the years 1949-1994
Before 1949, only the central part of Beijing was covered by urban devel-
opment in an intact way (refer figure). Between 1949 and 1980, the urban
area expanded further, mainly towards the north. The expansion during this
period was both as concentric and detached development.Cores of develop-
ment can be seen scattered away from the old center. In the period from 1980
to 1994, Beijing expanded even further out pushing the city limit. During
this time, new developments dominate the northeastern part of the city and
there was almost no significant growth in the south.This period was also the
fastest expansion period for Beijings urbanization (Qi Lu, 1999)
30
Table 3: Increase in Beijing Urban Built-up Area 1949-1996
31
2: Semi-urbanized villages
As stated, most residents in semi-urbanized villages are migrants from the
rural areas or people who need temporary residence such as students. These
villages are neither urban nor rural. The villages appear to be distributed
more evenly on all sides of the city.
These are the two forms of urban sprawl that arise in China and spe-
cifically in Beijing. What makes the Chinese sprawl different from the rest
of the world is the disproportionate conversion of farmland or arable land
to urban uses. In addition, central city decline resulting from negative im-
pacts of urban sprawl is not a Chinese phenomenon. Central cities are still
booming in China, although statistics show that since 1982 they have been
slowly losing their population due to the high price of housing (Zhou and
Meng, 1998) While richer people in general prefer to live in suburban areas
in developed world especially in the US, it is the poorer that have to move
to fringe areas in Chinese cities. This is one of the unique features of Chinese
version of urban sprawl.
32
and unemployment are problems that still need to be regarded.
33
system and planning and regional imbalance. Action is therefore needed
to provide for immediate needs of the population while trying for solutions
to overcome mismanagement of land and further horizontal expansion with
minimum financial expenditure.
34
1993). In spite of better job creation strategies and increasing manufactur-
ing sectors and industries, there is still huge number of unemployed in the
capital. Generally, the city faces unbalanced (uneven) growth and a series of
challenges related to housing, water and sewerage, mobility, unemployment,
service provision and limited integration with the rest of the regions in the
country.
35
Table 4: Major Land Cover Change for Addis Ababa and Surrounding Area
(1ha = 104 m2 )
Source: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
ing, with its limited capacity, to address the problem of this specific group
and focus mainly on the low-cost housing construction. With its low budget
and lack of finance, the agency is barely able to provide adequate houses
and services to the inhabitants and to the extension areas, thus discouraging
housing construction and contributing to the expansion of slums. The mid
and high-rise apartment structures are expensive to build and unaffordable.
They can only house a very small percentage of high-income city dwellers.
Some high-rise buildings still suffer from empty top floors. Where the gov-
ernment fail to provide housing, squatter settlements erected by migrants
and the citys poorest residents give solutions for shelter needs. Efforts to
clear out slum areas in some parts of the city were met with opposition from
different groups of people and residents. Most recently, differentiated own-
ership options such as condominium and housings for rent are introduced
by the city administration. 10, 000 houses are being built in the citys ten
districts to combat the immediate housing problem (Ethiopian Reporter). It
is also reported that the Addis Ababa Housing Development intends to build
150,000 - 200,000 houses by the end of its five-year project plan. Compared
with the increase in the citys population these could only carve small part
of the problem. In spite of this, future growth in Addis Ababa unfortunately
will be horizontal and not vertical.
36
new towns. Instead, it can only try to supply each new settlement on the
urban fringe with access to basic services. So far, the city administration has
been preparing a strategic plan with the following vision15 :
Addis Ababa will be a clean, green, safe and livable city, a vibrant com-
mercial and industrial centre and the nations administrative and Africas
diplomatic capital with improved access to municipal services, good governance,
encouraged entrepreneurship and social harmony.
There is also a plan to organize a polycentric hierarchical system of centres
taking into account the trend in growth direction (east, southwest, and south)
and locate these centres in strategic areas. Also in the agenda is the pro-
vision of adequate residential options for all income level and upgrade or
improve the working, living environment and economic activity of key slum
areas. The ring road network and its maximum utilization for cross country
freight trucks is expected to bring about an ease in the city centres traffic
while enhancing regional accessibility. In order to limit excessive horizontal
expansion, vertical construction and densification would have been a good
solution. But the lease system and land price make high-rise building system
expensive. Even though condominium law came into being in the regulation,
there is weakness in promoting and exercising it both by public and govern-
ment bodies. The economic situation of the residents of Addis Ababa is also
incapable of utilizing high-rise building either on rental basis or on building
their own apartment anyway. Financial institutions could not gear this gap.
4.3 Stockholm
4.3.1 Overview of Urbanization and Sprawl in the Swedish Con-
text
Sweden is a highly urbanized country with its growth following a long-term
historical trend that is accompanied by high productivity and great diversity.
In the beginning of the 19th century, not more then 10 percent of the Swedish
population lived in towns and Sweden was one of the least urbanized countries
in Europe (Nilsson, L 1989). The ratio began to rise during the 1830s and
1840s. Recently, the total population has reached 8.9 million and the degree
of urbanization is above 80 percent (UN Habitat) .
Most agree that migration played a major role in Swedens urban growth
process leaving much of the countryside depopulated. When migration de-
15
(Commision 5, Istanbul workshop)
37
Table 5: Swedens Growth of Urban and Total Population 1990-2010
Source : UN Habitat
creased and was replaced by natural increase, the intensity in urban growth
fell (Arnstberg and Bergstrm, 2001). New developments are usually planned
within existing urban areas taking social, physical or environmental impacts
into consideration. The country is well-known for its conservation of green
parks and public transport culture. If sprawl is defined as detached develop-
ment from a developed core, then scholars such as Gunnar Isberg argue that
there is no apparent leapfrog development or urban sprawl in Sweden. On his
article entitled Reflections on the Swedish Planning Approach, (1998), Isberg
argued that there is a distinct and noticeable line between where urban de-
velopment ends and rural area begins. Another important observation is that
geographical expansion has almost ceased since the period of growth during
the 1970s. Since then, the spatial growth of the built-up areas of Sweden
- at all levels - has stagnated and only minor expansion has occurred from
the spreading out of low density individually owned houses. It is becom-
ing increasingly common to use summer cottages for longer periods during
more of the year, while some are being converted into permanent residences
(Arnstberg and Bergstrm, 2001).
38
external migration flows that respond to changes in labour market conditions
explain the rapid increase of the citys population (especially the last 10-15
years). Figures show that while the economy was in its downturn in the be-
ginning of the 90s a lot of migrants and inhabitants were unemployed. The
economy picked up gradually and is now stabilizing. The population group
with higher education also tends to migrate to big cities such as Stockholm
where there are more opportunities. The city is unique in a way that it is
built to adapt to changes and find effective ways to manage urban ecosystem
services. It is also characterized by having a large proportion of its people
travelling by public transport. Almost 95% of the inhabitants of the city live
in dense settlements located at transport nodes.
39
Table 6: Land use, Stockholm Region 2003.
40
big housing estates and multi-family blocks in large residential areas out-
side the existing urban centres during a ten year period. These were highly
criticized because of accessibility and social polarization problems. The ever-
increasing population in the Stockholm Region has still not been balanced
by housing construction at nearly the same pace and there is great lack of af-
fordable accommodation everywhere in the region. Sweden is well known for
its highest number of household per individual. Single, sambo, divorced and
living alone, married and childless, old and single...all fall into this category
of people who need small individual flats or apartments. In addition, prices
are soaring as the competition increases for areas nearer to central areas that
are close to workplaces. Although the region has internationally well known
higher education institutions, students cannot benefit from them because of
the lack of student accommodations. There were instances where vacant
office blocks were changed to residential apartments. Present construction
level of dwellings is the lowest for over fifty years at a time where population
growth is at its highest. Stockholm Regional Plan (RUFS 2001) program
and proposal puts present and future demand for housing in figures. It states
that depending on how rapidly the population increases, between 9,000 and
12,000 units will need to be built annually until the year 2015. During the
1990s almost 1,000 vacation cottages per year were converted to year-round
residences. While decreasing the demand for housing with a fraction, this
in some way has led to sprawling of the city and inefficient use of land. In
general, it is difficult to say Stockholm has a process of common land-use
sprawl.
41
land and re-use former neglected sites. Former industrial sites become mixed
residential-commercial neighbourhoods connected by tramways. Located on
former industrial-use Brownfield site and initially intended as a location for
the 2004 Summer Olympics, Hammarby Sjstad18 that is being developed as
one of Stockholms largest urban development projects, is a good, success-
ful example. Designed for 20,000 inhabitants with mixed use environment,
renewable energy sources, recycling and treatment plants, sufficient public
transport means and recreational areas, it is the most environmental friendly
urban development. This development is a good proof that urban growth is
possible through alteration of land-uses with high citizen participation.
Stockholms City Plan also contains enhancing the characteristic city-
scape and saving the existing green structure as its main target. Poly-
centricity is one of the development schemes both within Stockholm and
surrounding regions. Although figures are unavailable there is a condition
that smaller communities surrounding Stockholm region can accommodate
increased densities. With the provision of fast trains connecting these com-
munities with the centre, people can have better choices of living in the
outskirts while commuting to the city to work. By making the public trans-
portation efficient, private use of car can be discouraged and pollution and
time spent to commute minimized.
Regional Planning and Urban Transportation (RTK) which is respons-
ible for regional planning, overall traffic planning and regional development
issues for the region is dealing with such a situation where it can promote
growth while sustaining the citys attractivity. Ecologically, the Stockholm
regional plan is based on Agenda 21 (considering ecological effects and needs)
and meant to be a strategic instrument to combine continual growth with
long-term sustainable development. The regions success in growing with a
sustainable manner is a good example for the rest of the world cities.
42
other. It is hardly possible to tell where one neighborhood ends and the
other begin. In few instances, the growth has been so great and the size of
core cities so large that major urban areas have merged and formed clusters
of cities.
History of US urbanization began in early 1800s when industrial cities
begin to appear and grow rapidly in the Northeast, near waterways. As
railway, fuel and other technologies began to take hold, industrial cities be-
came increasingly concentrated and congested that it was causing huge health
problems resulting in more deaths than births in some cities. And hence,
gradually cities begin to decentralize and both urbanization and population
growth slowed down. Since the 1970s central cities, while generally upgrad-
ing or improving, remain home to the nations very poor. Recently many
central cities are reviving both in terms of population growth and invest-
ment.
Source: Demographia
43
that causes sprawl. In such cases, leapfrogging, less dense and corridor de-
velopments along transport lines (as in the case of New York) are dominant
patters of sprawl. Even though population figures are still increasing, there
is opposition and struggle to stop further outward growth and contain over-
urbanisation.
44
cores. By contrast, Los Angeles grew rapidly as developers purchased and
build housing developments in tracts of land throughout the county (Fo-
gelson, 1993). Los Angeles is also described as the prototypical example
of a multi-centric city. The city is generally shaped by eighteenth-century
European colonization, nineteenth-century U.S. territorial expansion, and
twentieth-century migration. The city houses some of the worlds tallest
buildings. But high degree of automobile ownership has resulted in some
areas developing somewhat less densely.
Source: Demographia
45
Figure 8: Los Angeles Region: Change in Urbanized Area, 1970-1990.
46
4.4.4 The Need for Housing and Urban Sprawl
With its beautiful, mild climate and natural scenery, Los Angeles millions
of tourists and opportunity seeking immigrants are in constant need for ac-
commodation although housing prices are high.
Source: Demographia
Real estate builders and investors in Los Angeles cannot seem to build new
homes fast enough even though housing prices are high. Around 1970, unlike
most American Urbanized Areas, Los Angeles stopped further spreading out.
That is, the land consumption per resident did not increase. In fact, the
urban land per resident shrank by 8 percent. In a way the city was growing
in a controlled way and density increased in both the core city and in the
suburbs. Furthermore, by 1990, land consumption per Los Angeles resident
dropped even more. That made Los Angeles the most densely populated
Urbanized Area in America. No other urban area provided so little land per
resident (0.11 acre/resident, www.sprawlcity.org). And hence the city was a
model for others although there were indicators that the increased density
had resulted in several major social frustrations, overcrowded schools, crime
and congestion. Results also show that increasing the density in Los Angeles
did not stop sprawl. Between 1970 and 1990, Los Angeles sprawled across
an extra 394 square miles (252,160 acres). This was in addition to the 1,572
square miles it already occupied in 1970.
47
triggering an intense debate about growth around other states and the coun-
try. Elected officials from cities, inner suburbs and people in all category and
walks of life are all realizing that uncoordinated suburban expansion brings
needless costs. Growth agendas are now revolving around changing the state
rules of development to slow decentralization, promote urban reinvestment
and promote a new form of development that is mixed-use, transit-oriented
and pedestrian friendly.
According to the American Planning Association, new planning bills are
introduced and approved. More governors are issuing orders on planning,
smart growth and related topics. The 1973 enacted Land Conservation and
Development Act to contain urban sprawl and preserve forests and farmland
is being practiced in more states than before. The Act required that urban
growth boundaries be drawn around all cities throughout the state. It also
requires that all city, county, and metropolitan plans be consistent with state
planning goals and authorizes the State Land Conservation and Development
Commission to enforce compliance with the consistency requirement. Applic-
ation of Smart Growth principles in some states brought about rewarding
achievements and hence the support for Smart Growth reforms has increased
markedly among governors and state legislatures (Katz, 2002) . Los Angeles
is well known for implementing the idea of Smart Growth development policy.
Lower Infrastructure Spending, better Land Use Reforms/Land Acquisition
and, Growth Management are some of Smart Growth agenda being used.
Other attractive, more compact forms of urban and suburban living are still
being demonstrated.
48
5 Analysis and Discussion
Features of a particular country or community substantially affect the degree
of any costs or effects of sprawl. The case cities presented here can only
provide one with a glimpse of how different causes and effects lead to land-
use phenomena and hence to sprawling. They are not to be interpreted as
recommending one type of development over another. Rather they are to
serve as comparables for discussion and better understanding of the concept.
A rich and detailed data with a careful yearly physical analysis of landform
is needed in order to come up with generalized possible patterns or trends.
Sprawl is more than an extended urban area and the failure to quantify the
term will always leave one with a certain gap.
5.2 Causes
Different situations are observed to cause sprawl. In almost all cases, rise in
population plays a major role as a main cause. In some of the cities (Addis
Ababa and Beijing) natural births are the leading factors to a population
boom other than rural-urban and international migration. Fulfilling the re-
source requirements of a growing population requires some form of land-use
change Low density development, subsidization of infrastructure investment
such as roads (specially in Los Angeles), poor land policies (Addis Ababa,
Beijing) and generally inefficient land consumption can all cause sprawl from
land-use point of view. The question lies on how land is altered.
49
5.3 Effects
Sprawl in all form has its costs. In China, where the population is highest,
land for food production is becoming scarce. In cities like Addis Ababa un-
limited horizontal expansion is destroying ecology and having a pronounced
effect on climate change. For Los Angeles which boasts of having the densest
settlement, the density by itself is causing congestion and social problems.
Low-density, leapfrogging developments cause high expenditure for infra-
structure and service provision (some parts of Beijing and Los Angeles).
5.4 Policies
American policies that encourage use of private car lead to sprawling of cit-
ies. Other poor policies observed are building height limit (Addis Ababa)
and new development zoning (Beijing). The Swedish planning strategy is
by far the best in containing growth. But land for re-use may not always
be available. In such cases, planning policies should give priority to envir-
onmental protection and sustainability of cities. The Smart Growth ideas
incorporate useful growth and planning policies.
5.5 Comparison
For developing countries like China and Ethiopia high birthrates contrib-
ute to population pressure in addition to rural-urban migration. The flow
of peasants from the countryside to cities is a headache for planners. In
both countries, even though strict government rules were applied to regu-
late migration, people still tend to move to cities that provided them with
work and better opportunities. In central parts of these cities, infrastruc-
ture and services are over-utilized, roads are narrow and congested, slums
and illegal construction expanded. Where government failed to provide for
housing needs in developing countries, slums and illegal settlements serve as
a solution.
In almost all cases population pressure is observed to be the main cause
of urban sprawl. Where land-use decisions are vital, in economically poor
Ethiopia horizontal expansions are the only means of growth that dominate.
High-rise developments are still in their early stages. In developed countries,
by increasing density and using land effectively they can easily accommodate
growth. Los Angeles and Beijings skylines are marked by high-rise construc-
50
tion and not so much green space is available for recreation. Addis Ababa
is flat and horizontally stretched while Stockholm is mixed with medium
rise apartments and green wedges and parks in between neighborhoods. The
Chinese urban sprawl is different by its disproportionate conversion of farm or
arable land to urban uses. In addition, central city decline resulting from neg-
ative impacts of urban life as in the case of US is not a Chinese phenomenon.
Private ownership and usage of cars is a typical sprawl phenomenon in US.
Beijing is also facing congestion problems due to many cars in its street.
In contrast, Stockholm has its large proportion of population using public
transport. Los Angeles is a city that should address the issue of low-density
development at the city periphery. While cities in developed countries are
planned with effective transportation routes, those in developing countries
develop in an unplanned and haphazard way. Expansions follow existing
transport corridors in some cases while in others they just pop up detached
from existing urbanized areas. While richer people in general prefer to live
in suburban areas in developed world, it is the poorer that have to move
to fringe areas in developing countries like China and Ethiopia. This is one
of the most important differences between developed and developing country
versions of sprawl.
51
change in which the rate at which land is converted for development exceeds
the population growth rate over a specified time period. As a pattern of
land-use in an urbanized area, sprawl or sprawling exhibits low levels of some
combination of eight distinct dimensions: density, continuity, concentration,
compactness, centrality, nuclearity, diversity, and proximity.
The social and economic consequences of sprawl include both positive
and negative effects. The impact sprawl has upon environmental and nat-
ural resources, however, is predominantly harmful. Sprawl is increasingly
becoming an issue that is associated with urbanization no matter where it
takes place. Not many studies are done regarding sprawl in developing coun-
tries. Therefore, it is difficult to cross-relate available findings in globalized
manner. But in general, developing countries are in a stage where their fer-
tility rate is still higher while mortality rates are declining. In contrast, the
developed world, especially Europe is faced with increase in old age pop-
ulation. The world population as a whole is growing in an alarming rate
and taking a lot of space in doing so. The common causal factors that are
considered responsible for urban sprawling are population and growth per
capita land consumption (increase in the amount of urban land a resident
uses). As the degree and form of urban sprawl are different for different
countries, so are indicators. In developing countries where the percentage of
unemployed especially in rural areas is high, people flock in great numbers
in search of job and better living conditions. This leads to crowding of cities
well beyond city limits since there is no space for them to live. Central cores
become ideal places for slums, congestion and crime. In developed countries
where incomes are much higher, people prefer to live away from centers in the
quieter much greener outskirts of cities. Their income also makes it possible
for them to own private cars and live in bigger accommodation units. In
low-density areas, the car dominates the choice of transport. While the poor
are forced to live in the rich prefer to move out of city centers. This is
regarded as the main difference between sprawl in developing and developed
countries context. Excessive land consumption, low densities in comparison
to old city cores, fragmented open space, wide gaps between developments,
scattered appearance and lack of public space typically characterize sprawl.
Use of mass transit system, densifying settlement and efficient use of
land or growing smartly are some general solutions to tackle the problem
of sprawl. Solutions should have to be modified for the context in which
they are to be applied. Provision of employment and economic growth, for
instance, can help curb the problem of sprawl and even work more effectively
52
in developing countries. The case cities presented in this paper only give
a glimpse of how one countrys cause, effect and urban planning policy dif-
fers from the other. Without understanding the broader issues that are the
underlying problems, it is difficult to provide for long term solutions to the
issue of sprawl. Therefore it is difficult to cross-relate available findings and
make generalized conclusions. Most countries are moving along an unsus-
tainable consumption path. While developing, the rural to urban land ratio
is decreasing leaving less and less land for food production. The problem of
urban sprawl is, therefore, an observable fact that needs action, now.
53
References
Anna Kajumulo Tibaijuka, 2003. The political Economy of Sprawl in the
Developing World, Multinational monitor, Volume 24, No.10.
The Future of the American Metropolis?, Discussion Paperan Metropolis?,
Discussion Paper.
URL: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/casepaper58.pdf (Browsed Dec 2004).
The Future of the American Metropolis?, Discussion Paperan Metropolis?,
Discussion Paper.
URL: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/casepaper58.pdf (Browsed Dec 2004).
Claudio Acioly Jr. and Forbes Davidson, 1996. Density in Urban Develop-
ment, Building Issues Habitat ii Journal, 1996, Volume 8.
David doa Ries, 2002. How Smart Was That Growth? Student paper avail-
able at:
URL: http://www.asu.edu/caed/proceedings02/S-DOSREI/s-dosrei.htm
David E.Bloom and Jeffry E.Sachs, 1998. Geography, Demography and Eco-
nomic Growth in Africa, Brookings article, 207-273.
David Riggs, Randal OToole and Wendell Cox, Urban Sprawl, 2001.The
Environmental Resource, 187-200.
URL: http://www.cei.org/pdf/2347.pdf
Edward L. Glaeser and Matthew E. Kahn, 2003. Sprawl and Urban Growth,
Harvard Institute of Economic Research discussion paper.
URL: http://post.economics.harvard.edu/hier/2003papers/HIER2004.pdf
Eknath V. Marathe, 2001, Modern City & The Problem of Urban of Sprawl,
DPD 38-2001, Browsed Dec 2005.
URL: www.regional.niagara.on.ca
Frank Ellis and Nigel Harris, 2004. New Thinking About Urban and Rural
Development, paper presented for Department for International Develop-
ment, browsed Dec 2004
URL: http://www.livelihoods.org/hot_topics/docs/UR_Ellis&Harris.doc
George Galster, Royce Hanson, Michael R.Ratcliffe, Harold Wolman, Stephen
Coleman and Jason Freihage, 2001. Wrestling Sprawl to the ground: Defin-
ing and measuring an Elusive concept, Housing Policy Debate, volume 12,
issue 4, 681- 717
54
John F. Long, David R. Rain, and Michael R. Ratcliffe, 2001. Population
Density vs. Urban Population: Comparative GIS Studies in China, India,
and the United States, Population Division, US. Census Bureau
Marianne Fay and Charlotte Opal, 1999. Urbanization without Growth:
A Not-So-Uncommon Phenomenon, World Bank Policy Research Working
Paper No. 2412
Natural Evolution, Flight from Blight, and the Fiscalization of Land Use,
Sacramento, CA: California Senate Office of Research.
URL: http://www.csus.edu/indiv/w/wassmerr/WassmerEdwardsCausesSprawl.
pdf
Neha Menon, 2004. Urban Sprawl: A developing country approach, e-journal
of The World Student Community for Sustainable Development, browsed
Nov 2004
URL: http://www.wscsd.org/ejournal/article.php3id_article=113
Richard A. Easterlin, 1994. Twentieth Century American Population Growth,
The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Vol.III
Robert W. Wassmer, 2004. Causes of Urban Sprawl in the United States,
browsed Nov 2004
URL: http://www1.pacific.edu/cop/economics/colloquium/wassmer.doc
The Prospectus for World Urbanization and Rural Growth, 2001. United
Nations Population Division World Urbanization Prospects: The 2001 Revi-
sion, 13-34.
URL: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wup2001/WUP2001_
CH2.pdf
55
UNFPA, State of World Population 1999.
URL: http://www.unfpa.org/swp/1999/chapter2d.htm
CHINA
Beijing International Homepage.
URL:http://www.ebeijing.gov.cn/default.htm
Beijing to keep population within 18 million by 2020, an article on China
Daily (2004-11-08)
URL:http://english.sina.com/china/1/2004/1108/9659.html
Chaolin Gu, Jianafa Shen, 2003. Transformation of urban socio-spatial struc-
ture in socialist Market economies: the case of Beijing, Habitat International
27, 107-122
F. Frederic Deng, Youqin Huang, 2003. Uneven land reform and urban sprawl
in China: the case of Beijing, Progress in Planning 61, 211-236
Qi LU, 1999. Historical Perspectives of Land-use and Land-cover Changes
in Beijing, 1999 NIES Workshop paper
Tingwei Zhang-GR, 2001. Land market forces and government?s role in
sprawl: The case of China, Cities, Volume 17, No. 2, 123-135
Yingxin Zhu, Borrong Lin, 2003. Sustainable Housing and Urban Construc-
tion in China. Energy and Buildings 36, 1287- 1297
ETHIOPIA
10,000 Houses are being Built in Addis Ababa, newspaper article reported
by Getachew Nigatu, Ethiopian reporter, posted online 2004-12-05
URL:http://www.ethiopianreporter.com/displayamharic.php?id=2266
Addis Ababa City Government Home Page.
URL: http://www.macalester.edu/courses/geog61/kshively/
Agriculture in Addis Ababa, browsed Oct 2004
URL: http://www.macalester.edu/courses/geog61/kshively/agri.html
Axumite G. Egziabher, 1993. Urban Farming, Cooperatives, and the Urban
Poor in Addis Ababa, Cities feeding people, Chapter 5. Browsed Oct 2004.
URL: http://web.idrc.ca/es/ev-42937-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html
Baymot Tsegaye, Nov 2004. The Role of High-rise building systems in the
prevention of Addis Ababas Horizontal Expansion, MSc paper
56
City Floats Auction for Over 42 Million Birr Worth Plots of Land, newspaper
article reported by Melaku Demissie, Ethiopian Reporter (2004-04-07)
URL: http://www.ethiopianreporter.com/displayenglish.php?id=812
City Government Vows to Activate Land Lease Implementation, newspaper
article reported by Melaku Demissie, Ethiopian Reporter(2004-09-15)
URL: www.ethiopianreporter.com/displayenglish.php?id=1368
City to Distribute Plots of Land for Building 40,000 Houses, newspaper art-
icle reported by Fitsum W/Giorgis, Ethiopian reporter, 2004-09-13
URL: http://www.ethiopianreporter.com/displayenglish.php?id=1824
Ethiopias Population Boom, Cities, Newsfile posted 2003-03-31.
URL: www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=1916
Housing Conditions and Strategies for Growth Management, browsed Oct
2004.
URL: www.macalester.edu/courses/geog61/kshively/housing.html
Istanbul workshop, Commission 5: Metropolitan Performance Measurement,
2003. Browsed Oct 2004
URL: http://www.metropolis.org/Data/Files/109_Minutes_-_Istanbul_workshop_
29-30_Sept.doc
Rafiq M, Hailemariam A., 1987. Some structural aspects of urbanization in
Ethiopia. Genus 183-204.
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_
uids=12143695&dopt=Citation
Postwar Urbanization of Addis Ababa, browsed Oct 2004.
URL: http://www.macalester.edu/courses/geog61/kshively/urban.html
W. Tadesse, T. D. Tsegaye, and T. L. Coleman, 2004. Land Use/Cover
Change Detection of the City of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia using GIS, 2001.
Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Volume 1, 462-464.
SWEDEN
Alexander Sthle, 2002. Urban Planning for a Quality Dense Green Struc-
ture, browsed Jan 2005.
URL: http://www.map21ltd.com/COSTC11/sociotop.htm
Karl-Olov Arnstberg & Inger Bergstrm. URBS PANDENS.
URL: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/urbs/stockh.htm
57
Mats Pemer, 2001. Developing a sustainable compact city in Stockholm,
Sweden, UN Habitat, Istanbul 5.
URL: http://www.unhabitat.org/istanbul+5/7-Sweden.PDF
Munich - Stockholm Comparison of the two regions? Planning systems and
contents, Regional Planning Association Munich & Regional Planning and
Urban Transportation Stockholm County Council, 2003, RTK Publication,
Promemoria No.3
Regional Studies, December 1, 2001. Journal of The Regional Studies Asso-
ciation, Carfax Publishing, Issue: Volume 35, Number 9.
Regional Development Plan 2001 for the Stockholm Region, RUFS 2001,
RTK publication.
Susanne Kratochwil, "European Images around Sprawl(ing)", Research pa-
per browsed Jan 2005.
URL: http://www.uic.edu/cuppa/cityfutures/papers/webpapers/cityfuturespapers/
session4_4/4_4europeanimages.pdf
USA
1998 Sierra Club Sprawl Report: 30 Most Sprawl-Threatened Cities.
URL: www.sierraclub.org/sprawl/report98/angeles.asp
Lauren M. Scott, William J. Lloyd, Employment Patterns in Greater Los
Angeles between 1980-1990. Browsed Feb 2005.
URL: http://www.spatial.maine.edu/ucgis/testproc/scott_l/scott.html
Los Angeles
URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles\%2C_California
Los Angeles Growth Map. (Jan 2005).
URL: http://www.metroresearch.org/maps/national_report/LA_ua.pdf
Narayan Sastry, Anne R. Pebley, Michela Zonta, 2004. Neighbourhood Defin-
itions and the Spatial Dimension of Daily Life in Los Angeles, research paper
browsed on Feb 2005
URL: http://web.mit.edu/cis/www/migration/seminars/montgomery_wp.pdf
Peter Gordon and Harry W. Richardson, 1997. Why Sprawl Is Good, re-
search article browsed Dec 2004.
URL: http://www.cascadepolicy.org/growth/gordon.htm
58
Portland: Far Less Dense than Los Angeles, Sprawling Like Phoenix. Browsed
Jan 2005.
URL: http://www.demographia.com/db-porla.htm
Russ Lopez, H. Patricia Hynes, 2003. Sprawl in the 1990s, Measurement,
Distribution, and Trends, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 38, No. 3, 325-355
Study Finds Population Growth at Heart of Urban Sprawl, 2001. Immigra-
tion report, browsed Dec 2004.
URL: http://www.fairus.org/Research/Research.cfm?ID=1849&c=54
59