Professional Documents
Culture Documents
radome
of εr=3
Although the F-solver may have some advantages for radiating element
design, in general speed is not one of them. For the same element
design on the same computer as for the T-solver, the F-solver required
142 minutes, x36 that for the T-solver. It also required x24 the memory.
This is why the T-solver was used for design of the radiator.
grating lobe
backward forward
half half
space space
Just as the returns vary over the locations in the array, so do the element
patterns.
Please note that the steady state energy criterion has not been satisfied.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peak memory used (kB) Free physical memory (kB)
Physical Virtual At begin Minimum
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- On a dual Woodcrest
Matrices calc.
Solver run total
1889912
6964332
2953900
7483304
4149840
10385660
4023964
6290616 computer the array
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solver Statistics: simulation required 7
Number of meshcells: 35692776 Gbytes and 22 hours
Excitation duration: 7.109097e-001 ns before timing out at 20
Calculation time for excitation:
Number of calculated pulse widths:
5903
19.9993
s
pulses. Energy was
Steady state accuracy limit:
Simulated number of time steps:
-40
19743
dB
near -40 dB in all cases.
Maximum number of time steps: 19743
Time step width:
without subcycles: 7.201387e-004 ns
used: 7.201387e-004 ns
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total simulation time: 324012 s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------