bition one wonders why that most bea
clarity, warmth and light i dimly lit in a gray and moody twilight. I this athe-
atrical trick to create a setting of “Northern Romantic" ight, meant to obscure?
‘What mental semitrance are we supposed to enter before we are allowed to
«mmbark on wandering down the spiral of 24 Staions (whose martyrium, whose
_mysterium)? Pethaps we ae prevented from seeing belated automatist drawings
‘on the walls, pompously framed in chthonic ron, and weathered, withering relics
Benjamin H.D, Buchloh
Appendix
BEUYS: THE TWILIGHT OF THE [DOL
Preliminary Notes for a Critique
‘Theft that peopl in Germany deceive themselves concerning Wigner does ot su
rise me. Te revere would surprise m. The Germans have modeled a Wager or
‘themselves, whom they ca nor never yet hae they been pychlagis hey re
‘han thar they misunderstand Bu thas pple shoud aso dave serves
oncerning Wager Paris? Where people rear anything else than psyco
ts... How intimately related must Wagner bt the entie decadence of Europe
{for her not to have eat he was dent, He ong tthe isis proagons
its goetest name. Al hate wold needs mst toscana inthe most
seductive manner in is arte trv great sila of evansed peopl: atl
‘ns artifiiality and innocence (dae)... Wagner est une nvrve
_—Fiedtich Nietsche, The Caseof Wagner!
RING THESE DAYS OF THE
[Guggenheim Museums Beuys exhi
1 building, normally beaming with
199
Dron Nore
ein HD. Bache "Bans The
“wig he, Pray Nes
foreCrie ie ayadin
‘va 9 are rapn Boe
"oop a Soin
Chge a Win ar to
‘oa Bay! Ame np
ota donning etal
feng ein, Bs
sic domme
Sundin of te Carman apc
‘om i to enh
tras pron We ach
‘towing perhaps ead ce
‘eto mrt ati th
‘hh her eed ome
ees simpaonthss se
‘rt wert sing,
‘ewes Cpe Pips
‘ogee rer oul rs
theo lgering an ct
eva eas and hes
‘nate offen wos in
‘orn nes he opin po
Ssh dye tata
rer ons aoe
"vl ere a
nats owe see
tind heen uhih eer
‘ahr trance stoping
‘onpemens CR,
1 rec Siete, The Cie of
Wage in The Compe Wr of
re es Ox
tener moe
Thelderf cing ph Bes
Inthe tad of Reurd
igs prope ye te
Marl roster pb
‘tert oh es,
Disedert Ober. 97
Pineda ra
geet Pius by Nace
rode Passsce erp of Yes
Hisnbworkon te coun of
Benjamin HD. Bachloh 200
nd vestiges of past activities, which might be “souvenirs of aif of spectacle poor
dead things. Breft ofthe confectioner, the life of his art has vanished”?
‘The presentation of the souvenirs, however, is most elaborate. Enshrine.
specifically designed glass and wood cases that look like across between vtrnes
in Victorian muscums of ethnography and display cases in turn-of-the-century
boarding schools, the objects, or rather their containers, signal to the viewer:
yyouare entering interior spaces, the realm of archetypal memories, an historic
communion. Ahistoricity, that unconscious or deliberate obliviousness toward
the specifi conditions that determine the reality of an individual's being and
‘work in historical time, isthe functional basis on which public and private
mythologies can be erected, presuming that a public exists that craves myths in
proportion to its lack of comprehension of historic actuality. The ahistorie
mythology of fascism, to give an example from political history, could only
develop and gain credibility asa response to the chilistic and debauched hopes
of the starving and uneducated masses of the German Weimar Republic and
postmonarchic Italy. Veneration for leaders grows out of the experiences of
severe deficiency.
‘The private and public mythology of Joseph Beuys, to give an example from
‘art history, could only be developed and maintained on the ahistoricity of
esthetic production and consumption in postwar Europe. The substantially
retarded comprehension of European Dada and Russian Constructivism, and
their political as well as their epistemological implications, determined both
European and! American art up until the late 1950s and served for both produc-
cersand recipients asa basis for mythifying subsequent esthetic work, Once put
into their proper historie context, these works would lose their mystery and
seemingly metaphysical origin and could be judged more appropriately for their
actual formal and material, thats historical, achievements within the situation
and the specific point of development of the discourse into which they insert
‘themselves. The public myth of Beuys life and work, by now having achieved
proportions that make any attempt to question it orto put it into historic per-
spective an almost impossible critical task, isa result ofthese conditions just as
it tries to perpetuate them by obscuring historical factcity. This very atitude,
however, of making the artist a cult figure, historicizes Beuys and aligns him
with representatives of his own generation in Europe during the 1950s who were
quay grand masters ofthe public spectacle: figures lke Yves Klein and Georges
Mathieu. No other artist (with the possible exception of Andy Warhol, who cer-
tainly generated a totally different kind of myth) managed—and probably never
intended—to puzzle and scandalize his primarity bourgeois art audience tothe201 beuys: THE TwiL:
Ar OF THE IDOL
extent that he would become a figure of worship. No other artist also tried and
succeeded so systematically in aligning himself at a given time with esthetic and
political eurrents, absorbing them into his myth and work and thereby neutral-
iting and estheticizing them. Everybody who was seriously involved in radical
student polities during 1960s in Germany, for example, and who worked on the
development of a new and adequate political theory and practice laughed at or
derided Beuys’ public-relations move to found the Grand Student Party, which
\was supposed to return an air of radicality to the master who was coming of
‘esthetic age. Nobody who understands any contemporary science, polities or
esthetics for that matter, could want to seein Beuys' proposal for an integration.
of art, scence and polities —as his program for the Free International University
ddemands—anything more than simple-minded utopian drivel lacking elemen-
tary political and educational practicality. Beuys’ existential and ideological fol-
lowers and admirers, as opposed to his bourgeois collectors and speculators, are
blindfolded like cultists by their eader’s charisma, As usual with charisma, this
seems to be nothing buta psychic interaction between hyperactive unconscious
Processes at the edge of sanity and the zombielike existence of supposed nor-
‘ality in which individuation has been totally extinguished, so it scems per=
fectly necessary to become a “follower” of whomever seems to be alive. Ernst
Bloch, the German philosopher, when talking about Beuys’ philosophical mas-
ter Rudolf Steiner, gives an exact description of those processes that constitute
the mythical figure and the cult, and this portrayal seems to describe Beuys
word-for-word
Wis nt suprising to meet peculiar dreamers. They ae sufficiently disrupted t be
‘open for unconditioned experiences. |The dreamer] tends to remove lrontces of
everyday life so that it can cover the unussl with the ordinary and vice versa. The
slvided self accumulates a feeling of sin whose power seems almost forgotten and
“unfathomable. The internalized super-ego the pride aid certainty of mimic messiah
‘that those characters develop, would never be attained by any notmal being, even in
states of highest mental exaltation, No flse Demetrius woul maintain himself for
Jong, but a fase fesus among madmen will da well... The occult journalist Rudolf
‘Steiner established himelf atthe top ofthe "Cognition of Higher Words" particu:
lurlyodd cas. A mediere,but unsupportable ody yt effcient..as though some
‘ten druids were chatting on newsprint paper.
As to Beuys, the cul and the myth seem to have become inseparable from the
‘work, and as his confusion of art and life sa deliberate programmatic position,
an “integration” to be achieved by everybody it seems appropriate t0 take ay tang Bch ou erieip