You are on page 1of 4

-JC.

fJTb 4-DJ - D5

Development of Judy Creek A Case Study


By A. D. BRADSHAW*
(14th Annual Techn-ical Meeting, P. di N.G. Divi-sion, and
65th Annual General Meeting, a.I.M., Edmonton, April, 1963)

ABSTRACT
This paper reviews engineering
expected in three to four weeks
time. It was necessary to stock-
I ..... u,~. \

.,.atN''''NI,1I ,
.,...
I"'~'
_"

considerations associated with the pile equipment and prepare lease .UIVt" 10 • UU"

development of the Judy Creek Bea- sites for the planned stepouts.
I·""'.('U'Q
........ '\
verhill Lake oil pool. The orderly Within one month, 550 truck-loads o lCJolON10N
development of the pool was facili-
tated by early studies of drilling of material, inclUding five drilling ...... "IK it"."
and completion programmes, pro- rigs, Cat equipment, camps, mud, t
duction practices and reservoir prob- cement, tubular goods, diesel oil,
lems. The reservoir study has serv- and gasoline, were assembled at the
ed as a basis for unitization and prepared locations. In anticipation
pressure maintenance, which be-
came effective less than four years of production, 24 miles of tempor-
after discovery. ary pipeline were strung north from
ALBERTA
Judy Creek to join Federated Pipe-
line's main line north of the Free- INDEX MAP
INTRODUCTION man river. A base camp, with
radio conununications, was also es-
T HE Judy Creek Beaverhill Lake
oil pool was discovered by Im- tablished. Later in the summer of Figure I.-Index Map.
pl"!riol Oil Limited in February, 1959, 1959, the route via Fort Assiniboine
two years after the Home-Regent was extended to Judy Creek as a Early wells used 10% -in. sUI'face
discovery of Swan Hills, several gravelled grade to provide year- casing and 7-in. production casing.
miles to the north. Judy Creek is lo- round access. In the interests o[ economy, the
cated about 100 miles northwest of hole size was reduced on subsequent
the city of Edmonton in the heavily wells from a 9-in. diameter to 7%
wooded Swan Hills area (Figure DRILLING inches (surface hole, 121,4 inches).
1) . Other Beaverhill Lake reef Surface casing was reduced to 8%
Wells in Judy Creek range in inches and production casing: to 5%
pools in the area are: Deer Moun- depth from 8,500 to 9,000 feet. At
tain, Swan Hills, Virginia Hills, inches. Current completions em·
least 600 feet of surface casing is ploy 4%-in. and, in some inslances,
Judy Creek West, Carson Creek cemented and pressure tested to
North, Carson Creek (gas), Kaybob 2 1Ai -in. casing.
1,000 psi. The hole is then drilled
and Snipe Lake. These pools all to total depth, with diamond coring Ear]y in the development of Judy
produce from the Swan Hills memo through the Beaverhill Lake forma- Creek, sevel'al drilling rigs were
ber of the Beaverhill Lake forma- tion in about half of the wells. No introduced to "Engineered Drilling
tion of Middle Devonian age. difficult drilling problems are en- Programmes" (1) [or improved elli-
Judy Creek has provided an ex· countered. dency. These are simply pre-planned
cellent proving ground for technical
advances during the past decade. o Inillol S1ep-oot T ~.~... =_
l
-HINt·
SOUTH SWAN HILLS
i

The purpose of this paper is to re- S Dual Tubln.;le1i$ Compl-etlon 1-_+-_-+_---I:....-_+o::..-.2..0-P~~~


~-~~-~+-__f------I
view briefly some of the advanced 2 wo~, lojoe'o," I ,~

techniques that were applied in the


development of the pool. T
~ ~~--+--.., J U0 Y eRE EK
flHD OUTrUtlE •

T 6' +---+--jf---1-I-+--'::1:..l,~~~-=-+-'-L+-++--l--t--+-:;.>:---l
INITIAL OPERATIONS UN IT OUTlI' E • • • t ....,.._•. p -._P'- i.

-<- ~ • • ~
Fig/o'e 2 is a detailed map of the
Judy Creek area. The discovery
. -._....
~
~ ....
4-
/.

well, 16-31-63-10, located on a Crown @ • @ • 0 •


drilling reservation, struck oil at a ~u; -',H I~'" Ch .... r v FI h "'\~::O-
~UDY CREE~
, ......._
depth of 8,600 feet. Immediate]y, an WEST'
.... AIRsunP l'-- ,
~ ~ ;~...-.
~... ~-_ )__-; -. ,. ~--:- :... ! j~ Ml
exploratory effort was launched,
with six step outs begun simultane-
. . ...... . DISCQVl;iZY ~

• @
ously to help define the reservoir
extent. Four of the six were sub- 4- •

sequently abandoned; two found


Beaverhill Lake oil.
A t the time of discovery, access
• 4-
to Judy Creek consisted only of a
winter trail, with spring break-Up

JUDY CREEK SOUTH • -<- • 10


*Imperial Oil Limited, Edmon-
ton, Alberta. Figure 2.-The Judy Creek Area.
24 Journal of Canadian Petroleum
;:.~"..;~'~~",.~.t:~_,-:.-_..:.--_,_, _ :~.~";. _
,

programmes designed to take con-


sistent advantage of all factprs
known to increase the over-all effi-
saturation distribution data to guide
the selection of suitable completion
intervals and for use in reservoir
degrees of over-all automation in
production facilities since 1954. De-
velopment at Judy Creek provided'
~~):~~!;::J
ciency of a drilling rig. They were engineering studies. At the time of the first opportunity to incorporate
developed in two phases; the first
being con1:erned with the opti-
com.pletion, a through-tubing neut-
ron log is run for correlation pur-
the optimum alllount of automatic
control equipment in field-wide pro- ~>.F:~; _
mum use of the rig's hydraulic poses to provide perforating depth duction facilities. The design stu~
system; the second giving a
prescribed variable bit weight
control and an· accurate record of
the open interval.
dies resulted in adopting a system
of satellite and central batteries f~.~;{-~<:; . -..
and rotary speed programme. that may be classified as semi- .... , ',. ~

During the first phase, four contract automatic.


rigs realized average savings of 272 COMPLETIONS
days and four bits per well when The wells are generally complet- The basic design was influenced
using optimum hydraulic program- ed with 5%-in. or 4%-in. casing by regulations pertaining to lease-
mes as compared to their previous set through the pay to some 50 block sizes and patterns and by the
conventional drilling practices in feet below the field oil-water con· assumption that ultimate develop-
Judy Creek. The second phase was tact at 5,270 feet subsea. The ment would be on quarter-section
:. introduced by an Imperial rig which casing is cemented to about 4,500 spacing. Figure 3 shows the satel-
employing the complete Engineered feet from surface (300 feet .above lite and central battery serving the
,.",' Drilling Programme averaged 23% original lease block. This illustrates
.~ the Viking formation) with 12 per
days from spud·in to rig release cent gel cement and 0.83 per cent the basic design of eight wells or
for its first eight wells. This was Kembreak retarder. A string of two sections per satellite and four
H~ days better than the average 2%-in, tubing is then run to bottom satellites per central battery.
contract drilling rate at the time. ~d the mud in the well is displaced The satellite batteries provide
As a result of this pace-setting per- to crude oil. The tUbing is landed production and well test control on
formance, most contractors have 30 feet above the highest expected an unattended basis. The satellite
adopted the Engineered Drilling perforations. Generally, a 10- to control panel contains program-
Programme at least in part. Current- 20-foot interval close to the top of ming, data recording and alarm
ly, about 25 days are required from the pay section is perforated with facilities. Production and test
the start of drilling operations to a through-tubing jet gun at a den- schedules are controlled by time
completion of the casing cement job sity of one shot per foot. Early clocks which, through' solenoids,
and rig release. This is a reduction completions often flowed immedi- activate electro-pneumatic valves at • • A" ;~~~::~::> .~_.
of about 20 per cent in drilling time ately after perforating but, with a .. _" ft. ~.:"

the manifold. A test programmer, "


as compared to earlier development decline in reservoir pressure, it is in the form of a cam timer, selects
wells. now usually necessary to stimulate the wells to test in a fixed sequence.
the wells with acid. Generally, In a normal sequence, one well is
LoGGING about 500 gallons of 15 per cent
The logs generally run are the tested per 24 hours. Oil and gas
hydrochloric acid pumped through test production data are recorded
Induction-Electrical (5FF-40 in early the perforations results in a strong
wells and currently 6FF-40) togeth- on digital counters at the satellite
ftowing well. panel, with no test data transmitted
er with the gamma-caliper-sonic
combination. Other logs were run to the central battery.
PRODUCTION FACILITIES
during early development, but prov- After passing through a satellite
ed to be of comparatively little Almost as soon as oil was dis- battery, all test and group prOduc-
value. Excellent porosity correla- covered at Judy Creek, engineering tion is combined and flows through
tions are obtained between sonic studies were underway to design the gathering system to a central
logs and core analyses. These, in gathering and production facilities. battery. The central battery pro-
conjunction with the induction log Imperial had been testing automatic vides group facilities for separating,
conductivities, provide fairly reliable battery components and various heating, treating (if neCessary),
o.l1 .1D WJir-L RU uo JUDY CREEK· BHL
~

···· r." JUDY CREEK TO'


SCHEMATIC CROSS SECTION

~
·· ·· ·· ·"I~ :}- .. UNIT OUTLINE BHL

. ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· · · V ·· ·
" ~

· · · -..... l- · ·
• IIHl Oll WEll
J.." · ·
· · · · .· · J. · · ., ~

···· ·· ~" · ·
~ .~:~~

· · · · · · · I~
• "4

· · · · · · I~ I.( · · ·
·· : ~~,: :4;~ ~~ .
~ ~-\':.:: .

· ··· ·
·· ·· · ·· · ·· ·· · .. I~. :r
~

lJ SATUUTE. IAtTUY

· · · -FLOWU:N$

·· · ·· ·· · ·· b· · .
T.63
• (:IENIIAL IlIAnUy
~ ~ - - - (i..A.THER:ING LINE
"

· ~I
~

n: ~ ~

Figure 3.-The Original Lease Block, showing Satellite


--"'=~-"-~:'="-'-"""",,,~""-"'-------------"'"
Figure 4.-The Lithologic Zones at Judy Creek shown
and Central Batteries. in Cross Section.
Technology, Spring, 1964, Colgory 25 i .
I) : '";-:::~
t :
--------------;---;---- - - - - - --

fer in communication with the 011


TABLE I. zone or the relatively tight S·l aqui·
AVERAGE RESERVOIR PROPERTIES fer which is separated from the 011
Depth 8,700 feet zone by the dense S-2 zone (Figlt1'8
Area 27,000 acres 4). Average reservoir properties
Reservoir Temperature 206°F
Discovery Pressure (datum -5,230 ft. ss) 3,497 psig are summarized in Table J.
Saturation Pressure (datum -5,230 ft ss) 2,290 psig
Net Pay 77 feet Regulations in effect at the time
Porosity 9.0% of discovery prescribed 80-acre
Permeability 50 md spacing. This was subsequently
Connate Water 16% changed to interim l60·acre spacing
Original Formation Volume Factor 1.413 res. bbllst. bbl in July, 1959. However, develop.
a.I.p. per :J,4 Section 5.1 million stb
Total D.I.P. at Discovery 850 million sth ment proceeded on half-section
Gravity-st. oil 41 API 0 spacing to accelerate pool definition.
Viscosity at Reservoir Conditions .37 cpo Evidence was obtained during the
18-month appraisal period to show
measurement and automatic cus- Elk Point. The structural trap is that efficient drainage would result
tody transfer of the crude oil. sealed by the overlying and flank. on quarter-section spacing. Pres-
The design for a further refine- ing argillaceous microcrystalline sure surveys indicated that uniform
ment of production facilities is now lime-muds of Beaverhill Lake age. drainage occurred over areas much
being finalized. This is referred to larger than the nominal SO·acre
The reservoir is quite strati- pattern. In addition, initial comple·
as the "field-gate system" and con- fied, with properties varying trans-
sists, in essence, of two-phase a versely as well as vertically. Five
tion pressure measurements gave
positive evidence of horizontal com·
gathering system and only one cus- lithologic zones, which represent
tody transfer point to serve the munication and effective drainage.
successive periods of reef develop- Figure 5 is a plot of completion
entire Judy Creek field. Satellite ment, can be identified and serve
testing will remain in effect for the pressures for some of the first sixty
as a basis for reservoir description. wells, and it is seen that these
new system, but the central batter- These have been designated the S-l,
ies will be eliminated. pressures closely follow the declin-
S-2, S-3, S-4 and S-5 in ascending ing field average pressure. Conse-
order from the base of the Swan quently, permanent 16D-acre spacing
RESERVOIR CHARACTERISTICS
Hills member. The upper three was ordered for the Judy Creek
Production at Judy Creek is de- layers constitute the "reef build·up" field by the Conservation Board in
rived from the Swan Hills member, and show good porosity develop- February, 1961. Subsequent drill·
a reefal development of the Beaver· ment. The relatively tight S-l and ing on this pattern has resulted in
hill Lake formation of Middle S-2 layers form the "reef platform" a total of 168 wells now drilled out
Devonian age. The reef consists which blankets the entire Swan of an expected ultimate 170 wells
mainly of organic and bioclastic Hills area and dips to the southwest on quarter-section spacing.
limestones with thicknesses of be· at 40 feet per mile. Water is en-
tween 100 and 400 feet, as shown countered at a relatively uniform In addition to horizontal com·
in the schematic cross section of depth of 5,210 feet subsea. How- munication, it was essential to know
Figure 4. The Swan Hills member ever, no natural water drive energy if vertical communication would be
lies on anhydritic limy shales of the is provided by either the small aqui- effective, or if the several strata
would act as independent res(!rvoirs.

--... 1959 1960 For this purpose, a T-shaped pat-

-
3500
tern (shown on Figltre 21 of five
1"-.. !i,,}3

~-
i'--.. 100...
r"
32 I I 3480
o
l1.
locations was completed with dual
tubing strings cemented in place of
i""'/~
~9
casing so that independent pressure
w
2~ ~
30
3i 45 59
'"~
and production data could be obta;n·
ed from two lithologic zones at each
~- --- 29
3460

rf't location. Generally, one zone was


VI
40 ~2 w
normally produced while the second
....'"
~ ... J. • i
t.
,
T
-
II
'10

i
W~Jo\

".
34111
43
51

~
3440 '"
o
zone was shut-in to obtain static
pressure data for the unproduced
·f.L
'. . I. •
"

.
I
UNIT OUJUNE II
.. ~
50 >
""
zone. These completions have been

tr-l: . 1
I.
15 .
?'
4 . ..
?9 •
. I~ I
.
54
r'\
3420 ::::
w
""
valuable in showing that, in general.
good pressure communication exists
[i,. '27' F~ •0 1
433644
.
. I' . 3400
between the upper three zones but
that portions of the S4 zone appear
to be isolated from the rest of the
reservoir. An attempt was made to
JUDY CREEK measure vertical pressure interfer-
ence by high rate tests, but results
were unreliable due to pressure
COMPLETION PRESSURE:S measurement limitations.

RECOVERY PREDICfIONS

Figure 5.-A Plot of Completion Pressures for Some of the First Sixty Reservoir studies show that nat-
Wells. ural depletion will be controlled by
26 Journal of Canadian Petroleum
.rock and fluid expansion as the reo
servo~r pressure declines to the
field requirements for a successful unitization, which became effective
~~~l~#. .;'

;~'/:::'~:<
flank waterfiood. To evaluate these on November 1, 1962.
saturation pressure of 2,290 psig. factors, a field pilot water injection
Thereafter, it will be controlled by test (Figure 6) was commenced in At about the same mne, approval
an inefficient solutiori gas drive. April, 1962. The injection well (12- for the pressure maintenance pro-
The total expected primary recovery 4-64-11) took water on vacuum at ject was obtained from the' Alberta
is 16 per cent" of the original oil in rates exceeding 6,500 BID. By July, Oil and Gas Conservation Board.
place. after half a million barrels of water FUll-scale injection commenced in
had been injected, presure response December, 1962, with Carson lake,
The fact that JUdy Creek is a 12 miles to the south, providing
closed reservoir with no effective had been observed at fifteen pres-
sure observation wells in the im- injection water. Since the middle
water drive was recognized sh~rtly of January, water injection .rates
after discovery. The rapid pressure mediate vicinity. This was signifi·
cant in demonstrating inter-zone have been maintained at between
decline (0.75 psi per day) and the 3,000 and 7,500 BID per well at the
prospect of a large early investment communication, as water injection
into the S-4 and S-3 layers below four injectors shown on Figure 6,
in artificial lift facilities, as well as giving a total input in excess of
future underproduction problems, the oil-water contact affected the oil
zone pressure of wells completed in 20,000 BID. Wellhead pressures
GOR penalties and low recovery, have averaged from 90 to 350 psig.
prompted an immediate investiga. the S-5 layer.
Initial response has been entirely
-tion of the possibility of utilizing The pilot waterfiood scheme was satisfactory and the ultimate suc-
the available water andlor natural expanded in July, 1962, to evaluate cess of the project seems assured
"
gas in the area for some form of injeetivity along the southern flank ~ ni·1~·:;'~ ~
pressure maintenance or· artificial of the reef. The three injection
displacement process. CONCLPSIONS
wells (4-18-63-10, 12-12-63-11 and 12-
These studies considered miscible 9-63-11) took water on vacuum at All phases of development at
displacement by pattern and crestal rates of from 4,000 to 7,000 BID. Judy Creek, from the improvement
gas injection and waterflooding by Pressure surveys in September and of access routes and development
pattern and downdip flank injection. November showed the adjacent area drilling to the design ~f production
The studies indicated a downdip of fifteen quarter sections to be in facilities and pressure maintenance
semi-peripheral water injection .good communication with the zone operations, have benefited from the
scheme to be the most attractive. of injection. application of up-to-date technology.
Engineered Drilling Programmes

~f~;:"
This scheme will realize maximum
gravity and sweep benefits. In addi- UNITIZATION AND PREsSURE have been credited' with reducing
tion, imbibition cross-flow is expect- MAINTENANCE drilling time by about 20 per cent.
ed to be an important factor in The pilot operations provided Similarly, optimum production effi-
improving waterflood performance. valuable data for finalizing the de- ciency is being achieved by field-wide ;... ~~ ~

Ultimate recovery is predicted to be


at least 45 per cent of the original
sign of the full-scale pressure main-
tenance scheme. With downdip,
application of semi-automatic con-
tro! systems using satellite batteries. ~:> ~~~; .
oil in place. semi.peripheral water injection, :The design and operation of the
there is bound to be considerable system was simplified initially due
" FIELD PILOT OPERATION inter-lease migration of fluids, lead- to consolidated lease ownership and,
Good water injectivity and pres· ing to inequities between operators. more recently, by unitization. Fut-
sure communication are essential This problem was sol~ed through ure modifications are planned to
,
provide a two-phase gathering and
"
R.ll R.10 W5M. JUDY CREEK - BHl field-gate system for even greater
operating efficiency.
'-f:"-~-J-_r--+---f---\.---+-- T 64
PILOT
Early reservoir studies considered
WATERFLOOD reservoir communication, drainage
UNIT OUTLINE
OPERATION problems and primary depletion per'
'. o formance. The low predicted re-
covery of 16 per cent prompted
pressure maintenance studies, lead- -. ~.

..' 8HL OIL WElL


ing to the design of a downdip,
semi-peripheral water injection
t~:'S:\~:~ .-: ~
.,, ;

Q INJECTION WElL system.


Field pilot water injection opera-
tions demonstrated the feasibility of
this scheme, and the full-scale oper-
ation was commenced in December
of 1962, less than four years after
~ the discovery date_ Ultimate recov-
'::"--"---I,;;-"I--..J--T.63 INITIAL PILOT AREA ery is predicted to be at least 45
per cent: of the original oil in place.
f"E'BJ
.,, o;..-r---+---l---+----1 PILOT EXPANSION AREA REFERENCE
i (1) Thompson, D. M., "Engineered
Drilling Programmes," CJ.M.- ,. ': ~:;.
A.I.M.E. Petroleum Engineering , ,~ ~ - ;.
Figure 6.-The Pilot Waterflood Operation at JUdy Creek, showing Section Meetings, Calgary &
" Location of Injection Wells. Edmonton, January 8/9, 1963.
Technology, Spring, 1964, Colgory 27
!, ,v ~ ....

You might also like