LAMPIRAN 3

ANALISIS DATA

ANALISIS BIVARIAT
Crosstabs

Sanitasi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

sehat 18 25.7 25.7 25.7

Valid tidak sehat 52 74.3 74.3 100.0

Total 70 100.0 100.0

 pengetahuan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

baik 39 55.7 55.7 55.7

Valid kurang 31 44.3 44.3 100.0

Total 70 100.0 100.0

 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

pengetahuan * Sanitasi 70 100.0% 0 0.0% 70 100.0%

pengetahuan * Sanitasi Crosstabulation

Sanitasi Total

sehat tidak sehat

Count 12 27 39

Expected Count 10.0 29.0 39.0

baik % within pengetahuan 30.8% 69.2% 100.0%

% within Sanitasi 66.7% 51.9% 55.7%

% of Total 17.1% 38.6% 55.7%

pengetahuan
Count 6 25 31

Expected Count 8.0 23.0 31.0

kurang % within pengetahuan 19.4% 80.6% 100.0%

% within Sanitasi 33.3% 48.1% 44.3%

% of Total 8.6% 35.7% 44.3%

Count 18 52 70

Expected Count 18.0 52.0 70.0

Total % within pengetahuan 25.7% 74.3% 100.0%

% within Sanitasi 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

% of Total 25.7% 74.3% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 1.178a 1 .278

Continuity Correctionb .656 1 .418
Likelihood Ratio 1.199 1 .273
Fisher's Exact Test .410 .210
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.161 1 .281
N of Valid Cases 70

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.97.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Std. Approx. Tb Approx. Sig.

Errora

Phi .130 .278

Nominal by Nominal Cramer's V .130 .278

Contingency Coefficient .129 .278

Kendall's tau-b .130 .115 1.114 .265
Kendall's tau-c .113 .101 1.114 .265
Ordinal by Ordinal
Gamma .299 .260 1.114 .265
Spearman Correlation .130 .115 1.079 .284c
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .130 .115 1.079 .284c
Measure of Agreement Kappa .107 .096 1.085 .278
N of Valid Cases 70

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

Value 95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for pengetahuan (baik / kurang) 1.852 .604 5.680

For cohort Sanitasi = sehat 1.590 .673 3.753
For cohort Sanitasi = tidak sehat .858 .655 1.126
N of Valid Cases 70

FREQUENCES

Statistics

Sanitasi pengetahuan

Valid 70 70
N
Missing 0 0
 Sanitasi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent

sehat 18 25.7 25.7 25.7

Valid tidak sehat 52 74.3 74.3 100.0

Total 70 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

Percent
baik 39 55.7 55.7 55.7

Valid kurang 31 44.3 44.3 100.0

Total 70 100.0 100.0