SRI ESHWAR COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

COIMBATORE - 202
Self Appraisal Report (SAR) of Faculty for the Academic year 2015-16

Brief resume of the Faculty

Department ECE Date 19.08.2016

Date Of Joining & Designation At 01.06.2012 &

Name The Time Of Joining Assistant Professor

Qualifications M.E Current Designation Assistant Professor

No of years Teaching experience No of Years of Experience (Others)

in other colleges at SECE Industry Polytechnic School

2 3
Note: All the data to be furnished in this form should pertain to the period 1st June 2015 to 31st May 2016

Professional Development

a) Qualification up gradation if any (PhD, etc,.)

College / Course Expected date of

Degree Branch FT / PT Current status
University joining date completion
PhD ECE PT Anna University 25.06.15 Course work 2018-19

Performance DA – 5%
Management DA – At Management discretion

Summary table of achievement of parameters

Parameter Maximum Performance DA % DA % achieved

Academic Results

Journal publication

Innovative Student project and

IPL coordination
Faculty Development Program

Student Feedback

Compliance to responsibility
(Annexure -1)
Compliance to Academic
Excellence (Annexure -1)

Total

Appraisal Section
1. Academic Results
Max DA %
Expected Achievement
Awarded
For every tough subject wherein 90% pass percentage achieved a score of 1.25 would be
granted and for achievement between 85% - 89.9% a score of 0.65 would be awarded

For other subjects achieving 93% and above would be awarded 1.25 mark and for
achieving a pass percentage of 89-92.9 % would be awarded 0.65 mark

Tough / Normal Overall

Semester, pass
Branch & Course title % of Score
Section the
class

DA % achieved = (Total score x 2.5) / Total subjects handled and limited to max of 2.5

2. Journal Publication

Max DA %
Expected Achievement
Awarded

Enhanced North Asian 2454 - 7514 1/5/2016

Ahb for International
Audio Codec Research
Control Journal
Using I2c Consortium

DA % achieved

3. Innovative Student Project and Industry Powered Lab Coordination

Max DA %
Expected Achievement
Awarded

Semester Names of Name of the Project Significant Score

students Industry Powered Associated with Achievement
Lab
 DA % achieved
4. Faculty Development Program

Max DA %
Expected Achievement
Awarded
Should have undergone minimum of 1 day of Teaching Learning process, 1 week of
Industrial Training and 1 day of research related program
0.5
Scoring: for Teaching – Learning process -0.1%, for industrial Training -0.3% and for
Training related to research 0.1%

Program Program Date

Program Title Venue Score
Category From To

Teaching –
Learning
Process

03/11/2015 07/11/2015 Steps

FDP on ARM Processor
Knowledge 0.5
and IOT
Service(P) Ltd
Industrial
Training

Training
related to
Research

DA % achieved 0.5

5. Students feedback

Max DA %
Expected Achievement
Awarded
For average rating of 90% - 0.5 and for rating between 81-90% - 0.25 0.5

Semester/ Branch/
Course Title Feedback % Score
Section

DA % achieved = Overall Average (Average of all scores)

6. Compliance to responsibilities

Max DA %
Expected Achievement
Awarded

% compliance achieved

DA % Achieved

7. Compliance to Academic Excellence

Additional Teaching Additional Interactive/Collaborative Additional

Materials used (like References Used Techniques adopted Evaluation
presentations/ (Foreign Author (GD, group mini project, Methods used
videos/ Models Books, NPTEL tutorials, problem (like Quiz,
etc.,) video lectures, solving, flipped Clicker,
Websites, etc.,) classroom) Worksheet, etc.,
Subject Name
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5

Attendance Report (LOP if any)

S.No Loss of Pay Dates Reason

1
2

What are the areas in your opinion, you could have done better?
1.

What are your plans for the next year in terms of improving students’ performance and enhancing your
professional capabilities?

1. ATTENDING INDUSTRY TRAINING WILL HELP IN PROJECT.

2. ACADEMIC WISE REGULARLY MONITORING OF WEAK STUDENTS AND COACHING BY GIVING NOTES
AND HOME TEST.
3. INNOVATIVE PROJECT.

To make them more practical oriented instead of theory. More of hands-on is to given

What is the support you require from the management to achieve the above plans?
Date: Signature of the Faculty

Signature of the HOD Signature of HR Signature of the PRINCIPAL