Professional Documents
Culture Documents
March 1, 2017
Researchers: M. David Rudd, Ph.D., A.B.P.P., Craig J. Bryan, Psy.D., A.B.P.P., Evelyn G.
Wertenberger, Ph.D., L.C.S.W., Alan L. Peterson, Ph.D., A.B.P.P., Stacey Young-McCaughan,
R.N., Ph.D., Jim Mintz, Ph.D., Sean R. Williams, L.C.S.W., Kimberly A. Arne, L.C.S.W., Jill
Breitbach, Psy.D., A.B.P.P., Kenneth Delano, Ph.D., Erin Wilkinson, Psy.D., Travis O. Bruce,
M.D.
Research Questions:
The primary aim was to determine whether brief CBT significantly reduced post
treatment suicide attempt rates during the 24-month follow-up period. The first hypothesis was
that the hazard ratio for a subsequent suicide attempt would be significantly lower in the brief
CBT group compared with the treatment as usual group, and the second hypothesis was that the
proportion of soldiers making a suicide attempt during follow-up would be significantly lower
among those receiving brief CBT compared with those receiving treatment as usual.
Research Findings:
Results of this randomized clinical trial demonstrated that brief CBT was effective in
preventing suicide attempts among active-duty soldiers who were experiencing suicidal
ideation with intent and/or had made a suicide attempt during the month immediately
preceding treatment.
Eight participants in brief CBT (estimated proportion: 13.8%) and 18 participants in
treatment as usual (estimated proportion: 40.2%) made at least one suicide attempt during
the 2-year follow-up period (Wald x2 =5.28, df=1, p=0.02, hazard ratio=0.38, 95% confi-
dence interval [CI]=0.16–0.87, number needed to treat=3.88), which suggests that
soldiers in brief CBT were approximately 60% less likely to make a suicide attempt
during the follow-up period than soldiers in treatment as usual.
In terms of depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress symptoms, the Hedge’s g values
indicated larger declines among participants in brief CBT, although none of the between-
group differences were statistically significant.
A decreased likelihood for medical retirement that fell short of statistical significance was
observed among participants in brief CBT compared with participants in treatment as
usual (26.8% compared with 41.8%; odds ratio=0.51, 95% CI=0.25–1.04, p=0.06).
Recommendations:
Additional research is needed to determine whether brief CBT may also have a positive
effect on military readiness and social-occupational outcomes. Also, additional studies targeting
female soldiers are needed. Finally, although the follow-up rate for our primary outcome
variable, suicide attempts, was very good, there was considerable attrition for follow-up self-
reported measures because of the highly mobile nature of military personnel, which prohibited
participants from following up in person.
Reflective Questions:
After I read the journal, I realized that even a brief cognitive-behavioral therapy
can be very effective in treating suicidal ideation or suicide attempts. I learned that with a
short period of time, the therapy's result came out positive because of the well-organized
and efficient way of conducting sessions with the clients. This only shows that there will
be a relevant change in my behavior and cognitive structures if I will take a step by step
process and really focus on the desired goals even with a time constraint. Since
cognitive-behavioral therapy was used, it is evident in the sessions that it has a directive
approach and the client was actively engaged where in behavioral techniques are being
practiced. Unlike psychoanalysis, this study demonstrated that cognitive-behavioral
therapy is more transparent, more evidenced based and not reliant on the therapist's
interpretation (Wedding & Corsini, 2014). It's ultimate goal is for the clients to be
competent, have skill mastery and to successfully complete every task in the course of the
treatment so that the they can live a more productive and fulfilled life.
3. Insights/ Realizations