You are on page 1of 135

78125

8120
58
e 50

70
78
120



2020

2020





2020
20 20






20

4 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 5



78
20




20


20
20
(BOT
20



965



20 20


6 No.81
No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 7
CECI News



20
70




CECI







8 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 9


1
INTERVIEW
Autocad

PC 286
I-Deas
SUN

80%20%
Autocad
R10
Autocad I-deas


58













ISO

1
ISO 9001


1969/8/1




CAD/CAM



10 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 11
1
INTERVIEW



1970/8/4











12 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 13
1
INTERVIEW


92

5 60

20

1/500,000
1970/8/4

73


14 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 15
1
INTERVIEW
781





CAD

EagleCAD







e
90







20

20


1971/7/1

6263



16 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 17


1
INTERVIEW


30331 68

52

57

76

53

76

84

3 8790
63
93

60


30




1


1971/9/9


609
32


~

66




18 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 19
1
INTERVIEW








800




Try
!


top downbottom up










1971/9/24




65


ProposalReport


20 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 21
1
INTERVIEW


(626)(

( )(6428)

8120 ()

(691015)

(699)

752( (

)( )

) 77714 (789 9651

769 (95

(781) ( 11961231)

() (

(81) 1

97125


1971/11/29

() 12) )

(764) (855) 88

(891 70(954

1901231) 30)

581122 20

69912
22 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 23
1


INTERVIEW



1972/4/1











24 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 25
1
INTERVIEW

45 200

61

87

30

20

15

30


1972/6/12

26 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 27


1
INTERVIEW


1973/3/12

28 No.81 January, 2009 () () () () No.81 January, 2009 29


1
INTERVIEW

20
80
551
35



96

1
6259012


2884


1973/5/1



130

3520



30 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 31
1
INTERVIEW
91454


55

(58

91454

()

921SARS


62

DCICECIAssist Resident Engineer


--35
1974/1/7




8792
9049


88104460(8810

9210)44
32 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 33
1
INTERVIEW

Finsterwalder(

Severinsbrcke1960

LeonhardtStrabag

Dywidag

DywidagGerstwagen

Rabcewicz

Beton- und

StahlbetonbauStahlbau

1)
ke(196
ln Sev erinsbrc
K


1976/7/20


() () ()
34 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 35
1
INTERVIEW














7



68



1-1
1979/5/2



9610
E708-3E708-4




36 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 37
1
INTERVIEW


2004

2005

Q & A

1979

20074


1979/9/1

2008

38 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 39


1
INTERVIEW

74


() () ()

CECI


1985/8/5

CECI

CECI

96


40 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 41
1
INTERVIEW



1986/6/20


()
42 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 43
1
INTERVIEW


78

70

90


1988/12/16


44 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 45
1
INTERVIEW




(58)

10






() ()




4,000






1


4,000
1990/10/1

921
4,000


921

921

46 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 47


1
INTERVIEW




(58)

10






() ()




4,000






1


4,000
1990/10/1

921
4,000


921

921

46 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 47


1
INTERVIEW


CECI 21

9212

781

25148(8910

(49/90.2~69

/95.1)

70

70(954)




(International Serial Data System-ISDS
1


Internation Centre)(
1988/3/11

95 95430
International Standard Serial Number

ISSN)



ISSN 1818-4464

!!

48 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 49


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY


40



CL700A~

1 2



40


2
58



state of art
31
15707
50183km

1

50 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 51


18m5m663m2
4
1600~1900m


60~70



N
0~20W/10~25E
2
4

2km
4km


PLAXISSTAAD
1 2213.5 IVV
300 40cmIIIII
154 30cm
c
16.6 f c 245kg / cm 2 56
IIIIIII
10~2020.4 3
5III18
11.4
700A~

2 2


3

~1

5


921


9.0m
663m
3.25m0.25m
1700m 6
4.6m1.0m2.0m

640m

52 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 53
1.64km
UDEC4
21
24.7


12m73m
10m
0~60m

8









10663m

0~60m


1%
78
300m105mm
RQD25
4.5m

9

93 9
10.6m6.8m
VVI
1426m108m2
93
20

7~11

2 2

58
(1)



(2)
CL302
(3)




(4)

7 CL302

RC




54 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 55

(NATM)
94

RC- ABAQUS3D 93

35m10
97



12
20

RC CL700A


2
65.6m
10 RC

22.4m 4968m
(24m)

68




60m
(GL-1.0m~GL-
12
2.5m)13
11 ABCD

2 2

50m





CL302
CL303 2.4m
#43
22.4m24m11
#43
68 13 700A

1.5m



30m()

1.2m

56 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 57


3.0%5.6m
14

\ +
1718
19



96


14
17
8910

2

~~345kV



#1



881.56km
1516 19

18

2
2


20

15 ()
4.8m6.0m32.9m
7
9610


16 (O47)
20 ~~345kV
16 ()
58 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 59
5.2m FRP()
1.56km#13.5m

3m






FRP(Fiber Reinforced Plastic)
22


FRP


24
GL.- #1

2~GL.-5m 24m

2112~18m 1.2m42m
2.4m1.85m
8
23


245.93m
()
R=50m


4.7

25
50cm
21 ~~
50cm39cm11cm

2 2
23









25


22 FRP
60 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 61
7.(2008)
724




1.4cm5cm
11000
8.9cm10cm

3.2cm1cm#2






PVC

FRP

5.93m
R=50m
4.7
1.(1998)

#2
2.(20032004
2006)


2 2
3.(2004)
~12004


408~415
88
ANASYS 4.(2004)CL302


5.(2007)
CL700A

6.(2008)
97

13~23
62 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 63
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY



20073.52TEU(
71.0%)3.04TEU(61.3%)

20133.4

(Public sector)(Private sector)(Terminal


operators)(Global operator)(Other private
sector)











1
64 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 65
(SPCWT) 1






Haifa(Israel)
100% Gothenburg(Sweden)
Burban(South Africa)
Shuwaikh(Kuwait)

Oakland Container
(Global operator)

Terminal,(USA)
ECT(Rotterdam)

Port2000,LeHavre(France)
() Santos Brasil(Brazil)
LaemChabang International
() BOT Terminal, (Thailand)
JNPT(India)
Teeport(UK)
() 100% Liverpool(UK)

Annual Review of Global Container

Terminal Operators-2008,Drewry Shipping Consultants
Ltd.

2

(Terminal operator)

1. 1.
() 2. 2.
100% 3. 3.
100%

4. 4.


1
()
()(
2
)
BOT
PSA20056

2 2


SIPG


(
1992 (Global operator)
)
(
19938(HIT) )
(SCT)



1998
(SPC) 2 Drewry

2

(SPC)(SCT)

66 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 67
2007
4.09 50.7%Drewry
TEU(82.5%) 2007~2013
5
(
)
4
199342%2007 TEU

() 17.5%
Drewry(3)
2007
56.4%
2 (Global operators)
201358.2%
(Global
operators)

Drewry,Sep.2008


5
TEU

Drewry
(Public
sector)(Other private
Drewry2007
sector)
3.52TEU(
(Global
71.0%)20062007
operators)Drewry Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd,2008,

2 2
3 (1996-2007)
4
1996-2007 Drewry,Sep.2008


APM Terminals(
3
2Maersk)Cosco (5
2001 3 2004-2010
Cosco Container Lines) MSC(6
2013
) Evergreen(8
0.65 3.4
)
TEU ()
(Terminal
(Global operatorsOther private
operators)42007
sector)


Annual Review of Global Container Terminal Operators- 2008 3.04TEU61.3%(
(Global Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd.
60.8%)
operators)
68 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 69
2007 6 (2007)

50.7%

Drewry Drewry
20027,780.4TEU2007 2007
12,216.0TEU5
Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd,2008,
1.57( 656
4)2007 (


Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd,2008,




()()



4 2007


2007
2,827.0TEU51.76 )
4.09TEU(

2 2
1,435.0TEU5
82.5%)
1.65


5 (2007)

1,337.0TEU52.28 5HPHCOSCO

PSA

DP World
(Global operators)


APM Terminals



(
)

70 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 71








1.Annual Review of Global Container Terminal
2007 Operators, Drewry Shipping Consultants

3.4 Ltd.,2004-2008.



2. Annual Container Market Review and

Forecast, Drewry Shipping Consultants

Ltd.,2004-2008.
(Terminal operators)


3.
,2006

,2006.09.











2 2
(Terminal operators)
2007
(Global operators)

















72 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 73
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

1
2
3
4

1 2 3 4









6783
590
8.9%5
74 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 75
524 94-9618
17.7%12 (2) 78.15 cms62
267.93 cms
2001.5 m
1001.0 m
500.8 m
131,23196109,141
948
951






(1)

272 3
2,900
mm 4,500 mm


54096
519.810
96.3%

2
2



3 4


1


59




2180

1,869 cms(96)

4
76 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 77
911(2004)0605(2007)(2007)
(2008)
78.8mm/hr

XP-SWMM
78.8mm/hr 5
2 6Qp
Q0Q1
() mm/hr
Q2
109.5 105 93.5 84.5
(2001) (*) (*) (*) (*) Q3
97 38.5 36.5 36.5
78.8mm/hr5%10% (2004) (*) (*) (*) (*)
10%20% 911 160.5 62.5 59.5 54
(2004) (*) (*) (*) (*)
0605 96.5 89 71.1 69.5
(2007) (**) (**) (*) (*)
() 81 79 77 72
(2007) (**) (*) (**) (*)
7

106 87.5 78.5 69
(2008) (*) (*) (*) (*)

() ***

1
C ()
78.8mm/hr20%
0.91.0C 94.56mm/hr(95mm/hr)
20 5

C1.1~1.2

1 ()
1020
8

(1990)
(2004) (2000) (2006)
20%
0.85-0.95

2 2
()
0.9-1.0 1.0 1.0 78.8mm/hr

0.70-0.73(0.83) 0.9-1.0 1.0 0.9 95mm/hr(8)


0.66-0.89(0.79) 0.9 1.0 0.8
20%

0.56-0.78(0.67) - - 0.65
6
0.3-0.5(0.38) 0.4-0.5 - 0.45
0.55-0.75(0.60) 0.3 - -

1.(5)78.8mm/hr 1.
() (1)
() 2.(10)87mm/hr

(10%) (2)
7
2(2001)(2004) 3.(20)95mm/hr
20%()
(20%)
78 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 79
(3) 4. 14.5%

3 6.75CMS

(4)+ 910 28.0%

910

2. 2.961 ()

(1)27.08ha 13.768mm/hr

(2) 5.148mm/hr 11

7 (8) 20%78.8mm/hr
95mm/hr(12) 11
420m3/ha 7
(3) (7)

1,800m3 XP-SWMM
1.

3 8.07CMS (1)
9.39CMS(95mm/hr) CN

mm/5min % CMS % 14.1% (2)

(95mm/hr) 15.90 9.39
8.03CMS
15.47 2.70 8.07 14.1
(3)
15.90 8.03 14.5
(4)
+ 15.47 2.70 6.75 28.0

2.

3. (1)749.8ha

(1) (2)89.77%(

673.10ha
76.7ha) 12 20%
(2)
( (3)
4

2 2
8)
9
(3) 7.9m3/ha


1 2 3 4 5

XP-SWMM (4)

6 180 370 35,000 3,200 6,000
(4)7 (m3)

227m 3 /
ha 3.
(5)XP-SWMM
(5)45 (1)

(6)123 SCS(CN)(C
(6)XP-
4 )
SWMM
(2)


10 (13)
80 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 81
XP-SWMM
50.52CMS
3.8% 3.-

6
924
XP-SWMM
4.-
47.12CMS10.26%

925
40.55CMS
5.-
22.78%
5 945
13
6.-
mm/5min (%) CMS (%
(3) 945
15.90 52.51
XP-SWMM
7.
15.90 50.82 3.2
() 805
(4)6

( 15.61 1.8 50.52 3.8 8.

) 9310
(5)
15.90 47.12 10.26
9.

15.90 40.55 22.78 946
XP-SWMM
(6)XP-SWMM
++ 15.90()
1.8 37.75 28.11 10.
15.61()
9312

11.-
9312

12.
[]2001
4. 13.
51415 []
AD 2001

2 2

CN83 14.


14
77C=0.60 ()2001

0.48C=0.60 15.Thomas EgliNon Structural Flood Plain


333.4ha Management Measures and their Effectiveness
Conference of Rhine Ministers 2001.
44.5%333.4ha30%
16.Hong Kong DSDStormwater Drainage
C0.48
Manual 2000
XP-SWMM 1.
913 17.Singapore PUBCode of Practice on Surface
52.51CMS
Water Drainage 2006
50.82CMS
3.2% 2.
9112
B 15
82 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 83
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

1 2 3



921




2001721
20047 2


820048
7


1


84 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 85


(4) 3(34)
[4]



(5) 97
3
47.5m+49.5m
149
10

(6) 2.4m2.5m~2.8m

2.6m

1.5mRC2000
[1]
(7) 12


[1,2]

2.

1
(1)
2
(


2[3]
)


(2) 3

I

RC

(3)
1.
RC

(1)19951

1

2 2
(
0.33g )
(4)


4

RC
(2) 3(5
8) [5]
(5)






(3)
GPS

2

86 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 87


RC



5 (1) 10 (2) 13 (1)

2001520023

3(9
12)[6]
634.5
6 (2) 16 14 (2)
11
I
2.0
13
2.0855

RC8
162.4
7
7 14 12 15
1.5mRC
3(13
20013
16) [7]

2 2

9225m


19475m

37.5m+3@50m+45m=232.5m
8 I8 16
2.2m2.38mP19P20

149(1720)


[8]
9 (1) 1.15m
12

161.5mRC


200012
564.630


88 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 89
3.
40


4.
20
160
220I 5.
20
(30m+40m+70m+45m+35m) 22
P1P4
91.5mRCP2P3
121.5mRC 6
[11,12]
200012


1.
(1)

(2) 7.

(3)

(1)(2)

(3) 200121

2.
[10,13]
17 (1)




21

3.


22

2 2
[9,10] 23



18 (2)
[11,12]


1.






2.
4.6

21
(23)

19
90 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 91
2.
70m+90m+70m=230m
24 20073
(27)

28
25

()20048
[10,14]
27

() 20048
[10,14]
29

1. () 20047

[14]

250m
70+3@92+70=416m 1.

2.43.7m

RC25m(24)

1.

2.

8
400m 8
1.
82+3@100+82= 464m 7

2 2
2.64.0m 8

RC40m(24) 100(26) 27030
8


150(28)
3.
2. 2.
200m
80+110+100+70 155
= 360m2.64.0m (29)
RC18m(
25)

26 30
92 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 93
2. 2~5
1993

[4]2001
() 560m
50+75+50=175m(31) () (

P38~P50

) 5m

P38~P5010m

( 32
P38~P5619
() )

() ()

31


()


()
() 32




()




[15]

2 2
1[16]

()




33
19942

3,030mI
1
13m26m35m
19
5I

4.1m2.1m

7m12.4m2m
[16]
() 10.5m60cm

28mPC

94 No.81 January, 2009 34 No.81 January, 2009 95
()(3334)
1.5 ()(3940)

5


()(35)



36


41

39

37

()(38) 42

35

()(36
37) 40

2 2
()(4142)


43


()(43)

14



3

38

96 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 97


()
(4445)



6.921 15.



20008 19986



7.921

16.
20008 1

8.921 20048
149
20008

9.
P118131(1998)

44
10.



1.921 200611
20008
11.
2.
19952 1999

2 2
45 3. 12.



200812 2002

4.921 13.

20008 2002

5. 921 14.

20008 2004
98 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 99
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY










(1)(2)(3)

4
1 2 3 4




(1)(2)
(3)

2
[1]









53m5m20m




29

100 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 101
1 2 5 6

3 4 7

100+160+100=360m
83

(1)
138m33m

85 2.0~3.2m

(3) 1.1m
()


134m27m
100180100380m2.4
()
89 17.58m

(5) 97

(7)
1.8~3.0m

2 1.0m
30
2


470134

83
13470408m
(2)
18m 9418794375m3.0
87 19.8m

(
(4) 48K+800~66K+850)
(
) 130m
95
750m (6) 20m
102 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 103







10




[2]

9(Strut-and-Tie Model)
12
11
180m
18m20m
20m2m2.4m ()
13.1m
3.44m2.53m
20 m CEB-FIP 1990
2.4m4.9m (Aging Coefficient
8 Method)(Step-by-Step Method)
12
[3][4]

2 2
()[5][6] [7]
1011 180m


8

()



hyperbolic sin
(
(Strut-and-Tie)9 CQC)
(
)
90%
104 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 105




() 14

1
0.4431

0.8111
14
0.71713
53.5m
15 ()




16
10.443


15
16

10.811

1. 2. 3. 4.

2 2


10.717

13

5. 6. 7. 8.





9. 10. 11. 12.

15 17
106 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 107
2;

3;

18
60
4;

21


941971
1
24




2







17 3 22

19



18


2324

1. "
"21

20029

2. " PC
"
20 20087
1
3. A.M. Neville, W. D. Dilger and J. J. Brooks,
Creep of plain and structural concrete(1969)
4. STRUCTURAL EFFECTS OF TIME-DEPENDENT

2 2
2

BEHAVIOUR OF CONCRETE, Published by Georgi


Publishing Company, 1813 Saint-Saphorin,


() Switzerland(1972)
3
23 5.
(19952000)
6. Mario Paz,Structural Dynamics Theory and
Computation(1985)
1920 2122 7.
(1996)



108 No.81 January, 2009 24 No.81 January, 2009 109
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY





CECI



1
2

4
1 2 3 4

921




88921




2







CECI
REA
multi-disciplinary
GPS
110 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 111
()
(88
)(93)5








(-
2 )
19.812.7
63.9%3.115.8% 22.1
420.3% 2119.6







1


2 2
1314


1012




(

4
1

112 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 113
1


0+575-0+615 E1

0+795 T1A

1+240 T1 1+240

1+820-1+900 H1 50

(REA) 2+050 T2 2+050



2+230
GISGPSRS

2+400-2+940

3+455 T3 1.5 3+45520


REA 3+950-4+210 H2 3+950-4+210 4+075

(2)
4+311-4+572 H3 4+500500


()4
89
92





3 4 5



(REA)
(3)





(4)

(
2

2 2
)


(
5)

Rapid

Ecological AssessmentREA
REA


(

)


1


114 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 115


3015





IBA

(6)

9



(6K+2007K+200)





(

7)




(12K+40013K+100)
13K+100


(
8) 10


(9)

2 2






500

(10)


8

18

(4K+500)

96(7) 7
(11)
116 No.81 January, 2009 3 No.81 January, 2009 117



Top 6.2003
11 Down
(13)
7.2004
2004.4
V255P5-11


! 8.2005






9.
2005
12


10.

2005

()
1.2004 11.Hans Lorenz1970
()

2.2006
13 12.1999



( 0+5750+615)

2 2
3.1999 13.1999pocket
book


(12)

4.2005 14.2006
2006

5.2004 15.2006
(4+6704+850) 2006





118 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 119
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY
9512


(17.2)
94


1 2 3



905(
)

()88
78

2
89118 911220


922
2198
925
92223
95121
3610
90912 1,796,700,000
45 1,637,000,000

120 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 121



1,719,370,000


3.




()
3
1

1.


() ()
() 2.
(895
UK394+315 21
) 3.

()(
UK397+60029 1.
91430)
4.

2 2
26.07(1)
2


3140

(4)
35,100

()
()
() ()
(23) ()


() 9.64 ()
2.
()() 60%120%


122 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 123

8.20M
9.

()

1.G+1(5)

R16
4
(1)
()
(2) 6 G+2

() (3)25
(4)R16
1.182 M59
M
2.114 M420
970
3.330 M
9.4 M 2.G+2(6)
4.
5. 35111 m2
6. 62095 m2
7.
18M 7 G+3

2
2

3. G+3 (7)


5 G+1

124 No.81 January, 2009 8 G+4 No.81 January, 2009 125

4.G+4(8)








9
()9
1.(G+1)
R16

2.(G+2)R16
R16

13

()10
G+218
10

()11


G+2

14

()12
11

2 2
(
)


13~23 15







12 16
126 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 127
17 21

24

24~25
18 22

()


()R16



25

(26~33)

2 2
19 23
1F-3F PH-PK Line




93.05.27 ()
1F-3F ABC Line
DECK1F-3F PH-PK
Line DECK
()
()
1F-3F ABC Line

20
128 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 129





26 A-C Line 29 C-F 1-19 Line DECK 32
1-3F









27 D-F Line 30 33

2 2


1.--
(9354)

2.--
(936
15)

28 31
A-C Line G+1-G+3

130 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 131


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

1 2

132 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 133


(280~300km/hr) 4
10~20dB200
5~10dB 25~30m FFT5
200
(fn=nV/L)
100m200m 3
30~15dB [2]



1

Z()
1 (2a) 12.5m 3 4 ZdB1/3
()
1~100Hz


RMS Velocity (dB, ref. 1 micro-in/sec)

90

80
70 (fn=nV/L)
60
[2]
50
40
30
Z-direction
fn = n V/L------------------------------------------(1)
20

2 2
10
0
(2b)200m fn =n(order) 5 ZFFT
1 1.6 2.5 4 6.3 10 16 25 40 63 100


1/3 Octave Band Center Frequency (Hz) n=(1,2,3,.)
2 (
12.5m200m300km/hr) V=
1 (
L=
300km/hr)
(1)

(structural criteria)
(physiological criteria)

(production-quality
3[1]
2 criteria)

1/344 16
3

134 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 135
1[3]

1
2
/
()
fu (Voltage
E x fc S x f df -------(4)
400 fl Sensitivity)10V/g
VC-A 50 8 fu f l 0.5g(pk)

f c
10003 ANSIS1.6-1984
VC-B 25 3 (
1/3
)


1
VC-C 12.5 1

() 'f i fu  fl
1/3
x(t)(RMS) V x fc () ()
TEMs SEMs
one - third octave band
VC-D 6 0.3 E-Beam

dBdB V x fc E x fc --------(5)



VC-E 3 0.1

() f c
16
Qm 10
6
in/sec
dB 20 log 10 ------------------------(2)

Q ref RMS(Lv)
dynamic signal processor
1.1/38-100 Hz (dB10-6 in/sec) V x fc
v m v ref Lv dB 20 log10 3
2.
v ref
6
10 in / sec 10 6 ---------(6) 16

(48163264

)(
0.1~10kHz)
(
(RMS) )
1/3RMSdB [4] 512Hz

()
() bandfilter

2 2
x(t)816 1/3(


1100Hz21)

Sx(f)

2 X f 2 ()
Sx f --------------(3)
T
6 [3] (Linear
X f x(t)f Average)
Tx(t)




() 1~100Hz

136 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 137
(
( 9 LS-ALS-B)
)






() [4]



(
)
8
(

)
( ()
7)


1.Chen, Y.J., Shen, Y.J., Chen, K.Y., and Chang, S.M.
(2008). Some Characteristics of Ground Vibration as
(8) Induced by High-Speed Trains, Geotechnical Earthquake

Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, GSP 181, ASCE.

2.Ju, S.H., Lin, H.T., and Chen, T.K. (2007). Studying



Characteristics of Train-Induced Ground Vibrations
Adjacent to an Elevated Railway by Field Experiments,

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental

2 2
Engineering ASCE, 133 (10), 1302-1307.


3.Gordon, C.G. (1991), Generic criteria for vibration

9 [5] sensitive equipment. Optics and Metrology; 1619:71-75.


4.(2002) "

,




5.Chen, Y.-J., Shen, Y.-J., and Chen, K.-Y. (2006) The
() [4] characteristics and measurement scheme for ground

vibration induced by passing train in bridge structures,
Inter-Noise 2006.



138 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 139
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

1 2

(TCS)








()(Traffic Control System,
TCS)


() /
/

140 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 141




80~100km/hr



50~100


(

)



()







300~350km/hr6

4(-0.9m/

s2-1.3m/s2) 1

3 (COMTRAC)

2 2

2


(Operation Control
Center; OCC)

(Fail-

Safe)
3








1

142 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 143


CTC


CTC


CTC
CTC

CTC

2 CTC
4CTC

CTCCTC
CTC

(Computer aided Traffic Control, COMTRAC)

(Man-Machine
Advanced Processor, MAP)
(Programmed
Route Control, PRC)
4 CTC
(Automatic Route Setting, ARS)

2
(Electronic Data Processing
4 2


3
Computer, EDP)


(Supervisory
CTC
Control and Data Acquisition, SCADA) CTC

(Operation Control Center;

OCC)

CTC

(Central Traffic Control


CTC
System, CTC)
(CTC)
144 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 145
CTC OCC CTC
25kV 197211~
CTC

197411~


6
19753~


19818


19822


6
19852

5 - CTC()(TCS)


-5 24 1964~CTC
-

(1964

1.1920030.1)
19723 CTC

2 2
()



1961
(OCC)


1969 (//
OCC
(Computer aided Traffic Control, COMTRAC) )


19723~

(COMTRAC)
()(Traffic Control System, TCS)

146 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 147
()



(
)

(CEDS)
(N
)(R) ()
(H)(I)
(L) (OCC)(UC)
8 (SCR)(DCR)
(TDRD)

()

8
7

()


(ARS)(TDS) (ADS)

(ADS) (ARS)(CFS)

(TLMS)
7
1.

(Non-ARS)
()

(Train Describer System,

TDS)

2 2
1.

TDS A.






( TD (transfer track)
2.
)
ARS
()

(PIS) B.

(ARS)
(ATC)
(Signaling Telemetry System)

C.ARS
(MMIS)
148 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 149
(CFS) ()
(CEDS)

()(Current Timetable)
2. ()
ARS () (24)
(TDRD)
ARS
(ADS)
(CFS) 1
2
(SCADA)
(CEDS) 1
ST A D B E B C B(extra)
Taipei Dep. 18:00:00 18:03:30 18:19:45 18:23:15 18:40:00 18:51:30 18:55:00

Panchiao Arri. 18:05:15 18:10:00 18:26:15 18:29:45 18:46:30 18:58:00 19:01:30

Dep. 18:05:15 18:12:00 18:28:15 18:31:45 18:48:30 19:00:00 19:07:15
(ARS) Taoyuan Arri. 18:13:45 18:23:15 18:37:15 18:43:00 18:57:30 19:09:00 19:16:15

Dep. 18:13:45 18:25:15 18:37:15 18:45:00 18:57:30 19:09:00 19:16:15

1. Hsinchu Arri. 18:20:30 18:36:15 18:44:00 18:56:00 19:04:15 19:15:45 19:23:00



Dep. 18:20:30 18:38:15 18:44:00 18:58:00 19:04:15 19:15:45 19:23:00

Taichung Arri. 18:40:00 19:02:15 19:05:30 19:22:00 19:25:45 19:37:15 19:44:30
2. Dep. 18:40:00 19:12:00 19:08:30 19:28:45 19:41:15 19:47:30
Chiayi Arri. 18:57:45 19:34:00 19:28:30 19:48:45 20:03:15 20:07:30
Dep. 18:57:45 19:36:00 19:28:30 19:48:45 20:10:00 20:07:30
Tainan Arri. 19:10:30 19:53:15 19:41:15 20:01:30 20:27:15 20:20:15
3. Dep. 19:10:30 19:55:15 19:41:15 20:01:30 20:29:15 20:20:15
Kaohsiung Arri. 19:20:00 20:07:15 19:50:45 20:11:00 20:41:15 20:29:45
9
ABC
4.
2

2 2
5. E P E P E E

() (3105) (2113) (1017) (54) (3109) (1151) (2563) (3084) (2756)


10:23.0 10:28.0 10:39.5 10:44.5 10:49.5 11:04.5 11:01.5 11:11.5 11:05.5

10:23.5 10:28.5 10:39.5 10:46.5 10:50.0 11:04.5 11:02.5 11:12.0 11:06.5
10:27.5 10:32.0 10:41.5 10:49.5 10:53.0 11:06.5 11:06.5 11:15.0 11:10.5

10:28.0 10:32.5 10:41.5 10:49.5 10:53.0 11:06.5 11:07.0 11:15.0 11:11.0
10:34.0 10:38.5 10:45.5 10:53.5 10:58.0 11:10.5 11:13.0 11:20.0 11:17.0

10:34.5 10:39.5 10:45.5 10:53.5 10:58.5 11:10.5 11:13.5 11:20.5 11:25.0
10:39.0 10:44.0 10:49.0 10:57.5 11:03.0 11:14.0 11:18.0 11:25.0 11:30.0
9
10:40.0 10:45.0 10:50.0 10:58.5 11:04.0 11:15.0 11:19.0 11:26.0 11:31.0
10:46.0 10:51.0 10:56.0 11:06.0 11:10.0 11:21.0 11:25.0 11:32.0 11:37.0

10:50.0 10:55.0 11:00.0 11:10.0 11:15.0 11:25.0 11:30.0 11:35.0 11:40.0
10:55.0 11:00.0 11:04.0 11:14.0 11:20.0 11:29.0 11:35.0 11:40.0 11:45.0

10:55.5 11:00.5 11:04.0 11:14.0 11:20.5 11:29.0 11:35.5 11:40.5 11:45.5
() 11:01.5 11:06.0 11:09.0 11:19.5 11:26.5 11:34.0 11:41.5 11:47.0 11:51.5

11:02.5 11:14.5 11:11.5 11:21.0 11:27.5 11:36.0 11:42.5 11:48.0 11:53.0

150 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 151
(ARS)
(Train List Management
System, TLMS) ())
(ARS)() (/
(TCS) )

(MMIS)(CFS)

1.
(ARS) CTC
88
/(
3)
2.JR
(White Period)
1997

Automatic Diagram
3.Tetsuo Takashige, Signalling Systems for Safe
System,ADS)
Railway Transport, Japan Railway & Transport

Review 21, September 1999.

()
4.P.J.N. Bartlett, IECC BR New Generation

signalling Centre, Third Railway signalling and

Telecommunications Course 1993, paper No. 3.2.3.
10

5.A.St. Johnstont, Train Describers and

Associated Systems, Third Railway signalling

and Telecommunications Course 1993, paper No.

3.3.3.

10 6.

91

2


2


7.

85
TDS
(TLMS)
8.
(TDS) (MIS)

(MMIS)
(OMIS)
9.

2005


152 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 153
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

14.8986
12.5

U/

1
2
DB144 3

DB145 4

1 2 3 4



11037




14.812
12.511
83
(B1)
90 B2B3B4
B5B6

154 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 155


B7B8B9 10m GP2000
B10B11
1012

30(
6)

4 CP-1

() 6 (FLAC)

CP-1





PC80cm

39m
2
24

2


PC (7)
2


PC
5


CP-1(45) ()







() (76)
PC

(89)
TM-5-855-11986
(3)
156 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 157
10U()

100UU




3D(
)10U
()
11U
11
8

2 UU 12 13
2



906
9 352

1213
14
U

U
U25m 14

158 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 159






(16)
H



ABAQUS (1718) (19)
---

94 20





ABAQUS15

16

19

2 2


17

15 20
18
160 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 161
21~31






21 25 29

(B1) (B5) (B9)
986






22 26 30
28
(B2) (B6) (B10)
OR29




2 2
23 27 31

(B3) (B7) (B11)


BL18

24 28
(B4) (B8)

162 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 163
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

1 2
3

95111596
215





48
96

2


25

SPA


9272







93630

9415

2195915

164 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 165

10 1
30

5
100
MEGA 2
COLUMN



2.









5 !!!
!!!


21


!









1.
1

9




1.2

2 2
98
20


30
20

5

92


89812





9


2.



166 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 167


NO

YES

2. NO YES

NO

YES




NO NO

1.
3

1. !
!
3/ !

1. 2. !
1. !
!
2. !

!
1. 2.
3. !
1. !
! 1. 2. ! 2. !

1. ! 1. ! 2.
!
2. ! 2. !

! 1. ! 1. ! 1. !
2. 5 6
2. ! 2. !
3. ! 3. ! !
! 3. !

4


2.

2
2

3.

1.

3 1.

4.
168 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 169









7 8

1
45


8 .

STATNAMIC

1011




9
2

1.


12




2
2. 2









13 10
7
39




2.

170 No.81 January, 2009 11 No.81 January, 2009 171

(3)

()

1. 3.

12 (1) (1)


(2) (2)


(3)



(3)15
16

1FL 2.

(1)
14

DECK

(2)

2 15
2

SPA

172 No.81 January, 2009 13 14 No.81 January, 2009 173





FM!,55/81

FM!,51/31

FM!,46/81

FM!,42/3


FM!,36/3


FM!,31/81

FM!,27/31


FM!,21/31


FM!,6/81


FM!,2/31


FM!.4/71


FM!.9/:1


FM!.23/31


FM!.26/61

2.
6

16




18


1.
2
()

1


3.



3
2.
100%
2

117
15%



5%


3
1.



4


2 2
()
4 18



928

9812







RC
1.
5



17

174 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 175



2. 951125 96
1 1.
1//
2
34


2.
219 12
3
45
Smart-PMIS
!

!

()
0!
! !
!
!

Z!
!

O! QDN
! QDN !

! Z! O!

! !

19

2
2


()


   
   

   
   



20

20

176 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 177
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY
109


145031.2753mm(
150mm)

(CTCI)(IHI)

160,000

(Roof Air Raising) , (LNG Tank) , BOG(Boil Off


Gas Compressor) , ORV(Open Rack Vaporizer) , (PC Wall ,
Prestressed Concrete Wall)

1
2
3
1 2 3

160,000LNG
131415 160
160,000LNG BOG(BOIL OFF
GAS COMPRESSOR)BOG
54.3 BOG
300/900/ LNG
2


168/600/ ORV(OPEN RACK VAPORIZERS)

(1)
ORVLNG


LNG

178 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 179


LNG
LNG
LNG
(Methane,CH4)(R-50)
(Boiling Point)161.5(at
101.3kPa)(Freezing Point)
182.5(Critical Temperature)
82.6(Critical Pressure) LNG
4599.2kPa(Critical Density) LNG
162.7kg/m3160 9%Ni
LNG
LNG
9%
(Nickel steel)
PU(PERLITE)
1 LNG
(RESILENT GLASS WOOL BLANKET)
1. 2.Air Lifting
BOG0.05% PAMI (Positive
Alloy Material
LNG Identification)
78.253
42(27) 3./// 4.(Perlite)

37.2
(PC Wall , Prestressed Concrete Wall)(3)

2 2

2 LNG

(2) 5000 UNIT


1000 UNIT 6000 UNIT
2000 UNITLNG

3000 UNIT

4000 UNIT 3 PC Wall

180 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 181


Sheave)(Intermediate Roller)

(Snatch Block)A

(Tension Meter)(Turnbuckle)

(Bracket)A
LNG


Inner Roof Fit-up

30







(Chain block)

5 (Turn-buckle)





10



(7)

6
8

2 LNG
2


11

7



1450
(
9 A (12)
(53) 8)A(9)

(6) (10)

31.27 (

11)(Center
(Balance Weight)
182 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 183
(13)









(1050mm)

15 17 /
LNG
(Buffer Chamber) ()(
14
)
(15)
1.
31.27 m (2h x 60 min/h)
()
= 26.05 cm/min0.26 m/min0.30 m/
min(o.k)

2.
D2/4 = (78.2)2/4 = 4802.91 4803

() 3.CMM
12
4803 x 0.26 m/min = 1248.78 m3/min

1249 m3/min
150mm
(16) 4.CMM(
35%)
1249 m3/min x 1.35 3 = 562.05m3/min
560 m3/min

()(

)

1.(Pa)
1450 tonc 4803 =301.89kg/
16
=0.0301kg/cm2
2950Pa

2 (
2


2.Pa(
) 2
13
() 20%)
2950Pa x1.2 = 3540Pa
(50%+50%) 3.kw(
(33.3%+33.3%+33.3%) (17) 60%)
(3540 Pa x 560 m3/min) (60 x 1000 x
0.6= 55.07 kw(75 kw)
(Q-P Performance
33.3%50%(Step Control) Curve)
4.kw(
Y-P.F= 0.8)
14
184 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 185
75 kw x 2.5 0.8 = 234.375 kVA(
250 kVA)


()
,
18










1/500 (19)

150mm(D/500) 500 mm

1/3(
100mm300mm
150mm () )





(18)120






(
) 19
(QC)
(QA)

2 2


(LNG) 1.CIRT
180,000 2.CIRT
LNG 3.

4.
3

5.(
)
6.API STD 620 Design and Construction of Large
Welded Low-Pressure Storage Tanks .

160,000 7.ASHRAE Handbook (2005 Fundamental).


186 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 187
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY
73

11,000





(TIMCCC)




TIMCCCATMS

1
2

3
4

5 1 2 3 4 5








8020
1
731110

188 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 189


()




2.

3



2


(All
Purpose Incident Detection, APID)

[1] 4

()
()
8211
872
1.



(Advanced Traffic Management System,
2 898
ATMS)(Advanced
()
Traveler Information System, ATIS)
130 ()
(Intelligent
81
Transportation System, ITS)
86.5 387325 ()

2 2
814

12 8727 3



(13.9)
6 (210)
2.
26 (

328)1
()
() (273.84)
12K+418
1.
33K+09521
34



190 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 191


3. ()
6 (Traffic Information Management
1. Coordination and Command Center,
ITS TIMCCC)
ATMSATIS


TIMCCC

() 2. 7
1.3
8810942
2.
914982
3.1
9019012


3.

()

5

(17)
7
(

43)

()
5
6
()
5(

2 2
)
877966


()
8









5

3
94
(Route Guidence Sign, RGS)


192 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 193
TIMCCC


13
TIMCCC


13

[2]
[3]TIMCCC ()



13
()
8

1.

9
()


13 TIMCCC
962
TIMCCC
9

2. TIMCCC
()
TIMCCC

10 TIMCCC
TIMCCC
()

12




2 2
TIMCCC

10 (Personal Digital Assistant, PDA)






3.CMS ()

()

11 8A 501 R11 R12 F311Z F601C R21 R22 F321Z F537 R31 TIMCCC

1
5 5 6






XML(Extensible Markup

( ( ( ( (
62 76 72 82 Language)
66 6468 78) 74) 8486
) ) 88
)




11 12
194 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 195
() 14
XHTML(Extensible Hyper Text Markup
Language)
TIMCCC





()

14 VICS





OD
1.

(Origin Internet ITSIP(Internet
TIMCCC
Destination, OD) Protocol)15 1985.61~3
TIMCCC

OD
2.


OD
2005.74-99~4-109


3.



2005.73-4~3-5


2 TIMCCC 2


ITS
15 ITS



OD





(Pocket PC) ITS
()
(Navigator)

(Vehicle

Information and Communication System, VICS)

196 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 197
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY





97
()




3
1 2 3



Intelligent Information
Integration & Analysis Platform, IIIAP

()() 2


IIIAP
-

IIIAP
IIIAP


198 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 199







CCTV



1

1

No

1

2

3
4

5 VD

6 VD

7 CCTV

8 CMS


9 CMS

10

11
1

12 (GPS Data) GPS

13

14

15
16
()
17





() (

2 2

1)


1
() (

)






XMLHTMLTEXTMJPEG

JPG (IIIAP)



() 2
(Synchronized Process)

200 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 201



WEB
ITS
XML
(4)



2

2



5
CMS CMS


3 4

()

5


30

5



ETC VDCMS (Information Processor
VD 5
BUS( Pluggable)
)




2 2
2
()




(Remote

Procedure Call)







SMS

(
()
)
3
202 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 203
()

(Raw
Web
Data) Service
XML (6)Web Service
()
1.


XML
2. (

() 5)


3.


()

OD


6 Web Service
5

XML ()Web Service

Web Service XML


Web

2 2
Service

(Time Lag



)OD

XML




()HTTP-XML Web Service

HTTP-XML


CMS

RDS-TMC
HTTP-XML
204 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 205









(Time-Sensitive)











()




()


() XML





2 2
XMLHTML
ATMSATISAPTS
Web ServiceSocketURL RequestRemote



Procedure Call











206 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 207


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY



2006
2010



20072008

(Spatial Information)(GIS)

4
1 2 3 4

200779
Geographic Information 0960027673
System, GIS
(Spatial Information)




2





2006
2010
1


208 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 209


96
2008

2008


2009

2008-2010 2007
2008

Urban Area

Rural Area(2)


!

2007


2010

85%
GIS
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9
2
1

1/1000
1 1/5,000

1

20081016

ROAD

RDNODE

ROADA

2 2
HROADA
ROADSP



RAIL
GeoPDF
HSRAIL
RT
ANNORAIL
RIVERA
RIVERL
85% LAKE

COUNTY
2007
2006 TOWN
BLOCK

BUILD

MARK
CONTROL
ORTHO
210 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 211
1. 2. 1. CADGIS
25 1/1000 CAD
(1) 1/5000 GIS GIS
1.25 CAD 45
1/2500 1.25
2.5
(2) 1.25
2.5 2.5
1/5000
2008
2. 2.
25
50 (1)


(2)
()()
2008

NGIS
(3)
1.
1/1000 ()(
(1) 1/5000 )() 4
() GIS ()
() 3
()5 (4)

2 2
A.


1.25
B.
(2)
3.

5

2.5
7.5
3 4. 5
212 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 213

10
5*5 100
IMU 8
5 11
5
7 RC

Digital Elevation Model, DEM 9
2

Inertial Measuring Unit, 2
IMU

Global Positioning System, GPS

7 1 3
6 7 2 3
Direct Geo-referencing 7 3 8 () 10 3
DEM 4
7 4
3

8 5*5

11

2 2
7 ()()()



1.



2.


9
3.



3

3
6 GPSIMU 2008

1/1000
214 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 215
60%

80%





2
12 14


2

GPS

IMU


GIS



85%





13
GPSGIS












14



2 2

12 2-3


20102007

115%8
DEM
2200

238

366

(2200*8/2/3/8=366)

GIS
13



216 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 217
2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY







WH10-1PC

1 2 3

4@7+2@3+1@=
35

20m

13.1m3.44m~2.53mRC

13.1m2m~2.4mPC

13.1m4.9m~2.8m

2
PC

13.1m4.9m~2.4mPC


12.8m2m12.12m


3@2.5m1m
5m~2.26m



HDPE19
PC
100m+180m+100m=380m
(1,2)
218 No.81 January, 2009 4@IV20 No.81 January, 2009 219


(5)

1 PC

4 WH10-1PC

2 PC

WH10-1 E-206

5 PC

stage1stage24
E-206 WH10-1
(Lc5)

3 PC (Lc6)(Lc10)(Lc4)

(Lc7)(Lc8)

(Lc6)(Lc7)
35 m6M

10M
(1)

1
10M

2


















2



(4)





















PC

(3)


10M

PC24

220 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 221
6
1+2+3 1

(1) 6

XY
PC 7


4Y0.00136X0.76124
353.3T
18mTB1 (4)
0.92cm R20.9699
7

1.86cm0.92+1.86
TB1 2.78cm 4 (8)
1310cm (3)
2 2 +3+4 5
TB1
2.78/13101/471 < 1/3602

TB1 (2)
TB11
1
TB11
2

(1)(3)

2 2

2
2 +3 3



TB1TB1

3 6
3

1- 3-1 5-2

8
222 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 223
PC P6/P7
PC
4.1cm8.0cm
4.1cm8.0cm
PC = -3.9cm3cm
1313 5
13

STAGE3STAGE6STAGE9
STAGE12

STAGE2STAGE5STAGE8STAGE11 P6 P7

STAGE4
PC
STAGE7STAGE10STAGE13
[1]


STAGE1


9

2

13STAGE4

STAGE7

STAGE10STAGE13

5m

STAGE14STAGE23 5cm 10 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-15

3cm
9 ( ) STAGE16STAGE15

2
PC
STAGE16P6/P7
2


3.1cm
2 6.3cm
PC180M 3.1cm6.3cm= -3.2cm
180M/290MY -3.9cm-3.2cm

(mm)X (11)

(m)10STAGE15

2P6P7



P6P7

90m10
224 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 225
STAGE17 P6/P7
2.7cm

5.7cm2.7cm5.7cm= -3cm
STAGE16 WH10-1PC
-3.2cmSTAGE17 5
-3cm3cm(12)
P6P7
STAGE15STAGE16STAGE17
13 2STAGE17
3


5



11 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-16

AC
AC


10M5M

5M
stage

2
2






1.


7354-63(2007)
12 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-17 13 PLNE6PLNE7 STAGE-15-16-17

226 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 227


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY



()2004
(International Rough-
ness IndexIRI)(Pavement Condition IndexPCI)
2005~2008


IRIPCIPMS

1 2

ISTEA)PMS

PMS


PMS

PMS
IRIPCI
(Pavement
Management SystemPMS)20
41PMS1991
(Intermodal Surface ()
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

228 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 229


2 IRI(2)




IRI 1.2.8m/km 4.5m/km 1. 1. 1.
5.98m/km( 2.0m/km 1.1~1.3m/km 1.9m/km
3.
(1) ) 2.
2. 2.
5.5m/km 2.7m/
2.5m/km 1.1m/km
km
(2) 3. 3.
6.5m/km 3.0m/km 1.3~1.8m/km
150

3 IRI650cm/km(3)
PMS1991 *

ISTEAPMS
IRI750 IRI450 450IRI500 IRI500

PMS 650IRI750 IRI400 400IRI450 IRI450

199510PMSPMS 2~3cm IRI750 IRI500 500IRI550 IRI550


20 650IRI750 IRI450 450IRI500 IRI500

IRI750 IRI500 500IRI550 IRI550
1120 650IRI750 IRI450 450IRI500 IRI500

IRI750 IRI550 550IRI600 IRI600
811 650IRI750 IRI500 500IRI550 IRI550
2002
Roadware 4 IRI650cm/km(3)

1 (1) *


()
IRI650 IRI320 320IRI350 IRI350
1.
1983-1988

2.
IRI700 IRI350 350IRI380 IRI380
20
1991-1992


IRI700 IRI350 350IRI380 IRI380
1992-1993 1120
ORACLESQL

1993-1994 IRI750 IRI400 400IRI430 IRI430
811


1995-1997
(

PMS1)
1997-1999 GIS

2 2


1998-1999


2007 IRI
1999-2000

IRI
PMMS
2000-2001 PCI


PCI

2001-2002 PCI 1983
IRIPI



2002-2005 IRI

234

2004
PCI
230 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 231
IRI 2005 PCI
IRI
PCI ()

() ()

2006IRI

()
PCI () PCI
IRIPCI
IRI
PCI PCI
() IRI
FAAPCI
()IRI
()

PCI

()IRI
(H)(M)
()5~20m
(L)PCI40
7


()IRI PCI56

7
5 PCI(4)
84
(aintenance) 2007116
PCI
(Rating) (Repair Strategy) 2005728 2005818 200653

2008531
100

85 25,500m 54,000m 19,300m 120,000m
70
- - 72,088m2 -
55

40
IRI 20 IRI 20

2 2
IRI30 IRI50
25 PCI120 ()


6 FAAPCI(4) 1,275,000 2,700,000 965,000 6,000,000

PCI 100m
100m 100m 100mIRI
IRI
(1) 85100 IRI IRI
PCI
(2) 7085
IRI 0.81m/km 2.74m/km 3.6m/km 4.74m/km
(3) 5570
(4) 4055 IRI 6.96m/km 8.00m/km 20.0m/km 19.65m/km
(5) 2540 PCI - - 47 -
(6) 1025
(7) 010 PCI - - 88 -
1.PCI40
2.PCI60PCI70
232 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 233
7IRI25.5km 2004CNS 15046
54.0km19.3km120km 200612IRI PMS
20~50(84 3.(
10) )
PCI72,088m2120 2007
4.
5~6(120km IRI 91200211
) IRI 21

5.
IRI --
IRI 20073

IRI 6.ASTM E950, Standard Test Method for
ASTM IRI Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled
IRI4.50m/km IRIPCI Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established
Inertial Profiling Reference, 2004.
IRI
7.CNS 15046
200612
PCIIRI
IRI
1.

PCI PCI 2005
2005IRI IRIPCI 06
2006

2 2
PCIIRIPCI 2.
() (


PCI )200512

IRIPCI
PMS



IRIASTM E9501998

234 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 235


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY




5M(R=80m)


1
2

1 2 3


(
)()



2



161kv




(R=80m)

236 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 237


180mm) D=14.55)
12~19m (3)( 80m
) 1.55
161KV

5.65m5.5m
5.0m
O (R=80m)
25cm100cm()75cm(R=80m)
() OA>OGOHOD
2019m 5.65m()

R=80m(3)R=120m(3) 7.57mV
4
R=180m(1) 23
20m
17mX12m



B0+000~B2+019
VS-1

R=80m VS-2 R=80m



R=80m
2 4


VS-3

VS-4





VS-7
VS-5

1
30mm


2 VS-5
() 2


0.074%

12~13mVS-2VS-1
3
(1)
1650kN1650st
R=80m
181500kN250st16(
VS-510m
2.00.5) ()

(600mm) (R/D)(R/

(3,926 kN-m) D)20

(480mmX430mm) (R/D)35 5

( R80mD=5.5m(R/

238 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 239
1
()

(6)
5,500mm
R=80m
5,000mm250mm
9
180mm fc=420kg/cm26A3, B

CK1 GYVEL(
200mm7.17` R=80m )
37.7 75
200mm4.27 100m100 50m
22.5 7 (X,Y,Z)
(X,Y,Z)



(8)

2
2






8
7
240 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 241

R=80m 1.0m R=80m

Ds=5500mm 1.772m3R=80m

R=80m 1000mm1.5 (45mm)

35mm 1.0m

94.58mm35.76mm 0.511 m31.0m

25mm 1.772m3+0.511 m3=2.283 m3

28.8%

()



R=80mR=120m
10
()

K
R=80mK
()
111K


100mm13

12
1 R=80m
0.75m () R=120m
H V SQR(H^2+V^2) 0'00''00(H) (H) (V)
(TL)

TL60L1 0.625 0.000 0.625 0'37''30 2250 0 L

TL60L2 0.500 0.365 0.619 0'30''00 1800 1313 LD

TL60L3 0.198 0.594 0.626 0'11''53 713 2138 LD

10 TL60R3 0.198 0.594 0.626 0'11''53 713 (2138) RU

TL60R2 0.198 0.594 0.626 0'11''53 713 (2138) LU

2 2

TL60R1 0.500 0.365 0.619 0'30''00 1800 (1313) LU


15
()
3~4kg/cm2
13

214
12 ()

R=80m 14

R=80m

(75cm

135%
11 K
242 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 243
100cm)R=120mR ()
14R=120m



R=80m
15 R=80m
25mm
R=80m0.75m

18mm

R=80m

14







~ 1. 2006

5650mm(EPB)

2 2


15 2. 2005

5650mm


3. (1996)

()

244 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 245


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

()
(Project-oriented)

(MIS)(PM)(Smart PMIS)
(B2G)



1
2
3
4

1 2 3 4






(96)

2


(Project-oriented)


(MIS)(PM)
(Smart PMIS)(B2G)
(Smart PMIS)(B2G)


246 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 247


Smart _PMIS



















1 Smart_PMIS









()
Smart_PMIS
/


PROJECT 2 Smart_PMIS





()

()




2

Smart_PMIS
Web-Solution


Internet


ExplorerSmart_PMIS

2 2




E-MAIL




Smart_PMIS



3 Smart_PMIS




()
Smart_PMIS

()
1
3


248 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 249
(1) B2G )


(2)PCM


()

G2G95
(3) 2008
95
(4)


B2G
(5)


()/
() 92 MS excel


93

(97) ()(
)(
)
4 G2G
94 B2G

B2G

2 2
G2G
B2G


2
()5
()


94

G2G




/
4 Smart_PMIS B2G
(

250 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 251


5 6 B2G

B2G ()

B2G


6


()
Smart_PMISB2G

1.
WebPMIS

2
Smart_PMIS
2


Smart_

PMIS


2.
MIS



()

Smart_PMIS

252 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 253
7 8

(Dimension)



8
EXCEL


Smart_PMIS
7
Roll-Up

Drill-Down

2 2

1.(PMIS-XML)


2008
(
PCM
(MIS)(PM) 2.()

) (Smart_PMIS)(B2G) ......... 2008
5%


9651 3.

(Data () -94~97
Warehousing)(OLAP) 20052008

(Business Intelligence)

254 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 255


2
SPECIAL REPORT


SUMMARY

(
CECI)89

CECI


89CECI

4
1 2 3 4

CECI


CECI
CECI



2


CECI
CECI

eInternetIntranet CECI
ISO
2001
89 IBM
CECI (CKO)(LaurencePrusak)

(Working Knowledge)(
256 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 257
ThomasH. Davenport)[1]
94
SOS



(
(2)[3] )







CECI

1 CECI(Evolution)
(The Knowledge Creating

Company)[2]



()




2 3 CECI


CECI

CECI

2 2


CECI (1) 10


89 10

90
CECI87 3

CECI30
90 GIS
CECI
DTM/
e

258 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 259
()
(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting)
[4](1) ()
S
()
KM=(P+K)--------------------------- (1)

KM: Knowledge Management ()
P: People
K: Knowledge ()(e-Learning)
+: Technology
S: Share () 5



()
KGP60

KGP/ 6
()

(1)

(5)

SOS
S()(P+K)

CECI ()

92KM(4) 100%
1.
84%840( 75%50%25%0% 2.
3.
1/2) 285( (6) 4.1~3

1/5) ()

CECI
SOS

2
CECI

2



KGP30


/ 8 SOS



//
SOS
/
CECI





CECI
(Knowledge Growing PointKGP)[5] 7 SOS



4 92KM 7
260 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 261
SOS
Frans KGP
Johansson KGP 94KGP
[6] 93~96
(14)79%89%
103%1%
10 99.25%
60~120 KGP


9
119681.06
CECI (SOS)48%
()7%
KGP

(8)

1213
CECIKM 12 96/
KGP

9KGP 10
9234793 (Anytime)(Anywhere)
1512941650 (on Any Devices)
(1)1650

13 96/

2 2


11 96(81.06)

92


8 CECI
14 93 ~ 96
262 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 263
PFT

()
SOS9361090 IAT()
822 () IFT
KMS KMS ()
KMS L N

SOS KMS STT= ORTSi + HRTSk +FATS


i 1 k 1

------------------------------------------------ (4)
SOS

L
NDT  NDS
TB (%) u 100% ----- (2) N
NDT
i:ORTSii
NDT()
k:HRTSkk
NDSSOS ()
()SOS
16 SOS ORTsiSOS
CECISOS ()
TB(%)
HRTSkSOS

()
(15)SOS(16) (KMS) () FATSSOS
(Man hour)
SOS ()
SOS KMS STTSOS()
(3)SOS
(4) (5)

TTT  STT
(SOS) TTT=[(NDTMCTMPT)+(MNTMTT MHB(%) u 100%
TTT
2 2
[7] MPT)]+[(PATPFT)]+[(IATIFT)]
------------------------------------------------ (5)
---------------------------------------------- (3)


SOS654 MHB(%)
TTT(hr)
()
MPT()

MCT

()

MNT
SOS
()
(6)SOS
MTT()
(7)
PAT()

15
264 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 265
( NDT u MCT u MPT )  (MN T u MTT u MPT )
TTC u EAR
 ( PA T u PFT )  ( IAT u IFT ) CECI
SOS
--------------------------------------------- (6)

27,586CECI
NDTMCTMPTMNTPATPFT
SOS
IATIFTMTT(3)

EAR(/hr)
CECIKMSSOS
TTC()
SOS

STC=

L

(ORT
i 1
Si u EUR)  ( FAT u EUR) 17

-------------------------------------------------(7)

ORTSiFATS SOS 3. (2006)
CECI89
EUR(/)

71172
STCSOS()

181
KGP
(8)
4.(Arthur Andersen Business
TTC  STC
CB(%) u 100% Consulting)/ (2000)
TTC



--------------------------------------------------(8)
5. (2006)
TTCSTC CECIKMSOS

CB(%) CECI
72186199

2 2
CECI
6.Frans Johansson(2005)
CECI96.5.1


-The Medici Effect

1./ 7.
(1999) (2007)PISP
SOS (Working Knowledge)

93.6~97.11822 SOS

SOS 2.
2267.55 (1997)
17
266 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 267

400
SI

Word(
) ()5-6,0002.5312
1.5

l23







1
1



()6,000(A48())

12Table 1Figure2




81
(l) 20
141-151

(1983)

BazantZ.P.and ohB.H.,Strain-rate effect in rapid triaxial loading of concreteJournal of
Engineering MechanicsASCEVol.108No.5,pp.764-782(1982).
(2)
177-184(1987) (81)
Zienkiewicz,O.C.,The Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill,London,PP.257-295(1977)
(3) CECI
T71
25-30(1982) 20
Nasu, M., and Tamura,T.,Vibration test of the underground pipe with a comparatively large cross-section, 20
Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,Rome,Italy,PP.583-592(1973)
(4)
(1982)
Lin,C.H.,Rational for limits to reinforcement of tied concrete column,Ph.D.Dissertation, DePartment of Civil 482
Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, Texas (1984).

(5)

No.53 (1983)
Thompson,J.P.,Fire resistance of reinforced concrete floorsPCA Report,Chicago, U.S.A.,pp.1-15(1963).

268 No.81 January, 2009 No.81 January, 2009 269



106
18527

82
: 98430

270 No.81 January, 2009

You might also like