Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In the actual teaching of my lesson, the first half went almost exactly as planned. I asked
the planned discussion questions and additional guiding questions based on student responses.
The students gave accurate responses when I modeled filling out the peer evaluation form
using my own piece of writing, so I figured they were ready to complete their own peer
evaluations. When I set them free to do so, I found that many of them were not clear on the
instructions, so I had to explain them in a different way. This was especially necessary for the
English Language Learners in the class. An additional change that I had to make in order to
make my lesson accessible to ELLs was to mix up one of the pairings. I paired one of the ELLs
with an English-speaking boy in hope that he could help her to understand the directions and
task. While the pairing was helpful for this purpose, it was not helpful for other reasons. They
were supposed to read each others papers and fill out the peer evaluations accordingly, but the
English-speaking student was not able to read the other students paper because it contained
mostly broken English. In order to adapt on the fly, I had them both work together to complete
the peer evaluation for the English-speaking students paper. This seemed to work more
effectively. Lastly, I had to cut off the last portion of my lesson due to time restraints. They were
not able to revise their papers based on the evaluations; they only had time to fill out the
evaluations.
If I were to teach this lesson again, I could incorporate developmentally appropriate
practice in a more thorough way by making directions clearer and spelled out. Although I
verbally told the students to continue onto the back if there were more than six sentences in
the paper, many of them did not do so. Next time, I would create a larger table so that students
would have well-defined space to continue their evaluations. Furthermore, I would change the
evaluation to better reflect the abilities of the students in the class. In fourth grade, they are
working on sentence structure, punctuation, and capitalization. In many cases, the students
individual sentences were hard to distinguish because the majority of the students did not
correctly punctuate and capitalize; therefore, labeling sentences with sequential numbers was
not helpful for all students. Next time, I would give the students space to write out the entire
sentences. This would also give the authors feedback of where to add punctuation and
capitalization so their sentences are clearer.
Due to the assessment I created for this lesson, I have a hard time determining my
impact on student learning. This is because I was not able to get to the revision part, so my
original assessment could not be used. Based on the new check sheet that I created following
the lesson, I can conclude that students understood how to fill out the evaluation, but the
ambiguity in sentences made it difficult for them to evaluate effectively. The peer evaluations
themselves serve as evidence for this conclusion. I learned more through my informal
observations as the students completed the evaluations. Most of them were working together
and even providing verbal feedback to their peers about how they could change certain
sentences to stay on topic. I could tell that they understood Because of Thursday and its tie to
the lesson of staying on topic. All discussion questions were answered accurately. If I were the
classroom teacher, I would continue teaching how to stay on topic and connect it with working
on main idea sentences and supporting details.
Teaching this lesson on how to stay on topic while writing has taught me a valuable
lesson about giving instructions. I gave the instructions verbally, put them on the Promethean
Board, and modeled filling out the peer evaluation with my own piece of writing. After I
finished giving instructions and set the students free to complete the task, I had five or so
students ask what they were supposed to be doing. I learned that students need instructions
worded in different ways, rather than in just a variety of formats. Next time, I would check for
understanding of instructions before setting students free. One way to do this would be to say,
Turn to your neighbor and tell them what youre supposed to be doing. I would wait for a
minute or so and then ask if anyone has any questions for me. I learned that students will not
always speak up if they do not understand the instructions, so it is my job as the teacher to
provide alternate explanations for understanding.
As I planned and delivered this lesson, I learned a valuable lesson about teaching.
Sometimes a lesson takes more time to carry out than you originally plan for. I thought my
lesson would work well for groups of 30 minutes each, but my students were not able to get to
the most important part of the lesson where they could show what they learned: the revision
section. While it is better to have more than enough planned than not enough, it is essential
that every lesson has a beneficial purpose. In my own classroom, my time constraints would
not be as strict. If I were giving this lesson in my own classroom, I may be able to take the first
part of the next day to have students revise their papers.
Through the experience of giving this lesson, I learned something about myself as a
teacher. I noticed while I was asking discussion questions that I tended to call on the same
student numerous times because he was giving good responses. As I grow in my journey as an
educator, I need to encourage all students to share their thoughts and ideas without fear of
being wrong. I need to work on my guiding questions so that I can help students to reach the
answers by themselves without explicitly giving the answers. Lastly, I need to work on asking
more open-ended questions so there is more than one right answer and students have an
opportunity to learn from each other.
Observation Form
Student Name Observations of Student Learning
Check sheet:
(This was added because the students did not get to revise their papers. They only filled out
the peer evaluations.)
The student The student The student
accurately somewhat did not
filled out the accurately accurately fill
peer filled out the out the peer
Student Name evaluation. peer evaluation OR Comments
evaluation. did not
complete it.
Rubric: Staying on Topic
1 Area of 2 Developing 3 Meeting 4 Exceeding
Concern
The writer used The writer used The writer used
The writer did the peer the comments the peer
not revise their evaluation to made on their evaluation to
own writing OR adjust sentences own to adjust adjust their own
the revisions in their writing. sentences in writing (directly
Student Name
that they made Some of these their writing. relating to the
& Comments did not address revisions These revised topic) and made
the main topic directly related sentences helpful
of to the topic. directly relate to comments to
their writing. the topic of their their peer to
paragraph. help them
adjust their
writing.
Good Writers Stay on Topic!
(Just like Patricia Polacco)
Author: _______________________________
Peer Evaluator: ____________________________
Topic: ______________________________
Miss Davisons Writing Sample:
My favorite part of the game is the feeling you get when you hit
a good shot across the net.