Professional Documents
Culture Documents
or
+
-
Effect of (P+I) control on transient
and steady state response
Method: *similar to previous*
Ki=0.5 Ki=2.0
Kp e(t)
S1 S2,3 S1 S2,3
0.5 -0.937 -0.13 0.19i -1.09 -0.054 0.42i 0.00
1 -0.873 -0.16 0.30i -1.15 -0.023 0.59i 0.00
2 -0.756 -0.22 0.46i -1.24 0.019 0.80i 0.00
4 -0.624 -0.29 0.75i -1.34 0.071 1.09i 0.00
6 -0.577 -0.31 0.97i -1.41 0.106 1.30i 0.00
8 -0.555 -0.32 1.16i -1.46 0.132 1.47i 0.00
10 -0.543 -0.33 1.32i -1.50 0.153 1.62i 0.00
Effect of (P+I) control on transient
and steady state response
PI Simulator
Effect of (P+I) control on transient
and steady state response
*For Ki = 2.0 and values of Kp above 1, the system is
actually unstable*
When Ki is set to very small value the response is
almost the same as with no integral control
But over a period of time the error is integrated causing
the output to rise slowly
In this case the proportional part reduces the steady
state error quickly but not completely and then the
remaining error is eliminated slowly by the integrator
If we increase Ki without reducing Kp, the steady state
error is reduced more rapidly but the system becomes
more oscillatory and may become unstable.
By adjusting Ki and Kp we can reduce the settle time
without forcing the system to become too oscillatory.
Effect of (P+I) control on transient
and steady state response
Summary:
In general increasing Ki steady state error is
reduced more rapidly.
Increasing Ki by too much may make the
system oscillatory and even unstable.
The 3 terms Controller (PID)
The benefits of integral and differential action are
complementary and are often brought together in a single
controller known as PID controller.
The general controller transfer function is:
or
+
-
Example 23