Professional Documents
Culture Documents
G. R. King
M. H. Smith
Outdoor Unit
Liquid Line
Hot Gas
Cold Gas
Technical Note TN 10/97
G. R. King
M. H. Smith
ISBN 0 86022 465 1 Printed by Oakdale Printing Co BSRIA 77910 November 1997
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BSRIA would like to thank the following sponsors for their contribution
which has led to the production of this Technical Note:
The research project was undertaken under the guidance of a project steering
group drawn from industry representatives and BSRIA staff. The Steering
Group contributors were:
Contributing from BSRIA were: Mike Smith, Greg King, George Kalanzi,
Richard Newman.
Every opportunity has been taken to incorporate the Views of the editorial
panel, but final editorial control of this document rests with BSRIA.
PREFACE
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1
5 VRF UK PERFORMANCE........................................................................................................ 10
6 PROBLEMS TO AVOID........................................................................................................12
8 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................15
9 COMMENTS.............................................................................................................................. 16
10 FURTHER READING................................................................................................................ 17
FIGURES
CHARTS
PHOTOS
1 INTRODUCTION
The test facility consisted of six separately zoned loads which were used
to imitate a moderate northern European office environment. With the
load applied (heating or cooling), the power consumption and the actual
amount of useful delivered energy produced was recorded. At the same
time, the outdoor unit was subjected to typical UK weather conditions.
When the climatic and piping correction figures arc accounted for. and an
allowance made for system operation, eg defrosting in heating mode, the
realisable system performance may be up to 25% below the nominal
capacity.
BSRIA TN 10/97
3 BASIC VRF SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS
cooling only
heating or cooling
simultaneous heating and cooling (often referred to as heat recovery
systems).
The pipework configuration is different for each type. For cooling only
and cooling and heating configuration it is analogous to a conventional
split type DX air conditioning system but with multiple room terminal
units and pipe work in a parallel or "ladder" configuration (Figure 2).
Outdoor Unit
Figure 2
Cooling Only and Heating
or Cooling
Liquid Line
Hot Gas
Outdoor Unit
Figure 3
Simultaneous Heating
and Cooling
Liquid Line
Hot Gas
Cold Gas
Heat
Figure 4 Exchanger
Simultaneous Heating and Compressors
Cooling System in Cooling
Mode
VRF Indoor Unit
Fan Fan
Heat
Intake
Figure 5
Simultaneous Heating and
Cooling Systems in Heating
Mode
Compressors
Heat
Exchanger
VRF Indoor Unit
Heat
Liquid Line Rejection
Hot Gas
Cold Gas
3. Cutting - all copper pipes should be cut using a sharp pipe slice.
The ends of the pipework must be cleaned and reamed out to the
original internal diameter before brazing. Hacksaws must not be
used.
4. Flushing - when all the site joints have been made. but immediately
before connecting to the system components, high pressure nitrogen
(OFN) is flushed through the pipe, This may remove oxidation
bubbles formed inside copper pipes if nitrogen purging is insufficient
during brazing. It also removes moisture and debris and it can be
used to make sure no liquid- and gas-pipes have been incorrectly
connected.
In the BSRIA Test Facility, the system was loaded by varying the number
of fully loaded room terminal (Indoor) units in use. This method of
testing produced seven load conditions from 25% (2.5 hp) to 114%
(11.4 hp) of the system nominal output.
35. 3.5
30, 3.0
25' 2.5
20 2.0
Load(kW)
COP
15 1.5
10 1.0
5 0.5
0 0.0
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
Capacity (%)
35 3.5
30 3.0
25 2.5
Load (kW)
20 2.0
COP
15 1.5
10 1.0
5 0.5
0 . 0.0
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
Capacity (%)
Chart 3 Installed VRF system performance in 114% simultaneous heating and cooling mode
35 3.5
30 3.0
25 2.5
Load (kW)
20 2.0
COP
15 1.5
10 1.0
5 0.5
0 0.0
Heating Capacity (%) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
(Cooling Capacity (%)) (120%) (89%) (82%) (64%) (57%) (50%) (25%) (0%)
Typically, VRF systems should only have two maintenance visits per year
as part of a manufacturer's warranty agreement. This would entail a
thorough refrigerant leak check, cleaning of all air filters and outdoor
heat exchanger surfaces. Also a diagnostic check of the control system
history of faults (recorded by the microprocessor systems).
Photo 1
Example of an incorrectly
made pipe joint
Photo 3
Example of an incorrectly
made pipe joint
This is a poor joint; the black speckling on the inside of the pipe is
copper oxides generated when bronzing without oxygen-free nitrogen
purging. The swaging has been done incorrectly and bronze filler
material penetration is very poor.
The hour by hour thermal loads in each zone were summated arid
processed into data packages that were comparable with the averaged
measured performance data. This allowed calculations to be performed
that indicated the number of running hours in each of the three operating
modes and the number of kilowatt hours of delivered thermal energy.
This in turn allowed an estimate of the amount of electricity used and
hence operating cost. Based on an electricity supply cost of 0.05/kWhr.
the average cost per kilowatt hour of delivered thermal energy was
0.0212. Alternatively. this could be expressed as 1.32/m2/year for the
model (there was a need for additional healing in the model that is not
included in this cost) or as 16.37 kg CO2/m2/year (assumes 0.62 kg CO2/
kW hr) .
A major conclusion call be drawn from this model: since, in the UK,
weather patterns tend towards a predominant heating requirement, if parrs
of a building have a consistent year round cooling load. this type of
equipment can take maximum advantage of this to considerably offset the
heating required and hence optimise operating energy usage and costs.
A further conclusion based solely upon the model is that these systems
have an advantage in their ability to respond to demands for heating and
cooling with minimal distribution system losses. This is compared with a
four pipe fan coil system where the boiler and chiller must both be at
operating temperature with pumps running and water circulating etc for
all operating hours to be able to respond in the same way. The extent of
this advantage cannot be staled as there is no comparable system
performance operating data.
The total system COPS compare very well with those of similar site-
based chiller performance measurements (which did not include
distribution pumping power and fan coil fan power, BSRIA Technical
Appraisal 1/93).
1. BS 4434 : 1995. Specification for safety and environmental aspects in the design, construction
and installation of refrigerating appliances and systems. BSI.
2. Code of practice for the minimisation of refrigerant emissions from refrigerating systems.
Institute of Refrigeration. 1995.
3. Safety code for refrigerating systems utilising chlorofluorocarbons Part I - Design &
construction. Institute of Refrigeration. 1984. ISBN 09504317 37.
7. HOLMES M J., ADAMS S. Coincidence of dry and wet bulb temperatures. TN 2/77. BSRIA
1977. ISBN 0 86022 042 7.
8. Heat rejection systems - some methods and their operating costs. TA 1/93. BSRIA 1993.
ISBN 086022 337 X
Founded over 40 years ago, BSRIA now has a staff of 120 and
operates from two well equipped laboratories and office premises in
Bracknell and Crowthorne. As a member-based organisation we also
provide a focus for cooperative research. offering a partnership
between industry and government.