COMPUTE Jumlah = KP1 + KP2 + KP3 + KP4 + KP5 + KP6 + KP7 + KP8 + KP9 + KP10

+ KP11 + KP12 + KP13 + KP14 + KP15 + KP16 + KP17 + KP18 + KP19 + KP20 +
KP21 + KP22 + KP23 + KP24 + KP25 .
EXECUTE .
FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=Jumlah
/STATISTICS=STDDEV MINIMUM MAXIMUM MEAN MEDIAN SKEWNESS SESKEW
/HISTOGRAM NORMAL
/ORDER= ANALYSIS .

Frequencies
[DataSet0]

Statistics

Jumlah
N Valid 32
Missing 0
Mean 79.00
Median 78.00
Std. Deviation 4.429
Skewness .071
Std. Error of Skewness .414
Minimum 72
Maximum 87

Jumlah

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 72 2 6.3 6.3 6.3
73 2 6.3 6.3 12.5
75 7 21.9 21.9 34.4
76 1 3.1 3.1 37.5
78 5 15.6 15.6 53.1
80 2 6.3 6.3 59.4
82 4 12.5 12.5 71.9
83 4 12.5 12.5 84.4
84 1 3.1 3.1 87.5
85 2 6.3 6.3 93.8
86 1 3.1 3.1 96.9
87 1 3.1 3.1 100.0
Total 32 100.0 100.0
 Histogram

6
Frequency

RECODE
0
Jumlah 70 75 80 85 90
(79 thru Highest=1) (ELSE=0) INTO
Jumlah Kinerja.Perawat .
EXECUTE .
FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=USIA LAMA.KERJA STATUS.KEPEGAWAIAN Kinerja.Perawat
/ORDER= ANALYSIS .

Frequencies
[DataSet1] E:\Projek Statistik\12 - Desember (2014)\Projek Baru
4\Hasil\Olah Data.sav

Statistics

STATUS.
KEPEGA Kinerja.
USIA LAMA.KERJA WAIAN Perawat
N Valid 32 32 32 32
Missing 0 0 0 0
Frequency Table

USIA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid <=25tahun 10 31,3 31,3 31,3
>25tahun 22 68,8 68,7 100,0
Total 32 100,0 100,0

LAMA.KERJA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid <=5tahun 9 28,1 28,1 28,1
>5tahun 23 71,9 71,9 100,0
Total 32 100,0 100,0

STATUS.KEPEGAWAIAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid PNS 11 34,4 34,4 34,4
Non-PNS 21 65,6 65,6 100,0
Total 32 100,0 100,0

Kinerja.Perawat

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < nilai tengah 17 53,1 53,1 53,1
>= nilai tengah 15 46,9 46,9 100,0
Total 32 100,0 100,0
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=USIA LAMA.KERJA STATUS.KEPEGAWAIAN BY Kinerja.Perawat
/FORMAT= AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTIC=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS= COUNT ROW
/COUNT ROUND CELL .

Crosstabs
[DataSet1] E:\Projek Statistik\12 - Desember (2014)\Projek Baru
4\Hasil\Olah Data.sav

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
USIA * Kinerja.Perawat 32 100,0% 0 ,0% 32 100,0%
LAMA.KERJA * Kinerja.
32 100,0% 0 ,0% 32 100,0%
Perawat
STATUS.KEPEGAWAIAN
32 100,0% 0 ,0% 32 100,0%
* Kinerja.Perawat

USIA * Kinerja.Perawat

Crosstab

Kinerja.Perawat
>= nilai
< nilai tengah tengah Total
USIA <=25tahun Count 9 1 10
% within USIA 90,0% 10,0% 100,0%
>25tahun Count 8 14 22
% within USIA 36,4% 63,6% 100,0%
Total Count 17 15 32
% within USIA 53,1% 46,9% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7,942b 1 ,005
a
Continuity Correction 5,935 1 ,015
Likelihood Ratio 8,893 1 ,003
Fisher's Exact Test ,007 ,006
Linear-by-Linear
7,694 1 ,006
Association
N of Valid Cases 32
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4,69.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for USIA
15,750 1,675 148,119
(<=25tahun / >25tahun)
For cohort Kinerja.
2,475 1,372 4,465
Perawat = < nilai tengah
For cohort Kinerja.
,157 ,024 1,036
Perawat = >= nilai tengah
N of Valid Cases 32

LAMA.KERJA * Kinerja.Perawat

Crosstab

Kinerja.Perawat
>= nilai
< nilai tengah tengah Total
LAMA. <=5tahun Count 8 1 9
KERJA % within LAMA.KERJA 88,9% 11,1% 100,0%
>5tahun Count 9 14 23
% within LAMA.KERJA 39,1% 60,9% 100,0%
Total Count 17 15 32
% within LAMA.KERJA 53,1% 46,9% 100,0%
 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6,432b 1 ,011
a
Continuity Correction 4,589 1 ,032
Likelihood Ratio 7,168 1 ,007
Fisher's Exact Test ,018 ,014
Linear-by-Linear
6,231 1 ,013
Association
N of Valid Cases 32
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4,22.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for LAMA.
KERJA (<=5tahun / 12,444 1,323 117,032
>5tahun)
For cohort Kinerja.
2,272 1,298 3,975
Perawat = < nilai tengah
For cohort Kinerja.
,183 ,028 1,192
Perawat = >= nilai tengah
N of Valid Cases 32

STATUS.KEPEGAWAIAN * Kinerja.Perawat

Crosstab

Kinerja.Perawat
>= nilai
< nilai tengah tengah Total
STATUS.KEPEGAWAIAN PNS Count 9 2 11
% within STATUS.
81,8% 18,2% 100,0%
KEPEGAWAIAN
Non-PNS Count 8 13 21
% within STATUS.
38,1% 61,9% 100,0%
KEPEGAWAIAN
Total Count 17 15 32
% within STATUS.
53,1% 46,9% 100,0%
KEPEGAWAIAN
 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.

Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 5,542b 1 ,019
a
Continuity Correction 3,925 1 ,048
Likelihood Ratio 5,895 1 ,015
Fisher's Exact Test ,028 ,022
Linear-by-Linear
5,368 1 ,021
Association
N of Valid Cases 32
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5,16.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for STATUS.
KEPEGAWAIAN (PNS / 7,313 1,249 42,814
Non-PNS)
For cohort Kinerja.
2,148 1,164 3,962
Perawat = < nilai tengah
For cohort Kinerja.
,294 ,080 1,075
Perawat = >= nilai tengah
N of Valid Cases 32