Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Constructivism Reflection
As I read the article Poor Scholars Soliloquy I found several problems with how the
author was being taught. By using the methods described, the teacher limited what learning could
Problem 1: The student wasnt allowed to use his real-life experiences and knowledge to
learn new things. One example of this was the fact that his geography lesson was on imports and
exports of Chile, and he struggled with that. A constructivist teacher would have guided him to
research his experience at the Chicago market, studying where that livestock was being exported
to as a geographical lesson. Also, when his uncle had him figure out the map they would follow
to get the livestock to market, that was a geographical lesson as well. He learned about economics
Problem 2: The assignments given by the teacher were not relevant, so he struggled to
complete what was expected of him. An example of this was when he had to write a theme paper
on What a Daffodil Thinks of Spring. A constructivist teacher would make the writing
assignment relevant and authentic to him, such as by having him write about his experiences at the
stockyards.
Problem 3: There wasnt opportunity for group-based cooperative learning. One example
of this was when the student was made to stay after school to try to learn the Articles of
Confederation. If he had been first given the opportunity to work together in a group to do
something that showed good citizenship, such as cleaning up the lot to make a playground, the
teacher could have then let the group research the Articles of Confederation and apply that to
the playground project. A constructivist teacher would turn the subject of citizenship into a
cooperative learning by a group, where they shared ideas and explored together what it takes to be
a good citizen.
Problem 4: Higher level skills werent presented to the students, so they werent given
opportunity to think critically and creatively and solve problems. This was evident when the
teacher taught them about air pressure through an experiment. A constructivist teacher would
introduce the Big Idea of air pressure through the experiment, but then give the students the
opportunity to find out more, through critical and creative thinking, about examples of air pressure,
such as the Diesel the student wanted to tell her about in class. Divergent thinking is allowed in
Problem 5: There were times that the teacher needed to adapt the curriculum to the
students needs, but this didnt happen. From reading the article, it sounds like the student
struggled with memorization. A constructivist teacher would allow the student to just learn a
fraction of the presidents, or learn groups of inventors as they became relevant in what was being
studied.
Problem 6: This student wasnt assessed on what he actually learned. Throughout the
article, the student mentioned several higher level skills he had mastered, but the teacher wasnt
accepting what he knew as mastery of her expectations. He mentioned that he had to stay after
school at various times to work on mastery of memorization of presidents, learning the Articles
of Confederation, yet memorizing those things show no mastery of the higher level thinking that
were what actually needed to be assessed. A constructivist teacher would find assessment methods
such as group projects, rubrics, and individual creative projects to assess whether the desired skills
have been mastered. For example, a report on the trip to the market would serve as a writing
assignment, and could be assessed for mastery of writing skills, and the group project on the
construction of the playground could be assessed for mastery of knowledge of the meaning of the
Articles of Confederation.
If the student in this article had been taught by a constructivist teacher, he most likely
would not have had to repeat a grade, and could have been more successful in completing his
education.