You are on page 1of 10

Frequencies

Statistics

Peran Peran Peran Peran Peran Kepuasan


Pelaksana Pendidik Pengelola Konsultan Pembela Peran Peneliti Kerja
N Valid 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table
Peran Pelaksana

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 57 74.0 74.0 74.0
Kurang 20 26.0 26.0 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0

Peran Pendidik

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 59 76.6 76.6 76.6
Kurang 18 23.4 23.4 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0

Peran Pengelola

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 60 77.9 77.9 77.9
Kurang 17 22.1 22.1 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0

Peran Konsultan

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 60 77.9 77.9 77.9
Kurang 17 22.1 22.1 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0

Peran Pembela

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 62 80.5 80.5 80.5
Kurang 15 19.5 19.5 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0

Peran Peneliti

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 56 72.7 72.7 72.7
Kurang 21 27.3 27.3 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0
Kepuasan Kerja

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Baik 56 72.7 72.7 72.7
Kurang 21 27.3 27.3 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0

Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Peran Pelaksana *
77 100.0% 0 .0% 77 100.0%
Kepuasan Kerja
Peran Pendidik *
77 100.0% 0 .0% 77 100.0%
Kepuasan Kerja
Peran Pengelola *
77 100.0% 0 .0% 77 100.0%
Kepuasan Kerja
Peran Konsultan *
77 100.0% 0 .0% 77 100.0%
Kepuasan Kerja
Peran Pembela *
77 100.0% 0 .0% 77 100.0%
Kepuasan Kerja
Peran Peneliti *
77 100.0% 0 .0% 77 100.0%
Kepuasan Kerja

Peran Pelaksana * Kepuasan Kerja

Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja
Baik Kurang Total
Peran Pelaksana Baik Count 46 11 57
Expected Count 41.5 15.5 57.0
% within Peran
80.7% 19.3% 100.0%
Pelaksana
% within Kepuasan Kerja 82.1% 52.4% 74.0%
% of Total 59.7% 14.3% 74.0%
Kurang Count 10 10 20
Expected Count 14.5 5.5 20.0
% within Peran
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Pelaksana
% within Kepuasan Kerja 17.9% 47.6% 26.0%
% of Total 13.0% 13.0% 26.0%
Total Count 56 21 77
Expected Count 56.0 21.0 77.0
% within Peran
72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Pelaksana
% within Kepuasan Kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 7.036b 1 .008
Continuity Correctiona 5.573 1 .018
Likelihood Ratio 6.592 1 .010
Fisher's Exact Test .017 .011
Linear-by-Linear
6.944 1 .008
Association
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5.45.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .289 .008
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
Pelaksana (Baik / 4.182 1.398 12.512
Kurang)
For cohort Kepuasan
1.614 1.023 2.547
Kerja = Baik
For cohort Kepuasan
.386 .194 .768
Kerja = Kurang
N of Valid Cases 77

Peran Pendidik * Kepuasan Kerja


Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja
Baik Kurang Total
Peran Pendidik Baik Count 47 12 59
Expected Count 42.9 16.1 59.0
% within Peran Pendidik 79.7% 20.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 83.9% 57.1% 76.6%
% of Total 61.0% 15.6% 76.6%
Kurang Count 9 9 18
Expected Count 13.1 4.9 18.0
% within Peran Pendidik 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 16.1% 42.9% 23.4%
% of Total 11.7% 11.7% 23.4%
Total Count 56 21 77
Expected Count 56.0 21.0 77.0
% within Peran Pendidik 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.118b 1 .013
Continuity Correctiona 4.714 1 .030
Likelihood Ratio 5.686 1 .017
Fisher's Exact Test .031 .017
Linear-by-Linear
6.038 1 .014
Association
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4.91.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .271 .013
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
3.917 1.277 12.010
Pendidik (Baik / Kurang)
For cohort Kepuasan
1.593 .986 2.574
Kerja = Baik
For cohort Kepuasan
.407 .205 .806
Kerja = Kurang
N of Valid Cases 77

Peran Pengelola * Kepuasan Kerja


Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja
Baik Kurang Total
Peran Pengelola Baik Count 45 15 60
Expected Count 43.6 16.4 60.0
% within Peran Pengelola 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 80.4% 71.4% 77.9%
% of Total 58.4% 19.5% 77.9%
Kurang Count 11 6 17
Expected Count 12.4 4.6 17.0
% within Peran Pengelola 64.7% 35.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 19.6% 28.6% 22.1%
% of Total 14.3% 7.8% 22.1%
Total Count 56 21 77
Expected Count 56.0 21.0 77.0
% within Peran Pengelola 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .708b 1 .400
Continuity Correctiona .284 1 .594
Likelihood Ratio .682 1 .409
Fisher's Exact Test .538 .291
Linear-by-Linear
.699 1 .403
Association
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4.64.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .095 .400
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
1.636 .516 5.187
Pengelola (Baik / Kurang)
For cohort Kepuasan
1.159 .792 1.695
Kerja = Baik
For cohort Kepuasan
.708 .325 1.543
Kerja = Kurang
N of Valid Cases 77

Peran Konsultan * Kepuasan Kerja


Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja
Baik Kurang Total
Peran Konsultan Baik Count 46 14 60
Expected Count 43.6 16.4 60.0
% within Peran Konsultan 76.7% 23.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 82.1% 66.7% 77.9%
% of Total 59.7% 18.2% 77.9%
Kurang Count 10 7 17
Expected Count 12.4 4.6 17.0
% within Peran Konsultan 58.8% 41.2% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 17.9% 33.3% 22.1%
% of Total 13.0% 9.1% 22.1%
Total Count 56 21 77
Expected Count 56.0 21.0 77.0
% within Peran Konsultan 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.126b 1 .145
Continuity Correctiona 1.322 1 .250
Likelihood Ratio 2.009 1 .156
Fisher's Exact Test .216 .126
Linear-by-Linear
2.099 1 .147
Association
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4.64.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .164 .145
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
2.300 .738 7.164
Konsultan (Baik / Kurang)
For cohort Kepuasan
1.303 .855 1.987
Kerja = Baik
For cohort Kepuasan
.567 .273 1.176
Kerja = Kurang
N of Valid Cases 77

Peran Pembela * Kepuasan Kerja


Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja
Baik Kurang Total
Peran Pembela Baik Count 49 13 62
Expected Count 45.1 16.9 62.0
% within Peran Pembela 79.0% 21.0% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 87.5% 61.9% 80.5%
% of Total 63.6% 16.9% 80.5%
Kurang Count 7 8 15
Expected Count 10.9 4.1 15.0
% within Peran Pembela 46.7% 53.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 12.5% 38.1% 19.5%
% of Total 9.1% 10.4% 19.5%
Total Count 56 21 77
Expected Count 56.0 21.0 77.0
% within Peran Pembela 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.379b 1 .012
Continuity Correctiona 4.851 1 .028
Likelihood Ratio 5.831 1 .016
Fisher's Exact Test .021 .017
Linear-by-Linear
6.296 1 .012
Association
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
4.09.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .277 .012
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
4.308 1.318 14.081
Pembela (Baik / Kurang)
For cohort Kepuasan
1.694 .971 2.953
Kerja = Baik
For cohort Kepuasan
.393 .200 .773
Kerja = Kurang
N of Valid Cases 77

Peran Peneliti * Kepuasan Kerja


Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja
Baik Kurang Total
Peran Peneliti Baik Count 42 14 56
Expected Count 40.7 15.3 56.0
% within Peran Peneliti 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 75.0% 66.7% 72.7%
% of Total 54.5% 18.2% 72.7%
Kurang Count 14 7 21
Expected Count 15.3 5.7 21.0
% within Peran Peneliti 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 25.0% 33.3% 27.3%
% of Total 18.2% 9.1% 27.3%
Total Count 56 21 77
Expected Count 56.0 21.0 77.0
% within Peran Peneliti 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
% within Kepuasan Kerja 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 72.7% 27.3% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. Exact Sig. Exact Sig.


Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .535b 1 .465
Continuity Correctiona .197 1 .657
Likelihood Ratio .522 1 .470
Fisher's Exact Test .567 .323
Linear-by-Linear
.528 1 .468
Association
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Computed only for a 2x2 table
b. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5.73.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.


Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .083 .465
N of Valid Cases 77
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence
Interval
Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for Peran
1.500 .504 4.463
Peneliti (Baik / Kurang)
For cohort Kepuasan
1.125 .802 1.578
Kerja = Baik
For cohort Kepuasan
.750 .352 1.597
Kerja = Kurang
N of Valid Cases 77
Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary


a
Unweighted Cases N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 77 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 77 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 77 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total
number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value


Baik 0
Kurang 1

Block 0: Beginning Block


Classification Tablea,b

Predicted

Kepuasan Kerja Percentage


Observed Baik Kurang Correct
Step 0 Kepuasan Kerja Baik 56 0 100.0
Kurang 21 0 .0
Overall Percentage 72.7
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)


Step 0 Constant -.981 .256 14.693 1 .000 .375

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step Variables PELKSNA 7.036 1 .008
0 PDDK 6.118 1 .013
PMBELA 6.379 1 .012
Overall Statistics 10.923 3 .012
Block 1: Method = Enter
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 10.297 3 .016
Block 10.297 3 .016
Model 10.297 3 .016

Model Summary

-2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke


Step likelihood R Square R Square
1 79.939 .125 .181

Classification Tablea

Predicted

Kepuasan Kerja Percentage


Observed Baik Kurang Correct
Step 1 Kepuasan Kerja Baik 51 5 91.1
Kurang 16 5 23.8
Overall Percentage 72.7
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

95.0% C.I.for EXP(B)


B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper
Step
a
PELKSNA 1.103 .597 3.422 1 .064 3.015 .936 9.706
1 PDDK .640 .787 .662 1 .416 1.897 .406 8.869
PMBELA .710 .829 .734 1 .391 2.034 .401 10.320
Constant -4.124 1.090 14.311 1 .000 .016
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: PELKSNA, PDDK, PMBELA.

You might also like