Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Using a dissection kit to compare the digestive anatomy of minks, rats, pigeons, rabbits,
frogs, lampreys and necturus to understand the lifestyle of these chosen vertebrates. It was found
that the comparative anatomy of the organisms accurately depicted what their ecology and diet
would be like, based off of the length of the body versus the length of the digestive system.
Introduction
The purpose of the vertebrate digestive lab was to compare the anatomy of different
organisms to further understand what makes their digestive organs structured so differently from
each other. These varying morphologies reflect the ecology and behavior of these animals and
determines what sort of lifestyle they have. The digestive organs and general anatomy were
viewed through dissection in the lab, using the appropriate dissecting kits that were required.
Along with this was the species to be dissected, including; necturus, pigeon, rat, rabbit, mink,
lamprey, sharks, and frog. One main aspect of the dissection process was to obtain the total
length of the assigned animal, the length of its mouth to anus, and the actual length of the
digestion, meaning some have structures to digest diets that the others would not be able to
consume. For example, the pigeon contained an organ known as a gizzard. The avian digestive
system has a mouth (beak), crop (for food storage), and gizzard (for breakdown), as well as a
two-chambered stomach consisting of the proventriculus, which releases enzymes, and the true
stomach, which finishes the breakdown (Boundless. Vertebrate Digestive Systems. Boundless
Biology. Boundless, 26 May. 2016. Retrieved 27 Nov. 2016). Inside a birds stomach, the
gizzard is specifically structured to grind up seeds, the main element in many bird diets.
Interestingly enough however, alligators and crocodiles also contain a gizzard due to their
absence of teeth specified for grinding, ("Animals With Gizzards." Animals - Mom.me. N.p., n.d.
Web).
The birds and select reptiles that have a gizzard are a good example for comparative
anatomy.
Organisms may share a similar morphology either because they inherited it from a
common ancestor (homology) or because they use it for a similar function (analogy).
Comparative anatomy is one means of assessing whether shared features are homologies or
analogies ("Laboratory Exercise 9: Comparative Anatomy of the Vertebrate Digestive System."
Biodiversity & Evolution Lab Manual. Galloway: Richard Stockton U, 2016. 123. Print. BIOL
1405.)
So, the question remains, is the gizzard an analogous structure or an homologous
structure? A hypothesis for the answer being that it is both analogous and homologous seems
appropriate. For the analogy side, the gizzard is being used in both birds and select reptiles
because of the lack of grinding teeth and need for the extra breakdown of food. On the
homologous side, it is very possible that the common ancestor of birds and reptiles,
Archaeopteryx, contained a gizzard. Archaeopteryx had a full set of teeth unlike birds, but once
again teeth for digging in, rather than grinding, thus a gizzard would make sense.
The length of a digestive system also hints to what a vertebrate diet might consist of. One
big deviation in the length of the digestive tract is the comparison of carnivores and herbivores.
Meat is relatively easy to break down after being chewed up by the predator, so carnivores are
expected to have a simple digestive system. On the other hand, plants are more difficult and
time-consuming to digest, so the digestive tract tends to be significantly longer than carnivores to
provide enough time to acidify the food and collect nutrients. Herbivores have a more
specialized digestive system than that of a carnivore because it is more difficult to digest
vegetation than meat. The teeth are flat so that grass and plant material can be ground down,
rather than the sharp teeth of carnivores designed to tear flesh ("Digestive System of Herbivores
Direction were followed from the procedures in the Stockton Lab Manual, ("Laboratory Exercise
9: Comparative Anatomy of the Vertebrate Digestive System." Biodiversity & Evolution Lab
Data from procedures are shown on the last page of this lab report
Conclusion/Discussion
The purpose of this lab was to develop an understanding of the morphology of vertebrates
and use comparative anatomy to determine the ecology and diet of the provided organisms. The
following was determined; mammals tend to have the most complex digestive systems,
herbivores more so than carnivores. Rabbits, the only mammal provided that is strictly an
herbivore, had the most significant spike digestive length compared to total body length. The
difference being the rabbits body length at 52 cm and the digestive length at 432 cm, nowhere
near the deviation between body and digestive length of the other provided organisms. Although
the mammal carnivores had less of a complex digestive system compared to herbivores, they
The pigeon had a body length of 32 cm and a digestion length of 41, being less complex
than predictable based on the addition of a gizzard for the grinding of seeds. The most simple
digestive system of the provided organisms was the lampreys, which had equal measurements of
43 cm for the total length of its body, mouth to anus, and total digestive tract. Their lack of jaw
and diet consisting of sucking blood provides a simple diet, not requiring much digestive
processes ("Sea Lampreys, Petromyzon Marinus." MarineBio.org. N.p., n.d. Web). The frog and
necturus shared similar deviations in numbers, which points a finger at them sharing similar
ecology and diets, ultimately supporting the hypothesis that the necturus is an amphibian based
simply off of viewing its digestive system in comparison with the frogs. Lastly, the shark was
the only organism to have such a short digestive length, 33 cm, compared with the body total, 69
cm. This could be due to its streamlined body not requiring as much time to break down the fish
Interestingly enough, the comparative anatomy accurately depicted the ecology and diet
Necturus 29 cm 20 cm 29cm
Frog 12 cm 12 cm 19 cm
Lamprey 43 cm 43 cm 43 cm
Shark 69 cm 34 cm 33 cm
Pigeon 32 cm 20 cm 41 cm
Rat 33 cm 17 cm 82 cm
Rabbit 52 cm 52 cm 432 cm
Mink 55 cm 39 cm 145 cm
Literature Cited