You are on page 1of 4

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316189701

The validity of the Wong and Law Emotional


Intelligence Scale in a Chinese sample: Tests of
measurement invariance...

Article in Personality and Individual Differences October 2017


DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.025

CITATIONS READS

0 118

1 author:

Feng Kong
Shaanxi Normal University
43 PUBLICATIONS 553 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Cognitive and neural basis of emotional intelligence View project

Neural basis of happiness and well-being View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Feng Kong on 20 April 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxx-xxx

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Personality and Individual Differences

F
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com

OO
Short Communication

The validity of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in a Chinese sample:
Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and age
Feng Kong

PR
School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University,' China

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article history: The Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) is one of the most widely used measures of trait emotional
Received 5 March 2017

ED
intelligence. The aim of this study was to examine measurement equivalence and latent mean differences of the WLEIS
Received in revised form 7 April 2017 across gender and age groups. The sample consisted of 1160 Chinese individuals aged 1340 years. Confirmation factor
Accepted 12 April 2017
analysis (CFA) replicated the original four-factor model previously found in other studies. Importantly, the multi-group
Available online xxx
CFA revealed that configural, metric and scalar invariance across gender and age groups were supported. Moreover, la-
tent mean scores on the WLEIS subscales were comparable across gender and age groups. The implications of these
Keywords: findings are discussed in light of existing literature in the field.
Emotional intelligence 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Confirmatory factor analysis
CT
Measurement invariance
Gender differences
Age differences

1. Introduction Luebbers, Downey, & Stough, 2007; Whitman, Van Rooy,


Viswesvaran, & Kraus, 2009).
RE

In the past decades, emotional intelligence (EI) has attracted con- Although the WLEIS has been used widely in many countries, to
siderable attention from researchers (Saklofske, Austin, & Minski, our knowledge, few studies have investigated measurement invariance
2003; Wong & Law, 2002). In the literature, there are two classic of the WLEIS across groups (e.g., age and gender). Previous literature
models of EI: the ability (AEI) and the trait models (TEI). Ability EI has indicated that age is a significant predictor of TEI. For example,
refers to a cognitive ability concerning one's actual ability to per- Mayer, Caruso, and Salovey (1999) found that adults scored signifi-
ceive, use, understand, and manage emotions in the self and others cantly higher than adolescents. This pattern of results is also found in
(Kong, Zhao, & You, 2012). TEI refers to a constellation of emo- many other studies (Bar-On, 1997; Luebbers et al., 2007; Sliter, Chen,
R

tion-related self-perceptions located at the lower-levels of personality Withrow, & Sliter, 2013). However, it is important to note that, when
hierarchies (Kong et al., 2012; Petrides, Pita, & Kokkinaki, 2007). In examining these age differences, we must assure that the WLEIS does
this study, we focused on a trait approach and examined measurement measure the same latent structure across different age groups. Thus,
CO

invariance of a TEI scale across groups because replication of valida- one purpose of this study was to examine whether the measurement
tion studies is necessary and useful. structure underlying TEI is equivalent across age groups.
To assess individual differences in TEI, the 16-item Wong and In addition, previous literature has also shown that gender is a sig-
Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) was developed (Wong & nificant predictor of TEI. For example, males were found to score
Law, 2002). The WLEIS measures four dimensions of TEI: Self-Emo- higher on TEI than females (Kong & Zhao, 2013; Kong et al., 2012;
tion Appraisals, Others' Emotion Appraisals, Use of Emotion, and Mikolajczak, Luminet, Leroy, & Roy, 2007). Contrary to the above
Regulation of Emotion. Wong and Law (2002) have found that the results, some studies reported that females had higher TEI scores than
UN

WLEIS have satisfactory validity and reliability. Subsequently, the males (Saklofske et al., 2003; Van Rooy, Alonso, & Viswesvaran,
WLEIS has been validated in different countries (Fukuda et al., 2011; 2005) or reported no gender differences (Whitman et al., 2009). How-
Fukuda, Saklofske, Tamaoka, & Lim, 2012; LaPalme, Wang, Joseph, ever, when examining the gender differences, we must rule out the
Saklofske, & Yan, 2016; Li, Saklofske, Bowden, Yan, & Fung, 2012; possibility that the differences arise from measurement bias between
Libbrecht, Beuckelaer, Lievens, & Rockstuhl, 2014; males and females. To our knowledge, only one published study has
tested measurement invariance of the WLEIS across gender (Whitman
et al., 2009). However, this study was conducted in a working en-
vironment, with American job applicants as participants.
Email address: Corresponding author at: School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal
University, 199 South Changan Road, Xian, 710062, China.E-mail address:
kongfeng87@126.com or kongfeng@snnu.edu.cn (F. Kong)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.025
0191-8869/ 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2 Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxx-xxx

Thus, another purpose of this study was to examine gender-related in- 3. Results
variance of the WLEIS in a general Chinese population.
To address these issues, we first performed a confirmatory fac- 3.1. Confirmatory factor analysis
tor analysis (CFA) to test whether the original four-factor structure of
the WLEIS can be replicated in a large Chinese sample (N = 1160). To examine whether the original four-factor structure of the
Second, we conducted multi-group CFAs (MGCFAs) to test mea- WLEIS can be replicated in our dataset, we first performed a CFA.

F
surement invariance across gender and age groups. Finally, we con- The results indicated that the proposed four-factor model showed a
ducted MGCFAs to test gender- and age-related latent mean differ- very good fit to the data, 2 (98) = 386.74, p < 0.001, NNFI = 0.96,

OO
ences. We expected latent scores on the WLEIS subscales were com- CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.032. The factor loadings
parable across gender and age groups. ranged from 0.55 to 0.89, and were significant.

3.2. Measurement invariance across gender and age groups


2. Method
3.2.1. Configural invariance across gender and age groups
2.1. Participants and procedure The MGCFA started with testing for configural invariance assess-
ing whether the WLEIS was best described by a four-factor structure

PR
The survey was made available to participants via a survey website across gender and age groups. With regard to the gender groups, the
(http://www.sojump.com). Written informed consent was obtained results showed that the configural invariance model (M1) fitted the
from each participant prior to this study. A total of 1160 Chinese data very well, RMSEA = 0.039, CFI = 0.96 (Table 1), and all factor
healthy volunteers (mean age = 24.19 5.22 years, 636 females) an- loading were significant (p < 0.05).
swered these questionnaires. The majority of the participants had com- With regard to the age groups, the M1 fitted the data well, RM-
pleted university, college or post-graduate studies (70.6%). The study SEA = 0.034, CFI = 0.94, and all factor loading were significant
was approved by the local committee of ethics. (p < 0.05). Together, these results indicated that the four-factor model

ED
The sample was split into three age groups: the first group con- fitted the data well in two gender and three age groups.
sisted of 187 teenagers aged between 13 and 19 (M = 16.75,
SD = 1.96, 95 females). The second group consisted of 852 youths 3.2.2. Metric invariance across gender and age groups
(i.e., young adults) aged between 20 and 30 (M = 24.38, SD = 2.87, Subsequently, a metric invariance model (M2) was tested with fac-
472 females). The third group consisted of 121 adults aged between tor loading constrained to be equal across groups. With regard to the
31 and 40 (M = 34.35, SD = 2.93, 69 females). gender groups, the results showed a good model fit, RMSEA = 0.038,
CFI = 0.96. When compared to the M1, no significant changes oc-
CT
curred, CFI = 0.001 and RMSEA = 0.0006.
2.2. Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale
With regard to the age groups, the M2 fitted the data well, RM-
SEA = 0.033, CFI = 0.94. When compared to the M1, no significant
The 16-item WLEIS (Wong & Law, 2002) was used to assess TEI.
changes occurred, CFI = 0.001 and RMSEA = 0.001. This indi-
Sample items are as follows: I am quite capable of controlling my
cated that factor loadings were invariant across gender and age groups.
own emotions (Regulation of Emotion), I always know whether or
not I am happy (Self-Emotion Appraisals), I am sensitive to the
RE

3.2.3. Scalar invariance across gender and age groups


feelings and emotions of others (Others' Emotion Appraisals), and
To establish scalar invariance (M3), intercepts and factor loadings
I always tell myself I am a competent person (Use of Emotion).
were constrained to be equal across groups. With regard to the gen-
Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from
der groups, the results showed a good model fit, RMSEA = 0.041,
1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. In the current study, the al-
CFI = 0.95. When compared to M2, no significant changes occurred,
pha reliabilities of WLEIS subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.87.
CFI = 0.009 and RMSEA = 0.003. This indicated that intercepts
R

and factor loadings were invariant across the female and male groups.
2.3. Data analysis With regard to the age groups, the results showed a good model fit,
RMSEA = 0.033, CFI = 0.94. When compared to the M2, no signif-
To examine whether the original four-factor structure of the icant changes occurred, CFI = 0.001 and RMSEA = 0.0005. This
CO

WLEIS could be replicated in our dataset, a CFA was first performed indicated that intercepts and factor loadings were invariant across age
using Amos 22.0. Because Chi-Square is considered to be sensitive to groups.
sample size, we used the following indices to evaluate model fit (Hu Taking together, these results suggest that configural, metric and
& Bentler, 1999): non-normal fit index (NNFI), comparative fit index scalar invariance hold across gender and age groups.
(CFI), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and root mean
square error of approximation (RMSEA). Accordingly, an acceptable 3.3. Testing for latent mean differences
model fit is indicated by a RMSEA of < 0.08, a SRMR of < 0.08, a
UN

NNFI of > 0.90, and a CFI of > 0.90. To estimate the mean differences between different groups, one
Then, we conducted MGCFAs to examine configural, metric, and of the groups is selected as a reference group and its latent mean is
scalar invariance of the WLEIS. Configural invariance implies the fixed to zero. Latent mean for the other group(s) is freely estimated. In
same number of factors in each group, which is a prerequisite for this study, the male, teenage, and youth groups were selected as refer-
the other tests. Metric invariance implies invariance of factor loadings ence groups, respectively. The results revealed that females had lower
across groups. Scalar Invariance (strict invariance) refers to invariance scores than males on Self-Emotion Appraisals (Z = 2.75, p < 0.05),
of item intercepts across groups. For tests of invariance, the differ- Use of Emotion (Z = 2.99, p < 0.05), and Regulation of Emotion
ence for CFI and RMSEA (CFI and RMSEA) was used as indices. (Z = 6.49, p < 0.05). Furthermore, significant age differences in la
CFI and RMSEA of equal to or < 0.01 indicate strong invariance
(Li, Yang, Ding, & Kong, 2015).
Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2017) xxx-xxx 3

tent means were also obtained. Specifically, youths had higher mean Acknowledgments
scores than teenagers on Self-Emotion Appraisals (Z = 2.55, p < 0.05),
and Use of Emotion (Z = 3.60, p < 0.05). Adults had higher mean This study was funded by the Research Foundation for Advanced
scores than teenagers on Use of Emotion (Z = 3.31, p < 0.05). No Talents of Shaanxi Normal University (1110010805) and the
significant differences were obtained between the youth and adult Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
groups. (GK201703090).

F
4. Discussion References

OO
The present study aimed at examining measurement invariance of Bar-On, R., 1997. Bar-On emotional quotient inventory: Technical manual. Multi-
health Systems, Toronto.
the Chinese WLEIS across gender and age. As expected, the results
Besharat, M.A., 2007. Psychometric properties of Farsi version of the Emotional Intel-
showed that the four-factor structure was replicated in Chinese pop- ligence Scale-41 (FEIS-41). Personality and Individual Differences 43 (5),
ulations. Importantly, the MGCFA results revealed that configural, 9911000.
metric and scalar invariance existed across gender and age. These Fukuda, E., Saklofske, D.H., Tamaoka, K., Fung, T.S., Miyaoka, Y., Kiyama, S., 2011.
findings suggest that the WLEIS can be reliably applied to individu- Factor structure of Japanese versions of two emotional intelligence scales. Interna-
tional Journal of Testing 11 (1), 7192.
als from the gender and age groups. To our knowledge, this is the first

PR
Fukuda, E., Saklofske, D.H., Tamaoka, K., Lim, H., 2012. Factor structure of the Ko-
study to demonstrate measurement invariance of the Chinese WLEIS rean version of Wong and Law's Emotional Intelligence Scale. Assessment 19 (1),
across gender and age. 37.
Despite of measurement invariance of the WLEIS, our findings re- Hu, L.t., Bentler, P.M., 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model-
vealed that the latent means for the WLEIS subscales differed across ing: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1), 155.
groups. Specifically, relative to females, males had higher scores on Kong, F., Zhao, J., 2013. Affective mediators of the relationship between trait emo-
Self-Emotion Appraisals, Use of Emotion, and Regulation of Emo- tional intelligence and life satisfaction in young adults. Personality and Individual
tion, which is consistent with the previous studies (Kong & Zhao, Differences 54 (2), 197201.
Kong, F., Zhao, J., You, X., 2012. Social support mediates the impact of emotional in-

ED
2013; Kong et al., 2012; Mikolajczak et al., 2007; Saklofske et al., telligence on mental distress and life satisfaction in Chinese young adults. Person-
2003). These findings fit well with the fact that the divergent social- ality and Individual Differences 53 (4), 513517.
ization of emotion serves as a function of gender (e.g., Boys don't LaPalme, M.L., Wang, W., Joseph, D.L., Saklofske, D.H., Yan, G., 2016. Measure-
cry). However, they contradict the finding that relative to males, ment equivalence of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale across cul-
tures: An item response theory approach. Personality and Individual Differ-
females score higher on TEI (Besharat, 2007; Mikolajczak et al.,
ences 90, 190198.
2007; Saklofske et al., 2003). The inconsistency may result from Li, T., Saklofske, D.H., Bowden, S.C., Yan, G., Fung, T.S., 2012. The measurement
the choice of measurement instruments of TEI. For example, us- invariance of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) across
CT
ing the Schutte Emotional Intelligence Scale (SEIS), females had three Chinese university student groups from Canada and China. Journal of Psy-
higher scores on Appraisal of Emotions but lower scores on Uti- choeducational Assessment 30 (4), 439452.
Li, M., Yang, D., Ding, C., Kong, F., 2015. Validation of the social well-being scale in
lization of Emotions (Besharat, 2007; Saklofske et al., 2003). Using a Chinese sample and invariance across gender. Social Indicators Re-
the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQ), females had search 121 (2), 607618.
higher scores on Emotionality but lower scores on Self-Control and Libbrecht, N., Beuckelaer, A.D., Lievens, F., Rockstuhl, T., 2014. Measurement in-
Sociability (Mikolajczak et al., 2007). variance of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale Scores: Does the
RE

measurement structure hold across far Eastern and European countries?. Applied
With regard to age groups, the results showed that youths had Psychology 63 (2), 223237.
higher mean scores on Self-Emotion Appraisals and Use of Emotion Luebbers, S., Downey, L.A., Stough, C., 2007. The development of an adolescent mea-
than teenagers. Additionally, adults had higher mean scores on Use sure of EI. Personality and Individual Differences 42 (6), 9991009.
of Emotion than teenagers. No significant differences were obtained Mayer, J.D., Caruso, D.R., Salovey, P., 1999. Emotional intelligence meets traditional
standards for an intelligence. Intelligence 27 (4), 267298.
between the youth and adult groups. These results are consistent with Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Leroy, C., Roy, E., 2007. Psychometric properties of
the studies previously reporting the significant age differences in TEI the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, con-
R

(Luebbers et al., 2007; Sliter et al., 2013; Van Rooy et al., 2005). For struct, and incremental validity in a French-speaking population. Journal of Per-
example, Luebbers et al. (2007) found that among the dimensions of sonality Assessment 88 (3), 338353.
Petrides, K.V., Pita, R., Kokkinaki, F., 2007. The location of trait emotional intelli-
TEI, the ability to use emotions to facilitate performance showed the
gence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology 98 (2), 273289.
strongest correlation with age. These findings fit well with the notion
CO

Saklofske, D.H., Austin, E.J., Minski, P.S., 2003. Factor structure and validity of a trait
that EI is an adaptive ability developing along with cognitive and so- emotional intelligence measure. Personality and Individual Differences 34 (4),
cial skills (Mayer et al., 1999). 707721.
In summary, the present findings provided new insights in the EI Sliter, M., Chen, Y., Withrow, S., Sliter, K., 2013. Older and (emotionally) smarter?
Emotional intelligence as a mediator in the relationship between age and emotional
literature. Specifically, we found that the WLEIS has configural, met- labor strategies in service employees. Experimental Aging Research 39 (4),
ric and scalar invariance across male and female groups as well as 466479.
three age groups (i.e., teenagers, youths and adults). Moreover, tests Van Rooy, D.L., Alonso, A., Viswesvaran, C., 2005. Group differences in emotional
of latent mean differences provide more precise estimates regarding intelligence scores: Theoretical and practical implications. Personality and Individ-
UN

ual Differences 38 (3), 689700.


group differences than t-tests and ANOVA, since these traditional ap- Whitman, D.S., Van Rooy, D.L., Viswesvaran, C., Kraus, E., 2009. Testing the sec-
proaches don't take into account the influence of measurement errors. ond-order factor structure and measurement equivalence of the Wong and Law
Despite of these strengths, two limitations need to be considered. First, Emotional Intelligence Scale across gender and ethnicity. Educational and Psycho-
this study used a Chinese sample, so it is unclear whether measure- logical Measurement 69, 10591074.
Wong, C.-S., Law, K.S., 2002. The effects of leader and follower emotional intelli-
ment invariance of WLEIS can be obtained in other cultural popula- gence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quar-
tions, which should be tested for further research. Second, the study terly 13 (3), 243274.
used only cross-sectional data, so we can't confirm whether measure-
ment invariance still holds across different time points. Thus, testing
the measurement invariance for longitudinal data is also needed in fu-
ture studies.

View publication stats