Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Programming:
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Mathematical Specification:
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Pere J. Ferrando
DETAILS OF ANALYSIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVES
Muthn, B., & Kaplan D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor
analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189.
Muthn, B., & Kaplan D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor
analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British
Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19-30.
Variable 1
Value Freq
|
0 59 | ******************
1 130 | ****************************************
2 59 | ******************
3 64 | *******************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 32.5 65.0 97.5 130.0
Variable 2
Value Freq
|
0 51 | **************
1 142 | ****************************************
2 64 | ******************
3 55 | ***************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 35.5 71.0 106.5 142.0
Variable 3
Value Freq
|
0 63 | *************************
1 98 | ****************************************
2 61 | ************************
3 90 | ************************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 24.5 49.0 73.5 98.0
Variable 4
Value Freq
|
0 36 | ***********
1 130 | ****************************************
2 64 | *******************
3 82 | *************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 32.5 65.0 97.5 130.0
Variable 5
Value Freq
|
0 81 | **************************************
1 84 | ****************************************
2 70 | *********************************
3 77 | ************************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 21.0 42.0 63.0 84.0
Variable 6
Value Freq
|
0 78 | ****************************
1 108 | ****************************************
2 52 | *******************
3 74 | ***************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 27.0 54.0 81.0 108.0
Variable 7
Value Freq
|
0 108 | ***************************************
1 109 | ****************************************
2 50 | ******************
3 45 | ****************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 27.3 54.5 81.8 109.0
Variable 8
Value Freq
|
0 146 | ****************************************
1 84 | ***********************
2 49 | *************
3 33 | *********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 36.5 73.0 109.5 146.0
Variable 9
Value Freq
|
0 190 | ****************************************
1 78 | ****************
2 21 | ****
3 23 | ****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 47.5 95.0 142.5 190.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVES
Coefficient Statistic df
P
** Significant at 0.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9
V 1 1.000
V 2 0.752 1.000
V 3 0.550 0.583 1.000
V 4 0.625 0.617 0.614 1.000
V 5 0.527 0.555 0.501 0.644 1.000
V 6 0.659 0.745 0.505 0.554 0.636 1.000
V 7 0.521 0.544 0.441 0.480 0.444 0.523 1.000
V 8 0.448 0.417 0.563 0.441 0.501 0.505 0.519 1.000
V 9 0.526 0.533 0.447 0.362 0.366 0.600 0.393 0.434
1.000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation details:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variable Eigenvalue
1 4.899063915
2 0.626483195
3 0.248847184
4 0.105579188
5 0.030509957
6 -0.013862002
7 -0.028297050
8 -0.165936401
9 -0.176824053
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variable F 1 F 2
V 1 0.000 ---
V 2 0.000 ---
V 3 --- 0.000
V 4 0.000 ---
V 5 0.000 0.000
V 6 0.000 ---
V 7 --- 0.000
V 8 --- 0.000
V 9 0.000 0.000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variable F 1 F 2
V 1 -0.089 0.888
V 2 -0.195 1.016
V 3 0.271 0.495
V 4 0.057 0.704
V 5 0.163 0.583
V 6 0.011 0.821
V 7 0.237 0.460
V 8 1.147 -0.227
V 9 0.099 0.540
Variable F 1 F 2
V 1 0.888
V 2 1.016
V 3 0.495
V 4 0.704
V 5 0.583
V 6 0.821
V 7 0.460
V 8 1.147
V 9 0.540
1 1.462 0.992
2 4.063 0.926
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor F 1 F 2
F 1 1.000
F 2 0.717 1.000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STRUCTURE MATRIX
Variable F 1 F 2
V 1 0.548 0.825
V 2 0.533 0.876
V 3 0.626 0.690
V 4 0.562 0.745
V 5 0.582 0.700
V 6 0.600 0.829
V 7 0.567 0.630
V 8 0.984 0.595
V 9 0.486 0.611
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: The GLB and Omega can only be trusted in large samples, preferably 1,000
cases or more,
due to a positive sampling bias (ten Berge & Socan, 2004).
ASSOCIATED COMMUNALITIES
Variable Communality
V 1 0.713226
V 2 0.911391
V 3 0.695424
V 4 0.832466
V 5 0.677271
V 6 0.856386
V 7 0.520025
V 8 0.764627
V 9 0.564148
The greatest lower bound (glb) to reliability represents the smallest reliability
possible
given observed covariance matrix under the restriction that the sum of error
variances
is maximized for errors that correlate 0 with other variables (Ten Berge, Snijders,
& Zegers, 1981).
Omega can be interpreted as the square of the correlation between the scale score
and the latent
variable common to all the indicators in the infinite universe of indicators of
which the scale
indicators are a subset (McDonald, 1999, page 89).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUALS
Number of Residuals = 36
Value Freq
|
-0.0957 1 | **
-0.0602 5 | **********
-0.0247 6 | ************
0.0108 20 | ****************************************
0.0463 1 | **
0.0818 2 | ****
0.1173 1 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
-1 | 7221
-0 | 88654431111
0 | 00111111222233345
1 | 066
2 | 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor
analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Van Ginkel, J. R. (2015). Multiple Imputation of missing values
in exploratory factor analysis of multidimensional scales : estimating latent trait
scores.Anales, in press.
McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Mardia, K. V. (1970), Measures of multivariate skewnees and kurtosis with
applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3 Item analysis and test scoring with
binary logistic models. Mooresville: Scientific Software.
Ten Berge, J.M.F., Snijders, T.A.B. & Zegers, F.E. (1981). Computational aspects of
the greatest lower bound to reliability and constrained minimum trace factor
analysis. Psychometrika, 46, 201-213.
Ten Berge, J.M.F., & Socan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability
of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69, 613-625.
Woodhouse, B. & Jackson, P.H. (1977). Lower bounds to the reliability of the total
score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: II. A search procedure to locate
the greatest lower bound. Psychometrika, 42, 579-591.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FACTOR completed