Professional Documents
Culture Documents
International Journal of
Psychology
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/pijp20
To cite this article: Alfredo V. Lagmay (1984) Western Psychology in the Philippines:
Impact and Response, International Journal of Psychology, 19:1-4, 31-44
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the Content) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
International Journal of Psychology 19 (1984)31-44 31
North-Holland
Alfred0 V. LAGMAY
University of Ihe Philippines, Philippines
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
The history of psychological science in the Philippines is considered as a case of cultural diffusion
from the West through the English language and the institutions (educational and legal, business
and industry, the media, government and the bureaucracy) which adopted the language. The
development of academic and professional psychology and of psychology-related services has been
phenomenal, particularly in the last decade. It has however, given rise. to problems of (1)standards
and validity in testing and research, and (2) applicability of concepts and methods in social
psychology the roots of which are from another culture. Current trends and issues, as well the
movement for indigenous Philippine social psychology, are briefly described.
Introduction
This paper is based on materials gathered with the assistance of a grant-in-aid from the
Philippine Social Science Council which is hereby gratefully acknowledged.
Authors address: A.V. Lagmay, Dept. of Psychology, University of the Philippines, Diliman,
Quaon City 3004, Philippines.
In 1974, the University of the Philippines began its Ph.D. program with
concentration in experimental, social or clinical psychology, and
graduated its first Ph.D., an American, in 1979. In 1982 the University
awarded five Ph.D. degrees in psychology.
The phenomenal increase of interest in psychology may be traced to
the fact that many students turned to undergraduate psychology pro-
grams as a preparation for entry into medical schools, after the govern-
ment abolished the two-year premedical cumculum and imposed a
bachelors degree requirement for admission to medical schools. This
was a national requirement so that all universities were suddenly faced
with an enormous influx of students into psychology. Many of these
students found their way into graduate schools, but the greater number
A. V. Logmay / Western psychology in the Philippines 35
pines 1980), there are over 200 psychological testing companies now
that offer this kind of service. These do not include the numerous
human resources development groups servicing professionals, business-
men and educated lay groups with transactional analysis, T-groups,
meditational and relaxation sessions, group dynamics, and the like.
The Philippine Psychological Corporation now serves about 500
companies through its testing facilities and materials. The Personnel
and Managers Association of the Philippines has its own psychological
service facilities for middle and top executive groups.
On the other hand, the Development Academy of the Philippines
(DAP), which is the major development and training arm of the
Philippine government and the president of which is also concurrently
the Minister of Education and Culture, has adopted already for some
five years now the Assessment Center Method of Development Dimen-
sions (Asean) International for executives in the civil service system.
Also, more recently, the DAP had considered introducing behavior
modelling for productivity methods, which promises to become
widespread among Philippine management and labor.
Meanwhile, the Psychological Association of the Philippines has
grown apace in number, from the mere ten founders to something like
350 members.
Forming a distribution and network of cultural purveyors of an
entire way of thinking about people, relationships and processes, psy-
chology-related services in varying degrees of sophistication have be-
come one of the most pervasive phenomena in Philippine society. The
magnitude and variety available to the public has grown to such
proportions that the PAP had taken the self-assessment of the state of
psychology as the theme of at least two of its annual conventions: in
36 A. V. Logmay / Western psychology in the Philippines
1978 during which the theme was The Practice of Psychology in the
Philippines: Current Trends and New Directions, and in 1980, The
Practice of Psychology in the 1980s.
Almost all of the research that has been published in psychology is in
English. A cursory inspection of the references of the Philippine Journal
of Psychology shows entries of AmeriGan authors mostly, with a few
references to local authors, who in turn use American sources. A survey
of Philippine social scientists by Lauby et al. (1981) showed that local
research studies were rated as the most useful followed by locally
authored textbooks. But again an actual examination of sample texts
and locally authored papers reveals predominantly American refer-
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
ences.
The only notable exception is the new movement in Philippine
psychology under the leadership of Enriquez who has -published the
proceedings of the Pambansang Samahan sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (Na-
tional Association for Philippine Psychology) in the national language.
zation and adequacy in the education and training of those who teach
and render service in the discipline. The last three annual conventions
of the PAP devoted much time and effort to these problems.
American tests that were brought over for use in the Philippines were
perceived earlier as problems merely of norms. Target groups were rank
ordered in aptitude and intelligence tests scores, but with personality
inventories and similar tests with high culture-specific loadings, this
maneuver obviously was not feasible. Furthermore, most practitioners
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
soon realized that when one went out to test people who did not have a
good comprehension of the English language, such as lower socio-eco-
nomic or rural groups, the instruments were not interpretable for
purposes of classification, diagnosis or counselling. There had been
attempts at translations into Filipino of the Wechsler Bellevue, the
Stanford-Binet, and even the MMPI, but no one was really sure if he
was measuring validly.
The most important of these problems in the area of. testing, of
course, has been the National College Entrance Examination (NCEE)
which is administered by the National Testing Center every year to
nearly 745,000 high school graduates. The NCEE is in English, and,
considering the rather wide variations in levels of student English
mastery in the different regions of the country, this test has posed quite
a problem for some educators who see in this testing requirement a
possible violation of the rights of the student in having his future
determined by a test that is flawed by essential validity problems due to
the language factor. I posed this question on various occasions with
responsible officials of the National Testing Center and the Fund for
Assistance to Private Education, and they recognize the problem, which
is complex and difficult. But it must await future resolution when there
are more resources for a concerted attack on this basic issue.
their historical roots, and this problem has been dealt with previously in
a number of conferences already.
The search for validity of psychological concepts across cultures has
been a continuing task. One approach that has been frequently fol-
lowed by researchers, whether by foreigners or by culture-bearers, is to
design a research project, implement its field execution and interpret
the data through the help of indigenous participants. This has been
done in the Philippines so extensively by both foreign and local
scholars that it is almost a trite truism.
For added sophistication in methodology, they also propose that the
study be exploratory and that the concepts be generated from the data
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
Conclusions
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
References
Amor, B.L., N. Santiago and L. Gatmaitan (eds.), 1981. Focus on mental health resources.
(Directory of Philippine agencies engaged in promotion and development of mental health.)
Quezon City: Philippine Mental Health Association.
Bulatao, J.. 1966. Westernization and the split-level personality of the Filipino. Paper read at the
Conference on Mental Health in Asia, East-West Center, Honolulu.
Bulatao. J., 1978. Teaching teachers to teach psychology in the Philippines. Paper read at the 15th
Annual Convention of Psychological Association of the Philippines, Aug. 3-5.
Bulatao. J., 1979. Relevance in Philippine psychology. Paper read at the 16th Annual Convention
of the Psychological Association of the Philippines, Oct. 11-13.
Carreon, M.L., 1926. Philippine studies in mental measurement. New York: World Book Co.
Enriquez, V.G., 1976. Research priorities in psychology. Proceedings of the National Research
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
Limcaco, E.R., 1962. University of the Philippines Scholastic Aptitude Examination (JPSAW).
part I: mental ability. (Rev. ed.) Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Llana, L.A., de la, 1972. Ang kalakaran at pag-unlad ng sikolohiya ng Universidad ng Pilipinas,
1922-1972. Pananaliksik sa sikolohiya. [The development of psychology in the Universtiy of
the Philippines, 1922-1972. Research in psychology.] Diliman: Limbagan ng Universidad.
Morawski, J.G., 1979. The structure of social psychological communities. In: L.H.Strickland
(ed.), Soviet and Western perspectives in social psychology. pp. 25-56.
Padilla, L., 1955. Mental ability test for Philippine secondary schools. Department of Psychology,
University of the Philippines.
Padilla, S.G. and E. Aldaba-Lim, 1961. State and trends in psychology in the Philippines. In:
Proceedings of the 1961- Science and Technology Week, Area VI. Manila: National Science
Development Board.
Psychological Association of the Philippines, 1978. Papers Read at the 15th Annual Convention.
Downloaded by [University of Exeter] at 14:49 10 August 2015
August 3-5. Theme: The Practice of Psychology in the Philippines: Current Trends and New
Directions.
Psychological Association of the Philippines, 1979. Papers Read at the 16th Annual Convention.
October 11-13. Theme: The Relevance of Western Psychological Concepts Applied in the
Philippines and Indigenous Philippine Concepts.
Psychological Association of the Philippines, 1980. Papers Read at the 17th Annual Convention,
August 25-27. Theme: The Practice of Psychology in the 1980s.
Rosales-Rosqueta, L., 1982. Personal communication.
Santamaria, J.O.,1961. Psychology in the Philippines. Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of the
Philippines, Quaon City.
Sechrest, L. and G.M. Guthrie, 1974. Psychology of, by, and for Filipinos. Philippine studies:
geography, archeology, psychology, and literature, Report No. 10. Center for Southeast Asian
Studies. Northern Illinois University.
Strickland, L.H. (ed.),1979. Soviet and Western perspectives in social psychology. New York:
Pergamon Press.
Valisno, M.D.,1979. Social policy implications of the National College Entrance Examination
(NCEE). In the Relevance of Western Concepts Applied in the Philippines and Indigenous
Philippine Concepts. Paper read in the. 16th Annual Convention of the Psychological Associa-
tion of the Philippines, Oct. 11-13.
Vasquez-de Jesus, Ma. L., 1980. The Psychological Association of the Philippines survey of
psychology graduates. Report on PAP commissioned study funded by the Fund Assistance for
Private Education, August.
Lhistoire de la psychologie aux Philippines est consideree comme un cas de diffusion culturelle a
partir de Iouest a travers la langue anglaise et les institutions qui ont adopte cette langue
(institution deducation et de droit, les affaires et industrie, la presse, le gouvernement et la
bureaucratie). Le developpement de la psychologie academique et professionnelle et des services
lies a la psychologie a ete tnonne, particulkement au cours de la demiere dkennie. Cela a
cependant donne naissance a certains problernes quant (i) aux normes et a la validite des tests et de
la recherche et (ii) h lapplicabilite des concepts et methodes dune psychologie sociale dont les
racines plongent dans une autre culture. Les tendances actuelles, mmme cells par exemple dune
psychologie sociale Philippine indigtne, sont dkrites bribement.