Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8120
58
e 50
70
78
120
2020
2020
2020
20 20
20
6 No.81
No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 7
CECI News
20
70
CECI
PC 286
I-Deas
SUN
80%20%
Autocad
R10
Autocad I-deas
58
ISO
1
ISO 9001
1969/8/1
CAD/CAM
10 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 11
1
INTERVIEW
1970/8/4
12 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 13
1
INTERVIEW
92
5 60
20
1/500,000
1970/8/4
73
14 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 15
1
INTERVIEW
781
CAD
EagleCAD
e
90
20
20
1971/7/1
6263
30331 68
52
57
76
53
76
84
3 8790
63
93
60
30
1
1971/9/9
609
32
~
66
18 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 19
1
INTERVIEW
800
Try
!
top downbottom up
1971/9/24
65
ProposalReport
20 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 21
1
INTERVIEW
(626)(
( )(6428)
8120 ()
(691015)
(699)
752( (
)( )
769 (95
(781) ( 11961231)
() (
(81) 1
97125
1971/11/29
() 12) )
(764) (855) 88
(891 70(954
1901231) 30)
581122 20
69912
22 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 23
1
INTERVIEW
1972/4/1
24 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 25
1
INTERVIEW
45 200
61
87
30
20
15
30
1972/6/12
1973/3/12
20
80
551
35
96
1
6259012
2884
1973/5/1
130
3520
30 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 31
1
INTERVIEW
91454
55
(58
91454
()
921SARS
62
DCICECIAssist Resident Engineer
--35
1974/1/7
8792
9049
88104460(8810
9210)44
32 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 33
1
INTERVIEW
Finsterwalder(
Severinsbrcke1960
LeonhardtStrabag
Dywidag
DywidagGerstwagen
Rabcewicz
Beton- und
StahlbetonbauStahlbau
1)
ke(196
ln Sev erinsbrc
K
1976/7/20
() () ()
34 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 35
1
INTERVIEW
7
68
1-1
1979/5/2
9610
E708-3E708-4
36 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 37
1
INTERVIEW
2004
2005
Q & A
1979
20074
1979/9/1
2008
74
() () ()
CECI
1985/8/5
CECI
CECI
96
40 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 41
1
INTERVIEW
1986/6/20
()
42 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 43
1
INTERVIEW
78
70
90
1988/12/16
44 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 45
1
INTERVIEW
(58)
10
() ()
4,000
1
4,000
1990/10/1
921
4,000
921
921
(58)
10
() ()
4,000
1
4,000
1990/10/1
921
4,000
921
921
CECI 21
9212
781
25148(8910
(49/90.2~69
/95.1)
70
70(954)
(International Serial Data System-ISDS
1
Internation Centre)(
1988/3/11
95 95430
International Standard Serial Number
ISSN)
ISSN 1818-4464
!!
SUMMARY
40
CL700A~
1 2
40
2
58
state of art
31
15707
50183km
1
N
0~20W/10~25E
2
4
2km
4km
PLAXISSTAAD
1 2213.5 IVV
300 40cmIIIII
154 30cm
c
16.6 f c 245kg / cm 2 56
IIIIIII
10~2020.4 3
5III18
11.4
700A~
2 2
3
~1
5
921
9.0m
663m
3.25m0.25m
1700m 6
4.6m1.0m2.0m
640m
52 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 53
1.64km
UDEC4
21
24.7
12m73m
10m
0~60m
8
10663m
0~60m
1%
78
300m105mm
RQD25
4.5m
9
93 9
10.6m6.8m
VVI
1426m108m2
93
20
7~11
2 2
58
(1)
(2)
CL302
(3)
(4)
7 CL302
RC
54 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 55
(NATM)
94
RC- ABAQUS3D 93
35m10
97
12
20
RC CL700A
2
65.6m
10 RC
22.4m 4968m
(24m)
68
60m
(GL-1.0m~GL-
12
2.5m)13
11 ABCD
2 2
50m
CL302
CL303 2.4m
#43
22.4m24m11
#43
68 13 700A
1.5m
30m()
1.2m
56 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 57
3.0%5.6m
14
\ +
1718
19
96
14
17
8910
2
~~345kV
#1
881.56km
1516 19
18
2
2
20
15 ()
4.8m6.0m32.9m
7
9610
16 (O47)
20 ~~345kV
16 ()
58 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 59
5.2m FRP()
1.56km#13.5m
3m
FRP(Fiber Reinforced Plastic)
22
FRP
24
GL.- #1
2~GL.-5m 24m
2112~18m 1.2m42m
2.4m1.85m
8
23
245.93m
()
R=50m
4.7
25
50cm
21 ~~
50cm39cm11cm
2 2
23
25
22 FRP
60 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 61
7.(2008)
724
1.4cm5cm
11000
8.9cm10cm
3.2cm1cm#2
PVC
FRP
5.93m
R=50m
4.7
1.(1998)
#2
2.(20032004
2006)
2 2
3.(2004)
~12004
408~415
88
ANASYS 4.(2004)CL302
5.(2007)
CL700A
6.(2008)
97
13~23
62 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 63
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
20073.52TEU(
71.0%)3.04TEU(61.3%)
20133.4
1
64 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 65
(SPCWT) 1
Haifa(Israel)
100% Gothenburg(Sweden)
Burban(South Africa)
Shuwaikh(Kuwait)
Oakland Container
(Global operator)
Terminal,(USA)
ECT(Rotterdam)
Port2000,LeHavre(France)
() Santos Brasil(Brazil)
LaemChabang International
() BOT Terminal, (Thailand)
JNPT(India)
Teeport(UK)
() 100% Liverpool(UK)
Annual Review of Global Container
Terminal Operators-2008,Drewry Shipping Consultants
Ltd.
2
(Terminal operator)
1. 1.
() 2. 2.
100% 3. 3.
100%
4. 4.
1
()
()(
2
)
BOT
PSA20056
2 2
SIPG
(
1992 (Global operator)
)
(
19938(HIT) )
(SCT)
1998
(SPC) 2 Drewry
2
(SPC)(SCT)
66 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 67
2007
4.09 50.7%Drewry
TEU(82.5%) 2007~2013
5
(
)
4
199342%2007 TEU
() 17.5%
Drewry(3)
2007
56.4%
2 (Global operators)
201358.2%
(Global
operators)
Drewry,Sep.2008
5
TEU
Drewry
(Public
sector)(Other private
Drewry2007
sector)
3.52TEU(
(Global
71.0%)20062007
operators)Drewry Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd,2008,
2 2
3 (1996-2007)
4
1996-2007 Drewry,Sep.2008
APM Terminals(
3
2Maersk)Cosco (5
2001 3 2004-2010
Cosco Container Lines) MSC(6
2013
) Evergreen(8
0.65 3.4
)
TEU ()
(Terminal
(Global operatorsOther private
operators)42007
sector)
Annual Review of Global Container Terminal Operators- 2008 3.04TEU61.3%(
(Global Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.
60.8%)
operators)
68 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 69
2007 6 (2007)
50.7%
Drewry Drewry
20027,780.4TEU2007 2007
12,216.0TEU5
Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd,2008,
1.57( 656
4)2007 (
Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd,2008,
()()
4 2007
2007
2,827.0TEU51.76 )
4.09TEU(
2 2
1,435.0TEU5
82.5%)
1.65
5 (2007)
1,337.0TEU52.28 5HPHCOSCO
PSA
DP World
(Global operators)
APM Terminals
(
)
2 2
(Terminal operators)
2007
(Global operators)
72 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 73
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
1
2
3
4
1 2 3 4
6783
590
8.9%5
74 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 75
524 94-9618
17.7%12 (2) 78.15 cms62
267.93 cms
2001.5 m
1001.0 m
500.8 m
131,23196109,141
948
951
(1)
272 3
2,900
mm 4,500 mm
54096
519.810
96.3%
2
2
3 4
1
59
2180
1,869 cms(96)
4
76 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 77
911(2004)0605(2007)(2007)
(2008)
78.8mm/hr
XP-SWMM
78.8mm/hr 5
2 6Qp
Q0Q1
() mm/hr
Q2
109.5 105 93.5 84.5
(2001) (*) (*) (*) (*) Q3
97 38.5 36.5 36.5
78.8mm/hr5%10% (2004) (*) (*) (*) (*)
10%20% 911 160.5 62.5 59.5 54
(2004) (*) (*) (*) (*)
0605 96.5 89 71.1 69.5
(2007) (**) (**) (*) (*)
() 81 79 77 72
(2007) (**) (*) (**) (*)
7
106 87.5 78.5 69
(2008) (*) (*) (*) (*)
() ***
1
C ()
78.8mm/hr20%
0.91.0C 94.56mm/hr(95mm/hr)
20 5
C1.1~1.2
1 ()
1020
8
(1990)
(2004) (2000) (2006)
20%
0.85-0.95
2 2
()
0.9-1.0 1.0 1.0 78.8mm/hr
0.70-0.73(0.83) 0.9-1.0 1.0 0.9 95mm/hr(8)
0.66-0.89(0.79) 0.9 1.0 0.8
20%
0.56-0.78(0.67) - - 0.65
6
0.3-0.5(0.38) 0.4-0.5 - 0.45
0.55-0.75(0.60) 0.3 - -
1.(5)78.8mm/hr 1.
() (1)
() 2.(10)87mm/hr
(10%) (2)
7
2(2001)(2004) 3.(20)95mm/hr
20%()
(20%)
78 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 79
(3) 4. 14.5%
3 6.75CMS
910
2. 2.961 ()
(1)27.08ha 13.768mm/hr
(2) 5.148mm/hr 11
7 (8) 20%78.8mm/hr
95mm/hr(12) 11
420m3/ha 7
(3) (7)
1,800m3 XP-SWMM
1.
3 8.07CMS (1)
9.39CMS(95mm/hr) CN
mm/5min % CMS % 14.1% (2)
(95mm/hr) 15.90 9.39
8.03CMS
15.47 2.70 8.07 14.1
(3)
15.90 8.03 14.5
(4)
+ 15.47 2.70 6.75 28.0
2.
3. (1)749.8ha
(1) (2)89.77%(
673.10ha
76.7ha) 12 20%
(2)
( (3)
4
2 2
8)
9
(3) 7.9m3/ha
1 2 3 4 5
XP-SWMM (4)
6 180 370 35,000 3,200 6,000
(4)7 (m3)
227m 3 /
ha 3.
(5)XP-SWMM
(5)45 (1)
(6)123 SCS(CN)(C
(6)XP-
4 )
SWMM
(2)
10 (13)
80 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 81
XP-SWMM
50.52CMS
3.8% 3.-
6
924
XP-SWMM
4.-
47.12CMS10.26%
925
40.55CMS
5.-
22.78%
5 945
13
6.-
mm/5min (%) CMS (%
(3) 945
15.90 52.51
XP-SWMM
7.
15.90 50.82 3.2
() 805
(4)6
( 15.61 1.8 50.52 3.8 8.
) 9310
(5)
15.90 47.12 10.26
9.
15.90 40.55 22.78 946
XP-SWMM
(6)XP-SWMM
++ 15.90()
1.8 37.75 28.11 10.
15.61()
9312
11.-
9312
12.
[]2001
4. 13.
51415 []
AD 2001
2 2
CN83 14.
14
77C=0.60 ()2001
SUMMARY
1 2 3
921
2001721
20047 2
820048
7
1
(3)
1.
RC
(1)19951
1
2 2
(
0.33g )
(4)
4
RC
(2) 3(5
8) [5]
(5)
(3)
GPS
2
86 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 87
RC
5 (1) 10 (2) 13 (1)
2001520023
3(9
12)[6]
634.5
6 (2) 16 14 (2)
11
I
2.0
13
2.0855
RC8
162.4
7
7 14 12 15
1.5mRC
3(13
20013
16) [7]
2 2
9225m
19475m
37.5m+3@50m+45m=232.5m
8 I8 16
2.2m2.38mP19P20
149(1720)
[8]
9 (1) 1.15m
12
161.5mRC
200012
564.630
88 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 89
3.
40
4.
20
160
220I 5.
20
(30m+40m+70m+45m+35m) 22
P1P4
91.5mRCP2P3
121.5mRC 6
[11,12]
200012
1.
(1)
(2) 7.
(3)
(1)(2)
(3) 200121
2.
[10,13]
17 (1)
21
3.
22
2 2
[9,10] 23
18 (2)
[11,12]
1.
2.
4.6
21
(23)
19
90 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 91
2.
70m+90m+70m=230m
24 20073
(27)
28
25
()20048
[10,14]
27
() 20048
[10,14]
29
1. () 20047
[14]
250m
70+3@92+70=416m 1.
2.43.7m
RC25m(24)
1.
2.
8
400m 8
1.
82+3@100+82= 464m 7
2 2
2.64.0m 8
RC40m(24) 100(26) 27030
8
150(28)
3.
2. 2.
200m
80+110+100+70 155
= 360m2.64.0m (29)
RC18m(
25)
26 30
92 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 93
2. 2~5
1993
[4]2001
() 560m
50+75+50=175m(31) () (
P38~P50
) 5m
P38~P5010m
( 32
P38~P5619
() )
() ()
31
()
()
() 32
()
[15]
2 2
1[16]
()
33
19942
3,030mI
1
13m26m35m
19
5I
4.1m2.1m
7m12.4m2m
[16]
() 10.5m60cm
28mPC
94 No.81 January, 2009 34 No.81 January, 2009 95
()(3334)
1.5 ()(3940)
5
()(35)
36
41
39
37
()(38) 42
35
()(36
37) 40
2 2
()(4142)
43
()(43)
14
3
38
44
10.
1.921 200611
20008
11.
2.
19952 1999
2 2
45 3. 12.
200812 2002
4.921 13.
20008 2002
5. 921 14.
20008 2004
98 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 99
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
(1)(2)(3)
4
1 2 3 4
(1)(2)
(3)
2
[1]
53m5m20m
29
100 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 101
1 2 5 6
3 4 7
100+160+100=360m
83
(1)
138m33m
85 2.0~3.2m
(3) 1.1m
()
134m27m
100180100380m2.4
()
89 17.58m
(5) 97
(7)
1.8~3.0m
2 1.0m
30
2
470134
83
13470408m
(2)
18m 9418794375m3.0
87 19.8m
(
(4) 48K+800~66K+850)
(
) 130m
95
750m (6) 20m
102 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 103
10
[2]
9(Strut-and-Tie Model)
12
11
180m
18m20m
20m2m2.4m ()
13.1m
3.44m2.53m
20 m CEB-FIP 1990
2.4m4.9m (Aging Coefficient
8 Method)(Step-by-Step Method)
12
[3][4]
2 2
()[5][6] [7]
1011 180m
8
()
hyperbolic sin
(
(Strut-and-Tie)9 CQC)
(
)
90%
104 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 105
() 14
1
0.4431
0.8111
14
0.71713
53.5m
15 ()
16
10.443
15
16
10.811
1. 2. 3. 4.
2 2
10.717
13
5. 6. 7. 8.
9. 10. 11. 12.
15 17
106 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 107
2;
3;
18
60
4;
21
941971
1
24
2
17 3 22
19
18
2324
1. "
"21
20029
2. " PC
"
20 20087
1
3. A.M. Neville, W. D. Dilger and J. J. Brooks,
Creep of plain and structural concrete(1969)
4. STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF TIME-DEPENDENT
2 2
2
() Switzerland(1972)
3
23 5.
(19952000)
6. Mario Paz,Structural Dynamics Theory and
Computation(1985)
1920 2122 7.
(1996)
108 No.81 January, 2009 24 No.81 January, 2009 109
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
CECI
1
2
4
1 2 3 4
921
88921
2
CECI
REA
multi-disciplinary
GPS
110 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 111
()
(88
)(93)5
(-
2 )
19.812.7
63.9%3.115.8% 22.1
420.3% 2119.6
1
2 2
1314
1012
(
4
1
112 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 113
1
0+575-0+615 E1
0+795 T1A
1+240 T1 1+240
1+820-1+900 H1 50
2+400-2+940
3+455 T3 1.5 3+45520
REA 3+950-4+210 H2 3+950-4+210 4+075
(2)
4+311-4+572 H3 4+500500
()4
89
92
3 4 5
(REA)
(3)
(4)
(
2
2 2
)
(
5)
Rapid
Ecological AssessmentREA
REA
(
)
1
114 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 115
3015
IBA
(6)
9
(6K+2007K+200)
(
7)
(12K+40013K+100)
13K+100
(
8) 10
(9)
2 2
500
(10)
8
18
(4K+500)
96(7) 7
(11)
116 No.81 January, 2009 3 No.81 January, 2009 117
Top 6.2003
11 Down
(13)
7.2004
2004.4
V255P5-11
! 8.2005
9.
2005
12
10.
2005
()
1.2004 11.Hans Lorenz1970
()
2.2006
13 12.1999
( 0+5750+615)
2 2
3.1999 13.1999pocket
book
(12)
4.2005 14.2006
2006
5.2004 15.2006
(4+6704+850) 2006
118 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 119
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
9512
(17.2)
94
1 2 3
905(
)
()88
78
2
89118 911220
922
2198
925
92223
95121
3610
90912 1,796,700,000
45 1,637,000,000
3.
()
3
1
1.
() ()
() 2.
(895
UK394+315 21
) 3.
()(
UK397+60029 1.
91430)
4.
2 2
26.07(1)
2
3140
(4)
35,100
()
()
() ()
(23) ()
() 9.64 ()
2.
()() 60%120%
122 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 123
8.20M
9.
()
1.G+1(5)
R16
4
(1)
()
(2) 6 G+2
() (3)25
(4)R16
1.182 M59
M
2.114 M420
970
3.330 M
9.4 M 2.G+2(6)
4.
5. 35111 m2
6. 62095 m2
7.
18M 7 G+3
2
2
3. G+3 (7)
5 G+1
124 No.81 January, 2009 8 G+4 No.81 January, 2009 125
4.G+4(8)
9
()9
1.(G+1)
R16
2.(G+2)R16
R16
13
()10
G+218
10
()11
G+2
14
()12
11
2 2
(
)
13~23 15
12 16
126 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 127
17 21
24
24~25
18 22
()
()R16
25
(26~33)
2 2
19 23
1F-3F PH-PK Line
93.05.27 ()
1F-3F ABC Line
DECK1F-3F PH-PK
Line DECK
()
()
1F-3F ABC Line
20
128 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 129
26 A-C Line 29 C-F 1-19 Line DECK 32
1-3F
27 D-F Line 30 33
2 2
1.--
(9354)
2.--
(936
15)
28 31
A-C Line G+1-G+3
SUMMARY
1 2
1
Z()
1 (2a) 12.5m 3 4 ZdB1/3
()
1~100Hz
RMS Velocity (dB, ref. 1 micro-in/sec)
90
80
70 (fn=nV/L)
60
[2]
50
40
30
Z-direction
fn = n V/L------------------------------------------(1)
20
2 2
10
0
(2b)200m fn =n(order) 5 ZFFT
1 1.6 2.5 4 6.3 10 16 25 40 63 100
1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency (Hz) n=(1,2,3,.)
2 (
12.5m200m300km/hr) V=
1 (
L=
300km/hr)
(1)
(structural criteria)
(physiological criteria)
(production-quality
3[1]
2 criteria)
1/344 16
3
134 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 135
1[3]
1
2
/
()
fu (Voltage
E x fc S x f df -------(4)
400 fl Sensitivity)10V/g
VC-A 50 8 fu f l 0.5g(pk)
f c
10003 ANSIS1.6-1984
VC-B 25 3 (
1/3
)
1
VC-C 12.5 1
() 'f i fu fl
1/3
x(t)(RMS) V x fc () ()
TEMs SEMs
one - third octave band
VC-D 6 0.3 E-Beam
dBdB V x fc E x fc --------(5)
VC-E 3 0.1
() f c
16
Qm 10
6
in/sec
dB 20 log 10 ------------------------(2)
Q ref RMS(Lv)
dynamic signal processor
1.1/38-100 Hz (dB10-6 in/sec) V x fc
v m v ref Lv dB 20 log10 3
2.
v ref
6
10 in / sec 10 6 ---------(6) 16
(48163264
)(
0.1~10kHz)
(
(RMS) )
1/3RMSdB [4] 512Hz
()
() bandfilter
2 2
x(t)816 1/3(
1100Hz21)
Sx(f)
2 X f 2 ()
Sxf --------------(3)
T
6 [3] (Linear
X f x(t)f Average)
Tx(t)
() 1~100Hz
136 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 137
(
( 9 LS-ALS-B)
)
() [4]
(
)
8
(
)
( ()
7)
1.Chen, Y.J., Shen, Y.J., Chen, K.Y., and Chang, S.M.
(2008). Some Characteristics of Ground Vibration as
(8) Induced by High-Speed Trains, Geotechnical Earthquake
Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, GSP 181, ASCE.
2 2
Engineering ASCE, 133 (10), 1302-1307.
3.Gordon, C.G. (1991), Generic criteria for vibration
9 [5] sensitive equipment. Optics and Metrology; 1619:71-75.
4.(2002) "
,
5.Chen, Y.-J., Shen, Y.-J., and Chen, K.-Y. (2006) The
() [4] characteristics and measurement scheme for ground
vibration induced by passing train in bridge structures,
Inter-Noise 2006.
138 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 139
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
1 2
(TCS)
()(Traffic Control System,
TCS)
() /
/
)
()
300~350km/hr6
4(-0.9m/
s2-1.3m/s2) 1
3 (COMTRAC)
2 2
2
(Operation Control
Center; OCC)
(Fail-
Safe)
3
1
CTC
CTC
CTC
CTC
2 CTC
4CTC
CTCCTC
CTC
(Computer aided Traffic Control, COMTRAC)
(Man-Machine
Advanced Processor, MAP)
(Programmed
Route Control, PRC)
4 CTC
(Automatic Route Setting, ARS)
2
(Electronic Data Processing
4 2
3
Computer, EDP)
(Supervisory
CTC
Control and Data Acquisition, SCADA) CTC
(Operation Control Center;
OCC)
CTC
6
19753~
19818
19822
6
19852
5 - CTC()(TCS)
-5 24 1964~CTC
-
(1964
1.1920030.1)
19723 CTC
2 2
()
1961
(OCC)
1969 (//
OCC
(Computer aided Traffic Control, COMTRAC) )
19723~
(COMTRAC)
()(Traffic Control System, TCS)
146 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 147
()
(
)
(CEDS)
(N
)(R) ()
(H)(I)
(L) (OCC)(UC)
8 (SCR)(DCR)
(TDRD)
()
8
7
()
(ARS)(TDS) (ADS)
(ADS) (ARS)(CFS)
(TLMS)
7
1.
(Non-ARS)
()
(Train Describer System,
TDS)
2 2
1.
TDS A.
( TD (transfer track)
2.
)
ARS
()
(PIS) B.
(ARS)
(ATC)
(Signaling Telemetry System)
C.ARS
(MMIS)
148 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 149
(CFS) ()
(CEDS)
()(Current Timetable)
2. ()
ARS () (24)
(TDRD)
ARS
(ADS)
(CFS) 1
2
(SCADA)
(CEDS) 1
ST A D B E B C B(extra)
Taipei Dep. 18:00:00 18:03:30 18:19:45 18:23:15 18:40:00 18:51:30 18:55:00
Panchiao Arri. 18:05:15 18:10:00 18:26:15 18:29:45 18:46:30 18:58:00 19:01:30
Dep. 18:05:15 18:12:00 18:28:15 18:31:45 18:48:30 19:00:00 19:07:15
(ARS) Taoyuan Arri. 18:13:45 18:23:15 18:37:15 18:43:00 18:57:30 19:09:00 19:16:15
2 2
5. E P E P E E
10:23.0 10:28.0 10:39.5 10:44.5 10:49.5 11:04.5 11:01.5 11:11.5 11:05.5
10:23.5 10:28.5 10:39.5 10:46.5 10:50.0 11:04.5 11:02.5 11:12.0 11:06.5
10:27.5 10:32.0 10:41.5 10:49.5 10:53.0 11:06.5 11:06.5 11:15.0 11:10.5
10:28.0 10:32.5 10:41.5 10:49.5 10:53.0 11:06.5 11:07.0 11:15.0 11:11.0
10:34.0 10:38.5 10:45.5 10:53.5 10:58.0 11:10.5 11:13.0 11:20.0 11:17.0
10:34.5 10:39.5 10:45.5 10:53.5 10:58.5 11:10.5 11:13.5 11:20.5 11:25.0
10:39.0 10:44.0 10:49.0 10:57.5 11:03.0 11:14.0 11:18.0 11:25.0 11:30.0
9
10:40.0 10:45.0 10:50.0 10:58.5 11:04.0 11:15.0 11:19.0 11:26.0 11:31.0
10:46.0 10:51.0 10:56.0 11:06.0 11:10.0 11:21.0 11:25.0 11:32.0 11:37.0
10:50.0 10:55.0 11:00.0 11:10.0 11:15.0 11:25.0 11:30.0 11:35.0 11:40.0
10:55.0 11:00.0 11:04.0 11:14.0 11:20.0 11:29.0 11:35.0 11:40.0 11:45.0
10:55.5 11:00.5 11:04.0 11:14.0 11:20.5 11:29.0 11:35.5 11:40.5 11:45.5
() 11:01.5 11:06.0 11:09.0 11:19.5 11:26.5 11:34.0 11:41.5 11:47.0 11:51.5
11:02.5 11:14.5 11:11.5 11:21.0 11:27.5 11:36.0 11:42.5 11:48.0 11:53.0
150 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 151
(ARS)
(Train List Management
System, TLMS) ())
(ARS)() (/
(TCS) )
(MMIS)(CFS)
1.
(ARS) CTC
88
/(
3)
2.JR
(White Period)
1997
Automatic Diagram
3.Tetsuo Takashige, Signalling Systems for Safe
System,ADS)
Railway Transport, Japan Railway & Transport
Review 21, September 1999.
()
4.P.J.N. Bartlett, IECC BR New Generation
signalling Centre, Third Railway signalling and
Telecommunications Course 1993, paper No. 3.2.3.
10
5.A.St. Johnstont, Train Describers and
Associated Systems, Third Railway signalling
and Telecommunications Course 1993, paper No.
3.3.3.
10 6.
91
2
2
7.
85
TDS
(TLMS)
8.
(TDS) (MIS)
(MMIS)
(OMIS)
9.
2005
152 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 153
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
14.8986
12.5
U/
1
2
DB144 3
DB145 4
1 2 3 4
11037
14.812
12.511
83
(B1)
90 B2B3B4
B5B6
4 CP-1
() 6 (FLAC)
CP-1
PC80cm
39m
2
24
2
PC (7)
2
PC
5
CP-1(45) ()
() (76)
PC
(89)
TM-5-855-11986
(3)
156 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 157
10U()
100UU
3D(
)10U
()
11U
11
8
2 UU 12 13
2
906
9 352
1213
14
U
U
U25m 14
16
19
2 2
17
15 20
18
160 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 161
21~31
21 25 29
(B1) (B5) (B9)
986
22 26 30
28
(B2) (B6) (B10)
OR29
2 2
23 27 31
(B3) (B7) (B11)
BL18
24 28
(B4) (B8)
162 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 163
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
1 2
3
95111596
215
48
96
2
25
SPA
9272
93630
9415
2195915
164 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 165
10 1
30
5
100
MEGA 2
COLUMN
2.
5 !!!
!!!
21
!
1.
1
9
1.2
2 2
98
20
30
20
5
92
89812
9
2.
166 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 167
NO
YES
2. NO YES
NO
YES
NO NO
1.
3
1. !
!
3/ !
1. 2. !
1. !
!
2. !
!
1. 2.
3. !
1. !
! 1. 2. ! 2. !
1. ! 1. ! 2.
!
2. ! 2. !
! 1. ! 1. ! 1. !
2. 5 6
2. ! 2. !
3. ! 3. ! !
! 3. !
4
2.
2
2
3.
1.
3 1.
4.
168 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 169
7 8
1
45
8 .
STATNAMIC
1011
9
2
1.
12
2
2. 2
13 10
7
39
2.
170 No.81 January, 2009 11 No.81 January, 2009 171
(3)
()
1. 3.
12 (1) (1)
(2) (2)
(3)
(3)15
16
1FL 2.
(1)
14
DECK
(2)
2 15
2
SPA
FM!,51/31
FM!,46/81
FM!,42/3
FM!,36/3
FM!,31/81
FM!,27/31
FM!,21/31
FM!,6/81
FM!,2/31
FM!.4/71
FM!.9/:1
FM!.23/31
FM!.26/61
2.
6
16
18
1.
2
()
1
3.
3
2.
100%
2
117
15%
5%
3
1.
4
2 2
()
4 18
928
9812
RC
1.
5
17
174 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 175
2. 951125 96
1 1.
1//
2
34
2.
219 12
3
45
Smart-PMIS
!
!
()
0!
! !
!
!
Z!
!
O! QDN
! QDN !
! Z! O!
! !
19
2
2
()
20
20
176 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 177
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
109
145031.2753mm(
150mm)
(CTCI)(IHI)
160,000
1
2
3
1 2 3
160,000LNG
131415 160
160,000LNG BOG(BOIL OFF
GAS COMPRESSOR)BOG
54.3 BOG
300/900/ LNG
2
168/600/ ORV(OPEN RACK VAPORIZERS)
(1)
ORVLNG
LNG
37.2
(PC Wall , Prestressed Concrete Wall)(3)
2 2
2 LNG
(7)
6
8
2 LNG
2
11
7
1450
(
9 A (12)
(53) 8)A(9)
(6) (10)
31.27 (
11)(Center
(Balance Weight)
182 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 183
(13)
(1050mm)
15 17 /
LNG
(Buffer Chamber) ()(
14
)
(15)
1.
31.27 m (2h x 60 min/h)
()
= 26.05 cm/min0.26 m/min0.30 m/
min(o.k)
2.
D2/4 = (78.2)2/4 = 4802.91 4803
() 3.CMM
12
4803 x 0.26 m/min = 1248.78 m3/min
1249 m3/min
150mm
(16) 4.CMM(
35%)
1249 m3/min x 1.35 3 = 562.05m3/min
560 m3/min
()(
)
1.(Pa)
1450 tonc 4803 =301.89kg/
16
=0.0301kg/cm2
2950Pa
2 (
2
2.Pa(
) 2
13
() 20%)
2950Pa x1.2 = 3540Pa
(50%+50%) 3.kw(
(33.3%+33.3%+33.3%) (17) 60%)
(3540 Pa x 560 m3/min) (60 x 1000 x
0.6= 55.07 kw(75 kw)
(Q-P Performance
33.3%50%(Step Control) Curve)
4.kw(
Y-P.F= 0.8)
14
184 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 185
75 kw x 2.5 0.8 = 234.375 kVA(
250 kVA)
()
,
18
1/500 (19)
150mm(D/500) 500 mm
1/3(
100mm300mm
150mm () )
(18)120
(
) 19
(QC)
(QA)
2 2
(LNG) 1.CIRT
180,000 2.CIRT
LNG 3.
4.
3
5.(
)
6.API STD 620 Design and Construction of Large
Welded Low-Pressure Storage Tanks .
SUMMARY
73
11,000
(TIMCCC)
TIMCCCATMS
1
2
3
4
5 1 2 3 4 5
8020
1
731110
()
()
8211
872
1.
(Advanced Traffic Management System,
2 898
ATMS)(Advanced
()
Traveler Information System, ATIS)
130 ()
(Intelligent
81
Transportation System, ITS)
86.5 387325 ()
2 2
814
12 8727 3
(13.9)
6 (210)
2.
26 (
328)1
()
() (273.84)
12K+418
1.
33K+09521
34
3.
()
5
(17)
7
(
43)
()
5
6
()
5(
2 2
)
877966
()
8
5
3
94
(Route Guidence Sign, RGS)
192 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 193
TIMCCC
13
TIMCCC
13
[2]
[3]TIMCCC ()
13
()
8
1.
9
()
13 TIMCCC
962
TIMCCC
9
2. TIMCCC
()
TIMCCC
10 TIMCCC
TIMCCC
()
12
2 2
TIMCCC
10 (Personal Digital Assistant, PDA)
3.CMS ()
()
11 8A 501 R11 R12 F311Z F601C R21 R22 F321Z F537 R31 TIMCCC
1
5 5 6
XML(Extensible Markup
( ( ( ( (
62 76 72 82 Language)
66 6468 78) 74) 8486
) ) 88
)
11 12
194 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 195
() 14
XHTML(Extensible Hyper Text Markup
Language)
TIMCCC
()
14 VICS
OD
1.
(Origin Internet ITSIP(Internet
TIMCCC
Destination, OD) Protocol)15 1985.61~3
TIMCCC
OD
2.
OD
2005.74-99~4-109
3.
2005.73-4~3-5
2 TIMCCC 2
ITS
15 ITS
OD
(Pocket PC) ITS
()
(Navigator)
(Vehicle
Information and Communication System, VICS)
196 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 197
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
97
()
3
1 2 3
Intelligent Information
Integration & Analysis Platform, IIIAP
()() 2
IIIAP
-
IIIAP
IIIAP
5 VD
6 VD
7 CCTV
8 CMS
9 CMS
10
11
1
12 (GPS Data) GPS
13
14
15
16
()
17
() (
2 2
1)
1
() (
)
XMLHTMLTEXTMJPEG
JPG (IIIAP)
() 2
(Synchronized Process)
200 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 201
WEB
ITS
XML
(4)
2
2
5
CMS CMS
3 4
()
5
30
5
ETC VDCMS (Information Processor
VD 5
BUS( Pluggable)
)
2 2
2
()
(Remote
Procedure Call)
SMS
(
()
)
3
202 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 203
()
(Raw
Web
Data) Service
XML (6)Web Service
()
1.
XML
2. (
() 5)
3.
()
OD
6 Web Service
5
2 2
Service
(Time Lag
)OD
XML
()HTTP-XML Web Service
HTTP-XML
CMS
RDS-TMC
HTTP-XML
204 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 205
(Time-Sensitive)
()
()
() XML
2 2
XMLHTML
ATMSATISAPTS
Web ServiceSocketURL RequestRemote
Procedure Call
SUMMARY
2006
2010
20072008
(Spatial Information)(GIS)
4
1 2 3 4
200779
Geographic Information 0960027673
System, GIS
(Spatial Information)
2
2006
2010
1
2008
2009
2008-2010 2007
2008
Urban Area
Rural Area(2)
!
2007
2010
85%
GIS
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9
2
1
1/1000
1 1/5,000
1
20081016
ROAD
RDNODE
ROADA
2 2
HROADA
ROADSP
RAIL
GeoPDF
HSRAIL
RT
ANNORAIL
RIVERA
RIVERL
85% LAKE
COUNTY
2007
2006 TOWN
BLOCK
BUILD
MARK
CONTROL
ORTHO
210 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 211
1. 2. 1. CADGIS
25 1/1000 CAD
(1) 1/5000 GIS GIS
1.25 CAD 45
1/2500 1.25
2.5
(2) 1.25
2.5 2.5
1/5000
2008
2. 2.
25
50 (1)
(2)
()()
2008
NGIS
(3)
1.
1/1000 ()(
(1) 1/5000 )() 4
() GIS ()
() 3
()5 (4)
2 2
A.
1.25
B.
(2)
3.
5
2.5
7.5
3 4. 5
212 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 213
10
5*5 100
IMU 8
5 11
5
7 RC
Digital Elevation Model, DEM 9
2
Inertial Measuring Unit, 2
IMU
Global Positioning System, GPS
7 1 3
6 7 2 3
Direct Geo-referencing 7 3 8 () 10 3
DEM 4
7 4
3
8 5*5
11
2 2
7 ()()()
1.
2.
9
3.
3
3
6 GPSIMU 2008
1/1000
214 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 215
60%
80%
2
12 14
2
GPS
IMU
GIS
85%
13
GPSGIS
14
2 2
12 2-3
20102007
115%8
DEM
2200
238
366
(2200*8/2/3/8=366)
GIS
13
216 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 217
2
SPECIAL REPORT
SUMMARY
WH10-1PC
1 2 3
4@7+2@3+1@=
35
20m
13.1m3.44m~2.53mRC
13.1m2m~2.4mPC
13.1m4.9m~2.8m
2
PC
13.1m4.9m~2.4mPC
12.8m2m12.12m
3@2.5m1m
5m~2.26m
HDPE19
PC
100m+180m+100m=380m
(1,2)
218 No.81 January, 2009 4@IV20 No.81 January, 2009 219
(5)
1 PC
4 WH10-1PC
2 PC
WH10-1 E-206
5 PC
stage1stage24
E-206 WH10-1
(Lc5)
3 PC (Lc6)(Lc10)(Lc4)
(Lc7)(Lc8)
(Lc6)(Lc7)
35 m6M
10M
(1)
1
10M
2
2
(4)
PC
(3)
10M
PC24
220 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 221
6
1+2+3 1
(1) 6
XY
PC 7
4Y0.00136X0.76124
353.3T
18mTB1 (4)
0.92cm R20.9699
7
1.86cm0.92+1.86
TB1 2.78cm 4 (8)
1310cm (3)
2 2 +3+4 5
TB1
2.78/13101/471 < 1/3602
TB1 (2)
TB11
1
TB11
2
(1)(3)
2 2
2
2 +3 3
TB1TB1
3 6
3
1- 3-1 5-2
8
222 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 223
PC P6/P7
PC
4.1cm8.0cm
4.1cm8.0cm
PC = -3.9cm3cm
1313 5
13
STAGE3STAGE6STAGE9
STAGE12
STAGE2STAGE5STAGE8STAGE11 P6 P7
STAGE4
PC
STAGE7STAGE10STAGE13
[1]
STAGE1
9
2
13STAGE4
STAGE7
STAGE10STAGE13
5m
3cm
9 ( ) STAGE16STAGE15
2
PC
STAGE16P6/P7
2
3.1cm
2 6.3cm
PC180M 3.1cm6.3cm= -3.2cm
180M/290MY -3.9cm-3.2cm
(mm)X (11)
(m)10STAGE15
2P6P7
P6P7
90m10
224 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 225
STAGE17 P6/P7
2.7cm
5.7cm2.7cm5.7cm= -3cm
STAGE16 WH10-1PC
-3.2cmSTAGE17 5
-3cm3cm(12)
P6P7
STAGE15STAGE16STAGE17
13 2STAGE17
3
5
11 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-16
AC
AC
10M5M
5M
stage
2
2
1.
7354-63(2007)
12 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-17 13 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-15-16-17
SUMMARY
()2004
(International Rough-
ness IndexIRI)(Pavement Condition IndexPCI)
2005~2008
IRIPCIPMS
1 2
ISTEA)PMS
PMS
PMS
PMS
IRIPCI
(Pavement
Management SystemPMS)20
41PMS1991
(Intermodal Surface ()
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
IRI 1.2.8m/km 4.5m/km 1. 1. 1.
5.98m/km( 2.0m/km 1.1~1.3m/km 1.9m/km
3.
(1) ) 2.
2. 2.
5.5m/km 2.7m/
2.5m/km 1.1m/km
km
(2) 3. 3.
6.5m/km 3.0m/km 1.3~1.8m/km
150
3 IRI650cm/km(3)
PMS1991 *
ISTEAPMS
IRI750 IRI450 450IRI500 IRI500
PMS 650IRI750 IRI400 400IRI450 IRI450
1 (1) *
()
IRI650 IRI320 320IRI350 IRI350
1.
1983-1988
2.
IRI700 IRI350 350IRI380 IRI380
20
1991-1992
IRI700 IRI350 350IRI380 IRI380
1992-1993 1120
ORACLESQL
1993-1994 IRI750 IRI400 400IRI430 IRI430
811
1995-1997
(
PMS1)
1997-1999 GIS
2 2
1998-1999
2007 IRI
1999-2000
IRI
PMMS
2000-2001 PCI
PCI
2001-2002 PCI 1983
IRIPI
2002-2005 IRI
234
2004
PCI
230 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 231
IRI 2005 PCI
IRI
PCI ()
() ()
2006IRI
()
PCI () PCI
IRIPCI
IRI
PCI PCI
() IRI
FAAPCI
()IRI
()
PCI
()IRI
(H)(M)
()5~20m
(L)PCI40
7
()IRI PCI56
7
5 PCI(4)
84
(aintenance) 2007116
PCI
(Rating) (Repair Strategy) 2005728 2005818 200653
2008531
100
85 25,500m 54,000m 19,300m 120,000m
70
- - 72,088m2 -
55
40
IRI 20 IRI 20
2 2
IRI30 IRI50
25 PCI120 ()
6 FAAPCI(4) 1,275,000 2,700,000 965,000 6,000,000
PCI 100m
100m 100m 100mIRI
IRI
(1) 85100 IRI IRI
PCI
(2) 7085
IRI 0.81m/km 2.74m/km 3.6m/km 4.74m/km
(3) 5570
(4) 4055 IRI 6.96m/km 8.00m/km 20.0m/km 19.65m/km
(5) 2540 PCI - - 47 -
(6) 1025
(7) 010 PCI - - 88 -
1.PCI40
2.PCI60PCI70
232 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 233
7IRI25.5km 2004CNS 15046
54.0km19.3km120km 200612IRI PMS
20~50(84 3.(
10) )
PCI72,088m2120 2007
4.
5~6(120km IRI 91200211
) IRI 21
5.
IRI --
IRI 20073
IRI 6.ASTM E950, Standard Test Method for
ASTM IRI Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled
IRI4.50m/km IRIPCI Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established
Inertial Profiling Reference, 2004.
IRI
7.CNS 15046
200612
PCIIRI
IRI
1.
PCI PCI 2005
2005IRI IRIPCI 06
2006
2 2
PCIIRIPCI 2.
() (
PCI )200512
IRIPCI
PMS
IRIASTM E9501998
SUMMARY
5M(R=80m)
1
2
1 2 3
(
)()
2
161kv
(R=80m)
B0+000~B2+019
VS-1
R=80m
2 4
VS-3
VS-4
VS-7
VS-5
1
30mm
2 VS-5
() 2
0.074%
12~13mVS-2VS-1
3
(1)
1650kN1650st
R=80m
181500kN250st16(
VS-510m
2.00.5) ()
(600mm) (R/D)(R/
(3,926 kN-m) D)20
(480mmX430mm) (R/D)35 5
( R80mD=5.5m(R/
238 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 239
1
()
(6)
5,500mm
R=80m
5,000mm250mm
9
180mm fc=420kg/cm26A3, B
CK1 GYVEL(
200mm7.17` R=80m )
37.7 75
200mm4.27 100m100 50m
22.5 7 (X,Y,Z)
(X,Y,Z)
(8)
2
2
8
7
240 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 241
R=80m 1.0m R=80m
Ds=5500mm 1.772m3R=80m
35mm 1.0m
28.8%
()
R=80mR=120m
10
()
K
R=80mK
()
111K
100mm13
12
1 R=80m
0.75m () R=120m
H V SQR(H^2+V^2) 0'00''00(H) (H) (V)
(TL)
TL60L1 0.625 0.000 0.625 0'37''30 2250 0 L
TL60L2 0.500 0.365 0.619 0'30''00 1800 1313 LD
TL60L3 0.198 0.594 0.626 0'11''53 713 2138 LD
10 TL60R3 0.198 0.594 0.626 0'11''53 713 (2138) RU
TL60R2 0.198 0.594 0.626 0'11''53 713 (2138) LU
2 2
TL60R1 0.500 0.365 0.619 0'30''00 1800 (1313) LU
15
()
3~4kg/cm2
13
214
12 ()
R=80m 14
R=80m
(75cm
135%
11 K
242 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 243
100cm)R=120mR ()
14R=120m
R=80m
15 R=80m
25mm
R=80m0.75m
18mm
R=80m
14
~ 1. 2006
5650mm(EPB)
2 2
15 2. 2005
5650mm
3. (1996)
()
SUMMARY
()
(Project-oriented)
(MIS)(PM)(Smart PMIS)
(B2G)
1
2
3
4
1 2 3 4
(96)
2
(Project-oriented)
(MIS)(PM)
(Smart PMIS)(B2G)
(Smart PMIS)(B2G)
1 Smart_PMIS
()
Smart_PMIS
/
PROJECT 2 Smart_PMIS
()
()
2
Smart_PMIS
Web-Solution
Internet
ExplorerSmart_PMIS
2 2
E-MAIL
Smart_PMIS
3 Smart_PMIS
()
Smart_PMIS
()
1
3
248 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 249
(1) B2G )
(2)PCM
()
G2G95
(3) 2008
95
(4)
B2G
(5)
()/
() 92 MS excel
93
(97) ()(
)(
)
4 G2G
94 B2G
B2G
2 2
G2G
B2G
2
()5
()
94
G2G
/
4 Smart_PMIS B2G
(
B2G ()
B2G
6
()
Smart_PMISB2G
1.
WebPMIS
2
Smart_PMIS
2
Smart_
PMIS
2.
MIS
()
Smart_PMIS
252 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 253
7 8
(Dimension)
8
EXCEL
Smart_PMIS
7
Roll-Up
Drill-Down
2 2
1.(PMIS-XML)
2008
(
PCM
(MIS)(PM) 2.()
) (Smart_PMIS)(B2G) ......... 2008
5%
9651 3.
(Data () -94~97
Warehousing)(OLAP) 20052008
(Business Intelligence)
SUMMARY
(
CECI)89
CECI
89CECI
4
1 2 3 4
CECI
CECI
CECI
2
CECI
CECI
eInternetIntranet CECI
ISO
2001
89 IBM
CECI (CKO)(LaurencePrusak)
(Working Knowledge)(
256 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 257
ThomasH. Davenport)[1]
94
SOS
(
(2)[3] )
CECI
1 CECI(Evolution)
(The Knowledge Creating
Company)[2]
()
2 3 CECI
CECI
CECI
2 2
CECI (1) 10
89 10
90
CECI87 3
CECI30
90 GIS
CECI
DTM/
e
258 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 259
()
(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting)
[4](1) ()
S
()
KM=(P+K)--------------------------- (1)
KM: Knowledge Management ()
P: People
K: Knowledge ()(e-Learning)
+: Technology
S: Share () 5
()
KGP60
KGP/ 6
()
(1)
(5)
SOS
S()(P+K)
CECI ()
92KM(4) 100%
1.
84%840( 75%50%25%0% 2.
3.
1/2) 285( (6) 4.1~3
1/5) ()
CECI
SOS
2
CECI
2
KGP30
/ 8 SOS
//
SOS
/
CECI
CECI
(Knowledge Growing PointKGP)[5] 7 SOS
4 92KM 7
260 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 261
SOS
Frans KGP
Johansson KGP 94KGP
[6] 93~96
(14)79%89%
103%1%
10 99.25%
60~120 KGP
9
119681.06
CECI (SOS)48%
()7%
KGP
(8)
1213
CECIKM 12 96/
KGP
9KGP 10
9234793 (Anytime)(Anywhere)
1512941650 (on Any Devices)
(1)1650
13 96/
2 2
11 96(81.06)
92
8 CECI
14 93 ~ 96
262 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 263
PFT
()
SOS9361090 IAT()
822 () IFT
KMS KMS ()
KMS L N
L
NDT NDS
TB (%) u 100% ----- (2) N
NDT
i:ORTSii
NDT()
k:HRTSkk
NDSSOS ()
()SOS
16 SOS ORTsiSOS
CECISOS ()
TB(%)
HRTSkSOS
()
(15)SOS(16) (KMS) () FATSSOS
(Man hour)
SOS ()
SOS KMS STTSOS()
(3)SOS
(4) (5)
TTT STT
(SOS) TTT=[(NDTMCTMPT)+(MNTMTT MHB(%) u 100%
TTT
2 2
[7] MPT)]+[(PATPFT)]+[(IATIFT)]
------------------------------------------------ (5)
---------------------------------------------- (3)
SOS654 MHB(%)
TTT(hr)
()
MPT()
MCT
()
MNT
SOS
()
(6)SOS
MTT()
(7)
PAT()
15
264 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 265
( NDT u MCT u MPT ) (MN T u MTT u MPT )
TTC u EAR
( PA T u PFT ) ( IAT u IFT ) CECI
SOS
--------------------------------------------- (6)
27,586CECI
NDTMCTMPTMNTPATPFT
SOS
IATIFTMTT(3)
EAR(/hr)
CECIKMSSOS
TTC()
SOS
STC=
L
(ORT
i 1
Si u EUR) ( FAT u EUR) 17
-------------------------------------------------(7)
ORTSiFATS SOS 3. (2006)
CECI89
EUR(/)
71172
STCSOS()
181
KGP
(8)
4.(Arthur Andersen Business
TTC STC
CB(%) u 100% Consulting)/ (2000)
TTC
--------------------------------------------------(8)
5. (2006)
TTCSTC CECIKMSOS
CB(%) CECI
72186199
2 2
CECI
6.Frans Johansson(2005)
CECI96.5.1
-The Medici Effect
1./ 7.
(1999) (2007)PISP
SOS (Working Knowledge)
93.6~97.11822 SOS
SOS 2.
2267.55 (1997)
17
266 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 267
400
SI
Word(
) ()5-6,0002.5312
1.5
l23
1
1
()6,000(A48())
12Table 1Figure2
81
(l) 20
141-151
(1983)
BazantZ.P.and ohB.H.,Strain-rate effect in rapid triaxial loading of concreteJournal of
Engineering MechanicsASCEVol.108No.5,pp.764-782(1982).
(2)
177-184(1987) (81)
Zienkiewicz,O.C.,The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill,London,PP.257-295(1977)
(3) CECI
T71
25-30(1982) 20
Nasu, M., and Tamura,T.,Vibration test of the underground pipe with a comparatively large cross-section, 20
Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Rome,Italy,PP.583-592(1973)
(4)
(1982)
Lin,C.H.,Rational for limits to reinforcement of tied concrete column,Ph.D.Dissertation, DePartment of Civil 482
Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas (1984).
(5)
No.53 (1983)
Thompson,J.P.,Fire resistance of reinforced concrete floorsPCA Report,Chicago, U.S.A.,pp.1-15(1963).
106
18527
82
: 98430