Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Safety Pays
3
Worksite Analysis
Administrative
PPE
Step 1.
Reach into metal box to right of
machine, grasp casting, and carry to
wheel.
Hazard Prevention and Control
14
Step 2.
Push casting against wheel to grind off
burr.
Hazard Prevention and Control
15
Step 3.
Place finished casting in box to left of
machine.
Hazard Prevention and Control
16
Hazard Prevention and Control
17
Hazard Prevention and Control
18
Hazard Prevention and Control
19
Hazard Prevention and Control
20
Hazard Prevention and Control
21
Engineering meaning
Administrative meaning
PPE meaning
Hazard Prevention and Control
22
Elimination/Substitution
Requires a physical
Most
change to the
Effective workplace
Requires worker or
employer to do
something
Requires
worker to
wear
something
Least
Effective
Engineering Control
26
Other Examples:
Mechanical Guards
Wet Methods for Dust
Enclosures/Isolation
Dilution Ventilation
Local Exhaust
Proper
equipment Re-designed Tools
Engineering Control
The basic concept behind engineering controls is that, to the
28
extent feasible, the work environment and the job itself
should be designed to eliminate hazards or reduce exposure
CONTROL AT THE SOURCE!
to hazards. While this approach is called engineering
Limits the hazard but doesnt entirely remove it.
controls, it does not necessarily mean that an engineer is
required to design the control.
Other Examples:
Engineering controls Mechanical Guards
are the "first line of defense" against
Wet Methods
injury/illness, because they havefor
theDust
potential to completely
eliminate a hazard, Enclosures/Isolation
and do not rely on human behavior to
Dilutionrather
be effective. For instance, Ventilation
than require employees to
wear respiratory protection which must be monitored,
Local to
inspected, trained, managed, it's much more effective Exhaust
install
Propera ventilation system that does not require any of those
management activities
equipment Re-designed Tools
or, better yet, find an alternative
substitute that is less hazardous.
Administrative Control
29
Training
Administrative Control
30
Special Clothing
Eye Protection
Hearing Protection
Respiratory Protection
The model was then updated in 1975, and again in 1994, when he
published his best-known work, "Evaluating Training Programs."
Level 1: Reaction
This level measures how your trainees (the people being
trained), reacted to the training. Obviously, you want them
to feel that the training was a valuable experience, and you
want them to feel good about the instructor, the topic, the
material, its presentation, and the venue.
It's important to measure reaction, because it helps you
understand how well the training was received by your
audience. It also helps you improve the training for future
trainees, including identifying important areas or topics that
are missing from the training.
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training
Evaluation Model
43
Level 2: Learning
At level 2, you measure what your trainees have learned. How
much has their knowledge increased as a result of the training?
When you planned the training session, you hopefully started
with a list of specific learning objectives: these should be the
starting point for your measurement. Keep in mind that you can
measure learning in different ways depending on these
objectives, and depending on whether you're interested in
changes to knowledge, skills, or attitude.
It's important to measure this, because knowing what your
trainees are learning and what they aren't will help you improve
future training.
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training
Evaluation Model
44
Level 3: Behaviour
At this level, you evaluate how far your trainees have changed their
behaviour, based on the training they received. Specifically, this looks
at how trainees apply the information.
It's important to realize that behaviour can only change if conditions
are favourable. For instance, imagine you've skipped measurement at
the first two Kirkpatrick levels and, when looking at your group's
behaviour, you determine that no behaviour change has taken place.
Therefore, you assume that your trainees haven't learned anything and
that the training was ineffective.
However, just because behaviour hasn't changed, it doesn't mean that
trainees haven't learned anything. Perhaps their boss won't let them
apply new knowledge. Or, maybe they've learned everything you
taught, but they have no desire to apply the knowledge themselves.
Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training
Evaluation Model
45
Level 4: Results
At this level, you analyze the final results of your training.
This includes outcomes that you or your organization have
determined to be good for business, good for the
employees, or good for the bottom line.
46 Worksite Analysis
Worksite Analysis
47
Team approach
Management/Safety Manager
Line Supervisor/Forman
Employees
Why?
Worksite Analysis
48
Information
Recordkeeping
Accident & Near Miss Investigations
Checklists (see handout package)
Walkthrough
Personal knowledge
Future plans
Within each hazardous area there may be one or many tasks or jobs
going on pick one at a time and analyze:
Individual steps
Hazards with each step
Where can something go wrong?
MAKE TOAST
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Hazards Recommended Action or Procedure
Worksite Analysis
Job/Task Hazard Analysis
MAKE TOAST
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Hazards Recommended Action or Procedure
1. Prepare toaster
9. Remove toast
MAKE TOAST
Sequence of Basic Job Steps Potential Hazards Recommended Action or Procedure
1. Prepare toaster 1. Toaster is not readily accessible
Teams
Safety
Supervisor
Employee
Handout package
Exercise
Worksite Analysis
Job/Task Hazard Analysis
57