Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299595596
CITATIONS READS
0 16
2 authors:
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Thong M. Pham
letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 26 September 2016
Reinforcement, mechanical property
S3-6-4
Muhammad N. S. HADI
Associate Professor, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
ABSTRACT:
This study evaluates different methods of strengthening existing square concrete columns under eccentric loading.
Twelve reinforced square concrete columns were cast. Four columns were kept square as reference, four columns
were modified with round corners and wrapped with three layers of CFRP, and four were circularised by circular
segments and wrapped with three layers of CFRP. Specimens from each group were tested under concentric,
eccentric (15 or 25 mm) and flexural bending. Results from the study showed that segmental circular concrete
covers considerably reduce stress concentration at the corners. FRP wrapped columns with circular segments
showed significant increase in load-carrying capacity compared to columns with only round corners.
load, “F” is flexural looading, “15” and “25” m mean addded to each rectangular seggment in orderr to create a
loading at 15 and 25 mm eccentriccity, respectivvely. molld for the con ncrete cover ((Fig. 2). Each
h segmental
Table 1 shoows the test maatrix of the ex
xperiments. circcular concrete cover had a chord of 150 0 mm (equal
to the
t side length h of the core column sectiion) and the
Table 1 Test matrix x heigght of the seg
gment was 31 mm. After 28 2 days, any
External foam m attached tot the concrrete surface covers was
Specimen Modificationn Eccentriccity rem
moved and th he surface grround to enssure smooth
Reinforcemeent
R-0 0 conntact when bonnding with FRRP.
R-15 15
None None
R-25 25
R-F Flexuraal
RF-0 0
20 mm
RF-15 Three layerrs 15
Round
RF-25 of CFRP 25
Corners
RF-F Flexuraal
CF-0 0
CF-15 Three layerrs 15
C
Circularizationn
CF-25 of CFRP 25
CF-F Flexuraal g. 2 Formworrks: (a) Core columns, (b
Fig b) Concrete
Coverrs
The nominaal compressivve strength of concrete
c usedd was
For Group CF, each
e specimeen was bondeed with four
32 MPa. T The internal reinforcement of each off the
mental circular concrete ccovers using Microsphere
segm M
tested speciimens consistted of 4N12 (12
( mm deforrmed
Blen
nd, mixed tog gether with eppoxy resin with 2:1 ratio
bars with 500 MPa nominal tenssile strength)) as
(Fig
g. 3). The epooxy resin had 54 MPa tenssile strength,
longitudinaal bars and R66 plain bars (6
( mm plain bars
2.8 GPa tensile modulus and 3.4% tensilee elongation.
with 250 MMPa nominal tensile
t strength) ties at 120 mm
Nexxt, the specim
mens were wraapped with thrree layers of
spacing. FFig. 1 showss the cross sections of the
CFRRP and left to dry for 7 ddays as specified by the
specimens.
supp
plier.
(a) (b)
g. 3 (a) Concrete covers, (b) Bonded specimens
Fig
ఋఴఱ
ߣൌ (1)
ఋ
Group CF under eccenttric load soareed directly too the ecceentric loads of 15 mm and 225 mm in which the axial
ultimate loaads from the value of zero and then fa failed load
ds were recorrded from thee testing mach
hine and the
quickly by rupture of CFFRP. It can bee clearly seenn that ben
nding momentts were calcul ulated by Eq. 2 and (3) a
the confineed specimens showed the ascending braanch puree bending moment
m observved from thee four-point
under concentric load buut the descend
ding branch uunder load
ding test.
eccentric looad.
ܯൌ ܲ௫ ሺ݁ ߜሻ (2)
As can be sseen in Figs. 9 and 10, the specimens
s witth an
identical section behavedd in a similar manner
m duringg the wheere Pmax is the ultimatee axial load d; e is the
first stage of the diaggram when concrete
c was not ecceentricity of loading; and δ iis the lateral deflection
d at
crushed. As a result, sppecimens in Groups
G R andd RF the ultimate load.
showed thee same slope of curve in the load – aaxial
deflection ddiagram.
Fig
g. 10 Load – deflection pllot, e=25
whole modified section was strengthened by the Loading. Journal of Composites for
confinement materials. Construction, 2001. 5(3): p. 146-152.
(2) All confined specimens showed higher 4. Rochette, P. and Labossière, P. Axial Testing of
load-carrying capacity compared to the Rectangular Column Models Confined with
unconfined specimens. Among the two groups Composites. Journal of Composites for
which were externally confined, Group CF Construction, 2000. 4(3): p. 129.
achieved the highest load-carrying capacity, 5. Shehata, I.A.E.M., Carneiro, L.A.V., and Shehata,
followed by Group RF. This enhancement is L.C.D. Strength of short concrete columns
mainly because the segmental circular concrete confined with CFRP sheets. Materials and
covers considerably increase the cross sectional Structures, 2002. 35(1): p. 50-58.
area of the specimens. 6. Al-Salloum, Y.A. Influence of edge sharpness on
(3) For CFRP confined specimens in Groups RF and the strength of square concrete columns confined
CF, the descending branch of the load – axial with FRP composite laminates. Composites Part
deflection diagrams after ultimate load can be B-Engineering, 2006. 38(5-6): p. 640-650.
witnessed for eccentric loading tests while the 7. ASTM. Determining Tensile Properties of Fiber
ascending branch was achieved from Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Used for
concentrically loaded specimens. This Strengthening of Civil Structures,
phenomenon indicates that eccentricity D7565/D7565M – 10, 2010, United States.
decreases the confinement efficiency of CFRP. 8. Australian Standard (AS). Metallic Materials–
Tensile Testing at Ambient Temperature, AS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1391, 2007, Sydney.
9. Hadi, M.N.S. and Widiarsa, I.B.R. Axial and
The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution Flexural Performance of Square RC Columns
of Mr. Xu Lei who helped in conducting the Wrapped with CFRP under Eccentric Loading.
experiments. The contribution of Mr. Fernando Journal of Composites for Construction, 2012.
Escribano, the main technical officer of this study, is 16(6), 640-649.
appreciated. Finally, the first author would like to 10. Yazici, V. and Hadi, M.N.S. Axial Load-Bending
acknowledge the Vietnamese Government for the Moment Diagrams of Carbon FRP Wrapped
support of his full PhD scholarship. Hollow Core Reinforced Concrete Columns.
Journal of Composites for Construction, 2009.
REFERENCES 13(4): p. 262-268.
11. Hadi, M.N.S. Behaviour of eccentric loading of
1. Benzaid, R., Chikh, N.E., and Mesbah, H. FRP confined fibre steel reinforced concrete
Behaviour of Square Concrete Column Confined columns. Construction and Building Materials,
with Gfrp Composite Warp. Journal of Civil 2009. 23(2): p. 1102-1108.
Engineering and Management, 2008. 14(2): p. 12. Pessiki, S. and Pieroni, A. Axial load behavior of
115-120. large-scale spirally-reinforced high-strength
2. Hadi, M.N.S. Comparative study of eccentrically concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 1997.
loaded FRP wrapped columns. Composite 94(3): p. 304-314.
Structures, 2006. 74(2): p. 127-135.
3. Parvin, A. and Wang, W. Behavior of FRP
Jacketed Concrete Columns under Eccentric