Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Department of Civil & Building Engineering
LECTURE NOTES
By
OLENG MORRIS
(Course Lecturer)
0703688747 or 0772285215
wotamuko@gmail.com
Preamble
Brief Description
Bridges the transition from Analysis to design, by explaining how forces used in analysis are
obtained from people and other objects and the materials of the structure.
Explains the properties of materials that make up reinforced concrete.
Reviews analysis using a method that can be used with an electronic calculator and computer
to obtain applied internal actions / forces
Explains the concept of design of all the major components of a reinforced concrete building
where the strength of these components must be greater than the applied forces by a
reasonable margin, and where each component must be checked for each of the possible
modes of failure.
Objectives
By the end of the course the student should be able to:
Calculate the forces applied to the structure arising from its weight, expected usage and
external loads;
Demonstrate understanding of the behaviour of reinforced concrete and its constituent
materials and be able to predict its behaviour under all the expected loading and
environmental conditions;
Analyze; i.e. determine all internal actions (Axial load, shear force, bending and torsion
moments) on each member of the structure using a calculator and computer;
Identify all possible causes and modes of failure;
Design all the major components of a reinforced concrete building to prevent any mode of
failure occurring.
Detailed Course Description
Introduction to Limit State Design (5 hours)
Ultimate limit state: considering Strength, stability and robustness
Serviceability limit state: Deflection, Durability (fire and corrosion resistance), Vibration
Material properties for steel and concrete and partial safety factor for materials.
Design Standards: Historical review, Elastic Analysis; CP114, Limit state Design; CP110 and BS
8110, EC2
Loading: dead, wind , imposed and notional loads , load combinations and Partial safety factors
for loads
Robustness & Design of ties, Importance of robustness in explosions and terrorists attack.
Analysis of framed structures using moment distribution and computer applications
Shear, Bond & Torsion (5 hours)
Shear strength of a reinforced concrete beam without links
Shear resistance of links
Shear resistance of Bent up bars
Shear in slabs
Local bond, Anchorage bond and length
Table of Contents
Preamble .............................................................................................................................................. i
Brief Description ............................................................................................................................. i
Objectives ........................................................................................................................................ i
Detailed Course Description ............................................................................................................ i
Modes of Course Delivery ............................................................................................................. iii
Assessment .................................................................................................................................... iii
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... iv
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1
1.0 General ..................................................................................................................................1
Assumptions made in structural design .......................................................................................1
Structural design procedure .........................................................................................................1
1.1 Historical Perspective ...........................................................................................................1
1.1.1 General ...........................................................................................................................1
1.1.2 The Elastic Design. ........................................................................................................2
1.1.2 CP 114 ...........................................................................................................................2
1.3 Introduction to limit state design. .........................................................................................2
1.4 Introduction to Eurocode 2 ...................................................................................................2
1.5 Why change to Euro code II from BS8110 ...........................................................................3
CHAPTER II. PROPERTIES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE........................................................4
2.0 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................4
2.1 Composite action...................................................................................................................4
2.2 Stress strain relations .........................................................................................................5
2.2.1 Stress Strain relationship of concrete .........................................................................5
2.2.2 Stress- Strain relationship of steel .................................................................................7
2.3 Shrinkage and thermal movement.........................................................................................8
2.3.1 Causes of shrinkage .......................................................................................................8
2.3.2 Calculation of stresses induced by shrinkage ................................................................8
2.3.2 Factors affecting shrinkage ..........................................................................................11
2.4 Creep ................................................................................................................................11
2.4.1 General .........................................................................................................................11
2.4.2 Characteristic of Creep ................................................................................................11
2.4.3 Effects of Creep ...........................................................................................................12
CHAPTER III. LIMIT STATE DESIGN ..........................................................................................13
3.0 Introduction .........................................................................................................................13
3.0.1 The permissible stress method. ....................................................................................13
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION
1.0 General
A structure is any load bearing construction; in other words it is an organized assembly of connected
parts designed to provide mechanical resistance and stability.
Uganda being a former British protectorate has followed the British system of design. Upto 1972, the
British system was designing structures using the elastic design/ Modular ratio method of designing.
mainly applicable to ordinary buildings. It is largely similar in scope to BS 8110 which it will replace
by about 2010. Design of building structures cannot wholly be undertaken using Part 1.1 of Eurocode
2, however. Reference will have to be made to a number of other documents, notably EN 1990
(Eurocode 0) and Eurocode 1 to determine the design values of actions (section 8.5), BS 4449 for
mechanical properties of reinforcing steel (section 8.4.1), Part 1.2 of Eurocode 2 for fire design
(section 8.7.1), BS 8500 and EN 206 for durability design (section 8.7.2) and Eurocode 7 for
foundation design (Fig. 8.1).
The main reason cited for structuring the information in this way is to avoid repetition and make the
design guidance in Part 1.1 more concise than BS 8110. Part 1.1 of Eurocode 2, hereafter referred to
as EC 2, was issued as a preliminary standard or ENV in 1992 and in final form as BS EN 1992-1-1
in 2004. The following subjects are covered in EC 2:
Section 1: General
Section 2: Basis of design
Section 3: Materials
Section 4: Durability and cover to reinforcement
Section 5: Structural analysis
Section 6: Ultimate limit states
Section 7: Serviceability limit states
Section 8: Detailing of reinforcement and prestressing tendons General
Section 9: Detailing of members and particular rules
Section 10: Additional rules for precast concrete elements and structures
Section 11: Lightweight aggregate concrete structures
Section 12: Plain and lightly reinforced concrete structures
Also included are ten annexes which provide supplementary information on a range of topics
including creep and shrinkage, reinforcing steel, durability design and analysis of flat slabs and shear
walls.
As seen from table 2-1, concrete is poor in tension, good in compression, and fair in shear. On the
other hand, steel is very good in tension, compression and shear. Thus, when they are combined, the
steel is able to provide the tensile strength and probably some of the shear strength while the concrete,
strong in compression, protects the steel to give durability and fire resistance.
i) In beams, slabs, and stair cases, where there is tension, the concrete must be reinforced by steel.
ii) In areas where the compression forces are very high such as columns, concrete must be
reinforced by steel and the steel must be tied and surrounded by concrete in order not to buckle.
Steel is poor in durability and fire resistance while concrete is good, therefore concrete must provide
cover to protect the steel.
Figure 2-1 illustrates the behavior of a simply supported beam subject to bending and shows the
position of steel reinforcement to resist the tensile forces, while the compression forces in the top of
the beam are carried by the concrete.
Load A
Compression
c <0
simplification
fc actual
cu fc peak stress
where Ecm is in KN / mm 2
f ck is in N / mm 2 , f ck is strength at 28days
Thus Ecm is also for 28days.
The modulus of elasticity is required.
(i) When investigating deflection of a structure.
(ii) When investigating cracking of a structure.
(iii)When considering both short term and long term effects of creep and shrinkage.
c) Poissons Ratio
For design purpose; the Poissons ratio for elastic strain is 0.2
0.2% proof
Yield stress
stress
stress
stress
The specified strength used in design is based on either the yield stress or a specified proof stress. A
0.2 per cent proof stress is defined in figure 2.4 by the broken line drawn parallel to the linear part of
the stress-strain curve.
Removal of the load within the plastic range would result in the stress-strain diagram following a line
approximately parallel to the loading portion - see line BC in figure 2.4. The steel will be left with a
permanent strain AC, which is known as slip. If the steel is again loaded, the stress-strain diagram
will follow the unloading curve until it almost reaches the original stress at B and then it will curve
in the direction of the first loading. Thus, the proportional limit for the second loading is higher than
for the initial loading. This action is referred to as strain hardening or work hardening.
B
stress
A C
Fig.2.4 Strain hardening
A low water-cement ratio will help to reduce drying shrinkage by keeping to a minimum the volume
of moisture that can be lost.
If the change in volume of the concrete is allowed to take place freely and without restraint, there
will be no stress change within the concrete. Restraint of the shrinkage, on the other hand, will cause
tensile strains and stresses. The restraint may be caused externally by fixity with adjoining members
or friction against an earth surface, and internally by the action of the steel reinforcement. For a long
wall or floor slab, the restraint from adjoining concrete may be reduced by constructing successive
bays instead of alternate bays. This allows the free end of every bay to contract before the next bay
is cast.
When tensile stresses caused by shrinkage or thermal movement exceed the strength of concrete,
cracking will occur. To control cracking, steel reinforcement must be provided close to the concrete
surface.
Original member -
as cast
cs
Plain concrete -
unrestrained
ct
Reinforced concrete -
unrestrained
sc
ct
Reinforced concrete -
fully restrained
Solution.
As A
1% 100 s 0.01
Ac Ac
From equation (3)
cs E s
stress in reinforcement f sc
1 nAs / Ac
Es 200
where Ecs 200106 , Ecm 15KN / mm2 , Es 200KN / mm2 and n
Ecm 15
200 106 200 103
f sc
1 200 / 15 0.01
f sc 35.3 N / mm2 ( compression)
As
stress in reinforcement f ct f sc
Ac
0.01 35.3
0.35 N / mm 2 (tension)
Note: The stresses produced in members free from external restraint are generally small as example
1.1, and can be easily withstood both by the steel and the concrete.
Solution.
If the member in example 1.1 was fully restrained, the stress in the concrete would be given by
f ct ct Ecm ;
where ct cs 200106
then
f ct 200 106 15 103
3.0 N / mm 2
Table 2-3 (Table 3.4 of euro code II) gives the final shrinkage strain of a normal weight concrete
subject to a compressive stress not exceeding 0.45 f ck at the time of first loading.
i) For values in table 3.4 variation in temperature between 20C and 40C are acceptable.
ii) Variations in humidity between relative humidity (RH 20% 100%) are acceptable.
iii) Linear interpolation between the values in the table are acceptable.
Table 2.3- Final shrinkage strain cs of normal weight concrete (Table 3.4 of euro code II)
Location of the Relative humidity Notional size 2 Ac / u (mm)
member (%) 150 600
Inside 50 -0.60 -0.50
Outside 80 -0.33 -0.28
where Ac cross-sectional area of concrete
u perimeter of that area
2.4 Creep
2.4.1 General
Creep is the continuous deformation of a member under sustained load. It is a phenomenon associated
with many materials, but it is particularly evident with concrete. It depends on;
i) The aggregates and the mix design (Composition of concrete).
ii) Ambient humidity
iii) Member cross-section.
iv) Age at first loading.
v) Duration of loading.
vi) Magnitude of loading.
Values in table 2-4 (Table 3.3 of euro code II) can be considered as the final creep coefficient (, t o )
of a normal weight concrete subjected to a compressive stress not exceeding 0.45 f ck .
In the load factor method the ultimate strength of the materials should be used in the calculations. As
this method does not apply factors of safety to the material stresses, it cannot directly take account
of the variability of the materials, and also it cannot be used to calculate the deflections or cracking
at working loads. Again, this is a design method that has now been effectively superseded by modern
limit state design methods.
i) Robustness
To be robust means that the layout of the structure should be such that damage to a small area or
failure of a single element will not lead to progressive collapse.
To achieve robustness;
i) The structure must be able to resist a minimum horizontal load.
ii) The elements of the structure must be provided with ties.
n
H j = Vji v H fd = ( Nbc + Nba ) v/2 H j as in fig. a)
The general stability and robustness of a building structure can be increased by providing
reinforcement acting as ties. These ties should act both vertically between roof and foundations, and
horizontally around and across each floor (figure 3.2), and all external vertical load-bearing members
should be anchored to the floors and beams.
Horizontal ties
Horizontal ties should be provided for all buildings, irrespective of height, in three ways:
1. Peripheral ties.
2. Internal ties.
3. Column and Wall ties.
a) Peripheral ties.
Peripheral tie must be provided by reinforcement at each floor or roof level.
Peripheral tie must be continuous.
This reinforcement must lie within 1.2m from the edge of building or within the perimeter wall.
It should be capable of resisting a force of at least Ft .
Ft (20 4no ) or 60KN whichever is less.
no number of storeys in structure.
b) Internal Ties
Internal ties should be provided at each floor in two perpendicular directions.
They should be continuous throughout their length.
They should be anchored at each end, either to the peripheral tie or to the continuous column or
wall ties.
They may be located as follows;
a) Spread evenly in slabs
b) Grouped in beams
c) Grouped in walls. Where walls are used, the tie reinforcement must be within 0.5m
of the top or bottom of the floor slab.
Internal ties should be able to resist a tensile force T.
F (G Qk ) Lr
T t k or 1.0 Ft whichever is greater.
7.5 5
where (Gk Qk ) the characteristic load per m 2 of the floor considered.
Lr the greatest horizontal distance in the direction of the tie between the centres of
vertical load-bearing members.
If the ties are grouped in walls or beams, their maximum spacing should be limited to 1.5Lr .
Spacing 1.5Lr
7m
Transverse beams
4 bays @ 6.5m=26m
Therefore force along length of building 81.1 7 567.7KN , hence bar area required in each
567.7 103
longitudinal beam is 567mm 2
2 500
This could be provided by 2 H20 bars.
ii) Stability
Building structures are classified into two types.
a) Braced, and
b) Unbraced
A braced structure is one that resists lateral loads by means of bracing. Lateral loads include;
wind loads, and
seismic loads (earthquake loads)
Bracing in RC structures include;
Shear walls
RC lift shafts
RC stair wells
The bracing must be able to transmit the horizontal loads down to foundation.
iii) Strength
The structure should be adequately strong to carry all applied loads without collapse.
Exposure conditions are given in table 4.1 of the code and Minimum cover requirements for exposure
conditions are given in table 4.2.
Table 3-1 (Table 4.1 of Euro code II) Exposure classes related to environmental conditions
Exposure class Example of environmental conditions
1 interior of buildings for normal habitation or offices a
dry environment
2 a - interior of buildings where humidity is high (e.g. laundries)
without - exterior components
humid frost - components in non-aggressive soil and/or water
environment b - exterior components exposed to frost
With - components in non-aggressive soil and/or water and exposed
frost to frost
- interior components when the humidity is high and exposed
to frost
3
humid environment with frost Interior and exterior components to frost and de-icing agents
and
de-icing salts
4 a - components completely or partially submerged in seawater,
without or in the splash
frost - components in saturated salt air (coastal area)
seawater environment b - components partially submerged in seawater or in the splash
With zone and exposed to frost
frost - components in saturated salt air and exposed to frost
The following classes may occur alone or in combination with the above classes:
5 a - slightly aggressive chemical environment (gas, liquid or
aggressive chemical solid)
b
environment - aggressive industrial atmosphere
b moderately aggressive chemical environment (gas, liquid or
solid)
c highly aggressive chemical environment (gas, liquid or solid)
a
This exposure class is valid only as long as during construction the structure or some of its
components is not exposed to more severe conditions over a prolonged period of time.
b
Chemically aggressive environments are classified in ISO/DP 9690. The following equivalent
exposure conditions may be assumed:
Exposure class 5a: ISO classification A1G,A1L,A1S
Exposure class 5b: ISO classification A2G,A2L,A2S
Exposure class 5c: ISO classification A3G,A3L,A3S
Table 3-2 (Table 4.2 of Euro code II) Minimum cover requirement for normal weight concrete 1)
Exposure class, according to Table 4.1
1 2a 2b 3 4a 4b 5a 5b 5c
2) Reinforcement 15 20 25 40 40 40 25 30 40
Minimum cover
(mm)
Prestressing 25 30 35 50 50 50 35 40 50
steel
NOTES
1. In order to satisfy the provisions of 4.1.3.3 P(3), these minimum values for cover should be associated
with particular concrete qualities, to be determined from Table 3 in ENV 206.
2. For slab elements, a reduction of 5mm may be made for exposure classes 2-5.
3. A reduction of 5mm may be made where concrete of strength class C40/50 and above is used for
reinforced concrete in exposure classes 2a-5b, and for prestressed concrete in exposure classes 1-5b.
However, the minimum cover should be less than that for Exposure Class 1 in Table 4.2.
4. For exposure class 5c, the use of a protective barrier, to prevent direct contact with the aggressive media,
should be provided.
cover
bundle
ii) cover min d 32mm
n g
where the diameter of the bar
n the equivalent diameter for a bundle
d g the largest nominal maximum aggregate size.
The minimum concrete cover to all reinforcement including links and stirrups should not be less than
the appropriate values of given in Table 4.2, for the relevant exposure class defined in Table 4.1.
Nominal Cover
This is the cover used in design and specify on drawing and nominal cover is given by nominal cover
which is equal to minimum cover + h .
where h is Tolerance on cover to reinforcement and given by; 5mm h 10mm .
h depends on;
i) Type and size of structural element/member.
ii) Type of construction.
iii) Standards of workmanship.
iv) Quality control
v) Detailing practice.
f m mean strength, f m
f
n
f =values of cube strength
n = number of cubes tested.
standard deviation, is a measure of quality control
( f fm )2
1/ 2
n
The relationship between characteristic and mean values accounts for variations in results of test
specimens and will, therefore, reflect the method and control of manufacture, quality of
constructions, and nature of the material.
Mean strength ( fm )
Characteristic
strength ( f k )
number of
test specimens
1.64
strength
Fig.3-4 Normal frequency distribution of strengths
3.2.2 Concrete (Cl. 3.1, EC 2)
a) Compressive strength of concrete
Unlike BS 8110, the design rules in EC 2 are based on the characteristic (5 per cent) compressive
cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days ( f ck ). Equivalent cube strengths ( f ck ,cube ) are included in EC
2 but they are only regarded as an alternative method to prove compliance. Generally, the cylinder
strength is approximately 0.8 the cube strength of concrete i.e. f ck 0.8 f ck ,cube .
b) Tensile strength of concrete
The tensile strength of concrete is the maximum stress the concrete can withstand when subjected to
uniaxial tension (tensile force applies in one axis).
The mean tensile strength f ct .k of concrete may be derived from equations 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
f ctm 0.3 f ck( 2 / 3) Nmm 2 (3.1)
f ctk 0.05 0.7 f ctm Nmm 2 (3.2)
f ctk 0.95 1.3 f ctm Nmm 2 (3.3)
where f ck is the characteristic compressive strength.
f ctm is the mean tensile strength.
f ctk 0.05 is the lower characteristic compressive strength at 5% fractile.
f ctk 0.95 is the upper characteristic compressive strength where 95% fractile.
Table 3-3 shows the actual strength classes commonly used in reinforced concrete design.
Table 3-3 Concrete strength classes, characteristic compressive strength f ck (cylinders), mean tensile
2
strength f ctm , and characteristic tensile strength f ctk of the concrete (in N / mm ) (based on Table 3.1, EC
2)
Strength C12/15 C16/20 C20/25 C25/30 C30/37 C35/45 C40/50 C45/55 C50/60
Class of
Concrete
f ck 12 16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
f ck ,cube 15 20 25 30 37 45 50 55 60
f ctm 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.8 4.1
f ctk 0.05 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.9
2.0 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.8 4.2 4.6 4.9 5.3
f ctk 0.95
High-yield bars are manufactured with a ribbed surface or in the form of a twisted square surface.
Square twisted bars have inferior bond characteristics and have been used in the past, although they
are now obsolete. Deformed bars have a mechanical bond with the concrete. The bending of high-
yield bars through a small radius is liable to cause tension cracking of the steel, and to avoid this the
radius of the bend should not be less than two times the nominal bar size for small bars( 16mm ).
Ribbed high yield bars may be classified as:
Class A- which is normally associated with small diameter ( 12mm ) cold-worked bars used in mesh
and fabric. This is the lowest ductility category and will include limits on moment
redistribution which can be applied and higher quantities for fire resistance.
Class B- which is most commonly used for reinforcing bars.
Class C- high ductility which may be used in earthquake design or similar situation.
Table 3-5(Table 5, Eurocode II): Differences between current British Standards and EN10080
Property BS4449 and BS4483 EN10080
Specific characteristic yield strength Grade 460N / mm
2
500N / mm 2
Grade 250N / mm
2 Not included
Bond strength for;
i) Ribbed bars/wires Deformed type 2 High bond
ii) Twisted bars Deformed type 1 Not included
iii) Plain bars Round plain bars Not included
Table 3-6
CP110 BS8110 EC2
High yield 460 Ribbed T
High bond 500
410
460 Twisted Y
425 Y
460
485
Table 3-7 Tensile and other properties of steel for the reinforcement of concrete
Ductility Class
Property
A B C
2
Characteristic yield strength, f yk ( Nmm ) 500
2
Youngs modulus KNmm 200
Characteristic strain at ultimate force, uk (%) 2.5 5.0 7.5
3.3.2 Partial factors of safety for actions ( f )
Action is the Euro code terminology for load. EC 2 defines an action as a set of forces, deformations
(e.g. differential settlement and temperature effects) or accelerations acting on the structure.
Errors and inaccuracies may be due to a number of causes:
i) design assumptions and inaccuracy of calculation;
ii) possible unusual increases in the magnitude of the actions;
iii) unforeseen stress redistributions;
iv) constructional inaccuracies.
These cannot be ignored, and are taken into account by applying a partial factor of safety ( f ) on the
characteristic actions, so that
design value of action = characteristic action partial factor of safety ( f )
Recommended values of partial factors of safety are given in tables 3-10 and 3-11 according to the
different categorizations of actions shown in the tables.
Actions may be permanent ( Gk ), e.g. self-weight of structure, fittings and fixed equipment, or
variable ( Qk ), e.g. weight of occupants, wind and snow loads.
The characteristic permanent load Gk is computed from the self-weight of the structure,
weight of finishes, ceilings, services and partitions.
The self-weight is estimated from assumed member sizes.
The weight of materials is obtained from BS648 schedule of materials for building
construction.
The characteristic variable load Qk is caused by movable objects such as people, furniture
and equipment. These are given in BS6399 part 1.
The characteristic wind load Wk depends on location, shape and dimensions of the building.
The design of buildings for wind loads can be based on any of the following;
i) CP3 chapter 5 part 2
ii) BS6399 part II
Variable actions are also categorized as leading (the predominant variable action on the structure
such as an imposed crowd load- Qk .1 ) and accompanying (secondary variable action such as the
effect of wind loading, Qk ,i ,where the subscript I indicates the i th action).
Solution:
The characteristic yield stress of the steel is 500 N / mm 2 . Carry out the calculation using limit state
design with the following factors of safety:
G 1.35 for the permanent action,
Q 1.5 for the variable action,
m 1.15 for the steel strength.
Design value G permanent action Q variable action
1.35 3.0 1.5 2.0
7.05 KN
characteristic yield sress
Design stress
m
500
1.15
434 N / mm 2
designvalue
Required cross sectional area
design stress
7.05 103
434
16.2 mm 2
beam
permanent load 20 KN/m
A B C
foundation
(a) 6m 2m
1.1 permanent
0.9 permanent load load
A B C
Solution:
A 7 per cent increase in the variable action will not endanger the structure, since the actual uplift will
only be 7.3 KN as calculated previously. In fact in this case it would require an increase of 61 per
cent in the load before the uplift would exceed the weight of a 38 KN foundation.
Parts (a) and (b) of example 3.3 illustrate how the limit state method of design can ensure a safer
result when the stability or strength of a structure is sensitive to a small numerical difference between
the effects of two opposing action of a similar magnitude.
Tables 3.13 and 3.14 show the recommended values of partial safety factor for permanent, G , and
variable actions, Q , for the ultimate limit states of equilibrium (EQU) and strength (STR). It can be
seen that the maximum values of G and Q are 1.35 and 1.5 respectively. The comparable values
in BS 8110 are 1.4 and 1.6. It can also be seen that the partial safety factors for actions depend on a
number of other aspects including the category of limit state as well as the effect of the action on the
design situation under consideration. For example, when checking for the limit states of equilibrium
and strength, the maximum values of G are 1.1 and 1.35, respectively. However, when checking
for equilibrium alone, G is taken to be 1.1 if the action increases the risk of instability (unfavourable
action) or 0.9 if the action reduces the risk of instability (favourable action). For a given limit state
several combinations of loading may have to be considered in order to arrive at the value of the design
action on the structure (see Table 3.13).
In equation 3.1, Frep may be the characteristic value of a permanent or leading variable action ( Fk ),
or the accompanying value ( Fk ) of a variable action. In turn, the accompanying value of a variable
action may be the combination value ( o Fk ), the frequent value ( 1 Fk ) or the quasi-permanent
value ( 2 Fk ). The frequent value and the quasi permanent values are used to determine values of
accidental actions, e.g. impact and explosions, and to check serviceability criteria (deflection and
cracking). The combination value is given by
Combination value = o Fk (3.2)
where o is the combination factor obtained from Table 3.12 and is a function of the type of variable
action. The factor o has been introduced to take account of the fact that where a structure is subject
to, say, two independent variable actions, it is unlikely that both will reach their maximum value
simultaneously. Under these circumstances, it is assumed that the leading variable action (i.e. Qk .1 )
is at its maximum value and any accompanying variable actions will attain a reduced value, i.e.
oQk ,i , where i > 1. Leading and accompanying variable actions are assigned by trial and error as
discussed below.
Table 3-13 Load combinations and partial safety/combination factors for the ultimate limit state of strength
Limit state Load Type
Permanent, Gk Variable, Qk Wind, W k
Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable Favourable Unfavourable
Equilibrium 1.10 0.9 1.5 0 1.5 0
Table 3-14 Load combinations and partial safety/combination factors for the ultimate limit state of strength
Limit state/Load combination Load Type
Permanent, Gk Variable, Qk Wind,
Unfavourabl Favourable Unfavourabl Favourable Wk
e e
Strength
1. Permanent and variable 1.35/1.35 1.0 1.5 0 -
2. Permanent and wind 1.35/1.35 1.0 - - 1.5
3. Permanent, imposed and
wind 1.35 1.0 1.5 0,1 1.5 0, 2
(a) 1.35/1.35 1.0 1.5 0 1.5 0
(b) 1.0 1.5 0 0
1.35/1.35 1.5
(c)
For continuous beams with cantilevers, the partial safety factor for the favourable effect of the
permanent action should be taken as 1.0 for the span adjacent to the cantilever.
The partial safety factor for earth pressures should be taken as 1.30 when unfaourable and 0.0 when
faourable.
Table 3-15 Load Combinations and Partial Safety Factors f at Serviceability Limit State
Load Combination Permanent Load, Gk Variable Load, Qk Wind Load, Wk
Permanent + Variable 1.0 1.0 -
Permanent + Wind 1.0 - 1.0
Permanent + Variable + Wind 1.0 0.9 0.9
Using the partial safety factors given in Table 3.14, the design value of the action effect is given by
E d 1.35Gk 1.5Qk (load combinations 1 and 2, Table 3.14)
The design value of an action effect due to permanent and two (or more) variable actions, e.g. dead
plus imposed and wind load, is obtained from equation 3.4.
E d G , jGk , j Q ,1Qk ,1 Q ,i 0,i Qk ,i (3.4)
j 1 i 1
Note that this expression yields two (or more) estimates of design actions and the most onerous
should be selected for design. For example, if a structure is subjected to permanent, office and wind
loads of G k , Qk and W k the values of the design actions are:
Ed 1.35Gk , j 1.5Qk 1.5 0.5Wk (load combinations 3(b), Table 3.14)
and
Ed 1.35Gk , j 1.5 0.7Qk 1.5Wk (load combinations 3(c), Table 3.14)
Figure 3.6 illustrates how the factors in table 3-10 and 3-12 can be applied when considering the
stability of the office building shown for overturning about point B. Figure 3-6(a) treats the wind
load ( W k ) as the leading variable action and the live load ( Qk ) on the roof as the accompanying
variable action. Figure 3-6(b) considers the live load as the leading variable action and the wind as
the accompanying variable action.
B B
(a) (b)
Figure 3.6 Wind and imposed load acting on an office building-stability check
Equations 3.3 and 3.4 are based on expression 6.10 in EN 1990. This document also includes two
alternative expressions, namely 6.10a and 6.10b (reproduced as equations 3.5 and 3.6 respectively)
for calculating the design values of actions, use of which may improve structural efficiency,
particularly for heavier structural materials such as concrete.
E d G , jGk , j Q ,1 0,1Qk ,1 Q ,i 0,i Qk ,i (3.5)
j 1 i 1
where
is a reduction factor for unfavourable permanent actions. The value of recommended in the
National Annex to EC 2 is 0.925.
Note that equation 3.5 yields only one estimate of E d (i.e. load combination 3(a) in Table 3.14)
whereas equation 3.6 yields two (i.e. load combinations 3(b) and 3(c) in Table 3.14). For UK building
structures, designers may use the output from either equation 3.3 or 3.4 (depending on the number of
variable actions present) or the more onerous output from equations 3.5 and 3.6.
Use of actions determined via equations 3.3 / 3.4 should lead to designs with comparable levels of
safety to that currently achieved using BS 8110. However, use of equations 3.5 and 3.6 may improve
structural efficiency, as illustrated in example 3.3.
Worked Example 3.4: Design actions for simply supported beam (EN 1990)
A simply supported beam for an office building has a span of 6 m. Calculate the values of the design
bending moments, M E ,d , assuming
(a) the beam supports uniformly distributed permanent and variable actions of 5 kNm 1 and 6
kNm 1 respectively
(b) in addition to the actions described in (a) the beam also supports an independent variable
concentrated load of 20 kN at mid-span.
LOAD CASE A
g k =5KN/m ; q k =6KN/m
L=6m
Since the beam is subjected to only one variable action use equation 3.3 to determine E d where
E d G , jGk , j Q ,1Qk ,1
j 1
LOAD CASE B
Qk =20KN
g k =5KN/m ; q k =6KN/m
L=6m
The extra complication here is that it is not clear if q k or Qk is the leading variable action. This can
only be determined by trial and error. This time use equation 3.4 to evaluate E d , since there are two
independent variable actions are present.
Assuming q k is the leading variable action gives
4.0 Introduction
A reinforced concrete structure is a combination of beams, columns, slabs and walls, rigidly
connected together to form a monolithic frame. Each individual member must be capable of resisting
the forces acting on it, so that the determination of these forces is an essential part of the design
process. The full analysis of a rigid concrete frame is rarely simple; but simplified calculations of
adequate precision can often be made if the basic action of the structure is understood.
There are several methods, of structural analysis, but the common ones are;
i) Moment distribution for manual methods
ii) Computer plain frame programs based on the matrix stiffness method of analysis
iii) Moment coefficients
Since the design of a reinforced concrete member is generally based on the ultimate limit state, the
analysis is usually performed for loadings corresponding to that state.
4.1 Actions
The actions (loads) on a structure are divided into two types: permanent actions, and variable (or
imposed) actions. Permanent action are those which are normally constant during the structures life.
Variable actions, on the other hand, are transient and not constant in magnitude, as for example those
due to wind or to human occupants.
4.1.1 Permanent actions
Permanent actions include the weight of the structure itself and all architectural components such as
exterior cladding, partitions and ceilings. Equipment and static machinery, when permanent fixtures,
are also often considered as part of the permanent actions.
For most reinforced concretes, a typical value for the self-weight is 25KN per cubic metre, but a
higher density should be taken for heavily reinforced or dense concrete. In the case of a building, the
weights of any permanent partitions should be calculated from the architects drawings. A minimum
partition loading equivalent to 1.0KN per square metre is often specified as a variable action, but this
is only adequate for lightweight partitions.
4.1.2 Variable actions
Variable actions are more difficult to determine accurately. For many of them, it is only possible to
make conservative estimates based on standard codes of practice or past experience. Examples of
variable actions are: the weights of its occupants, furniture, or machinery; the pressures of wind, the
weight of snow, and of retained earth or water; and the forces caused by thermal expansion or
shrinkage of the concrete.
Although the wind load is a variable action, it is kept in a separate category when its partial factors
of safety are specified, and when the load combinations on the structure are being considered.
A C
Load combination 2, permanent wind load is used to check the stability of a structure. A load
combination of permanent variable wind load could have the arrangement shown in figure 3.6.
Figure 4-2 shows the patterns of vertical loading on a multi-span continuous beam to cause (i)
maximum design moments in alternate spans and maximum possible hogging moments in adjacent
spans, (ii) maximum design hogging moments at support A, and (iii) the design hogging moment at
support A as specified by the EC2 code for simplicity.
1.35G k + 1.5Q k
1.35G k 1.35G k
A
ii) The concrete cross-section including the transformed area of reinforcement based on the
modular ratio;
iii) The compression area only of the concrete cross-section, plus the transformed area of
reinforcement based on the modular ratio
A structure should be analysed for each of the critical loading conditions which produce the
maximum stresses at any particular section. This procedure will be illustrated in the examples for a
continuous beam and a building frame. For these structures it is conventional to draw the bending-
moment diagram on the tension side of the members.
Sign Conventions
i) For the moment-distribution analysis anti-clockwise support moments are positive as, for example,
in table 4.1 for the fixed end moments (FEM).
ii) For subsequently calculating the moments along the span of a member, moments causing sagging
are positive, while moments causing hogging are negative, as illustrated in figure 4-4.
4.0 m
124.5 KN 27
27
124.5 KN
(b) Shearing Force Diagram
151.5 KNm
54 4 195 4
Maximum bending moment 151.5 KNm
4 8
The analysis is completed by drawing the shearing-force and bending-moment diagrams which
would later be used in the design and detailing of the shear and bending reinforcement.
VAB S.F.D
VBA
MAB M BA
--
-- B.M.D
+ M max a2
a1
a3
where x the distance from support A. Taking the roots of this equation gives
V AB (V AB
2
2wM AB )
x
w
V AB (V AB
2
2wM AB )
so that; a1 (4.5)
w
V AB (V AB
2
2wM AB )
and; a2 L (4.6)
w
G k = 25 KN/m Q k = 10 KN/m
A B C D
6m 4m 6m
Table 4.1 is the moment distribution carried out for the first loading arrangement: simpler
calculations would be required for each of the remaining load cases. It should be noted that the
3I
reduced stiffness of has been used for the end spans.
4L
A B C D
Stiffness (k) 3 I I 3 I
4 L L 4 L
= 3 1 = 0.125 = 1 = 0.125 = 3 1 = 0.125
4 6 4 4 6
Distr. factors 0.125
0.125+0.25
= 1/3 2/3 2/3 1/3
Load (kN) 292 135 292
-292 6 + 135 4 292 6
F.E.M. 0 -- 12 + 0
8 8
0 -219.4 + 45.0 - 45.0 + 219.4 0
Balance +58.1 + 116.3 - 116.3 -58.1
The shearing forces, the maximum span bending moments, and their positions along the beam, can
be calculated using the formulae previously derived. Thus for the first loading arrangement and span
AB, using the sign convention of figure 4-4:
Load ( M AB M BA )
Shear V AB
2 L
292.5 132.5
124.2 KN
2 6 .0
VBA Load VAB
292.5 124.2 168.3 KN
2
V AB
Maximum moment, span AB M AB
2w
where w 292.5 / 6.0 48.75 KN / m. Therefore:
124.2 2
M max 0 158.2 KNm
2 48.75
V
Distance from A, a3 AB
w
124.2
2.55 m
48.75
The bending-moment diagrams for each of the loading arrangements are shown in figure 4-6, and the
corresponding shearing-force diagrams are shown in figure 4-7. The individual bending-moment
diagrams are combined in figure 4-8a to give the bending-moment design envelope. Similarly, figure
4-8b is the shearing-force design envelope. Such envelope diagrams are used in the detailed design
of the beams.
In this example, simple supports with no fixity have been assumed for the end supports at A and D.
Even so, the sections at A and D should be designed for a hogging moment due to a partial fixity
equal to 25 per cent of the maximum moment in the span, that is 158 / 4 39.5 KNm .
133 133
(1) 65
158 158
108 108
11
(2)
103 103
151
100
(3)
151 109
151
100
(4)
109
151
124 168
67.5
(1)
67.5
124
168
83 97.5 119
(2)
119 97.5 83
(3)
85 85
171
171
85
85
(4)
151 151
65
KNm
11
158 158
124 110 171
110 124 KN
171
0.45 F 0.55 F
(b)
Shearing Forces
0.60 F 0.55 F
Type one frames are in buildings where none of the lateral loads such as wind are transmitted to the
columns and beams but are resisted by much more stiffer elements such as shear walls, lift shafts or
stairwells.
Type two frames are designed to resist the lateral loads, which cause bending, shearing and axial
loads in the beams and columns. For both types frames the axial forces in the columns can be
generally be calculated as if the beams and slabs were simply supported.
H2
(1)
H1
H2
(2)
H1
H2
(3)
H1
The substitute frame 1 in figure 4.11 consists of one complete floor beam with its connecting columns
(which are assumed rigidly fixed at their remote ends). An analysis of this frame wil1 give the
bending moments and shearing forces in the beams and columns for the floor level considered.
Substitute frame 2 is a single span combined with its connecting columns and two adjacent spans, all
fixed at their remote ends. This frame may be used to determine the bending moments and shearing
forces in the central beam. Provided that the central span is greater than the two adjacent spans, the
bending moments in the columns can also be found with this frame.
Substitute frame 3 can be used to find the moments in the columns only. It consists of a single
junction, with the remote ends of the members fixed. This type of subframe would be used when the
beams have been analysed as continuous over simple supports.
In frames 2 and 3, the assumption of fixed ends to the outer beams over-estimates their stiffnesses.
These values are, therefore, halved to allow for the flexibility resulting from continuity.
The various critical loading arrangements to produce maximum stresses have to be considered. In
general these loading arrangements for the ultimate limit state as specified by the code are:
(1) Alternate spans loaded with total ultimate load ( 1.35Gk 1.5Qk ) and all other spans loaded with
minimum dead load ( 1.35Gk ); this loading will give maximum span moments and maximum column
moments.
(2) All spans loaded with the total ultimate load ( 1.35Gk 1.5Qk ) to provide the design moment at
the supports.
When considering the critical loading arrangements for a column, it is sometimes necessary to
include the case of maximum moment and minimum possible axial load, in order to investigate the
possibility of tension failure caused by the bending.
J K L M
A B C D 3.5m
4.0m
Beam
600 300
E F G H
350
300
Typical column section
Fig 4.12 Substitute frame
Stiffnesses, k
Beam Columns
0.3 0.6 3 0.3 0.353
I 5.4 10 3 m 4 I 1.07 103 m 4
12 12
Spans AB and CD Upper
5.4 103 1.07 103
k AB k CD 0.9 103 kU 0.31 103
6.0 3.5
Span BC Lower
5.4 103 1.07 103
k BC 1.35 103 kL 0.27 103
4.0 4 .0
kU k L (0.31 0.27)103 0.58103
Distribution factors
Joints A and D
k 0.9 0.58 1.48
0.9
D.F. AB D.F .DC 0.61
1.48
0.58
D.F. cols 0.39
1.48
Joints B and C
k 0.9 1.35 0.58 2.83
0.9
D.F. BA D.F .CD 0.32
2.83
1.35
D.F. BC D.F .CB 0.48
2.83
0.58
D.F. cols 0.20
2.83
The critical loading arrangements for the ultimate limit state are identical to those for the continuous
beam in example 4.2, and they are illustrated in figure 4.5. The moment distribution for the first
loading arrangement is shown in table 4.2. In the table, the distribution for each upper and lower
column have been combined, since this simplifies the layout for the calculations.
Table 4.2 Moment distribution for the first loading case
A B C D
Cols. AB BA Cols. BC CB Cols. CD DC Cols.
( M) ( M) ( M) ( M)
D.F.s 0.39 0.61 0.32 0.20 0.48 0.48 0.20 0.32 0.61 0.39
Load kN 292 135 292
Bal. 56.9 89.1 32.3 20.2 48.5 48.5 20.2 32.3 89.1 56.9
Bal. 6.3 9.9 22.0 13.8 33.0 33.0 13.5 22.0 9.9 6.3
Bal. 4.3 6.7 6.9 4.3 10.3 10.3 4.3 6.9 6.7 4.3
Bal. 1.3 2.1 2.8 1.7 4.1 4.1 1.7 2.8 2.1 1.3
M (kN m) 68.8 68.8 135.0 40.0 95.0 95.0 40.0 135.0 68.8 68.8
The shearing forces and the maximum span moments can be calculated from the formulae of section
For the first loading arrangement and span AB:
load ( M AB M BA )
Shear V AB
2 L
292.5 (68.8 135.0)
135KN
2 6.0
VBA load VAB
292.5 135 157KN
2
V AB
Maximum moments, span AB M AB
2w
1352
68.8 118KNm
2 48.75
V 135
Distance from A, a3 AB 2 .8m
w 48.75
Figure 4.13 shows the bending moments in the beams for each loading arrangement; figure 4.14
shows the shearing forces. These diagrams have been combined in figure 4.15 to give the design
envelopes for bending moments and shearing forces.
The moment in each column is given by
k
M col M col col
k col
Thus, for the first loading arrangement and taking M col from table 4.2 gives
0.31
Column moment M AJ 68.8 37 kNm
0.58
0.27
M AE 68.8 32 kNm
0.58
0.31
M BK 40 21kNm
0.58
0.27
M BF 40 19 kNm
0.58
This loading arrangement gives the maximum column moments, as plotted in figure 4.16.
135 157
135 135
69 95 95 69
67.5
28
(1) (1)
67.5
(2) (2)
10
97.5 91
77 77
147 133 111
115 102 111
106
67 80
46
(3) (3)
1
79 89 92
114
160 160
147
102 115
80 67 92 89
46
(4) (4)
1
79 106
114 111
133
Fig 4.13 Beam bending moment diagrams (kNm) Fig.4.14 Beam shearing-force diagrams (kN)
147 147
69 115 115 69
28
kN m
10
118 118
37 21 21 37
160 32 32
135 19 19
106
kN
106
135
160
Fig 4.15 Bending-moment and shearing-force envelopes Fig.4.16 Column bending moments (kNm)
3.5m
1.35G k + 1.5 Q k
1.35G k
= 292.5kN = 135kN
A B C
4.0m
6.0m 4.0m
6
Fixed-end moment M BA 292.5 146 kNm
25
4
Fixed-end moment M BC 135 45 kNm
25 18
16 kNm
Column moments are
0.31
Upper column M U (146 45) 18 kNm
1.705
0.27
Lower column M L (146 45) 16 kNm
1.705
Fig 4.18 Column moments
The column moments are illustrated in figure 4.18. They should be compared with the
corresponding moments for the internal column in figure 4.16.
3.5
10.5kN 4 th
3.5
lateral load= 3.0kN/m
10.5kN 3 rd
3.5
11.25kN 2 nd
4.0
12.0kN 1 st
4.0
6.0kN
CL
s
H1= 0.93 H2= 1.70 H3= 1.70 H4= 0.93
N1= 4.0P N2= 1.0P N3= 1.0P N4= 4.0P
= 0.54 = 0.135 = 0.135 = 0.54
(a) Roof
t t'
2.78 5.1 5.1 2.78
2.70 0.68 0.68 2.70
(b) 4th floor
Fig 4.20 Subframes at the roof and 4th floor
Thus
Axial force in exterior column: axial force in interior column 4.0P : 1.0P
The analysis of the frame continues by considering a section through the top-storey columns: the
removal of the frame below this section gives the remainder shown in figure 4.20a. The forces in this
subframe are calculated as follows.
(a) Axial Forces in the Columns
Taking moments about point s, M s 0 , therefore
5.251.75 P 6.0 P 10.0 4P 16.0 0
and therefore P 0.135 kN
thus
N1 N 4 4.0P 0.54kN
N 2 N3 1.0P 0.135kN
(b) Vertical Shearing Forces F in the Beams
For each part of the subframe, F 0 , therefore
F1 N1 0.54kN
F2 N1 N 2 0.675kN
79
114
(a) Original Moments (kNm)
79
118
(b) Redistributed Moments (kNm)
134
105 111
90 92
158.5
(c) Shears (kN)
Figure 4.22a duplicates the original bending-moment diagram (part 3 of figure 4.13) of example 4.3
while figure 4.22b shows the redistributed moments, with the span moment set at 118 kN m. The
moment at support B can be calculated, using a rearrangement of equations 4.4 and 4.1 . Thus
V AB [( M max M AB )2 w]
and
wL
M BA VAB L M AB
2
For span AB, w 48.75kN/m , therefore
VAB [(118 67) 2 48.75] 134kN
48.75 6.0
M BA 134 6.0 67 140kNm
2
and
VBA 292.5 134 158.5kN
Reduction in M BA 147 140
7 kNm
7 100
4.8 per cent
147
In order to ensure that the moments in the columns at joint B are not changed by the distribution,
moment M BC must also be reduced by 7 kN m. Therefore
M BC 115 7 108kNm hogging
For the revised moments in BC:
(108 80) 195
VBC 105kN
4 2
VCB 195 105 90kN
For span BC:
1052
M max 108 5kNm sagging
2 48.75
Figure 4.22c shows the revised shearing-force diagram to accord with the redistributed moments.
This example illustrates how, with redistribution
1. the moments at a section of beam can be reduced without exceeding the maximum design moments
at other sections;
2. the values of the column moments are not affected ; and
3. the equilibrium between external loads and internal forces is maintained.
c2 cu2
0.0020 0.0035
Strain
Fig.5-1 Parabolic-rectangular stress-strain diagram for concrete in compression
5.1.2 Reinforcing steel
The representative short-term design stress-strain curve for reinforcement is given in figure 5.2. the
behaviour of the steel identical in tension and compression, being linear in the elastic range up to the
design yield stress of f yk / s where f yk is the characteristic yield stress and s is the partial factor
of safety.
f yk
S
Tension and
2
compression
Stress N/mm
2
200 KN/mm
Strain
Within the elastic range, the relationship between the stress and strain is
Stress elastic modulus strain
Es s (5-1)
f yk
so that the design yield strain is y / E s
s
at the ultimate limit for f yk 500 N / mm 2
y 500 /(1.15 200 103 )
0.00217
d' s=0.8x
A's sc x
neutral
d axis
As
Figure 5.3 shows the cross-section of a member subjected to bending, and the resultant strain
diagram, together with three different types of stress distribution in the concrete:
1. The triangular stress distribution applies when the stresses are very nearly proportional to the
strains, which generally occurs at the loading levels encountered under working conditions and is,
therefore, used at the serviceability limit state.
2. The rectangular-parabolic stress block represents the distribution at failure when the compressive
strains are within the plastic range, and it is associated with the design for the ultimate state.
3. The equivalent rectangular stress block is a simplified alternative to the rectangular-parabolic
distribution.
where b beam width
d effective depth of the beam
d depth of the compression steel
As Area of tension steel
As Area of compression steel
At the ultimate limit state it is important that member sections in flexure should be ductile and that
failure should occur with the gradual yielding of the tension steel and not by a sudden catastrophic
compression failure of the concrete. Also, yielding of the reinforcement enables the formation of
plastic hinges so that redistribution of maximum moments can occur, resulting in a safer and more
economical structure. To ensure rotation of the plastic hinges with sufficient yielding of the tension
steel and also to allow for other factors such as the strain hardening of the steel, EC2 limits the depth
of neutral axis to
x 0.45d for concrete class 50 / 60 .
This is the limiting maximum value for x given by EC2 with no redistribution applied to the moments
calculated by an elastic analysis of the structure. When moment redistribution is applied these
maximum values of x are reduced.
s/2
x s=0.8x
neutral Fcc
d axis z
As
st Fst
5.4 Singly reinforced rectangular section in bending at the ultimate limit state
5.4.1 Design equations for bending
Bending of the section will induce a resultant tensile force Fst in the reinforcing steel, and a resultant
compressive force in the concrete Fcc which acts through the centroid of the effective area of concrete
in compression, as shown in figure 5-4.
For equilibrium, the ultimate design moment, M, must be balanced by the moment of resistance of
the section so that
M Fcc z Fst z (5.5)
where z the lever arm between the resultant forces Fcc and Fst
Fcc stress area of action
0.567 f ck bs
and
z d s/2 (5.6)
so that substituting in equation 5.5
M 0.567 f ck bs z
and replacing s from equation 5.6 gives
M 1.134 f ck b(d z ) z (5.7)
Md
And; 0.167 K bal
f ck bd 2
Md
When the design moment M d is such that K bal 0.167 then the section cannot be singly
f ck bd 2
reinforced and compression reinforcing steel is required in the compression zone of the section.
M
K
bd 2 f ck
d=440
185 106
0.147 0.167
260 4402 25 As
therefore compression steel is not required.
Lever arm:
K
z d 0.5 0.25 Fig.5-5 Design example-singly
1.134
reinforced section
0.147
4400.5 0.25
1.134
373mm
Area of tension reinforcement:
M
As
0.87 f yk z
185 106
0.87 500 373
1140mm 2
And; x s / 0.8
Therefore the moment of resistance of the section is
M Fst z
0.87 f yk As (d s / 2)
0.87 f yk As
0.87 f yk As d (5.12)
1.134 f ck b
These equations assume the tension reinforcement has yielded, which will be the case if
x 0.617d .
x s
neutral Fcc
d=520
axis z
2
A s =1470mm
Fst
Fig.5-6 Analysis example singly reinforced section
d' Fsc
A's sc x=0.45d s=0.8x
neutral Fcc
d axis
Z bal
As
st Fst
From the section dealing with the analysis of a singly reinforced section and for concrete class not
greater than C50/60 when M 0.167 f ck bd 2 the design moment exceeds the moment of resistance
of the concrete ( M bal ) and therefore compression reinforcement is required. For this condition the
depth of neutral axis, x 0.45d , the maximum value allowed by the code in order to endure a tension
failure with a ductile section. Therefore
z bal d s bal / 2 d 0.8 x bal / 2
d 0.8 0.45d / 2
0.82d
For equilibrium of the section in figure 5-7
Fst Fcc Fsc
so that with the reinforcement at yield
0.87 f yk As 0.567 f ck bs 0.87 f yk As
or with
s 0.8 0.45d 0.36d
0.87 f yk As 0.204 f ck bd 0.87 f yk As (5.13)
and taking moments about the centroid of the tension steel,
M Fcc zbal Fsc (d d )
0.204 f ck bd 0.82d 0.87 f yk As (d d )
0.167 f ck bd 2 0.87 f yk As (d d ) (5.14)
From equation 5.14
M 0.167 f ck bd 2
As (5.15)
0.87 f yk (d d )
Multiplying both sides of equation 5.13 by z 0.82d and rearranging gives
0.167 f ck bd 2
As As (5.16)
0.87 f yk z bal
with z bal 0.82d .
Hence the areas of compression steel, As , and tension steel, As , can be calculated from equations
5.15 and 5.16.
Substituting K bal 0.167 and K M / bd 2 f ck into these equations would convert them into:
( K K bal ) f ck bd 2
As (5.17)
0.87 f yk (d d )
K bal f ck bd 2
As As (5.18)
0.87 f yk z bal
In this analysis it has been assumed that the compression steel has yielded so that the steel stress
f sc 0.87 f yk . From the proportions of the strain distribution diagram:
sc 0.0035
(5.19)
x d x
so that
x d sc
x 0.0035
or
d sc
1
x 0.0035
At yield with f yk 500 N / mm 2 , the steel strain sc y 0.00217. Therefore for yielding of the
compression steel
d 0.00217
1 0.38 (5.20)
x 0.0035
or with x 0.45d
d
0.171 (5.21)
d
The ratio of d / d for yielding of other grades of steel can be determined by using their yield strain
in equation 5.19, but for values of f yk less than 500 N / mm 2 , the application of equation 5.21 will
provide an adequate safe check.
If d / d 0.171, then it is necessary to calculate the strain sc from equation 5.19 and then determine
f sc E s sc
f sc from
200000 sc
This value of stress for the compressive steel must then be used in the denominator of equation 5.15
in place of 0.87 f yk in order to calculate the area As of compression steel. The area of tension steel
is calculated from a modified equation 5.16 such that
0.167 f ck bd 2 f sc
As As
0.87 f yk z bal 0.87 f yk
The above equations apply for the case where the concrete class is less than or equal to C50/60. The
constants for concretes up to class C50/60 are tabulated in table 5.1.
Compression steel:
( K K bal ) f ck bd 2
As
0.87 f yk (d d )
(0.226 0.167)25 260 4402
0.87 500(440 50)
438 mm 2
Tension steel:
K bal f ck bd 2
As As
0.87 f yk z bal
0.167 25 260 4402
438
0.87 500(0.82 440)
1339 438 1777 mm 2
As =2410
Fst
Section Stress block
Fig.5.9 Analysis example, doubly reinforced section
case where compression steel is required; if it should be required, the design would be based on the
principles derived in section Flanged section with compression reinforcement.
For the singly reinforced section it is necessary to consider two conditions:
1.the stress block lies within the compression flange, and
2.the stress block extends below the flange.
5.6.1 Flanged section- the depth of the stress block lies within the flange, s h f
bf 0.567f ck
x s/2
hf neutral axis s=0.8x
Fcc
d z
As
Fst
bw
Section Stress block
b f =800 0.567f ck
s/2
h f =150 neutral axis
x s
Fcc
d=420
As =1470mm2
Fst
Section Stress block
Assume initially that the stress block depth lies within the flange and the reinforcement is strained to
the yield, so that f st 0.87 f yk .
For equilibrium of the section
Fcc Fst
Therefore; 0.567 f ck b f s 0.87 f yk As
and solving for the depth of stress block
0.87 5001470
s
0.567 25 800
56 mm h f 150mm
x s / 0.8 56 / 0.8 70 mm
Hence the stress block does lie within the flange and with this depth of neutral axis the steel will have
yielded as assumed.
Lever arm:
z d s/2
420 56 / 2
392 mm
Taking moments about the centroid of the reinforcement the moment of resistance is
M Fcc z
0.567 f ck b f sz
0.567 25 800 56 392106
249 KNm
s hf
5.6.2 Flanged section- the depth of the stress block extends below the flange,
For the design of a flanged section, the procedure described in section above (Flanged section- the
depth of the stress block lies within the flange, s h f ) will check if the depth of the stress block
extends below the flange. An alternative procedure is to calculate the moment of resistance, M f , of
the section with s h f , the depth of the flange(see equation 5.22 of example 5.6 following). Hence
if the design moment, M d , is such that
Md M f
then the stress block must extend below the flange, and
s hf
In this case the design can be carried out by either:
(a) using an exact method to determine the depth of the neutral axis, as in example 5.6 or
(b) designing for the conservative condition of x 0.45d , which is the maximum value of x for a
singly reinforced section and concrete class C50 / 60.
Worked Example 5.6: Design of a flanged section with the depth of the stress block below the
flange
The T-section beam shown in figure 5.12 is required to resist an ultimate design moment of 180KNm.
The characteristic material strengths are f yk 500 N / mm 2 and f ck 25 N / mm 2 .
Calculate the area of reinforcement required.
bf =400
0.567fck
Fcf
hf =100 x s
neutral sw
d =350
axis
Fcw z1
z2
As
Fst
bw =200
Therefore
610103
As
0.87 500
1402mm 2
Fcf
hf =150
s=0.8x
neutral
Fcw
d =550
axis
As =2592
Fst
b w=300
With this depth of neutral axis the reinforcement has yielded, as assumed, and
Fcw 4.25(190 150) 170 KN
(If Fcf Fst , the stress block would not extend beyond the flange and the section would be analysed
as in example 5.2 for a rectangular section of dimensions b f d .)
Taking moments about the centroid of the reinforcement
M Fcf (d h f / 2) Fcw (d s / 2 h f / 2)
957(550 150 / 2) 170(550 190 / 2 150 / 2) 103
519 KNm
Worked Example 5.8: Design of a flanged section with depth of neutral axis x 0.45d
A safe but conservative design for a flanged section with s h f can be achieved by setting the depth
of neutral axis to x 0.45d , the maximum depth allowed in the code. Design equations can be
derived for this condition as follows.
bf 0.567f ck
Fc2
hf 2 2 s=0.8x
1 x=0.45d
neutral Fc1
axis z1 z2
As
Fst
bw
Section Stress block
Fig.5-14 Flanged section with depth of neutral axis x 0.45d
M bal b bw h f
hf
1 1
0.167 w 0.567 (5.25)
2 b 2d
f ck b f d bf d f
If the applied design moment, M M bal , compression reinforcement is required. In this case the area
of compression steel can be calculated from
M M bal
As (5.26)
0.87 f yk (d d )
and considering the equilibrium of forces on the section
Fst Fc1 Fc 2 Fsc
so that the area of tension steel is
0.2 f ck bw d 0.567 f ck h f (b f bw )
As As (5.27)
0.87 f yk
Again, d / x 0.38 , otherwise the design compressive steel stress is less than 0.87 f yk .
x bal
( k1 ) / k 2 (5.28)
d
where
moment at section after redistribution
1.0
moment at section before redistribution
k1 and k 2 are constants from the EC2 code
x bal is the maximum value of the depth of the neutral axis which will take the limiting value of the
equality of equation 5.28 but should be less than 0.45d for class C50 / 60.
The depth of the stress block is
s bal 0.8 x bal
and the lever arm is
z bal d s bal / 2 (5.29)
The moment of resistance of the concrete in compression is
M bal Fcc z bal 0.567 f ck bsbal z bal
and
K bal M bal / bd 2 f ck 0.567sbal z bal / d 2
This equation for K bal and the previous equations from 5.28to 5.29 can be arranged to give
K bal 0.454( k1 ) / k 2 0.182( k1 ) / k 2
2
(5.30)
or alternatively
x z
K bal 0.454 bal bal
d d
From the EC2 the constants k1 and k 2 are given as: k1 0.44 and k 2 1.25 .
The relevant values of x bal , z bal and K bal for varying percentages of moment redistribution and
concrete class C50 / 60 are shown in table 5-2.
( K K bal ) f ck bd 2
As (5.31)
0.87 f yk (d d )
K bal f ck bd 2
And; As As (5.32)
0.87 f yk z bal
M bal
where K (5.33)
bd 2 f ck
If the value of d / d for the section exceeds that shown in table 5.2, the compression steel will not
have yielded and the compressive stress will be less than 0.87 f yk . In such cases, the compressive
stress f sc will be E s sc where the strain sc is obtained from the proportions of the strain diagram.
This value of f sc should replace 0.87 f yk in equation 5.31, and equation 5.32 becomes
K bal f ck bd 2 f sc
As As
0.87 f yk z bal 0.87 f yk
It should be noted that for a singly reinforced section ( K K bal ), the lever arm is calculated from
equation 5.8.
For a section requiring compression steel, the lever arm can be calculated from equation 5.29 or by
using the equation
z d 0.5 (0.25 K bal / 1.134) (5.34)
which is similar to equation 5.8 but with K bal replacing K .
Worked Example 5.9: Design of a section with moment redistribution applied and 0.8
The section shown in figure 5.15 is subject to an ultimate design moment of 230 KNm after a 20%
reduction due to moment redistribution. The characteristic material strengths are f yk 500 N / mm 2
and f ck 25 N / mm 2 . Determine the areas of reinforcement required using the constants k1 and k 2 .
Compression steel:
M M bal
As
0.87 f yk (d d )
(230 181) 106
0.87 500(490 50)
256 mm 2
Tension steel:
M bal
As As
0.87 f yk z bal
181 106
256
0.87 500 434
959 256 1215 mm 2
X Y
b
z
zco
s
compression Fc
n n
sio sio
tension
VEd
z = 0.9d
e s e s
d pr mp
r
om
tension
tension
c co VEd / sin
tension Fs
zcot Section
X Y
VEd
Fig.6-2 Assumed truss for the variable strut inclination method
The analysis of the truss to derive the design equation will be carried out in the following order:
1. Consideration of the compressive strength of the diagonal concrete strut and its angle ;
2. Calculation of the required shear reinforcement Asw / s for the vertical ties;
3. Calculation of the additional tension steel As1 required in the bottom chord member.
The following notation is used in the equations for the shear design
Asw the cross-sectional area of the two legs of the link
s the spacing of the links
z the lever arm between the upper and lower chord members of the analogous truss
f ywd the design yield strength of the link reinforcement
f yk the characteristic strength of the link reinforcement
V Ed the shear force due to the actions at the ultimate limit state
VEf the ultimate shear force at the face of the support
Vwd the shear force in the link
VRd ,s the shear resistance of the links
VRd ,max the maximum design value of the shear which can be resisted by the concrete strut
maximum design shear force VRd ,max is limited by the ultimate crushing strength of the diagonal
concrete member in the analogous truss and its vertical component.
With reference to figure 6.2, the effective cross sectional area of concrete acting as the diagonal strut
is taken as bw z cos and the design concrete stress f cd f ck / 1.5 .
The ultimate strength of the strut ultimate design stress cross-sectional area
( f ck / 1.5) (bw z cos )
and its vertical component [( f ck / 1.5) (bw z cos )] sin
so that VRd ,max f ck bw z cos sin / 1.5
which by conversion of the trigometrical functions can be expressed as
f ck bw z
VRd ,max
1.5(cot tan )
In EC2 this equation is modified by the inclusion of a strength reduction factor ( v1 ) for concrete
cracked in shear.
f ck bw zv1
VRd ,max (6.3)
1.5(cot tan )
where the strength reduction factor takes the value of v1 0.6(1 f ck / 250) and, putting z 0.9d ,
equation 6.3 becomes
0.9d bw 0.6(1 f ck / 250) f ck
VRd ,max
1.5(cot tan )
0.36bw d (1 f ck / 250) f ck
(6.4)
(cot tan )
and to ensure that there is no crushing of the diagonal compressive strut:
VRd ,max VEd (6.5)
This must be checked for the maximum value of shear on the beam, which is usually taken as the
shear force, VEf , at face of the beams supports so that
VRd ,max VEf
EC2 limits to a value between 22 and 45 degrees.
The angle increases with the magnitude of the maximum shear force on the beam and hence the
compressive forces in the diagonal concrete members. It is set by EC2 to have a value 22 and 45
degrees. For most cases of predominately uniformly distributed loading the angle will be 22
degrees but for heavy and concentrated loads it can be higher in order to resist crushing of the
concrete diagonal members.
(i) With 22 degrees (this is the usual case for uniformly distributed loads)
From equation 6.4:
VRd ,max(22) 0.124bw d (1 f ck / 250) f ck (6.6)
If VRd ,max(22) VEf then a larger value of the angle must be used so that the diagonal concrete strut
has a larger vertical component to balance V Ed .
(ii) With 45 degrees (the maximum value of as allowed by EC2)
From equation 6.4:
thus rearranging
Asw VEd
(6.9)
s 0.78df yk cot
EC2 specifies a minimum value for Asw / s such that
Asw,min 0.08 f ck0.5bw
(6.10)
s f yk
Equation 6.9 can be used to determine the amount and spacing of the shear links and will depend on
the value of used in the design. For most cases of beams with predominately uniformly distributed
loads the angle will be 22 degrees with cot 2.5 . Otherwise the value for can be calculated
from equation 6.8.
EC2 also specifies that, for beams with predominately uniformly distributed loads, the design shear
force VEd need not be checked at a distance d from the face of the support but the shear reinforcement
calculated must be continued to the support.
Equation 6.9 can be rearranged to give the shear resistance VRd ,s of a given arrangement of links
Asw / s .
Thus:
Asw
VRd ,s 0.78df yk cot (6.11)
s
Anchorage
length
X
com
p
X
s
s=0.9d(cot + cot )
From the geometry of part (a) of figure 6.3, the spacing of the bent-up bars is:
s 0.9d (cot cot )
and at the section X-X the shear resistance of a single bent-up bar ( V wd ) must equal the shear force
( V Ed ).
f yk
Vwd VEd f ywd Asw sin Asw sin 0.87 f yk Asw sin
1.15
where Asw is the cross-sectional area of the bent-up bar.
For a multiple system of bent-up bars, as in part (b) of figure 6.3, the shear resistance is increased
proportionately to the spacing, s. Hence:
0.9d (cot cot )
VEd 0.87 f yk Asw sin
s
0.9d (cot cot )
= number of bars crossing the crack
s
or
Asw VEd
(6.13)
s 0.78df yk (cot cot ) sin
This equation is analogous to equation (6.9) for the resistance of shear links. In a similar way it can
be shown that, based on crushing of the concrete in the compressive struts, the analogous equation
to (6.4) is given by:
(cot cot )
VRd ,max 0.36bw d (1 f ck / 250) f ck (6.14)
(1 cot2 )
and the additional tensile force to be provided by the provision of additional tension steel is given by
a modified version of equation 6.12:
Ftd 0.5VEd (cot cot ) (6.15)
EC2 also requires that
i) the maximum longitudinal spacing of bent-up bars limited to 0.6(1 cot ) ;
ii) at least 50 per cent of the required shear reinforcement should be in the form of shear links.
Good bond conditions are considered to be when (a) bars are inclined at an angle of between 45 and
90 to the horizontal or (b) zero to 45 provided that in this second case additional requirements are
met. These additional conditions are that bars are
1. either placed in members whose depth in the direction of concreting does not exceed 250mm or
2. embedded in members with a depth greater than 250mm and are either in the lower 250mm of the
member or at least 300mm from the top surface when the depth exceeds 600mm.
These conditions are illustrated in figure 6.5. When bond conditions are poor then the specified
ultimate bond stresses should be reduced by a factor 0.7.
The design value of the ultimate bond stress is also dependent on the bar size. For all bar size ( )
greater than 32mm the bond stress should additionally be multiplied by a factor (132 ) / 100 .
Table 6.1 gives the design values of ultimate bond stresses for good conditions. These depend on
the class of concrete and are obtained from the equation f bd 1.5 f ctk where f ctk is the characteristic
tensile strength of the concrete.
where As ,req , As. prov area of reinforcement required and provided at that section
1 , 2 coefficients as given in Table 6.2
In Table 6.2:
c d concrete cover coefficients as shown in figure 6.6.
c1 a c a
c c
d=650
H12
Section
2
2H25: As =982mm
Fig.6.7 Beam with stirrups
1. Check the crushing strength VRd ,max of the concrete diagonal strut at the face of the beams support.
From equation 6.6 with 22
VRd ,max(22) 0.124bw d (1 f ck / 250) f ck
0.124 350 650(1 30 / 250)30
745KN ( VEf 770KN )
From equation 6.7 with 45
VRd ,max(45) 0.18bw d (1 f ck / 250) f ck
0.18 350 650(1 30 / 250)30
1081KN ( VEf 770KN )
Therefore: 22 45 .
2. Determine angle
From equation 6.8(a)
VEf
0.5 sin 1 45
0.18bw d (1 f ck / 250) f ck
or alternatively from equation 6.8(b)
VEf 1 770
0.5 sin 1 0.5 sin 22.7
VRd ,max(45) 1081
From which cot 2.39 and tan 0.42 .
Asw 2 113
1.29
s 175
From equation 6.11 the shear resistance, VRd ,s of the links is given by
Asw
VRd ,s 0.78df yk cot
s
1.29 0.78 650 500 2.39 103 781KN
Therefore shear resistance of links 781KN .
Design shear, V Ed distance d from the face of the support 640KN ( 781KN ) . Therefore, the beam
can support, in shear, the ultimate load of 200KN / m .
Table 7.4 Minimum dimensions and axis distance for RC beams for fire resistance
Standard fire Minimum dimensions (mm)
resistance Possible combinations of a and bmin where a is the average axis distance
and bmin is the width of the beam
Simply supported Continuous
A B C D E F G H
R60 bmin 120 160 200 300 120 200
a 40 35 30 25 25 12
R90 bmin 150 200 300 400 150 250
a 55 45 40 35 35 25
R120 bmin 200 240 300 500 200 300 450 500
a 65 60 55 50 45 35 35 30
R240 bmin 280 350 500 700 280 500 650 700
a 90 80 75 70 75 60 60 50
Note: The axis distance a sd from the side of a beam to the corner bar should be a 10mm except
where bmin is greater than the values in columns C and F
The strength of a beam is affected considerably more by its depth than its breadth. The span-depth
ratios usually vary between say 14 and 30 but for larger spans the ratios can be greater. A suitable
breadth may be one-third to one-half of the depth; but it may be much less for a deep beam. At other
times wide shallow beams are used to conserve headroom. The beam should not be too narrow; if it
is much less than 200mm wide there may be difficulty in providing adequate side cover and space
for the reinforcing bars.
Suitable dimensions for b and d can be decided by a few trial calculations as follow:
b where t estimated distance from the outside of the link to the centre
of the tension bars ( see figure 7.1). For example, with nominal sized
12mm links and one layer of 32mm tension bars, t 28 , mm
h d approximately. It will, in fact, be slightly larger than this with
deformed bars as they have a larger overall dimension than the
t cover
nominal bar size.
Table 7.5 shows basic span/depth ratio for commonly occurring reinforced concrete members and
support conditions. They have been obtained using equations 7.1 and 7.2.
l 0 0
3/ 2
l 0 1
1/ 2
K 11 1.5 f ck f ck if 0 (7.2)
d 12 0
where
l / d is the limiting span/depth ratio
K is the factor to take into account the different structural systems, given in Table 7.5
0 f ck 103
is the required tension reinforcement ratio
is the required compression reinforcement ratio
The values in Table 7.5 assume the steel stress at the critical section, s , is 310 N mm 2 ,
corresponding roughly to the stress under characteristic load when f yk 500 Nmm 2 . Where other
steel stresses are used, the values in the table can be multiplied by 310 / s . It will normally be
conservative to assume that
310 f yk As ,req
s (7.3)
500As , prov
where
As ,req is the area of steel required
As, prov is the area of steels provided
l 0 1
1/ 2
0.005 1 0
1/ 2
K 11 1.5 f ck f ck
1.511 1.5 25 25
d 12 0
0.007 0 12 0.005
1.5 16.357 24.5
To avoid damage to finishes for span greater than 7m:
7
Modified ratio 24.5 17.15
10
c) Bar areas
Table 7.7 Sectional areas of groups of bars ( mm 2 )
Bar size Number of bars
(mm) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6 28.3 56.6 84.9 113 142 170 198 226 255 283
8 50.3 101 151 201 252 302 352 402 453 503
10 78.5 157 236 314 393 471 550 628 707 785
12 113 226 339 452 566 679 792 905 1020 1130
16 201 402 603 804 1010 1210 1410 1610 1810 2010
20 314 628 943 1260 1570 1890 2200 2510 2830 3140
25 491 982 1470 1960 2450 2950 3440 3930 4420 4910
32 804 1610 2410 3220 4020 4830 5630 6430 7240 8040
40 1260 2510 3770 5030 6280 7540 8800 10100 11300 12600
s/2
x s=0.8x
neutral Fcc
d axis z
As
st Fst
Worked Example 7.3: Design of tension reinforcement for a rectangular sections, no moment
redistribution
The beam section shown in figure 7.5 has characteristic material strengths of f ck 25N / mm 2 for the
concrete and f yk 500N / mm 2 for the steel. The design moment at the ultimate limit state is
165KNm which causes sagging of the beam.
b=230
M 165 10 6
1. K 0.12
bd f ck 230 4902 25
2
This is less than K bal 0.167 therefore compression steel is not required.
d=490
h=550
2. From the lever-arm equation
z d 0.5 (0.25 K / 1.134)
490 0.5 (0.25 0.12 / 1.134) 431mm As 3-H20
M 165 106
3. As 880mm 2 Fig.7.5 Singly reinforced beam
0.87 f yk z 0.87 500 431
4. Provide three H20 bars, area 943mm 2 .
100As 100 943
5. For the steel provided 0.84 ( 0.13%)
bd 230 490
100As 100 943
And; 0.75 ( 4.0%)
bh 230 550
therefore the steel percentage is within the limits specified by the code.
d' s=0.8x
A's sc x
neutral
d axis
As
st Fst
Equivalent
rectangular
Section Strain Stress block
Fig. 7.6 Beam doubly reinforced to resist a sagging moment
In order to have a ductile section so avoiding a sudden compressive failure of the concrete it is
generally required that the maximum depth of the neutral axis is xbal 0.45d and this is the value
used in the design of a section with compression steel.
f sc 0.87 f yk
From equation 7.6 A's
( M K bal f ck bd )
2
d ' =50
Compression steel As
f sc (d d )
( M 0.167 f ck bd 2 )
Fig.7.7 Beam doubly reinforced
0.87 f yk (d d )
(165 106 0.167 25 230 3302 )
496mm 2
0.87 500(330 50)
Provide two H20 bars for As , area 628mm 2 , bottom steel.
3. From equation 7.7
K bal f ck bd 2 f sc
Tension steel As As
0.87 f yk z 0.87 f yk
0.167 f ck bd 2
As
0.87 f yk z
0.167 25 230 3302
496
0.87 500 0.82 330
888 496 1384mm 2
Provide three H25 bars for As , area 1470mm 2 , top steel.
4. Check equation 7.8 for the areas of steel required and provided for the compression and tension
reinforcement to ensure ductility of the section
( As, prov As,req ) ( As, prov As ,req )
That is
628 496( 132) 1470 1384( 86)mm 2
5. The bar areas provided are within the upper and lower limits specified by the code. To restrain the
compression steel, at least 8mm links at 300mm centres should be provided.
7.3.2 Rectangular sections with tension and compression reinforcement with moment
redistribution applied (based on the UK Annex to EC2)
The steps in the design are:
1. Calculate x bal ( 0.4)d
2. Calculate K M / bd 2 f ck
3. Take K bal from table 5.2 or alternatively calculate
K bal 0.454( 0.4) 0.182( 0.4) 2 for C50
If K K bal , compression steel is required.
4. Calculate the area of compression steel from
( K K bal ) f ck bd 2
As
f sc (d d )
where f sc is the stress in the compression steel
Worked Example 7.5: Design of tension and compression reinforcement, with 20 per cent
moment redistribution, 0.8 (based on the UK Annex to EC2)
The beam section shown in figure 7.8 has characteristic material strengths of f ck 25N / mm 2 and
f yk 500N / mm 2 . The ultimate moment is 370KNm, causing hogging of the beam.
b=300
st
As sc
d=540
neutral
A's axis
x=216
d '=100
0.0035
Section Strain
Fig.7.8 Beam doubly reinforced to resist a hogging moment
1. As the moment reduction factor 0.8 , the limiting depth of the neutral axis is
x ( 0.4)d
(0.8 0.4) 540 216mm
2. K M / bd 2 f ck 370106 /(300 5402 25) 0.169
3. K bal 0.454( 0.4) 0.182( 0.4) 2
0.454(0.8 0.4) 0.182(0.8 0.4) 2 0.152
K K bal therefore compression steel is required.
4. d / x 100/ 216 0.46 0.38
therefore f sc 0.87 f yk
From the proportions of the strain diagram
0.0035( x d )
Steel compressive strain sc
x
0.0035(216 100)
0.00188
216
Steel compressive stress E s sc
200000 0.00188 376N / mm 2
( K K bal ) f ck bd 2
Compression steel As
f sc (d d )
(0.169 0.152)25 300 5402
224 mm 2
376(540 100)
Provide two H20 bars for As , area 628mm 2 , bottom steel.
5. Tension steel
K f bd 2 f sc
As bal ck As
0.87 f yk z 0.87 f yk
where
z d 0.8x / 2 540 0.8 216/ 2 454mm
therefore
0.152 25 300 5402 376
As 224
0.87 500 454 0.87 500
1683 194 1877mm 2
beff beff
As As
hf
d h
Transverse steel in flange
beff 1 bw beff 2 bw
Section Section
Fig 7.9 T-beam and L-beam
At intermediate supports of continuous beams where hogging moments occur the total area of tension
reinforcement should be spread over the effective width of the flange as shown in figure 7.9.
The effective flange width beff is specified by the following equation:
beff bw beff, i
where
beff, i 0.2bi 0.1l0 0.2l0 and also beff, i bi
2bi is the clear distance between the webs of adjacent beams
l0 is the distance between the points of contraflexure along the beam as shown in figure 7.10.
So that for the interior span of a symmetrical T-beam with b1 b2 b and l0 0.7l
beff bw 2[0.2b 0.07l ] bw 2[0.14l ]
For sagging moments the flanges act as a large compressive area. Therefore the stress block for the
flanged beam section usually falls within the flange thickness. For this position of the stress block,
the section may be designed as an equivalent rectangular section of breadth bf ( beff ) .
Transverse reinforcement should be placed across the full width of the flange to resist the shear
developed between the web and the flange.
l1 l2 l3
Note: (i) the length of the cantilever should be less than half the length of the adjacent span
(ii) the ratio of adjacent span lengths should be between 0.67 and 1.50
eff
beff 1 beff 2
b1 b1 b2 b2
bw
b
Fig.7.11 Effective flange width parameters
Worked Example 7.6: Design of bending and transverse reinforcement for a T-section
A simply supported beam has a span L 6.0m and has the flanged cross-section shown in figure
7.12. the characteristic material strengths are f ck 25N / mm2 and f yk 500N / mm 2 and the
ultimate design uniformly distributed load wu is 44kN per metre.
600
H10 at 300
150
d=530
h=580
As 2-H25
250
M b
Fd fo
(d h f / 2) b f
where bfo is the breadth of flange outstanding from the web.
Thus
M (b f bw ) / 2
Fd
(d h f / 2) bf
149 103 (600 250 / 2)
96 kN
(530 150 / 2) 600
The longitudinal shear stress v Ed induced is
Fd 96 103
v Ed 0.43N / mm 2
(h f x) 150 1500
(ii) Check the strength of the concrete strut
From equation 7.11, to prevent crushing of the compressive strut in the flange
0.6(1 f ck / 250) f ck
v Ed
1.5(cot f tan f )
The moments are sagging so the flange is in compression and the limits for f are
26.5 f 45
with f the minimum value of 26.5
0.6(1 25 / 250) 25
v Ed (max) 3.6 ( 0.43N / mm 2 )
1.5(2.0 0.5)
and the concrete strut has sufficient strength with 26.5 ( for a flange in tension the limits on
are 38.6 45 or 1.0 cot 1.25 .)
Longitudinal reinforcement should also be provided in the flange as shown in figure 7.12.
Sectional areas per metre width for various bar spacings ( mm 2 )
Bar Spacing of bars
size 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 250 300
(mm)
6 566 377 283 226 189 162 142 113 94
8 1010 671 503 402 335 287 252 201 168
10 1570 1050 785 628 523 446 393 314 262
12 2260 1510 1130 905 754 646 566 452 377
16 4020 2680 2010 1610 1340 1150 1010 804 670
20 6280 4190 3140 2510 2090 1800 1570 1260 1050
25 9820 6550 4910 3930 3270 2810 2450 1960 1640
32 16100 10700 8040 6430 5360 4600 4020 3220 2680
40 25100 16800 12600 10100 8380 7180 6280 5030 4190
2H16
540
2H32+2H25
0.08L 0.08L
L
The following notation is used in the equations for the shear design
Asw the cross-sectional area of the two legs of the link
s the spacing of the stirrups
z the lever arm between the upper and lower chord members of the analogous truss
f ywd the design yield strength of the stirrup reinforcement
f yk the characteristic strength of the stirrup reinforcement
V Ed the shear force due to the actions at the ultimate limit state
VEf the ultimate shear force at the face of the support
Vwd the shear force in the stirrup
VRd ,s the shear resistance of the stirrups
VRd ,max the maximum design value of the shear which can be resisted by the concrete strut
5. Calculate the additional longitudinal tensile force caused by the shear force
Ftd 0.5VEd cot (7.15)
The minimum spacing of the links is governed by the requirements of placing and compacting the
concrete and should not normally be less than about 80mm. EC2 gives the following guidance on the
maximum link spacing:
(a) Maximum longitudinal spacing between shear links in a series of links
s1,max 0.75d (1 cot )
where is the inclination of the shear reinforcement to the longitudinal axis of the beam.
(b) Maximum transverse spacing between legs in a series of shear links
sb,max 0.75d ( 600mm)
1.45 m
308KN
SR nominal links
151KN
151KN
308KN
S.F diagram
300
6.0m
A B C D
F=1.35Gk +1.5Qk
Fig.7.13 Continuous beam with ultimate design bending moments and shear forces shown
Provide four H25 bars plus two H20 bars, area 2588mm 2 (top steel). The arrangement of the
reinforcement is shown in figure 7.14. At end support A two H25 bars have been provided as top
continuity steel to meet the requirement.
H8 @ 200 H8 @ 300 H10 @ 200
2-H20
4-H25
2-H25
A B
3-H25
300 2-H16 300
L= 5.0m
25 20 25
180
H8 H10
h=660
16 16 16 16
25 25 25 25 25 25
b w=300
6
Curtailment anchorage
5 M Ed / z envelope diagram
Ftd (hogging region)
4 a1
M Ed / z
4 5 6
Beam
2,3
1 1 2 3
M Ed / z M Ed / z envelope diagram
a1
3
(sagging region)
Ftd
2
1
For a straight bar with 32mm , the order of anchorage lengths are lbd 52 for a top bar and
lbd 36 for a bottom bar with class C30 concrete.
The curtailment of the tension reinforcement is based upon the envelope of tensile forces, Fs , derived
from the bending moment envelope as shown in figure 7.15 such that at any location along the span
Fs M Ed / z Ftd
where
When considering the curtailment the following rules must also be applied:
1. At least one-quarter of the bottom reinforcement should extend to the supports
2. The bottom reinforcement at an end support should be anchored into the supports as shown
in figure 7.16.
3. At an end support where there is little or no fixity the bottom steel should be designed to resist
a tensile force of 0.5VEd to allow for the tension induced by the shear with a minimum
requirement of 25% of the reinforcement provided in the span.
4. At an end support where is fixity but it has been analysed as a simply support, top steel should
be designed and anchored to resist at least 25 per cent of the maximum span moment.
5. At internal supports the bottom steel should extend at least 10 bar diameters beyond the
face of the support. To achieve continuity and resistance to such factors as accidental damage
or seismic forces, splice bars should be provided across the support with a full anchorage lap
on each side as shown in figure 7.17.
6. Where the loads on a beam are substantially uniformly distributed, simplified rules for
curtailment may be used. These rules only apply to continuous beams if the characteristic
variable load does not exceed the characteristic permanent load and the spans are
approximately equal. Figure 7,18 shows the rules in diagrammatic form.
l bd l bd l bd l bd
10
0.08L 0.08L
L
Simply supported
C=0.25L
C=0.15L
C 45
0.15L
0.1L
L
Continuous beam
Fig 7.18 Simplified rules for curtailment of bars in beams
iv) By Fixing
Simply supported slabs
Continuous slabs
As1 the area of tensile reinforcement that extends beyond the section being considered by
at least a full anchorage length plus one effective depth (d)
bw the smallest width of the section in the tensile area (mm)
Slabs are designed in the same way as beams except:
i) the breadth of the slab is already fixed and a unit breadth of 1m is used in the calculations;
ii) the shear stresses are usually low in a slab except when there are heavy concentrated loads;
iii) compression reinforcement is seldom required.
Where different concrete strengths are used, the values in table 8.1 may be modified by the factors
in table 8.2 provided 1 0.4% .
Table 8.2 Concrete strength modification factor
f ck ( N / mm 2 ) 25 30 35 40 45 50
Modification factor 0.94 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.14 1.19
referred to as punching shear. The critical surface for checking punching shear is shown as the
perimeter in figure 8.1 which is located at 2.0d from the loaded area.
2.0d
a
Critical
Section Loaded
b area
Plan
Load
d h
Elevation
Fig.8.1 Punching shear
The maximum force that can be carried by the slab without shear reinforcement ( VRd ,c ) can be
obtained using the values of v Rd ,c given in table 8.1 based on equations 8.1 and 8.2 for normal shear
in beams and slabs, where 1 ( y z ) where y and z are the reinforcement ratios, As / bd in
the two mutually perpendicular directions then
VRd ,c v Rd ,c du (8.3)
Where; d effective depth of section [average of the two steel layers in perpendicular directions
dy dz
]
2
u length of the punching shear perimeter.
Checks must be undertaken to ensure that the maximum permissible shear force ( VRd ,max ) is not
exceeded at the face of the loaded area.
The maximum permissible shear force is given by VRd ,max 0.5v1 f cd ud 0.5v1 ( f ck / 1.5)ud
Where; u is the perimeter of the loaded area
v1 is the strength reduction factor given by v1 0.6(1 f ck / 250) .
f ywd ,ef is the effective design strength of the reinforcement and is given by
f ywd ,ef 250 0.25d f ywd .
v Rd ,cs is the punching shear resistance of the reinforced slab
is the angle between shear reinforcement and the plane of the slab, so that sin 1 for critical
reinforcement.
This expression effectively allows for a 75 per cent contribution from the unreinforced concrete slab,
and for vertical kinks can be expressed as:
v Rd ,cs 0.75v Rd ,c
Asw
f ywd ,ef
1.5
s r u1
V
Where the required v Rd ,cs would be given by Ed .
u1 d
A check must also be made that the calculated reinforcement satisfies the minimum requirement that:
0.08 f ck ( s r st ) 0.053 f ck ( s r st )
Asw,min
1.5 f yk f yk
where s t is the spacing of links around the perimeter
Asw,min is the area of an individual link leg.
hence from table 8.1, v Rd ,c 0.56 for class C30 concrete and, from table 8.2, modification factor for
class C25 concrete 0.94 then
VRd ,c 83890 0.56 0.94 103
442KN ( VEd 650KN )
and punching shear reinforcement is required.
(iii) Check outer perimeter at which reinforcement is not required.
V 650 103
u out,ef Ed 5743mm
v Rd ,c d 0.56 0.94 215
This will occur at a distance xd from the face of the loaded area, such that
5743 2(300 300) 2 215 x
and x 3.36 ( 3.0)
(iv) Provision of reinforcement
Shear reinforcement should thus be provided within the zone extending from a distance not greater
than 0.5d and less than (3.36 1.5)d 1.86d from the loaded face.
For perimeters 0.75d apart, 3 perimeters of steel will thus be adequate loaded area (i.e.
sr 0.75d 160mm apart).
Since all perimeters lie within 2d ( 430mm) of the loaded and maximum link spacing, ( st ) , is
limited to 1.5d ( 323mm) .
The minimum link leg area is therefore given by:
0.053 f ck ( s r st ) 0.053 25(160 323)
Asw,min
f yk 500
27.3mm 2 which is satisfied by a 6mm diameter bar ( 28.3mm 2 )
Hence the assumed 8mm links will be adequate.
The area of steel required/perimeter is thus given by:
v Rd ,cs 0.75v Rd ,c
Asw
f ywd ,ef
1.5
s r u1
where, for the outer perimeter
VEd 650 103
VRd ,cs 0.775 N / mm 2
u1d 3902 215
v Rd ,c 0.94 0.56 0.526 N / mm 2 (as above)
f ywd ,ef 250 0.25 215 303 N / mm 2 ( 500)
and sr 160mm
(0.775 0.75 0.526) 160 3902
thus Asw
1.5 303
523mm 2
around each of the 3 proposed perimeters as summarized in the table below. The table indicates the
number of single-leg 8mm diameter links (area 50.3mm 2 ) proposed for each of the three
reinforcement perimeters taking account of the maximum required spacing and practical fixing
considerations. Bending reinforcement is spaced at 125mm centres in both directions; hence link
spacing is set at multiples of this values.
The calculations for bending reinforcement follow a similar procedure to that used in beam design.
The area of tension reinforcement is given by
M
As
0.87 f yk z
8.4.1 Single-span solid slabs
The basic span-effective depth ratio for this type of slab is 20:1 on the basis that it is lightly stressed
and that grade 500 steel is used in the design. For a start-point in design a value above this can usually
be estimated (unless the slab is known to be heavily loaded).
The effective span of the slab may be taken as the clear distance between the face of the supports
plus a distance at both ends taken as the lesser of (a) the distance from the face of the support to its
centerline and (b) one-half of the overall depth of the slab.
H10-150
300
4.5m
Table 8.4 Anchorage and lap length coefficients (length L K A bar size) for good bond conditions
K A for concrete strength, f ck ( N / mm 2 )
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Straight bars
Anchorage in tension and compression 47 40 36 32 29 27 25
Curved bars
Anchorage in tension 33 28 25 22 20 19 18
Anchorage in compression 47 40 36 32 29 27 25
% of bars lapped
at section
Compression and tension 25% 47 40 36 32 29 27 25
laps 33% 54 46 42 37 33 31 29
50% 66 56 51 45 41 38 35
50% 71 60 54 48 44 41 38
Notes:
1. For poor bond conditions divide the coefficients by 0.7.
2. For bars greater than 32mm divide the coefficients by [(132 )100] where is the bar
size.
Table 8.5 Ultimate bending moment and shear force coefficients in one-way spanning slabs
End support condition
At
Pinned Continuous At first
middle of At interior
Near interior
Outer End interior supports
middle of End span support
support support spans
end span
Moment 0 0.086Fl 0.04Fl 0.075Fl 0.086Fl 0.063Fl 0.063Fl
Shear 0.40F 0.46F 0.60F 0.50F
Notes:
1. F is the total design ultimate load, F (1.35Gk 1.5Qk ) L
2. L is the span length
Beam
Beam
Beam
Beam
Span Span Span Span
7m
Plan
Elevation
At the end supports there is a monolithic connection between the slab and the beam, therefore top
steel should be provided to resist any negative moment. The moment to be designed for is a minimum
of 25 per cent of the span moment, this is 5.1KNm . In fact, to provide a minimum of 0.13 per cent
of steel, H10 bars at 400mm centres have been specified.
Transverse reinforcement 0.0013bd
0.0013 1000 140
182mm 2 / m
Provide H10 at 400mm centres top and bottom, wherever there is main reinforcement
( 196mm 2 / m ).
Load on beam A
Beam D
Beam C
Load on Load on
beam C beam D
Load on beam B
Beam B
Fig.8.5 loads carried by supporting beams
The slab should be reinforced uniformly across the full width, in each direction.
The effective depth d used in calculating Asy should be less than that for Asx because of the different
depths of the two layers of reinforcement.
At least 40 per cent of the mid-span reinforcement should extend to the supports and the remaining
60 per cent should extend to within 0.1l x or 0.1l y of the appropriate support.
Table 8.6 Bending-moment coefficients for slabs spanning in two directions
at right angles, simply supported on four sides
l y / lx 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.75 2.0
a sx 0.062 0.074 0.084 0.093 0.099 0.104 0.113 0.118
a sy 0.062 0.061 0.059 0.055 0.051 0.046 0.037 0.029
Worked Example 8.5: Design the reinforcement for a simply supported slab
The slab is 220mm thick and spans in two directions. The effective span in each direction is 4.5m
and 6.3m and the slab supports a variable load of 10KN / m 2 . The characteristic material strengths are
f ck 25N / mm 2 and f yk 500N / mm 2 .
l y / l x 6.3 / 4.5 1.4
From table 8.6, a sx 0.099 and asy 0.051.
Self-weight of slab 220 25 10 3 5.5 KN / m 2
Ultimate load 1.35g k 1.5q k
1.35 5.5 1.5 10.0 22.43KN / m 2
Bending-short span
With class XC-1 exposure conditions take d 185mm .
M sx asx nlx2 0.099 22.43 4.52 45.0KNm
M sx 45.0 106
0.053
bd 2 f ck 1000 1852 25
From the lever arm equation
z d [0.5 (0.25 K / 1.134) ] d [0.5 (0.25 0.053/ 1.134) ] 0.951d 0.95d
Therefore adopt upper limit of 0.95d and lever arm z 0.95d 0.95 185 176mm
and
M sx 45.0 106
Asx 588mm 2 / m
0.87 f yk z 0.87 500 176
Provide H12 at 175mm centres, Asx 646mm 2 / m .
Bending-long span
M sy a sy nlx2 0.051 22.43 4.5 2 23.16KNm
Since the reinforcement for this span will have a reduced effective depth, take z 176 12 164mm .
Therefore
M sy 23.16 106
Asy 325mm 2 / m
0.87 f yk z 0.87 500 164
Provide H10 at 200mm centres, Asy 393mm 2 / m .
100As ,req100 393
2 0.24%
bd 1000 164
which is greater than 0.13, the minimum for transverse steel, with class C25/30 concrete.
The arrangement of the reinforcement is shown in figure 8.6.
H10-200
H12-175
4.5m
Table 8.7 Bending moment coefficients for two-way spanning rectangular slabs supported by beams
Short span coefficients, sx for values of l y / l x Long-span
Type of panel and coefficients, sy for
moments considered 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.75 2.0
all value of l y / l x
Interior panels
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.031 0.037 0.042 0.046 0.050 0.053 0.059 0.063 0.032
Positive moment at mid-span 0.024 0.028 0.032 0.035 0.037 0.040 0.044 0.048 0.024
One short edge discontinuous
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.039 0.044 0.048 0.052 0.055 0.058 0.063 0.067 0.037
Positive moment at mid-span 0.029 0.033 0.036 0.039 0.041 0.043 0.047 0.050 0.028
One long edge discontinuous
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.039 0.049 0.056 0.062 0.068 0.073 0.082 0.089 0.037
Positive moment at mid-span 0.030 0.036 0.042 0.047 0.051 0.055 0.062 0.067 0.028
Two adjacent edges discontinuous
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.047 0.056 0.063 0.069 0.074 0.078 0.087 0.093 0.045
Positive moment at mid-span 0.036 0.042 0.047 0.051 0.055 0.059 0.065 0.070 0.034
Two short edges discontinuous
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.046 0.050 0.054 0.057 0.060 0.062 0.067 0.070 -
Positive moment at mid-span 0.034 0.038 0.040 0.043 0.045 0.047 0.050 0.053 0.034
Two long edges discontinuous
Negative moment at continuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.045
Positive moment at mid-span 0.034 0.046 0.056 0.065 0.072 0.078 0.091 0.100 0.034
Three edges discontinuous (one
long edge continuous)
Negative moment at continuous edge 0.057 0.065 0.071 0.076 0.081 0.084 0.092 0.098 -
Positive moment at mid-span 0.043 0.048 0.053 0.057 0.060 0.063 0.069 0.074 0.044
Three edges discontinuous (one
short edge continuous)
Negative moment at continuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.058
Positive moment at mid-span 0.042 0.054 0.063 0.071 0.078 0.084 0.096 0.105 0.044
Four edges discontinuous
Positive moment at mid-span 0.055 0.065 0.074 0.081 0.087 0.092 0.103 0.111 0.056
ly ly
lx
8
Edge strip
Middle strip
Edge strip
Edge strip
ly 3ly ly lx
8 4 8 8
support
Discontinuous
a b supported edge
l y =6.25m
support
d c
support
8.6.3 Design
The slab is designed as a T-section with the effective flange breadths. Near the supports the slab
is made solid at about 0.5 ~ 1.0m from the support to increase shear strength.
The slabs are usually made solid under partitions and concentrated loads.
During construction the hollow tiles should be well soaked in water prior to placing the concrete,
otherwise shrinkage cracking of the top concrete flange is liable to occur.
The thickness of the concrete flange should not be less than:
1. 40mm or one-tenth of the clear distance between ribs, whichever is the greater, for slabs with
permanent blocks;
2. 50mm or one-tenth tenth of the clear distance between ribs, whichever is the greater, for slabs
without permanent blocks.
The rib width will be governed by
1. cover
2. bar-spacing
3. fire resistance requirements
The ribs should be spaced no further apart 1.5m and their depth below the flange should not be
greater than four times their width.
Transverse ribs should be provided at spacing no greater than ten times the overall slab depth.
Span-effective depth ratios will be based on the shorter span with the basic values given in figure
7.2 multiplied by 0.8 where the ratio of the flange width to the rib width exceeds 3.
At least 50 per cent of the tensile reinforcement in the span should continue to the supports and be
anchored.
A light reinforcement mesh in the topping flange is provided:
1. to control cracking due to shrinkage or thermal movement;
2. to distribute concentrated or moving loads;
3. to give added strength and durability to the slab;
4. to serve as distribution bars for tension bars over supports
The minimum area of reinforcement mesh should not be less than 0.13% of the topping flange.
Waffle slabs are designed as ribbed slabs and their design moments each way are obtained from
the moment coefficients tabulated in table 8.7 for two-way spanning slabs.
Supporting beam
light mesh
Fig.8.9 Sections through ribbed and hollow block floors, and waffle slab
d =160 h =200
60
125 400
Cross-section at mid-span
Table 8.8 Minimum dimensions and axis distance for RC slabs for fire resistance
Minimum dimensions (mm)
Standard fire Two-way spanning
One-way Ribs in two-way spanning
resistance
spanning l y / l x 1.5 1.5 l y / l x 2.0 ribbed slab
100 120
hs 80 80 80 bmin
200
REI 60
25 15
a 20 10 15
a 10
120 160
hs 100 100 100 bmin
250
REI 90
35 25
a 30 15 20
a 15
160 190
hs 120 120 120 bmin
REI 300
120 45 40
a 40 20 25
a 30
450 700
hs 175 175 175 bmin
REI -
240 70 60
a 65 40 50
a -
The calculations are for an end span (which will be most critical) for which the moments and shears
can be determined from the coefficients in table 8.5.
Considering a 0.4m width of floor as supported by each rib:
Ultimate load 0.4(0.35g k 1.5q k )
0.4(0.35 4.5 1.5 2.5)
3.93KN / m
Ultimate load on the span, F 3.93 5.0 19.65KN
Bending
1. At mid-span design as a T-section:
M 0.086Fl 0.08619.65 5.0 8.45KNm
The effective breadth of flange bw beff 1 beff 2 where
beff 1 beff 2 0.2b1 0.1l0 0.2l0 b1
with b1 (400 125) / 2 137mm and l 0 0.85 5000 4250mm
thus
bw beff 1 beff 2 125 2(0.2 137 0.1 4250) 1030mm
or 0.2 4250) 850mm
which both exceed the rib spacing of 400mm, which governs
M 8.45 106
0.033
bd 2 f ck 400 1602 25
From the lever arm equation
z d [0.5 (0.25 K / 1.134) ] d [0.5 (0.25 0.033/ 1.134) ] 0.97d 0.95d . Thus
the neutral axis depth lies within the flange.
Therefore adopt upper limit of 0.95d and lever arm z 0.95d 0.95160 152mm
and
M 8.45 106
As 127.8mm 2
0.87 f yk z 0.87 500 152
Provide two H10 bars in the ribs, As 157mm 2 .
2. At the end interior support design as a rectangular section for the solid slab:
M 0.086Fl 0.08619.65 5.0 8.45KNm as in 1.
and As 128mm 2 as at mid-span
Provide two H10 bars in each 0.4m width of slab, As 157mm 2 .
3. At the section where the ribs terminate: this occurs 0.6m from the centerline of the support and the
moment may be hogging so that 125mm ribs must provide the concrete area in compression to resist
the design moment. The maximum moment of resistance of the concrete is
M 0.167 f ck bd 2 0.167 25 1251602 106 13.36KNm
which must be greater than the moment at this section, therefore compression steel is not required.
Shear
Maximum shear in the rib 0.6m from the support centerline (end span)
VEd 0.6 F 0.6 3.93 0.6 19.65 0.6 3.93 9.43KN
As 157
1 0.0079
bd 125 160
From table 8.1, the shear resistance without reinforcement VRd ,c vRd ,c bd where
v Rd ,c 0.68N / mm 2 and, from table 8.2, the strength modification factor 0.94 . Hence:
VRd ,c vRd ,c bd 0.94 0.68 125160 12.78KN
As VRd ,c is greater than V Ed then no shear reinforcement is required provided that the bars in the ribs
are securely located during construction.
Bending
1. At mid-span: design as a T-section.
Positive moment at mid-span msx sx nlx2 0.02411.85 6 2 10.24KNm / m
Moment carried by each rib 0.4 10.24 4.10KNm
M 4.1 106
0.016
bd 2 f ck 400 1602 25
where the effective breadth is 400mm as in the previous example.
From the lever arm equation
z d [0.5 (0.25 K / 1.134) ] d [0.5 (0.25 0.016 / 1.134) ] 0.98d 0.95d . Thus the
neutral axis depth lies within the flange and
M 4.1 106
As 62 mm 2
0.87 f yk z 0.87 500 0.95 160
Provide two H10 bars in each rib at the bottom of the beam, As 157mm 2 to satisfy minimum
requirement of 0.13bd % 0.0013 400 160 83mm 2 / rib . Note that since the service stress in the
steel will be reduced, this lead to a higher span-effective depth ratio thus ensuring that the span-
effective depth ratio of the slab is kept within acceptable limits.
3. At the section where the ribs terminate: the maximum hogging moment of resistance of the
concrete ribs is 13.36KNm as in the previous example. This is greater than the moment at this section,
therefore compression steel is not required.
Shear
From the table 8.9 the shear force coefficient for a continuous edge support is 0.33. Hence, for one
rib, the shear at the support
Vsx vx nl x b 0.33 11.85 6 0.4 9.38KN
Maximum shear in the rib 0.6m from the centerline is
VEd 9.38 0.6 11.85 0.4 6.54KN
At this position, VRd ,c vRd ,c 125 160 and
100As 100 157
1 0.79%
bd 125 160
Hence from table 8.1, v Rd ,c 0.68N / mm 2 and, from table 8.2, the strength modification factor
0.94 . Hence:
VRd ,c vRd ,c bd 0.94 0.68 125160 12.8KN
Therefore the unreinforced section is adequate in shear, and no links are required provided that the
bars in the ribs are securely located during construction.
Table 8.9 Shear force coefficients for uniformly loaded rectangular panels supported
on four sides with provision for torsion at corners
vx for values of l y / l x
vy
Type of panel and location 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.75 2.0
Four edges continuous
continuous 0.33 0.36 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.48 0.50 0.33
One short edge discontinuous
Continuous edge 0.36 0.39 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.47 0.50 0.52 0.36
Discontinuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.24
One long edge discontinuous
Continuous edge 0.36 0.40 0.44 0.47 0.49 0.51 0.55 0.59 0.36
Discontinuous edge 0.24 0.27 0.29 0.31 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 -
Two adjacent edges
discontinuous
0.40 0.44 0.47 0.50 0.52 0.54 0.57 0.60 0.40
Continuous edge
0.26 0.29 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.38 0.40 0.26
Discontinuous edge
Two short edges discontinuous
Continuous edge 0.40 0.43 0.45 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.52 0.54 -
Discontinuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.26
Two long edges discontinuous
Continuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.40
Discontinuous edge 0.26 0.30 0.33 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.44 0.47 -
Three edges discontinuous
(one long edge discontinuous)
Continuous edge 0.45 0.48 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.57 0.60 0.63 -
Discontinuous edge 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.39 0.41 0.29
Three edges discontinuous
(one short edge discontinuous)
Continuous edge - - - - - - - - 0.45
Discontinuous edge 0.29 0.33 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.42 0.45 0.48 0.30
Four edges discontinuous
Discontinuous edge 0.33 0.36 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.45 0.48 0.50 0.33
Light mesh
Landing Landing
H12-400
H1
Open well 0-
400
1.5m
H12-300
H12-400
Span 3.0m
Span
The permanent load is calculated along the slope length of the stairs but the variable load is based on
the plan area. If the total design load on the stair is F and the staircase is cast monolithically with the
floor slab, then positive moment at mid span, M Fl / 10 , and negative moment at supports,
M Fl / 10 . If the staircase is precast, the positive design moment, M Fl / 8 . The shear force in
both cases, SF F / 2 .
When the staircase is built monolithically at its ends into a structural member spanning at right angles
to its span, the effective span is given by
Leff Ln a1 a 2
where Ln is the clear horizontal distance between supporting members
a1 is half the breadth of supporting member at one end
a 2 is half the breadth of supporting member at other end
The thickness of the waist is taken as the slab thickness.
The design procedure is the same as that of slabs.
Try a 140mm thick waist, effective depth, d 115mm . This would give an initial estimate of the
span-effective ratio of 26.1 (3000/115) which, from 7.2, lies a little above the basic value for a lightly
stressed simply supported slab.
Bending reinforcement
M 13.16 106
0.034
bd 2 f ck 1000 1152 30
From the lever arm equation
z d [0.5 (0.25 K / 1.134) ] d [0.5 (0.25 0.034 / 1.134) ] 0.97d 0.95d .
M 13.46 106
As 283mm 2 / m
0.87 f yk z 0.87 500 0.95 115
Maximum allowable spacing is 3h 3 140 420mm with an upper limit of 400mm.
Provide H12 bars at 300mm centres, As 377mm 2 / m .
Secondary reinforcement
Transverse distribution steel 0.2 As ,min 0.2 377 75.4mm 2 / m
This is very small, and adequately covered by H10 bars at the maximum allowable spacing of 400mm
centres, area 174mm 2 / m .
Continuity bars at the top and bottom of the span should be provided and, whereas about 50per cent
of the main steel would be reasonable, the maximum spacing is limited to 400mm. Hence provide,
say, H12 bars at 400mm centres as continuity steel.
Table 9.1 Minimum dimensions and axis distance for RC columns and walls for fire resistance
Standard fire Minimum dimensions (mm)
resistance Column width bmin /axis distance, a, of Wall thickness/axis distance, a, of the
the main bars main bars
Columns exposed Columns exposed Wall exposed on Wall exposed on
on more than one on one side one side two sides
side
R60 250/46 155/25 130/10 140/10
350/40
R90 350/53 155/25 140/25 170/25
450/40
R120 350/57 175/35 160/35 220/35
450/51
R240 600/70 295/70 270/60 350/60
9.2 Slenderness ratio, Effective height and Limiting slenderness ratio of column
9.2.1 Slenderness ratio of a column
The slenderness ratio of a column bent about an axis is given by
l l0
0 (9.1)
i ( I / A)
where
l 0 is the effective height of the column
i is the radius of gyration about the axis considered
I is the second moment of area of the section about the axis
A is the cross-section area of the column
l
9.2.2 Effective height 0 of a column
The effective height of a column, l 0 , is the height of a theoretical column of equivalent section but
pinned at both ends. This depends on the degree of fixity at each end of the column, which itself
depends on the relative stiffness of the columns and beam connected to either end of the column
under consideration.
EC2 gives two formulae for calculating the effective height:
For braced members:
k1 k2
l0 0.5l 1 1 (9.2)
0.45 k1 0.45 k 2
For unbraced members the larger of:
k k
l0 l 1 10 1 2 (9.3.a)
k1 k 2
and
k k
l 0 l 1 1 1 2 (9.3.b)
1 k1 1 k 2
In the above formulae, k1 and k2 are the relative flexibilities of the rotational restraints at ends 1
and 2 of the column respectively. At each end k1 and k2 can be taken as:
A 1/(1 0.2ef )
B 1 2w
C 1.7 rm
ef effective creep ratio (if not known A can be taken as 0.7)
w As f yd /( Ac f cd ) (if not known B can be taken as 1.1)
f yd the design yield strength of the reinforcement
f cd the design compressive strength of the concrete
As the total area of longitudinal reinforcement
n N Ed /( Ac f cd )
N Ed the design ultimate axial load in the column
rm M 01 / M 02 (if rm not known then C can be taken as 0.7)
M 01 , M 02 are first order moments at the end of the column with M 02 M 01
500
700
Beam
Length=6.0m Length=4.0m
h col =3.0m
400
Z
300
Y Y
Beam
It can be seen that the column will have the highest slenderness ratio for bending about YY where
h 300mm and also the end restraints are the less stiff 300 500 beams.
Slenderness ratio
I bh3 / 12 h 300
Radius of gyration, i col 86.6mm
Acol bh 3.464 3.464
Slenderness ratio l0 / i 1.77 103 / 86.6 20.4
For a braced column the minimum limiting value of will be given by
min 26.2 / N Ed /( Ac f cd )
where
N Ed /( Ac f cd ) 1280103 /(400 300 25 / 1.5) 0.64
thus
The basic equations or the approximate method can be used when an unsymmetrical arrangement of
reinforcement is required, or when the cross-section is non-rectangular.
Whichever design method is used, a column should not be designed for a moment less than
N Ed emin , where emin has the greater value of h / 30 or 20mm. This is to allow for tolerance in
construction. The dimension h is overall size of the column cross-section in the plane of bending.
s Fs
4.0m
Plan
P
3rd floor
3.0m
2nd floor
3.0m
1st floor
3.0m
400
ground
floor 300 400 columns
Q
6.0m 4.0m
1.35G k + 1.5 Q k
1.35G k + 1.5 Q k
k column
Maximum ultimate load at each floor 4.0(1.35g k 1.5q k ) per meter length of beam
4(1.35 10 1.5 15)
144KN / m
Minimum ultimate load at each floor 4.0 1.35g k per meter length of beam
4.0 1.35 10
54KN / m per metrelength of beam
Consider first the design of the centre column at the underside (u.s.) of the first floor. The critical
arrangement of load that will cause the maximum moment in the column is shown in figure 9.6a.
Column loads
Second and third floors 2 144 10 / 2 1440KN
First floor 144 6 / 2 54 4 / 2 540KN
Column self-weight, say 2 14 28KN
N Ed 2008KN
Similar arrangement of load will give the axial load in the column at the underside (u.s.) and top side
(t.s.) of each floor level and these values of N Ed are shown in table 9.3.
Table 9.3
Floor N Ed M Ed N Ed M Ed As f yk As (mm 2 )
(KN ) (KNm ) bhfck bh 2 f ck bhfck
3rd u.s. 540 82.6 0.18 0.07 0 240
2nd t.s. 734 68.4 0.24 0.06 0 240
+ 540
2nd u.s. 1274 68.4 0.42 0.06 0 240
1st t.s. 1468 68.4 0.49 0.06 0.10 600
+ 540
1st u.s. 2008 68.4 0.67 0.06 0.30 1800
Column moments
The loading arrangement and the substitute frame for determining the column moments at the first
and second floors are shown in figure 9.6c.
Member stiffness are
k AB 1 bh3 1 0.3 0.7 3
0.71 10 3
2 2 12L AB 2 12 6
k BC 1 bh3 1 0.3 0.7 3
1.07 103
2 2 12LBC 2 12 4
0.3 0.4 3
k col 0.53 10 3
12 3.0
therefore
k (0.71 1.07 2 0.53)10 3
2.84 103
and
k col 0.53
distribution factor for the column 0.19
k 2.84
Fixed end moments at B are
144 6 2
F.E. M . BA 432KNm
12
54 4 2
F.E. M . BC 72KNm
12
Thus
Column moment M Ed 0.19(432 72) 68.4 KNm
At the 3rd floor
k (0.71 1.07 0.53)10 3
2.31 103
and
0.53
Column moment M Ed (432 72) 82.6 KNm
2.31
The areas of reinforcement in table 9.3 are determined by using the design chart of figure 9.4.
Sections through the column are shown figure 9.7.
400
4H25 4H16
(a) Ground to 1st Floor (b) 1st to 3rd Floor
Cover for the reinforcement is taken as 50mm and d 2 / h 80 / 400 0.2 . The minimum area of
reinforcement allowed in the section is given by:
As 0.002bh 0.002 300 400 240mm 2
and the maximum area is
As 0.08bh 0.008 300 400 9600mm 2
and the reinforcement provided is within these limits.
0.567fck
d' fsc A's
e
A's x s
h/2 d neutral 0.567f ck bs
axis
h/2 As
d2 fs As
b
1. Select a depth of neutral axis, x (for this design method where the moments are relatively large,
x would generally be less than h).
2. Determine the steel strains sc and s from the strain distribution.
3. Determine the steel stresses f sc and f s from the equations relating to the stress-strain curve for
the reinforcing bars.
d '=80
A's x
400
340
neutral
axis sc
As
d 2=60
s
Section Strains
Fig.9.9 Unsymmetrical column design example
1. Select a depth of neutral axis, x 190mm .
2. From the strain diagram
0.0035 0.0035
steel strain sc ( x d ) (190 80) 0.00203
x 190
and
0.0035 0.0035
steel strain s (d x) (340 190) 0.00276
x 190
3. From the stress-strain curve and the relevant equations of section 5.1 yield strain, y 0.00217
for grade 500 steel
s 0.00217; therefore f s 500/ 1.15 435N / mm 2
and
sc 0.00217; therefore f sc Es sc 200103 0.00203 406N / mm2 , compression.
4. In equation 9.7
h
N Ed e d 2 0.567 f ck bs(d s / 2) f sc As (d d )
2
M Ed 230 106
e 209mm
N Ed 1100 103
s 0.8 x 0.8 190 152mm
To allow for the area of concrete displaced
f sc becomes 406 0.567 f ck 406 0.567 25 392N / mm2
and from equation 9.7
1100103 (209 140) 0.567 25 300152(340 152 / 2)
As
392(340 80)
2093mm 2
5. From equation 9.8
N Ed 0.567 f ck bs f sc As f s As
(0.567 25 300 152) (392 2093) (1100 103 )
As
435
843mm 2
Thus
As As 2093 843 2936mm 2 for x 190mm
6. Values of As As calculated for other depths of neutral axis, x, are plotted in figure 9.10. From
this figure the minimum area of reinforcement required occurs with x 210mm . Using this
depth of neutral axis, step 2 to 5 are repeated giving
sc 0.00217, s 0.00217
f sc f yk / m 435N / mm 2 and f s 435N / mm 2 tension
so that
As 1837mm2 and As 891mm2
(Alternatively separate values of As and As as calculated for each value of x could have also
have been plotted against x and their values read from the graph at x 210mm .) This area would
be provided with
As three H25 plus two H20 bars
2098mm2
and
As one H25 plus two H20 bars
2098mm2
A's +As
3000
2900
2800
2700
180 190 200 210 220 230
Depth of neutral axis, x
Fig.9.10 Design chart for unsymmetrical column example
slenderness ratio
ef effective creep ratio
N ud N Ed
K2 1.0 (9.9)
N ud N bal
where N ud is the ultimate axial load such that
N ud 0.567 f ck Ac 0.87 f yk Asc
and N bal is the axial load at balanced failure and may be taken as approximately N bal 0.29 f ck Ac
for symmetrical reinforcement.
In order to calculate K 2 , the area As of the column reinforcement must be known and hence a trial-
and-error approach is necessary, taking an initial conservative value of K 2 1.0 . Values of K 2 are
marked on the column design charts as shown in figure 9.4.
Eccentricities are
M 1 10 103
e01 5.9mm
N Ed 1700
M 2 70 103
e02 41.2mm
N Ed 1700
where e02 is negative since the column is bent in double curvature.
Z
M 2 =70kNm
M
'
d=60
d=240
h=300
Y Y
M 1 =10kNm
Z
The limiting slenderness ratio can be calculated from equation 9.4 where:
A 1/(1 0.2ef ) 1/(1 (0.2 0.87)) 0.85
Table 9.4
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Mt As f yk
K2 Mt bh 2 f ck bhfck K2
1.0 225 0.222 0.80 0.78
0.78 190 0.187 0.6 0.73
The iterations are continued until the value of K 2 in columns (1) and (5) of the table are in reasonable
agreement, which in this design occurs after two iterations. So that the steel area required is
0.6bhfck 0.6 450 300 25
As 4050mm 2
f yk 500
and K 2 0.74 .
As a check on the final value of K 2 interpolated from the design chart:
N bal 0.29 f ck Ac
0.29 25 300 450103
978kN
N Ed 0.567 f ck Ac 0.87 f yk As
(0.567 25 300 450 0.87 500 4050)103
3675kN
N ud N Ed 3675 1700
K2 0.73 ( 1.0)
N ud N bal 3675 978
which agrees with the final value in column 5 of table 9.4.
(a) (b)
Fig.10.1 Foundation failures: (a) sliding failure; (b) overturning failure
10.1.2 Foundation types
There are many types of foundations which are commonly used, namely strip, pad and raft. The
foundations may bear directly on the ground or be supported on piles. The choice of foundation type
will largely depend upon (1) ground conditions (i.e. strength and type of soil) and (2) type of structure
(i.e. layout and level of loading).
Pad footings are usually square or rectangular slabs and used to support a single column (Fig. 10.2).
The pad may be constructed using mass concrete or reinforced concrete depending on the relative
size of the loading. Continuous strip footings are used to support loadbearing walls or under a line of
closely spaced columns (Fig. 10.3). Strip footings are designed as pad footings in the transverse
direction and in the longitudinal direction as an inverted continuous beam subject to the ground
bearing pressure.
N N N N
= = =
A B C D
Elevation
Plan
Soft strata
Hard strata
The piles may be made of precast reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete or in-situ reinforced
concrete. Loads are transmitted from the piles to the surrounding strata by end bearing and/or friction.
End bearing piles derive most of their carrying capacity from the penetration resistance of the soil at
the toe of the pile, while friction piles rely on the adhesion or friction between the sides of the pile
and the soil.
10.1.3 Foundation design
Foundation failure may arise as a result of (a) allowable bearing capacity of the soil being exceeded,
or (b) bending and/or shear failure of the base.
The first condition allows the plan-area of the base to be calculated, being equal to the design load
divided by the bearing capacity of the soil, i.e.
design load
Ground pressure bearing capacity of soil
plan area
Since the settlement of the structure occurs during its working life, the design loadings to be
considered when calculating the size of the base should be taken as those for the serviceability limit
state (i.e. 1.0Gk 1.0Qk ). The calculations to determine the thickness of the base and the bending
and shear reinforcement should, however, be based on ultimate loads (i.e. 1.35Gk 1.5Qk ).
M M
D D Y/3 e
Centroid
p2
p p1 p
Y
e0 e D/6 e D/6
N N 6M 2N
p p p
B D B D B D2 B Y
D
where: Y 3 e
2
(a) (b) (c)
Fig.10.6 Pad-footing- pressure distributions
as the footing so as to form a 'kicker' or support for the columns shutters. In these cases the dowels
lap length should be measured from the top of the kicker.
The critical sections through the base for checking shear, punching shear and bending are shown in
figurc 10.8. The shearing force and bending moments are caused by the ultimate loads from the
column and the weight of the base should not be included in these calculations.
The thickness of the base is often goverened by the requirements for shear resistance.
Dowels
lap length
d h
h
D
Maximum
shear 2.0d Punching shear perimeter
= column perimeter +4pd
B As Shear
Bending 1.0d
Fig.10.7 Pad footing reinforcement details Fig.10.8 Critical sections for design
d=520
h=600
12H16@225 e.w.
2.8m. sq
Therefore
Punching shear force VEd 239(2.82 5.22) 626KN
VEd
Punching shear stress v Ed
perimeter d
626 103
0.15N / mm 2
8134 520
This ultimate shear stress is not excessive, (see table 8.1) therefore h 600mm will be a suitable
estimate.
5. Bending reinforcement-see figure 10.10(a).
At the column face which is the critical section
1.2
M Ed (239 2.8 1.2) 482KNm
2
1.2 m 0.68 m 1.0d=0.52 m
2.8 m
The steel stress should be calculated under the action of the quasi-permanent loading which can be
estimated fron the equation,
f yk (Gk 0.3Qk )
fs
1.15(1.35Gk 1.5Qk )
500(1000 0.3 350)
256N / mm 2
1.15(1.35 1000 1.5 350)
Therefore from table below the maximum allowable bar size is 16mm. hence, minimum area and
bar size requirements as specified by the code for the pueposes of crack control are met.