Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TAKLIMAT PENERBITAN
FAKULTI KEJ. MEKANIKAL
25 HB OGOS 2010
INTRODUCTION
Submission of a manuscript to a
journal is an exciting experience for
researchers
News of acceptance from the Editor
is even more exciting.
News of rejection is usually very
depressing but everyones papers
rejected once.
WHY WE NEED TO PUBLISH?
Ifyourresearchisnotpublishedina
journalitdoesnotexist.
Itmustbepossibletofindit!!
ProfGustaf Olsson
EditorinChief
WaterScience&Technology
WHY WE NEED TO PUBLISH?
International connection/ recognition
Will help to attract more students
(international/locals)
Promotion
Incentives
Scholarship/Fellowship
Enhance career prospect
Teaching quality will be enhanced
Contribute to maintaining UTM as a
Research University
Ibadah to Allah
INDEXED JOURNALS INCENTIVE: 2010
WEB OF SCIENCE
For every 0.1 Impact Factor = RM 200
SCOPUS = RM 200
SECTION C: Quantity and Quality of
Research
C1. Publications
Categories 2010 Score Max Weightage UTM
Score Score
a.Citationindexedpapers
b.Cummulative ImpactFactor
10.5 70%
c.Cummulative citations
d.Noncitationindexedpapers 2.25 15%
Thanks. Good progress and keep pushing. UTM has been sleeping for long and we are
happy on your progress and definitely UTM is in the right track?.perhaps the most
improved university of the year. We dont expect miracle but giving few more years,
you will be there or better. Well done.
I think it is good, apart from doing this, for you to start looking at the real outcomes. For
example Cumulative Impact Factors (CIF) for Faculty Engineering UPM for 2008 alone is
110.797 as compared to entire UTM of 140. Total no of academic staff at FK UPM is 152
and UTM is 10 times more. Perhaps it is better to compare CIF/staff at UTM versus
universities with similar Engineering/technical programs, which is a matched-pair
comparison.
Similarly PhD graduated/staff, IPR/staff etc. My quick comparison UTM with Eng Faculties
among the RUs shows that UTM is still far behind but potentially strong.
Salam
_________________________
Professor Dato' Radin Umar PhD, P.Eng,FASc
Director General
RESEARCH ALLIANCE'S IMPACT FACTOR -
2009
WAT SUS ENE TRA K-E CYB INF M&M ESC CON BIO
4.813 22.777 9.101 1.635 7.800 1.610 21.565 43.820 39.075 4.094 30.457
No culture
I have never published for the past 20
years as a lecturer
I do not know how to get started
I do not have any research grant
Difficulty in dealing with the
editors/reviewers comment
Not Focus
No Mentor
Reasons for Not Publishing in Indexed Journals
Scope of Journal
ISI/Scopus Indexed
IMPACT Factor
Journal Format
Publication frequency
Publication history
Culture of the journal
WHAT IS AN INDEXED JOURNAL?
AjournalisIndexedwhenitsbibliographicand
citationinformationisincludedbythecitationdata
supplier.
ForResearchUniversity thecitationdatasupplier
isScopus&WebofScience
IMPACT FACTOR
A journals impact factor is an annual measure of
the extent to which articles in that journal are cited.
Its a rating thats calculated by the Institute for
Scientific Information and published in an annual
volume of the Science Citation Index or on their
website.
Titleandauthor(s)
Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
Literaturereview(Forareviewpaper)
Analytical/theoreticalwork(ifany)
Experimentalwork
Resultsanddiscussions
Conclusions
Acknowledgements(ifany)
Reference
Appendix(ifany)
TITLE
Whatyourpaperisallabout:
Thetitleofthemanuscriptneedstobeshortand
relevanttothesubjectmatter
Attractthereadersattention
Bespecific
Avoidjargonandabbreviations
AUTHOR(S)NAME
Authornamesandaffiliationsshouldbeinthefollowing
1 2 1
Hassan* ,B.S.Yibas andY.Ali
*1)DepartmentofMechanicalEngineering
UniversityofMalaya
Email:hassan@um.edu.my
2)DepartmentofMechanicalEngineering
KFPUM,
SaudiArabia
Email:bsyilbas@kfpum.edu.sa
Theabstractshouldbeshortandprecise
Sellingpointofthepaper.
Itissummaryofthework Whatyoudidand
significantresults.Nofigure,tableandreferencein
abstract.Objective&implicationmaybeincluded.
About200wordsshouldbesufficient
ABSTRACT
Polypropylene/calciumcarbonate(PP/NPCC)nanocomposites were
preparedusingacorotatingtwinscrewextruderatfillerloadingsof5,10and15weight
%.TheimpactstrengthandmodulusofPPshowedsomeimprovement withthe
incorporationofthenanofiller whilethetensilestrengthdeteriorated.SEM
photomicrographsshowedevidenceofNPCCagglomerationwithinthePPmatrix,
indicatingthatthelevelofshearstressgeneratedduringmeltcompoundingwasfarfrom
adequatetobreakupthenanofiller.WAXDresultsshowedtheappearanceofphase
PPinthenanocomposites with10and15weight%NPCC.TheinfluenceofNPCCfiller
onthecrystallisation behaviour ofPPwerealsoinvestigatedusingaDSC.Incorporation
ofNPCCshiftedthecrystallisation exotherms ofPPtowardshighertemperatures,
indicatingthatthenanofiller hasactedasanucleatingagentforPP.Thereducedvalues
ofhalfcrystallisation timesalsoimplied thattheintroductionofNPCChasacceleratedthe
crystallisation rateofPP.
Keywords:polypropylene,nanosizedcalciumcarbonate,nanocomposites
KEYWORDS
Thekeywordsshouldreflectthesubjectmatterofthe
manuscriptinthesamewaythetitleofthemanuscript
should.
Mostofthekeywordsmayalreadybepresentinthe
title
Thenumberofkeywordsshouldnotbemorethanfive
Useonlyestablishedabbreviations(i.e.DNA)
INTRODUCTION
Theintroductionservesasanorientationforreaders,giving
themtheperspectivetheyneedtounderstandthedetailed
informationcominginlatersections.
Introductionsectionshouldcontainreviewofuptodate
literature.
Thissectionshouldexplainthenoveltyofthework.
Itshouldalsodiscusstheobjectiveandsignificanceofthework.
Thissectionshouldnotnormallyexceedfourtypedpages
(doublespaced)
INTRODUCTION
FirstStage: generalstatementsaboutafiledofresearchto
providethereaderwithasettingfortheproblemtobe
reported.
SecondStage:Morespecificstatementsabouttheaspectsof
theproblemalreadystudiesbyotherresearchers.
ThirdStage: Statementsthatindicatetheneedformore
investigation.
FourthStage: Veryspecificstatementsgivingthe
purpose/objectivesofthewritersstudy.
FifthStage: Optionalstatementsthatgivevaluesor
justificationforcarryingoutthestudy.
INTRODUCTION
Thirdstage:
Statementsthatindicatetheneedformoreinvestigation.
MissingInformation
However,fewstudieshavereported ontheeffectsof
computerassistedinstruction
Butthereislittleinformationavailable ontheairflow
ratesonsimpleflatplatesolarcollectors
INTRODUCTION
Fourthstage:
Veryspecificstatementsgivingthepurpose/objectivesofthe
writersstudy
Eventhoughalotofworkhasbeenreportedonthe
flammabilityofpolymers,verylittleworkhasbeen
reportedontheflammabilityofthecomposites.The
objectiveofthispaperistostudytheeffectsofMg(OH)2
ontheflammabilityandmechanicalpropertiesof
wood/naturalfibre composites.
EXPERIMENTALWORK
Thedescriptionshouldbedetailenoughforothersto
repeattheexperimentbutnottoodetail.
RESULTSANDDISCUSSION
Resultsanddiscussionssectionisthemostimportant
partofthemanuscriptinwhichcriticalanalysisofthe
resultsaredone.
Anylimitationsoftheresultspresentedor
techniquesusedinthestudyaretobehighlightedin
thissection.
Careshouldbetakentoavoidanyerrorsoflogicand
facts.
SufficientnumberofFiguresandTableswithgood
quality
Conclusion
Theconclusionssectionshouldveryimportantpoints
describingtheimportantfindingsofthework
Thissectionshouldreinforce theoriginalityofthework
presented.
Shouldbeconsistentwiththeobjectives highlightthe
achievements.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Theacknowledgementisusedtogivecredittothefunding
authoritiesoftheresearchwork,collaboratorsorothercolleagues
whosenamesdonotappearascoauthorsbuthadmadesome
contributioninproducingthematerialforthemanuscript
REFERENCESTYLE
Harvard
Numbering
IEEE
Endnote(Software)
Others
Techniques and key considerations for
publishing in academic journals
PREPARING THE MANUSCRIPT
Manuscript Language
Manuscript Formatting
Manuscript Checking
Traditionalsubmission(bymail)
Electronicsubmission
Asoneormoreemailattachments
ViaajournalWebsite(EES)onlinesubmission
Inclusionofacoverletter(conventionalor
electronic)
Completionofrequiredformsforexample,
declaration
CoverLetter:
Titleandauthor(s)ofpaper
Typeofsubmission(fulllengtharticle/
technicalnote)
Factthatpaperisnewandnotbeing
submittedelsewhere
Whythepaperisimportant
Somepossiblepeerreviewers(somejournal
requestthat)
COVER LETTER
Dear Editor,
I am pleased to submit a manuscript entitled WATER
ABSORPTION AND HYGROTHERMAL DEGRADATION
PROPERTIES OF LINEAR LOW DENSITY
POLYETHYLENE TOUGHENED POLYLACTIC ACID
NANOCOMPOSITES' to be considered for publication in
Polymer Degradation & Stability. We feel that this
manuscript is relevant for publication in Polymer
Degradation & Stability because of the main interest of the
journal is in thermal degradation of polymer and polymer
nanocomposites. The research paper of our study which
focused in degradation properties of the novel toughened
polylactic acid nanocomposite would make a significant
contribution to knowledge.
The objective of the research reported in this manuscript is
to investigate the water absorption and hygrothermal
degradation properties of montmorillonite (MMT) filled
linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)-toughened PLA
nanocomposites. To the best of our knowledge, no similar
study has been reported.
Looking forward for a favorable reply from you soon.
Thank you.
With regards,
Prof. Dr. Azman Hassan
Deputy Director,
Research Management Centre,
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
COVER LETTER
DearDr.AzmanHassan
Ihavethehonour tosubmittedmypapertopublicationin"MalaysianPolymerJournal",
mysubmittedpaperis:
Yours sincerely
Mawar A.S.
Polymerresearchcenter
UniversityofBali
InitialscreeningbytheJournalEditor
Forappropriatenessofsubjectmatter
Forcompliancewithinstructions
Foroverallquality(sometimes)
PeerReview
Purposes:
Tohelptheeditordecidewhethertopublishthe
paper
Tohelptheauthorsimprovethepaper,whetheror
notthejournalacceptsit.
Somewayspeerreviewersareidentified:
References,literaturesearching,editors knowledge,
databases,authors suggestions
ReviewProcess
Itmaytakefrom1weekto3years
Oneto4reviewersalongwitheditorialcomments
Somejournalseditorsassesssubmissionandprovide
decisionsifnonewcontributions
Accept/reject/revise
Proofpreparationforcheckingbyauthors
Correctionsbyproductiondept
Inpress/queue/articleinpress
Completion(vol,issue,pagenumber,year):
WHAT DOES A REVIEWER CHECK?
ASSESSMENT
Originality
ImportantContribution
ReliabilityofResults
CriticalDiscussion
AdequateReferences
The editors and reviewers need to make
recommendation whether your paper is
acceptable:
Initspresentform
Afteraminorrevision
Afteramajorrevision
Asashortcommunication
Notatall
Outsidethescopeofthisjournal
Bepreparedforrejection
REASONS FOR REJECTION
Thereisinsufficientnew,interestingandsignificant
informationinthepaper
Thepaperwasinappropriatelytargeted.
ThepapersEnglishistoopoortobeunderstoodbyan
internationalreadership
Willprobablynotbecited
Thepaperistoocommercial
Objectivesnotclear
REASONS OF REJECTION
Localissueswithinsufficientinterestforaninternational
audience
Thediscussionwasbadlyargued(majormistakes).
Theentirepaperisbadlystructured.
Theconclusionwaswrong
Lackofhistoryonthetopic(noproperliteraturereview)
Toofewreferences
Thepaperwasgood,butjustnotgoodenough
Bepreparedforrejectionanddonttakeittoohard.
Rememberthatveryfewpapersareimmediately
accepted.
Resubmityourpaperifthejournalwantedtoacceptit
withchanges.Alternatively,ifthejournalrejectsit,send
ittoanotherjournal.
Revisingapaper
Reviseandsubmitpromptly.
Includealettersayingthatwhatrevisions
weremade.
Ifyoudisagreewithanycommentsbythe
reviewersexplainthereasonclearly.
Ifanypointraisedbyrefereeisnotclear,
pleasecommunicatewiththerefereethrough
editor.
Howtoaddressreviewers commentsinrevised
manuscript
DECISION: REJECTION
Thepaperdescribestheresultsofsomeexperimentsobtainedonfive
componentPA/PP/MAPP/POE/claysystems.Theauthorsprepared
selectedblendsand/orcompositesanddeterminedtheirproperties
byalltechniquesavailableintheirlaboratory. Theyreportand
discusscompositecharacteristicsgroupedaccordingtothetechniques
usedandtrytodrawconclusionsabouttheeffectofcomposition on
structureandproperties.Themanuscriptapparentlyseemsto
correspondtothestandardofscientificpapers;however,acloser
scrutinyrevealsnumerousdeficiencies,whichmakeitunacceptable
forpublication.
Apartfrompublishinganotherpaper,Idonotseethephilosophy of
thework,themessagesentoranynewinformationoffered,which
couldbeusedbythescientificcommunityoranyoneinindustrial
practice.
DECISION: REVISION & RESUBMISSION
DearProf.Hassan:
Yourmanuscript#APP2009030676entitled"MECHANICAL,THERMALANDMORPHOLOGICAL
PROPERTIESOFPOLYLACTICACID/LINEARLOWDENSITYPOLYETHYLENEBLENDS"whichyousubmittedto
theJournalofAppliedPolymerScience,hasbeenreviewed.Iamsorrytoinformyouthatbasedonthe
reviewers'comments,ImustaskyoutoreviseandresubmitthismanuscriptbeforeIcanreachan
editorialdecision. Thecommentsfromreviewersareincludedatthebottomofthisletter.
Pleasenotethatresubmittingyourmanuscriptdoesnotguarantee eventualacceptance,andthatyour
resubmissionwillbesubjecttorereviewbythereviewersbeforeadecisionisrendered.
Ifyouchoosetoresubmityourmanuscript,gotohttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/appandlogintoyour
AuthorCenter.Lookfor"ManuscriptswithDecisions"andselect"CreateaResubmission"locatednextto
themanuscriptnumber.Then,followthestepsforresubmittingyourmanuscript.Pleasesubmityour
revisionby14Oct2009.
MayItakethisopportunitytothankyouforconsideringourJournalforthepublicationofyourwork.We
hopethatyouwillconsiderresubmittingyourmanuscripttotheJournal.
Withkindregards,
Dr.AndyChang
AssociateEditor,JournalofAppliedPolymerScience
DECISION:ACCEPTANCE
DearDr.Hassan,
Thankyouforsubmittingyourrevisedmanuscriptentitled"Heatsealability ofLaminatedFilmswithLLDPE
andLDPEassealantMaterialsinBarSealingApplication"tothe JournalofAppliedPolymerScience.Itisa
pleasuretoacceptyourmanuscriptinitscurrentformforpublication.
Asignedcopyrighttransferagreementisrequiredforpublication.Youcanaccessthecopyrighttransfer
agreementathttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com/homepages/36444/nscta.pdfordownloadthe
attachedfile.PleasesignandfaxthecopyrighttransferagreementtoAssistantManagingEditorTiffany
McKerahan at(+1)2017486052oremailittotmckerah@wiley.com.
Youruploadedmanuscriptfilesarecurrentlybeingexaminedforadherencetoprintguidelines.If
adjustmentsarerequiredwewillcontactyouwithmoredetailsandinstructionsshortly.
MayItakethisopportunitytothankyouforcontributingyourworktoourJournal.
Sincerely,
Prof.EricBaer
EditorinChief,JournalofAppliedPolymerScience
Answeringqueries
Queries:questionsfromthemanuscript
Sometopicsofqueries:
o Inconsistencies
o Missinginformation
o Ambiguities
Advice:Respondpromptly,politely,andcompletely
yetconcisely.
DEALING WITH REVIEWER - RESPONSE
DearProfessorAnneHiltner,
Wefirstgratefullythankyouforacceptingourmanuscript (#APP2007020609)entitled
Interfaceandmechanicalpropertiesofperoxidecuredsilicatenanofiber/rubbercomposites",and
tworeviewersforgoodsuggestionaswell.Wealsofeelterribly sorrytosubmittherevised
manuscriptsolate.
Basedontworeviewerscomments,somechangesincludingEnglishimprovementsand
supplementshavebeendoneintherevisedmanuscript,inwhichthefontswerehighlightedwith
redcolor.Anothertwelvereferenceswereadded.Wethinkitismoreunderstandableandmore
explicit,comparedwiththeoldmanuscript.
Thankyouagain.
Sincerelyyours,
MingTian
Dr.ProfessorofBeijingUniversityofChemicalandTechnology
Addressingreviewers commentsinrevised
manuscript
Whenyourewritethepaper,pleaseimprovetheenglish
expressionthoroughly,andfollowSTRICTLYtheformat
describedintheInstructionstoauthorsofthejournals:
TheEnglishhasbeencheckedandimprovedthoroughly.
Therevisedmanuscriptbeenpreparedaccordingtothe
journalformat.
AsuggestionistoaddtheMalaysian inthetitle,i.e.END
USEENERGYANALYSISINTHEMALAYSIAN INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
THEMALAYSIAN hasbeenaddedinrevisedtitleofthe
manuscript.
Addressingreviewers commentsinrevisedmanuscript
Isuggest,howeverthattheauthorsconsiderthefollowing
commentsifpossible:
ItwouldbegoodtocalculateexpectedGHGemmisions
reductionintonsforthepotentialsavingsinenergyusing
standardemissionsfactors.
Emissionreductionsassociatedwiththeenergysavingshave
beenestimatedandpresentedinTable8.Detailsof
estimationformulationhavebeenaddedinsection2.5.2.
Addressingreviewers commentsinrevisedmanuscript
Abstract
Line8;HowispossibletoconcludethatTEMmicrographsshowatransitionfromnanosized
particlestoclusterformationwithincreaseinphosphorconcentrationwhenonlyone
concentrationwasshown(Figure4)?
Thefollowingmicrograph(Fig4b)hasbeenaddedtoreinforcethestatementinagreement
withthereviewerssentiment.
Figure4b:TEMmicrographof5%phosphorinPMMA
Introduction
Explainwhythesetwopolymerswereselectedforthestudy.Isthereanyexpecteddifference
betweenthesetwopolymersintermsoftheeffectofphosphor?
Thecriterionforchoiceofpolymertypewastohaveareadilyavailableandenvironmentally
stablesemicrystalline (LDPE)andanamorphous(PMMA)polymerrespectively.Some
semicrystalline polymersareknowntoundergostrainrelateddeformationsthatarelikelyto
facilitatetheoccurrenceofphosphorescence,hencethechoiceofLDPE,whilePMMAwasmore
orlessacontrolparameter.
TheaboveexplanationhasbeenappropriatelyincludedintheIntroductionsection(1.0).
Addressingreviewers commentsinrevisedmanuscript
ResultsandDiscussion
Pg5.Theintroductionofthephosphordidnotsignificantlychangethegeneralstructureofthepolymer.
Isthisexpectedornot?Providereasons.
Thisismoreorlessexpectedsincetheconditionsofmixingwerenotexpectedtoleadtostrongenough
interactionsforbondformation.
Pg6;DSCstudyofLDPE:IsdeltaHcal (fromTable1)similartodeltaHexpected?
Yes,indeedHcal isthesameasHexpected,i.e.,theenthalpywhichthepolymerinthecompositewould
havehad,wereittoexistaloneinthecomposite.
Itisanexpressionoftheenthalpyofthepolymercontent,inthecomposite,asafractionoftheenthalpy
ofthepurepolymer.
WhatistheequationusedtocalculatedeltaHcal ?
Hcal =(mass%ofpolymerincomposite)(enthalpyofpurepolymer)
DoestheexplanationofFigure7andTable1basedonanyreference?Providereferencefromjournal
papers.
Thefollowingreferencehasbeenadded.
11.Mbhele,Z.H.G.Salemane,M.G.Sittert,C.E.Nedeljkovi,J.M.Djokovic,V.Luyt.A.S.Fabricationand
CharacterizationofSilverPolyvinyl AlcoholNanocomposites.Chem.Mater.(2003);15(26),5019.
ReviewingProofs
Proof:copyoftypesetmaterialtocheck
CommonlyprovidedasaPDFfile
Mustbereviewedpromptly:therefore:
Ifyouremailaddresschanges,besureto
informthejournal proactive.
Reviewingproofs(cont)
Somethingstocheck:
Completeness(presenceofallcomponents)
Absenceoftypographicalerrorsintextand
references
Placementoffiguresandtables
Qualityofreproductionoffigures
Note:Thisisnotthetimetorewritethepaper.
STRATEGIES FOR GETTING
PAPERS PUBLISHED
STRATEGIES FOR GETTING PAPERS
PUBLISHED
Workshopforbrainstormingofresearchgrantsand
postgraduatetopics emphasizeonnoveltyandtechnical
contentsoftheresearchproposalsandpostgraduatetopics
Targettherightjournals
Checkandadheretojournalguidelinestoauthors.
Usethepublishedpapersasabasisforcomparison.
Duringsubmissionwriteapolitecoverlettertotheeditor
whichreflectyourinterestandprofessionalism
STRATEGIES FOR GETTING PAPERS
PUBLISHED
Theresearchreportedmustbeinteresting,originalandprovide
importantcontributiontoknowledge
Whenresubmittingapaper,writealettertotheeditorabout
howyouaddressedthereviewers concerns.Ifyoudisagree
withanycomments,saysoandjustifyyourstand.
Becomefamiliarwiththeselectioncriteriaforpapers(guidelines
toreviewers).
STRATEGIES FOR GETTING PAPERS
PUBLISHED
Checkthoroughlyforgrammarandspelling.
Whenresubmittingapaper,writealettertotheeditorabout
howyouaddressedthereviewers concerns.Ifyoudisagree
withanycomments,saysoandjustifyyourstand.
CollaborationandNetworking beateamplayer
Thankyoufortheattention