Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nana Noodleman,
Plaintiff,
Buster Moon,
Defendant.
x-------------------------------------x
MEMORANDUM
PREFATORY STATEMENT
THE PARTIES
“1. Term: This lease shall be for a term of two (2) years,
commencing on 01 July 2014 and expiring on 30 December
2016 (the “Rental Commencement Date”), unless earlier
terminated by the LESSOR by giving the LESSEE written
notice of such termination. Without prejudice to the other
grounds for pre-termination provided in this Contract, the
LESSOR reserves the right to pre-terminate the lease, upon
2 months’ written notice to the LESSEE, in the event that
the LESSOR decides to re-develop the Leased Premises for
other intended uses.
3. During the term of the lease, Defendant fails to pay his rental
obligations from July 2015 to June 2017. Wherein Plaintiff sent a statement
of accounts and reminder letters to the Defendant. 3
1
A copy of TCT No. 058-20100001010 is attached to the Complaint as Annex “A.” A copy of Tax Declaration is
attached to the Complaint as Annex “B”.
2
A copy of the Contract of Lease is attached to the Complaint as “Annex C”.
3
Copies of Statement of Accounts and Reminder Letter are attached to the Complaint as Annexes “D to D-23” and
Annexes” E to E-6”.
4
A copy of Termination Letter is attached to the Complaint as Annex F.
“Upon the cancellation or termination of the lease due to a
default on the part of the Lessee, failure to pay or any other
amount due or upon expiration of the lease, the Lessee shall
peacefully and immediately vacate the Leased Property
within thirty (30) days from such cancellation or
termination and, at the option of the Lessor, either return
possession thereof to the Lessor, free and clear of all
improvements made thereon by the Lessee, or for Lessee
to leave the Leased Property as it is with the permanent
improvements to the Lessor (except movable properties
belonging to the Lessee, which can be removed without
damaging the Leased Property) without any obligation on
the part of the Lessor to pay for the remaining value of
such improvements and without necessity of executing
further instruments.”5
7. Thus, Buster Moon had been occupying the Retail Unit illegally.
5
Emphasis and underscoring supplied.
6
Emphasis and underscoring supplied.
7
Copies of demand letter are attached to the Complaint as Annexes G to I.
8
Copies of final demand letter are attached to the Complaint as Annexes J to L.
“In view of the foregoing, this will therefore serve as our
FINAL DEMAND to you to settle the unpaid rental
inclusive of interests, penalties and hold-over charges and
to vacate the leased premises within FIVE (5) DAYS from
receipt hereof. Otherwise, we shall initiate the necessary
ejectment proceeding against you without any further
notice.”
10. In view of the inaction of the Defendant on the demand, Plaintiff has
no recourse but to file a Complaint for Unlawful Detainer with Damages
against Respondent before this Honorable Court.
11. Defendant t duly filed their Answer to the Complaint. Issues having
been joined and the parties filed their respective Pre-trial Briefs.
12. During the trial, Plaintiff presented Nana Noodleman and Ash Ortega
as their witnesses.
13. Also, Respondent presented Rosita Piggy, Crawly One Eye and Buster
Moon as their witnesses.
14. Considering the both parties rest their cases, this Honorable Court
issued an Order giving gave the parties until 25 October 2017 within which
to file their respective memoranda after which the case shall be submitted
for decision.
ISSUES
16. On the basis of the stipulation of issues submitted by the parties, and
approved by the Honorable Court, the following are the legal issues:
17. First, since Plaintiff is the absolute and registered owner of the Retail
Unit, it has the right to enjoy and use it, and a concomitant right of action
against unlawful holders and possessors in order to recover the same.9
19. Second, Respondent had been occupying the Retail Unit without
paying any corresponding rent to Plaintiff. Under law, Defendant, as lessee
clearly has the obligation to pay Plaintiff, its lessor due rental.10
22. Indeed, in action for Unlawful Detainer, the essential elements that
need to be established are simply: (1) the fact of lease by virtue of a contract
express or implied; (2) the expiration or termination of the possessor’s right
to hold possession (3) the withholding by the lessee of the possession of the
land or building after expiration or termination of the right to possession;
(4) letter of demand upon the lessee to pay the rental or comply with the
terms of the lease and to vacate the premises; and (5) the action must be filed
9
Civil Code, Art. 428.
10
Civil Code, Article. 1657.
11
This provides:
“Article 1673.The lessor may judicially eject the lessee for any of the following causes:
1. When the period agreed upon, or that which is fixed for the duration of lease under Articles 1682 and
1687, has expired;
2. Lack of payment of the price stipulated;
3. Violation of any the conditions agreed upon in the contract;
4. When the lessee devotes the thing leased to any use or service not stipulated which causes the
deterioration thereof; or if he does not observe the requirement in No. 2 of Article 1657, as regards the use
thereof.
The ejectment of tenants of agricultural lands is governed by special law.”
within one (1) year from the date of last demand received by the Defendant.
12All of the foregoing were duly established by Plaintiff.
23. If the Lessee continues enjoying the thing after the expiration of the
contract, overt the lessor’s objection, the former shall be subject to
responsibilities of a possessor in bad faith13.
24. It bears emphasizing that all of the foregoing has never been contested
by Defendant. Clearly, throughout the entire length of the proceeding,
Plaintiff has meritoriously shown its entitlement to the ejectment of
Defendant from the Retail Unit, and its entitlement to damages in the form
rentals-in-arrears by reason of Defendant’s action and conduct.
“Atty. Biason
Buster Moon
Answer: Nana.
Xxx”
26. The fact remains, therefore, that Nana Noodleman is the rightful
owner of the Retail Unit.
27. Moreover, the TCT presented by the plaintiff during the offer was not
denied by the Defendant, considering that this title was registered under the
name of Nana Noodlman.
28. Similarly, the Defendant did not present any proof in terms of
payment or the amount he paid in consideration of the Deed, he did not
register the document of sale or annotated at the back of title or better still,
the TCT No. 058-20100001010 was never cancelled. No evidence was
presented to show that the Deed of Absolute Sale is valid between Buster
Moon and Crawly One Eye.
12
Dela Cruz vs Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139442, 6 December 2006, 510 SCRA 103,116.
13
Civil Code, Article 1671
Acknowledgment Receipt. Plaintiff never received any payment nor issued
an Acknowledgment Receipts to the Respondent. Nana Noodleman always
issues an Original Receipt not a mere Acknowledgment Receipt. The
Acknowledgement Receipts that presented by Defendant was not original
and that the signature of the Plaintiff was forged.
31. With regards to the alleged Irrevocable Special Power Attorney given
to Crawly One Eye, Plaintiff denies the Irrevocable Special Power of
Attorney. Crawly One Eye is not an Agent of Plaintiff and Plaintiff did not
authorize nor appoint anyone especially Crawly One Eye to sell her
property. In fact, Plaintiff did not personally know Crawly One Eye.
32. Additionally, the Respondent did not present any witness that can
corroborate that Nana Noodleman signed and executed an Irrevocable
Special Power of Attorney in favor of Crawly One Eye.
34. As such, Plaintiff is losing revenue and incurring damages each day
Defendant unlawfully withholds possession of the Retail Unit from Plaintiff
and it is doubtful that Defendant no longer operates its business in the Retail
Unit and it does not appear to have sufficient assets to answer even for its
past obligations, much less for damages which Plaintiff continues to incur
by reason of such unjustified possession.
35. If after trial the court finds that the allegations of the complaint are
true, it shall render judgment in favor of the Plaintiff for the restitution of
the premises, the sum justly due as arrears of rent or reasonable
compensation for the use and occupation of the premises, attorneys fees and
costs14. If it finds that said allegation are not true, it shall render judgment
for the Defendant to recover his costs. If a counterclaim is established, the
court shall render judgment for the sum found in arrears from either part
and award costs as justice required.
14
Emphasis and underscoring suppliedsRules of Court, Section 17, Rule 70.
36. The recoverable damages in unlawful detainer case refer to rents or the
reasonable compensation for the use and occupation of the premises or fair
rental value of the property and attorney’s fees sand costs. 15
37. Plaintiff is entitled to reliefs demanded and the who part of such relied
consist in the immediate delivery and surrender by the Defendant of the
possession of the Retail Unit to the Plaintiff.
PRAYER
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise prayed for.
15
Herrera vs Bollos, G.R. No. 138258.
BIASON LLENA MALOTA QUIAMCO & YBAÑEZ LAW OFFICE
Counsel for the Plaintiff
Unit 107 Avida Towers Prime Taft, Pasay City
Telephone No. 585-0393 / 908-9391
Facsimile No. 848-1598
By:
CECILE S. MALOTA
PTR No. 325476; January 06, 2017; Pasay City
IBP Lifetime No. 741852; Pasay City Chapter
MCLE Compliance No. V-000300; May 02, 2016
EVANGELINE M. YBAÑEZ
PTR No. 654831; January 06, 2017; Pasay City
IBP Lifetime No.852146; Pasay City Chapter
MCLE Compliance No. V-000500; May 02, 2016
Copy Furnished:
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
I, JOSE DELA CRUZ, as Liaison Officer of BIASON LLENA MALOTA QUIAMCO &
YBAÑEZ LAW OFFICE with office address at Unit 107 Avida Towers Prime Taft, Pasay
City, after being duly sworn, depose and say:
That on 24 October 2017, I served a copy of the PRE-TRIAL BRIEF for the case entitled,
“Nana Noodleman vs Buster Moon” docketed as Civil Case No. 854145 pursuant to Section
3, 4, 5 and 10, Rule 13 of the Rules of Court, as follows:
By Personal Service: